2008 Electoral College votes, Certification of Voters, State laws, US Constitution, Electors signed Certification, Certifications invalid, Obama ineligible, Violators should be prosecuted, Constitution violated

The ultimate objective of a presidential election to inaugurate a
constitutionally qualified president that as closely as possible
reflects the will of the people.
The states have been given the power and the duty to control presidential
elections by the US Constitution.

The pervasive attitudes of the state officers and election officials is
that they, incorrectly, have no power to qualify presidential candidates
and/or they depend on political parties to vet the candidates.

The political parties have evolved and changed since the creation of the
US Consitution and are given no powers. However, members of the parties,
as US Citizens have an implied duty to uphold the Constitution and party
officers typically have taken oaths as elected officials to uphold the
US Constitution.

Clearly, the intent of the US Constitution and Federal Election Law is
for an eligible candidate to move through this election process to allow
for a constitutionally valid vote by Electors.

All officers and election officials, most judges and most Electoral
College Electors were informed prior to the general election and
particularly prior to the Electors meeting and voting, of compelling
evidence that Barack Obama is not eligible to be president. Despite
these warnings, Electors met and voted on the basis of party loyalty or
perceived directives from the states. State or party policies dictating
how an Elector votes violate the spirit and letter of constitutional
and federal law.

Even though the manner of Electoral College voting in clearly defined by
the US Constitution and Federal Election Law, some states have included
explicit references to law in their Certificates of Voters that are
signed by Electors and state officers. Below are certificates from 2004.

http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/2004_certificates/

Alabama

“pursuant to the Constitution and the laws of the United States
and this state, certify”

Alaska

“by authority of law vested in us”

Arizona

“by authority of law in us vested”

Arkansas

“as provided by law”

California

“pursuant to the Constitution and the laws of the United States
and the state of california, do hereby certify”

Connecticut

“in pursuance of the Constitution and laws of the United States
and in the manner provided by the laws of the state of Connecticut”

Hawaii

“in pursuance of the Constitution and laws of the United States”

Idaho

“having met agreeably to the provisions of law”

Illinois

“as provided by law”

Indiana

“as required by the Twelfth Amendment to the Constitution of
the United States”

Iowa

“in accordance with law”

Kansas

“agreeably to the provisions of law”

Kentucky

“In accordance with the Twelfth Amendment to the United States
Constitution, and with sections 7-11 of Title III of the
United States Code”

UNITED STATES CODE

TITLE 3 THE PRESIDENT

Manner of voting

§ 8.   The electors shall vote for President and Vice President, respectively, in the manner directed by the Constitution.

US Constitution

Article. II.

Section. 1.
“No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
Minnesota

“In testimony whereof, and as required by the Twelth Amendment
to the Constitution of the United States we have hereunto set
our hands”

Montana

“agreeable to the provisions of law”

Nevada

“agreeably to the provisions of law”

New Jersey

“proceeded to perform the duties required of us by the Constitution
and laws of the United States.”

North Carolina

“by authority of law in us vested”

Pennsylvania

“agreeably to the provisions of law”

Rhode Island

“in pursuance of law”

South Carolina

“pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the United States and of
this state”

Tennessee

“pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the United States and of
this state”

Utah

“in pursuance of the statutes of the United States and of the statutes
of the State of Utah”

Virginia

“in pursuance of the Constitution and laws of the United States”

Washington

“pursuant to the provisions of federal and state law”

Conclusion

  • The US Constitution is clear on presidential eligibility and how
    Electoral Colleges Electors are to vote.
  • Ignorance is no excuse. Everyone involved was forewarned. Voting
    party line over law will not be tolerated.
  • Electors and state officers have signed or will sign Certificates of Voters
    for the 2008 Election. As you can see from the above, they will
    certify that they are aware of the law and are abiding by the law.
  • Kentucky gets the award for the most constitutionally clear wording
    and should be applauded for doing so.
  • There are consequences for false attesting.
  • One of the consequences is that the votes of many Electors are now
    null and void.
  • Impeachment, recall, firing, criminal charges forthcoming?

Constitution 101 classes will begin soon.

State officers, election officials, judges and, of course,
US Supreme Court Justices will be invited. Stay tuned for a
class near you. I suppose Washington DC should be first.

About these ads

51 responses to “2008 Electoral College votes, Certification of Voters, State laws, US Constitution, Electors signed Certification, Certifications invalid, Obama ineligible, Violators should be prosecuted, Constitution violated

  1. Lawdawg said that Berg would be distributed for conference on January 9. Today the SCOTUS web site said the same thing. How is Lawdawg getting all of his advance information? He was right in Wortcowski, Lightfoot, and Berg. I think he’s an insider.

  2. Let’s not try to figure out how he is getting his information, but just be glad he’s getting it.

  3. Yep..I have noted the same thing.He predicted the first denial of Leo’s case. I called him a soothsayer the other day. He claimed that Cort did not file a writ.This hinted at possible resurrection if papers were filed.I copied both his posts from two blogs. Take a review:
    Berg’s case is awaiting distribution to conference, which should occur on January 9.

    Wrotnowski has not filed a petition for a writ of certiorari, so no further action will be taken on this case unless one is filed.

    Lightfoot’s application for a stay was denied by Justice Kennedy. An order will issue shortly. Lightfoot has not filed for a writ of certiorari, so no further action will be taken on this case unless the application is refiled with another justice or a petition for a writ is filed.

    -Lawdawg
    December 15, 2008 4:17 PM

    Lawdawg // December 15, 2008 at 5:06 pm

    Berg’s case will be distributed for conference, but not until January 9.

    Wrotnowski did not file a petition for a writ of certiorari, so no further action will be taken on his case unless a petition is filed.

    Lightfoot’s petition for a stay was denied by Justice Kennedy – an order will issue shortly. To date, Lightfoot has not filed a petition for a writ of certiorari, so no further action will be taken on that case unless a petition is filed.

    -Lawdawg

  4. zachjonesishome

    Thank you CitizenWells for all your efforts. Zach

  5. Just when you think it couldn’t get any worse, look at the latest post on texasdarlin.wordpress.com

    Google: Obama’s Residence Linked to PSL Phone Number

    (PSL = Party for Socialism and Liberation)

    Say WHAT???

  6. Excellent summarization!

    I think 95% of ALL citizens should be required to pass a Citizenship test to vote in 2012, assuming we even have an election next time around…

  7. Has anyone else seen the train barreling through the countryside with the determined purpose of negating the accomplishments of the last 200+ years? It too has been making accomplishments over the last 200 years.

    The Jim Taylors have finally railroaded the Jefferson Smiths, who are left only with blogging.

    CitizenWells, I admire your hard work on America’s behalf and thank you for it.

    I know it isn’t over ’til it’s over and hate the pessimism I am feeling right now. But damn it! We’ve been railroaded none the less; as sure as that smug mug at: http://img.timeinc.net/time/photoessays/2008/obama_youth/obama_youth_04.jpg

  8. Thank you for all your help Zach.

  9. Thanks Citizen Wells. Keep the good work up.

  10. decentAmerican

    in case you all didn’t read yet,

    ginacobb.typepad.com has a very nice investigation, with clear documents, showing that Obama’s house is owned by, Rezko’s lawyer!

    Also, also, take a look at texasdarlin’s assessment of how if you google Obama’s address inChicago, it is linked to the phone number of the Socalist party!

    you can’t make this shit up, insanity.

    Another day, another mystery in the secret life of the PEBO trash.

  11. Everyone should remember one thing:

    “Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely”

    Obama feels he is Above all Law. He will be the source of his own destruction. Be patient..give it a little time.

  12. Katie, thanks for your post. That was priceless. I’m making it viral for my “inner circle.” These guys are going down! The American people will not be mocked. There is a “silent majority” out there that has yet to wake up. And, yes, some of them actually voted for Obama…

  13. Hi,
    just to make it easier.

    The links from decentAmerican // December 17, 2008 at 8:06 pm

    http://ginacobb.typepad.com/gina_cobb/2008/12/obamas-house-is-owned-by-rezkos-lawyer.html

    http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/12/17/google-obamas-residence-linked-to-psl-phone-number/

    Nanananah nanananah hey hey hey GOODBY!

  14. It’s just amazing to see all these courts around the country including the Supreme Court kicking these cases to the curb left and right.Especially when the cases brought forth are without a doubt **SOLID AS HELL**

    Obama has flat ass admitted on his site that he held “dual citizenship” at birth, and still these idiot Judges toss the cases aside?

    CW……Correct me if i’m wrong here, but i’m starting to believe the only way we’re going to see “ANY” justice in this country is to “TAKE IT”!!!

    I’ve read on a few other sites where folks have actually mentioned a **CALL TO ARMS**

    I mean what are we supposed to do if the jack ass’s that we’ve elected have the proof right in front of them and they STILL won’t do anything about it?

    Are we supposed to sit by like a bunch of mindless idiots and let a few dozen idiots run this country into the ground????????

    This is F***KING ridiculous !!!!!!!!!

  15. AOL poll asks – Do You Think There is Any Merit to the Controversy Surrounding Barack Obama’s Citizenship?

    It bears repeating – go vote on this poll and spread the link to all you know. Since yesterday morning, the “yes” votes have gone from 44% to 51% and now the state of IL is all alone in the “no” category (not by much, tho!) except for a few states on the east coast. For a good laugh, check out the votes for DC. Totally out of sync w/ the rest of the country. So what else is new?

    http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2008/12/05/hot-seat-obamas-birth-certificate/

    Any way we can get this message out is worth a few seconds of your time, and we’re all making a difference!

  16. We don’t let up.
    A dam break starts from a small crack.

  17. Citizen,

    You have already ensured that this crack is significant.

  18. CitizenWells in an earlier article:
    “Connor previously confirmed to WND that he told the FBI, months ago, when he initially was fired, that the bank and the Rezkos were engaged in “fraud, bribes or kickbacks, use whatever term you want,” to benefit the Obamas.”
    ———————————————————

    There are quite a number of actions Obama has taken over the past few years that would cause him some jailtime including the above house/land deal AND Michelle’s incredible pay raise (another pay for play) AND AND AND … won’t waste my time listing here what we citwellsreaders already know.

    My very strong gut feeling (which works really well at the roulette table!) tells me that SOMETHING will be fishy in Hawaii between Dec 20 and Jan 1.

    Remember when the Hawaii gov said the UNACCESSED birth certificate was sealed?
    We need to find out if the BC suddenly becomes ACCESSED while Obama is in Hawaii. Easy enough to find out.

    Like I’ve said before, the man has so many diseases that ONE of them is gonna git ‘em.

  19. This is copied from Gina Cobb.
    A post named “A Ray of Hope”

    From Judy Frank, a commenter at Texas Darlin. She wrote about her concerns regarding Obama’s eligibility to John Linder, a US Congressman from Georgia.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    John Linder replied:

    “Thank you for contacting me with your concerns regarding allegations that U.S. Senator Barack Obama is not a U.S. citizen. I appreciate hearing from you.

    This story has been percolating in the media for a number of months. Unfortunately, unless Senator Obama produces the documentation on his own, at this time, there is no way to verify if he is in fact a natural born citizen of the United States.

    On January 8, 2009, both the U.S. Senate and House shall meet for the purpose of counting and certifying the electoral votes. After the vote has been counted, the President of the Senate shall call for objections. It is at this time that Federal officials in both the House and Senate may object to the certification of President-elect Obama by alleging that he fails to meet the Constitutional requirements to serve as President of the United States. Please be assured that I will continue to monitor this issue very carefully, and I will act when appropriate and necessary.

    Again, thank you for contacting me. If I can be of further assistance in the future, please do not hesitate to call on me.

    Sincerely,

    John Linder
    Member of Congress”

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  20. Citizen Wells: Sorry about my comment coming up twice, something got stuck somewhere, I didn’t do it twice.

    Berlin Berlin: I just went to your Rezko lawyer /Obama house link – wasn’t surprised because I’d already heard it wasn’t in Obama’s name – and sent the link to Sean Hannity. Thanks.

  21. This is a pretty good read! Did Obama really go to Columbia??????

    http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2008/10/did-barack-obama-go-to-columbia.html

  22. http://online.wsj.com/video/stocks-today-a-bomb-shelter-stock/BDEB30E3-A438-4EA0-A6A7-DEDE7041F34E.html

    This is a reminder and a pretty sobering one.

    Everyone, and especially those with considerable responsibility have to be vetted thoroughly. Not all is as it seems.

  23. “…and most Electoral College Electors
    were informed prior to the general
    election and particularly prior to the
    Electors meeting and voting, of compelling
    evidence that Barack Obama is not eligible
    to be president…”

    Were the Electors informed in writing of
    the compelling Obama citizen problem(s)?
    If yes, can we find these written papers.

    Thank you and Good Luck,

    Frank Henry
    e-mail: fmhenry4@netzero.com

  24. This Kentucky resident may be proud of their wording, but she is very disappointed, even embarrassed for her state with the responses coming from Whitfield and Bunning.
    Mcconnell hasn’t even bothered.

    To have a fighter like Georgia’s John Linder would help me sleep better; I emailed a support letter anyhow for his statement that he would act when necessary and appropriate.
    Don’t you just love him!!!!

  25. Update–I didn’t write John Linder, but someone on Democratic-disaster.com did and posted that letter-

    Update, I received an email today and it was from someone who emailed his office, and his office didn’t return via email–the office phoned her and told her, yes, it was true, he was going to do just that–he may be our hero and I am circulating the account –make it viral and rub it in—I sent it to my weasel rep. and senators in KY.

  26. —– Original Message —–
    From: Hanen
    To: william odom
    Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 8:11 PM
    Subject: Re:

    John Linder to stand and object Obama at Electoral Count
    12/17/2008 | Autumnraine

    Posted on Wednesday, December 17, 2008 1:05:48 PM by autumnraine

    I read a post the other day that a Freeper got from Congressman John Linder, Georgia, stating that he would stand and object to Obama if he doesnʼt show proof of constitutional eligibility.

    I emailed Mr. Linder and asked if he did indeed write that email and if he was serious about holding Obama to task on something as serious as this.

    A few moments ago I received a phone call from Congressman Linderʼs office confirming that he intends to do exactly that and he is just as intent as us on verifying Obamaʼs eligibility.

    I told his staffer (very nice lady) that I was proud of him and that I appreciated his bravery as I know he is going against the tide with this.

    She said that she herself was concerned as she had to show full, long form documentation to even work in the building for a Congressman and we shouldnʼt be told to just take someoneʼs word for an office as important as POTUS.

    Anyway, I just wanted to let everyone know that at least one Congressman is standing up to this, even if the SCOTUS doesnʼt have the nerve to examine what would seem to be a reasonable question.

  27. @BerlinBerlin

    Notice the Congressman Linder says WHEN, not “if.” I will be sending similar emails to Ron Paul, and my district rep, Michael McCaul. As to Ron Paul, I’m sure I’m not the first, nor will be the last. As to my senators, Cornyn and Hutchinson, that may be a tougher nut to crack. Anybody here know of ANY U.S. Senator that may be receptive to this plight? What about Chambliss of GA., or even Webb of VA (highly decorated Viet Nam combat Marine, and one of Reagan’s Sec. of Navy)?

  28. I hope it doesn’t get so bad, and I’ll paraphrase I think Solzhenitsyn here, that the Left will only understand what they have voted for when they are kicked in the teeth by the Marxist boots they have invited in. Help me with that one, somebody. That’s what I’m feeling: keep up the efforts, but there will be no criticism brooked until each Obama supporter feels personally rejected, burned and/or attacked by him. Witness the reaction to Rick Warren anouncement today. Meanwhile the evidence mounts daily he is the most corrupt potus to be named ever in a third of the time it takes most politicians to get that dirty. Well, I suppose Chicago politicians break that average every year, with or without performance enhancing drugs. Anyhoo, if Barack really is guilty of all of these things, they are the ammunition at hand when his fans go rogue…let’s keep it readily available.

  29. Hey, where is Ohio on your list (grin)

    and story–copy–

    http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_page=2798&u_sid=10515098

    voted dem 1st time in 44 yrs….. NOO

  30. DIANEHNDS.
    Not sure. Letting dust settle.

  31. Frank Henry.
    Go to the Democratic Disaster site for starters.

  32. Since the SOS offices state that it is not their reponsibility but that of the DNC/RNC to determine eligiblity, has there been any lawsuits taken against the DNC for not proving BO eligibility?

  33. Berg’s included the DNC.

  34. I think we should keep secret the names of the rep or senator who might be willing to ‘object’ on 1/8/09 to avoid them being ridiculed, threatened or silenced.
    Meanwhile keep writing to them to urge them to do the right thing. Even they know this is the end of the line and they are the only ones who can stop the usurper on his track. We send them loud and clear messages and some one will hear us and act.
    Just blog to tell some one is willing, do not reveal their names.

  35. njresident.
    Wise advice.

  36. ComancheShaman

    CitizeWells, I am afraid that you are wrong about the Secretary of State having the sole athourity to certify candidates for placement on election ballots within each state. After researching both the duties of the Sec. of State and the duties of the Attorney General in my state of Arizona I have found the reason that Mr. Donofrio’s case was denied. Within the laws and Statutes of Arizona there is no regement or standard proceedure to which the Sec. of State must adhere to in his or her duty to certify a candidate. So, If you ask a judge to grant a stay of ballots or an election then you also must ask for some cause for that stay. If your cause is to have the court compel the Sec. of State to do her sworn duty. then the court needs a standard of action to compare what was done to certify the candidates in order to compel any further action beyond what was done and there is no such direction under the law set forth, so the judge has no legal grounds to press forward. BUT, in Arizona we , within the job description and state statutes, have a step that is required after the Sec of State has certified the candidates and formated the ballots, once this step is complete the ballot is transmited to the Attorney General of Arizona, Solicitor General, TO BE CHECKED FOR IT’S LEGALITY, and that is the athourity that has the sworn duty to preform the real investigation into the legality of candidates and referendoms.
    So if any more suits are brought against Secretaries of States they will meet the same fate as Mr. Donofrio’s because the Court’s hands are legaly tied, they can not legaly compel something that does not exist within the law. They can however compel the Solicitor General to make the required investigation to insure the legality of the candidates and ballot, INCLUDING SUPINA OF BIRTH CERTIFICATES !

  37. Once again.
    The US Constitution gives the states control over the election process through
    the Electoral College voting.
    Several of the states acknowledge this fact in explicit state laws.
    Not only do they have the power, they have the duty to uphold the Constitution.
    Failure to do their explicit and implied duties can result in the disenfranchisement
    of millions of voters, which has been at the heart of multiple Supreme court rulings.
    It is as simple as that!

  38. LawDawg is one and the same as Danny Bickell?
    (^_^)

  39. Richard Newton

    Seems Chief Justice Roberts is going to go right ahead and ordain BHO 44th president of the United States.

  40. This conspiracy is so vast. At a minimum the following persons are complicit – the mainstream media, the State of Hawaii Department of Health officials, editors of the Honolulu Advertiser in 1961, the United States Department of State, Occidental College, Columbia University, Harvard Law School, the attorney licensing authority of Illinois, the Annenberg Foundation, the University of Pennsylvania (factcheck), state and federal courts in Hawaii, Washington, California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Connecticut (and other states), Clerk Bickell, the Electors, the 69 million plus Americans who voted for Obama, the 79% of Americans who approve of Obama actions as President elect, Michelle Malkin, Sen. John Kyl, and more each day.

    Trust only Citizen Wells and that dentist with the on-line law degree from the unaccredited law school. If they are the last two to resist the conspiracy for Obama, don’t worry, they will prevail in the end.

  41. Of my goodness, I forgot the Supreme Court. Totally in the tank for Obama.

  42. Thanks Brian.

  43. You are welcome! Watch out for the black helicopters and the little men from outer space kidnapping our women. And, never, ever, let the facts get in the way of having an opinion! Remember the Constitution is what you say it is and anybody who doesn’t agree is a traitor, or maybe even a socialist, or perhaps the illegitimate son of Malcolm X.

  44. “There are consequences for false attesting. One of the consequences is that the votes of many Electors are now null and void.”

    Any supporting statuatory or case law for this statement?

    It doesn’t appear the electors failed to vote their pledge:

    http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Ray_v._Blair

  45. Pledges are simply contracts and are in violation of the US Constitution
    and Federal Election laws and are therefore null and void.

  46. CW says: Not only do they have the power, they have the duty to uphold the Constitution.
    Failure to do their explicit and implied duties can result in the disenfranchisement of millions of voters……………….

    An attorney once explained to me there is a term called ‘implied law’ in that if the inference isn’t there, common sense should prevail.

    When toddler’s diaper needs changing, it’s understood that you change it in an acceptable time even though no law is on the books for that particular action. Not doing so may cause an awful odor, harm by diaper rash, and in the extreme DCS charges for neglect and abuse for not using common sense.

    Given that reasoning, those chosen as SOS, Governors, Senators, Representatives, Electors have an obligaton to fulfill their offices in an educated, informed capacity that assures their understanding that ‘implied law’ is synonymous with common sense.

  47. Brian —

    I should laugh, but my brother-in-law flew one of those black helicopters for the Marines (and the CIA), and he was a patriot, and proud to protect this nation.

    He was diagnosed with Agent Orange from 2 tours of front line duty in Vietnam, and died last winter in his late 50’s.

    So, the laughing hurts! But, you’re such an imbecile, I really don’t care!

    As far as what the Constitution says, everything Iwrite is check, cross-checked, and verified.

    Perhaps you haven’t been reading, but really the role of SCOTUS doesn’t even begin until after Congress acts on January 8, 2009, so there is still plenty of time, and then they will only act on what Congress finally does.

    SCOTUS has left everything status quo, not deciding to act on any voter initiative. Status quo is good, because it means that everything decided prior to November 4, 2008 is alive, well, and kicking.

    That should worry you, because it’s the status quo that decisively defeats Obama’s “dual nationality.” Why? Because the second clause of Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5, SPECIFICALLY bars a “dual national” from qualifying for President of the United States. And, Congress knows that!

  48. I just read this on Texas Darlin……..I rather believe it……….nothing is going our way…….he has really snookered so many……

    on December 18, 2008 at 8:13 pm FeelingHoodwinked

    BTW, I listen to KFYI talk radio host JD Hayworth in Phoenix, AZ. He was a US congressman representing Arizona for many years. He said he has been receiving emails about Rep. Linder objecting to Obama when Congress votes. JD said he called Rep. Linder today, as he is a friend of his. Linder DENIED that he is going to object, so that is a total rumor. JD Hayworth is a reputable source.

  49. Bob –

    My copy of the Constitution doesn’t have that “dual national” language. Maybe I need a secret password to see the invisible ink.

    Clause 5: Qualifications for office

    No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

  50. Pingback: House Senate Obama judges et al require Constitution 101, Natural born citizen not equal to citizen, Right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed | Citizen WElls

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s