Leo C. Donofrio NJ lawsuit, US Supreme Court Appeal, Justice Clarence Thomas, NJ Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Judge Jack M. Sabatino, Donofrio filed Judicial Misconduct

** See Update below **

I have tried to access the Leo C. Donofrio website since late last night. Lurker, a great commenter on
the Citizen Wells blog, has provided the text from Mr. donofrio’s latest post.

“Posted: Nov.21.2008 @ 6:53 pm | Lasted edited: Nov.21.2008 @ 8:25 pm
JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT ALLEGED BY LEO DONOFRIO IN NJ SUPERIOR COURT APPELLATE DIVISION – OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE ALLEGED AGAINST JUDGE JACK M. SABATINO IN ACTION CHALLENGING ELIGIBILITY OF PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES FOR 2008 ELECTION.

[MEDIA UPDATE:]  Today, Leo Donofrio learned that New Jersey Appellate Division Judge Jack M. Sabatino has failed to correct the public record of the initial lower court case.  Leo Donofrio feels it is imperative that he bring this battle public.  Therefore, he will appear on the Plains Radio Network with Ed Hale tonight at 9:00 PM EST.  Leo Donofrio will also appear on Overnight AM with Lan Lamphere at 11:00 PM EST as well.
Today, Leo C. Donofrio filed, with the NJ Supreme Court’s Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct, an official allegation of Judicial Misconduct against Appellate Division Judge Jack M. Sabatino with regard to the initial stage of this litigation which was originally filed in the NJ Superior Court, Appellate Division.  The case, having come directly from an appeal to the New Jersey Supreme Court is now before the the United States Supreme Court, “DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 5, 2008″ before all nine Supreme Court Justices. 

I am very concerned that if the United States Supreme Court requests the official records of the case from the NJ Appellate Division, a fraudulent case file – not including all relevant documents – will be forwarded to the SCOTUS and thereby the case now pending might be jeopardized.

A copy of the official complaint – by way of a New Jersey Supreme Court generated form – will be uploaded to this blog shortly. ”

** UPDATE **

From Leo Donofrio:

“Yesterday, Nov. 21 2008, my previous blog – blogtext.org/naturalborncitizen – was taken down as was the entire blogtext.org network.

I have relocated here to Blogger.com. Mirror sites containing the exact content have been (or will be shortly) set up. Everybody is hereby authorized to mirror the contents of this blog. The following sites are trusted by me to have exact content”

http://thenaturalborncitizen.blogspot.com/

20 responses to “Leo C. Donofrio NJ lawsuit, US Supreme Court Appeal, Justice Clarence Thomas, NJ Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Judge Jack M. Sabatino, Donofrio filed Judicial Misconduct

  1. Am neither for or against the Plaintiffs in these cases nor for against Mr. Obama; however, with that said, it would certainly leave everyone with a sense of fairness if these cases weren’t simply discarded or made to feel like an invisible gaultlet was thrown down before the due process of the Plaintiffs could even be considered.

    Cannot wait for the president-elect to simply schedule a press conference and simply set the record straight by sharing his birth certificate openly. The American people and all the Plaintiffs involved in the various legal proceedings deserve at least that much.

    http://ontheseventhday.wordpress.com/

  2. Thanks so much for keeping us all updated with the latest scheme that is being devised to prevent the truth about Obama’s citizenship status from being shown in a courtroom or to the public.

    Thank God that Mr. Donofrio is on top of this situation. This is a judicial nightmare! It just goes to show how vast the reach of the Obama birth place secrecy and conspiracy really is!

  3. It is my understanding, Leo Donofrio’s website has been hacked into and has been disabled. This seemed to have occured at about 7PM on 11.21.08

  4. Hello Citizen Wells,
    Since Leo Donofrios site does not work.
    He had after one interview a link where I could hear it at a later time.
    Is it possible You create such a link too, since I am not sure that I can listen live.
    Thank You

  5. ComancheShaman

    Donofrio has the case of the millennium and has handled it correctly, and no lower court judge or any one should be allowed to sidetrack the issue. Folks, this is OUR country and I fought for it before and we should be ready and willing to do it now. Stand with Donofrio and speak up and out loud.

  6. ComancheShaman

    Go here and listen to Donofrio last night on patriotbrigaderadio
    http://www.lanlamphere.com/audio/livejava.php

  7. ComancheShaman

    sorry forgot to tell you you have to listen to the interview before him but Leo lays out everything that happened on the 21st and how his blog went down right after he posted the documents supporting hi case against the lower court judge

  8. Leo Donofrio was interviewed on the Lan Lamphere show last night. Listen here until it is archived:

    http://www.lanlamphere.com/audio/livejava.php

  9. Do those disc jockeys that talked to the Ambassador in Kenya realize what they are sitting on? That tape should definitely to to authorities or someone that can protect it. How much more does our government want?bkw

  10. citizenwells // November 21, 2008 at 9:09 pm

    “Never, Never, Never give up.”
    Winston Churchill.

    OH my Lord, you are so right.

    Gathering STEAM and second wind.

    THANKS, I needed that.

  11. The whole blogtext.org website is gone. According to WHOIS the owner is Andy Wilfong. Has he shut down the site, and are there any connections between him & anyone in the DNC family? Seems more than coincidental.

  12. In light of the coverup we’re observing today: Jim Garrison, thank you for being the only person in America with the balls to bring about a trial in the assassination of John F. Kennedy.

  13. Pingback: Petitioners: If you’re eligible, show us the proof! « Goodtimepolitics

  14. Beckwith, from: theobamafile.com says Donofrio is under FBI protection. See “latest news” section . If true, this is getting hella scary. Maybe some of you need to get prepaid phones. Who knows which sites will go down next.

  15. CASE (1): Don Hamrick v. United States, Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Petition No. 1142-06 (international human rights complaint is still active pending admissibility determination. For more information contact Kevin Alan Baumert, Assist Legal Advisor for Human Rights and Refugee Affairs (L/HRR) 3422 HST; Office of the Legal Advisor (L); U.S. Department of State; 2201 C Street NW; Washington, DC  20520; Telephone No. (202) 647-2773.)

    CASE (2): Don Hamrick v. President Bush, U.S. District Court for DC,
    No. 08-1698-EGS, filed October 6, 2008. Second Amendment case for the right to openly keep and bear arms in intrastate, interstate, and maritime travel, in the form of a “National Open Carry Handgun” endorsement on my Merchant Mariner’s Document (ID card) from a U.S. merchant seaman’s point of view. Download and print my 600-page
    lawsuit at

    Click to access hamrick.pdf

    FOR BACKGROUND INFO SEE:
    http://AmericanCommonDefenceReview.WordPress.com

    http://www.rightsidenews.com/200811222725/editorial/the-great-birth-certificate-scandal-cover-up-of-the-2008-election.html

     Neither you nor Philip Berg or Andy Martin had standing to sue for Obama’s birth certificate.   I believe I have standing to file a motion for court order under Rule  25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for Obama’s birth certificate.

     I will have to file a motion to replace Bush with Obama as defendant
    asking for a court order for Obama to produce his birth certificate as proof of eligibility to hold the office of president of the United
    States because the question of Obama’s eligibility must be resolved.
    Who better than me as plaintiff with a Second Amendment as a human
    rights case?

    Can you email your complaint and the NJ court’s ruling to me?

  16. Here is a very interesting article on “natural born citizen.”

    http://federalistblog.us/2008/11/natural-born_citizen_defined.html

    In summary, you can be a natural born citizen, a 14th amendment citizen or a statutory citizen.

    If your father was a US citizen at the time of your birth, then you are a natural born citizen. Otherwise you are not. Obama’s father was a British citizen at the time of Obama’s birth, so he does not qualify as a natural born citizen.

    If you were born in the United States, AND subject to the jurisdiction thereof, then you are a 14th amendment citizen. Being subject to the jurisdiction of the US means not being subject to the jurisdiction of another country. Some countries claim you are their citizen even if you are born in the US while other’s do not, so the 14th amendment does not make all people born in the US citizens. British law in 1961 when Obama was born claimed jurisdiction over anyone born in the US to a male British citizen, so Obama was not even a 14th amendment citizen.

    This leaves only the possibility that he was a statutory (naturalized) citizen if he was born in Hawaii. If he was actually born in Kenya (which I doubt) then he would not even be a citizen, but an illegal alien.

    He is not qualified to be president under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5.

    In addition to the information in the above paper, consider this also:

    In print and widely read by the Framers and the citizens of this land at the time was a writing by Emmerich de Vattel, (1758) entitled “The Laws of Nations”. In Vattel’s work he defined Natural Citizen or Native as:

    § 212. Citizens and natives.

    The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.

Leave a comment