Ron Paul on Barney Frank panel for defense cuts, George Soros ties, Sustainable Defense Task Force, Institute for Policy Studies paper, Obama rule through executive orders

Ron Paul on Barney Frank panel for defense cuts, George Soros ties, Sustainable Defense Task Force, Institute for Policy Studies paper, Obama rule through executive orders

(Highlighting by Citizen Wells)

From FrontPageMag.com January 2, 2012.

“Ron Paul’s Soros Defense Plan”

“It was recently observed that Ron Paul was to the left of Obama on national security and the best evidence for that statement can be found when one year ago Ron Paul joined forces with Barney Frank on a proposal to gut national defense via a panel of experts, quite a few of whom were tied to George Soros.

In July 2010, Barney Frank and Ron Paul co-authored a Huffington Post article rolling out their Sustainable Defense Task Force. The Task Force “consisting of experts on military expenditures that span the ideological spectrum” would recommend a trillion dollars in defense cuts. The experts, however, didn’t quite “span the ideological spectrum” — more like float under it.

The panel of experts who would decide how to best gut national defense featured such independent thinkers as William D. Hartung of the New America Foundation. Hartung’s main expertise was appearing in “Hijacking Catastrophe: 9/11, Fear & the Selling of American Empire.”

Then there was Lawrence J. Kolb of the Center for American Progress and Miriam Pemberton of the Institute for Policy Studies. If you want to know what the Center, the Foundation and the Institute all have in common, it’s Hungarian and smells like stale cabbage and the death of nations.

The rather creepy Institute for Policy Studies issued a paper proposing that Obama act as king and rule through executive orders. The New American Foundation is not only backed by Soros but has his son on its leadership council. The Center for American Progress is run by the co-chair of Obama’s transition team and is, for all intents and purposes, the think tank of the White House. All three are Soros funded.”
“But why would Ron Paul allow George Soros that much power and influence over America’s defense policy? There are a number of possibilities. There is the possibility that Ron Paul just didn’t know and didn’t bother to do his research. Which is not much of a recommendation for the job he’s running for. There’s another possibility that Ron Paul knew and didn’t care, that he had no objection to being part of a left-right alliance against the “American Empire” with Soros. But there’s also a third possibility.

During the previous election, Americans Against Escalation in Iraq (AAEI) ran an ad praising Ron Paul for his position against the war. AAEI was an umbrella group for MoveOn.org, the Center for American Progress, SEIU, Americans United For Change, the National Security Network and others in the progressive bestiary. A number of those beasties were Soros groups.

I’m not one to dabble in conspiracy theories, but when Soros pays for an ad praising you during the Republican primaries and then you put his experts in charge of America’s defense policy, then maybe some questions should be asked.”

Read more:

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/01/02/ron-pauls-soros-defense-plan/

From The Hill July 11, 2010.

“Panel commissioned by Barney Frank recommends nearly $1T in defense cuts”

“A panel commissioned by Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) is recommending nearly $1 trillion in cuts to the Pentagon’s budget during the next 10 years.

The Sustainable Defense Task Force, a commission of scholars from a broad ideological spectrum appointed by Frank, the House Financial Services Committee chairman, laid out actions the government could take that could save as much as $960 billion between 2011 and 2020.

Measures presented by the task force include making significant reductions to the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program, which has strong support from Defense Secretary Robert Gates; delaying the procurement of a new midair refueling tanker the Air Force has identified as one of its top acquisition priorities; and reducing the Navy’s fleet to 230 ships instead of the 313 eyed by the service.
Shipbuilding has strong support in the congressional defense committees, which write the Pentagon bills. Efforts to reduce the number of ships would run into resistance from the Pentagon and the shipbuilding lobby.

Frank on Friday warned that if he can’t convince Congress to act in the “general direction” of the task force recommendation, “then every other issue will suffer.” Not cutting the Pentagon’s budget could lead to higher taxes and spending cuts detrimental to the environment, housing and highway construction.

The acceptance of the recommendations would depend on a “philosophical change” and a “redefinition of the strategy,” Frank said at press conference on Capitol Hill.

He said the creation of the deficit reduction commission offers the best opportunity for the reduction recommendations. Frank wants to convince his colleagues to write to the deficit reduction commission and warn that they would not approve any of the plans suggested by the commission unless reduction of military spending is included.

The task force has looked at various options to trim the Pentagon’s budget in order to reduce the deficit. Those include a reduction in Army and Marine Corps end-strength by cutting back on personnel stationed in Europe and Asia; and rolling back Army and Marine Corps personnel as the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan end.

The panel also looked into reforming military compensation, which could save about $55 billion; saving $60 billion by reforming the military healthcare system; and reducing recruiting expenditures once the wars wind down to preserve about $5 billion.

All of these recommendations would be expected to engender congressional opposition.

The task force also suggested canceling the V-22 Osprey program and the Marine Corps’s troubled Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle.

The U.S. nuclear arsenal would also be on the chopping block, under the panel’s suggestions.

The task force recommends reducing the U.S. nuclear warhead total to 1,050.

Launchers would include 160 Minuteman missiles and seven Ohio-class submarines with 24 missiles (each with five warheads).

The panel also recommends retiring the Air Force bombers — “the bomber leg of the nuclear triad,” which includes land-based missiles and nuclear submarines — and ending work on the Trident II missile.

Frank acknowledged Friday that making cuts to the military’s healthcare system, known as Tricare, would be a “non-starter” with his congressional colleagues. But he said that suggestions on how to handle the nuclear arsenal and missile defense could get a “great deal” of support on the Hill.

Frank requested the creation of the task force in cooperation with Reps. Walter Jones (R-N.C.) and Ron Paul (R-Texas) and Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.).

The Project on Defense Alternatives coordinated the work of the task force, which included the following members: Carl Conetta, Project on Defense Alternatives; Benjamin Friedman, Cato Institute; William Hartung, New America Foundation; Christopher Hellman, National Priorities Project; Heather Hurlburt, National Security Network; Charles Knight, Project on Defense Alternatives; Lawrence J. Korb, Center for American Progress; Paul Kawika Martin, Peace Action; Laicie Olson, Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation; Miriam Pemberton, Institute for Policy Studies; Laura Peterson, Taxpayers for Common Sense; Prasannan Parthasarathi, Boston College; Christopher Preble, Cato Institute, and Winslow Wheeler, Center for Defense Information.”

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/102677-panel-commissioned-by-barney-frank-recommends-nearly-1t-in-defense-cuts-to-close-deficit

From WND, World Net Daily, November 8, 2010.

“SOROS GROUP WANTS OBAMA TO RULE BY EXECUTIVE ORDER”

“It was progressives who won the mid-term elections, particularly incumbents in a socialist-founded congressional caucus that emerged from last week’s ballots virtually unscathed, boasted an article published by the George Soros-funded Institute for Policy Studies, a Marxist-oriented think-tank in Washington, D.C.

The article recommends that President Obama govern from executive order to push through a progressive agenda.
“Progressives won in the 2010 mid-term elections,” wrote Karen Dolan, a fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies, or IPS, and director of the Cities for Progress and Cities for Peace projects based at the radical organization.

“The Congressional Progressive Caucus, the largest caucus in the House Democratic Caucus at over 80 members, emerged virtually unscathed, losing only three members,” she wrote, in the piece published on the IPS website.

“By contrast, the conservative Blue Dog Democratic caucus was more than sliced in half from 54 members to only 26. Further, of the 34 conservative Dems who voted against Obama’s Healthcare Reform, a mere 12 won re-election,” she wrote.

Dolan declared that “our work is now finally beginning.”

“The veil of a happy Democratic governing majority is finally lifted. We didn’t have it then; We don’t have it now. But what we do have now is a more solidly progressive bunch of Dems in Congress and a president presumably less encumbered by the false illusion that playing nice will get him a date with the other team.”

She went on to recommend that progressives “throw our support unabashedly behind the Congressional Progressive Caucus, and let’s push Obama to finally do the right thing through as many Executive Orders as we can present to him.””

http://www.wnd.com/2010/11/225829/

 

About these ads

89 responses to “Ron Paul on Barney Frank panel for defense cuts, George Soros ties, Sustainable Defense Task Force, Institute for Policy Studies paper, Obama rule through executive orders

  1. citizenwells

    Good morning Zach, et al.

  2. citizenwells

    From Bessie:

    Submitted on 2012/01/09 at 7:13 am

    “Good Morning All; I don’t know when exactly Obama hired Robert Baur, but I do know that it was Baur that accompanied Obama to the meeting with the 4 federal agents when summoned by Patrick Fitzgerald. He needed him pretty early on, it was December 18th of 2008 when Obama turned over his “internal investigation” written by Craig Greg to the feds, Baur at his side. Is there any way that 4 federal agents investigating the sale of the Senate seat neglected to ask Obama about his participation when they already knew about his contact with Balanoff. The feds had to wonder WHY Obama left it out of his report, they had to ask…”

    Bessie, Bauer was on the staff of Perkins Coie prior to being on the White House staff in 2009.

    http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/YE/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.html

    HOME / CAMPAIGN FINANCE REPORTS AND DATA / PRESIDENTIAL REPORTS / 2007 YEAR-END

    OBAMA FOR AMERICA

    PO Box 8102
    Chicago, Illinois 60680
    FEC Committee ID #: C00431445

    This report contains activity for a Primary Election

    Report type: Year-End

    This Report is an Amendment

    Filed 08/30/2008

    Perkins Coie 111,972.76

  3. Leo Donofrio has put up a thorough analysis of key points in the judicial history of the ‘natural born citizen’ issue. The article is very long and requires careful attention but it is well worth it. The post is broken into 3 parts (see below). The excerpts below are provided to give the flavor of the article; but it is necessary to read the entire article to appreciate Mr. Donofrio’s efforts in educating the public regarding this issue.

    The McCreery v. Somerville Funeral – Maskell And Gray To Attend – Minor v. Happersett To Preside.

    Part 1: JUSTICE GRAY MISQUOTED McCREERY V. SOMERVILLE AND THE RELEVANT STATUTE.
    Grab a cup of java, put your thinking caps on, kick back and relax. We are going to be here for a while. Focus. Below, you will be privy to a true and proper revision of United States Supreme Court history.
    One of the foundational building blocks for Justice Gray’s opinion in U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark is the case, McCreery v. Somerville, 22 US 354 (1824), to which Gray made a fatally flawed assumption based upon his failure to acknowledge a judicially recognized misquote. Then, Justice Gray compounded his initial error by creating a separately deceptive quotation.
    These errors completely sully his analysis of McCreery. Gray failed to inform his opinion in Wong Kim Ark with the fact that the U.S Supreme Court had questioned that opinion in 1881, just prior to Gray having joined the Court.
    In Sullivan v.Burnett, 105 U.S. 334 (1881), the Court stated:
    “This view is controverted by the plaintiffs on the authority of McCreery’s Lessee v. Somerville, 9 Wheat. 354, where this Court had occasion to determine the meaning of the statute of 11 & 12 William III. c. 6,…We remark in reference to that case that the English statute is not accurately quoted in the opinion of the Court, as an examination of 10 British Stat. at Large 319 (Pickering’s Ed.) will show. but without deciding that the words omitted ought to have produced a judgment different from that rendered, we are of opinion that the present case is not governed by McCreery’s Lessee v. Somerville.” Sullivan v. Burnett, 105 U.S. 334, 340-341. (Emphasis added.)
    The misquote would not have changed the outcome in McCreery since the issue of the plaintiff’s citizenship status made no difference to the case, where the plaintiff could not inherit from a living ancestor. In Sullivan v. Burnett, the Missouri statute did allow for inheritance through a living ancestor, so McCreery was not controlling. However, the misquote completely nullifies Justice Gray’s assumption in Wong Kim Ark. …

    … These anomalies include straight forward mistakes, unfounded assumptions, misquotes and subtle acts of misdirection. Nothing can be taken at face value. Considering that Gray was indirectly determining the citizenship status of President Chester Arthur (who appointed him), the appearance of impartiality has been severely compromised. In the days ahead, I will present all of the problems now associated with Gray’s opinion in great detail. Today, we begin with McCreery v. Somerville….

    ….Part 2: JACK MASKELL’S CRS MEMO CONTAINS BLATANTLY FRAUDULENT ANALYSIS OF McCREERY v. SOMERVILLE.
    Jack Maskell’s latest Congressional “research” memo on POTUS eligibility failed to unearth the McCreery misquote as repeated in Wong Kim Ark. Unfortunately, the memo takes inspiration from Justice Gray’s cavalier quotation operation by going one step further in concocting authorities out of thin air which do not exist anywhere other than the mind of its author, who has committed the cardinal sin of legal memo writing by advocating rather than educating.
    The first thing one learns at law school in Legal Research and Writing 101 are the rules pertaining to the composition of a memorandum of law. This is a document usually requested by a partner from an associate. A common situation occurs when the partner is heading to court for an argument, and with limited time available he assigns the task of research to a subordinate. The associate is required to write an objective memo advising the partner of the best possible arguments for both sides.
    If the associate then offers to the partner a one-sided memo which slants the law in favor of their client, and the partner is thereafter surprised in court by opposing counsel with authorities and arguendo which were not included in the memo, said partner will be offering said associate free limo service to the unemployment line.
    Maskell’s “memo” is a complete failure as a legal memo. It presents only that which advocates for eligibility whilst steadfastly avoiding that which does not. And the evidence presented is intentionally misleading.
    In a previous report, I highlighted Maskell’s incredibly deceptive practice of Frankensteining quotes out of thin air then attributing them to the US Supreme Court even though the Court said no such thing….

    ….Part 3: MINOR v. HAPPERSETT PROVIDES THE EULOGY.
    If a blockbuster quote such as is alleged in Maskell’s Footnote 61 really did exist from the US Supreme Court, there would be no need for a 53 page “memo” on the topic. Such a quote would slam dunk the controversy. But no U.S. Supreme Court opinion has ever held that a person born in the country of alien parentage is eligible to be President. That has never happened.
    In fact, the only time the US Supreme Court ever did define the class of persons who were POTUS eligible under Article 2 Section 1 was in Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874), wherein it was held:
    “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.” Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 168.
    There’s a quote for you. It really exists. And it tells you exactly who are natural-born citizens; those born in the country of parents who are citizens. ….

  4. citizenwells

    Thanks Zach.

  5. Something interesting from the AP.

    There is an article by the AP circulating in today’s news pertaining to the American former U.S. Marine, Amir Mirzaei Hekmati who has been tried and convicted to death in Iran accused of spying for the CIA. The generality of the news is not what surprised, rather it was their ability to briefly understand citizenship issues in this matter! Something they have always denied with Obama or at least his supporters.

    For example, the AP states in part; “The 28-year-old former military translator was born in Arizona and graduated from high school in Michigan. His family is of Iranian origin. His father, a professor at a community college in Flint, Michigan..” and.. “Hekmati is a dual U.S.-Iranian national. Iran considers him an Iranian since the country’s law does not recognize dual citizenship…”

    What happened to the “if born on U.S. Soil only” then a natural born citizen theory from the media and Obot supporters here? It just got thrown out the window, that’s what just happened!

    I will assume with minimal risk here, that when he was born in Arizona, his father (an Iranian) was not a naturalized U.S. Citizen at the time of his birth, thus creating a duel citizenship from Birth even though born on U.S. Soil.

    Secondly, the AP apparently understands that “some” Countries such as Iran (and at one time Indonesia) do not recognize duel allegiances.

    Last and briefly, I am also confident that this information given to the AP for their report came from the U.S. State Dept. that fully recognizes the duel allegiance nationality citizenship problems this young man is facing.

    Simply amazing…

    http://news.yahoo.com/iran-sentences-american-man-death-cia-case-082241130.html

  6. citizenwells

    Thanks William.

  7. I’m still decompressing from the Bronco’s win yesterday over the Steelers. It may take me a few days to come down from my cloud. WOW! Good morning everyone. Denver and Colorado are very happy this morning.

  8. Good can defeat evil in the face of astronomical odds I guess is the lesson that we need to take away from yesterday’s victory. Football as a metaphor for life..

  9. January 9, 2012
    The Top 5 Reasons Obama Must Be Removed as Commander-in-Chief
    By Stella Paul

    Obama recently signed a mysterious new law that proclaims all American soil is a “battleground,” thereby allowing the president to indefinitely detain any American citizen without charges. Critics fear Obama will use his fun new unconstitutional powers to make his political enemies disappear, but that may not be necessary.

    The way things are going, most patriotic Americans will soon be six feet under, felled by apoplectic strokes brought on by reading the latest outrage committed by our “Commander in Chief.” He may not have a limit to what he’ll inflict; but our collective blood pressure may have a limit to what we can bear.

    With each passing hour, the question becomes not if America can survive a second term, but whether we can survive another day. It’s not just the $15 trillion in debt, the Muslim Brotherhood in the catbird seat, and our bleeding open border. It’s the never-ending deliberate assaults against our safety and security laughingly committed by the cold-eyed man with the nuclear code.

    Here are the top 5 reasons Obama must be removed as Commander-in-Chief. Please read them while seated.

    Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/01/the_top_5_reasons_obama_must_be_removed_as_commander-in-chief.html#ixzz1iyTpYYPr

  10. Bob Strauss………………….
    Everybody who has any insight at all are now writing about what is going on in the WH,and how infuriated they are about it. Yet not ONE person has taken the iniative to ALLY Americans, so that the entire country can act without fear of reprisal. There absolutely MUST be a BONDING,and subsequent ALLIANCE of all Americans against what is happening. If people would do this the entire criminalised Federal Government could be brought down in less than 15 minutes. This would include ALL of the criminal JUDGES as well. It all starts with UNIFICATION of PURPOSE. We might not like somebody personally but if he is a patriot then he is an ALLY. We need to set aside PETTY dislikes and unify. If Americans feel that they are TOO GOOD for that thenthe DO GOODERS will be the ones who get to pay the fiddler after the fact.

  11. CW:
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28349407/ns/politics-white_house/t/blagojevich-investigators-met-obama/

    Obama delayed releasing his report until U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald’s staff had completed the interviews with Obama and his two top aides, incoming White House attorney Greg Craig said in the review he wrote for Obama.

    Obama, who was accompanied by lawyer Robert Bauer in the interview, had no contact with the governor or his aides, the report states. Prosecutors have said Obama is not implicated in the case.

    “We are satisfied there was nothing inappropriate that took place here, either in terms of conversations or communications or contacts, between transition officials and the governor’s office,” Craig said after releasing the report. “

  12. Bob Strauss……………….
    Today there is a class of “SO CALLED” Americans who think that they are SOOOO IMPOOORRTANT that nobody would ever dare to do anything to them. When the enemy sends one of his airmail rocket propelled messages to America how important anybody is will not mean a tinker’s damn. Nor will it’s direction change because somebody who fancies themselves as ALL IMPORTANT. They along with their 20,000 sq, foot palaces, their BIG SUVs, their GATED entrances,and all of their FILLET MIGNON meat, their fancy wine, ETC, ……..all will evaporate in a split second. Suddenly they will discover just how damn UNIMPORTANT they are. This is reflective of our so called YUPPIE crowd. There isn’t very much bullsh#t being spread that isn’t traceable to this crowd. They all live in their own little MENTAL,and PHYSICAL UTOPIAS. Case in point HOLLYWOOD USA. AKA FANTASYLAND.

  13. Obama did not have contact with the “governor or his aides” he had contact with Tom Balanoff of the SEIU, AND the feds knew it before they interviewed him…Could the 4 vetran federal agents who interviewed Obama for over 2 hours about the selling of the Senate seat, NOT have asked him about Balanoff??? When they already knew…Wyma was reporting back to them and he had spoken with Emanuel…

  14. Although Obama “delayed releasing his report” to the public, he DID turn over a copy to the federal agents BEFORE the interview took place…The federal agents in charge of the investigation gave it back to him, telling him to hang onto it until after thier investigation was complete…Obama GAVE IT TO them anyway! This is the same report he turned over to the public/press where there is NO MENTION of his communication with Balanoff.

  15. The ex speaker of the house is among the SOOO IMPOOORTANT people. Remember the ex speaker,puts HIS/HER shoes on each morning the same way everyone else ON EARTH does. That is everyone except those who don’t wear any shoes at all. The ex speaker thinks that as the speaker entitles that person to have a Boeing 767 for their own personal airborne taxicab to hual them and their relatives back and forth across the country, several times a week at taxpayer’s expense. What is wrong with them using PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION,and at THEIR OWN EXPENSE? What is wrong with using an executive size aircraft fitted with extra fuel capacity. Oh thats right I nearly forgot, the speaker is TOOOO IMPOOOOORTANT for all that.

  16. http://www.emptywheel.net/2008/12/23/blagojevich-report-timeline/

    Check out the December 15th entry… Obama gave them the report.

    IF Obama was telling the truth THEN Balanoff was lying and Blagojevich should get a mistrial…

  17. RMinNC,

    A couple of days ago, you asked a very valid question pertaining to GA court issued subpoena deriving from Judge Michael Malihi pertaining to Dr. Orly Taitz cases. At that time, I briefly explained my understanding from a legal analysis in which I reviewed from the internet that one State Court does not have a controlling interest over another State…..

    Apparently, there is good news. That Legal analysis from an unknown legal internet source, is highly incorrect and failed to mention known Constitutional clauses.

    Constitutional Attorney Van Irion whom is involved in the GA Ballot case, has stated in an Interview with the PostandEmail this statement.

    Question from the Editor to Constitutional Attorney Van Irion: “I was told that the Deputy Attorney General, Jill Nagamine, has said that Hawaii doesn’t have to answer a subpoena from another state.”

    Constitutional Attorney Var Irion response: “Oh, that’s hilarious. That violates the Constitution of the United States and is akin to seceding from the nation. If the state of Hawaii does that, the judge has the right to jail them. The way that works is that he writes a contempt order and sends it to the law enforcement of the state of Hawaii, and if they fail, then they’re violating the Constitution and we need to get the federal court in Hawaii involved. The Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution states “must honor the judgments from courts duly constituted in other states.” They don’t have a choice, and law enforcement must follow the orders of courts from other states. If they don’t, they’re violating their oath. That’s where we’re at now! ”

    Apparently Dr. Orly does have a recourse of action. The good news.

    Hope this helps. It certainly brightened my day.

    http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/07/atty-van-irion-discusses-georgia-ballot-challenge-and-the-constitution/

  18. Bessie, remember this “meeting”?

  19. I remember the picture but I don’t remember what the meeting was about??? They both look pretty intense.

  20. MUST READ ARTICLES!!

    “OBAMA’S FASCIST AMERICA IN 10 EASY STEPS”

    Timothy Birdnow
    http://www.AmericanThinker.com
    January 9, 2012

    See The Entire Article Here:
    http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/01/obamas_fascist_america_in_10_easy_steps.html#ixzz1iz29Ouu3

    * * * *

    “THE TOP 5 REASONS OBAMA MUST BE REMOVED AS COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF”

    By Stella Paul
    AmericanThinker.com
    January 9, 2012

    See The Entire Article Here:
    http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/01/the_top_5_reasons_obama_must_be_removed_as_commander-in-chief.html#ixzz1iyTpYYPr

    * * * *

    “SURPRISE! HALF A MILLION UNION WORKERS GET OBAMACARE WAIVER SINCE JUNE”

    Rick Moran
    AmericanThinker.com
    January 8, 2012

    See The Article Here:
    http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/01/surprise_half_a_million_union_workers_get_obamacare_waiver_since_june.html

  21. Yow!!
    bob strauss | January 9, 2012 at 10:18 am | and
    William | January 9, 2012 at 11:45 am |

    Thank you for posting this information!!!

  22. Three Comments From:

    http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/08/final-implementation-of-obama-dictatorship-in-progress-on-all-levels/#comments

    mustangman says:
    Monday, January 9, 2012 at 7:24 AM

    Obama will either create a 3rd party or start a war (declared) and declare martial law thus voiding any presidential election in Nov. Take tour pick. We’ve waited too long.
    __________

    thelittlebrother says:
    Sunday, January 8, 2012 at 6:14 PM

    “If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.” –2 Chronicles 7:14

    FOR THOSE WHO ARE INTERESTED:

    “Join us for 40 DAYS OF PRAYER AND FASTING (Imploring God’s Mercy on the U.S and the world)

    From January 8 ( Feast of the Epiphany – February 16, 2012)

    THIS IS AN URGENT CALL TO PRAYAND TO FAST! PRAY AND FAST NOW!!!”

    http://40daysofprayerandfasting.org/
    __________

    John Sutherland says:
    Sunday, January 8, 2012 at 12:42 PM

    Sher is right. There isn’t anything redeeming about this federal government anymore. It is completely lawless and simply needs to be shut down by the state governments.

    * * * *

  23. citizenwells

    Bessie, et al:

    December 9, 2008

    ABC News has an article and video that catches Obama lying again regarding
    his contact with Rod Blagojevich:

    http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/12/09/barack-obama-talked-to-rod-blagojevich-more-obama-lies-david-axelrod-statement-abc-news-december-9-2008-obama-blagojevich-ties-to-chicago-and-il-corruption-obama-senate-replacement-obama-indic/

    December 10, 2008

    Today more evidence has surfaced of contact between Barack Obama and Rod Blagojevich:

    http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/12/10/barack-obama-talked-to-rod-blagojevich-more-obama-lies-obama-blagojevich-meeting-november-5-2008-discuss-us-senate-replacement-obama-camp-lies-ties-to-tony-rezko-fbi-mole-john-thomas-links-them/

    June 25, 2010

    Remember the controversial meeting between Obama and Blagojevich on November 5, 2008, one day after Obama stole the general election?

    From KHQA TV.

    “Ill. governor meeting with Obama today

    By Carol Sowers
    Wednesday, November 05, 2008 at 10:39 a.m.
    CHICAGO, ILL. — Now that Barack Obama will be moving to the White House, his seat in the U.S. Senate representing Illinois will have to be filled.

    That’s one of Obama’s first priorities today.

    He’s meeting with Governor Rod Blagojevich this afternoon in Chicago to discuss it.

    http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2010/06/25/obama-met-with-blagojevich-on-november-5-2008-smoking-gun-obama-lies-axelrod-lies-blagojevich-wiretap-khqa-tv-article-khqa-retraction-obama-denial-axelrod-denial/

  24. citizenwells

  25. Starla | January 9, 2012 at 12:42 pm |

    Yow!!
    bob strauss | January 9, 2012 at 10:18 am | and
    William | January 9, 2012 at 11:45 am |
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Maybe this is the reason why the Hawaiian Judge intentional scheduled Dr. Orly to appear in Hawaii during her known scheduled date to appear in GA?

    An intentional Conflict of legal schedule’s created by Hawaii. This is about to get interesting……

  26. OldSalt79,

    Obama’s chief of staff Bill Daily resigned, being reported on Rush Limbaugh.

    Could this be the beginning of the end?

  27. Valerie Jarrett wins another internal battle, having beat back Emanuel and Rouse. Her relationship with Michelle is paramount. The Usurper is uncomfortable with coaching by men; he merely wants them to service him, as they did at Men’s Country in Chicago. The new guy from budget is a place filler and order taker. They never issued a budget and will not do so now; he had nothing to do.

  28. Thanks CW: Now that I read that I do remember David Axelrod saying that and then back-peddeling…So, if Blagojevich met with Obama on November 5, John Wyma was already acting as an informant since October ….He had to act fast putting in Eric Holder!!! Can you even imagine the discussions Fitzgerald has had with his new boss???

  29. bob strauss | January 9, 2012 at 2:52 pm |

    OldSalt79,

    Obama’s chief of staff Bill Daily resigned, being reported on Rush Limbaugh.
    Could this be the beginning of the end?

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Bob,

    I believe you are correct. This could very well be the beginning of the end. There are far too many issues addressing Obama from all fronts. Certainly this is becoming overwhelming for them to continue the same path. General George Patton and General Douglass MacArthur would certainly be proud of the American flanking maneuvers to expose the enemy such as the known Socialist/Communist Obama and Staff.

    A very proud Temporary Victory for America. Let’s drive forward to expose them all….

    Just saying,

  30. scgo | January 9, 2012 at 3:14 pm |
    Hahahahahaha !!!

    “McCain endorses Obama….again”
    http://seeingredaz.wordpress.com/2012/01/09/mccain-endorses-obama-again/
    ******************
    What a first-class blunder!! (Or was it? Hmm……)

  31. Pat1789; do you think it has anything to do with the new wars abrewen in Chicago???
    http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/01/chicago_political_turf_war_heats_up.html

  32. William | January 9, 2012 at 3:33 pm |
    bob strauss | January 9, 2012 at 2:52 pm |

    OldSalt79,

    Obama’s chief of staff Bill Daily resigned, being reported on Rush Limbaugh.
    Could this be the beginning of the end?
    ************************
    Agree with your assessment, BUT, actually the rumor of this happening has been around for quite some time. I don’t have a link……it may have been through the Insider Report. I hope that they “all” flee like rats from a sinking ship.

  33. Latest news in support of WH Insider???

    Bill Daley OUT – Time for a look back at what Insider told us way back when…
    http://theulstermanreport.com/2012/01/09/bill-daley-out-time-for-a-look-back-at-what-insider-told-us-way-back-when/

    The Valerie Jarrett and Michelle Obama Presidency…
    http://theulstermanreport.com/2012/01/09/the-valerie-jarrett-and-michelle-obama-presidency/

    Couldn’t you just see Daley cringing as Obama “explained” that it was really Daley’s idea while Obama pleaded with him to stay but, alas, Daley insisted …… (substitute Jarrett)

  34. Cabby – AZ | January 9, 2012 at 3:35 pm |

    What a first-class blunder!! (Or was it? Hmm……)
    ———————————————————————————

    McShame has been hypnotized by BO since early 2008 and/or he was just a shill candidate disguised as a RINO on the ticket in 2008.

    I wrote a letter to his reelection website in 2010 asking him what he thought the definition of a NBC was, after he had scrutinized his opponent JD Hayworth as being a “birther” …and all he could reply was reciting Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution and this was after he was memorialized with a definition of NBC by BO and the rest of Congress in their somewhat all election influencing unlawful defiance of the Separation of Powers Doctrine providing a non-binding 511 Resolution as only SCOTUS can lawfully explain and interpret the laws of our nation.

    http://www.congressforkids.net/Judicialbranch_supremecourt.htm

  35. Charlie Gasparino on Cavuto just said that Daley didn’t like all the power given to Jarrett….also was a moderate when it came to business which obviously the Obama adviser crowd (Jarrett and the wife) don’t like….want more extreme moves against business and all our traditions…which is and has been obvious. Insider saw the women power in there…held over the little man!

  36. Citizenwells,
    The resignation of Daley is a signal to the Democratic Party that Obama isn’t re-electable. Read the old White House Insider predictions.

    http://theulstermanreport.com/

    The ‘insider’ is now very credible, he predicted this and said it would be a signal to democratic apparatus to abandon the ‘mistake’ that is Obama.

    Pete

  37. Huh?!

    Alabama Judge Dismisses Al Hendershot’s Obama Ballot Challenge Lawsuit Because He’s White: Two More Injunctions Filed

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/alabama-judge-dismisses-al-hendershots.html

  38. Romney’s missing twin?

    http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0905741/

    Every time I see Romney on stage I think of him!!!!

  39. “A DEFENSE OF RON PAUL AND POLITICAL BOLDNESS”

    By Andrew Foy, M.D. & Brenton Stransky
    January 9, 2012

    Excerpt:

    “The same could not be said of a President Paul because he has clearly laid out his plan and made his intentions known. Electing Paul would represent a clear mandate from the electorate to reduce the size and scope of government. Any other candidate running, without a clear plan, could not claim a similar mandate, which would mean at least 4 more years of business as usual — enter every other Republican presidential candidate.

    On announcement of Paul’s plan, Rush Limbaugh proclaimed:

    Ron Paul is about to show the Republican presidential field what a serious fiscal reform plan looks like. He is going to propose $1 trillion in real spending cuts. He is going to propose immediately freezing spending by numerous government agencies back to 2006 levels…Beyond that the EPA would see a 30% cut. The FDA would see a 40% cut. Foreign aid would be zeroed out immediately. And he would take an ax to Pentagon funding for wars. Medicaid, food stamps, family support programs, children’s nutrition programs would all be block-granted to the states and be removed from the mandatory spending column of the federal budget. Some functions of the eliminated departments, such as Pell grants, would be continued elsewhere in the federal bureaucracy. The federal workforce would be reduced by 10%[.]

    What this indicates is something, folks, that we have got to face, if we are serious about this. Fooling around the margins isn’t going to get it done. A 2% tax cut here, or a 3% tax variation over there is not going to fix what’s wrong. Genuine, big spending cuts are the only thing that is going to bring us back[.]

    We agree with Rush on this. America is in dire straits, and this is one reason why we enthusiastically support Ron Paul.

    Next, Yoshida asks, “What do you suppose the near-term economic results of such a transition would be, and furthermore, is there any reason to expect that such a return to 19th century-style economic arrangements would not generate the sort of drastic ups and downs in the economic cycle that they did in that era?”

    Here it seems that Yoshida is provoking the same kind of scare tactics repeatedly employed by the Chris Matthewses and Al Sharptons of the world. [...]

    Here is a question to Yoshida: have any economists ever postulated that central banking might actually be the cause of the business cycle? The answer is yes, and they happen to be the libertarian and conservative economic icons Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich Hayek. [BINGO!!!]

    Here is another question to the author: have you ever entertained the possibility that the Fed was created not for the benefit of the public, but for the benefit of the government and big banks?” [BINGO!!!]

    [...]

    From our standpoint, the very fact that Paul’s ideas seem so extreme only underscores the need for them! Yoshida would have his readers believe that you can move the country piecemeal toward libertarian and constitutional conservative ideals, essentially reversing the trend of the last one hundred years, by taking baby steps backward. Unfortunately, history shows that in regard to democracy, there is only creeping leftism/socialism until a country finally collapses. However, we would rather it not get to that point.”

    Read More Here: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/01/a_defense_of_ron_paul_and_political_boldness.html#ixzz1j0MOfetm

  40. Actually Rick Perry has the best economic plan as considered by the expert interviewed on Cavuto, comparing all the plans of candidates.

    Paul leading….even a Republican majority….would be like trying to herd cats if one looks at his history of “leadership” and bills passed. Guess the ole veto pen would have to come out…more times even than Obama!!

  41. Thanks William….your news brightened my day too !

  42. New Chief of Staff: Former Hedge Fund Exec. at Citigroup, Made Money Off Mortgage Defaults
    http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/new-chief-staff-former-hedge-fund-exec-citigroup-made-money-mortgage-defaults_616230.html

  43. Tebow, Santorum, Perry, Romney and Huntsman. Men who pray. Even the mature Gingrich. Men to admire. Just the type of men I like as role models for our kids rather men who push the legalization of drugs and have no trouble with people who watch porn. Just saying.

  44. Bessie | January 9, 2012 at 3:37 pm | Pat1789; do you think it has anything to do with the new wars abrewen in Chicago???
    http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/01/chicago_political_turf_war_heats_up.html
    —————————————————————————
    Most likely.
    Chicago is all about patronage and city contracts. The new Boss (Rahmbo) is cracking the whip.

  45. Kim Jung Un – FYI

    I am really concerned about North Korea’s appointment of the “dear
    leader”, Kim Jung Ill’s youngest son to be the new leader of North
    Korea– a nuclear power!

    After all, Kim Jung Un (pronounced Kim’s young-un?) had NO military
    experience whatsoever before daddy made him a four-star general in the
    military. This is a snot-nose twerp who has never accomplished
    anything in his life that that would even come close to military
    leadership: he hasn’t even so much as led a cub scout troop, let alone
    coached a sports team or commanded a military platoon.
    So, setting that aside, next they make him the “beloved leader” of the
    country. Terrific!!!

    Oh, crap! I’m sorry. I just remembered that we did the same thing
    here, We took a community organizer who has never worn a uniform and
    made him Commander-in-Chief; a guy who has never led anything more
    than an ACORN demonstration and made him the leader of this country.
    Never mind.

  46. William | January 9, 2012 at 3:33 pm |

    bob strauss | January 9, 2012 at 2:52 pm |

    OldSalt79,

    Obama’s chief of staff Bill Daily resigned, being reported on Rush Limbaugh.
    Could this be the beginning of the end?

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Bob,

    I believe you are correct. This could very well be the beginning of the end. There are far too many issues addressing Obama from all fronts. Certainly this is becoming overwhelming for them to continue the same path. General George Patton and General Douglass MacArthur would certainly be proud of the American flanking maneuvers to expose the enemy such as the known Socialist/Communist Obama and Staff.

    A very proud Temporary Victory for America. Let’s drive forward to expose them all….

    Just saying,
    *************************************
    William, I’d be looking for a way out too, if I had Joe Arpaio breathing down my neck.

    We can only hope that progress is being made in getting this country to pay attention to the fraud that has been perpetrated against her. Drive forward we must, this usurpation cannot be allowed to stand.

    The Constitution is the law of the land, and the requirements for the eligibility of the President must be enforced. We have seen what happens when the requirements for eligibility are swept under the rug.

    Like I have always said, Obama didn’t usurp the Presidency of the United States to show the world what a great President he could be, his intentions I believe are more nefarious, and he has looted and diminished this country at every turn, and he will not stop until he is arrested, in fact, I think he is becoming more bold in his efforts to remove Constitutional safe guards that protect the people from criminals like this guy.

  47. “IRAN’S AHMADINEJAD, VENEZUELA’S CHAVEZ JOKE ABOUT ATOMIC BOMB”

    By Andrew Cawthorne and Brian Ellsworth
    January 9, 2012

    “CARACAS, Jan 9 (Reuters) – Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez lavished each other with praise on Monday, mocked U.S. disapproval and joked about having an atomic bomb at their disposal.

    “Despite those arrogant people who do not wish us to be together, we will unite forever,” the Iranian president told socialist leader Chavez at the start of a visit to four left-leaning Latin American nations.”

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/09/iran-ahmadinejad-venezuela-chavez_n_1194941.html?&icid=maing-grid7%7Cmain5%7Cdl1%7Csec3_lnk2%26pLid%3D126098

  48. Bob,

    My line in the sand stays the same. If there be no leader(s) in congress to declare the U.S. Constitution the valid document and contractual agreement, then not only are they fools, they are certainly tyrannic regardless of party I am neither the fool nor ignorant.

    I just wanted to express that. I agree with a vast part of your opinions expressed here at the CW site.

  49. should read:

    Bob,

    My line in the sand stays the same. If there be no leader(s) in congress to declare the U.S. Constitution the valid document and contractual agreement, then not only are they fools, they are certainly tyrannic regardless of party. I am neither the fool nor ignorant.

    I just wanted to express that. I agree with a vast part of your opinions expressed here at the CW site.

  50. William | January 9, 2012 at 8:52 pm |

    should read:

    Bob,

    My line in the sand stays the same. If there be no leader(s) in congress to declare the U.S. Constitution the valid document and contractual agreement, then not only are they fools, they are certainly tyrannic regardless of party. I am neither the fool nor ignorant.

    I just wanted to express that. I agree with a vast part of your opinions expressed here at the CW site.
    ******************************
    William, I think that is what most of Americans want, the law to be followed, and the TRUTH.

  51. Limbaugh: Fancy WH party proof that Obamas enjoy spending money ‘without having to work for it

    “The Obamas,” a book by New York Times correspondent Jodi Kantor, reveals that the White House secretly hosted an “Alice in Wonderland costume ball,” considered by some to be poor taste in the middle of a recession.

    And while President Barack Obama has been using the language of economic populism to bolster his political standing, conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh said Monday that the president is just an ordinary politician pursuing the trappings of wealth and power for himself.

    “There is something else that explains all of this — the Solyndras, the health care waivers, the entire regime,” Limbaugh said. “I really think it is nothing more complicated than money. I think you have — I’ll never forget Marion Barry at the 1984 Democrat convention, San Francisco. And I don’t know specifically what he was referring to but his speech was, ‘Tonight, tonight we’re on the inside,’ meaning ‘OK finally we got our chance to be in charge of things.’”

    And that theory holds especially true for Obama and his wife, Limbaugh said.

    “Now I believe in addition to whatever drives Obama and his party ideologically, also near the top of the list is the pursuit of money without having to work for it,” he said. “Be able to pass it out to their friends and set their friends up to be wealthy for the rest of their lives. I think there’s all kinds of that going on too.”

    “Look at the way the Obamas live, with Michelle with her separate vacations and not being concerned about how much it costs to take separate airplanes, there’s no question in my mind that they view this as, whatever else they view it as — as an opportunity to live high on the hog without having it cost them a dime,” he continued. “They justify it by thinking ‘we deserve this,’ or ‘we’re owed this’ because of what has been done to us or our ancestors — who knows.”

    Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/01/09/limbaugh-fancy-wh-party-proof-that-obamas-enjoy-spending-money-without-having-to-work-for-it/#ixzz1j168n4IC

  52. “From: Republican Party of Texas
    Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 3:19 PM
    To: thephileous@hotmail.com

    Subject: RE: New TexasGOP.org Contact

    Actually Don, Federal statute changed in 1934 by amendment to the Immigration and Naturalization act so that a Foreign born person has immediate derivative citizenship and is considered a citizen at birth if they are born to one parent who is a USA citizen and thus are considered” Natural Born”. Note Constitution does not say “Native Born” which would require being born in USA. Natural just means at time of birth.. This is why John McCain, George Romney and Lowell Wiecker could all run for President despite being born in Panama, Mexico and France. When Obama was born the act was amended in 1952 requiring at least one parent to be US citizen and live in USA at least 10 years before birth and 5 years after 14. If Obama’s mother met this requirement he is considered “Natural Born” USA citizen even if born in Kenya (Name Redacted)”

    http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/09/has-the-texas-gop-researched-the-meaning-of-natural-born-citizen/
    ***********************
    ***********************
    From “US Department of State” site:
    ———-
    “Birth Abroad to One Citizen and One Alien Parent in Wedlock”

    “A child born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent acquires U.S. citizenship at birth under Section 301(g) of the INA provided the U.S. citizen parent was physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for the time period required by the law applicable at the time of the child’s birth. … For birth between December 24, 1952 and November 13, 1986, a period of ten years, five after the age of fourteen, is required for physical presence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions to transmit U.S. citizenship to the child. The U.S. citizen parent must be genetically related to the child to transmit U.S. citizenship.”

    “Birth Abroad Out-of-Wedlock to a U.S. Citizen Mother”

    “A person born abroad out-of-wedlock to a U.S. citizen mother may acquire U.S. citizenship under Section 309(c) of the INA if the mother was a U.S. citizen at the time of the person’s birth and if the mother was physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the person’s birth. The mother must be genetically related to the person in order to transmit U.S. citizenship.”

    http://travel.state.gov/law/citizenship/citizenship_5199.html
    ***********************
    ***********************
    [If SAD and BHO were married.]:

    “… this is the scenario that would apply if Obama was not born in the United States. Obama’s father was not a United States citizen. Obama can therefore only rely on his United States citizen mother to make him a “citizen of the United States at birth.” But as we can see from 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1401(g) (the only applicable statute), a mother had to be at least 19 years old when she gave birth to the child born abroad in order to transmit her United States citizenship to him. Obama’s mother, born on November 29, 1942, was 18 years old when she gave birth to Obama on August 4, 1961. She was 117 days short from being 19 years old. But she had to be at least 19 years old (14 years old plus 5 years of U.S. physical presence) to satisfy the legal requirement of Sec. 1401(g) (INA Section 301(g)). Therefore, Obama cannot benefit from Sec. 1401(g).

    Hence, if Obama was not born in the United States, under the Fourteenth Amendment he is neither a United States citizen by birth on United States soil nor one by naturalization.”

    http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/12/what-is-putative-president-obamas.html

  53. A Crazy Old Coot

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jan/9/new-hampshire-lawmakers-question-obamas-citizenshi/

    The Republican legislators and their supporters say Mr. Obama doesn’t meet the definition of “natural-born citizen” because his father was Kenyan. They are relying on an 1875 Supreme Court decision that said a natural-born citizen is someone whose parents are both U.S. citizens at the time of his or her birth.

    New Hampshire lawmakers question Obama’s citizenship

    http://www.washingtontimes.com

    President Obama is on the Democratic ballot for New Hampshire’s primary on Tuesday, despite the efforts of some Republican state legislators who argue the president doesn’t qualify as a “natural-born citizen.”

    ////////////////

    Read the rest at the above link.

  54. “KNIGHT: VOTER ID TERRIFIES DEMOCRATS”

    “JUSTICE DEPARTMENT SEEKS TO UNDERMINE OUR ELECTIONS”

    By Robert Knight
    The Washington Times
    Friday, December 30, 2011

    Excerpt:

    “The most consequential election in our lifetime is still 10 months away, but it’s clear from the Obama administration’s order halting South Carolina’s new photo ID law that the Democrats already have brought a gun to a knife fight.

    How else to describe this naked assault on the right of a state to create minimal requirements to curb voter fraud?

    On Dec. 23, Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez sent a letter ordering South Carolina to stop enforcing its photo ID law. Mr. Perez, who heads the Civil Rights Division that booted charges against the New Black Panther Party for intimidating voters in Philadelphia in 2008, said South Carolina’s law would disenfranchise thousands of minority voters.

    South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson rejected Mr. Perez’s math and explained on Fox News why the law is necessary. The state Department of Motor Vehicles audited a state Election Commission report that said 239,333 people were registered to vote but had no photo ID. The DMV found that 37,000 were deceased, more than 90,000 had moved to other states, and others had names not matched to IDs. That left only 27,000 people registered without a photo ID but who could vote by signing an affidavit as to their identity.

    Mr. Wilson told me by phone Thursday that he would file a challenge to the order in federal district court in January. [...]”

    [...]

    “The stakes are enormous, and the Obama administration is quite aware of the danger posed by an aroused electorate on a level playing field.

    With the economy in a ditch, their only hope of stemming the conservative tide might be to rig the returns, especially where political machines still prevail.”

    Read More Here:
    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/dec/30/voter-id-terrifies-democrats/?page=all#pagebreak

    * * * *

    “KUHNER: WILL OBAMA STEAL THE 2012 ELECTION?”

    By Jeffrey T. Kuhner
    The Washington Times
    Friday, December 30, 2011

    Excerpt:

    “Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. claims Jim Crow is returning. In a recent speech, Mr. Holder said that attempts by states to pass voter identification laws will disenfranchise minorities, rolling back the clock to the evil days of segregation. He said that a growing number of minorities fear that “the same disparities, divisions and problems” now afflict America as they did in 1965 prior to the Voting Rights Act. According to the Obama administration, our democracy is being threatened by racist Republicans. Hence, the Justice Department must prevent laws requiring a photo ID to vote from being enacted.

    Mr. Holder argues that voter ID laws disproportionately discriminate against poor blacks and Hispanics – citizens who cannot afford to acquire a driver’s license, passport or other form of photo identification. The latest victim is South Carolina; its voter ID law has been blocked by the Justice Department. Liberal Democrats – taking their cue from the White House – are portraying the national movement for election reform as an authoritarian assault upon civil liberties. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People has even petitioned the United Nations, asking it to declare states’ voter ID laws human rights abuses. For the radical left, America has become Vladimir Putin’s Russia.”

    Read More Here: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/dec/30/voter-id-terrifies-democrats-will-obama-steal-the-/

    * * * *

    “ILLEGALS GRANTED SOCIAL SECURITY”

    The Washington Times
    Thursday, May 18, 2006

    Excerpt:

    “The Senate voted yesterday to allow illegal aliens to collect Social Security benefits based on past illegal employment — even if the job was obtained through forged or stolen documents.

    “There was a felony they were committing, and now they can’t be prosecuted. That sounds like amnesty to me,” said Sen. John Ensign, the Nevada Republican who offered the amendment yesterday to strip out those provisions of the immigration reform bill. “It just boggles the mind how people could be against this amendment.”

    The Ensign amendment was defeated on a 50-49 vote.

    “We all know that millions of undocumented immigrants pay Social Security and Medicare taxes for years and sometimes decades while they work to contribute to our economy,” said Sen. John McCain, Arizona Republican.”

    Read More Here: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2006/may/18/20060518-114132-2456r/

  55. “IRAN TOO CLOSE FOR U.S. COMFORT”

    “Latin Visit, American’s Death Fate Push Limits”

    By Guy Taylor
    The Washington Times
    Monday, January 9, 2012

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jan/9/iran-too-close-for-us-comfort/?page=all#pagebreak

  56. CW,

    The Ron Paul, Barney Frank, George Soros plan to gut the U.S. military 01/03/2012

    _Ron Paul’s Soros Defense Plan

    frontpagemag.com

    Jan. 2, 2012

    by Daniel Greenfield

    It was recently observed that Ron Paul was to the left of Obama on national security and the best evidence for that statement can be found when one year ago Ron Paul joined forces with Barney Frank​ on a proposal to gut national defense via a panel of experts, quite a few of whom were tied to George Soros​.

    In July 2010, Barney Frank and Ron Paul co-authored a Huffington Post article rolling out their Sustainable Defense Task Force. The Task Force “consisting of experts on military expenditures that span the ideological spectrum” would recommend a trillion dollars in defense cuts. The experts, however, didn’t quite “span the ideological spectrum” — more like float under it.

    The panel of experts who would decide how to best gut national defense featured such independent thinkers as William D. Hartung of the New America Foundation. Hartung’s main expertise was appearing in “Hijacking Catastrophe: 9/11, Fear & the Selling of American Empire.”

    Then there was Lawrence J. Kolb of the Center for American Progress and Miriam Pemberton of the Institute for Policy Studies. If you want to know what the Center, the Foundation and the Institute all have in common, it’s Hungarian and smells like stale cabbage and the death of nations.

    The rather creepy Institute for Policy Studies issued a paper proposing that Obama act as king and rule through executive orders. The New American Foundation is not only backed by Soros but has his son on its leadership council. The Center for American Progress is run by the co-chair of Obama’s transition team and is, for all intents and purposes, the think tank of the White House. All three are Soros funded.

    But it doesn’t end there…

    Read this story at frontpagemag.com …

    Add Comment

    Why Ron Paul is not really a Constitutionalist 12/29/2011
    0 Comments

    _Still a Ron Paul Fan?

    By the editor at Lonely Machines

    I wrote briefly about the Congressional amicus curiae brief [pdf] in support of the petitioners in McDonald v. Chicago when it was submitted. We saw a great deal of support from both sides of the political spectrum, but one signature was notable for its glaring omission: Ron Paul.

    I’d been wondering about that, and Howard Nemerov was able to get a statement from Dr. Paul’s office:

    Congressman Paul’s DC office said he didn’t sign the brief because he believes that it interferes with state’s rights, whose policies shouldn’t be dictated by the federal government.

    Let’s get a few things straight here, people. First off, states do not have rights. Like any other government, they have powers that are delegated to them by the people. Only people have rights.

    Second, the 14th Amendment does not conflict with the 10th, and in no way does it interfere with the agendas of individual state governments.

    Some background.. read more

    http://www.lifeandlibertyreport.com/5/category/paul/1.html

  57. In hearing the controversy about Romney’s experience with Bain Capital and the ways of venture capitalism, I am doing some serious thinking as to just how Romney will translate that type of job creation into what is required on a national scale.

    Romney’s experience in the private sector with job creation, certainly appropriate in our private enterprise system, is not to be compared on the same scale with the encouraging of small, private businesses which will generate jobs on their own if given the right climate – lower taxes and much less regulation, plus a sense of security about the future.

    This is not meant to either demean or support Romney, but is rather a frank query as to how he intends to really carry out his goals if he were president.

    Does anyone else have thoughts?

  58. Thank you William for your insight about the CIA agent in Iran. You are so smart. :-)

    I am completely outraged and I don’t see anyone else posting about it. The govt. had the NERVE to say you need an ID to get drain cleaner, don’t you realize how racist that is against blacks and hispanics??? They can’t afford to get an ID and how are they going to unclog their drains??? hee hee, sorry I couldn’t resist…. :-)

  59. From: Michael Savage’s outstanding web site:
    http://www.michaelsavage.wnd.com/page-2-news – Page 2

    I suggest people go to Michael Savage’s web site daily to check out the outstanding featured articles & stories that Michael Savage & staff want to share with people that appear on his pages.

    King Barack’s Power Grab
    (New York Post) pResident Obama played a violent game of kickball with the Constitution …

    EDITORIAL – – KING BARACK’S POWER GRAB – – EDITORIAL
    Posted: January 05, 2012

    “pResident Obama yesterday played a violent game of kickball with the US Constitution, making a number of high-level “recess” appointments — even though the Senate isn’t actually in recess.

    He named former Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray to head the Consumer Financial Protection Board, a nomination Republicans have been fighting.

    And then he named three new members of the pro-union activist National Labor Relations Board.

    Presidents have the right to make temporary appointments when Congress is away from Washington, of course, and both parties have used that power.

    But Obama is the first pResident to declare that he, and he alone, can decide whether the Senate — which must confirm his appointments — is actually meeting.

    In order to block recess appointments, the Senate intentionally has been holding pro forma sessions every few days, each of which lasts only a few seconds.

    Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid — with then-Sen. Obama’s support — did the same thing in 2007 to block any recess appointments by President George W. Bush.

    But now Obama, with Reid’s concurrence, contends that such sessions are actually “gimmicks” — and that the Senate actually is in recess.

    So much for the separation of powers and the carefully calibrated system of checks and balances that are hallmarks of the US constitutional system.

    Obama, of course, plans to run for re-election against Congress, painting it as Wall Street’s puppet.

    But what he did yesterday was no shot across the bow; it was, rather, a direct hit — with the Constitution taking the brunt of the blow.

    Moreover, as the Cato Institute’s Mark Calabria notes, the Dodd-Frank bill, which calls for the creation of the CFPB, explicitly requires that its director be “confirmed by the Senate.”

    That means that Obama’s nonrecess “recess” appointment may well violate the law, in addition to coming as part of a blatantly unconstitutional overreach.

    Then again, this is not the first time Team Obama has sidestepped Congress; just consider some of its aggressive regulatory measures done with no legislative authorization whatsoever.

    Democrats like to criticize anything that smacks of an “imperial” presidency — but now it seems they’ve got one.”

    http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/editorials/king_barack_power_grab_FQVJqAlOM3eplEuV7fNxDN#ixzz1j3UiX8Hv

    * * * *

    “OUTRAGE AT PREZ’S SENATE END RUN”

    By ANDY SOLTIS
    Posted: 12:28 AM, January 5, 2012

    Excerpt:

    “A defiant President Obama brazenly bypassed Senate Republicans and installed his nominee as “America’s consumer watchdog” in a try-and- stop-me move that is certain to trigger new showdowns with Congress.

    In a campaign-style speech in the most Democratic congressional district of the battleground state of Ohio, Obama defended his recess appointment of Richard Cordray.

    An outraged House Speaker John Boehner denounced the move as “an unprecedented power grab,” and said it would be fought in court.

    GOP presidential hopeful Mitt Romney called it “Chicago-style politics at its worst.”

    But Obama further infuriated Republicans by appointing three members of the National Labor Relations Board.

    Senate Republicans had blocked those appointments, as well as Cordray’s, and all 47 GOP legislators had warned Obama in a letter that it would be a dangerous precedent to bypass them.”

    Read More Here: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/outrage_at_prez_senate_end_run_FOQXAzNwGvpZxPJLjWDWhP

  60. Interested Bystander

    Tina commented:

    “Just the type of men I like as role models for our kids rather men who push the legalization of drugs and have no trouble with people who watch porn.”

    I get sick and tired of Tina posting these LIES. Flat out LIES.

    Paul is NOT for the “leglization of drugs”.

    Paul is FOR allowing STATES to decideed what is legal in their STATE and get rid of the FEDERAL Laws that do nothing but discriminate against minorities.

    Are you a racist Tina?

    And I’ve watched Paul many times, and for the life of me, I can’t remember ONE TIME Ron Paul even saying the word “porn”.

    What is your OBSESSION with “porn” Tina?

    So quit posting out and out LIES about the man I support Tina.

    It shows YOUR desperation.

    As I have commented MANY times, I’d LOVE to have an ADULT, honest debate on the ISSUES, not made up crap posted by someone who doesn’t even know what the word “conservative” means, or just learned AFTER voting Democrat for how many years Tina?

  61. ~ TENNESSEE UNDERWORLD ~

    “AL GORE PROTECTS LOCAL CORRUPTION?”

    “VICE PRESIDENT’S HOME STATE ‘EVIL PLACE,’ SAYS INVESTIGATOR”

    Published: 10/12/2000 at 1:00 AM

    http://www.wnd.com/2000/10/4288/

    * * * *

    “SECOND UPDATE ON WALTER FITZPATRICK, III – REPORTS:
    SLEEPING ON FLOOR, DIABETIC FOOT ULCER, POOR HYGIENE”

    By Sharon Rondeau
    January 8, 2012

    http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/08/update-on-walter-francis-fitzpatrick-iii/

    Two Comments Under Sharon Rondeau’s Article Above:

    “Moonbeam says:
    Monday, January 9, 2012 at 4:33 PM

    First of all, may God bless you, Sharon, for all the support you have given Walter.

    I am simply overcome by the horrific conditions Walter is enduring. Where is the outrage???”
    _______________

    “John Sutherland says:
    Monday, January 9, 2012 at 5:45 AM

    It does not appear there is any degree of accountability in Monroe County at all. These jailers will continue to deny freedom and resources from Fitzpatrick. They will use force and violence to assure they stay in control. They are corrupt and the rule of law means nothing to them. Monroe County is representative of what is wrong with government in this country and why the people need to remove the corruption from their government or they are doomed as a people.
    —————
    Mrs. Rondeau replies: Months ago, a reader, or perhaps an Obot, commented that The Post & Email was wasting its time covering events in Monroe County; that she thought we had “lost our way” because she had expected us to focus on the Obama eligibility issue. However, you have identified exactly the reason why we have continued to cover Monroe County: what begins as local corruption and loss of freedom for the people expands to the state and federal levels. In my opinion, Monroe County, TN is a clear example of how the country arrived at the endemic corruption of all levels of government, including the fraudulent election of “Barack Obama.” False affidavits, unsigned arrest warrants, racketeering, rigged grand juries, negligent U.S. attorneys, crooked prosecutors and home invasions on the part of law enforcement have led to an entrenched police state in Monroe County, which we have seen at the state and federal levels as well. It is up to We the People to decide what to do about it, as government will not police its own.”

  62. Cabby – AZ | January 10, 2012 at 12:01 am |

    Good observation Cabby, at some point he needs to give out some detail.

  63. Interested Bystander

    From Starla at 10:00pm,

    “We all know that millions of undocumented immigrants pay Social Security and Medicare taxes for years and sometimes decades while they work to contribute to our economy,” said Sen. John McCain, Arizona Republican.”

    And that is EXACTLY what is WRONG with this Country. I am embarrassed that I have to admit that I voted for this LOSER.

    We punish people who work hard and HONEST their whole lives, and reward people who have earned while BREAKING the law.

    I say round them up and send them “home”. The whole lot of them. If they came here ILLEGALLY, then they BROKE the law and ALL of their earnings are STOLEN.

    I don’t care if they’ve been here 50 years or one day, they INVADED our Country, and should be DEPORTED pronto.

    Obama’s Aunt and Uncle should be the first to go.

    Whatever happend to Obama’s Uncle anyway? I wouldn’t be surprised if he was invited to that posh costume party the media is just now reporting on.

  64. I think Tina is misinformed. Ron Paul stands for personal responsibility. Unfortunately, the sheeple in today’s society can not think for themselves so they need someone to think for them. Tina has not read the bill of rights nor the constitution. We the people have the power! Politicians work for us but today the people have laid down their brains for mush.

  65. “10 QUESTIONS TO FIND OUR NEXT PRESIDENT (PART 1)”

    Chuck Norris
    January 3, 2012

    http://townhall.com/columnists/chucknorris/2012/01/03/10_questions_to_find_our_next_president_part_1/page/full/

    * * * *

    “10 QUESTIONS TO FIND OUR NEXT PRESIDENT
    (PART 2)”

    Chuck Norris
    January 10, 2012

    http://townhall.com/columnists/chucknorris/2012/01/10/10_questions_to_find_our_next_president_part_2/page/full/

    * * * *

    “FINALLY: ATF OFFICIALS INVOLVED IN FAST AND FURIOUS REPRIMANDED”

    Katie Pavlich
    News Editor, Townhall
    January 9, 2012

    http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2012/01/09/finally_atf_officials_involved_in_fast_and_furious_reprimanded

  66. Interested Bystander

    ttrishstar commented:

    “I think Tina is misinformed.”

    You are being too kind to suggest that she is simply “misinformed”. She’s IGNORANT. I have tried time and again to get her to research the crap she writes, and even supplied links, but she simply refuses to do so.

    ttrishstar continues:

    “Ron Paul stands for personal responsibility.”

    Something else Tina is “misinformed” on. Tina believes that the Government should DICTATE people’s personal responsibility. And then if the Government can’t do that, Tina doesn’t hold those PEOPLE responsible for their actions (probably because they were “sexually harassed” by Herman Cain), and believes the Government should supply a “safety net” for them.

    ttrishstar goes on:

    “Unfortunately, the sheeple in today’s society can not think for themselves so they need someone to think for them.”

    And Tina fits right in with those “sheeple”.

    ttrishstar next comments:

    “Tina has not read the bill of rights nor the constitution.”

    And I don’t believe she has any plans to do so in the near future. Kind of goes along with that IGNORANT thing I commented earlier.

    ttrishstar comments:

    “We the people have the power!”

    Not according to Tina.

    ttrishstar concludes:

    “Politicians work for us but today the people have laid down their brains for mush.”

    But for people like Tina, who have no desire to EDUCATE themselves, continue to allow the Government to indoctrinate our kids, and train them to become dependent on the Government.

  67. Good Morning All; Jody Kantor’s book comes out today “the Obama’s”, just one day after the announcement of Bill Daley’s retirement…Keep an eye out for the Obamaphiles coming out of the woodwork to their much needed defense…Chicago’s Sun-Times is already coming to their aid.

  68. Interested Bystander

    One more thing:

    I believe that Ron Paul is the best man for the job at the moment, and I also believe that with all of the negative reporting being done on Dr Paul, he is doing EXTREMELY well.

    Even when Santorum called him a “Libertarian” at the debate this weekend, I have not read ONE story about how Paul has been elected as a REPUBLICAN every time he has won an election. As far as I know, Paul only ran as a LIbertarian ONCE, in 1988. How is this comment by Santorum NOT a slap in the face to every person who has voted to elect Paul? REPUBLICAN voters.

    No one points out that of the over 3000 legislators since 1937, Ron Paul has the most CONSERVATIVE voting record than ANY of those other over 3000 legislators, and that would include Santorum AND Newt.

    And Rick Perry calls him a “hypocrite” for simply playing the Washington “game” and placing “riders” on bills and then voting against them. The REAL story ought to be WHY these legislators HAVE to play the “game”.

    I hear people say that Paul couldn’t get his agenda through if he won election, but my response to that is that the Congress ALLOCATES money for this or that. There is NOTHING in the Constitution that states the President has to use that money, and nothing in the Constitution says that he can’t send that money back to Congress.

    There’s nothing in the Constitution that says the President has to appoint heads of all of these “departments”.

    It would only be reasonable that IF the Supreme Court says that this or that department is authorised to be established under our Constitution, then it would also be Constitutional to dismantle those “departments”.

    And can someone, anyone who thinks Paul’s foreign policy agenda is “dangerous”, please explain to me WHY the military supports Paul monetarily by more than ALL of the other candidates COMBINED? Aren’t these the folks who would suffer the most if we were to put in this “dangerous” policy?

    Maybe oldsalt could give us a history lesson on how the USSR was brought down.

    Ron Paul is the man who can turn this ship around and make us prosperous, respected and FREE again.

    When will we learn?

  69. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    There is only ONE way the Republicans can win the coming election.

    1 – Ron Paul runs as an Independent. This will result in a giant sucking
    sound as Liberals who love Paul defect from the Democrats.

    2 – No one wins the 271 Electoral College votes necessary to win
    the election.
    3 – The current Republican controlled Congress SELECTS THE NEXT
    PRESIDENT.

    THANK GOD WE ARE A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC!

  70. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    PS – There is no DemocraTIC Party. It is the DEMOCRAT PARTY. And we are not a Democracy, but a Constitutional Republic.

  71. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    PPS – A true Democracy is MOB RULE.

  72. http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/3838769-418/fbi-looking-at-cook-countys-project-shield.html

    @ Bessie

    Rahmbo and his Suntimes pals are whacking the heads of Chicago’s 5 family’s.

    1.Daley- coverup of murder
    2.Stroeger- corruption
    3.Quinn – next?
    3.Madigan-next?
    4.Hynes-next?

  73. “Maybe oldsalt could give us a history lesson on how the USSR was brought down.”
    —————————————————————————————————

    We out spent them militarily. Something DR PAUL would not have done.

    Ron Paul knows he can’t win, he’s just setting up his son for 2016, who doesn’t have the nutter baggage.

    Prediction, the next 3 US POTUS will be 1 term.

  74. Judge Rhonda Nishimura in HI granted my motion to expedite the hearing on Reciprocal Subpoena enforcement. New hearing is this Friday, January 13, 10:30am. I will be flying to HI for the 5th time!

    Posted on | January 9, 2012 http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/

    I hope, I survive this HI saga.

    Last Friday morning I was completely crashed when judge Nishimura scheduled the hearing on Reciprocal Subpoena enforcement from GA to be heard on January 26, same day as trial in GA.

    Right after the hearing I ran to the nearby Fedex-Kinkos, where they have computers, did on line research and drafted a new motion and submitted it to judge Nishimura before my flight to CA.

    I just got off the phone with judge’s legal assistant Jamie, she stated that my motion was granted by judge Nishimura and the new hearing will be this Friday at 10:30 am. This is a positive aspect.

    The negative aspect, is the fact, that this will be the fifth time I will be flying to HI to a hearing. It is depleting all the donations. I hate to ask, but donations and frequent flier miles will come very handy. This is a very tough fight. You know the resources, that might opponent has, but with your help we are moving along. Thank you for your support .

  75. The Three Legs of the Natural Born Citizen Demand Obama

    FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:

    by Cody Robert Judy, ©2012

    Did the Framers intend that a person with dual citizenship be eligible for the Presidency?

    (Jan. 9, 2012) — Featured on the FOX NEWS Channel from the Political Grapevine, Barack Obama’s Motion to Dismiss was denied in a Georgia Law Court concerning his eligibility to be placed on the Ballot for President in 2012. Cody Robert Judy, also running for President in the Democrat Party, is on that Ballot Challenge as well as the contest facing Obama in the New Hampshire State Supreme Court.

    While the challenges for the perpetuation of the U.S. Constitution’s demand for a natural born citizen have again surfaced in the Presidential election of 2012, indeed so have the desperate ‘racist’ charges reducing Obama as a victim of circumstances beyond his qualifications for president to that of his color.

    Pitting Obama’s color as leverage to supplant the Constitution demands that one be born in the United States to Citizen Parents concedes the dangerous ground Obama in fact treads with the release of his long form birth certificate showing his father was indeed a citizen of Kenya at the time of Obama’s birth.

    Read more…http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/09/the-three-legs-of-the-natural-born-citizen-demand-obama/

  76. Certainly the poor or those unable to drive may not have voter ID in the form of a Driver’s License, but you can go to DMV and get a non-driver’s photo ID using a birth certificate or SSAN card? Could the commaner in chief (obummer) if queried for proof at the voting booth, could always whip out the passport he got just as a comp for being a Senator. He may be able to drive, but does he own a driver’s license? If he does, would be interesting to see what he used for proof to get one, especially since their was an accident in Hawaii by a person of his name in his youth where he didn’t show up for a court appearance so his name must have been flagged?

  77. The media is casting Ron Paul as crazy. The problem: the people are too ignorant to see the truth that Ron Paul is telling. Brain dead people are taught to be PC which only stands for lying legally for the crooks in Washington. Americans better wake up !! I for one am not going to tolerate some two bit dictator and minions to tell me what to do. I for one have been educated and still learning that the Politicians and the courts have no authority over me and anyone else who dares to stand up to their rights as an American.

  78. Well here is a Great read for everyone..long but full of information as to how ‘WE HAVE BEEN SCREWED’ have you seen this?? Entitled VKD: with the exception of Ron Paul, I’m not that smart, but I do believe she is trying to expose something of GREAT importance here, you decide. http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=227007

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s