Obama eligibility, Natural born citizen, Obama birth certificate and college records, Simple question

Obama eligibility, Natural born citizen, Obama birth certificate and college records, Simple question

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

“I discovered this article, folded away among my BIRTH CERTIFICATE and old vaccination forms, when I was in high school,”…Obama, “Dreams of My Father”

I have been asking the simple question about Obama going to great lengths to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records for many months. Apparently some folks are confused about this. They mistakenly assume (assuming is one of my pet peeves) that the birth certificate issue is my main focus. They are wrong as many assumptions are.

The hidden birth certificate and college records are but puzzle pieces in the larger picture of many years of Obama deception. The reason that I pose the simple question is that it is non debatable by rational people. There is only one answer, one conclusion to be drawn from the question. Obama is hiding something(s). It is the “deer in the headlights question.” I strongly suggest that you use it. I used it yesterday.

It is clear that Obama is not a Natural Born Citizen for at least one reason and probably more. His father was a Kenyan and therefore British citizen. Some have debated that Natural Born Citizen was not defined in the US Constitution. The answer to that is simple. Among educated people of that era, it was understood that to be a Natural Born Citizen, one had to be born of two citizen parents.

An analogy is presented in the movie “A few good men.” Tom Cruise, portraying a military defense attorney, questions a Marine witness in response to the prosecution attorney stating that “code red” was not mentioned in the Marine Handbook. Cruise asks the witness if mess hall was listed in the handbook. The witness responds that it is not. Cruise then asks how he knows where the mess hall is. The answer is that it was common knowledge.

Mario Apuzzo, attorney in Kerchner v Obama, provides excellent research and background on what Natural Born Citizen means and how our founding fathers understood it.

http://puzo1.blogspot.com

A more recent document from the US Senate, one signed by Barack Obama, acknowledges the importance of having two US Citizen parents to be a Natural Born Citizen and eligible to be president.

“SRES 511 ATS

110th CONGRESS

2d Session

S. RES. 511

Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

April 10, 2008

Mrs. MCCASKILL (for herself, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. OBAMA, Mr. COBURN, Mrs. CLINTON, and Mr. WEBB) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary”

“Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen’ under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.”

Read more:

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=sr110-511

About these ads

67 responses to “Obama eligibility, Natural born citizen, Obama birth certificate and college records, Simple question

  1. International Citizens’ Day of Action to Move Money from the BIG Bank$

    http://www.stopbank.blogspot.com/

  2. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2634356/posts

    Obama has brought CHANGE: “The US Diplomatic Leaks”

    Spiegel Online International ^

    Posted on Monday, November 29, 2010 9:01:47 AM by MelSmith

    “Never before in history has a superpower lost control of such vast amounts of such sensitive information — data that can help paint a picture of the foundation upon which US foreign policy is built. Never before has the trust America’s partners have in the country been as badly shaken.”

  3. Where do we go to find out what Scotus decided?

  4. http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,731580,00.html

    A Political Meltdown

    Such surprises from the annals of US diplomacy will dominate the headlines in the coming days when the New York Times, London’s Guardian, Paris’ Le Monde, Madrid’s El Pais and SPIEGEL begin shedding light on the treasure trove of secret documents from the State Department. Included are 243,270 diplomatic cables filed by US embassies to the State Department and 8,017 directives that the State Department sent to its diplomatic outposts around the world. In the coming days, the participating media will show in a series of investigative stories how America seeks to steer the world. The development is no less than a political meltdown for American foreign policy.

  5. 10-446
    KERCHNER, CHARLES, ET AL. V. OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF U.S., ET AL.
    The motion of Western Center for Journalism for leave to
    file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a
    writ of certiorari is denied.

  6. http://www.scotusblog.com/
    This Week at the Court

    At 10:00 a.m. Eastern on Monday, the Court is expected to release orders from its November 23 Conference. (Our list of “Petitions to Watch” for that Conference is here.) We will be covering those orders on the blog.

  7. Zach Jones | November 29, 2010 at 10:14 am | 10-446

    KERCHNER, CHARLES, ET AL. V. OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF U.S., ET AL.
    The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

    ——————————————————-

    I tried to advise everyone that the Kerchner case would most likely be denied. No one should be surprised by the denial of Kerchner. At this point it is best to focus on the strong cases that will come before SCOTUS in the future.

  8. http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/112910zor.pdf

    Zach Jones | November 29, 2010 at 10:14 am | 10-446
    KERCHNER, CHARLES, ET AL. V. OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF U.S., ET AL.
    The motion of Western Center for Journalism for leave to
    file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a
    writ of certiorari is denied.

  9. So Scotus Declared, bring on the civil war, may they be the first to burn!!!

  10. Thanks Zack,

    I was just about to post my email alert stating the same.

    10-446 KERCHNER, CHARLES, ET AL. V. OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF U.S., ET AL.

    The motion of Western Center for Journalism for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

    10-560 SCHULZ, ROBERT L. V. FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, ET AL.
    The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice
    Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

  11. The Two Justices Appointed by Obama Did Not Recuse Themselves.
    http://tinyurl.com/22seslk

  12. Well, well, well. Now America, we know where we stand. America is now a fascist/socialist country under no rule of law as we knew it when once we had Supreme Court who believed and PROTECTED THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES. They make up the laws as they go along to suit what is momentarily expedient.

    As I have suspected the past few months when I began to realize the nine honorables were cowardly dishonorables, American citizens have no safe harbor. We are up a creek–screwed, blued and tatooed. The government’s protection of this criminal and all the other criminals complicit in this and the hundreds of crimes they have conspired to commit against America is total and complete. “Oh, sinner man, where ya gonna run to!”

    The entire Supreme Court, Congress, and government in general needs to be terminated and new replacements with honor found. It will probably never happen in my life time–but this is what needs to be done.

  13. FreeSpeech,

    Quick Question.

    How many Justices review cases for a Writ? All of them or only 3?

    I forget…

  14. Margie | November 29, 2010 at 10:41 am | So Scotus Declared, bring on the civil war, may they be the first to burn!!!

    —————————————————————-

    No Margie, they simply denied Kerchner without comment as expected. There is no need to be fatalistic. The Kerchner case was fatally flawed from the outset.

    The fact that they accepted the amicus from Western Journalism indicates that SCOTUS is gathering information to rule on the eligibility cases and I expect that they will rule against bo on the eligibility issue, boCare, immigration et al in 2011.

    http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/11/04/the-true-meaning-and-interpretation-of-article-ii-natural-born-citizen/

  15. FS – dude, your denial is thick. What is it about this “eligibility” game don’t you get?

    Think of this comment as a friendly baseball bat whacked upside that brilliant noggin of yours – SCOTUS takes their orders from the current diabolical leader of the New World Khazarian Order. NO ONE ELSE! And this leader in the states is wicked smart and brilliantly cunning, but unfortunately he has never, ever, ever been on the people’s side and he never will. Why? B/c he makes a ton of dough and laughs all the way to the bank at the sheeple.

    To understand what has happened to our federal government YOU MUST take your valuable resource, time, and do some historical research. Btw, it’s all at your fingertips.

    Sure you could go back to the Revolutionary War to learn WE LOST and that the Founding Father’s worked WITH King George to write up a peace treaty LONG BEFORE THE WAR SUPPOSEDLY ENDED!

    But I suggest starting with the official ACT of 1871. This is the official ACT that removed the constitutional form of government AND made it a MUNICIPAL CORPORATION.

    SCOTUS hasn’t worked for the people since then! I know you have a JD behind your name, but come on, use the wisdom God gave you by climbing out of the matrix and learning the TRUTH!!!

    Lead, FS, LEAD!!!

  16. SirWilliam | November 29, 2010 at 11:11 am | FreeSpeech,

    Quick Question.

    How many Justices review cases for a Writ? All of them or only 3?

    I forget…

    ———————————————————————–

    It is my understanding that Kerchner was submitted to all the Justices for consideration of the Writ. It only takes 4 to grant the Writ, so obviously there was not agreement by even the 4 most conservative Justices that the Kerchner case merited a hearing.

  17. FreeSpeech,

    Disregard my last question. Charles just emailed me and I understand now.

  18. FreeSpeech,

    Yes, 4 counting Kagen and Sotemayer. But had they done the ethical thing and rescued themselves, it would have only taken 3.

    Don’t know the vote count as we speak. We’ll see.

  19. helen | November 29, 2010 at 11:17 am |

    NONSENSE

    There is no need to be fatalistic. The Kerchner case was fatally flawed from the outset.

    The fact that they accepted the amicus from Western Journalism indicates that SCOTUS is gathering information to rule on the eligibility cases and I expect that they will rule against bo on the eligibility issue, boCare, immigration et al in 2011.

    http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/11/04/the-true-meaning-and-interpretation-of-article-ii-natural-born-citizen/

  20. NONSENSE””’—can you please explain this?

  21. Well well –

    Some self-righteous person once said the USSC would take the next case that came along – because most were staunch conservatives and that the court was really angry.

    And the person who was/is right all the time said – no way!

    I stand by my earlier statement. They KNEW that if they denied us, we would whine a little but nothing would happen. If they granted the cert, they KNEW that there would be massive and plentiful riots and thousands would die and millions might be injured, not to count the $Bs in economic havoc.

    So, what is the “responsible” thing to do?

    Simple logic trumps Wishful Thinking all the time!!

  22. terminu | November 29, 2010 at 11:40 am | NONSENSE””’—can you please explain this?

    ——————————————————–
    terminu,

    Read this and the cited essay at the end by Winter on Standing for a thorough explanation.

    http://standupamericaus.com/our-privilege-our-right-and-our-duty-civilian-grand-jury:33320

  23. Citizen Wells…what now? Please, more insight desperately wanted.

  24. F.S. Yes but how to insist upon that right? We see the reaction (jail, abuse, corruption, ignoring) thus far.
    We’re out here waiting for any insights.

  25. If the USA is a corporation, does right to citizen grand jury exist any more either?

  26. The surprise over the denial of the Kerchner case is the real surprise today. I predicted months ago that SCOTUS would not hear the case. There were just too many fatal flaws in the Kerchner case.

    Now that the Kerchner case is done, we Patriots need to focus on the other strong case against bo that are headed to SCOTUS.

  27. terminu,

    Read these essays and then we can intelligently discuss bo’s dismal future before SCOTUS. bo will lose before SCOTUS on boCare, immigration, eligibility et al.

    http://standupamericaus.com/our-privilege-our-right-and-our-duty-civilian-grand-jury:33320

  28. Carlyle | November 29, 2010 at 11:44 am |

    ..”If they granted the cert, they KNEW that there would be massive and plentiful riots and thousands would die and millions might be injured…”
    ************************************************

    That Sir, Is one Hell of a leap of Assumption….

    One could most certainly assume the alternative. Millions will die with this Narcissistic Fraud in America, and thousands will die in riots in the near future in this Country alone due to his Anti-American tactics and Foreign Policies.

    The same has been said with many past Politicians in our History being removed or forced to resign.

    And………the Anarchy was where?

  29. I agree.

    Now it may be time to focus on the hardcore, solid crimes and felonies he’s committed.

    Identity theft, elections fraud, etc.

  30. It is interesting that the obots are coming out of the woodwork again to spread gloom and doom over a rulling that was fully expected by almost all legal scholars.

    I am more encouraged about the prospects of legally removing bo than I have been in almost two years.

    bo and the obots want you to be hopeless. Don’t fall for bo’s con game again.

  31. TruthSeeker | November 29, 2010 at 12:15 pm | I agree.

    Now it may be time to focus on the hardcore, solid crimes and felonies he’s committed.

    Identity theft, elections fraud, etc.
    ———————————————————————
    Well Stated. Thank you.

  32. My pleasure FS,

    Glad we’re on the same page.

  33. Free Speech | November 29, 2010 at 12:01 pm | terminu,

    Read these essays and then we can intelligently discuss bo’s dismal future before SCOTUS. bo will lose before SCOTUS on boCare, immigration, eligibility et al.

    http://standupamericaus.com/our-privilege-our-right-and-our-duty-civilian-grand-jury:33320
    ________________________

    FS, you just lost all credibility with me. Gone! Poof!
    Stand Up for America is lead by a retired General who spent his entire military career learning and teaching MK Ultra techniques.

    Where were such techniques born? Why in Germany under the fascist dictator we all know as Hitler.

    How did these techniques of mind control EVEN come to our land – why the corporations ruse – OPERATION PAPERCLIP

    And where did Ann and Sr. meet? Why in a RUSSIAN LANGUAGE CLASS at the University of Hawaii which was part of MK Ultra’s curriculum.
    ____________________________

    terminu – Read the Act of 1871. The T-Room wrote a post on it back in March or April of this year. There are others that have taken action and gotten off these damned threads to dig and learn for ourselves rather than relying on others.

    Self education is the only avenue out of the matrix the dark souls have built to keep all of us in the dark.
    ______________
    And FS, titles mean nothing, it’s what is in the soul that matters. And the leader of that rather dark site you want to drive traffic to could never have a healed soul after taking part in all of the mind control experiments these so called military leaders took part in.

    Shame on you!

  34. terminu | November 29, 2010 at 11:50 am | F.S. Yes but how to insist upon that right?
    ———————————-
    Firstly, call you County Sheriff, DA, Grand Jury Foreman and Police Chief and demand that bo and his local co-conspirators in your County be prosecuted for their voter fraud, identity theft, sexual assaults etc.

    If that is not successful then form your own Grand Jury and announce the indictment to the Press, the State Legislators etc and file a lawsuit directly to SCOTUS upon Original Jurisdiction.

    But by all means do NOT attempt citizens arrests.

    http://standupamericaus.com/our-privilege-our-right-and-our-duty-civilian-grand-jury:33320

  35. helen,

    Shame on you for defaming Great American Patriots like Generals Vallely and McInerney, and Col Lakin.

  36. TruthSeeker | November 29, 2010 at 12:25 pm |

    My pleasure FS,

    Glad we’re on the same page.

    ————————————————————

    It is an honor to be in the company of Patriots like youself, TruthSeeker.

    And thanks also for all the good videos and links that you have posted.

  37. No you don’t, FS. You are not going to tag me for saying something I never said.

    I stand 100% behind Lt. Col Lakin and will keep doing so no matter the eventual outcome.

    Vallely is a master in MK Ultra. That’s his resume and all I’m doing is pointing out this FACT.

    You will not get away with putting words on this thread I never uttered.

  38. This case getting dismissed was expected but it still enrages me. There have been several other cases that were distributed for conference by SCOTUS that were dismissed due to lack of standing. There is no light at the end of the tunnel. SCOTUS is not waiting for a stronger case or anything like that. None of the cases were dismissed based on their merits, always lack of standing. “Lack of standing” = Cowards In Black Robes

  39. Evidently boCohorts have launched another denial of service attack on Free Republic.

  40. Posted in ‘comments':

    “cfkerchner said…

    Carlyle,

    The “Roberts Court” of the U.S. Supreme Court imo will be known in history as the Neville Chamberlain supreme court, the great Obama appeaser court.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neville_Chamberlain

    Appeasement due to fear that some immediate small amount of veiled and threatened violence from the far left Saul Alinsky goons and tyrants and bullies and thus not doing the right thing early only to support the rule of law and the Constitution ultimately leads to be much bigger problem later. History has shown us that over and over. This matter should have been addressed by the media and political parties early in the spring of 2008 during the primaries. It wasn’t. Congress should have addressed this when asked and when constitutionally it was required to. It didn’t. The courts should have addressed the merits of the questions when appealed to early on. They didn’t. Everyone in our system of government chose appeasement over confrontation and punted the ball to someone else. Now it is far worse. The Supreme Court has chosen appeasement and inaction over action and dealing with the issue and questions openly in a court of law under the rules of evidence and law. Our Constitutional Republic and legal system is now compromised and broken. And it will only get worse as our legal system and constitutional republic further deteriorates and the rule of law gives way to appeasement of bullies such as Obama and his far left cronies and puppet masters. Appeasement of the constitutional usurpers will not make it go away. It will only delay the inevitable and fester and in the end be a far worse situation to deal with when the real nature of the tyrant reveals himself in a bolder way and takes away all our liberties. Neville Chamberlain tactics never work with bullies, tyrants, and national socialists.

    CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)

    November 29, 2010 9:30 AM”

    https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7466841558189356289&postID=5326958144121265513

  41. “Open Letter to Congressman Rohrabacher”

    “ISN’T IT PAST TIME FOR YOU TO FIX THE PROBLEM YOU CREATED?”

    “To add to this betrayal of the American people, the 111th Congress not only permitted the subversion of the government to occur but all of the members of Congress also aided and abetted the domestic enemy, Mr. Obama, to proceed.

    When I visited your office regarding my concerns about this matter in the early part of 2009, you even had the unmitigated gall to give me your personal assurances that Mr. Obama’s eligibility issue was resolved to your satisfaction, that you were especially familiar with the issues and that it was of no consequence.”

    http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/11/29/open-letter-to-congressman-rohrabacher/

  42. To my fellow bloggers and CW,

    The SCOTUS has a duty to determine what is Constitutional, and to interpret the Constitution. They don’t have to find against Obama to make a ruling that is important precedence for the meaning of NBC for the office of POTUS. I do not believe that silence is adequate here, they need to take one of these cases and make a ruling as to the meaning of NBC. My belief before was that this has nothing to do with the Constitutional meaning of NBC, and this is just being reinforced as time goes on. This entire fiasco has to do with preventing discovery. Get discovery, and it all goes away, the truth will set us all free.
    Pete

  43. Freespeech, I call it garbage, and await the time till I can dance on their graves. Death for all Traitors!!

  44. Matt at 12:44 pm
    This case getting dismissed was expected but it still enrages me. There have been several other cases that were distributed for conference by SCOTUS that were dismissed due to lack of standing. There is no light at the end of the tunnel. SCOTUS is not waiting for a stronger case or anything like that. None of the cases were dismissed based on their merits, always lack of standing.

    ————————
    As I recall SCOTUS has offered no explanation for not taking any of the cases that made it to them…essentially they are evading the issue entirely. The lower courts were the ones citing lack of standing, lack of jurisdiction, etc. to dismiss.

  45. Thanks FS,

    Same here.

  46. helen,

    Thank you for admitting that you have defamed the Great American Patriots Generals Vallely and McInerney.

    If you defame those most honorable Military Officers, then you defame Col Lakin, because Generals Vallely and McInerney are among Col Lakin’s greatest supporters.

    I do not know General McInerney but I do know General Vallely and he is one of the most admirable men that I have known. Your defamation of these men is DISGRACEFUL.

    http://standupamericaus.com/our-privilege-our-right-and-our-duty-civilian-grand-jury:33320

  47. Everyone is upset, including me.

    Imploding is not the answer.

  48. Free Speech | November 29, 2010 at 1:02 pm | helen,

    Thank you for admitting that you have defamed the Great American Patriots Generals Vallely and McInerney.

    If you defame those most honorable Military Officers, then you defame Col Lakin, because Generals Vallely and McInerney are among Col Lakin’s greatest supporters.

    I do not know General McInerney but I do know General Vallely and he is one of the most admirable men that I have known. Your defamation of these men is DISGRACEFUL.
    _________________________
    FS – no one, especially myself has defamed anyone. Read the post again, smart guy and don’t waste my time by putting words on paper YOU said not me.

    And don’t generalize my comment by making it sound as though I’m tagging anyone other than Vallely. I’m not.

    According to your twisted logic, because I do not wish to place any faith in a master of mind control, aka MK Ultra, does not then cast such a shadow on anyone else.

    Use your lame courtroom tactics on someone else. They aren’t going to work on me.

    Most everyone seems to know the rule of law was replaced with military Rules of Procedure long ago. Being educated in the art of law would have taught you that, but I can only assume you missed that day in class.

    But it appears you attended the instructional classes of putting words in ones mouth they never spoke or wrote. I’m sure you got an A. Good for you, but don’t bother using it on me. You are wasting your precious time.

  49. Commander Kerchner has provided a CNN story link to the SCOTUS decision on Mr. Apuzzo’s blog:

    http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/11/29/scotus.birther.appeal

  50. http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/tobyharnden/100065782/julian-assange-is-teasing-barack-obama-over-drip-drip-wikileaks-releases/

    In the same cable, the Saudi king certainly knew how to push the right buttons with the Obama administration:

    Brennan said President Obama looked forward to seeing the King at the G-20 summit in London. “Thank God for bringing Obama to the presidency,” the King answered, which has created “great hope” in the Muslim world. “May God grant him strength and patience, Abdullah continued, “May God protect him. I’m concerned about his personal safety. America and the world need such a president.”

    Clearly delighted with such a golden opportunity to suck up to the big boss, the diplomat who drafted the cable headed this section: “THE WORLD NEEDS OBAMA” (though how this went down with the Secretary of State alas remains unrecorded).

  51. http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/tobyharnden/100065782/julian-assange-is-teasing-barack-obama-over-drip-drip-wikileaks-releases/

    It seems to me that Assange is teasing Obama. Whereas the Afghanistan and Iraq war logs could be largely dismissed as Bush era material that didn’t really reflect on Obama, the State Department cables are different.

    They go up to 28 February 2010, offering a potential window on Obama’s foreign policy which may well not show it in the sainted light he would prefer. It seems to me that Assange is teasing Obama, letting him know what WikiLeaks has and making him sweat.

    Today was round one and the action was pretty tame. But there are plenty more rounds to come and Obama is on the back foot.

  52. Change of subject for a moment….

    Do you all remember the consistent made argument made by Obama, Clinton and the Liberal Democrats, whereby there is No Such Thing as a War on “Terrorism” and “Terrorism” is only a tactic. And do you also remember when those same Democrats also stated that there are ZERO weapons of mass Destruction, and do you remember when the same Democrats stated that we Are Not at war with “Islam’?

    Funny thing…. If none of that is true, then why is this information from Hillary Clinton and the SOS office states the following….(in part)

    S E C R E T STATE 037566

    NOFORN

    E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/16/2034
    TAGS: PINR KSPR ECON CD CV GA ML MR NG SG UV
    SUBJECT: (S) REPORTING AND COLLECTION NEEDS: WEST AFRICA
    SAHEL REGION

    REF: A. 08 STATE 124337
    ¶B. 04 STATE 179667

    Classified By: CATHERINE BROWN, DAS IPC. REASON: 1.4(C).

    . Security
    1) International Terrorism (TERR)
    2) Response To Terrorism (TERR)

    1) International Terrorism (TERR).
    — Details, presence, and activities related to al-Qa’ida in
    the land of the “Islamic” Maghreb and other terrorist-related
    individuals and organizations.
    — Plans and intentions for operations against U.S. or
    allied personnel or interests.
    — Links to “weapons of mass destruction” or related
    materials.
    — Plans to deploy biometric systems to enhance domestic
    counterterrorism efforts.

    NIPF Priority for Non-State Actors for TERR
    Al-Qa’ida and Sunni Affiliates: 1, Hizballah (Lebanese): 1,
    Jama’at Tablighi: 3

    And by the way, “Profiling” is immoral and illegal according to the Democrats, or is it? Hillary issued this..

    — Health, biographic, biometric, and assessment information
    on leaders.

    — Public opinion about U.S. actions in Africa, particularly
    regarding the U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) and the
    Millennium Challenge Corporation foreign aid program.
    — Response to U.S. policies regarding the Sahel region, the
    Middle East, Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, and the global war on
    terror.
    — Impact of trade relations with India and Brazil on
    relations with the United States.

    — Cooperation with terrorist or insurgent groups.

    – Vaccination practices, capabilities, and response related
    to drug-resistant

    — Macroeconomic statistics regarding trade, budget, balance
    of payments, and national economies, including reliability or
    manipulation of data.
    — Public perception of economic conditions, including youth
    employment prospects.
    — Nature and extent of underground banking systems.
    — Details on economic assistance needs and partnerships,
    and effectiveness of aid.
    — Financial data transmission systems and accounting
    methods.

    and much, much more…

    Crunch on that for awhile…

    just saying

  53. 1:44 pm ——–

    “In the same cable, the Saudi king certainly knew how to push the right buttons with the Obama administration:

    Brennan said President Obama looked forward to seeing the King at the G-20 summit in London. “Thank God for bringing Obama to the presidency,” the King answered, which has created “great hope” in the Muslim world.”
    ==============
    ==============
    Posted: July 21, 2009

    “Did radical Muslims help send Obama to Harvard?
    White House refuses to release president’s law school records”

    “In an appearance on the New York-produced “Inside City Hall” television show, octogenarian Harlem lawyer Percy Sutton – whose clients included Malcolm X – explained that Islamic radical Khalid Abdullah Tariq al-Mansour, “one of the world’s wealthiest men,” asked him to write a letter of recommendation to Harvard Law School for then relatively unknown Barack Obama.

    In the video, Sutton says he was introduced to Obama by al-Mansour, a Saudi citizen, who “was then raising money” for Obama.”

    http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=104684

  54. http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/11/29/scotus.birther.appeal/

    The Obama administration did not file, and the high court did not demand, a formal government response to this latest legal claim. The high court will often insist the Justice Department weigh in with its views on a particular constitutional issue, or when it is being sued, and that is a sign the justices are seriously considering accepting the appeal.

    Among the issues the high court has refused to fully address in these appeals involves “standing,” whether individual Americans can bring such a lawsuit, by first establishing personal, direct “harm” or “injury” from having Obama occupy the White House. Overcoming that legal hurdle would allow such suits to proceed on the merits in courts.

  55. 2:02 pm ——-

    Need this paragraph for clarification:

    “Sutton described al-Mansour as being from Texas, saying al-Mansour was the “principal adviser to one of the world’s richest men,” most likely Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal.”

  56. FreeSpeech,

    I agree with the “Standing” barriers. However, I personally believe that the creation of “Standing” alone was unconstitutional. I would say it needs to be repealed, but then again, it was never legally adopted. How does one go about repealing a law, that was never a law to begin with?

    catch-22

  57. Furthermore,

    How does one define “Standing” if it is a moving target dependent upon the viewers political paradigm as a Chief Justice?

    EPA has “Standing” in a 5-4 ruling, as the Carbon emissions “Affects All of mankind throughout the world on every Continent”……

    Kerchner has No Standing, as Obama fraud “Affects All Citizens in the U.S.” therefore injury is not unique and specific to an individual…?

    Hmmmm… Interesting isn’t it..

  58. OT, but finally got an answer from my colleague regarding the airport scanners. He said that the Health Physics Society is THE expert in this area, and he sent me the following links:

    http://hps.org/publicinformation/ate/faqs/backscatterfaq.html

    For pregnant women:

    http://hps.org/publicinformation/ate/q9417.html

    Strangely enough, this group doesn’t seem to be overly concerned about the scanners. Make your own determination!

  59. SueK,

    Thanks (again…lol) for staying on top of the Health issues.

    I guess (and guessing it is), that maybe they are basing their statistical findings upon an “average” or even less than that, ie.. outliers, such as most fliers are not frequent going through the scanners. Like a 1 time or 10 time flying in a lifetime.

    In that case, it would not be harmful I would agree.

    But what about separating the classifications into “Categories” for subject matter? In other words, those Frequent fliers on Business trips that spend 50-75% away on travel per month, every month?

    Certainly at some point, the delta line of deviations must cross the health realm of “Safe” to “Unsafe”, dependent upon the direct correlation of number of times exposed per month, multiplied by the years expected.

    Just a thought.

  60. SirWilliam | November 29, 2010 at 2:17 pm |

    I agree the concept of Standing limits ones right to redress pursuant to Bill of Rights. In the Kerchner case, however, there were no actual present damages at the time of filing and a political issue argument was raised by suing the entire congress.

    It was asking for too much to ask SCOTUS to set a precedent allowing a plaintiff without present actual damages to sue former VP Cheney and the entire US congress.

    If SCOTUS had taken the case and ruled for the plaintiff, it would have set a precedent allowing even a plaintiff without actual present damages to sue the entire congress regarding any acts perceived to cause future damages.

    If SCOTUS had taken the case and ruled for the defendant, then whether stated or not it would have been construed by bo as a ruling abrogating the Qualification Clause of Article II Section 1 of the Constitution.

    Thus, the Kerchner case was a no-win situation for SCOTUS and the Rule of Law.

  61. OK, so we are all upset, I understand. In a day(s), week, month, we will still come together as patriots and work ourselves through this, I truly believe that, in myself and in you.

    I have an Obama Joke for you. An Ice Breaker hopefully.. here it is…

    …One day in the future, Barack Obama has a heart
    attack and dies.

    He immediately goes to Hell, where the devil is
    waiting for him.

    “I don’t know what to do here,” says the devil. “You
    are on my list, but I have no room for you. You definitely have to
    stay here, so I’ll tell you what I’m going to do. I’ve got a couple of
    folks here who weren’t quite as bad as you. I’ll let one of them go,
    but you have to take their place. I’ll even let YOU decide who
    leaves.”

    Obama thought that sounded pretty good, so the devil
    opened the door to the first room.

    In it was Ted Kennedy and a large pool of water. Ted
    kept diving in, and surfacing, empty handed. Over, and over, and over
    he dived in and surfaced with nothing. Such was his fate in hell.

    “No,” Obama said. “I don’t think so. I’m not a good
    swimmer, and I don’t think I could do that all day long.”

    The devil led him to the door of the next room.

    In it was Al Gore with a sledgehammer and a room
    full of rocks. All he did was swing that hammer, time after time after
    time.

    “No, this is no good; I’ve got this problem with my
    shoulder. I would be in constant agony if all I could do was break
    rocks all day,” commented Obama.

    The devil opened a third door. Through it, Obama saw
    Bill Clinton, lying on the bed, his arms tied over his head, and his
    legs restrained in a spread-eagle pose. Bent over him was Monica
    Lewinsky, doing what she does best.

    Obama looked at this in shocked disbelief, and
    finally said, “Yeah man, I can handle this.”

    The devil smiled and said .. . . . .

    (This is priceless…)

    “OK, Monica, you’re free to go.”

  62. NO ONE can touch the FRAUD…..he is prez of the US Corporation and he does not have to be a Natural Born Citizen to hold that position!! Until we prove our present form of government is unlawful then “we the people” do not have a chance……listen to Rod Class on talkshoe and then you all might understand what we are up against!

    http://recordings.talkshoe.com/rss48361.xml

  63. Author on Fox News: Obama’s Grandmother Said Barack was born in Mombasa, Kenya

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s