Hollister vs Soetoro, US District Judge James Robertson, March 5, 2009, Philip Berg, Hemenway, Obama not eligible, Col Hollister, Barry Soetoro, Judicial, Judge Robertson Memorandum, Air Force colonel, Obama not natural born citizen

“It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial
department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to
particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that
rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must
decide on the operation of each.”

“If then the courts are to regard the constitution; and the
constitution is superior to any ordinary act of the legislature;
the constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the
case to which they both apply.”
“The judicial power of the United States is extended to all
cases arising under the constitution. Could it be the intention
of those who gave this power, to say that, in using it, the
constitution should not be looked into? That a case arising
under the constitution should be decided without examining the
instrument under which it arises?  This is too extravagant to
be maintained.”

“Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the
constitution of the United States, if that constitution forms no
rule for his government? if it is closed upon him, and cannot be
inspected by him?” Marbury versus Madison

The following is from a Memorandum issued by
United States District Judge James Robertson
on March 5, 2009. The Memorandum is a response
to the Hollister vs Soetoro lawsuit.

GREGORY S. HOLLISTER,
Plaintiff,
v.
BARRY SOETORO, et al.,
Defendants.
“This case, if it were allowed to proceed, would deserve
mention in one of those books that seek to prove that the law is
foolish or that America has too many lawyers with not enough to
do. Even in its relatively short life the case has excited the
blogosphere and the conspiracy theorists. The right thing to do
is to bring it to an early end.”

Judge Robertson’s opening statement sets the stage for revealing
his non objectivity and bias.

“The plaintiff says that he is a retired Air Force
colonel who continues to owe fealty to his Commander-in-Chief
(because he might possibly be recalled to duty) and who is
tortured by uncertainty as to whether he would have to obey
orders from Barack Obama because it has not been proven — to the
colonel’s satisfaction — that Mr. Obama is a native-born
American citizen, qualified under the Constitution to be
President. The issue of the President’s citizenship was raised,
vetted, blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by
America’s vigilant citizenry during Mr. Obama’s two-year-campaign
for the presidency, but this plaintiff wants it resolved by a
court.”

Notice the ignorance or apathy of using words like vetted. Judge
Robertson goes on to say “plaintiff wants it resolved by a
court.” as if that is improper. Another example of those that
should be providing checks and balances passing the buck.
“The real plaintiff is probably Philip J. Berg, a lawyer
who lives in Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania, and who has pursued
his crusade elsewhere, see Berg v. Obama”

 

“That case was the subject of a scholarly opinion by a
judge who took Mr. Berg’s claims seriously –- and dismissed them.”
“Mr. Hollister is apparently Mr. Berg’s fallback brainstorm,
essentially a straw plaintiff, one who could tee Mr. Berg’s
native-born issue up for decision on a new theory:”

 

“Because it
appears that the complaint in this case may have been presented
for an improper purpose such as to harass; and that the
interpleader claims and other legal contentions of plaintiff are
not warranted by existing law or by non-frivolous arguments for
extending, modifying or reversing existing law or for
establishing new law, the accompanying order of dismissal
requires Mr. Hemenway to show cause why he has not violated Rules
11(b)(1) and 11(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
and why he should not be required to pay reasonable attorneys
fees and other expenses to counsel for the defendants.”

So now we have trying to uphold the US Constitution being referred
to as harassing. “Not warranted by existing law”?

Judge James Robertson. Which of the following apply to you?

Idiot
Incompetent
Biased
Anti American
Bought by Obama Camp

We would like to know.

The Citizen Wells blog demands for the removal of Judge James
Robertson from office. Please join us in this effort. Corrupt
or incompetent judges must be removed from office.

Complete Memorandum

Help Philip J Berg uphold the US Constitution

http://www.obamacrimes.info/index.html

About these ads

56 responses to “Hollister vs Soetoro, US District Judge James Robertson, March 5, 2009, Philip Berg, Hemenway, Obama not eligible, Col Hollister, Barry Soetoro, Judicial, Judge Robertson Memorandum, Air Force colonel, Obama not natural born citizen

  1. Ahhhhhhhh,

    Another judge ”sidesteps” and ”dances” around the hot potato of Obamas illegitimacy :)

    Nice to see our legal system working in stride with each other.

    How many lawsuits is that now, that have failed?

    I think at one time there were over 48 Federal lawsuits (i think i read that somewhere) and no telling how many in State courts.

    Every single case that has made it to the SCOTUS has been denied or put aside without comment.

    Can anyone say “Conspiracy Theory” ?

    Boy, if it was this hard to get any other case before a court, our country would completely fall apart.Can you imagine every court case in the country right now (including murder cases) never seeing the light of day because…..let’s say, the prosecuting attorneys “don’t have standing” to sue a murder suspect because the attorneys themselves have not suffered any harm by the accused?

    This is amazing ! Only in America !

  2. This judge is a disgrace to the judiciary and the constitution. He thinks he is going to get some big job from Obama or something. If he gets put into the supreme court by the usurper, he won’t have the job for life because he will be appointed by a foreigner.

  3. Pingback: The Right Side of Life » Hollister v. Soetoro: Case Dismissed, Attorney May be Sanctioned

  4. decentAmerican

    I fear it will be this way in every single case, no matter how the judge feels. No one….I repeat, NOONE….wants to go down in history as standing in the way of the first black President.

    Our Constitution in shambles, Lady Liberty in tears, our enemies laughing at us, and our economy down the tubes.

    Political correctness has destroyed us. Just like Abe Lincoln said…..that America is too strong to be destroyed by enemies abroad….if we are to be destroyed, it is from enemies within.

    It is happenning now. And we are helpless. A Kenyan has conquered our beloved country, and held us all hostage with the race card.

  5. He is not the only corrupt Judge. A majority of them belong behind bars. Same goes for cops that give tickets illegally.

  6. This attitude of self-importance and rules only applying to those not in government positions of power is a cancer that seems to have consumed the entire judicial, executive and legislative branches of government.
    I am sick to death of it ….something MUST be done soon

  7. I THINK THE REAL PROBLEM IS THAT NOW THE GOV”T(CONGRESS’COURTS & EXECUTIVE) NOW REALIZE THAT THE BRINGING DOWN THE EXECUTIVE WOULD LEAD TO LAW SUITS FOREVER. BUT WHAT THEY DON’T REALIZE IS THAT BY DENYING THIS WILL ALSO CAUSE FAR MORE DANGEROUS EVENTS.

    PS – MAYBE I AM WRONG A NO ONE IN THE FED CAN BE SUED. A LEGAL OPINION PLEASE

  8. BerlinBerlin

    “This case, if it were allowed to proceed, would deserve
    mention in one of those books that seek to prove that the law is
    foolish or that America has too many lawyers with not enough to
    do. Even in its relatively short life the case has excited the
    blogosphere and the conspiracy theorists. The right thing to do
    is to bring it to an early end.”

    Wow!
    This is exactly what the Obots do every single time.
    Not going into the issue itself, but ridiculizing it by calling it “conspiracy” and “an issue of the blogosphere”.
    Well, Obots call us preferably “racist” and such.

    These are the same people that will be crying out of self-pity when the shit hits the fan.
    Type of guys that push little children overboard to get into the life boat, You know.
    Too much power in undeserving hands.

  9. please post his address and contact information

    this liberal clinton appointed toon needs to hear

    from the real world and real people in America.

    Please provide his contact information.

  10. Folks,

    Don’t get upset. Get angry. Get yourself a literal black book of names. Add Robertson to the list.

    When the time comes, your black book will be used against them. Do not forget.

    DON’T TREAD ON ME!

  11. The issue of the President’s citizenship was raised,
    vetted, blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by
    America’s vigilant citizenry

    >>>no it wasn’t you freaking moron, a number of lawsuits were filed during the campaign and OBAMA side stepped the issues!! What pathetic lying fat rat bastard.

  12. BerlinBerlin

    http://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/robertson-bio.html

    Judge Robertson:

    Chambers: (202) 354-3460

    Courtroom Deputy:
    Al Richburg (202) 354-3182

    Court Reporter:
    Rebecca Stonestreet (202) 354-3249

  13. nawanawanga

    I was told the reason why the judge used the word “frivolous” was NOT because the Hollister case had a poor argument about eligibility, rather it has as a plaintiff an “old” Colonel who would not be called up in all likelihood. This is TRITE and not a valid reason for dismissal.

    WE ALL KNOW THE MEDIA WILL SEIZE UPON THE WORD FRIVOLOUS WHEN IT’S NOT RELEVANT TO THIS CASE.
    A frivolous suit would be “Move to Kiss My Ass” or “Move to have Catered Food” or something, THIS is not frivolous.

    ———–

    Hawaii Statute allowing for Certificate of Live Birth for a foreigner!
    [§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State. (a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
    (b) Proof of legal residency shall be submitted to the director of health in any manner that the director shall deem appropriate. The director of health may also adopt any rules pursuant to chapter 91 that he or she may deem necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birth certificates and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for completion of a birth certificate.
    (c) The fee for each application for registration shall be established by rule adopted pursuant to chapter 91. [L 1982, c 182, §1]
    Also, people forget that Obama’s lawyers have already admitted that whatever is in Obama’s bona fides would, “cause a defined and serious injury” to Obama and/or the DNC. During the Federal Circuit Court ruling on Phil Berg’s claim, Judge, R. Barclay Surrick, ruled that any objection or refutation had to be served within thirty days. The Obama team contented itself with a motion to dismiss the case and a protective order. In these motions, Obama’s lawyers argued that revealing the information (birth certificate, citizenship in other countries, college admissions records etc.) would “cause a defined and serious injury” to Obama and/or the DNC. They argued that revealing these documents raises a “legitimate privacy concern” and the above mentioned risk that “particularly serious embarrassment will result from turning over the requested documentation.” The source of that embarrassment was not specified. That’s why Obama fights the release of his bona fides — “particularly serious embarrassment will result from turning over the requested documentation.” — his own attorneys said so. http://israelinsider.ning.com/profiles/blogs/2018399:BlogPost:10858

    http://lamecherry.blogspot.com/2009/03/occidental-obama.html

    Now, why would Hawaii aid a known illegal of British birth in illegally obtaining a fake birth certificate?
    The answer is in 1961 the American public had not yet been providing welfare benefits to illegals. Hawaii had a large population of illegals who were low paid laborer (slave laborers some might say), but were a huge burden to the system in poverty and crime. The Hawaiian answer, as it was a Democratic state and still is was to start registering all those foreign kids by the hundreds of thousands, the purpose being to tap into all those federal hundreds of millions then which would profit the state. Poverty programs flowed funds into the Hawaiian economy. If one makes citizens out of illegals, then Hawaii converts what was once a debt into their asset by obtaining more funds.
    The fact is there are hundreds of thousands of Barack Obama’s registered in Hawaii. Not even a Republican governor sitting on this explosive mess wants any of this coming out. An entire state sold out the United States for filthy lucre, because they were importing Asian slave labor. That does not make a great headline. Nor did they probably ever expect a money train welfare illegal would somehow get himself installed as President, which would expose the entire Hawaiian fraud. Implying a gargantuan fallout, all of those records would have to be gone through and verified so an Obama repeat would not occur, in all 50 states. The nightmare would be the removal of Obama under Quo Warrantus which is being attempted now and 49 other states suing Hawaii for the money it would cost to check all of their records over the Hawaiian fraud. That is why Hawaii is in collusion with Barack Obama. They were involved in massive welfare fraud and do not want this coming out.
    With this kind of background, in families being “informed” of the opportunities involved in engaging in illegal citizenship, one Stanley Ann Dunham, “registered” Barack Obama’s birth in Honolulu. Barry Obama Soetero was tapping into the welfare system of Hawaii, and in knowing what how sublimely talented the Dunhams were at using the system, this takes us into Occidental College.
    Occidental, like many of the colleges in that 1979 period, was tapping into government resources of free money to “educate” foreigners. Gramma and Mama, realize they can get a free education for Barry since he is the son of Barack Sr. and therefore is a British subject.” But now all they have is the bogus bogus Hawaiian birth certificate making him American like scores of other foreign born Hawaiians. However, there is another layer to the rescue; according to the divorce records of Lolo Soetoro and Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro, Barry was adopted by his Indonesian stepfather Soetero. They tell Occidental this and provide Barry Soetero school records from Indonesia which also list him as a citizen of Indonesia, and Occidental pays for his school expenses with foreign student grants, as well Occidental gets a foreign student grant. Occidental now has a huge problem as it engaged in federal student loan fraud which gave them huge bankrolls to profit off of in exchange for Rothschild plans.
    At the very least in this, Barack Obama is guilty of federal money fraud. As Tom Daschle and Tim Geithner just said “Ooops sorry” and paid it back, it could end there for Obama in the foreign student loans IF he had not shown a pattern for the period from 1971 to at least 1982 in passing himself off as Barry Soetero, resident of Indonesia as an adopted son born of a father of British Kenyan citizenship, all to tap into the American money supply. Occidental College opens up the door to Barack Obama declaring in writing he is not American, but foreign. This progresses to Columbia, where Obama has also sealed away his admissions records yet again. And in 1980 at the age of 20, he goes into Pakistan once again on an Indonesian passport which signifies again Barack Obama is Indonesian since Americans could not get into Pakistan.
    Those records will prove he is an affirmed triple citizen of British Kenya, Indonesia and America, if not Canada registration too. Any part of which disqualifies him for President of the United States.
    There are federal records for these Obama applications for funding in the Department of Education. Recently, Mr. Barack Obama attempting to further smear George W. Bush in releasing Bush documents, has set precedent in revoking executive privilege, perhaps unwittingly so. Now, the Dunham, Obama, Soetero education files are open to the Freedom of Information act as all papers associated with a President are, as Barack Obama made this a presidential issue when he hired attorneys to cover up what was being hidden at Occidental College.
    This is a matter for the Justice Department as it is money fraud of college funds and it is a matter for the Republican minority in Congress to demand and hold hearings investigating this.
    Those records all exist and if someone destroyed them and they are missing, that is a federal crime of which Barack Obama is benefited by, as in he is then a guilty co conspirator in another felony.
    If you get money from someone illegally, and someone else burns the papers protecting you, you are just as guilty as the person who lit the match.
    That is how all of this ties together from Hawaiian welfare fraud, Occidental College student finance fraud and Barack Obama currency fraud defrauding the American public of funds and places of education for its own citizens.
    Russia knows all of this. Media outlets and others attacking “birthers” had better do a reality check on an issue they claim does not exist, because it was just proved it does matter to the people with nuclear missiles (Russia) aimed at America. The real world has just dismissed him as already not being leader of the United States. Obama’s eligibility problem is well-documented even in Pravda. The Russians just slapped the person in the Oval Office across the face today, as Obama gave them all they demanded while indicating he would sacrifice our allies. Every terrorist, every world leader just witnessed and noted what happened. They are coming now for America and this all traces back to the Occidental Obama.
    The time will come when the American majority ignores him. Then what will happen as growing numbers of military are already refusing to follow orders from Obama without his bona fides? Areas of America are already discussing not paying taxes and going gopher with their guns and survival foods.

  14. I’m calling all three numbers. I want answers.

  15. The judge was correct in his decision. I am just grateful he did not take judicial notice of the fact, FactCheck.org said BO is legit, which BO requested in his Motion to Dismiss.

    Both Berg and Orly insisted on using retired military as Plaintiffs. In fact, one of Orly’s plaintiffs was 77 years old! When I pointed this out to her, she replied, ‘Let them try to exclude him! He is important; he will make noise across the country!’ By doing so, they made a mockery of the requirement that the Complainant must present a “case” or “controversy” to the Court. Because the federal court is prohibited from issuing an advisory opinion. And if the Plaintiff is not in any real jeopardy of being recalled then, there is no such case.

    Berg should have known better; his only defense will be, convincing the judge he did not.

  16. Sorry; I should have said, Berg’s only defense against sanctions will be, convincing the judge…

    And I want to point out that I have been warning you here on this blog, especially those of you Orly still allows to post on her blog, that with every legally infirm filing, our cause loses more credibility. You credit these lawyers for trying anything and everything to ‘out’ BO; but now, you see the results of this reckless practice.

    I absolutely respect Berg’s efforts to remedy this travesty; but I hope he can figure out another way than going into federal court, to fix it next time.

  17. jbjd,

    It is clear you have vast legal knowledge and experience. At a guess (and no need for a response) you’re probably a judge. To boot you are probably a well known judge.

    I think it is difficult for your readers to fully appreciate the constraints you are in vis-a-vis any public appearance. The challenges ahead are probably unprecedented for most, hence your leadership is urgently sought. Thanks for what you do.

  18. HELLO! You can’t remove a FEDERAL judge. They’re appointed for LIFE and he’s one of our most popular and well thought of judges. I’ve appeared in front of him and he’s always been great. Alan Dershowitz was asked about Judge Robinson’s ruling and praised him. He also said that Judge Robinson was too easy on Berg. He knows Berg and his reputation which he said among lawyers is horrible, to say the least.

  19. citizenwells

    From MommaE blog radio:

    Hi,

    I just want to tell you that Phil Berg may be the guest on tonight’s show. He is working on something and it will depend on whether he can break away or not and if so he will give us all the time that he can. Please be prepared to call in and make your comments and ask your questions when the time comes, as his time maybe limited. He will be talking about what Judge Robertson did with the Hollister case and what the next step will be. He will be able to give us updates on what is going on with the other 2 cases he has also.

    All kinds of good things to talk about and it will be 90 minutes of hot topics, updates and fun. It should be a HOT, rocking show, as well as interesting.

    Please post this on your web site, blogs or any blogs you are associated with or have access to and send to everyone in your address book.

    Link, schedule, call in number and times for the Show is below!

    http://blogtalkradio.com/mommaeradiorebels

    Call In # 347-237-4870

    5:30 PM Pacific Time

    6:30 PM Mountain Time

    7:30 PM Central Time

    8:30 PM Eastern Time

    I hope to see you all there. There are 3 ways to listen to the show, they are as follows:

    1. When you get to the Show page if the show doesn’t immediately start playing for you,
    you can click on the radio on the right, minimize the page and listen while doing something else.

    2. You can enter the chat as a Guest and read what is being said while listening, if you do this please
    do not click on the radio, or the chat button on the right. Scroll down the page and click on the
    play/chat button in the box describing the show underneath my picture/

    3. You can register/log-in and chat while listening, by following the same instructions in number 2.

    The choice is yours.

    I hope to see you all there.

    MommaE

  20. N,
    Very interesting analysis of what HI has
    done and how that fits in with Obama.
    It sounds plausible and now, as Bush’s
    documents have been released by the
    Usurper, the U’s documents are fair game
    as well. Time is up, Obama, you’re being
    vetted this time!

  21. citizenwells

    Janis.
    Do some more reading.
    From Wikipedia:
    Twelve other federal judges, including Alcee Hastings, who was impeached and convicted for taking over $150,000 in bribe money in exchange for sentencing leniency.

  22. Janis,

    You better believe judges can be removed!

    This Robertson character is just another clown. Sure, interpleader is a wacky plead in this case. However, the “judge” (if you want to call him that) is unprofessional, pompous, and will have his day in public court when the time comes.

    Watch and see. Justices are not above the law.

  23. citizenwells

    Janis
    PS.
    Choosing Alan Dershowitz as your example is not a game winning strategy.

  24. Update of today’s PROTESTS against Usurper
    in Columbus, OH. Protesters on sidewalk
    in front of Aladdin Shrine Cntr. flanking the
    driveway in. Air Force 1 landed at airport and
    extra-duty Cols. police blocked access OUT
    of the airport for about 35 mins. Motorcade
    with 2 Pres. limos went quickly to the A. S. Center where Usurper gave teleprompter
    speech to the police recruit class, claiming his
    funding was paying their salaries. What he
    never admitted was that the recruits’ salaries
    are only paid through the end of THIS year–
    after that…. oh well…..
    ONLY about 25 people came to “greet” the
    Usurper’s arrival, BUT over about 50
    Protesters with signs “greeted” him at the
    Center. One protester had a LARGE
    “Don’t Tread on Me” Flag flying from his
    motorized scooter. The messages were
    loud and clear (if BHO had his eyes open
    and his ears cleared of wax). Police even
    equestrian police and sheriff deputies were
    everywhere (on all the bridges and overpasses,
    every 100 yds on the freeway, etc,). Helicopters
    overhead. In all it cost Columbus $100,000
    extra for this short amt. of “attention.” NOT
    WORTH IT! GET OUT OF HERE, BHO,
    AND TAKE YOUR ACORNS WITH YOU,
    SQUIRREL HEAD!

  25. Jacqlyn Smith

    Janis // March 6, 2009 at 7:40 pm

    HELLO! You can’t remove a FEDERAL judge. They’re appointed for LIFE and he’s one of our most popular and well thought of judges. I’ve appeared in front of him and he’s always been great. Alan Dershowitz was asked about Judge Robinson’s ruling and praised him. He also said that Judge Robinson was too easy on Berg. He knows Berg and his reputation which he said among lawyers is horrible, to say the least.
    ================================

    Janis—What does all your BS here have to do with justice and doing the right thing??? NOTHING! Berg and Orly are trying their best….what are you doing??? We are up against a THUG political machine…..we don’t even know the worst of it and probably never will but you can’t fault people who have principals and integrity for trying. You can probably put Larry Sinclair in that group also. Soetoro and THUGS including Joe Biden have done everything in their power to shut him up….and he continues to try to get the truth out!!! I say HOORAY for all of these HEROS….they have more guts than the ordinary citizen!

  26. Jacqlyn Smith

    Maddie—Thanks for the report. I was asking about it on the other blog. You are too FUNNY!! I like the take your ACORNS with you SQUIRREL HEAD!!lol

  27. Mr. Barack H. Obama is not the President, he is a usurper.

    It makes no difference where Mr. Barack H. Obama, Jr. was born. He can not meet the “Natural Born Citizen” requirement of our Constitution (Article 2, Section 1), because his father was not a United States Citizen.

    The Supreme Court clearly established who was a “natural born citizen” in the case Minor v. Happersett (1874). Justice Gray thoroughly discussed the definition of “natural born citizen” in his review of the Minor case. The Supreme Court in Minor adopted the Laws of Nations definition of “natural born citizen” as being a person born in the United States to “citizen parents” — this definition does not include Mr. Barack H. Obama, Jr., because his father was not a United States Citizen.

    Mr. Obama’s father was a Citizen of Kenya and a British Subject and not a Citizen of the United States. Therefore, Mr. Barack H. Obama, Jr. can not meet our Constitutional requirement of a “Natural Born Citizen” of the United States and is not eligible to be the President.

    Mr. Barack H. Obama is not the President, he is a usurper.

  28. Air Force Brat

    One interesting thing in Robertson’s Order: “native-born”. Perhaps Robertson doesn’t know the difference between the terms “native-born” and “natural-born”.

    jbjd, unless you are Justice Alito himself, lose the superiority complex. You come across like you think you’re God Almighty. Only YOUR suit is valid. Only YOUR suit is worthy. Only YOU have the answers. Everyone else is wrong, and YOU are right. It got old a long time ago. Either file the case yourself or shut the hell up.

  29. Air Force Brat An absolutely great statement! This is one of the best blogs around and is only interrupted by those who know everything , and yet do nothing but discredit those trying to break through this steel wall Obama seems to have built around himself and his plans to destroy America.

  30. Joy,

    jbjd is right about a military case as the best mode of action to take.

    However, this case will only be effective if the judicial system is working as intended.

    As we’re seeing now, it clearly is not. No case is going to be effective. Why? Because our federal government is an empty shell at the highest levels of authority.

    At the state level it’s a different matter altogether. We still have the power to make serious waves and that’s where we should be placing our efforts. When the time comes, more and more states will refuse to bow down to the almight federal government and war will begin yet again.

    I keep saying the word “war” because at the present time there does not appear to be any other solution to this neverending spiraling financial, political, and tyrannical heist against the U.S. people.

  31. jbjd,

    It is clear you have vast legal knowledge and experience. At a guess (and no need for a response) you’re probably a judge. To boot you are probably a well known judge.

    If true, it’s real easy to find out with the right hack or IT tech.

  32. The judges are arbitrary and capricious. They are simply convoluting technicalities and laws to avoid confronting the problem. Though I have no proof and probably never will have, I strongly suspect a large sum of money Obama used in his defense was bribery. Any one who would like to send this cavalier judge a copy of my little essay, feel free to do so.

    It my my personal frustration with the overwhelming number of corrupt judges that motivated me to write “Those Judges are Guilty”
    Please forgive me for posting it a second time but the essay seems to go so well with this specific topic.

    Those Judges Are Guilty

    A movie called Judgment at Nuremberg was produced and released in 1961. It was the true story of four German judges tried in 1948 for war crimes three years after the most important Nazi leaders had already been tried. These judges used their offices to conduct Nazi sterilization and cleansing policies. Since the cold war was heating no one wanted anymore trials as Germany and allied governments wanted to forget the past.

    Spencer Tracy played the retired American Judge, Dan Harwood who went to Germany to do the job. Burt Lancaster played Judge Ernest Janning, the one judge out of the four for whom the German attorney Hans Rolfe, (played by Maximillion Schell) most passionately defended as the “good judge” who by his sentencing did the least harm. The real life Judge Ernest Janning’s name was Schlegelberger. The story details the trial, the testimony from many victims, and the soul searching struggle of Judge Dan Harwood to reach a fair and objective decision—especially about Judge Hans Rolfe. Finally Judge Harwood renders his decision by finding all the judges equally guilty. Attorney Hans Rolfe, Judge Janning, and several other members of the court are shocked into a state of disbelief. Hans Rolfe had so beautifully pointed out what a benevolent and fair man Judge Ernest Janning was.

    The almost last scene shows Judge Harwood walking through the holding cell where the judges were detained. The American judge stops at the cell of the German judge who basically said nothing through out the whole trial and gives him a long look. Finally, Judge Janning says in a shocked whisper; “Why? Judge Harwood answers him in the wise old voice of Spencer Tracy;

    “You knew you were guilty the first time you sentenced an innocent man.”

    “In its decision, the Justice trial tribunal considered what it called Schlegelberger’s “hesitant injustices.” The tribunal concluded that Schlegelberger “loathed the evil that he did” and that his real love was for the “life of the intellect, the work of the scholar.” In the end he resigned because “the cruelties of the system were too much for him.” Despite its obvious sympathy with Schlegelberger’s plight, the tribunal found him guilty. It pointed out that the decision of a man of his stature to remain in office lent credibilty to the Nazi regime. Moreover, Schegelberger signed his name to orders that, in the tribunal’s judgment, constituted crimes. One case described in the decision involved the prosecution in 1941 of a Jew (Luftgas) accused of “hoarding eggs.” Schlegelberger gave Luftgas a two-and-a-half-year sentence, but then Hitler indicated that he wanted the convicted man executed. Although Schlegelberger may well have protested, he signed his name to the order that led to the execution of Luftgas. Another case cited by the tribunal concerned a remission-of-sentence order signed by Schlegelberger. Scheleberger explained in his decision that the sentence imposed against a police officer who was convicted of beating a Jewish milking hand would have been bad for the morale of officers. “

    One day every judge in United States who threw out a case against Obama asking him to produce his birth certificate and other documents based upon “Lack of standing” or any other technicality instead of merit, will be found guilty, too. They will be found guilty of breach of duty, failure to uphold their oath to protect and defend the Constitution, and maybe even conspiracy with the defendant, and possibly taking a bribe. Every judge who had the opportunity to do one simple request—order Obama to produce the documents that proves he is eligible by the requirements of the US Constitution to be a legal president—and failed to do so unwittingly became a traitor and a coconspirator with a usurper in the Whitehouse. This includes the nine traitors in the Supreme Court who literally had a clandestine meeting with Obama, a plaintiff in several pending lawsuits in the Supreme Court.

    Every one of these judges who failed to do the right thing when asked in his/her court is responsible the existing National Security and Constitutional crisis which now exists in America. A simple court order could have prevented the anguish and grief so many concerned citizens now suffer because of this question. Each and every judge knew he/she were guilty when they dismissed the case instead of making the simple order. They should no longer be permitted to serve as judges. Their names along with the case numbers and their actions should be posted on the inter net hall of shame and they should be sanctioned for crimes against America.

    “Richard A. Posner, federal court of appeals judge and one of the most astute observers of the legal scene, noted that it is not only German judges that might over-identify with popular causes. In The New Republic, Posner wrote:
    Perhaps in the fullness of time the growing of marijuana plants, the “manipulation” of financial markets, the bribery of foreign government officials, the facilitating of the suicide by the terminally ill, and the violation of arcane regulations governing the financing of political campaigns will come to be no more appropriate objects of criminal punishment than “dishonoring the race.” Perhaps not; but [the story of the German judges] can in any event help us to see that judges should not be eager enlisters in popular movements of the day, or allow themselves to become so immersed in a professional culture that they are oblivious to the human consequences of their decisions.”

    Unless Obama succeeds in his blue print to convert the Presidency into a dictatorship and totally turn America into an enslaved country, he will be legally removed from office along with a whole crowd of others. All will be indicted and tried for conspiracy, perjury, acts of treason, and more. It won’t make a difference if only ten people or ten thousand people conspired to harm America in the name of a 2008 Presidential election—all those who played major roles and knowingly supported Obama in spite of the fact he is not a “natural born citizen” will be found guilty and held accountable according to law. We will return America to a Republic under rule of law. WE will make certain these people will be held accountable for the crimes against America. We will not allow America to turn into another Nazi Germany. Every one who knew Obama did not qualify and ignored the Constitution is guilty. It is only a matter of time.
    Therese Daniels © 3/2/09
    http://www.blogtalkradio.com/usapatriots-shout

    http://usapatriots-shot.blogspot.com

  33. My Friends is there not a review board over This Guy ?what name again?NERO of bible fame! Have Our Judges become Emperiors!!! One favor he never questioned the defend<s name as not being Soretoro, I wonder why???

  34. Frankly, I’m surprised someone on the inside
    hasn’t accessed bobo’s records—at the college
    records office, the Health Dept., or any of
    the rest. The Ohio govt. workers didn’t
    take long to violate Joe the Plumber’s
    records.
    I don’t usually advocate this behavior, but in
    bobo’s case with the courts NOT working,
    other obvious options may be the only
    options. ..
    Other thought….when records are “sealed”
    who still has access?

  35. Hey, did you guys know that before you can get high level security clearances, such as an ATTENDEE to a private event where a president will be would have to get, the FBI and Secret Service do a comprehensive background check on you?
    Why do you believe that the CIA, FBI, NSA, Secret Service, Dept of Homeland Security and etc. DID NOT do a comprehensive background check on Obama? And that they would not know or would keep secret that he was not born in the US?
    When BHO first appeared on the political scene, Bush was in control of these national security agencies. Was he bought out by the Obama camp as well?

  36. citizenwells

    These security checks are not done on the president.

  37. I think New Mexica was saying that those checks would have been done on BHO before he became “President,” since he met with W while W was prez.

  38. Quo Warranto filed in CA5 (five) months ago, in October.

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2121007/posts

  39. Thanks CW, things seemed to be getting quiet for a few days.
    I applaud Phillip Berg, Dr. Orly, Citizen Wells, Steven Pidgeon, Leo, Mario, Dr. Keyes, and the list goes on and on. They and we choose to risk ridicule and are not deterred. From that attitude America was born and will be reborn, if we seek God’s will and His truth.

    It seems that this judge was more interested in attacking the credibility of the questioner rather than the question itself. He offered no response to the actual case, at least in what you have quoted.

    In my view, if the military law does not exclude a 77 year old man from being recalled to duty then he is entitled to an answer. Clearly the principle that any soldier should not be put in this predicament is the real matter. If a judge will not facilitate resolution of this, he only demonstrates his worthlessness. They should be lining up for an oppotunity to resolve these questions. Case closed.

    I am still in awe from the Kyl and Martinez comments. They, this judge, and all of Congress demonstrate the same lack of objectivity and unwillingness to uphold that which is good, and true. They cannot wash their hands of their guilt by making a statement that blames their negligence on the voters or on some silly internet “fact check”.

    These men have possessed wisdom and squandered it. They are to varying degrees like our affirmative action, American Idol Resident Obama, doing what is expdient.

    1 Cor. 1:27 But God chose what is nonsense in the world to make the wise feel ashamed. God chose what is weak in the world to make the strong feel ashamed.

    I think that is what will happen with these soldiers who are standing boldly to say the emperor has no credentials.

    The pattern, as with this judge, is to dodge the real principal and put forth some talking points to support fiction.

    The msm did it, voters did it, the electors did it, Congress did it, the courts are doing it. The important question that remains is “Will the people accept this nonsense” I say no.

    A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. — John Stuart Mill

    The good news is this. Many congressmen are on record with their idiotic answers to eligibility, because we asked. The two recent quotes prove the question is still alive and maybe gnawing at them, because we are still asking. And if this question of eligibility bothers some, it must be horrible for the ones who actually have a conscience and know beyond a doubt that they neglected their obligation. They could have killed the snake while they had the hoe in their hands. Now the poison is flowing.
    We all know this mess will not be fixed overnight, but keep asking the questions until the answers make sense.

    Robertson and company may want to consider this:

    Proverbs 17:28 ” Even a fool, when he keeps silent, is considered wise”

    Judge James Robertson. Which of the following apply to you?

    Idiot
    Incompetent
    Biased
    Anti American
    Bought by Obama Camp
    ALL OF THE ABOVE AND THEN SOME

    nawanawanga // March 6, 2009 at 5:52 pm

    WOW!!! . Please quote some sources. By circulating truth we can expose this mess. What you are offering is gold if it can be supported.

    I do my best to track this matter but was not aware of what you presented as the reply from Obama attorneys.

    Who cares about harm to his reputation when the big question is so much more important?

    God Bless, press on.

  40. He knows Berg and his reputation which he said among lawyers is horrible, to say the least.

    >>>they are suppose to judge the merits of the case.

  41. I’ve been trying to find a source to send to my doubting friends: could someone post a link to a site that clearly sets out the evidence that BHO is not a natural-born citizen?
    (Ideally with documentation – they’ve drunk deeply of the BHO kool-aid.)

  42. Obama’s so called birth certificate

    Registered #-NONE
    Registration district#- NONE
    Child’s birth#-NONE
    Father’s place of birth-NONE
    Mother’s place of birth-NONE
    Father’s occupation-NONE
    Signature of registrar-NONE
    Name of hospital-NONE
    Name of doctor-NONE
    Name of witness or registrar-NONE
    Raised seal-NONE
    Doctor’s license#-NONE
    State the doctor is licensed in?-NONE
    Signature of doctor-NONE

  43. jbjd
    ty for posts i agree with your assessment. Furthermore, in an effort to get these plaintiffs on board Berg, at the time had to go with what he had. He didn’t have the public educated for the facts. He had ONE retired military person.

    rather it has as a plaintiff an “old” Colonel who would not be called up in all likelihood

    >>>>>well, that is a judgement call. If that is what the judge based it upon, than that can easily be rebutted. Berg can say”
    look judgey wudgey, the miliarty and general public didn’t know the facts of the case until recently. The public never had the facts at all, as obama was hiding them– refer to his other case. Furthermore, as the facts came out more and more people are signing up in lawsuits and quo warrantos. Reference Orly’s 100 military people. Furthermore, there are now nearly over, what is it, 40? Lawsuits and petitions including 7 from STATE Legilatures. Also, we have an affadavit from paternal grandmother and an ambassador from Kenya as well as the Kenya government dratting up allegiances to USA. This issue will not go away until the documents are reviewed. They can be reveiwed in private by constitutional qualifed scholars if you like in regard to privacy issue. But that is not what OBAMA is claming at all. He has not claimed this is privacy. HE has claime everything under the sun. No jurisdicion, no standing, etc. While the othere candidates have revealed their documentation, what does he have to hide? Every single American when getting a new job has to prove that they qualify. Does OBAMA shit not stink? What is difference here? Is he above the law?

    I would stick it to this judge in the harhest of terms, and let him know that whatever he decides it will be appealed and that he is a piece of shit in no uncommon terms. The people are DEMANDING THE TRUTH. Millions of us. Mention the AOL polls while at it. It’s time to get angry, and tell him that the people will hold all these judges accountable !!

    That will force him to rule against Berg and take the issue to the next court.

    that’s my two cents of venting today.
    have
    a
    happy sunday
    God Bless

  44. JBJD

    Allow me to share some thoughts about some of the guest’s attitude about JBJD. (I know JBJD doesn’t need me to defend him, he is very capable of doing so himself.)

    We are all guests of Citizenwells wonderful site. I am especially grateful to be allowed to post here—it is cheaper than venting in a psychiatrist’s chair. I learn from all of you.

    Though we all come from a wide variety of backgrounds, we share one common denominator—a frustration with the fact we are all certain a coup de `etat has taken place and a usurper sits in the Whitehouse pretending to be our President. We, if wishing made it so—would have him arrested, placed, in hand cuffs, and thrown in jail—along with the entire gang of coconspirators with him. Everything I have ever read written by JBJD tells me he, too, wants the same as we do.

    JBJD appears to enjoy a legal background that I know is far superior to mine (I have no legal background. I am more into philosophy). His background may be superior to most of the writers here. Therefore, when he makes comments that are unpopular or seem counter productive to our goals, it feels like he is putting a wet blanket upon all our hopes and goals. Some people even find him “arrogant”. Such is not the case. He wants us to win. Sadly when people with backgrounds in law that are superior to our own, know from study and experience what works and what doesn’t. He isn’t trying to be a “know-it-all”. He is merely attempting to enlighten us and empower us so we will have the right tools to defeat the usurper. Please, dear people, let us be thankful JBJD shares his wisdom with us. For in the heat of conflict sheds the light of truth.

    America has been attacked and severely wounded. She is bleeding profusely from within and she needs every patriot to join forces to save her. Let us not waste valuable time and energy slinging arrows at each other. This is not a battle it is a war. We have many battles to win before we can win this war. As time flies, we need to become single minded, focused, committed, determined, educated, and united. Make no mistake by underestimating the enemy. There isn’t one group, attorney, or plan at this time powerful enough to defeat what has just happened to America. I trust with the combined creative effort of many we will become effective, powerful, and united enough to defeat him—but not just yet. This is why we must simply continue doing what we are doing with out demeaning any other person’s efforts. Each of us in our own way is powerful, creative, and purposeful. As long as we remain focus on one and only one purpose—arrest, handcuff, and remove Obama from office, we will succeed. JBJD is one of our best contributors.

    Usapatriots-shout

  45. ThereseDaniels,

    I will second the motion (again).

  46. I am not done, here’s more to my piece above, in case anyone is reading it.

    It’s obivous the judge has bought the obama kool aid, line and sinker. If indeed he is saying that the case if not worthy because the liklihood of the plaintiff is remote. THen I would add that to another growing list of OBAMA excuses. This excuse is spinning out. The case presented wasn’t about the “probability” of something happening, it is about “what to do if it did happen”. A BIG difference.

    The application of a fee or cost , is yet another attempt by the OBAMA team , obviously bending the ear of the judge, to obstruct justice. This is along the same lines of another case in which they said the same thing.

    The fact remains OBAMA has been spinning all these cases out without revealing a single document.

    IF Berg wants to extricate himself from the costs and the unallegedly unworthiness of the case he only has to say this “Judge I can prove the validity of my arguements if you order the defendants to release the documents that I requested. Until they are released for review the American people will not be served the justice that is warrented.” I would also present the evidence from BERG’s other case in which the defense admitted that releasing the documents would be damaging to OBAMA and DNC, and the affadavit from grandma, and the ambassador from Kenya’s words, and the fact that Kenya gov.t is in process of drafting up allegiences due from Obama.

    If he applies a fine or cost, I would again appeal and subpeona records in order get out of paying the damages in order to prove your allegations.

  47. Removing a federal judge is difficult and rare. The last time it happened was in 1989. In the history of the nation, we’ve had over 3000 federal judges, of whom 13 have been impeached, resulting in four acquittals, seven convictions, and two resignations.

    Citizens’ complaints are covered by the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980, U.S.C. 28 Sec 372(c). Note that a complaint being “directly related to the merits of a decision or procedural ruling”, is grounds for its dismissal.

  48. if every judge got removed for a decision that they make, whether we like it or not, there would be no judges

    well, wait a minute, we dont’ have any now as it stands? So what is the diff?

    My strudel is gone, what should I make now? :)

  49. Janis, Janis, Janis. Where to begin?

    Janis said, “I’ve appeared in front of him and he’s always been great. Alan Dershowitz was asked about Judge Robinson’s ruling and praised him.”

    Why do I doubt that you’ve “appeared in front of him,” unless perhaps as a defendant?

    Why do I suspect that you are an Obot who is somewhat less than truthful?

    Here’s why: While appearing before this judge, did you perhaps address him as “Judge Robinson”?

    If so, then I doubt that you would ever again forget that his name is actually Robertson.

    If you ARE a lawyer, and since you would understandably want a judge to think kindly of you, then you would make sure to know the judge’s name. Wouldn’t you?

    Otherwise, you wouldn’t be a very good advocate for your client.

    Calling the judge by the wrong name might prejudice him against your case.

    Oh, wait. I forgot. Judges NEVER have prejudices or biases. Do they?

  50. This is the first time I have been here. I am impressed with all of you. And I Thank Citizen Wells for this blog and the opportunity to exchange our knowledge and opinions. We all want to be rid of Obama. I’d like to make a suggestion. In 1772 Sam Adams started the first of the Committees of Correspondence in Boston. Letters were written and circulated throughout the colonies which resulted in pulling the colonies together. My suggestion is that we start an email campaign. We need to pull this country together. All of us know what is going on. Now spread the word. Email everyone that you can think of and ask them to email everyone that they can think of. What do you email to them? nawanawanga’s offering should be included. It answered many of the “whys” that I have had. It is excellent. In addition to that information feel free to include the following information in your email;
    A “Certification of Live Birth” document is not the same as an official “Original Vault Birth Certificate”. Obama is making a very specific play on words here. You need to pay close attention to the words (Certification vs. Certificate). Obama has specifically switched the last few letters of the Certificate word in an attempt to confuse the American public. The word Certificat”e” is being removed and the word Certificat”ion” is being dropped into its place. The casual observer would not even notice that the switch has been made. Obama appears to believe that the American public will not notice the switch or know the difference. The difference between the terms is dramatic to say the least. The word Certificat”ion” refers to the form which a state uses to create a “Certification of Live Birth”. The form used is an “AFFIDAVIT AND CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION FORM”. Anyone could request their state to correct their BC with this form and the state would type all the information in that you fill out on their form, WITHOUT ever even looking at your Original Vault Birth Certificat”e” of Live Birth. So what you really have on record is the amended version of your BC and unless you actually see the Original Vault Certificat”e” of Live Birth, you would never even know that there was a difference or even that an original Certificat”e” existed at all.
    The Hawaii issuer of the short form, and Obama, are only displaying on the internet what ever Obama typed into the Hawaii Affidavit and Certificate of Correction Form.
    Back in 1961 Hawaii allowed people to give birth to a child anywhere on the planet and then come to Hawaii and register that child, as long as it was under one year old, and then apply for a U.S. Live Birth Certificat”e” for the child. This is why an authentic Hawaiian Birth Certificat”e” specifically asks if the child was born in a “FOREIGN COUNTRY”. Obama’s Certificat”ion” of Live Birth document does not even ask this question, therefore providing further evidence that his Certificat”ion” document is not an authentic Hawaiian Birth Certificat”e”. There is a dramatic difference between Obama’s Certificat”ion” of Live Birth document and an Original Vault Birth Certificat”e”. An authentic certificat”e” from that era would contain a great deal of very detailed personal information and Obama’s certificat”ion” document does not carry that quantity or quality of information. An official Oahu, Hawaiian birth certificate from that era would carry many more specific details of a birth. Details like at least 33 specific information collection points, which can be located on authentic birth certificat”e”s from Hawaii in 1961.
    Details like the residency information on both the father/mother, both of their street addresses and their mailing addresses, a birth certificate number, sex and name of child, day & time of birth, city/town of birth, judicial district of birth, county/state/FOREIGN COUNTRY of birth, island name during birth, hospital name, number of children born, birth location farm/plantation, mothers type of work outside of home during pregnancy, [ father/mother race, father/mother occupation and date last worked, father/mother age, father/mother birth place ] date accepted by Registrar, date accepted by Registrar General, [signature of Parent, signature of Attendant MD, DO, Midwife, signature of Registrar, signature of Registrar General] This is the degree of specific personal information collected by the State of Hawaii in the 1960’s.
    Obama’s Certificat”ion” of Live Birth document carries only 14 of the 33 pieces of personal information. The document Obama has published on the internet carries less than half of the information normally collected by a standard Hawaiian birth certificat”e” application in 1961.
    Also if you take a close look at Obama’s published “Certificat”ion” of Live Birth” you will see a very dramatic difference between it and an authentic Certificat”e” of Live Birth from that era.You may view an authentic document at http://snarkybytes.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/hawaii-birth-certificate-1963.jpg
    If you compare Obama’s certificat”ion” document with the above authentic Certificat”e”, you will instantly see that an authentic Certificat”e” collects much more information and this one has crisp and clean type printing where Obama’s document carries a blurred “halo” around much of the printing. This “halo” typically results from “second rate” computer generated graphic editing. Many experts have concluded that it is a fraud based only on the ” forging halos “.
    People need to understand that Obama’s claim that he published his “birth certificat”e”, is a false claim. He published his birth certificat”ion”, not his birth certificat”e”. It is also NOT even a certified copy of his authentic birth certificat”e”. It is an official certificat”ion” of Obama’s birth in Hawaii by the person in charge in Hawaii. It is printed on Laser paper, which means its BRAND NEW, and not from 1961, the year he claims to have been born.
    What you see on the internet simply states that Obama was born (or showed up) in Hawaii according to whoever printed out the form. It is a Certificat”ion”, not a Certificat”e” of Live Birth, which is TOTALLY DIFFERENT.
    Back in 1961 the state of Hawaii allowed parents to apply for and receive Birth Certificates for their children even if they were born in a FOREIGN COUNTRY. The parent just listed the foreign country on the form and the certificat”e” was issued. This is why Berg was requesting to see Obama’s Original Vault Certificat”e” of Live Birth, it is because he suspects that the foreign country of birth BOX has Kenya marked in it. If this is the truth Obama would be a Natural Born Citizen of the United Kingdom or Kenya and could NOT be a Natural Born Citizen of the U.S. What Obama has published is not even as good as a drivers license and would not work for an ID even on a cruise ship or going to Mexico. Again, there is good reason it wouldn’t work and that is because you can actually request a state to correct your BC with an AFFIDAVIT AND CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION and they typed all the information in that you filled out on their form, without ever even looking at your Certificat”e” of Live Birth. So what you really have on record is the amended version, and unless you actually see the Original Vault Certificat”e” of Live Birth, you would never even know that there was a difference or even that an original certificat”e” existed at all.
    The issuer of the short form, which Obama is displaying, is simply printing out whatever was typed into the computer from a Certificate of Correction Form sent to them by Obama. This is the reason for Obama’s document to be listing only 14 out of 33 points of information.
    I find it to be absolutely incredible that Obama actually believes the American public does not understand the possible fraud he may have committed within the fabrication of his Certificat”ion” document, and his direct inference that it is his official Birth Certificat”e”. It is not his Certificat”e” as he claims, it is in fact only a Hawaii Certificat”ion” of the information he wants the world to believe.
    There is significant evidence that Obama’s birth certificat”ion” image that the DNC claims to be genuine, is, in fact, a rather clumsy forgery. Just type “Obama birth certificate forgery” into your favorite search engine and read all about it. Don’t be fooled by the links to the multiple “Stop the Smears” websites – those sites contain the images of the birth certificat”ion” document whose authenticity is in question. If Obama wanted to put the controversy to rest, would be to immediately produce his Original Vault Birth Certificat”e” for the courts examination.

    Now that you have this information you can use it in emails to explain to people who do not understand what is going on. And, we need a rational, straightforward, fact filled website to direct them to for those who want more information or who have questions that they would like answered. It could list all of the blogs and websites that are discussing the situation. Does anyone have an opinion as to what website would fill that criteria? Possibly a new website should be designed. I am not a webdesigner but possibly one of you has that training or knows someone who does who would want to set up the site. At the very least, start emailing everyone you can think of. We need to rattle the MSM. They need to hear the rumble in this country of millions of people talking about this, asking questions and demanding answers.

  51. Pingback: Lt. Col. Lakin waives Article 32 Hearing | The Post & Email

  52. Pingback: Hollister v. Soetoro aka Barack Obama update and history, Judge James Robertson biased or incompetent, Bias or conspiracy? | Citizen WElls

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s