Purpura et al. v. Sebelius et al, Standing v US Constitution, First amendment rights, Legalese cited to perpetuate legalese

Purpura et al. v. Sebelius et al, Standing v US Constitution, First amendment rights, Legalese cited to perpetuate legalese

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”…First Amendment US Constitution

From  Birther Report January 17, 2011.

“Government files their motion to dismiss in Purpura et al. v. Sebelius et al.. The lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey by Nicholas Purpura and Donald Laster of the Jersey Shore Tea Party Patriots and the New Jersey Tea Party Coalition. Other plaintiffs in the lawsuit include the Colts Neck Tea Party, Jersey Shore Tea Party Patriots, Jackson Tea Party Patriots, Bayshore Tea Party Group and Ocean County Citizens for Freedom. The lawsuit alleges the healthcare bill is unconstitutional on 15 separate counts including Obama’s ineligibility. Full brief embedded below. More background on the case can be found here. The lead plaintiffs discuss their lawsuit here, the video is also embedded at bottom of this post.

The government argues the plaintiffs lack standing and the court does not have jurisdiction…”

Read more:

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/01/government-files-motion-to-dismiss-in.html

Notice from the Table of Authorities:

“Kerchner v. Obama,
612 F.3d 204 (3d Cir. 2010)”
“Lightfoot v. United States,
564 F.3d 625 (3d Cir. 2009)”

They are attempting to use legalese, “standing”, applied in earlier cases to substantiate further legalese and thus attempt to trump the First Amendment and effectively block attempts to redress government for grievances by petition.

About these ads

120 responses to “Purpura et al. v. Sebelius et al, Standing v US Constitution, First amendment rights, Legalese cited to perpetuate legalese

  1. Contact your congressman, senators, County Sheriff, DA, State Legislators, Governor, and County Grand Jury Foreman and demand that they indict and prosecute BO and all his local co-conspirators for the Murders and False Imprisonment of Opponents of the BO regime, Birth Document Forgeries, TSA Sexual Assaults & Illegal Searches, Election Fraud, Voter Fraud, Identity Theft, Illegal Foreign Campaign Contributions, Aiding and Abetting of Muslim Terrorists, Poisoning of the Gulf of Mexico, Theft of Private Property, Embezzlement of Government funds, WikiLeaks etc.

    http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/06/how-to-start-and-lead-citizens-grand.html

    http://dewdropwarriors.blogspot.com/2009_05_01_archive.html

  2. Political Leaders Seeing Rise In Flathead Valley Third Parties
    http://www.nbcmontana.com/news/26513712/detail.html

  3. Kenya: Sweet Home Obama
    Expectations weigh heavy on Kenya’s native sons
    http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/election2008/2008/10/kenya-sweet-home-obama.html

  4. OT – I think we are about to learn who the PTBs are and their Elitist life-style.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jan/17/julian-assange-tax-wikileaks-swiss

    This could be a Barn Burner. Do you notice how our MSM don’t cover these kind of stories?

  5. Notice from the Table of Authorities:

    “Kerchner v. Obama,
    612 F.3d 204 (3d Cir. 2010)”
    “Lightfoot v. United States,
    564 F.3d 625 (3d Cir. 2009)”

    They are attempting to use legalese, “standing”, applied in earlier cases to substantiate further legalese and thus attempt to trump the First Amendment and effectively block attempts to redress government for grievances by petition.
    ————————————————————————————–
    It was easily foreseeable that this would happen after these unsuccessfully litigated cases. I advised Mario and Orly 2 years ago that they needed to file motions for Original Jurisdiction before SCOTUS and I drafted a Original Jurisdiction Motion for Orly, but she went off on a Quo Warranto tangent to try and force Holder to prosecute her case against BO and never filed the Original Jurisdiction Motion. So plaintiffs against BO are now facing two bad precedents by lower courts.

    I hope other eligibility lawyers learn from these mistakes and file for Original Jurisdiction before SCOTUS. Of course, SCOTUS can not hear all these cases brought before it, but it only takes one to legally remove BO.

    http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/07/taking-aka-obama-directly-before-scotus.html

  6. GBAmerica | January 18, 2011 at 9:29 am |
    Baldwin: ‘There’s a Fight Coming’
    http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/articles/article/baldwin_theres_a_fight_coming/21438/

  7. Now the Limousine Liberals are ridiculing Big Bro & Big Sis.

  8. I found this buried in the story about Obama partying after the Tuscon speech. “UNLESS”, White House scared?

    Question: How do you feel about the attacks against Sarah Palin following the Tucson shooting?

    Insider: Palin? I don’t really care one way or the other. I read your defense of her. Not bad, but frankly, Palin is no longer the threat she was to the party not so long ago. I have heard first hand there is no way she gets the nomination. As in NO WAY. Understand? I still find her appeal a fascinating thing to watch unfold, but she will not be a factor beyond some version of a conservative political cheer leader IMO. Unless, and I will throw you a bit of a bone here, UNLESS something comes out on the birther stuff. Yeah, I’m bringing it up myself here. Something is out there but nobody wants to touch it. The topic is coming up amongst us more than it ever has. I’m talking people who mocked it, dismissed it before, who are now quietly saying something is stirring out there on this subject and it’s got the WH very concerned. Big time worried. There are discussion in the WH about the issue. And I think some of the Republican leadership has a whiff of it but all indications appear to be they want nothing to do with it. It’s being buried deep. For now.

    Read more: http://newsflavor.com/politics/world-politics/white-house-insider-obama-celebrates-shortly-after-delivering-tucson-memorial-speech/#ixzz1BOlW8YbN

  9. Free Speech | January 18, 2011 at 9:52 am |

    Notice from the Table of Authorities:

    “Kerchner v. Obama,
    612 F.3d 204 (3d Cir. 2010)”
    “Lightfoot v. United States,
    564 F.3d 625 (3d Cir. 2009)”

    They are attempting to use legalese, “standing”, applied in earlier cases to substantiate further legalese and thus attempt to trump the First Amendment and effectively block attempts to redress government for grievances by petition.
    ————————————————————————————–
    It was easily foreseeable that this would happen after these unsuccessfully litigated cases. I advised Mario and Orly 2 years ago that they needed to file motions for Original Jurisdiction before SCOTUS and I drafted a Original Jurisdiction Motion for Orly, but she went off on a Quo Warranto tangent to try and force Holder to prosecute her case against BO and never filed the Original Jurisdiction Motion. So plaintiffs against BO are now facing two bad precedents by lower court
    ****************************
    FS, Orly said she tried to file with the SCOTUS but the clerk would not accept it, and refused several times.

  10. 10-678
    HOLLISTER, GREGORY S. V. SOETORO, BARRY, ET AL.

    Denied

    http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/011811zor.pdf

  11. bob strauss | January 18, 2011 at 10:35 am |
    Free Speech | January 18, 2011 at 9:52 am |

    Notice from the Table of Authorities:

    “Kerchner v. Obama,
    612 F.3d 204 (3d Cir. 2010)”
    “Lightfoot v. United States,
    564 F.3d 625 (3d Cir. 2009)”

    They are attempting to use legalese, “standing”, applied in earlier cases to substantiate further legalese and thus attempt to trump the First Amendment and effectively block attempts to redress government for grievances by petition.
    ————————————————————————————–
    It was easily foreseeable that this would happen after these unsuccessfully litigated cases. I advised Mario and Orly 2 years ago that they needed to file motions for Original Jurisdiction before SCOTUS and I drafted a Original Jurisdiction Motion for Orly, but she went off on a Quo Warranto tangent to try and force Holder to prosecute her case against BO and never filed the Original Jurisdiction Motion. So plaintiffs against BO are now facing two bad precedents by lower court

    It was easily foreseeable that this would happen after these unsuccessfully litigated cases. I advised Mario and Orly 2 years ago that they needed to file motions for Original Jurisdiction before SCOTUS and I drafted a Original Jurisdiction Motion for Orly, but she went off on a Quo Warranto tangent to try and force Holder to prosecute her case against BO and never filed the Original Jurisdiction Motion. So plaintiffs against BO are now facing two bad precedents by lower courts.

    I hope other eligibility lawyers learn from these mistakes and file for Original Jurisdiction before SCOTUS. Of course, SCOTUS can not hear all these cases brought before it, but it only takes one to legally remove BO.

    http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/07/taking-aka-obama-directly-before-scotus.html

    ****************************
    FS, Orly said she tried to file with the SCOTUS but the clerk would not accept it, and refused several times.

    ————————————————————–
    So,bob strauss, are you saying that Orly did not know how to properly file her lawsuits?

    Whatever the case may be, I hope other eligibility lawyers learn from these mistakes and file for Original Jurisdiction before SCOTUS. Of course, SCOTUS can not hear all these cases brought before it, but it only takes one to legally remove BO.

    http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/07/taking-aka-obama-directly-before-scotus.html

  12. OT, but very important:
    Newsmax has a website to contact for those WANTING to sign for repeal of Obamacare. Vote could be coming up tomorrow. The petition will be submitted to congressmen. Check it out if you are interested. No charge.

    to http://www.joinourpetition.com

  13. Free Speech | January 18, 2011 at 8:13 am |

    Pixel Patriot | January 18, 2011

    Is “pixel patriot” an AKA for Carl Swensson?

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    I can assure you, the username Pixel Patriot is not Carl Swensson. I personally know “Pixel Patriot” and he is not whom you claim or guess he is.

    Free Speech | January 18, 2011 at 11:09 am |

    ……….I advised Mario… 2 years ago that they needed to file motions for Original Jurisdiction before SCOTUS…

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Advised in how? Sent them an email? This is easily verified. While it might, (and I say that lightly) be true you sent an email, that is not the same as your misleading statement, whereby legal involvement pursued as advice . But again, anyone can send an email “Advising” an attorney with an active case, a suggestion. Doesn’t make them special.

  14. FYI: Colonel Gregory Hollister v. Barry Soetoro (Obama), Petition for Writ of Certiorari Filed in the U.S. Supreme Court Denied Without Comment.

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/01/colonel-gregory-hollister-v-barry.html

  15. Cabby – AZ | January 18, 2011 at 11:28 am |

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Thanks. And by the way, how are you doing big guy? My apologies for not being able to have time to discuss critical topics on this blog with you, as you are a definite informed American Citizen. I dearly miss our conversations.

    In addition, and I do not have it in front of me, but can be googled I’m sure, is a case against ObamaCare in the State of Tennessee, and will “Add” persons (I think only in the State, not sure) to the case as Plaintiffs.

    I will sign the petition you linked.

  16. SirWilliam | January 18, 2011

    Notice from the Table of Authorities:

    “Kerchner v. Obama,
    612 F.3d 204 (3d Cir. 2010)”
    “Lightfoot v. United States,
    564 F.3d 625 (3d Cir. 2009)”

    They are attempting to use legalese, “standing”, applied in earlier cases to substantiate further legalese and thus attempt to trump the First Amendment and effectively block attempts to redress government for grievances by petition.
    ————————————————————————————–
    It was easily foreseeable that this would happen after these unsuccessfully litigated cases. I advised Mario and Orly 2 years ago that they needed to file upon Original Jurisdiction directly before SCOTUS and I drafted a Original Jurisdiction Brief for Orly.

    Mario responded but he was only interested in discussing what Orly said about him. I advised Mario that both Orly and I thought it was not advisable for him to sue Vice President Dick Cheney and the entire Congress because SCOTUS would never agree to hear a case that was based on clearly a political issue.

    I hope other eligibility lawyers learn from these mistakes and file for Original Jurisdiction before SCOTUS. Of course, SCOTUS can not hear all these cases brought before it, but it only takes one to legally remove BO.

    http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/07/taking-aka-obama-directly-before-scotus.html

  17. Someone suggested below that CW and P&E should be widely recommended as great sources of information.

    I write this note to say in the strongest possible terms that I cannot and will not do that. I may send selected bits to selected individuals, but I know that reading this blog in it’s entirety everyday is a net negative for our cause and not a net positive.

    As long as this blog is dominated by unworkable and impractical schemes, as long as this blog sees repeated and repeated cross postings from other thoroughly discredited sites/blogs, and as long as this blog is swarming with biased and unfounded accusations and conclusions – I cannot recommend it to anyone.

    A compelling example of the Prime Irritant right now is many bogus and insane statements made about the recent Arizona Tragedy.

    There are MANY questions. There are many LEGITIMATE questions. But there is insufficient data for conclusions of almost any type. Let’s stick to the questions and cut out the sermonizing and premature accusations.

    Mostly I think this blog – overall – due to a very few but frequent and vocal posters – sounds exactly like the wackos who suffered/suffer from Bush Derangement Syndrome. Blaming EVERYTHING, down to the most ridiculous minutiae on GWB. Here we see not BDS, but ODS.

    If this blog could stay focused on questions and rational research it would be great. As long as it wanders off into ODS land, it is not only not great, but proactively offputing.

    Continuing to hope and pray for sanity and civility! Let’s be an example to the enemy, not just mirroring them in reverse.

  18. SirWilliam | January 18, 2011

    Furthermore, I hope that other eligibility lawyers learn from Mario’s Mistake of guaranteeing dismissal of his case on political issue grounds by suing Vice President Dick Cheney and the entire Congress. No way that SCOTUS will ever hear a case like Mario’s that was clearly contrary to the ruling regarding political issue cases in Marbury v. Madison 5 U.S. (1 Crunch) 137, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803).

  19. Since comments here suggest that those many questions re: Obama’s past are not going away and that more doubters are becoming more and more interested (and that the WH itself is getting fearful) can anyone with “connections” with the various daily interview programs get them to bring back the man (Tom Fife) with the knowledge of this planned grooming of this Communist personality for President? Mr. Fife has stated that he’s been willing to go on various media with this info but most didn’t wish to touch it. Isn’t now as good a time (even ripe) to bring this to public attention?:

    http://www.cherada.com/articulos/tom-fife-the-first-time-i-heard-of-barack-essay-audio-interview

  20. Governor Abercrumby – Please call your office NOW.

  21. Carlyle | January 18, 2011

    Someone suggested below that CW and P&E should be widely recommended as great sources of information.

    … I know that reading this blog in it’s entirety everyday is a net negative for our cause and not a net positive.

    – I cannot recommend it to anyone.

    ———————————————————————

    If you have such a bad opinion of CW, then why don’t you just stay away and stop bothering us with your idiotic posts, carlyle.

    BO Follower threatens Conservative

    BO Follower Shabazz incites BO Followers to “Kill their babies.”

    Violent Plots of BO Mentor Bill Ayers

    BO Union Thugs assault Black Conservative

  22. Observer | January 18, 2011 at 12:27 pm | Since comments here suggest that those many questions re: Obama’s past are not going away and that more doubters are becoming more and more interested (and that the WH itself is getting fearful) can anyone with “connections” with the various daily interview programs get them to bring back the man (Tom Fife) with the knowledge of this planned grooming of this Communist personality for President? Mr. Fife has stated that he’s been willing to go on various media with this info but most didn’t wish to touch it. Isn’t now as good a time (even ripe) to bring this to public attention?:

    http://www.cherada.com/articulos/tom-fife-the-first-time-i-heard-of-barack-essay-audio-interview

    —————————————————
    Thanks, Observer.

    BO may not have been a KGB agent but he was clearly used as a Marxist Tool.

  23. Today’s earlier post on this blog about the letter sent in GA eloquently (albeit I am certain, inadvertently) expresses the reason protests against Obama’s Constitutional ineligibility to be POTUS fail to gain legal traction: citizen ignorance about the electoral process, including their own laws.

    GA already has a law linking candidate qualification for office, with eligibility to get on the ballot. (I wrote about this on my blog way back in the fall of 2008!) GA already has a law spelling out that citizens can launch protests with the SoS for suspected problems with candidate eligibility. GA already has citizen complaints of election fraud viz a viz the ballot, drafted and posted on my blog, which a handful of citizens have already sent to AG Baker, who preceded AG Olens. (And AG Baker was the only AG in the 13 vote binding states who, when I warned him Obama representatives were coercing Clinton pledged delegates to change their votes before the D Convention, warned Clinton delegates, in GA, the law says, they have to vote for the candidate voters elected them to represent! http://jbjd.org/2010/08/17/a-coup-through-and-through-2-of-3/)

    Then, not surprisingly, among other mistakes of fact the writer includes in his letter to officials, is this gem of a lie:

    “Third, the certification that was provided to the State of Georgia was done so by Nancy Pelosi and the Democratic National Committee. That Certification was not done in accordance with the requirements of the Constitution of the United States of America. A properly worded Certification was submitted to the State of Hawaii. However, the other 49 states received a different letter of Certification. It is requested that this certification be examined to determine if there was voter fraud perpetrated in its submission. Also, if the Certification was attested to under penalty of perjury and it is determined that the person placed on the ballot does not qualify under Article II of the Constitution as a Natural Born Citizen, then charges of perjury be made for those who made the attestation.”

    This lie that HI produced a unique Certification has haunted the blogosphere ever since JB Williams stole materials from my blog back in September 2009, BEFORE I obtained the Certification documents from SC and updated the article he had already stolen so that my readers would know, the laws of both HI and SC required specific language of eligibility on their Certifications, to get the name of the candidate printed on the ballot. Too bad the writer, evidently unaware he gets his information wrong, didn’t know about SC. He could have pointed out to GA that in neighboring SC, similar words of authentication were used on the ballot application, hand written at the last minute by the D state party Treasurer. http://jbjd.org/2009/10/10/if-it-looks-like-a-duck/

  24. Observer | January 18, 2011 at 12:50 pm | Knowledge everyone here has by now, but conveniently placed together in one spot:
    http://www.morningliberty.com/2010/06/05/barry-soetoro-interloper-in-the-white-house-20-clips-evidence-obama-cant-hide-from/

    ———————————————————–
    Great Site Observer!

  25. SirWilliam | January 18, 2011
    to
    Cabby – AZ | January 18, 2011 at 11:28 am |

    “Thanks. And by the way, how are you doing big guy? My apologies for not being able to have time to discuss critical topics on this blog with you, as you are a definite informed American Citizen. I dearly miss our conversations. ”

    ———————————————————————–
    So little sir william from your reference to your cohort cabby as a “big guy” it appears he (cabby) was LYING about his sex when he (cabby) said he (cabby) was a 77 year old woman?

    Or was he (cabby) merely confused about his gender as is BO and BO’s cohort the Arizona Killer Loughner?

  26. Here is THE best interview with Tom Fife I’ve ever heard (or seen) with lots more details and implying that he was working on getting the other American with him to maybe get involved followed by another great interview with Anne Leary mentioning her running into Bill Ayers and his outright statement that he wrote “Dreams…” – that he was asked to by Michelle. And he said this 3 times … that he wrote it!
    http://www.jrnyquist.com/media/FifeLeary_Int-1.mp3

    Wonder if World Net Daily or Liddy could get a more up to date discussion with Fife – where are the notes he gave in his security clearance briefings after this incident? Also mentions how he emphasized this info to his son back then.

  27. PLEASE WATCH THE ENTIRE VIDEO TO THE END!

    “ALAN KEYES SAYS OBAMA AND HEALTH CARE A MOVE TOWARDS DICTATORSHIP”

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

  28. The ARREST of BO Jr. Cohort Baby Doc and the Legal Removal of BO Jr. Cohort Zelaya must make BO Jr. very nervous. Unlike Baby Doc and Zelaya, BO Jr. will NOT escape Justice for Decades before BO Jr. gets ARRESTED.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE70H4BJ20110118?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews

  29. The Globe Mag is right on Obama’s ass lol

    Stressed-out Barack Obama has lost a whopping 30 pounds amid fears that shocking new investigations into his REAL birthplace will bring down his presidency, say sources. Find out who is turning up the heat in a bombshell world exclusive. It’s must reading for ALL Americans. Only in GLOBE!

    http://www.globemagazine.com/story/608

  30. “JEFF KUHNER ON OBAMA’S ELIGIBILITY: MEDIA PRIVATELY ADMIT SERIOUS CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS – 1/6/11″

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    DR. ALAN KEYES – “OBAMA IS A RADICAL COMMUNIST – WILL DESTROY AMERICA!”

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

  31. Observer | January 18, 2011 at 1:51 pm |
    Here is THE best interview with Tom Fife I’ve ever heard (or seen) with lots more details and implying that he was working on getting the other American with him to maybe get involved followed by another great interview with Anne Leary mentioning her running into Bill Ayers and his outright statement that he wrote “Dreams…” – that he was asked to by Michelle. And he said this 3 times … that he wrote it!
    http://www.jrnyquist.com/media/FifeLeary_Int-1.mp3

    Wonder if World Net Daily or Liddy could get a more up to date discussion with Fife – where are the notes he gave in his security clearance briefings after this incident? Also mentions how he emphasized this info to his son back then.

    —————————————————————
    Thanks Observer!

  32. Mr Clean | January 18, 2011 at 3:14 pm |
    The Globe Mag is right on Obama’s ass lol

    Stressed-out Barack Obama has lost a whopping 30 pounds amid fears that shocking new investigations into his REAL birthplace will bring down his presidency, say sources. Find out who is turning up the heat in a bombshell world exclusive. It’s must reading for ALL Americans. Only in GLOBE!

    http://www.globemagazine.com/story/608

    ——————————————————–
    Thanks Mr. Clean!

  33. Pro-life activist to primary Obama so he can air graphic pro-life ads during Super Bowl

    http://dailycaller.com/2011/01/18/pro-life-activist-to-primary-obama-so-he-can-air-graphic-pro-life-ads-during-super-bowl/

    He should include the letters from Michelle during O’s IL senate run to solicit funds with the promise to promote partial birth abortions … and his willingness to allow a baby who has survived an abortion to die in a soiled utility room – and that in a hospital with the name “Christ” and with Rev. Wright on its board!
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    And this …

    A More Coerced Union…..
    Critics claim Obama administration to ‘shame’ companies into unionizing

    http://dailycaller.com/2011/01/18/obama%e2%80%99s-department-of-labor-encourages-forces-unionization/

    along with his greater and greater regulations on just about everything is inviting Americans (who are becoming more disgruntled due to him) to spy on other Americans and report …. remind you of any other setups in other countries?

  34. Observer | January 18, 2011 at 1:51 pm |

    http://www.jrnyquist.com/media/FifeLeary_Int-1.mp3

    Observer – Do you think these are some of the people he was referring to?

    ms.helga | January 18, 2011 at 9:46 am |

    OT – I think we are about to learn who the PTBs are and their Elitist life-style.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jan/17/julian-assange-tax-wikileaks-swiss

  35. Free Speech | January 18, 2011 at 12:26 pm |

    ++++++++++++++++

    Wonderful and excellent advice. Your personal next case before the District, Appellate and the United Supreme Court is ….when?

    This is what I do not understand. If an Attorney, claims to know every way and means to file a suit, within the State as well as Federal, and how to exactly win the case to expose Obama, then why in the hell are you “Telling” me about it, rather than simply “Filing” the suit yourself ???

    Honestly, I don’t get that. What am I missing here? You claim to know how, but do nothing? This simply makes no rational common sense.

    Again, name the legal case you are currently representing by your know-how. Criticism is “Easy”, and made by those which are “Followers”. Leadership is set by self examples and wisdom is gained through past knowledge/understanding coupled with several ounces of current applications of applied ability.

  36. little sir william,

    It was easily foreseeable that this would happen after these unsuccessfully litigated cases. I advised Mario 2 years ago that they needed to file upon Original Jurisdiction directly before SCOTUS and I drafted a Original Jurisdiction Brief for Orly.

    Mario responded but he was only interested in discussing what Orly said about him. I advised Mario that both Orly and I thought it was not advisable for him to sue Vice President Dick Cheney and the entire Congress because SCOTUS would never agree to hear a case that was based on clearly a political issue.

    I hope other eligibility lawyers learn from Mario’s Mistakes and file for Original Jurisdiction before SCOTUS. Of course, SCOTUS can not hear all these cases brought before it, but it only takes one to legally remove BO.

    Furthermore, I hope that other eligibility lawyers learn from Mario’s Mistake of guaranteeing dismissal of his case on political issue grounds by suing Vice President Dick Cheney and the entire Congress. No way that SCOTUS will ever hear a case like Mario’s that was clearly contrary to the ruling regarding political issue cases in Marbury v. Madison 5 U.S. (1 Crunch) 137, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803).

    http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/07/taking-aka-obama-directly-before-scotus.html

  37. little sir william,

    It was easily foreseeable that this would happen after these unsuccessfully litigated cases. I advised Mario 2 years ago that they needed to file upon Original Jurisdiction directly before SCOTUS.

    Mario responded but he was only interested in discussing what Orly said about him. I advised Mario that both Orly and I thought it was not advisable for him to sue Vice President Dick Cheney and the entire Congress because SCOTUS would never agree to hear a case that was based on clearly a political issue.

    I hope other eligibility lawyers learn from Mario’s Mistakes and file for Original Jurisdiction before SCOTUS. Of course, SCOTUS can not hear all these cases brought before it, but it only takes one to legally remove BO.

    Furthermore, I hope that other eligibility lawyers learn from Mario’s Mistake of guaranteeing dismissal of his case on political issue grounds by suing Vice President Dick Cheney and the entire Congress. No way that SCOTUS will ever hear a case like Mario’s that was clearly contrary to the ruling regarding political issue cases in Marbury v. Madison 5 U.S. (1 Crunch) 137, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803).

    http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/07/taking-aka-obama-directly-before-scotus.html

  38. little sir william,

    It was easily foreseeable that this would happen after these unsuccessfully litigated cases. I advised Mario 2 years ago that they needed to file upon Original Jurisdiction directly before SCOTUS.

    Mario responded but he was only interested in discussing what Orly said about him. I advised Mario that both Orly and I thought it was not advisable for him to sue Vice President Dick Cheney and the entire Congress because SCOTUS would never agree to hear a case that was based on clearly a political issue.

    I hope other eligibility lawyers learn from Mario’s Mistakes and file for Original Jurisdiction before SCOTUS. Of course, SCOTUS can not hear all these cases brought before it, but it only takes one to legally remove BO.

    Furthermore, I hope that other eligibility lawyers learn from Mario’s Mistake of guaranteeing dismissal of his case on political issue grounds by suing Vice President Dick Cheney and the entire Congress. No way that SCOTUS will ever hear a case like Mario’s that was clearly contrary to the ruling regarding political issue cases in Marbury v. Madison 5 U.S. (1 Crunch) 137, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803).

    http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/07/taking-aka-obama-directly-before-scotus.html

  39. The Bull Fighter Just Keeps On Caping

    The I think the suit of Purpua ET al is brilliant. It challenges the Constitutionality of the health care while including but not making Obama’s eligibility the only issue. But will it be heard? If so, will there be a judge willing to risk his life or his family’s life to rule in favor of the plaintiff?

    Watching two years of defeated effort by some of America’s brightest and bravest, I have come to view the government (mainly Obama’s regime) as a bullfighter. We the people are the bulls. The first thing done in a bull fight is to weaken the bull through the use of the picadors. When the weakened bull charges at the bull fighter, he “capes the bull” with a wave of the cape. The bull simply runs past him. This is repeated until eventually, the bull fighter kills the bull. Once in a great while a bull comes forward so brave, he lives. Once in awhile a great bull enters the ring and destroys the bull fighter!

    Case after case that has been brought to the government regarding any and all of Obama’s crimes have been “caped in that same manner.” If we don’t soon find a way to defeat this iron fisted Marxist Regime, we, too, will be slaughtered like the bull.

    The direct efforts of attacking the bull for the past two years have only brought us defeat. The regime has been weakening us by the use of more restrictive laws, denial to hear cases, and out right lawlessness. There hasn’t been one TV Station, TV news program host, newspaper, political candidate, politician in office or out who has really and truly confronted the real issues. Those issues are more than just Barry’s usurpation. It is time we take up the job and broadcast in any and all ways we can.

    In my some what alphabet soup mind, a thought keeps haunting me. While they have the power by the benefit of all the government agencies, the power to loot us, the power of lame stream media, and so called might, we are NOT POWERLESS because we have the greater numbers, the righteous constitution on our side, and most of all we have the just cause–“. . . self evident truth and inalienable rights under one God and one nation. . .” There are enough of us to organize a boycott of this government that could be done in many creative ways.

    What would the government do, if in protest we all failed to work for one day so that would be that much less taxes they could steal? What would it do if we all refused to fly commercially for just one week? What will it do if we all start (those who can) growing vegetable gardens in the name “return to the Constitution”? What would lame stream media do if we all put our money together to create a new TV station/net work that reports all the facts lame stream media refuses to report?

    How much would it take to get started? Let us guess –if at least 100,000,000 patriotics contributed just $5.00 to get the “Patriots for America” television network up and running. I believe there are at least 100,000,000 Americans extremely angry at this Marxists Regime. How long would it take before it would get the greatest ratings? How easy it would be to spin off an honest news paper that reported the facts and truth? This would be a 24/7 channel that would expose the Club 300’s manipulation of world events, the wicked plans of NOW –one world government, and their schemes to rid the planet of at least one billion “useless eaters”. This would not only bring the light of knowledge to the rest of the uninformed Americans, it would actually create profit (that dirty word) and even create jobs. We might have to begin this effort under ground—at first. With people power they would have to let us broadcast. I suppose I am still swimming in my alphabet mind soup.

    Imagine if we can bring back the kind of education our children used to get when we went to school. The true history of the founding of America was taught. Imagine if we could share our knowledge that those in support of Obama care and Obama policies are unwittingly complicit in the loss of their own freedom and turning themselves into slaves of the government?

    We should never give up the fight. However, we need to find newer, more creative, and effective ways to defeat the bull fighter. We need to learn how to learn from those past “capings” by the bull fighter and turn it on Barry. We now no longer need to prove Sotoero is a usurper ineligible to be the legal president of the United States. When the time comes when proof must be presented we have a very large war chest of proof with which we can batter him. Now we must make a united effort to come up with strategies that will remove him, and the approximately 3 to 5 thousand people who have been and continue to be complicit in this crime against America. We must commit to Save America for Americans here and now.

  40. Free Speech | January 18, 2011 at 1:41 pm |

    SirWilliam | January 18, 2011
    to
    Cabby – AZ | January 18, 2011 at 11:28 am |

    “Thanks. And by the way, how are you doing big guy? My apologies for not being able to have time to discuss critical topics on this blog with you, as you are a definite informed American Citizen. I dearly miss our conversations. ”

    ———————————————————————–
    So little sir william from your reference to your cohort cabby as a “big guy” it appears he (cabby) was LYING about his sex when he (cabby) said he (cabby) was a 77 year old woman?

    Or was he (cabby) merely confused about his gender as is BO and BO’s cohort the Arizona Killer Loughner?
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    FreeSheep,

    Are you just absolutely deranged and metally ill as the shooter in Arz. was? Seriously.

    My “Cohort” as you state, is somehow what? Explain Cohort relationship here. As in? Pro-Obama, Anti-American, Pro-Cuba, Anti-Capitalists, Pro-Capitalists, but Anti Free Republic, Pro- Republic and Anti – Illegal immigration, but Pro- obamacare, ect..

    What the hell are you referring to FreeSheep? Explain? Cohort. I can promise you this, Cabby ARZ is more of an American Citizen and Patriot then you will EVER BE in your lifetime. Is it Jealously on your part? It appears so.

    And please, copy and paste any statement made by Cabby ARZ, whereby his/her age is 77 years old, and by the way, still working as an “Accountant” in the private workforce, of which, every knows, but apparently you do not.

    Maybe your confusing Cabby with OldSalt. But again, that is not outside the scope of you screwing up information and posting crap you know nothing or very little about. It’s simply not beyond your stupidity.

    Just saying the obvious. Like you claim you know others AKA… B.S. you don’t. only wish others to believe you do.

  41. More and more regulations = more and more invasions of personal property and privacy. This is what continues while the lemmings want to believe that O is coming to the middle – just because of a speech! And if such sympathy and utter passivity gets him another 4 yrs. as Pres. these “little” beginnings will blossom into full blown totalitarianism overnight.

    LIFE WITH BIG BROTHER

    Feds come knocking for home inspections
    Some citizens outraged, calling probe ‘illegal search and invasion’ of property

    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=251069

  42. Strunk v Paterson (Obama): First time in the USA since 1824; Judge has opined on what Natural Born citizen is; Concludes Obama is not a NBC.

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/01/strunk-v-paterson-obama-first-time-in.html

  43. little sir william

    MARIO’S MISTAKE

    I understand that you do not understand the law.

    Even a 1st year law student would understand that there was NO WAY that SCOTUS will ever hear Mario’s case that was clearly contrary to the ruling regarding political issue cases in Marbury v. Madison 5 U.S. (1 Crunch) 137, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803).

  44. little sir william

    MARIO’S MISTAKE

    I understand that you do not understand the law.

    Even a 1st year law student would understand that there was NO WAY that SCOTUS would ever hear Mario’s case that was clearly contrary to the ruling regarding political issue cases in Marbury v. Madison 5 U.S. (1 Crunch) 137, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803).

  45. From: An email I just received:

    “BROTHERHOOD OF DARKNESS – SHOCKING, CONNECT-THE-DOTS EXPOSE OF GLOBALIST PLOT”

    “Do world events seem like they’re spinning out of control?

    Do the explanations you hear from government officials sound like they’re meant to mislead?

    Does the establishment news media leave you feeling like you’ve only heard part of the story – maybe even the wrong part?

    Why are groups like the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderbergers – groups whose members are obviously powerful with connections to wealth and political influence – never the subject of the evening news?

    Something’s happening here.

    Find out what in Dr. Stanley Monteith’s blockbuster exposé, “Brotherhood of Darkness.”

    Is there a grand conspiracy at work to move the world toward global ONE-WORLD government and a universal ONE-WORLD religion?

    Who or what is actually behind these sinister forces?

    Dr. Stanley Monteith, a medical doctor by training, set out on a mission to answer those questions some 40 years ago. The results of his startling research is this amazing, little book, a shocking exposé that shines the light of day on the secret societies – some of which have been at work on the world stage for centuries.

    “Most people don’t realize they exist because their minds have been conditioned to reject any thought of such organizations,” explains Monteith.

    This hard-hitting book names names, places, dates and full citations from primary sources. Monteith reveals the identity of the mysterious forces behind the men who rule the world, and why some U.S. leaders have dedicated their lives to destroying their own nation.”

    In this book, Dr. Monteith reveals the amazing facts he discovered in his nearly 40 years of research. He reveals the identity of the mysterious forces behind the men who rule the world, and why some of our leaders have dedicated their lives to destroying our nation. After reading
    “Brotherhood of Darkness,” you will never look at the world the same way again.

    This small book is divided into four sections and is packed with by names, places, dates and full citations from primary sources. Dr. Monteith reveals people, documents, and goals of secret societies and the financial elite. Though heavily researched and intricately documented, this book is concise and easy to read.

    Learn about and understand the many secret societies and how they have shaped the world. Dr. Monteith lifts the shroud of myth and doubt that surrounds the idea of a “sinister plan to shape the world” and reveals a shocking reality: there really is a grand conspiracy that has, for centuries, had the power to change world events.

    We are moving to world government and socialism—and it is crucial to understand the forces that have shaped the centuries thus far. The information in this book calls the reader to action, stating that if we as Christians do not rise up in opposition to evil, then we are considered its accomplices. It is our moral obligation to open our eyes and stand up to the invisible government that is running the world.”

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    About the Author:

    Researcher, author, and talk show host, Dr. Stanley Monteith has spent over 40 years studying the movement to create a world government. During his 35-year career as an orthopedic surgeon he traveled to Europe, lived in South Africa, and spent time researching the records of the men and organizations that are working to bring the United States under the control of a corporate elite, to deride our sovereignty as a nation, and to enslave the citizens of the world.

    http://superstore.wnd.com/books/Brotherhood-of-Darkness-book

  46. little sir william

    MARIO’S MISTAKE

    I understand that you do not understand the law.

    Even a 1st year law student would understand that there is NO WAY that SCOTUS will ever hear a case like Mario’s that is clearly contrary to the ruling regarding political issue cases in Marbury v. Madison 5 U.S. (1 Crunch) 137, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803).

  47. Observer | January 18, 2011 at 3:59 pm |
    More and more regulations = more and more invasions of personal property and privacy. This is what continues while the lemmings want to believe that O is coming to the middle – just because of a speech! And if such sympathy and utter passivity gets him another 4 yrs. as Pres. these “little” beginnings will blossom into full blown totalitarianism overnight.

    LIFE WITH BIG BROTHER

    Feds come knocking for home inspections
    Some citizens outraged, calling probe ‘illegal search and invasion’ of property

    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=251069

    —————————————————————–
    Well Stated, Observer!

  48. little sir william

    Re: MARIO’S MISTAKE

    I understand that you do not understand the law.

    Even a 1st year law student would understand that there is NO WAY that SCOTUS will ever hear a case like Mario’s that is clearly contrary to the ruling regarding political issue cases in Marbury v. Madison 5 U.S. (1 Crunch) 137, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803).

    http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/07/taking-aka-obama-directly-before-scotus.html

  49. MARIO’S MISTAKE

    little sir william,

    It was easily foreseeable that this would happen after these unsuccessfully litigated cases. I advised Mario 2 years ago that they needed to file upon Original Jurisdiction directly before SCOTUS.

    Mario responded but he was only interested in discussing what Orly said about him. I advised Mario that both Orly and I thought it was NOT advisable for him to sue Vice President Dick Cheney and the entire Congress because SCOTUS would never agree to hear a case that was based on clearly a political issue.

    I hope other eligibility lawyers learn from Mario’s Mistakes and file for Original Jurisdiction before SCOTUS. Of course, SCOTUS can not hear all these cases brought before it, but it only takes one to legally remove BO.

    Furthermore, I hope that other eligibility lawyers learn from Mario’s Mistake of guaranteeing dismissal of his case on political issue grounds by suing Vice President Dick Cheney and the entire Congress. No way that SCOTUS will ever hear a case like Mario’s that was clearly contrary to the ruling regarding political issue cases in Marbury v. Madison 5 U.S. (1 Crunch) 137, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803).

    http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/07/taking-aka-obama-directly-before-scotus.html

  50. I am dreaming of a day on CW where contributors post once or twice and leave air in the room for others to breathe… The truth needs to be stated only once; lies need to repeated over and over before exasperated readers are bullied into accepting them as having some ‘truthiness’.

  51. Sir William and Free Speech –
    It IS true that I told FS several days ago AFTER he told me to “get the h…..off of CW” that he was showing what kind of a man he truly is to talk to a 77-year old lady like that. The REAL TRUTH is that I just turned 77 years old a few days ago – I am a woman who lives about 100 miles from Phoenix, and that I DO still practice accounting on a semi-retired basis. FYI, I do have some very high level, important clients. For you to call me “big guy”, Sir William, I seriously call a compliment! So continue to do so. I am a woman who has been in the battle for many years (not just since Obama) in the efforts to restore our country to constitutional government.

    Lately I have been more of a lurker because of house guests and a heavier workload. Secondly, many here are discussing the ins and outs of the eligibility issue, which is good and necessary, imho, to a point. For me personally I need a little breather in order to get a better perspective of where we are exactly and also to give a little time to see exactly the direction that the House is going to take.

    I find it extremely puzzling that the several posters that FS seems to want to heckle or ban are those that bring much to the table as far as intelligent, constructive discussion is concerned. What is wrong with that picture?

  52. Bill G | January 18, 2011

    What “lies” are you referring to, carlyle’s, cabby’s or sir williams’s?

  53. Free Speech | January 18, 2011 at 1:41 pm |
    SirWilliam | January 18, 2011
    to
    Cabby – AZ | January 18, 2011 at 11:28 am |

    “Thanks. And by the way, how are you doing big guy?
    My apologies for not being able to have time to discuss critical topics on this blog with you, as you are a definite informed American Citizen. I dearly miss our conversations. ”

    ———————————————————————–
    So little sir william from your reference to your cohort cabby as a “big guy” it appears he (cabby) was LYING about his sex when he (cabby) said he (cabby) was a 77 year old woman?”

    Or was he (cabby) merely confused about his gender as is BO and BO’s cohort the Arizona Killer Loughner?

  54. bob strauss | January 18, 2011 at 10:35 am
    Orly said she tried to file with the SCOTUS but the clerk would not accept it, and refused several times.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Yes indeed bob straus. And at that point I and others urged her
    to go with Quo Warranto.
    Obviously judges in either case(s) are NOT performing their Constitutional duties, purposely avoiding the issues placed before them using the term
    “political question” and punting the ball back to Congress.

  55. FreeSheep,

    All I can say at this time, in liberty, is that you best from this point one, pick and choose your words carefully. You cannot change what you have already stated in attacks, or other claims, as they are logged and records. But I will say this in advise to you.

    From this point on, be very, very careful of your false claims, as they are not without repercussion, legally speaking. Once and only once, that I will state this. It’s not a matter to readdress.

    Just saying, what you don’t know, but I and a few others do.

  56. Orly said she tried to file with the SCOTUS but the clerk would not accept it, and refused several times.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Yes indeed bob straus. And at that point I and others urged her
    to go with Quo Warranto.
    Obviously judges in either case(s) are NOT performing their Constitutional duties, purposely avoiding the issues placed before them using the term
    “political question” and punting the ball back to Congress.
    ———————————————

    That’s odd, vic hern, because Orly never mentioned your name. BTAIMB, obviously a Quo warranto is RIDICULOUS.

  57. The GLOBE Magazine has a cover story on Obama’s thin
    appearance. But the inside article is actually all about his
    birth certificate ordeal!!

    The Globe is really keeping this story alive, and even quotes
    Tim Adams, who was the Hawaii Gov’t official who stated
    there wasn’t anything on file.

    Support the Globe this week!

  58. MARIO’S MISTAKE

    little sir william,

    Unlike you, little sir william, I always choose my words carefully.

    It was easily foreseeable that this would happen after these unsuccessfully litigated cases. I advised Mario 2 years ago that they needed to file upon Original Jurisdiction directly before SCOTUS.

    Mario responded but he was only interested in discussing what Orly said about him. I advised Mario that both Orly and I thought it was NOT advisable for him to sue Vice President Dick Cheney and the entire Congress because SCOTUS would never agree to hear a case that was based on clearly a political issue.

    I hope other eligibility lawyers learn from Mario’s Mistakes and file for Original Jurisdiction before SCOTUS. Of course, SCOTUS can not hear all these cases brought before it, but it only takes one to legally remove BO.

    Furthermore, I hope that other eligibility lawyers learn from Mario’s Mistake of guaranteeing dismissal of his case on political issue grounds by suing Vice President Dick Cheney and the entire Congress. No way that SCOTUS will ever hear a case like Mario’s that was clearly contrary to the ruling regarding political issue cases in Marbury v. Madison 5 U.S. (1 Crunch) 137, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803).

    http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/07/taking-aka-obama-directly-before-scotus.html

  59. Jay | January 18, 2011 at 5:11 pm |
    The GLOBE Magazine has a cover story on Obama’s thin
    appearance. But the inside article is actually all about his
    birth certificate ordeal!!

    The Globe is really keeping this story alive, and even quotes
    Tim Adams, who was the Hawaii Gov’t official who stated
    there wasn’t anything on file.

    Support the Globe this week!

    ——————————————————-

    Good idea, Jay.

  60. As I said FreeSheep,

    Your personal Attacks, false claims, and Defamation, are not going without notice. It is no longer a discussion. It is an investigation of legal pursuit. End of Story.

  61. Re: MARIO’S MISTAKE

    little sir william,

    Unlike you, little sir william, I always choose my words carefully.

    It was easily foreseeable that this would happen after these unsuccessfully litigated cases. I advised Mario 2 years ago that they needed to file upon Original Jurisdiction directly before SCOTUS.

    Mario responded but he was only interested in discussing what Orly said about him. I advised Mario that both Orly and I thought it was NOT advisable for him to sue Vice President Dick Cheney and the entire Congress because SCOTUS would never agree to hear a case that was based on clearly a political issue.

    I hope other eligibility lawyers learn from Mario’s Mistakes and file for Original Jurisdiction before SCOTUS. Of course, SCOTUS can not hear all these cases brought before it, but it only takes one to legally remove BO.

    Furthermore, I hope that other eligibility lawyers learn from Mario’s Mistake of guaranteeing dismissal of his case on political issue grounds by suing Vice President Dick Cheney and the entire Congress. No way that SCOTUS will ever hear a case like Mario’s that was clearly contrary to the ruling regarding political issue cases in Marbury v. Madison 5 U.S. (1 Crunch) 137, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803).

    http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/07/taking-aka-obama-directly-before-scotus.html

  62. How many corrupt Communist/Marxist/Fascist/Islamic Muslim/
    Stalinist/Leninist/or Nazi New World Order/One World Government Socialists have today actually infiltrated the USA government & are sitting in the 112th Congress today? Many of the above are working in the USA s college and university education systems and are in businesses in the USA.

    Here is the information from the former 111th CONGRESS:

    “HOW MANY SOCIALISTS SIT IN CONGRESS TODAY?”
    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=191609

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    “70 AVOWED SOCIALISTS IN U.S. CONGRESS – DSA LISTS MEMVBERS OF THE 11TH SESSION”

    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=191605

  63. How many corrupt Communist/Marxist/Fascist/Islamic Muslim/
    Stalinist/Leninist/Masons, or Nazi’s that are New World Order/One World Government Socialists have today actually infiltrated the USA government & are sitting in the 112th Congress today?

    Many of the above corrupt persons are working in the USA in high schools & in college and university education as teachers, and are working in businesses in the USA, and in the USA media.

    Here is the information from the former 111th CONGRESS:

    “HOW MANY SOCIALISTS SIT IN CONGRESS TODAY?”
    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=191609

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    “70 AVOWED SOCIALISTS IN U.S. CONGRESS – DSA LISTS MEMBERS OF THE 111TH SESSION”

    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=191605

  64. “Abercommie speaks again! Hawaii governor Neil Abercommie continues to blow smoke about his so-called ‘investigation’ into Obama’s vital records. The fact of the matter is all that needs to be done is for Obama to give the Hawaii DoH permission to release his ‘vital records’ on file, if any. It’s as simple as that!”

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/01/hawaii-governor-neil-abercrombie.html

  65. “WHAT OBAMA HAS SAID ABOUT HIS OWN BIRTH”

    By Jack Cashill

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/01/what_obama_has_said_about_his.html

    Excerpt:

    “There are clues in Dreams, however, which suggest that Obama was creating a fiction for future use that he already knew to be untrue. He tells of coming across an article from the Honolulu Advertiser celebrating Barack Obama, Sr.’s planned grand tour of mainland universities on his triumphant way to Harvard.

    Obama writes ruefully in Dreams, “No mention is made of my mother or me, and I’m left to wonder whether the omission was intentional on my father’s part, in anticipation of his long departure.” What Obama does not mention is that the article was dated June 22, 1962.

    Obama was reportedly born on August 4, 1961. He was not yet a year old at the time Obama Sr. left Hawaii for good. More to the point, Obama fails to mention that he and his mother, Ann Dunham, were living in Seattle at the time and had been since at least August 19, 1961, the day she enrolled at the University of Washington.

    In short, the family never lived together. There was no Obama family. The Obama camp surely knew this by the time he ran for president, but Obama kept dissembling about his origins nonetheless.”

    (snip)

    “Questions linger about the paternity of many of these offspring. In Dreams, Obama’s cryptic and contrarian Aunt Sarah would tell her presumed nephew, ” … the children who claim to be Obama’s are not Obama’s.” Obama must have wondered whether she was referring to him.

    Curiously, when Obama found the article about Obama Sr.’s departure, he found it “folded away among my birth certificate and old vaccination forms.” Later in Dreams, in a passage heretofore overlooked, Obama unwittingly reveals that there may have been problems with that birth certificate.

    On the occasion of his father’s death in 1982, lawyers contacted anyone who might have claim to the estate. “Unlike my mum,” Obama tells his half-sister Auma in Dreams, “Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark’s father was.”

    Ruth obviously could produce a marriage license and a birth certificate for her son Mark. Ann Dunham apparently could not do the same for her son Barack, at least not one that could tie him to Obama Sr. — not even with a potential payoff on the table.

    The long form birth certificate could pose a number of problems other than country of origin, including the date of Obama’s birth, the state of his birth, and the identity of his father. Any one of these revelations could unravel the yarn that Obama has been spinning.

    These problems derive from the fact that Ann Dunham enrolled at university on August 19, 1961 and returned to Hawaii only after Obama Sr. had left Hawaii for good. Both of these facts are more firmly established than President Obama’s Honolulu birth on August 4, 1961. In my forthcoming book, Deconstructing Obama, I review these possibilities in some detail.

    The failure of the mainstream media to even address the inconsistencies in Obama’s story is downright shameful. That failure has created a windstorm of curiosity that is becoming increasingly difficult for the media to ignore. The final responsibility for the outburst in Congress last week is theirs.”

  66. Received today a handwritten note from my Representative in Congress, a Republican. I have written him several times over the past two years regarding the NBC matter. He sent a type written letter in summer 2010 saying he would “vote on the issue if it came up for a vote”, not mentioning the issue but my letter was clear. The handwritten note was in reply to a letter I sent recently emphasizing my request he look into the NBC matter and take whatever action he could. His note dated 1/11/2011 to me said in part:
    “We are working hard at cutting the federal budget and restoring the people’s confidence that we will adhere to the Constitution.”
    I consider this an encouraging message and can understand his unwillingness to be out in front until a critical mass of his peers line up with him.
    My rep is a Christian and I plan to pray for him and ask my brothers at weekly Bible study to join me. With God, nothing is impossible!
    And I will keep the issue in the forefront of my dialog with him.

  67. “The Post & Email Speaks with “New ‘Speaker of the House’” Theresa Cao”

    “In response to Cao’s interruption in his reading, Pallone reportedly stated, “I mean it’s a fact that he’s a natural born citizen, so I think it’s just inappropriate for people to keep raising it. The problem is the people that keep raising it want to go against the facts…I think that was an example of this phenomenon today. There’s nothing he can do to make it go away because they just don’t want to face the facts.””

    http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/01/18/the-post-email-speaks-with-new-speaker-of-the-house-theresa-cao/

  68. WOW

    It just never seems to stop.
    Some days this place is
    like a pounding headache.
    Other days, it feels like a
    rat terrier biting our ankles.
    When will we be free?

  69. ObamaRelease YourRecords | January 18, 2011 at 4:01 pm |

    Strunk v Paterson (Obama): First time in the USA since 1824; Judge has opined on what Natural Born citizen is; Concludes Obama is not a NBC.

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/01/strunk-v-paterson-obama-first-time-in.html

    ========================================

    Has anybody been following this case? It seems like a big mess. That is not necessarily a disparagement – and may very well be a natural result of this bouncing around in the turmoil for YEARS already. But the fact remains that it is difficult or impossible for a mere mortal to get a grasp on it.

    I would like to see a synopsis, current status, critique of quality of the claim, next steps, likely outcome, when, etc. Hopefully from one of our valuable legal researchers or contributers (not Free Speech).

    To me the best I can distill out of it is that at a minimum it may be a way to address some of the games and withholds on FOIA requests. But like everything else, if it doesn’t come to closure soon, it will be too late.

  70. MUST SEE!!

    Former Sheriff Mack being interviewed:

    http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/1008.html

    “MEET JUDGE JOHN ROLL”

    “Widely respected.” “A wise jurist.”

    “The US news media heaped on the praise, but was purposefully vague about who this extraordinary judge was and what he actually did.

    The early and oft-repeated media claim “the judge was just in the wrong place at the wrong time” doesn’t ring true for several reasons, the most important being how the heck would they know and know so quickly?

    Equally as suspicious, why did they feel the need to repeat this statement over and over again from the very beginning of the reports? Who inserted this into the news stream?

    Judge Roll was an opponent of the Federal government overreaching its authority.

    Specifically:

    1. He ruled against federal imposition on states rights in gun law matters,

    2. He ruled against elements of the Patriot Act (the part where federal “law enforcement agents” can seize your bank account without cause), and

    3. He ruled against the newly announced FEMA Governor system in which the federal government plans to take the power of elected state Governors and put in in the hands of federally-appointed “regional” governors in the case of an “emergency.”

    It’s a rare judge these days that stands up to this BS or shows any interest in the Constitution at all.

    And he ended up dead in the parking lot of a Safeway Supermarket at the hands of a “lone nut” who local law enforcement allowed to run wild publicly making violent threats against employers and school administrators.”

  71. Rob | January 18, 2011 at 6:53 pm |
    OBAMA ORIGINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY HAWAII FROM BALLOT!

    http://noiri.blogspot.com/2011/01/obama-originally-disqualified-by-hawaii.html

    ————————————————–
    Thanks Rob

  72. MUST SEE!!

    “THE REAL ASSASSINATION TARGET IN TUCSON?”

    JUDGE JOHN ROLL?

    Commentary by Arizona sheriff

    Former Sheriff Mack being interviewed:

    http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/1008.html

  73. Starla | January 18, 2011 at 6:55 pm |
    MUST SEE!!

    Former Sheriff Mack being interviewed:

    http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/1008.html

    “MEET JUDGE JOHN ROLL”

    “Widely respected.” “A wise jurist.”

    “The US news media heaped on the praise, but was purposefully vague about who this extraordinary judge was and what he actually did.

    The early and oft-repeated media claim “the judge was just in the wrong place at the wrong time” doesn’t ring true for several reasons, the most important being how the heck would they know and know so quickly?

    Equally as suspicious, why did they feel the need to repeat this statement over and over again from the very beginning of the reports? Who inserted this into the news stream?

    Judge Roll was an opponent of the Federal government overreaching its authority.

    Specifically:

    1. He ruled against federal imposition on states rights in gun law matters,

    2. He ruled against elements of the Patriot Act (the part where federal “law enforcement agents” can seize your bank account without cause), and

    3. He ruled against the newly announced FEMA Governor system in which the federal government plans to take the power of elected state Governors and put in in the hands of federally-appointed “regional” governors in the case of an “emergency.”

    It’s a rare judge these days that stands up to this BS or shows any interest in the Constitution at all.

    And he ended up dead in the parking lot of a Safeway Supermarket at the hands of a “lone nut” who local law enforcement allowed to run wild publicly making violent threats against employers and school administrators.”

    —————————————————————————

    usapatriots-shout | January 15, 2011 at 12:32 pm |

    “I believe that if Obama fails to resign in 2011, the strong arm of Chicago crime influence in the White House will become increasingly evident. The screaming silence about the assassination of Judge John Roll is creating a very suspicious SMELL.”
    ——————————————————————-
    The Arizona Killer was a BHO Supporter. Congresswoman Giffords and Judge Roll were strong critics of the BHO regime’s aiding and abetting of the invasion of Mexican Terrorists into Arizona. BO incited his Supporter Arizona Killer Loughner to assassinate Judge Roll and Congresswoman Giffords with his violent rhetoric against Congresswoman Giffords and Judge Roll.

    ————————————————————————-
    http://www.therightperspective.org/2010/06/12/a-history-of-obamas-violent-rhetoric/

  74. Cabby – AZ | January 18, 2011 at 4:40 pm |

    Cabby, that was unbeknownst to me. But it matters not. You are a True American Patriot, well educated and obviously skilled in political concerns pertaining to Citizens.

    Not only do you deserve an American Salute, I would personally take you out to diner of your choice of Restaurant. Give you a big hug and kiss with thanks for being a true American.

    Keep up the good works Cabby, and you are more than welcome to email me anytime or pertain to discussions here. Either are acceptable. I appreciate you, as many others do.

  75. Rob | January 18, 2011 at 6:53 pm |

    OBAMA ORIGINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY HAWAII FROM BALLOT!

    http://noiri.blogspot.com/2011/01/obama-originally-disqualified-by-hawaii.html

    =====================================

    Does anybody know more about this? The credibility of the blog? The credibility of the writer? Is there REALLY an official investigation in HI? Did they discover or report something?

    Or this all fantasy and day dreaming? As you know I like questions. The questions at the end are good. But methinks the conclusions in the first part are a mixture of fact and speculation. The whole thing reads like wishful thinking. Alas.

  76. http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/

    New analysis of Democrat Party’s official 2008 Certification of Nomination for Obama reveals that reasons for his sudden trip to Hawaii in October, 2008 was to visit more than just his sick grandmother. Hawaiian election laws and post-dated documents reveal he may have attended a hearing with Hawaiian Chief Elections Officer regarding his disqualification from ballot due to lack of certified Constitutional eligibility.

  77. “OBAMA – TROJAN HORSE OF THE LEFT”

    http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/01/17/obama-trojan-horse-of-the-left/

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    “HE TRIED TO WARN US 120 YEARS AGO”

    http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/01/17/he-tried-to-warn-us-120-years-ago/

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

  78. “TELL CONGRESS YOU WANT OBAMACARE REPEALED”

    http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/01/16/tell-congress-you-want-obamacare-repealed/

    “… please help to drive a stake through the black heart of Obamacare.”

  79. “LETS MAKE THIS HAPPEN: CONGRESSIONAL REFORM ACT OF 2011″

    http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/01/18/lets-make-this-happen-congressional-reform-act-of-2011/

    Excerpt:

    “So there’s no reason why We the People can’t demand and pressure our supposed representatives to propose and approve the Congressional Reform Act of 2011. Here’s the proposal:

    1. Term Limits: Representatives in Congress can serve a maximum of 12 years:

    ■Two 6-year Senate terms; or
    ■Six 2-year House terms; or
    ■One 6-year Senate term and three 2-Year House terms

    2. No Tenure/No Pension: A Congressman collects a salary while in office and receives no pay when they are out of office.

    3. Congress participates in Social Security.
    All funds in the Congressional retirement fund move to the Social Security system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social Security system, and Congress participates with the American people.

    4. Congress can purchase their own retirement plan, just as all Americans do.

    5. Congress will no longer vote themselves a pay raise. Congressional pay will rise by the lower of CPI (Consumer Price Index) or 3%.

    6. Congress loses their current health care system and participates in the same health care system as the American people.

    7. Congress must equally abide by all laws they impose on the American people.

    8. All contracts with past and present Congressmen are void effective 1/1/11. The American people did not make this contract with Congressmen. Congressmen made all these contracts for themselves.

    Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, so ours should serve their term(s), then go home and back to work.

    Congressional Reform Act. Let’s make it happen!

    How?

    If we each contact a minimum of 20 people then it will only take 3 days for most people in the U.S. to receive the message. Tell your contacts about the Congressional Reform Act of 2011 and urge them to:”

    Read The Full Excellent Article Here:

    http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/01/18/lets-make-this-happen-congressional-reform-act-of-2011/

  80. That’s funny free sp.
    Orly never mentioned she knew of you either.
    Someone(s) of import was urging her in that direction,
    and I simply backed them up.
    That’s all

  81. I wonder if these BO Supporters are sorry about voting for BO yet?

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110118/ap_on_re_us/us_camden_layoffs

    Deep layoffs take effect in struggling NJ city

    CAMDEN, N.J. – Some firefighters turned in their helmets and police officers their badges Tuesday as part of deep municipal layoffs destined to further erode the quality of life in Camden, already one of the nation’s most impoverished and crime-ridden cities.

    About 335 workers, representing one-sixth of the local government work force, lost their jobs, according to Mayor Dana Redd. It was worst in the public safety departments, where nearly half the police force and close to one-third of the city’s firefighters were laid off.

  82. vic hern,

    I have emails and phone records of Orly’s daily contact with me in 2009 and you have nothing to support your allegations.

  83. Carlyle – all one needs to do is go to jbjd’s blog and look up her complaint for Hawaii. It is all there and has been there fore more than two years now.

    Secondly, the Daily Pen article points out, rather clearly, that the D Party in Hawaii refused to sign the necessary paperwork, along with a sworn statement, that 0 was eligible. What DP shows is that 0’s trips to Hawaii “to tend to grandma” were pure bs and rather grandma was used to give cover to the electoral/ballot process.

    Why do you think the fellow came out, what a year or more ago, to state for the record there is no Hawaii long form birth certificate and everyone in the Party knew it?

    All the DP has done is dig deeper into the process. I believe his hypothesis is correct.

  84. Observer – I listened to the Fife interview, again, today. Thank you for posting it and for encouraging others to contact this fellow to get this evidence of a communist puppet into the WH.

    Starla – it is called the New World Order of which George Herbert Walker Bush, Sr announced to the world on September 11, 2001.

  85. Hawaii guv can’t find Obama birth certificate

    http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=252833#ixzz1BRJWqnL8

    BORN IN THE USA?
    Hawaii guv can’t find Obama birth certificate
    Suggests controversy could hurt president’s re-election chances

  86. Just for you, Starla –

  87. What ya’ gonna do when they come for you, BO?
    —————————————————————

    Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie suggested in an interview published yesterday that a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for Barack Obama may not exist within the vital records maintained by the Hawaii Department of Health.

    Read more: Hawaii guv can’t find Obama birth certificate http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=252833#ixzz1BRKVglPT

  88. SirWilliam | January 18, 2011 at 5:24 pm |

    Hi SirWilliam,

    I know of another who’s walking down the same legal avenue.

    You are not alone!!!!

  89. Read more: Hawaii guv can’t find Obama birth certificate http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=252833#ixzz1BRKVglPT

    Looks like Fukino lied……..

  90. Another little tidbit re: interview with Fife:

    http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1099672/pg1

  91. It’s on Drudge, going viral!

  92. Yep, check the top of Drudge Report!

    Gov can’t find birth certificate!!

    Only some ” notation “, sounds like an easy forgery to me…

  93. Please help me make this go viral – Stuxnet worm is a violation of US Computer Security Law by Wayne Madsen. This post, by Wayne, clearly shows how those appointed by Obama broke our cybersecurity laws. More importantly, by understanding the magnitude of this post AND the NYT’s article today, you will see how the gubmint is trying to do harm to bloggers like CW, jbjd, free republic, the t-room and more via this worm. Please, read the article and then make it go viral. We need to stop this tromping on our rights forthwith!

    http://www.t-room.us/2011/01/stuxnet-a-violation-of-us-computer-security-law-%e2%80%93-cp-with-permission-from-wayne-madsen-reports/#more-2873

  94. Bill C. – posted the link from Drudge over at the T-Room.

    I must say that in the last 48 hours much activity has been swirling around the official cert of dunderhead. Whomever has unleashed and is driving this campaign I hope you have good insurance. I can’t imagine the New World Order cabal looking to kindly on you and your efforts.

    As one who counts herself as one of the “wittle sheople”, I can only say God Bless and Godspeed.

  95. I’m sure you do free up.
    I have emails I’m sure, but I shant bother to
    go find, I’ll just concede that you win. OK big man?
    My^ My!

  96. Free Speech,

    I have noticed your incessant posts which contain false statements about me and the Kerchner case. You clearly do not understand that Article III, Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution does not allow for original jurisdiction over eligibility cases, for they are not “Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party.” Additionally, Marbury v. Madison tells us that the U.S. Supreme Court cannot exercise original jurisdiction such as directly issuing a writ of mandamus to the President or one of his officers when the Constitution only gives it appellate jurisdiction over such matters. This is so even if Congress by statute tries to give the Supreme Court such original jurisdiction, for the Constitution is supreme and must be respected above any other law. So the very case that you cite informs that you cannot do what you are telling everyone I should have done.

    What is more amazing is that you put forth your incorrect argument that the U.S. Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over an eligibility case at the same time that you dismiss the Kerchner case on political question grounds.

    You also do not understand the political question doctrine. Your citing of Marbury v. Madison on the political question doctrine is misplaced. The case simply has no application in the Kerchner case as you cite it. Marbury v. Madison actually shows that there is no political question in the Kerchner case. The Court there stated “where the heads of departments are the political or confidential agents of the executive, merely to execute the will of the President, or rather to act in cases in which the executive possesses a constitutional or legal discretion, nothing can be more perfectly clear than that their acts are only politically examinable. But where a specific duty is assigned by law, and individual rights depend upon the performance of that duty, it seems equally clear that the individual who considers himself injured, has a right to resort to the laws of his country for a remedy.” The Court added that “[t]he province of the court is, solely, to decide on the rights of individuals, not to enquire how the executive, or executive officers, perform duties in which they have a discretion. Questions, in their nature political, or which are, by the constitution and laws, submitted to the executive, can never be made in this court.” The Court did not find any political question doctrine violation in Marbury because the law suit was not filed to challenge the President’s discretionary power to make Presidential appointments of political and confidential officers and agents who answer to him. Likewise, there is no political question problem in the Kerchner case. Obama does not have some discretionary power over whether or not he is a “natural born Citizen” and therefore eligible for office. Nor does Congress have any discretionary power to confirm a person for the Office of President who is not constitutionally eligible for that office. I showed that the Kerchner case did not depend on any executive or congressional discretion, but rather on specific constitutional provisions, acts of Congress, and general principles of law. Moreover, I showed that both Obama and Congress had under the 5th and 20th Amendments a specific duty assigned by the Constitution and that my clients’ rights depended upon their performance of that duty. I also showed that my clients had been injured as a result of their breach of that duty which necessitated the Court granting them a remedy. Finally, if you should not know, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals did not rule either way whether there was any political question doctrine problem in the Kerchner case.

    Why did we sue Congress in the Kerchner case? First, it violated its duty under the 20th Amendment to protect my clients’ 5th Amendment rights to life, liberty, safety, security, tranquility, and property by assuring them that only a qualified President-Elect, i.e., a “natural born Citizen,” was confirmed for the Office of President. Second, it is the only smart thing to do to sue a party to whom either the defense or the court or both will point and say that it is absent from the case when it should have been in the case because only that branch of government can provide the remedy requested by plaintiffs. Third, by suing Congress, the political question doctrine is avoided because we said that while Congress may have had the power to fix the wrong, it unconstitutionally refused to use that power to fix that wrong.

    Are you also not the one that was telling everyone that I sued each individual member of Congress and how did I expect to serve them all and take discovery from each of them? Such a false allegation clearly shows that you really do not understand much of how a legal action works.

    You have been camped out at the CitizenWells blog for some time now spreading false information about the Obama eligibility cases and the efforts of the eligibility attorneys. You make it your passion to be always the first one to start the thread and inject your propaganda into the discussion. I know what you are up to. Surely anyone with any reasonable intelligence can see right through your propaganda game and can conclude that you are not on our side.

    Mario Apuzzo, Esq.

  97. Please, anyone with posting rights at FreeRepublic, help.

    In the past several hours, I have received hundreds of hits from Free Republic, through links posted on a couple of their sites – “news” and “blogs” – by someone named Mortrey. FR banned me from posting on that site ever since I wrote the article favorably comparing Alan West and Barack Obama. (Guess my work is appreciated by the owners/moderators of that blog only when my thoughts are in lockstep with theirs. Obviously, their readers still appreciate my work.)

    The “news” post at FR is an article from WND, mentioning Gov. Abercrombie’s recent attempts to distance himself from comments he made in December on taking office, indicating he would solicit help from the HI AG regarding releasing Obama’s records. Mortrey posted a comment linking to the DE-CODER articles on my blog. But s/he does not link to the article specifically discussing my take on Abercrombie’s remarks and so, that article on my blog got only a dozen hits. This means, the Freepers are not reading that article!

    I desperately wanted to add a link/comment to that particular article. GOV. NEIL ABERCROMBIE (D-HI) TAKES ON LT. GOV. BRIAN SCHATZ for CRIMINAL ELECTION FRAUD at http://jbjd.org/2010/12/29/abercrombie-schatz-fraud/ As I am banned from posting at FR, could you post a link to my blog article on Abercrombie,
    on that news link to Freeper? http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2659289/posts

    Someone also asked whatever happened to “jbjd.” Well, as I am blocked from posting on that site, I cannot tell them! Can you? http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2659289/posts?q=1&;page=151

    Thank you!

  98. (This is from an e-mail received from Floyd Brown)
    Won’t Obama Simply Veto Legislation Repealing ObamaCare Anyway?

    Now you will hear those even on the right who cannot fathom why we should continue this fight. “Obama will simply veto any repeal of ObamaCare” they whine. To them we say “Let him try.” We dare you Barack Obama to stand in front of the American people and continually defend this Trojan Horse of Socialism.

    As a matter of fact, we WANT Obama to veto the bill to REPEAL ObamaCare. We want him to cast aside the desires of the American People like an old shoe….Why, you ask? Why do we want him to continue to treat the will of the American people like a fly… like some annoyance to be swatted away?

    Because the demands to repeal the radical Obama agenda are beginning to pile up and we want Obama to veto each and every one. He will have to defend his egregious actions and so will all the members of the House as well as the Senate that side with him and you can bet your last cent that we will be taking names.

    This is a very simple plan. We intend to grind Obama down. We will wear him out. And, make no mistake, THAT is his Administration’s worst fear. The “Chicago Mob” in the White House faers that the will of the American people is stronger and more enduring than their Radical Socialist Agenda. They know all too well that victory does not go to the sly but to those who endure until the end.

    If we keep up the fight, Obama will be paralyzed. He will be so busy defending ObamaCare day after day that he will barely have time to brush his teeth let alone force any other radical legislation on the American people.

    The professional Left and liberal media continue to tell you that fighting is pointless because they want you to give up. Because giving up is the only way that they can win. If we stay engaged with the new Congress we WILL win. The Obama agenda WILL crumble and we WILL be breath the air of freedom again.

  99. jbjd wrote:

    > Guess my work is appreciated by the owners/moderators of that blog only when my thoughts are in lockstep with theirs.

    Welcome to my world. drkate also approves postings only if my writings are in lockstep with hers.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s