Charles Kerchner, Obama can and should be removed from office, Popular Election Does Not Trump or Amend Constitution

Charles Kerchner, Obama can and should be removed from office, Popular Election Does Not Trump or Amend Constitution

From Charles Kerchner, plaintiff in Kerchner v Obama.

For Immediate Release – 19 November 2010

Unconstitutionally, Ineligible Elected & Seated State & Federal Officials Can and Have Been Removed. A Popular Election Does Not Trump or Amend the Constitution
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/unconstitutionally-elected-seated-state.html
Ineligible and Unconstitutionally Elected & Seated State & Federal Officials Can and Have Been Removed. A Popular Election Does Not Trump or Amend the Constitution  by: CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)

Obama is NOT Article II constitutionally eligible to be the President and Commander of our military. Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen” to constitutional standards. Obama’s father was NOT a U.S. Citizen. Obama’s father was not an immigrant to the United States. Obama’s father was a foreign national, a British Subject. Obama is the child of an alien father who was sojourning in the U.S. attending college. Obama was born a British Subject via his father and is still such to this day. Obama has never conclusively proved he was born in Hawaii. Obama’s paternal family in Kenya, Kenyan government officials, and newspapers in Kenya say he was born in Kenya. Obama’s maternal grandmother likely falsely and illegally registered him as born in Hawaii to get him, her new foreign-born grandson, U.S. Citizenship.

History shows us that a popularly elected, but ineligible, chief executive in the executive branch of a government can be legally and constitutionally removed from office, e.g., Governor Thomas H. Moodie of North Dakota was a prime example. After he was sworn in and serving as Governor, the North Dakota State Supreme Court ordered Governor Moodie removed from office, after it was determined that he was constitutionally and legally ineligible to serve in the office to which he was popularly elected.
http://history.nd.gov/exhibits/governors/governors19.html

Also, two U.S. Senators although popularly elected and sworn in to the U.S. Senate were subsequently removed from office after it was learned that they were NOT constitutionally eligible when they were elected.
Albert Gallatin [U.S. Senator seating unconstitutional and annulled]:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Gallatin
James Shields [U.S. Senator seating unconstitutional and annulled]:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Shields

Thus it is very clear that winning a popular election does not trump, amend, or nullify the constitution of a state or the U.S. federal constitution. Obama is not constitutionally eligible to be the President and Command in Chief of the military and should be removed from office and his election, confirmation, and swearing in annulled.

Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Commander USNR (Retired)
Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner v Obama & Congress
Please if you can, visit this site and help the cause:
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
####

About these ads

34 responses to “Charles Kerchner, Obama can and should be removed from office, Popular Election Does Not Trump or Amend Constitution

  1. If only the supreme court would hold up the constitution and do their job in having the usurper removed ASAP. I have been very disappointed and discouraged for the past two years having all these lawsuits thrown out of court. Hopefully, the two hags bo put in there will be recused because they are biased and at least Kagan is in on the cover up of bo’s ineligibility.

  2. Aussie,

    Thanks for your response at the end of the last thread.

    Spot on!
    :)

  3. I’m confident Mr. Apuzzo has secondary sources for those wikipedia articles.

    Methinks they’ll be going bye bye very soon.

  4. Interesting details found on the Wiki sites,

    Both Senators went before the senate for voting before they were removed.

    GGrrrrr…

  5. TSA officer charged in boy’s kidnap attempt – Police in Idaho say man also possessed documents for 5 separate identities

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12302041/

    - Child rape charge rocks TSA

    http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view.bg?articleid=1238602

  6. TruthSeeker | November 19, 2010 at 6:12 pm |

    You are welcome and thanks for making me smile :)

  7. http://www.wbtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=13534628

    Cancer surviving flight attendant forced to remove prosthetic breast during pat-down

    “I did not take the name of the person at the time because it was just so horrific of an experience, I couldn’t believe someone had done that to me. I’m a flight attendant. I was just trying to get to work.”

    “There are blowers and there are dogs out there that can sniff out bombs,” she says. “There’s no reason to have somebody’s hands touching your body parts.”

  8. Good Evening, Free Speech,

    From the last thread: Your post near the end of the thread asked about safety and the radiation contained in those &^%$# airport scanners.

    My unit certifies X-ray equipment, mammogram equipment, etc. My boss said that the inspectors we have on board are checking to see exactly what kind of radiation dose travelers are exposed to in those scanners. This is of particular interest to my group as well as the traveling public, because those scanners *must* be certified, federal or not.

    I wonder if they’re certified and if so, who was the certifying authority?

    Will post as soon as we get an answer.

  9. November 23, 2010 marks a fork in the road for the future of America of more than historic proportions — perhaps on par with events leading to the Civil War. To date, virtually all federal and state courts where actions have been brought seeking decision on the meaning of the Constitution’s Article 2 “natural born citizen” clause as a prerequisite for Barack Obama to be a lawful President and Commander in Chief of the United States (Mr. Obama having been born to a father of British/Kenyan nationality and father not a citizen of the United States), have been shut down, never getting beyond the issue of standing. To date, courts have very strategically (narrowly if not artfully) characterized and applied law and legal procedure steadfastly to prevent the question from ever rising to the merits — this on a host of different types and classes of plaintiffs, causes and defendants — admittedly under the most intensely implicit (if not more) pressure to do the same.

    The national media (some say our 4th branch of government) has aided and abetted the avoidance by mischaracterizing this as a “Hawaii birth” a/k/a “birther” issue which is nothing more than a “red herring” in that the issue for Article 2 “natural born citizen” is Mr. Obama’s father. Moreover, the legal community has aided and abetted the avoidance by mischaracterizing the 1898 Supreme Court Case, Wong Kim Arc, which dealt with the meaning of “citizenship”, not the meaning of “natural born citizen” under Article 2.

    November 23, 2010 may very well be the last chance for the Judicial Branch realistically to take up the issue, this on a case of legal standing solidly presented by Attorney Apuzzo and Commander Kerchener. If the Court finds no standing here, by a narrow interpretation of the same or otherwise, coming after all the rest of the “no standing” cases, it is doubtfull this important Constitutional issue can and will be resolved in any court of law. The question will nevertheless continue to fester, at tremendous national cost, never to abate, potentially to reach crisis stage, and in any event to undermine the structure of our Constitutional Republic.

    It is more than chilling and says volumes that NOT ONE member of Congress will publicly speak on this or, better yet, since the Congress of the United States has more than a vested interest, opine if not as a “friend of the court” at the Supreme Court, in the court of public opinion — BEFORE the Supreme Court convenes on November 23, 2010.

    The world is (should be) watching!

  10. Hi, Sue K – Always glad to read your posts! You mentioned that your boss said that inspectors would be looking into the radiation aspects of the scanners. I read somewhere recently that the equipment must be set properly with great care in order to ensure that there is not an excess level of radiation.

    It seems that whoever is involved in reviewing them should take that into consideration also. Probably all of us have heard stories about people who have had x-ray treatments and were accidently given massive doses which did great harm, simply because due diligence was lacking. Considering what we have heard about the caliber of TSA agents (some “ex” or current criminals) and their lack of proper training, we have a right to be dubious, to say the least.

  11. GBAmerica | November 19, 2010 at 9:08 pm |

    Hi GB,

    Thanks for this disgusting vid.

    I have a prediction: The first woman in a burkha who only has to have her head and shoulders ‘patted down’ will cause a revolt like we’ve never seen.
    Toddlers and nuns are being groped yet, the group that has caused all the problems can get away with only their head and shoulders being done? That’ll be the final straw.

    I’ll be waiting for this…

  12. It must always be remembered that we only have Obama’s word for who his father was (how credible is that?). What if Barack Obama turns out NOT to be Obama’s father? What then?! It could turn out that he is indeed a “Natural Born Citizen” with a Citizen Father and Mother and his whole nativity story a line of BS and he is an even BIGGER FRAUD than most are now thinking. This story could have many endings.
    ELmo

  13. Cabby – AZ | November 19, 2010 at 10:03 pm |

    Hi Cabby,

    Good to read you, too :).

    Yes, my group is concerned not only with the settings, but also the *kind* of radiation those things emit. Radiation burns are a reality and very nasty, aside from the fact that it enters your system and can cause all kinds of problems.

    We’re wondering if the gub’mint bothered to have the scanners certified at all because well, they’re the gub’mint and we all know that they’re above the law, don’t we?

    TSA agents. Those I’ve encountered have been ignorant and rude, even though most of us are cooperative passengers. When you consider that their average salary is 23K/year, you get what you pay for. If you want professionals, pay them a living wage! If you ask me, we’d be far better off with good private security companies rather than these low-life morons.

    I can’t help but think that Mr. Nappy Incompetano (I’m borrowing from OldSalt, who calls Robert Gibbs ‘Miss Gibbs’) is in a back room somewhere looking at all the scans of naked people. Can’t get that visual out of my head.

    In the meantime, the situation at airports continues to escalate. Waiting for the breaking point.

  14. SueK | November 19, 2010 at 10:19 pm |
    Thanks for the good information! Yeah, I agree about “Mr. Nappy Incompetano” (good name – LOL) possibly being in a back room “reviewing” scans….Hmmm, after all, there would have to be “inspections” of how the process is working. Right? Doesn’t it all make you sick?

    I recently read a surprising article by Emmett Tyrrell, Editor-in-Chief of the conservative American Spectator, who blamed Drudge for so-called hype about the airport debacle. He really debunked it all, but most of the comments were ferociously opposed to his opinion. For the most part, conservatives, as well as some others, are strongly upset.

  15. SueK | November 19, 2010 at 8:51 pm | Good Evening, Free Speech,

    From the last thread: Your post near the end of the thread asked about safety and the radiation contained in those &^%$# airport scanners.

    My unit certifies X-ray equipment, mammogram equipment, etc. My boss said that the inspectors we have on board are checking to see exactly what kind of radiation dose travelers are exposed to in those scanners. This is of particular interest to my group as well as the traveling public, because those scanners *must* be certified, federal or not.

    I wonder if they’re certified and if so, who was the certifying authority?

    Will post as soon as we get an answer.

    —————————————————————-

    Thanks. No radiation is good especially for people who have had skin cancer or who are predisposed to skin cancer.

  16. I JUST FINISHED READING THAT ALL U.S.A AIRLINE PILOTS WILL
    BE EXEMPTED FROM –”RADIATION SCANNERS AND PAT DOWN SEARCHES. I HOPE THIS IS TRUE—-WILL POST WEBSITE LINK IF I FIND IT AGAIN.AT LEAST IT IS A START TO “BANISH”THESE TERRIBLE ACTIONS AND I BELIEVE “UNCONSTITUTIONAL” !!!!!!

  17. Cabby – AZ | November 19, 2010 at 10:42 pm |

    Cabby, the whole business makes me sick! Back in the day, I was an airline rat…late 1970s. If you recall, that’s when the hijackings to lovely spots like Beirut started. Working for an international carrier was a hoot, to say the least. The solution to many of the potential hijackings was to storm the aircraft and take ‘em out; now, we treat them with kid gloves so we won’t offend any ‘group.’ Horse puckey! Take the bastids out, and be done with it!

    Ya, I read old Emmett. Let’s play the blame game again. This has nothing to do with Matt Drudge, or any other media outlet who has the stones to report it; it’s what’s happening, whether Emmett wants to admit it, or not.

    I’ll tell ya, if it were me encountering a gropy TSA agent, I’d go the route of Mr. Christina of CT and perform a good old World Wrestling Federation smackdown on the fool. Arrest would be well worth it; I know you’d bail me out :).

  18. SueK | November 19, 2010 at 11:11 pm |
    Arrest would be well worth it; I know you’d bail me out .
    ****************************
    You bet I would! My flying days have been over for some time, but I was imagining what it would be like to be subject to the “pat-down”. This I can say for sure, I would not stand there and take it like some must do.

    Even as we often have to wait a long while in the post office, I marvel at the patience of so many while a really SLOW clerk dawdles around with a customer as to what kind of stamps he wants when there may be as many as ten waiting in line. It is great to be nice and pleasant, but that touchy-feely stuff would be off limits for me. Yes, this will reach critical mass at some point. It is just a matter of time.

  19. Cabby – AZ | November 19, 2010 at 11:26 pm |

    Thanks, Cabby…and I have bail money for you, too!

    If I ever got the pat down at the post office, I’d quit eBay; no money order for antique salt and pepper shakers is worth it. And I’ve never understood the stamps thing and why some people *must* have the Elvis stamp; you stick it on the letter and it goes. You never see it again. Who cares?

    As Americans, I think we are extraordinarily patient for the most part; our patience wears thin, however, with invasive searches for no reason on this good earth except to aggravate and intimidate. It’s just a matter of this ‘administration’ pushing people’s buttons. Truth be told, I don’t think I’d attempt to push too many more…

  20. All top military officers better get a “change of conscience”. Order the military to surround the White House and demand the “USURPER” to “resign” immediatly or take him out in handcuffs !!
    ”WHERE IS OUR MILITARY FOR GOD’S SAKE” ??????
    I UNFORTUNELY THINK THIS IS OUR ONLY SOLUTION !!!!!!!
    What ever happens,happens——====WE CAN’T LOSE OUR REPUBLIC !!

  21. Free Speech | November 19, 2010 at 10:49 pm |

    Not only the dermal effects, FS, but the damage radiation can do to internal organs.

    I wear a personal dosimeter at work which is analyzed every 3 months to determine the dose of radiation I’ve been exposed to by virtue of my employment. If those numbers spike, I need specialized medical treatment. What you can’t see can indeed harm you.

    Remember Chernobyl and the horrible effects that incident had on the human body and still has to this day? Sometimes, the effects from radiation are not felt for years, and therein lies the danger.

    It’ll be interesting to see the type of radiation those scanners use and in what dose it’s being delivered. Will work on this next week.

  22. http://www.westernjouralism.com/elena-kagan-tied-to-obama-birth-certificate/ read about how elena kegan stopped the supreme court from investingating obmama that is why she got elected to the supreme court pay back to obama

  23. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers/kagan.asp
    snoops caught ling about kagan part she played in supreme court not hearing orly complaints on obam elligiblility

  24. I found out the reason I am an only child is because of the radiation my father received after a back injury while serving in the Navy during World War II. I don’t know how much, but the doctors knew it was enough to make him sterile.

  25. I’ve re-read Attorney Apuzzo’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari for Kerchner now that the Nov 23 date is approaching. The thing that hits me is that this magnificent piece of work is and will be historic for either of two reasons: (1) as the basis for address by the Supreme Court or (2) as the basis for redress by the people.

    I pray, as I am certain Mr. Apuzzo and Commander Kerchner do, that the document is historic for the first reason, and not the second. But, either way, it WILL be historic.

  26. SueK | November 19, 2010 at 11:42 pm |
    f I ever got the pat down at the post office, I’d quit eBay; no money order for antique salt and pepper shakers is worth it.
    *********************************
    Hey, I just got up and had a good laugh! I can relate to the eBay thing, because about a month ago I ordered some gifts through it. As you know from my past posts the whole computer thing is only about a year old to this old-timer, and I’ve been delighted to see what good bargains there are on eBay and the internet in general. In fact, I’ve done almost all Christmas shopping on-line this year. So the stuff has been rolling in at the post office.
    You know, it would never surprise me if the time came when this pat-down procedure WOULD be employed at the P.O., considering that it is a government agency. Wow! We had better wake up, folks!

  27. “OBAMA’S STEALTH REPARATIONS”

    By: Paul Sperry
    FrontPageMagazine.com
    Tuesday, October 28, 2008

    Excerpt:

    “Obama himself has said more needs to be done to “cleanse America of its original sin.” He said he cannot “brush aside the magnitude of the injustice done, or erase the ghosts of generations past, or ignore the open wound, the aching spirit, that ails this country still.”

    The 100% Immediate Urgent Emergency Highest Level USA National Security Disaster, 100% Extreme & 100% Massive Daily Serial Criminal, 100% Daily Con-Man Madman, 100% Unstable & Completely Unfit, 100% Constantly Lying Taqiyya Practicing Radical Islamic Muslim Con-Man, 100% Drug Addict who is a 100% Delusional & Insane, Sociopath, Psychopath, 100% COMPLETE Foreign Imposter, 100% Complete FRAUD, who is called Barack Obama alias Barry Soetoro Soebarkah, is 100% Truly Today a 100% Illegal Immigrant, & a 100% Illegal Alien in the USA, & Truly a 100% Foreign Terrorist Usurper who is Truly & Literally an Undocumented Indonesian Usurper, who is Truly a 100% Enemy Combatant Of War against the USA, & a Foreign Born Domestic Enemy Terrorist, Kenyan Born Communist/Fascist/Marxist who is Literally Working Daily To Overthrow the USA Government by orders of the Totalitarian Dictator Foreign & Domestic Enemy Leaders of the Islamic Muslim/
    Sharia Law & the Communist/Fascist/Marxist, New World Order/One World Government Dictator Leaders Barry Soetoro Soebarkah alias Barack Obama is working with in a Declared War against the USA.

    Here are more of the Foreign Terrorist Usurper, Foreign Enemy Combatant of War against the USA, Barry Soetoro alias the Massive Daily Serial Criminal, Foreign Con-Man, Terrorist Usurper, Barack Obama’s other Anti-American words against the United States Of America here:

    http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=32892

  28. I was surfing around the web a couple of days ago and briefly scanned an article that said that Dick Cheney was connected in some way to a company that manufactures the machines that are used to scan people at airports. Does anybody know how to search for this information? I have been unable to find it again. He has a high up job connected with this company, it was not about being a stockholder.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s