Monthly Archives: March 2011

Trump Obama spends millions in legal fees, Avoid presenting birth certificate, Why has Obama employed attorneys?

Trump Obama spends millions in legal fees, Avoid presenting birth certificate, Why has Obama employed attorneys?

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

I have been stating for over a year that the fundamental question regarding Obama’s birth certificate, the “deer in the headlights” question is this:

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”

From Media ite March 28, 2011.

“Donald Trump continued with his mission to question the whereabouts of President Obama’s birth certificate, in an appearance on Fox & Friends this morning.”

“Trump admits there may be newspaper ads suggesting Obama was born in Hawaii, but claims there are a lot of reasons to explain the existence for such ads. And Trump declares Obama “spent millions of dollars trying to get away from this issue, millions of dollars in legal fees.” Apparently people are calling Trump from all over to not back down on this issue, and it seems he is listening to their advice as he repeatedly stressed here “if you’re not born in the United States, you cannot be President.””

Read more:

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/trump-on-birth-certificate-obama-spent-millions-of-dollars-trying-to-get-away-from-this-issue/

Blagojevich Second Trial, Spy Wednesday, April 20, 2011, Holy Week Catholic faith

Blagojevich Second Trial, Spy Wednesday, April 20, 2011, Holy Week Catholic faith

“Why did the Illinois Senate Health & Human Services Committee, with Obama as chairman, create and push Bill 1332, “Illinois Health Facilities Planning Act,” early in 2003, which reduced the number of members on the Board from 15 to 9, just prior to rigging by Tony Rezko and Rod Blagojevich?”…Citizen Wells

“Why did Patrick Fitzgerald and the US Justice Department prosecute Tony Rezko first and wait until after the 2008 election to arrest Rod Blagojevich?”…Citizen Wells

 

“I believe I’m more pristine on Rezko than him.”…Rod Blagojevich

From HuffPost Chicago March 28, 2011.

“Why is the second trial of former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich commencing on “Spy Wednesday”? This is not tongue-in-cheek. It’s true. “Spy Wednesday” this year falls on April 20th, the start date for the federal government’s second chance to throw the book at Blagojevich.

How did this happen? Was this date an accidental pick? Or on purpose? Who chose the date? Who knows? Maybe it was just the luck of the draw.

During Holy Week in the Catholic faith, “Spy Wednesday” is traditionally the day before Holy Thursday or Maundy Thursday, the day of commemoration of the Last Supper and when Jesus washed the Apostles’ feet.

In contrast with the Last Supper, “Spy Wednesday” is not exactly a holy day. It is a day that is notorious. It’s the day when Apostle Judas Iscariot offered to turn Jesus over to the Chief Priests of the Sanhedrin in exchange for thirty pieces of silver. It is a day of betrayal, of loyalty lost, of selling out.

But then again, maybe it is the perfect day to start this do-over. For those who view Blagojevich as an elected official who betrayed the public’s trust. A sellout. Versus those who see him as just another Chicago pol engaged in mere horse trading, spied upon by an overzealous federal prosecutor through the surreptitious taping of his phone conversations, the entirety of which have yet to be made public. You’ll recall Blago’s defense has been that the snippets released so far have been taken out of context, and if Judge James Zagel were to allow the entire conversations to be released, the tapes would exonerate him, not convict him.

Whatever happens, the public won’t get to see it. Again. Except for a lucky three dozen or so each day if the courtroom is the same small, crowded one used this summer. Over half the seats go to reporters. What’s left, the public gets to scramble for.

Yet with 40-some reporters there, don’t think you can see this trial at home or at the office on your laptop, television, cable or satellite. With the plethora of channels out there and the ever expanding means of communication, you would think someone could see this somewhere. Yet video isn’t allowed. No, sir. Not in federal courtrooms, thank you. Not even in the overflow courtroom which gets an audio feed but no faces to scrutinize, no expressions to read.”

Read more:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lonna-saunders/blagojevichs-second-trial_b_841089.html

I posted the following comment:

“A real trial with real witnesses like Tony Rezko or Stuart Levine with real questions would be refreshing­. Too bad they dropped counts 1, 2 & 4 which tie Obama to the corruption­.”

Jerome Corsi book video, Where’s the Birth Certificate?, Obama eligibility, Television ads

Jerome Corsi book video, Where’s the Birth Certificate?, Obama eligibility, Television ads

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

From World Net Daily March 27, 2011.

“Two-time No. 1 New York Times bestselling author Jerome Corsi, a Ph.D. in political science from Harvard and a senior staff writer at WND, has written a new book that promises to be a game-changer on the issue of Barack Obama’s eligibility.

It’s called “Where’s the Birth Certificate? The Case that Barack Obama is Not Eligible to Be President.”

The result of more than two years of solid investigative research by Corsi and a team of WND reporters and editors, this book is destined to be a huge bestseller and change the dynamics of the debate over eligibility – IF, of course, the book is not spiked by the hostile establishment media when it is officially released in May.

Advance orders for this book from retailers across the U.S. already suggest it will be Corsi’s third No. 1 New York Times bestseller – probably bigger than the previous two.

“Imagine how that will change the character of the debate on this critical constitutional issue,” says Joseph Farah, editor and chief executive officer of WND and WND Books, the publisher of “Where’s the Birth Certificate?” “Therefore, we have a strategy for promoting this book far and wide – going right over the heads of the hopelessly biased and politically correct press. But we need your help to pull it off.”

A series of television ads are now in production to ensure this book cannot be spiked by the Big Media. WND needs to raise hundreds of thousands of dollars to air these commercials on television networks and stations throughout the country.
“You can view the first TV spot right now and help us spread it across the Internet long before the book is even available,” says Farah. “Put it on your websites, your Facebook pages, send it to your friends by email and make sure they know how to donate to the cause – the cause of truth in the matter of Barack Obama’s eligibility for office.””

Read more:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=279357

Donald Trump on Geraldo Rivera, Obama birth certificate, There Is a Chance that He Wasn’t Born in this Country

Donald Trump on Geraldo Rivera, Obama birth certificate, There Is a Chance that He Wasn’t Born in this Country

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

Donald Trump was interviewed by Geraldo Rivera.

Geraldo: “There is something very Strange going on. He spent a lot of money to keep this out of print. There’s something very very strange going on. A lot of legal fees. Why can’t he produce a birth certificate?”

Theresa Cao update, March 24, 2011, Except Obama except Obama patriot, Attorney April Downs

Theresa Cao update, March 24, 2011, Except Obama except Obama patriot, Attorney April Downs

From the Post & Email March 23, 2011.

“Defendant Theresa Cao, who shouted “Except Obama!  Except Obama!” during the reading of the U.S. Constitution on January 6, met with her public defender on Tuesday, March 22, 2011, after initially having dismissed her on March 14, 2011, prior to her March 15 hearing.

Cao officially announced that she was firing Attorney April Downs in a Motion to Dismiss addressed to the government in which she referenced several articles published at The Post & Email and charged Barack Hussein Obama with treason.

Theresa gave her account of her meeting with Downs exclusively to The Post & Email.

SHARON: When did you meet with Ms. Downs?

THERESA: It was March 22 at noon, for about an hour; perhaps a little more.

SHARON: Did she have any reaction to your Motion to Dismiss which you introduced the day before your hearing?

THERESA: Yes.  After the last hearing, she asked to see the motion, so she saw what I wrote about her.

SHARON: And what was her reaction to that?

THERESA: Well, I tried not to talk about it; I just let her read and I tried to divert her, which sometimes left us at an impasse.

I believe that in my Motion to Dismiss, I was showing the judicial system that I have caught them in their corruption.  I put it all on paper that I could clearly read them and they are not who they say they are.  I have it all on paper.

SHARON: What do you think she thought of the information you included?

THERESA: This was another test for her, actually.  Remember she said that she was now going to defend me based on my constitutional rights?

SHARON: Yes, I remember.

THERESA: Well, clearly, in this particular meeting, again, she opposed me on basically everything that I wanted to have done based on my defense on the Constitution.”

Read more:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/03/23/speaker-of-the-house-theresa-cao-meets-again-with-defense-attorney/

Recent interview:

http://gulagbound.com/13974/gulag-night-guests-theresa-cao-state-persecution-monday

Patrick Fitzgerald Obama puppet, Fitzgerald bias, Fitzgerald nomination for FBI Director?

Patrick Fitzgerald Obama puppet, Fitzgerald bias, Fitzgerald nomination for FBI Director?

“Why did Patrick Fitzgerald delay the prosecution of Rod Blagojevich?”…Citizen Wells

“Why did Obama name Patrick Fitzgerald as chairman of the Attorney General’s Advisory Committee of U.S. Attorneys (AGAC)?”…Citizen Wells

“I believe I’m more pristine on Rezko than him.”…Rod Blagojevich

From the Chicago Tribune March 21, 2011.

“Republican Sen. Mark Kirk has three words for U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald: Stay in Chicago.

Fitzgerald’s name has surfaced among potential nominees to replace outgoing FBI Director Robert Mueller, whose nonrenewable term ends in September.”
“But Fitzgerald is a potential nominee who could have trouble with congressional confirmation. Some Republicans think he overreached in his prosecution of I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney’s former chief of staff, in the Valerie Plame affair.”

Read more:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-ap-il-kirk-fitzgerald,0,2395095.story

It is clear at this juncture that Fitzgerald is driven by political motives and other bias in the US Justice Department. His overzealous prosecution of Libby and Karl Rove and lackadaisical prosecution of Rod Blagojevich bear this out. It is clear that Fitzgerald, in lock step with the Justice Dept., has protected Obama.

Obama eligibility poll, Wenzel poll reveals 9 percent believe Obama documentation, World Net Daily poll

Obama eligibility poll, Wenzel poll reveals 9 percent believe Obama documentation, World Net Daily poll

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

From World Net Daily March 20, 2011.

“Not even one person in 10 believes Barack Obama has shown that he is eligible to be president of the United States, according to a stunning new scientific poll that also reveals political independents have less tolerance than even Republicans for his efforts to obfuscate the issue.

“The shocking result in this survey is that just 9 percent said they believe Obama has met the requirements to prove he was born in the United States and is therefore qualified to be president,” said Fritz Wenzel, president of Wenzel Strategies, which conducted the survey.

“Even when you combine those who say such questions are not valid with those who believe he has satisfied the requirements, it still falls short of equaling the percentage who said he should step forward and prove his birth origin once and for all,” he said.

Wenzel Strategies, an independent public opinion research firm based in Ohio, conducted a nationwide telephone poll using a randomly selected sample of adults. The survey, including 1,095 respondents, was conducted March 15-17 and carries a confidence interval of 95 percent and a margin of error of +/- 2.93 percentage points.
“The question of whether Barack Obama is eligible to hold the office of president is remarkable in that so many people are aware of the questions that remain unanswered. The survey shows that 77 percent are aware of the issue, and another 12 percent said they are unsure, which likely means they know a little but not enough to articulate details,” Wenzel said in his analysis of the results.

“Given the level of interest that the American public now devotes to politics, especially in an off-election year, this finding is remarkable. It speaks volumes about Obama’s unwillingness or inability to satisfy this question once and for all,” he said.

It was back in June 2009 when a Wenzel poll showed 51.3 percent were “aware of questions raised about Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility for the office of president.”

This month, 77 percent of the Democrats who responded said they are aware of the controversy. Nearly 82 percent of the Republicans are aware and almost 69 percent of the independents. Overall, 76.8 percent said yes, and another 11.7 percent said they were unsure. Only 11.5 percent said there were not aware of the questions.

“Half of those surveyed said they believe these questions about Obama’s legitimacy as president are either troubling or should be satisfied by Obama. In fact, more people want Obama to prove his legitimacy – 42 percent – than believe that the lingering questions are not valid – 32 percent,” Wenzel said.

The survey showed 41.9 percent say Obama should prove his birth story, including 60.9 percent of independents, 58.6 percent of Republicans and 13.2 percent of Democrats.”

Read more:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=276865