Obama on Rezko deal: It was a mistake, Chicago SunTimes, November 5, 2006, BY DAVE MCKINNEY AND CHRIS FUSCO, Obama regrets Rezko lot purchase

Obama on Rezko deal: It was a mistake, Chicago SunTimes, November 5, 2006, BY DAVE MCKINNEY AND CHRIS FUSCO, Obama regrets Rezko lot purchase

“Why did Mutual Bank fire whistleblower Kenneth J Connor after he
challenged the appraisal on the land purchased by Rita Rezko, just
prior to the land sale to Obama?”…Citizen Wells

“Where did Rita Rezko get the money to buy the lot she sold to Barack and Michelle Obama?”…Citizen Wells

The following article was presented by the Chicago SunTimes on  November 5, 2006. It has been quoted numerous times since then. The article disappeared from the internet quite some time ago due to what appears to be the standard policy of the SunTimes to not retain articles for any length of time. I cannot guarantee that this is the entire original article.

From the Chicago SunTimes November 5, 2006.

“Obama on Rezko deal: It was a mistake

November 5, 2006

BY DAVE MCKINNEY AND CHRIS FUSCO Staff Reporters Contributing: Mark Brown
U.S. Sen. Barack Obama expressed regret late Friday for his 2005 land
purchase from now-indicted political fundraiser Antoin “Tony” Rezko in
a deal that enlarged the senator’s yard.
“I consider this a mistake on my part and I regret it,” Obama told the
Chicago Sun-Times in an exclusive and revealing question-and-answer
exchange about the transaction.

In June 2005, Obama and Rezko purchased adjoining parcels in Kenwood.
The state’s junior senator paid $1.65 million for a Georgian revival
mansion, while Rezko paid $625,000 for the adjacent, undeveloped lot.
Both closed on their properties on the same day.

Sen. Barack Obama says he regrets purchasing land from politcal
fundraiser Antoin Rezko.

Last January, aiming to increase the size of his sideyard, Obama paid
Rezko $104,500 for a strip of his land.
The transaction occurred at a time when it was widely known Tony Rezko
was under investigation by U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald and as
other Illinois politicians befriended by Rezko distanced themselves
from him.

In the Sun-Times interview, Obama acknowledged approaching Rezko about
the two properties being up for sale and that Rezko developed an
immediate interest. Obama did not explain why he reached out to Rezko
given the developer’s growing problems.

Last month, Rezko was indicted for his role in an alleged pay-to-play
scheme designed to fatten Gov. Blagojevich’s political fund. Rezko
also was accused of bilking a creditor.

“With respect to the purchase of my home, I am confident that
everything was handled ethically and above board. But I regret that
while I tried to pay close attention to the specific requirements of
ethical conduct, I misgauged the appearance presented by my purchase
of the additional land from Mr. Rezko,” Obama said.

“It was simply not good enough that I paid above the appraised value
for the strip of land that he sold me. It was a mistake to have been
engaged with him at all in this or any other personal business dealing
that would allow him, or anyone else, to believe that he had done me a
favor,” the senator said.

The land deal came up in a court hearing Friday that delved into
Rezko’s finances. Obama said he has not been approached by federal
prosecutors about the transaction nor has plans to go to them about
it.

Obama and Rezko have been friends since 1990, and Obama said the
Wilmette businessman raised as much as $60,000 for him during his
political career. After Rezko’s indictment, Obama donated $11,500 to
charity–a total that represents what Rezko contributed to the
senator’s federal campaign fund.

After the controversy surfaced on Wednesday, the Sun-Times presented
Obama’s office with a lengthy set of questions about the land deal,
Obama’s relationship with Rezko and the story’s impact on a potential
2008 bid for the White House.

Here are his responses:
Q: Senator, when did you first meet Tony Rezko? How did you become
friends? How often would you meet with him, and when did you last
speak with him?
A: I had attracted some media attention when I was elected the first
black President of the Harvard Law Review. And while I was in law
school, David Brint, who was a development partner with Tony Rezko
contacted me and asked whether I would be interested in being a
developer. Ultimately, after discussions in which I met Mr. Rezko, I
said no.

I have probably had lunch with Rezko once or twice a year and our
spouses may have gotten together on two to four occasions in the time
that I have known him. I last spoke with Tony Rezko more than six
months ago.
Q:. Have you or your wife participated in any other transactions of
any kind with Rezko or companies he owns? Have you or your wife ever
done any legal work ever for Rezko or his companies?
A: No.
Q: Has Rezko ever given you or your family members gifts of any kind
and, if so, what were they?
A: No.
Q: The seller of your house appears to be a doctor at the University
of Chicago . Do you or your wife know him? If so, did either of you
ever talk to him about subdividing the property? If you ever did
discuss the property with him, when were those conversations?
A: We did not know him personally, though my wife worked in the same
University hospital. The property was subdivided and two lots were
separately listed when we first learned of it. We did not discuss the
property with the owners; the sale was negotiated for us by our agent.
Q: Did you approach Rezko or his wife about the property, or did they
approach you?
A: To the best of my recollection, I told him about the property, and
he developed an interest, knowing both the location and, as I recall,
the developer who had previously purchased it.
Q: Who was your Realtor? Did this Realtor also represent Rita Rezko?
A: Miriam Zeltzerman, who had also represented me in the purchase of
my prior property, a condominium, in Hyde Park. She did not represent
Rita Rezko.
Q: How do you explain the fact your family purchased your home the
same day as Rita Rezko bought the property adjacent to yours? Was this
a coordinated purchase?
A: The sellers required the closing of both properties at the same
time. As they were moving out of town, they wished to conclude the
sale of both properties simultaneously. The lot was purchased first;
with the purchase of the house on the adjacent lot, the closings could
proceed and did, on the same day, pursuant to the condition set by the
sellers.
Q: Why is it that you were able to buy your parcel for $300,000 less
than the asking price, and Rita Rezko paid full price? Who negotiated
this end of the deal? Did whoever negotiated it have any contact with
Rita and Tony Rezko or their Realtor or lawyer?
A: Our agent negotiated only with the seller’s agent. As we understood
it, the house had been listed for some time, for months, and our offer
was one of two and, as we understood it, it was the best offer. The
original listed price was too high for the market at the time, and we
understood that the sellers, who were anxious to move, were prepared
to sell the house for what they paid for it, which is what they did.

We were not involved in the Rezko negotiation of the price for the
adjacent lot. It was our understanding that the owners had received,
from another buyer, an offer for $625,000 and that therefore the
Rezkos could not have offered or purchased that lot for less.
Q: Why did you put the property in a trust?
A: I was advised that a trust holding would afford me some privacy,
which was important to me as I would be commuting from Washington to
Chicago and my family would spend some part of most weeks without me.
Q: A Nov. 21, 1999, Chicago Tribune story indicates the house you
bought “sits on a quarter-acre lot and will share a driveway and
entrance gate with a home next door that has not yet been built.” Is
this shared driveway still in the mix? Will this require further
negotiations with the Rezkos?
A: The driveway is not shared with the adjacent owner. But the
resident in the carriage house in the back does have an easement over
it.
Q: Does it display a lack of judgment on your part to be engaging in
real estate deals with Tony Rezko at a point his connections to state
government had been reported to be under federal investigation?
A: I’ve always held myself to the highest ethical standards. During
the ten years I have been in public office, I believe I have met those
standards and I know that is what people expect of me. I have also
understood the importance of appearances.

With respect to the purchase of my home, I am confident that
everything was handled ethically and above board.

But I regret that while I tried to pay close attention to the specific
requirements of ethical conduct, I misgauged the appearance presented
by my purchase of the additional land from Mr. Rezko. It was simply
not good enough that I paid above the appraised value for the strip of
land that he sold me. It was a mistake to have been engaged with him
at all in this or any other personal business dealing that would allow
him, or anyone else, to believe that he had done me a favor. For that
reason, I consider this a mistake on my part and I regret it.

Throughout my life, I have put faith in confronting experiences
honestly and learning from them. And that is what I will do with this
experience as well.
Q: Why did you not publicly disclose the transaction after Rezko got indicted?
A: At the time, it didn’t strike me as relevant. I did however donate
campaign contributions from Rezko to charity.
Q: Have you been interviewed by federal investigators about this
transaction or about your relationship with Rezko? If not, do you
intend to approach them?
A: I have not been interviewed by federal investigators. I have no
reason to approach them.
Q: Did Rezko or his companies ever solicit your support on any matter
involving state or federal government? Did Al Johnson, who was trying
to get a casino license along with Tony Rezko, or Rezko himself ever
discuss casino matters with you?
A: No, I have never been asked to do anything to advance his business
interests. In 1999, when I was a State Senator, I opposed legislation
to bring a casino to Rosemont and allow casino gambling at docked
riverboats which news reports said Al Johnson and Tony Rezko were
interested in being part of. I never discussed a casino license with
either of them. I was a vocal opponent of the legislation.
(http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/votehistory/srollcalls91/pdf/910SB1017_05251999_001000C.PDF)
Q: Has this disclosure about your relationship with Rezko changed your
thoughts about a White House run?
A: No. As I have said, how I can best serve is something I will think
about after the 2006 election next Tuesday.
Q: Did Rezko ever discuss with you his dealings with Stuart Levine,
Christopher Kelly or William Cellini or the role he was playing in
shaping Gov. Blagojevich’s administration?
A: No.
Q: Are the Obamas the only beneficiaries of the land trust?
A: Yes.
Q: Are you aware of any efforts by previous owners to develop what is
now the Rezko lot, possibly as townhomes?
A: I was not aware of any prior effort by the seller to develop the
property, but always understood the other lot was to be developed upon
sale.
Q: Did Rezko have an appraisal performed for the 10-foot strip?
A: I had an appraisal conducted by Howard B. Richter & Associates on
November 21, 2005.
Q: Was there a negotiation? Did he have an asking price, or did he
just say, whatever you think is fair?
A: I proposed to pay on the basis of proportionality. Since the strip
composed one-sixth of the entire lot, I would pay one-sixth of the
purchase price of the lot. I offered this to Mr. Rezko and he accepted
it.
Q: How many fundraisers has Mr. Rezko hosted for you? Were these all
in his home? How much would you estimate he has raised for your
campaigns?
A: He hosted one event at his home in 2003 for my U.S. Senate
campaign. He participated as a member of a host committee for several
other events. My best estimate was that he raised somewhere between
$50,000 and $60,000.”

Original link.

http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/124171,CST-NWS-obama05.article

About these ads

90 responses to “Obama on Rezko deal: It was a mistake, Chicago SunTimes, November 5, 2006, BY DAVE MCKINNEY AND CHRIS FUSCO, Obama regrets Rezko lot purchase

  1. 1.5 hours of my 4 hour drive today wasted listening to Rush Libtard going on about Herman Cain’s women problems for his freinds at the Liberal Politico blog.

  2. BTW if you appose Cain or Rubio, according Rush Libtard you are most likley a d – rat.

  3. All,
    If you haven’t had the opportunity to read the entries on a recent Blog called “Terrible Truth” there is one entry that suggests the motivation of Barack’s for this actual home purchase. The two researchers that maintain this Blog have some interesting theories on just who Barack Obama actually is. Interesting reading and one more site to watch for information. //Michigan-Patriot
    http://terribletruth.wordpress.com/

  4. In April of 2005 less than 3 months befort this purchase Tony Rezko received a loan for $3.5 million dollars from Nadmi Auchi….3 months after the home purchase Tony Rezko received another $11 million dollars from Nadmi Auchi….Then again in September of 2007 Tony received another $3.5 million which he wound up in jail over for not reporting it to the feds.

  5. http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/11/is-barack-hussein-obama-ii-really-bari.html
    Is Barack Hussein Obama II Really Bâri′ M. Shabazz, Born October 28, 1959 in New York City?
    By Mario Apuzzo, Esq. November 2, 2011

  6. Gotta say one thing……..

    Those damn Muslims hang together don’t they!…and don’t you dare ask for an idenity card.

  7. Was Cain a Trojan horse sent in to the Republican camp ?

    Another sexual harrassment charge has surfaced at Liberla Politico, no doubt Rush libtard will read word for word tomorrow.

  8. Liberla

    Liberal

  9. Is Barack Hussein Obama II Really Bâri′ M. Shabazz, Born October 28, 1959 in New York City?
    By Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
    November 2, 2011

    http://terribletruth.wordpress.com/2011/11/02/bari%e2%80%b2-barry-barack/
    __________________________________________

    And Pat1789, I don’t know what station you were listening to for Rush today but the accurate one had him defending Mr. Cain and pointing to all the obvious hatred against him and the stoopid atty and reporters: accusing him for not answering their questions while saying too much.

    Only person I see as defending the libtard accusers and their ilky press attackers while lying about Rush is yourself.

  10. “A TIME FOR STATESMEN”

    Tony Blankley
    November 1, 2011

    Excerpt:

    “Now is a particularly dangerous moment for American national security interests. Not just because threats are growing. Not just because the current administration is making a historic bungle from China to Iraq to Iran to Russia to Europe to Mexico to our historic allies in the Middle East — both Jewish and Muslim. All that would be bad enough.

    But the greatest threat to our national security, at the moment, is the manifest indifference of the voting public to these foreign threats — and the silence on them from our alleged leaders. It’s understandable.

    The devil has our economy by the throat, and Americans (when they think about politics) are focused on what Washington should do — or should stop doing — to defeat our domestic economic threat.

    Obviously, the public is in no mood to go looking for foreign devils. Every 27-year-old junior Washington political operative knows this is a political season to advise candidates to talk about jobs, jobs, jobs. And they should.”

    [...]

    “But not a peep was heard form our government or, to the best of my knowledge, from any senior Washington politician of either party.

    This should have sent shock waves across America. It also should have been thrown down at the door of the super committee to not disembowel our defense budget in the face of the coming danger.”

    Read More Here: http://townhall.com/columnists/tonyblankley/2011/11/02/a_time_for_statesmen/page/full/

    * * * *

    “BIG SIS GIVES MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD SECRET CLEARANCE”

    Pamela Geller
    Defending The West
    WorldNetDaily Exclusive Commentary
    © 2011
    November 1, 2011

    Excerpt:

    “[...] I-N-F-I-L-T-R-A-T-I-O-N.

    The government increasingly aligns with our mortal enemies. Steel yourselves.”

    Read More Here: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=362889

    * * * *

    “SHERIFF JOE: ‘SHOW ME THE MICROFILM’”

    “ARIZONA LAWMAN BEHIND CALL FOR ORIGINAL DOCUMENTATION OF
    OBAMA’S BIRTH”

    By Jerome R. Corsi
    WorldNetDaily Exclusive
    © 2011 WND
    November 1, 2011

    Read More Here: “Sheriff Joe: ‘Show Me The Microfilm!’” http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=363025#ixzz1caUeUWLH

    An Excellent Comment Under The Above Article Is From:

    “Joyce Perdue · Niagara Falls, New York

    It is true that he is nothing but lying every time he opens his mouth. But isn’t the whole govt and every segment of our society now nothing buy lies? The press and news media…including Fox News lie and lie and lie! If it were not for those telling the truth to us like WND and Alex Jones, and Rick Wiles on Trunews…all we would know would be the lies. Our great country is no longer a great country but a country that murders by the millions with our fake wars the innocent, the littlest American citizens in the wombs, the drug murders….when it is the US Govt that transports the drugs for money and profit. They murder us with the medicines we are given, the lack of care in the hospitals, and it is all about money….murdering, murdering, murdering. We have kicked Christ out of our country…..and brought in the Muslims with their evil religion which is just another murderous part of our society now…..and Eugenics in every segment of our society. Christ is no longer wanted in our country so now we have become beyond evil….and the fruit of our ways will bring vast and fierce judgment till there is nothing left. And we did it to ourselves!”

    * * * *

  11. “A TIME FOR STATESMEN”

    Tony Blankley
    November 1, 2011

    Excerpt:

    “Now is a particularly dangerous moment for American national security interests. Not just because threats are growing. Not just because the current administration is making a historic bungle from China to Iraq to Iran to Russia to Europe to Mexico to our historic allies in the Middle East — both Jewish and Muslim. All that would be bad enough.

    But the greatest threat to our national security, at the moment, is the manifest indifference of the voting public to these foreign threats — and the silence on them from our alleged leaders. It’s understandable.

    The devil has our economy by the throat, and Americans (when they think about politics) are focused on what Washington should do — or should stop doing — to defeat our domestic economic threat.

    Obviously, the public is in no mood to go looking for foreign devils. Every 27-year-old junior Washington political operative knows this is a political season to advise candidates to talk about jobs, jobs, jobs. And they should.”

    [...]

    “But not a peep was heard form our government or, to the best of my knowledge, from any senior Washington politician of either party.

    This should have sent shock waves across America. It also should have been thrown down at the door of the super committee to not disembowel our defense budget in the face of the coming danger.”

    Read More Here: http://townhall.com/columnists/tonyblankley/2011/11/02/a_time_for_statesmen/page/full/

    * * * *

    “BIG SIS GIVES MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD SECRET CLEARANCE”

    Pamela Geller
    Defending The West
    WorldNetDaily Exclusive Commentary
    © 2011
    November 1, 2011

    Excerpt:

    “[...] I-N-F-I-L-T-R-A-T-I-O-N.

    The government increasingly aligns with our mortal enemies. Steel yourselves.”

    Read More Here: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=362889

    * * * *

    “SHERIFF JOE: ‘SHOW ME THE MICROFILM’”

    “ARIZONA LAWMAN BEHIND CALL FOR ORIGINAL DOCUMENTATION OF
    OBAMA’S BIRTH”

    By Jerome R. Corsi
    WorldNetDaily Exclusive
    © 2011 WND
    November 1, 2011

    Read More Here: “Sheriff Joe: ‘Show Me The Microfilm!’” http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=363025#ixzz1caUeUWLH

    An Excellent Comment Under The Above Article Is From:

    “Joyce Perdue · Niagara Falls, New York

    It is true that he is nothing but lying every time he opens his mouth. But isn’t the whole govt and every segment of our society now nothing but lies? The press and news media…including Fox News lie and lie and lie! If it were not for those telling the truth to us like WND and Alex Jones, and Rick Wiles on Trunews…all we would know would be the lies. Our great country is no longer a great country but a country that murders by the millions with our fake wars the innocent, the littlest American citizens in the wombs, the drug murders….when it is the US Govt that transports the drugs for money and profit. They murder us with the medicines we are given, the lack of care in the hospitals, and it is all about money….murdering, murdering, murdering. We have kicked Christ out of our country…..and brought in the Muslims with their evil religion which is just another murderous part of our society now…..and Eugenics in every segment of our society. Christ is no longer wanted in our country so now we have become beyond evil….and the fruit of our ways will bring vast and fierce judgment till there is nothing left. And we did it to ourselves!”

    * * * *

  12. observer | November 2, 2011 at 5:29 pm |

    Go ahead and shoot the messenger, Rush Libtard attacks Republicans to help Obama. Facts are Facts, he does it everyday.

    Michael Steele called him out the other day ( not by name) but it was obvious who he was talking about.

    Tomorrow he will read from Politico for 3 hours straight and ignore Obama crimes. Bank on it.

  13. Cain and Perry in all out slugfest. Their both toast.
    Romney will be the nominee by Mid Feb.
    Unfortunately, Cain is probably ouit as VP. To bad.

  14. ouit

    out

  15. So what will happen when Romney locks it up early.
    Well Rush Libtard and other faux news conservatives will attack him for d-rats all the way to the election.

    Just like 2008

    http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/michael_medved_rush_limbaugh_is_acting_like_a_liberal/

  16. Pat 1789 | November 2, 2011 at 6:50 pm |

    You need your antennae retuned. The enemy ain’t on the side you imagine. Perry’s unsober public events are shooting him in the foot….who knows what’s going on there.

  17. Pat 1789 | November 2, 2011 at 7:06 pm | So what will happen when Romney locks it up early.
    Well Rush Libtard and other faux news conservatives will attack him for d-rats all the way to the election.
    ————————————————-
    What will it matter when you’ll get what you already have now. Truth’s the truth. Don’t like hearing it don’t listen. In Romney’s case you’re the one apparently trying to make a silk purse out of that lesser material….. to be kind.

  18. Some Important Information………

    “IF SHERIFF JOE ARPAIO CAN INVESTIGATE OBAMA”
    “WHY NOT SHERIFF ROBERT M. HUSTON?”

    By Michael D. Jackson
    November 1, 2011

    Read More Here: http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/11/01/if-sheriff-joe-arpaio-can-investigate-obama/

    Comments Under This Article Include:

    “ThepaidTroll says:
    Tuesday, November 1, 2011 at 9:26 PM

    According to todays WND, Sheriff Arpaio”s Posse has determined that in order to come to any conclusion, they must first obtain Obama’s original Birth Certificate or a Certified copy from the State of Hawaii.

    Since Hawaii will not release the Birth Certificates of any of its citizens without the permission of the birth subject and since neither Sheriff Arpaio nor his posse have no authority whatsoever to force Hawaii to release Obama’s Birth Certificate, what WND is saying is that Sheriff Arpaio’s investigation is dead in the water.

    Knowing this, what real difference other then making you feel better are you claiming that will be served by having Sheriff Huston go through the same process and come to the same conclusion?
    ——————-
    ***** Mrs. Rondeau replies: There is a Hawaii statute which grants permission to any law enforcement officer in the country requesting documents in the course of a criminal investigation:”

    http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2007/bills/sb1326_sd1_.pdf

    * * * *

    “ThepaidTroll says:
    Wednesday, November 2, 2011 at 10:20 AM

    To Ms Rondeau and Challenger,

    The statute that you are referring to that amends Section 338-18, Hawaii Revised Statutes to authorize the Hawaii department of health to provide certain public health records to law enforcement officers to facilitate criminal investigations is Hawaii State Senate Bill 1237.

    However, if you read section 3 of the bill you will discover that it does not take effect until July 1st of the year 2050.

    Pursuant to current Hawaii law, Hawaii will not release the Birth Certificates of any of its birth subjects without the express permission of the birth subject absent a court order.

    So far, no Hawaii Court or US Federal court has issued such an order and there is no indication that any court intends to issue such an order to allow Sheriff Arpaio or any other law enforcement officer access to the Birth Certificate.”

    [My question: Is this info in any way true or not from: " thepaidTroll?"]

    * * * *

    “challenger says:
    Wednesday, November 2, 2011 at 7:51 AM

    I would add to Mrs. Rondeau’s response that if Sheriff’s Arpaio’s demand for the best evidence is not forthcoming from Hawaii, it is not likely the State of Arizona’s Secretary of State is going to certify Obama’s name on their 2012 ballot.”

    * * * *

    “RacerJim says:
    Wednesday, November 2, 2011 at 11:05 AM

    And to the responses of Mrs. Rondeau and “challenger” I would like to add that if said best evidence is not forthcoming from the State of Hawaii or Obama, it would be incumbent upon Sheriff Joe Arpaio to demand that Arizona State’s Attorney General file:

    a) Federal document and/or election fraud charges against Nancy Pelosi (2008 Chair of the Democratic National Convention) and Alice Travis Germond (2008 Secretary of the Democratic National Convention) for signing then submitting a 2008 DNC “Official Certificate Of Nomination” (“OCON”) lacking the required eligibility phrase “under provisions of the United States Constitution.” and;

    b) Dereliction of Duty/Malfeasance in Office charges against Janice K. Brewer (2008 Arizona Secretary of State/Chief Elections Officer and every 2008 Electoral College member from Arizona for either not noticing or ignoring the lack of “under provisions of the United States Constitution>” on the DNC’s 2008 OCON.”

    * * * *

    Some Comments Under This Article: http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/11/sheriff-joe-show-me-original-not-3.html#comments

    “Anonymous said…

    The powers that be will never show the real thing, be it on microfilm or paper. How can anyone doubt that obama is hiding something big?

    The burden of proof is on obama. NO proof? No job for obama!

    One question for Congress, judges, law enforcement officials, all people with the power, media, presidential candidates……:

    Why do you treat obama like he is above all laws?

    Sheriff Joe, please exercise your rightful authority to enforce the laws, in this case, refusing to provide authentic documentation/proof of citizenship status, is same as no proof, therefore, no placement of o’s name on the state’s ballot. Period.

    Calling all AZ citizens – Ddemand en masse to your SOS that obama’s name cannot be placed on the ballot until he shows authentic proof of his constitutional eligibility! By that we mean not just empty but sworn words from the DNC’s candidate nomination paper without any genuine supporting documents or proof!

    Sheriff Joe can’t do it alone, We the people must swarm the SOS with this legitimate demand!”

    * * * *

    “Dealio said…

    If every sheriff of every county were to receive evidence of the illegal and the crimes he’s committed, we’d all be deputized and asked to join the sheriffs on a historic march on the capitol to arrest the illegal.” November 1, 2011 9:16 PM

    “Mairi said…

    You don’t have to wait! The Veteran Defenders will be marching on D.C. on 11/11/11. I WISH those who participate could decide to “Occupy D.C.” until our grievances are addressed. I am PRAYING that everyone who marched with the Tea Party will go and bring at least three “newbies” along with. That would certainly shut down D.C., and we all know there is far less damage being done when they are NOT working.” November 1, 2011 10:55 PM

    “Anonymous said…

    What, no subpoenas? Weak.”

    * * * *

    An Excellent Comment From:
    http://drkatesview.wordpress.com/2011/10/29/the-mockingbird-sings-desperate-obama-and-the-coming-false-flags/#comments

    “drkate –
    October 31, 2011 at 8:22 pm

    The surprise is that the Sheriff will not permit him on the ballot, and could issue a restraining order against AZ SOS for certifying.”

    * * * *

  19. Cain blaming this on Perry. No surprise as Cain has been sucking all the oxygen away from Perry lately. But now there is a third woman and a witness coming forward. Four people involved does not give me a good feeling about this. I don’t like a hit job on Cain, but I also continue to be nervous about Cain in general.

  20. “MORE GUNS PROVIDED THROUGH FAST AND FURIOUS FOUND IN ARIZONA RAID”

    Katie Pavlich
    November 2, 2011

    Excerpt:

    “Since finding out about Operation Fast and Furious, Arizona Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu has been anything but amused. With no regard for local law enforcement, the Obama Justice Department supplied the most dangerous criminals in North America with high powered weapons, including .50-calibur sniper rifles and AK-47s, leading to the death of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry and at least 200 innocent Mexican citizens. Now with the Southern border still wide open, Babeu and his deputies will face the barrels of those guns as they do their job to combat Mexican drug cartels illegally operating in Arizona.

    Today, Babeu’s office confirmed two guns found during a massive drug smuggling bust against the Sinaloa Cartel in Pinal County, were provided through Operation Fast and Furious.

    “I am outraged our Federal Government has armed one of the largest and most dangerous of the Mexican drug cartels with as many as 2,000 high powered weapons. This is the same cartel we have been investigating for the past fifteen months for various crimes including a murder in my County. We have arrested 76 suspects and seized 108 weapons. We have now have learned two of the weapons we seized are in fact linked to Operation Fast and Furious. U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry was only doing his job when he was viciously murdered by Mexican bandits with Fast and Furious weapons. Thankfully none of our members were murdered this time,” Babeu tells Townhall.”

    Read More Here: http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2011/11/02/more_guns_provided_through_fast_and_furious_found_in_arizona_raid

  21. “MORE GUNS PROVIDED THROUGH FAST AND FURIOUS FOUND IN ARIZONA RAID”

    Katie Pavlich
    November 2, 2011

    Excerpt:

    “I sat down with Sheriff Babeu in September when he warned of this very situation, noting that guns will be recovered at violent crime scenes for years to come.

    “It’s not going to end, there are at least 1500 guns out there and we have no clue where they are,” Babeu said.

    While Sheriff Babeu and his deputies are doing their best to fight these cartels with limited resources, the Obama Justice Department has been arming the enemy with weapons Babeu’s deputies don’t even have.

    “Outrage and betrayal. This has never happened before in the history of our country. We may have given armaments and weapons to our allies who may have later become our enemy, but we’ve never given them directly to our enemy,” Babeu said when asked about his initial reaction to Operation Fast and Furious.

    “These are the most violent criminals in North America and we facilitated and gave weapons, weapons that my deputies don’t even have, to these cartels,” he said. “It’s more than insane, it is horrific to think that our own government did this.”

    Read More Here: http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2011/11/02/more_guns_provided_through_fast_and_furious_found_in_arizona_raid

  22. @ Tina

    The chattering class including Rush libtard has been selling this Trojan Horse to conservatives for weeks now. I never heard of the man until 6 months ago. The establishment RINOS ( and yes Rush is one of them) think the only way to win is with a Black or Latino on the ticket.

    @ observer | November 2, 2011 at 7:27 pm |

    Your man Cain is done, and he only has hisself to blame.
    So you and Libtard Rushbo can share some tears tomorrow and play the race card etc…. Pathetic…..

    Take it to the bank, El Libtardo will spend 3 hours tomorrow trying to save the Trojan Horse. And when that effort fails, he will turn his sights on Romney to help reelect b-ho.

  23. Pat 1789 | November 2, 2011 at 9:34 pm |
    Your man Cain …….
    _______________________________
    A projection from your misinformed mind. The discussion was your unfounded paranoia about some kind of Trojan Horse and dislike or jealousy of Rush….why that is, since your referenced programs demonstrate just the opposite, most people here haven’t the vaguest!

  24. Pat 1789 | November 2, 2011 at 6:50 pm

    Go ahead and shoot the messenger, Rush Libtard attacks Republicans to help Obama.

    Pat 1789 (et al) | November 2, 2011 at 9:34 pm |

    Take it to the bank, El Libtardo will spend 3 hours tomorrow trying to save the Trojan Horse.
    ———————————————
    So you’re saying that Rush will try to save a Republican after saying all he does is attack Republicans. As usual the “logic” isn’t there in the argument.

    Now follow up with more insults to try to cover the illogical rant.

  25. Mark Levine has ab interesting perspe

  26. Mark Levine has an interesting perspective on the whole Cain deal. There is almost no way that Cain can defend himself. The so called press is partaking in mass journalistic malpractice.

  27. Cain comitted political suicide on Fox while being interviewed by CK today. It’s over…

  28. Paxson | November 2, 2011 at 10:09 pm |

    Levin can blame it on the press and would be only partly right.

    Cain’s campaign blew this and so did Cain himself. CK called him Clintonesqe in his responce. Ouch…….

  29. observer | November 2, 2011 at 9:57 pm |

    Why don’t you get back to us when your boy Rush tard takes up the eligibility of Marco Rubio. LMAO

  30. observer | November 2, 2011 at 9:57 pm |
    (your response to Pat 1789)
    “Now follow up with more insults to try to cover the illogical rant.”
    *********************************
    Observer, I share your feeling. I can’t follow Pat 1789′s logic as having any real meaning. It’s rash and makes little sense to me.

  31. Pat 1789 | November 2, 2011 at 10:20 pm |
    Cain’s campaign blew this and so did Cain himself. CK called him Clintonesqe in his responce. Ouch…….
    *******************
    Charles Krauthammer is rather a beltway elitist, and although I like him on most things, he is off-base quite often lately on a number of subjects. I’m getting tired of some of these talking heads having such an aura of arrogance with the idea that they are the final authority on all subjects.

  32. Obama talks and acts just like malcolm x time to spread the word

  33. Pat 1789 | November 2, 2011 at 10:27 pm | observer | November 2, 2011 at 9:57 pm |

    Why don’t you get back to us when your boy Rush tard takes up the eligibility of Marco Rubio. LMAO

    ———————————————–
    Can’t stay on topic and take the results from your own illogical rants so deflect instead. BTW, have fun sitting without your A that you LO!!!! Must be painful!!

  34. Cabby – AZ | November 2, 2011 at 10:40 pm |
    ———————————-
    Tend to agree about Krauthammer lately. As a psychiatrist he ought to appreciate when a man is damned if he does and damned if he doesn’t….in the case of Cain….he’s being yelled at for not saying enough to the delight of the same group who accuses him of saying so much that he’s broken the agreed to settlement. The grilling of the man by just about everybody (whose own reputations ought to be examined as to whether they are befitting the various trusted positions they themselves hold in the public eye) is unprecedented. We’re in evil times and the hatred seems to be without human or humane limits.

  35. Even if Cain did what is alleged, and more, I support him and condemn all who have decided his candidacy is a threat to the combine destroying America.

  36. If Cain survives this he has to speak more clearly on the issues. He made another gaff saying China is trying to develop nukes, when it is clear they have had nukes. I will give him the benefit of the doubt and hope he meant China wants to enhance their nuke capabilities. At least he hasn’t said we have 57 states.

  37. Tina | November 2, 2011 at 11:32 pm |
    At least he hasn’t said we have 57 states.
    ***************************
    That’s for sure, and also he would know how to pronounce corpsman, simply because Cain is an American – one of us, whereas, the other is……
    (fill in the blank).
    Have you had a chance to check this link? It has some very interesting stuff which is well researched and thought out.

    http://terribletruth.wordpress.com/2011/11/02/bari%e2%80%b2-barry-barack/

  38. Incredible article, Cabby. Thanks for sharing.

    Here is another one. Different, but interesting. I am not happy Coulter calls the birthers names, but this is good:

    http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=47287

  39. Tina, that is a very good article by Coulter. Isn’t it something the way the Dems use the race card against the Repubs? They are so terribly afraid that a black man could even think of being a candidate for the Rep Party.

    Thanks for sharing. I used to subscribe to Human Events but have sort of lost contact with it only because there is so much political commentary on the net.

  40. Cabby – AZ | November 2, 2011 at 10:40 pm |

    I don’t disagree with you about the arrogance part.

    Cain did not do well undwer questioning.

  41. observer | November 2, 2011 at 10:58 pm | Pat 1789 | November 2, 2011 at 10:27 pm | observer | November 2, 2011 at 9:57 pm |

    Why don’t you get back to us when your boy Rush tard takes up the eligibility of Marco Rubio. LMAO

    ———————————————–
    Can’t stay on topic and take the results from your own illogical rants so deflect instead. BTW, have fun sitting without your A that you LO!!!! Must be painful!!
    ——————————————————————————————–

    My target has not changed. nor is my rant illogiical.
    I think Rush Tard is a closet Lib, and attempting to damage the Republican feild , especially Mitt. And now Cain buy wasting hours everyday making stupid scenarios that do not help Cain.

    If he were for some conservative candidate, I could see. But he is not so the only one that benefits is b-ho. Maybe you should take up some other hobby, like knitting.

  42. illogiical.
    edit
    illogical

  43. Cabby – AZ on November 3, 2011 at 6:00 am said:
    Tina, that is a very good article by Coulter. Isn’t it something the way the Dems use the race card against the Repubs? They are so terribly afraid that a black man could even think of being a candidate for the Rep Party.

    ———

    Yes. Exactly. They forget MLK, Jr., was a Republican and some of biggest racists in the KKK , like Robert Bryd, we’re Democrats.

  44. The Democrat Party is the party of the four S’s: slavery, secession, segregation and now socialism.

  45. Obama said yesterday in defense of his new stimlus bill that “God wants to put people back to work”.

    My question is; How would he know that, and to which God is he talking? The God of the Muslims, or the God of the Christians?

    Before everyone jumps on that…..I know it’s suppose to be the same God.

    But is anyone stupid enough to think Obama has an inside track to GOD? And moreso is anyone stupid enough to think GOD would listen to that pinhead!

    p.s. Hitler also hear voices while he was imprisoned after the 1923 Munich Beer Hall riots…where he supposely wrote ‘Mien Kemp”.

    Could Obama be sending us non believers a message?

  46. pps: Could Bill Ayers have been in Germany during that time?…Only a question.

    ppps: Where was the main stream media on Obama’s communication with GOD? If it had been a Republican who made such a statement, they would have nail him to a cross ( no pun intended)!

    As usual, when it comes to their Massiah, they were asleep at the wheel !

  47. I thought Obama’s glib “yeah, I believe in God too, but….” was typical whenever the reference is known to be to the Christian God and when the reference is to the whole country being traditionally and generally Christian. But whenever he himself can honor some other “god” – with emphasis by him esp. on the Muslim outlook – he makes certain there is some ceremony or other that he personally gets in involved in or personally acknowledges with more gracious statements. It’s pretty obvious….too bad he can’t come out of his own closet on a number of topics!

  48. OBSERVER…..

    can’t or won’t? I vote won’t!

  49. Oh, and just one little acknowledgement to comment intended for moi:
    —————————————————
    Pat 1789 | November 3, 2011 at 7:10 am |
    If he were for some conservative candidate, I could see. But he is not so the only one that benefits is b-ho. Maybe you should take up some other hobby, like knitting.
    —————————————–
    Well since I can only contribute on a pretty limited basis normally I think your hobby reference is sharing your own regular raison d’etre here….which could be a little dangerous since it appears to result in thinking that equates Rush with the liberals as well as Mr. Cain. As the good Lord said … a house divided can have no foundation for standing….and it looks like there is no love lost in the liberal camp for either, so such thinking appears to be rather bizarre. Perhaps another hobby outside of this one could do you good and help your brain clear a bit.

  50. rminnc | November 3, 2011 at 10:04 am | OBSERVER…..

    can’t or won’t? I vote won’t!
    —————————————–
    For the moment he “can’t” since it would obviously show up his entire advertised persona as nothing but a big fat charade to those who aren’t already in the know. He’ll play the “emperor’s new clothes” until a season makes it convenient for somebody to tear him down. In the end, the demonic approach usually eats its own.

  51. Did Obama go to school to study the mannerisms of Malcom X, or were they been inbred in him?

    Has Obama intentionally nutrured the Hawaii Birth Certificate/natural-born thing to distract and through everyone off the real problem with him?

    Is Obama really the son of the radical Islamic wing-nut (Malcom X) who was hell bent on the destruction of America?

    Is this Obama’s real mission in life? The completion of his real father?

    Questions, questions, and more questions….but no answers….YET !

    Go to the “Give Me Liberty” website, they report…. you decide.

  52. “IS MALCOLM X the father of AKA BARACK OBAMA?…from the blogosphere…”

    http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/2011/11/is-malcolm-x-father-of-aka-barack.html

  53. GORDO – Thanks for the link re. Malcolm X. Powerful.
    ************************

    rminnc | November 3, 2011 at 10:26 am |
    Did Obama go to school to study the mannerisms of Malcom X, or were they been inbred in him?
    ************************
    rminnc, I am increasingly believing that Malcolm X IS Obama’s real father.
    There are a number of very intelligent sleuths in this country who have patiently persevered in trying to get to the bottom of this mystery by going back in history, locating pertinent info, and then piecing it all together to form a plausible tapestry of deception and lies. Many have done this independently and most seem to be coming to much the same conclusion.

    If this is all true, then that is possibly the explanation for the silence of Congress and the courts. I believe they are privy to this and have to continually cover up this hoax- the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people, lest there be an uprising that they fear could be disastrous. Can you imagine what the American citizenry would feel if they had an inkling that Obama was really X’s son? Think of all of the lies that Obama has told to create another identity for himself, if this is so!

    Worst thought of all is this: IF this is the deception that has been foisted upon us, then whom do we think they (those complicit in the coverup) would really prefer to have stay in office? Just a wild, unconscionable thought.

  54. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    Here is this article too – Kind of scarey

    The Malcomb X Connection

    http://terribletruth.wordpress.com/2011/10/20/nesting-or-red-rooster-ing-its-memory-lane-for-obama/

  55. observer | November 3, 2011 at 10:19 am |
    You make Zero sense……

  56. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    Malcomb X OR Inelegible
    This could possibly explain the USURPERS arrogance. He knows he has us(the USA) between a rock and a hard place. If anyone is watching his performance in Cannes you can see that his ambition is to be King of the World. He has been winking and smoozing since his arrival there. We are sitting on a powder keg folks.

  57. Yes Cabby….It really is scary isn’t it concerning what is happening to America today.

    But you know, the American people deserve the truth..not another lie upon all the other lies he has already told…

    But, then you have those who say, well if the truth does come out that he is Malcom X’s son, then there will be riots in the streets….duaaah…
    what do we have now? A walk in the sun?

    This hoax committed against this nation must be reviled, and the guilty held accountable if America is ever to regain her posture as the leader of the free world.

    If Obama, or who ever he really is, is never exposed, the only road for America will be a continuing downward spiral till we hit rock bottom.

    What is most frightening to me is that “WE THE PEOPLE” are to blame for permitting this to happen in the first place. It says a lot for the mentality of voting public of today doesn’t it?

    But I have always been a firm believer in the theory that “Justice will Prevail” and “right will win out in the end”….otherwise I would have already given up like many who started out questioning this usurper.

    The only question I have is the same one Job ask of the Lord……..”When Lord, when?”

  58. rminnc | November 3, 2011 at 1:05 pm |
    Yes Cabby….It really is scary isn’t it concerning what is happening to America today.

    But you know, the American people deserve the truth..not another lie upon all the other lies he has already told…
    *********************************
    Oh, I couldn’t agree more! The truth WILL come out someday, but it may then be too late. I’m with you totally when you say “But, then you have those who say, well if the truth does come out that he is Malcom X’s son, then there will be riots in the streets….duaaah…
    what do we have now? A walk in the sun?”

    The alternative (maintaining the coverup) is to invite the total destruction of America, because that is what his intentions are. IF this X factor is true, then it puts an entirely different light on the quest for the real birth certificate. “Who’s your papa?”

    He is laughing his head off over our questioning whether he was born in this country or not, or even whether he is a dual citizen. If Malcolm IS his real father he would meet the NBC requirement probably, BUT he would be guilty of misrepresentation, fraud, and a slew of other criminal offenses.

    I’ve begun to think that his serious zeal and connections with Islam didn’t come just from his time in Indonesia, but rather from his devotion to Malcolm X. That would also explain his tacit support for the Black Panther movement. Things are beginning to be revealed, I believe.

  59. Mr. Bill(ms. helga) | November 3, 2011 at 1:05 pm |
    The USURPER giving US the finger -
    **************************
    Mr. Bill, there is just too much of that to be coincidental! A decent person doesn’t want to think it is true, but I believe it is. It happens too often and at the “appropriate” time.

  60. Remember Gov of Hawaii said BC could not be released because it would create a huge political scandal? That would fit if X was the father.

  61. That is why OB couldn’t kill Gaddafi directly himself. Too much history with X being the father, if true. Explains the letter from Gaddafi saying he loved OB like a son. X makes sense.

  62. If Gaddafi knew the truth about Obie’s parentage… that would be another reason some folks wouldn’t want him around…

  63. Tina, excellent thoughts! I truly believe that some of this stuff is coming together.
    If you saw the videos of X speaking, you can’t help but notice the similarities in the cadence, the chopped-off ends of sentences, the hand gestures, etc. Of course, it could be argued that O studied and has tried to imitate X. But, the looks….. very similar. They say that Obama Sr.’s voice was much deeper, also.

    If this is all true, I bet that conservatives like Hannity, Levin, etc., may all know the story and have been warned to keep it “under raps” for security reasons.

  64. TJ | November 3, 2011 at 2:47 pm |
    If Gaddafi knew the truth about Obie’s parentage… that would be another reason some folks wouldn’t want him around…
    ************************
    That, too, is something to consider. I wonder where Louis Farrakhan fits into the picture. He has spoken out strongly against the killing of Gaddafi by O. LF was born in 1933 and is old enough to know the history. Hmm…..

    “Oh what a tangled web we weave, When first we practise to deceive!”

  65. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    QUICK – Look at Drudgereport NOW – OBAMA PLAY CANNES

    http://www.drudgereport.com/

    Remember what I said a few comments back.

  66. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    BREAKING – SENATE VOTES DOWN INFRASTRUCTURE BILL

  67. It seems that everybody agrees there IS A REAL SERIOUS PROBLEM pressing upon us. Unfortunately not all of us agree how to address it….. some suggest DEMAND Soetoro’s resignation, others seem to advocate wait until 2012 national election (in which Soetoro might not even be allowed to participate as a candidate) by at least one state. Then there are others who simply talk about who they think he really is….BLAH BLAH. Somehow I don’t see sitting about and trying to determine who the person is who is ALREADY illegally occupying the WH,when in reality we should have joined forces a LONG TIME AGO,and acted then to rid ourselves of his presence. As each day passes it becomes more and more difficult to do. Particularly when there is a possibility that he might devise a little action to postpone the general election. He could do that with the help of his complicit Congress,and the SCOTUS. I wouldn’t be surprised if we have already passed the point of NO RETURN, now we either commit to flight,or we crash into a pile of burning debris at the end of the runway. Gweneral Valleley has already taken the first step,now it is up to the rest of us to join in or COWER IN FEAR.

  68. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    Another good article from OBAMA PLAYS CANNES

    http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obama-hugs-erdogan_607704.html

  69. Cabby – AZ | November 3, 2011 at 2:49 pm |
    ————————————
    And remember that the basis for X leaving nation of islam was his supposed disillusionment with elijah muhammad:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elijah_Muhammad#Malcolm_X

    Another source of tension was Malcolm X’s discovery that a Chicago Tribune article claiming that Elijah Muhammad had fathered eight children by six teenaged girls was true.[20] In a meeting with Malcolm X, Muhammad justified his several children and young “wives” as his need to plant his seed in fertile soil.[citation needed]
    snip…. (after leaving NOI) X condemned racism and the conduct of Elijah Muhammad and the Nation of Islam

    Soooo, X would never want it known that he himself, with his reputation for idealistic purity, was playing around….necessity/reason for O’s made up identity story.

    And Calypso Louie was a disciple of Elijah Muhammad/NOI.

  70. Pat 1789 | November 3, 2011 at 12:40 pm | observer | November 3, 2011 at 10:19 am |
    You make Zero sense……

    ———————————————
    Coming from your confused mind that’s a compliment!

  71. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    What must be going through the minds of the G20 members –
    What if these stories of HIM not being eligible are true – Then nothing he signs here is legitimate!

  72. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    As the USURPER tries to over ride the Congress with Executive orders then it will be necessary to have to question his legitimacy. Riots or no riots.
    Wake-up America

  73. When a KNOWN enemy is coming over the hill and approaching your line of defense you DO NOT WAIT TO SEE WHO THE FATHER WAS OF ANY OF THE ENEMY. That is on a par with READING THE ENEMY HABEAS CORPUS RIGHTS.( THE REFEREE BLOWS A WHISTLE AND DECLARES” TIME OUT”) while the enemy is read his rights. NEAT HUH? All while in the middle of the battlefield.LOL……..YOU ACT TO REPEL,and otherwise to DESTROY the attacking forces IMMEDIATELY. HESITATION to react causes only one thing……….YOUR DEATH.

  74. Just went to Gordo’s link…..seems to use same reason I’ve always thought about why Obama had to phony up a new identity so to not blemish the reputation of X since his basis for leaving NOI was the impurity of EM. Thanks Gordo. You give us a lot of good links.

  75. What confuses me about someone else being Obummer’s dad is why would there be a picture of Jr. and Sr. together at the airport when Jr. was about 10? There also is a picture of them at Christmas time at the house.

    There does seem to be a lot of things that make it seem like X could be his dad, but the pictures are the only piece that doesn’t “fit”.

  76. I think that any military personell would agree that he who hesitates to react DOESN’T LAUGH LAST……..HE LAUGHS HIS LAST. That is why distraction from duty becomes the arbiter of your death.

  77. Julie T,

    Part of the ruse….only connection with Sr. was a grabbed photo at an airport opportunity…one picture has obviously spoken a thousand words to a lot of people who wouldn’t question the story….and pictures with that side of family….there is that connection of that family to X.

    But what do you do with the grandmother saying she was there when he was born….what was previously told her to say for X’s purpose?…and later the necessity for change for the additional NBC wrench thrown into the mix?

  78. BYE BYE ALL Time to slither back under my rock!

  79. I see fake birth certificate nutter’s ( obots ) have moved on to a new conspiracy.
    Malcolm X father of b-ho etc,,,,,

    Wow just amazing !

  80. Pat, If Mario hadn’t posted this theory on his blog I would tend to agree with you. Given the fact that he did, along with Sheriff Joe’s foreshadowing of a shocking revelation, I’m in “wait and see” mode (I guess as always on this issue). The bottom line is that something is rotten. There is no doubt about that.

  81. Cabby…you comments are well taken….thanks

  82. Pat…I’m neither a birth certificate nutter (your words), or a damn obat, (again your words).

    I’m just an old man who has given a lot of hard earned years serving this country and hate like hell to see it destroyed from within.

    Do you have a better explaination for Mr. Obama’s refusal to release any of his records proving he was even born? (fake bc not accepted). If so, we would like to hear them.

    If not, be thankful someone is questioning and keeping the issues which are most important to this nation at this time as top priority

  83. Pat 1789 | November 3, 2011 at 4:11 pm | I see fake birth certificate nutter’s ( obots ) have moved on to a new conspiracy.
    Malcolm X father of b-ho etc,,,,,

    ——————————————–
    Where have you been? That theory has been out there among the many others for a looooong time. If nothing else, the purported Sr. paternity is a hoot….all you have to do is check out the physical comparisons.

  84. So typical…..Pajamas is running with the latest “allegedly” story now with several changes to it and yet, after I linked to some of the real person accusations against Obama, pointing out that these stories never get same coverage or attention and they already have a basis in fact : Larry Sinclair video: http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/11/un-anonymous-source-says-he-gave-obama.html
    and the e-verify non-match of Obama and his SSN link, I got “your comment is awaiting approval” followed by its removal. And this from a supposed “conservative” blog! They won’t touch Obama real stories with a ten foot pole….anywhere.

  85. Julie T | November 3, 2011 at 3:55 pm |
    There does seem to be a lot of things that make it seem like X could be his dad, but the pictures are the only piece that doesn’t “fit”.
    *********************************
    Julie T, over the past months a number of experts, like Dr. Ron Polland, have done a lot of work revealing how many, many of the pictures out there have been photoshopped to give the desired result. In other words, there is clear evidence that an identity has been created for Obama from day one to fit the narrative he has given.

  86. Pingback: Does Upholding the U.S. Constitution Constitute a Security Threat?| The Post & Email

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s