Philip J Berg is appealing his lawsuit dismissal to the US Supreme Court. Here is Mr. Berg’s news release:
“Press Release: Berg v. Obama dismissed – Berg appealing to U. S. Supreme Court
Saturday, 25 October 2008 16:51 administrator Main – News Philip J. Berg is Appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court as Obama is “NOT” qualified to be President of the United States Lawsuit Against Obama Dismissed from Philadelphia Federal Court
For Immediate Release: – 10/25/08 – Contact Info at end.
UPDATE: Ruling attached at end. It’s a really poor copy, but it is all we have for the moment. Willl put up a better copy when we get one.
(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 10/25/08) – Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, announced today that he is immediately appealing the dismissal of his case to the United States Supreme Court. The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.
Berg said, “I am totally disappointed by Judge Surrick’s decision and, for all citizens of the United States, I am immediately appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court.
This is a question of who has standing to uphold our Constitution. If I don’t have standing, if you don’t have standing, if your neighbor doesn’t have standing to question the eligibility of an individual to be President of the United States – the Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful person in the world – then who does?
So, anyone can just claim to be eligible for congress or the presidency without having their legal status, age or citizenship questioned.
According to Judge Surrick, we the people have no right to police the eligibility requirements under the U.S. Constitution.
What happened to ‘…Government of the people, by the people, for the people,…’ Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address 1863.
We must legally prevent Obama, the unqualified candidate, from taking the Office of the Presidency of the United States,” Berg said.
Our website obamacrimes.com now has 71.8 + million hits. We are urging all to spread the word of our website – and forward to your local newspapers and radio and TV stations.
Berg again stressed his position regarding the urgency of this case as, “we” the people, are heading to a “Constitutional Crisis” if this case is not resolved forthwith.
* * For copies of all Court Pleadings, go to obamacrimes.com
# # #
Philip J. Berg, Esquire
555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
Cell (610) 662-3005
(610) 825-3134
(800) 993-PHIL [7445]
Fax (610) 834-7659
philjberg@obamacrimes.com This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it”
Read more here:
Citizen WElls 
Handled right, the Fed District Court throwing out Berg for lack of standing can present a political check-mate “win” on appeal for the anti-Obama side (if not in law, in the Court of Public Opinion). Here’s how: SIMPLY SPREAD AROUND OBAMA’S APPELLATE BRIEF HAVING TO ARGUE AGAINST AN AMERICAN VOTER’S RIGHT TO RAISE THE QUESTION UNDER THE CONSTITUTION. Should be a PR disaster for the Dems and Obama!!!
Someone with press credentials needs to send a press release to the AP on the Supreme Court Appeal. I just read on Drudge a blurb about the case being dismissed. The AP blurb trivialized the lawsuit.
It is imperative that we keep this alive in the main stream press or it will loose creditibility.
Below is the AP Blurb.
javascript:eMail_Friend(540, 540);
Sorry I could not create a link to the page, log on to Drudge to see the blurb.
Ted:
Brilliant idea.
Someoneneeds to send the Brief to AP.
I put this post up on the military thread I maintain. Keep fighting and thank you. Zach
Ted,
Unfortunately, I fear it will be too late. Parties generally have quite awhile to file responses in opposition to petitions for certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Court may be able to order an expedited response by Obama et al., but even then it will put us right before the election at best. There simply is not enough time for the Berg suit to have any practical effect on this election.
Our only hope is that (1) the media really takes Obama to task for refusing to do the simple task of turning over his birth certificate (unlikely), or (2) someone shows up with concrete proof that Obama was born in Kenya and holds a press conference.
One last point to consider: I fear the U.S. Supreme Court will not be too quick to get involved in this mess in light of the Bush v. Gore mess in 2000.
Ben Ted !!!
We are here for a purpose! They can call us anything they want… you have NEVER HEARD A RACIST comment on CW’s site…
This is about protecting our most SACRED COUNTRY… believe me, it is sacred.
DON’T GIVE UP !!!
The recent Supreme Court Decision which ruled that “federal law that is silent on the question of whether it creates a private cause of action,… carries no “implied” right of action. “; will require that the litigant suing to force adherence to a federal law proves “right of action”.
An analysis of the Ninth Amendment to the constitution as to whether it infers the right of action to citizens, is needed. The entire definition of the Consitution as a document defining rights of citizen, would infer to it “right of action”
OK so what? Well the Supreme Court just threw out “The Underlying Dispute: Did Ohio’s Secretary of State Violate the Post-Bush v. Gore Federal Voting Statute? ” brought by RNC to it, because there was not a specific “Right of action in the law”.
http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dorf/20081021.html
correct me if i am wrong, Quin, but part of the reason they through it out was because the RNC was deemed a public party, and not a private citizen. Wouldn’t a private citizen take this up, in that case…oh i get…then they would have “no standing”.
We the people…….seemed to be s c r e w e d…..royally.
*”threw it out”