Obama GA ballot challenge, Natural born citizen status, Judge Michael Malihi, Why did Obama refuse matching funds in 2008?, Part 2, Robert Bauer et al help Obama hide records

Obama GA ballot challenge, Natural born citizen status, Judge Michael Malihi, Why did Obama refuse matching funds in 2008?, Part 2, Robert Bauer et al help Obama hide records

“Why did Obama, prior to occupying the White House, employ Robert Bauer of Perkins Coie, to assist him in avoiding the presentation of a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells

“Why has Obama, since taking the White House, used Justice Department Attorneys, at taxpayer expense,  to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells

“Why is Obama now employing private attorneys to keep his name on state ballots, despite compelling evidence that he is not a natural born citizen?…Citizen Wells

WHY DID OBAMA REFUSE MATCHING FUNDS IN 2008?

PART 2

Robert Bauer, et al help Obama keep his records hidden.

In Part 1 it was revealed that Obama, in 2008, despite support for and a earlier pledge to accept them, opted out of Federal Matching Funds.

“If I am the Democratic nominee, I will aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election.”

“Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, announced this morning that he will not enter into the public financing system, despite a previous pledge to do so.”

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2012/01/17/obama-ga-ballot-challenge-natural-born-citizen-status-judge-michael-malihi-why-did-obama-refuse-matching-funds-in-2008-part-1/

Advisory Opinion Request: General Election Public Funding

From Obama attorney Robert Bauer to FEC

February 1,2007
“This request for an Advisory Opinion is filed on behalf of Senator Barack Obama and the committee, the Obama Exploratory Committee, that he established to fund his exploration of a Presidential candidacy. The question on which he seeks the Commission’s guidance is whether, if Senator Obama becomes a candidate, he may provisionally raise funds for the general election but retain the option, upon nomination, of returning these contributions and accepting the public funds for which he would be eligible as the Democratic Party’s nominee.”

“Senator Obama, fully committed to competition on the same terms as all other
candidates, has decided that, if he becomes a candidate, he will also instruct his campaign to proceed with active fundraising for the general election. But the Senator would not, if the law allows, rule out the possibility of a publicly funded campaign if both major parties’ nominees eventually decide, or even agree, on this course. Should both major party nominees elect to receive public funding, this would preserve the public financing system, now in danger of collapse, and facilitate the conduct of campaigns freed from any dependence on private fundraising.”

“The legal question presented under Commission regulations is whether a candidate provisionally raising general election funds, segregated from other funds and not available for expenditure until nomination, has “accepted” this money. Candidates establishing eligibility must certify that they have not accepted money for the general election. 11 C.F.R. § 9003.2(a)(2). The rules do not address the question posed here: has the candidate accepted the money if it is held in escrow and never used, allowing for these funds to be returned and for the candidate to qualify for public funding?”

FEC advisory opinion

From Robert D. Lenhard to Robert Bauer

March 1, 2007

“We are responding to your advisory opinion request on behalf of Senator Barack Obama and Obama for America, formerly known as the Obama Exploratory  Committee (the “Committee”),1 requesting whether Senator Obama may, under the Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act (the “Fund Act”), as amended, the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (“FECA”), and Commission regulations, solicit and receive private contributions for the 2008 presidential general election while retaining the option of refunding the contributions and receiving public funds for the general election if he receives his party’s nomination for President.

The Commission concludes that Senator Obama may solicit and receive private contributions for the 2008 presidential general election without losing his
eligibility to receive public funding if he receives his party’s nomination for President, if he (1) deposits and maintains all private contributions
designated for the general election in a separate account, (2) refrains from using these contributions for any purpose, and (3) refunds the private
contributions in full if he ultimately decides to receive public funds.”
“Senator Barack Obama is a United States Senator from Illinois, elected in 2004, who is a candidate seeking the nomination of the Democratic Party for the office of President of the United States in the 2008 election. The Committee is his principal campaign committee.”

“If a candidate fails to qualify for the general election, any contributions designated for the general election that have been received from contributors who have already reached their contribution limit for the primary election would exceed FECA’s contribution limits.”

Obama helps block Republican FEC appointee.

From the Washington Post December 11, 2007.

“Paralyze The FEC? Splendid.”

“What if the country held an election and there was no one to make sure that candidates played by the rules — no agency that could issue regulations, write advisory opinions or bring enforcement actions against those breaking the law?”

“The six-person FEC — three members from each party — enforces the rules it writes about how Americans are permitted to participate in politics.”

“The FEC’s policing powers may soon be splendidly paralyzed. Three current FEC members, two Democrats and one Republican, are recess appointees whose terms will end in a few days when this session of Congress ends — unless they are confirmed to full six-year terms.

Four Senate Democrats decided to block the Republican, Hans von Spakovsky. Republicans have responded: “All three or none.” If this standoff persists until Congress adjourns, the three recess appointments will expire and the FEC will have just two members — a Republican vacancy has existed since April. If so, the commission will be prohibited from official actions, including the disbursement of funds for presidential candidates seeking taxpayer financing.”

“The Post wants von Spakovsky confirmed only to keep the FEC functioning. He is being blocked because four senators have put “holds” on his nomination. One of those four who might be responsible for preventing the FEC from being able to disburse taxpayer funds to Democratic presidential candidates Joe Biden, Chris Dodd and John Edwards is . . . Barack Obama.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/10/AR2007121001559.html?hpid=opinionsbox1

Philip J Berg files lawsuit in Philadelphia Federal Court

August 21, 2008

Defendants: Obama, DNC, FEC

Obama is not a Natural Born Citizen and therefore ineligible to be President.

August 27, 2008

Complaint served on the U.S. Attorney for DNC and FEC

Motion filed by Robert Bauer, et al October 6, 2008

“BRIEF OF DEFENDANT DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE
AND DEFENDANT SENATOR BARACK OBAMA
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
STAYING DISCOVERY PENDING DECISION ON
DISPOSITIVE MOTION”
“In his Complaint, plaintiff Berg alleges that Senator Barack Obama, the
Democratic Party’s nominee for President of the United States, is not eligible to serve as President under Article II, section 1 of the Constitution because, Mr. Berg alleges (falsely), Senator Obama is purportedly not a natural-born citizen. Complaint ¶3. Mr. Berg seeks a declaratory judgment that Senator Obama is ineligible to run for President; an injunction barring Senator Obama from running for that office; and an injunction barring the DNC from nominating him.

On September 15, 2008, plaintiff Berg served on Senator Obama’s office a
request for production of seventeen different categories of documents, including copies of all of the Senator’s college and law school applications, requests for financial aid, college and law school papers, and “a copy of your entire presidential file pertaining to being vetted.” Plaintiff also served 56 requests for admission on Senator Obama. On that same date, plaintiff served on the DNC 27 requests for admission and requests for production of five categories of documents, including all documents in the possession of the DNC
relating to Senator Obama.1

On September 24, 2008, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for
lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim, on the grounds that, as a matter of law, plaintiff has no standing to challenge the qualifications of a candidate for President of the U.S. and has no federal cause of action.”

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION’S OPPOSITION TO
EMERGENCY MOTION FOR AN IMMEDIATE INJUNCTION TO STAY
THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 4, 2008

October 21, 2008

“II. BECAUSE THE COMMISSION HAS NO JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE WHETHER CANDIDATES MEET THE CONSTITUTIONAL CRITERIA FOR PRESIDENTIAL ELIGIBILITY, IT SHOULD BE DISMISSED FROM THIS CASE

The Commission is the independent agency of the United States government vested with exclusive jurisdiction to administer, interpret and enforce civilly the FECA. See 2 U.S.C. §§ 437c(b)(1), 437d(a), 437d(e) and 437g. The Commission also exercises jurisdiction over the Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act, 26 U.S.C. §§ 9001 et seq., and the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act, 26 U.S.C. §§ 9031 et seq.2 These statutes only confer on the Commission jurisdiction over issues concerning the financing of federal campaigns: regulating the organization of campaign committees; the raising, spending, and disclosing of campaign funds; and the receipt and use of public funding for qualifying candidates.

None of these statutes delegates to the FEC authority to determine the constitutional eligibility of federal candidates, and Berg does not allege otherwise. Although the Commission determines whether certain presidential candidates are eligible for public funding, it has no power to determine who qualifies for ballot access or who is eligible to serve as president. Thus, because the Commission has no authority to take action against Senator Obama as suggested by Berg, the Commission should be dismissed from this case with prejudice.”

From the FEC motion above:

“On September 24, 2008, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for
lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim, on the grounds that, as a matter of law, plaintiff has no standing to challenge the qualifications of a candidate for President of the U.S. and has no federal cause of action.”

This is true.

From Robert Bauer, et al’s motion:

“Although the Commission determines whether certain presidential candidates are eligible for public funding, it has no power to determine who qualifies for ballot access or who is eligible to serve as president.”

This is also true. However, if an advisory opinion requesting Obama’s eligibility for matching funds, questioning his Natural Born Citizen status, had been submitted before Obama opted out, it appears that the FEC would have been compelled to respond and their response could be challenged.

It is becoming clear why Obama did not accept matching federal funds in 2008.

More on this chicanery to come.

About these ads

126 responses to “Obama GA ballot challenge, Natural born citizen status, Judge Michael Malihi, Why did Obama refuse matching funds in 2008?, Part 2, Robert Bauer et al help Obama hide records

  1. Friday, January 20, 2012 (As of 01/20/12 at 05:46:44 AM )

    Honorable James B. Zagel Courtroom 2503 (JBZ)

    1:08-cr-00888 USA v. Cellini 03:30 In Court Hearing

  2. Wednesday, January 25, 2012 (As of 01/20/12 at 06:47:43 AM

    Honorable Amy J. St. Eve Courtroom 1241 (ASE)

    1:05-cr-00691 USA v. Levine 08:45 Status Hearing
    1:05-cr-00691 USA v. Loren 08:45 Status Hearing

  3. Good Morning! Good debate last night. Are you close enough to go to hearing in Georgia?

  4. Good Morning All: Thanks CW, do you think Cellini will get another trial? Great debate Zach, loved seeing the liberal media get slammed.

  5. Bessie – I stood up and cheered.

  6. Good morning Zach, Bessie, et al.
    Cellini new trial? 50 50

  7. I can go to hearing if helpful.
    Must always weigh cost vs benefit.
    Much of my worth is posting info.

  8. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    BEWARE – There is a movement afoot to get rid of the Electoral College. The electoral College is the cornerstone to our Republic. It was set up to make sure all states got EQUAL attention from ALL the candidates instead of JUST THE BIG ONES. Remember we are a Consitutional Republic and NOT A DEMOCRACY(MOB RULE)!!
    If this came about California and New York would control everything and you know where they are coming from.
    PS – The Electoral College may be the only weapon we will have to defeat this USURPER we now have. A 3 Party race in the coming election would most likely end with NO ONE getting the 271 Electoral College votes to win the election and the Republican controlled U.S. House of Representatives would make the selection.

    http://www.delawareonline.com/article/20120119/NEWS02/201190349/Electoral-voting-effort-stalls?odyssey=tab%7Ctopnews%7Ctext%7CHome

  9. CW,

    Maybe its not said enough or often. But your efforts and personal time into these matters are well commendable and certainly appreciated.

    Just letting you know my personal take, Thanks..

  10. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    PS – If we were not a Constitutional Republic with the Electoral College system, Al Gore would have won the 2000 Election.

  11. Thanks William.

  12. Will first time ever, non-elected citizen, Valerie Jarrett continue to receive Secret Service protection when O’bummer is kicked out the back door of our White House?

  13. Found this on Facebook.

    Federal Official In Arizona To Plead The Fifth And Not Answer Questions On ‘furious’ | Fox News
    The chief of the Criminal Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Arizona is refusing to testify before Congress regarding Operation Fast and Furious, the federal gun-running scandal that sent U.S. weapons to Mexico.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/20/federal-official-in-arizona-to-plead-fifth-and-not-answer-questions-on-furious/

  14. “Testimony in a Chicago federal court claims that the Department of Justice willingly and knowing gave Fast & Furious guns directly to the bloody Sinaloa drug cartel of Mexico”

    http://www.libertynewsonline.com/article_301_31436.php

    Bob; did you see this? It looks like Eric Holder is going to be very busy trying to cover his tracks…

  15. rminnc | January 20, 2012 at 9:36 am |

    Will first time ever, non-elected citizen, Valerie Jarrett continue to receive Secret Service protection when O’bummer is kicked out the back door of our White House?
    ***************************************
    She will get her protection via the penal system.

  16. Bessie | January 20, 2012 at 9:50 am |
    Bob; did you see this? It looks like Eric Holder is going to be very busy trying to cover his tracks…
    ************************************
    Bessie, I did see that article.

    It looks like they were doing their best to manufacture a reason to condemn the second amendment of the Constitution and enact more regulations regarding Americas Militia.

    My gut feeling is, the enemy has taken control of our government.

  17. Mornin folks,

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/georgia-representative-and-attorney.html

    Georgia Representative and Attorney Mark Hatfield Files Notice to Produce Against Obama

    Attorney Mark Hatfield on behalf of Carl Swensson and Kevin Powell filed a notice to produce records against Obama in the Georgia Ballot Challenge. Attorney Hatfield also filed a motion for determination of placement of burden of proof in the challenge. Also Judge Malihi issued an order today related to the motion for determination which is linked below. All 3 new filings linked below.

  18. Al Garza on the Minutemen, FEMA Camps and Who Should Be Our Next President

    IS “HOMELAND SECURITY” UP TO THE PEOPLE?

    by Sher Zieve, ©2012

    http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/18/al-garza-on-the-minutemen-fema-camps-and-who-should-be-our-next-president/

  19. 8:47 am —

    “BEWARE – There is a movement afoot to get rid of the Electoral College. The electoral College is the cornerstone to our Republic. It was set up to make sure all states got EQUAL attention from ALL the candidates instead of JUST THE BIG ONES. Remember we are a Consitutional Republic and NOT A DEMOCRACY(MOB RULE)!!”
    ==========
    “HOW ADOPTING the “NATIONAL POPULAR VOTE INITIATIVE” CAN STEAL an ELECTION ‘BY HOOK’ and ‘BY CROOK’”

    http://jbjd.org/2010/07/24/npvi-by-hook-and-by-crook/

  20. observer | January 20, 2012 at 10:07 am |

    Mornin folks,

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/georgia-representative-and-attorney.html

    Georgia Representative and Attorney Mark Hatfield Files Notice to Produce Against Obama

    Attorney Mark Hatfield on behalf of Carl Swensson and Kevin Powell filed a notice to produce records against Obama in the Georgia Ballot Challenge. Attorney Hatfield also filed a motion for determination of placement of burden of proof in the challenge. Also Judge Malihi issued an order today related to the motion for determination which is linked below. All 3 new filings linked below
    ***************************************************
    Have we finally found a judge that will follow the law?

  21. Everyone should send a “Thank You Very Much” card to Mr Usurper . Obama at 1600 Penn. Ave., Washington, DC, for his utter stupidity regarding the Keystone Oil Project.

    Twenty thousand jobs (that’s 20,000), and all of Canada’s oil which would have come to the United States….LOST…… to CHINA.

    I just read on Drudge this morning where Canada now plans to lay their pipeline to British Columbia and send ALL THEIR OIL TO CHINA.

    I predict by summer of 2013, American’s will be paying ten dollars a gallon for gas in America…every VOTER should remember how gas has doubled in price in the three years that STUPID has been in office.

    That should be the last thing they remember before pulling the voting lever in November…..that they were force to trade food for gas.

    Before voting, take the following simple test:

    Are you better off today than you were three years ago……
    Will you be better off in November than you are now………..
    Will three more years of the USURPER solve your problems……..

    If you answered YES to all the above, then you are as dumb as a doorknob and rightfully deserve THE ONE YOU HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR.

    If you answered NO, you have successfully passed the test…now go and vote, and encourage everyone else to vote, for anyone other than Usurper Obama…….

    I may even vote again for Ronald Regan ! (well the Democrats vote dead people, why can’t I?)

  22. GORDO | January 20, 2012 at 10:27 am |

    8:47 am —

    “BEWARE – There is a movement afoot to get rid of the Electoral College. The electoral College is the cornerstone to our Republic. It was set up to make sure all states got EQUAL attention from ALL the candidates instead of JUST THE BIG ONES. Remember we are a Consitutional Republic and NOT A DEMOCRACY(MOB RULE)!!”
    ==========
    “HOW ADOPTING the “NATIONAL POPULAR VOTE INITIATIVE” CAN STEAL an ELECTION ‘BY HOOK’ and ‘BY CROOK’”

    http://jbjd.org/2010/07/24/npvi-by-hook-and-by-crook/
    *******************************************
    I am leery of of the electronic voting machines. I would rather see purple thumbs, even if it does discriminate against the dead voters.

  23. http://interstatedeposition.com/compellingout-of-statewitness.htm

    Compelling an Out-Of-State Witness to Give Testimony or Produce Records at a Deposition for Use in a Foreign Jurisdiction

    There’s a service for everything:

    Determining What, Where and How To Obtain Local Subpoena

    Interstate Deposition Subpoena Service is available to assist clients with the issuance of local deposition subpoenas in any jurisdiction throughout the United States. To determine what is required in the trial state to obtain that court’s permission to conduct an out-of-state deposition, or what is required in the deposition state to obtain a local subpoena for a non-party witness, simply call us at (800) 981-0088 to speak to one of our representatives.

  24. RMinNC,

    Val is running the WH. Of that, I have no doubt.

    just saying the obvious…

  25. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    bob strauss & Gordo – Just remember that if NPV(National Popular Vote) was passed, AL GORE would have been President in the 2000 election!!
    GOD HELP US

  26. William…I, as you have stated, have no doubt of that…but is she authorized by LAW to have Secret Service protection?……

    Now that was a boo-boo on my part….when ever has obama followed the LAW.

    and Bob…I hope her protection is provided as you have stated…Penal Protection (that almost sounds vulgar) ! Best kind for criminals.

  27. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    PS – A representative for NPV was on MSNBC this AM on Morning Joe.

    JUST REMEMBER –

    “MSNBC IS THE RECTAL THERMOMETER FOR POTOMAC FEVER”

  28. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    Here is why the Supreme Court is important – TOP HEADLINE ON DRUDGE

    “Supreme Court rejects judge-drawn Texas election maps”

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/20/us-usa-politics-texas-idUSTRE80J16A20120120

  29. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    DID ANYONE KNOW THIS? – From a commenter on Texas article

    greatnesslost wrote:
    Texas should activate a little known clause in its annexation treaty with the rest of the country: Split into four States, each with two senators to ensure Harry Reid does not serve as Senate leader after the next election.

  30. Mr. Bill, Actually Texas can split into 5 states. :)

  31. BREAKING NEWS……..BREAKING NEWS

    Just moments ago, Judge Micheal Malihi DENIED Obama’s attorney’s request to QUASH Orley Taitz’s request for all of Obama’s records to include, ORIGINAL birth records, aliases, SS numbers, school records, and all other documentation concerning his claim to be a “natural-born” citizen.

    This means that Obama has until the 26th of Jan to come up with documents that would validate his place on the Georgia ballot as the Democrat candidate for President…..otherwise his house of cards will tumble and he will “go directly to jail…do not pass goal or collect 2oo dollars”

    Oh Happy Day, oh happy day !!!..the sun will shine in Mudville, Casey will bat again! The birds will sing, and our Constitution will have meaning again….

    God bless America, and God Bless and guide the honorable Judge Malihi in his decision six days from now. The world is watching….. regardless if the main stream media is totally blind and tone deaf to reality.

    AM I BEING TOO OPTIMISTIC ?

  32. But from Article IV, Section 3 says new states need the consent of Congress.

  33. rmcinnc: Got a link?

  34. GO TO: orley taitz esquire.com

  35. bankroller….also giveusliberty.com

  36. bankroller…..also birtherreport.com

  37. bankroller…..also ObamaReleaseYourRecords.com

  38. rminnc | January 20, 2012 at 1:01 pm |
    AM I BEING TOO OPTIMISTIC ?
    ******************************
    No, rminnc, you, as I, are being hopeful !! I think we need to continue to follow this case very closely, because we have been SO disappointed so many times in the past. My optimism is guarded, to be absolutely truthful.
    I will feel more assured when the actual proceedings take place.

  39. RMINNC…………………..
    How about that! We finally have a breath of fresh air from our court system. However I will fully believe it when I SEE IT HAPPENING.
    *************************************************************************************
    Did you happen to watch any of the hearings regarding the PIPELINE. It was OBVIOUSLY a STACKED deck. ONE SNOT NOSED child prodigy after another each spent three minutes reciting their (ALLEGED) resons why the pipeline should NOT happen. I have never in my life heard such CHILDISH,INACURATE,and otherwise totally half witted reasoning from these so called YOUTHFUL people who were allegedly appointed by various entities as their spokesmen,and spokesawomen.

  40. I realised that the entire hearing was a LIBERAL PLOY designed to make the viewing public believe that UP is DOWN. Most of the CHILD prodigies didn’t even appear to be DRY BEHIND their ears yet, and at least one of them was wearing a pair of jeans that had patched holes, etc. Really tells on them. They think they FOOL EVERYBODY. Once again I point to Honest Abe’s little recital about FOOLING PEOPLE. Truer words have never been utterred.

  41. OLD SALT…..

    Yes I did watch some of that hearing…your so right. It was childish, inaccurate, and unnecessary!.

    Obama’s EGO and his followers know no bounds !

  42. A Crazy Old Coot

    I have begun to have some hope. However, holder still has to have his little chit chat with the Judge. Remember Judge Carter in California.

  43. In watching trhe pipeline hearings on C span, I nearly PUKED. Listening to the childish drivel coming from the mouths of child NITWITS almost overwhelmed me. I was forced to turn the tv to another channel. I was able to withstand only 4 of them. I would suspect that they probably smelled just as bad as their appearance was, not to mention all of their UMMS,and AHHHS.

  44. If anyone looked at ALL the oil and gas pipelines that ran underground throughout this United States, they would be astonished. I don’t see how a new major pipeline running underground would create any problems that haven’t already been addressed.

    It’s funny, when the East coast citizens used to put out the notion “not in my backyard” when deciding whether or not to do on or offshore drilling in their states, those in Texas, who probably have the most agressive exploration, drilling, refining and transportation of their oil and gas resources had a saying……(referring to the Kennedy’s and their opposition to offshore drilling from their expansive and expensive coastline) “Let the Yankee Bast—rds FREEZE IN THE DARK”
    If we want to truly become energy independent, we need to explore and develop our own resources….Almost all rural landowners are affected in one way or another in doing their part to insure the energy we have is delivered to the rest of the country. Where do those environmentalists think they get the power to heat their homes and energize them. ?

  45. CABBY……

    Yes I guess your right…I am hopeful…three years and this is the first time the Usurper has been to court on MERITS!!!

    But, I will really feel assured, and know our legal system works when Obama and Company goes to jail for forgery, fraud, et al.!

    I wonder how MISSSSSSSSSSSSSS NANCY feels right now?

  46. CRAZY OLD COOT……

    I think Holder has already had his little chit-chat with this judge and it didn’t work.

    To me, on the surface, right now…it looks like we finally found the “ONE HONEST JUDGE” that was still left in America.

  47. The fact that the chief of the Criminal Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Arizona is refusing to testify before Congress regarding Operation Fast and Furious, the federal gun-running scandal that sent U.S. weapons to Mexico is a MAJOR issue. Read this story!

    Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/20/federal-official-in-arizona-to-plead-fifth-and-not-answer-questions-on-furious/#ixzz1k1gHkouL

  48. RMINNC…………………..
    The ball is now in Malahi’s Court. Will he cave like Carter did? We will soon see whether his golf balls are KOSHER or not.

  49. I have done some re thinking on the subpoena stuff relating to Orly in Hawaii. I tend to believe that what pourose was served by the subpoenas would have been BETTR served by out and out signed Court Orders. I believe the MMMMSSSS. LARD BUTT Nagamine would probably
    not have been quite so vocal. She does emanate body language that says she really thinks she is sooooo impooooortant. Typical of the LIBERAL LEFT.

  50. Addendum: Acid test of how important you are. Fill a glass with water,then stick your finger in it then quickly remove your finger. Then notice the HOLE IN THE WATER WHERE YOUR FINGER WAS.

  51. Although this is a step forward, this victory for Orly may not be all it’s cracked up to be by her. I mean, this might only result in Obama’s attorneys, or Obama hismelf, coming to court and presenting copies of the birth certificates that were already posted online. If indeed there is language in the Georgia law that actually requires a candidate to produce an original vaulted, long-form birth certificate, then we may have something. But if it does not, there will not be much new produced by way of this subpoena. If the language does exist requiring candidates to prove eligibility by way of a notarized vaulted, long-form birth certificate, Obama’s lawyers’ next move is to move it to the appelate level claiming this is extraordinary language and likely unconstitutional. And you know what will happen of course. Appeals courts will side with Obama. And I have no idea what will happen, in terms of actionability, regarding the other items Orly is subpoenaing.

    Anyway, this is great news but should be approached cautiously.

  52. …………..I’ll bet the translation of this third grade level test went right over the heads of the OBOTS. You know they are SO WELL EDUCATED,that they are totally NINCOMPOOPS.

  53. Gianni………………..
    If I remember correctly Orly’s requests DID INCLUDE the ORIGINAL BCwhich was ALLEGEDLY ISSUED by the hospital birth place. This would be right off of the MICROFLICH records and would be like a PHOTOSTATIC copy. Just as were those issued to the Nordyke twins. In 1961 that was the manner of reproducing any BC in Hawaii,whether it was a CERTIFICATION,or CERTIFICATE of LIVE BIRTH. Anything else will NOT SUFFICE, when the Nordyke copies are seen in evidence.

  54. Gianni…………..
    Further if Judge Malahi is thorough enough he WILL NOT MISS this fact. If he misses it then it is probable that he doesn’t really give a damn anyway. At trhat point I would be expecting some sort of antics on his part to do the same as Carter did in California.

  55. ………….but I am nonetheless praying that Malahi is where the BUCK stops.

  56. BYE BYE Time for my nap.

  57. Gianni……………….
    Before I shut down I would like to add…….Don’t look for Soetoro to show up in ANY courtroom. He would have to have his teleprompters, otherwise he couldn’t say anything meaningful.

  58. Gianni……………….
    I don’t think that Soetoro will go so far as to try to make the judge believe that the forged BC is the real McCoy. If he is caught at it then he faces possible charges of LYING under oath, and presenting false evidence. Slick Willy would have certainly been impeached had it not been for the efforts of people like Kennedy,Leahy,Durbin, and Schummer. They managed to save his ass,but having been censured he ended up a LAME DUCK anyway.

  59. oldsalt79 | January 20, 2012 at 2:43 pm |
    Gianni……………….
    Before I shut down I would like to add…….Don’t look for Soetoro to show up in ANY courtroom. He would have to have his teleprompters, otherwise he couldn’t say anything meaningful.
    *******************
    Tehehehe!! They probably should subpoena the teleprompters, too. We’ve got to have some laughs once in awhile.

  60. BYEBYE……

  61. Gianni | January 20, 2012 at 2:21 pm |
    Anyway, this is great news but should be approached cautiously.
    ***************************
    “Cautiously” is the right word. So far so good, but………
    Don’t we wish in the worst way that this was not the case?

  62. For a period of time I can go along on a more even keel, but then all of a sudden it all grabs me anew. It’s about time for another round of letters to some senators.

    After some thoughts were shared by a dear friend, I believe that one of the reasons Congress is so reluctant to get involved with the nitty-gritty is because of fear of the MEDIA. After all, we know what the MSM can do to anyone who gets to the heart of the matter – eligibility.

    Our elected officials delight in media accolades; they don’t so much like criticism and smears. They like to be liked and they want their constituency to think well of them. Therefore, in reality their desire for self aggrandizement is more important to them than the welfare of their country. This is shameful and politics at its lowest. Are there any real statesmen left?

  63. Wow! Some of the links within comments on the UM/WHI latest became missing/scrubbed, and then the whole link became an “Internet Explorer” cannot link to/site may be dangerous to your computer, etc.

  64. Cabby – AZ | January 20, 2012 at 2:51 pm | 7 of the 8 Missing Iowa Precincts Voted Against Romney in 2008

    ==========================
    Very interesting! Looks like we may need to start a prayer chain to cover next critical months for the sake of the life of our country….and the next generations.

  65. observer | January 20, 2012 at 4:47 pm |
    Very interesting! Looks like we may need to start a prayer chain to cover next critical months for the sake of the life of our country….and the next generations.
    *********************
    Agreed! Just got this link via e-mail re. S.C. voter registration:

    http://cnsnews.com/blog/eric-scheiner/south-carolina-primary-may-wake-dead

    (quote)
    According to South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson, the State Election Commission reported 239,000 people were registered to vote without photo ID. Through an audit by the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles it was discovered 37,000 on the list were deceased and 96,000 had moved to other states.
    Despite that news, Democrats have been critical of the South Carolina voter ID law as well as voter ID efforts in other states.
    ***********************
    In other words, more than half of that group (without photo ID) would be fertile ground for voter fraud. A powder keg waiting to go off.

  66. Good for Georgia and Orly. Wonder if Obama’s handlers have had the forgery dept. working overtime to get all those documents in order just the way they want them. I don’t believe for a minute that they haven’t prepared for this eventuality and have been busily getting the ‘proper’ docs ready. Question is, how redacted will they be—how much blacked out with the excuse it will be harmful to national security or something? Should be very interesting how far this is ‘allowed’ to proceed before the judge gets his ‘orders’ to cease and desist or else. Hope the judge has some body guards and a whole lot of prayers protecting him and giving him the courage to go forward towards the truth.

  67. Well, since we’re dealing with a pResident who makes up law as he goes along to favor himself because in his mind he is really the emperor, he just won’t show and have his “justice dept” give a decision that he cannot be forced to appear for various and sundry blah blah reasons. It’ll just be a continuation of how he’s completely oblivious to the law….and then he’ll probably follow that up by suing the state. Don’t put it past the regime.

  68. Can you hear those distant chants getting louder and louder….GA is ….the magic cure word that begins with an r!

  69. Courtesy of another blogger, here is something we should all be aware of:

    Fox News Hires Soros-funded Activist

    http://www.trevorloudon.com/2012/01/fox-news-hires-soros-funded-activist/

  70. Pat 1789 | January 20, 2012 at 6:13 pm |
    Interesting article, Pat, and one which has information worth considering.

  71. A few nights ago, while we were talking about Newt’s ex wife, I made a mention how the media suppressed several stories during the 2008 campaign, especially the acorn whistleblower Anita Montcrief and the LA times film and associated story of Obama at Rashid Khalidi’ farewell dinner.

    An article today at American thinker discusses the Rashid Khalidi story at length….Looks like we might want to create a movement to pressure them to release the video.
    Maybe the dumbed down electorate will wake up and start connecting the dots.
    http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/01/a_gop_candidates_bitter_ex-wife_receives_more_coverage_than_a_video_of_obama_dining_with_terrorist_s.html

  72. Just Thinking Again……

    What will happen if Obummer simply ignores Judge Malihi’s court order and does nothing or maybe, just maybe, issue an EO?

    The Worst is Yet to Come!

  73. Email I got from Orly Taitz, I thought may be of interest.

    I won!!! I won!!! I won!!! Judge Malihi ruled in my favor. Obama’s motion to quash my subpoena is denied! He has to appear at trial and present all the documents that I demanded to produce in my subpoena!

    Posted on | January 20, 2012 | No Comments

    It has been 3 years of 24/7/365 fight. I was defamed, viciously maligned by so many Obots (Obama bots), pro-Obama media thugs, by a few corrupt officials and judges. Recently even people, who claimed to be on my side turned sides and viciously defamed me and attacked me. Among them were Arlen Williams, Dean Haskins, owner of a blog Birther Summit, Ben Nelson-owner of a blog Birther Report or ObamaReleaseYourRecords, Helen Tansey -owner of a blog art2superpac and even attorneys, who should’ve had some professional ethics. Attorneys Gary Kreep and Philip Berg filed insane pleadings, saying that I tried to hire a hit man to kill Lisa Liberi, legal assistant of attorney Berg and kidnap children of a web master Lisa Ostella. It has been 3 years of total nightmare, these people were like a pack of wild dogs attacking me and coming up with each and every accusation in the book. Now I am vindicated. My legal action is with merit. We are going to trial on January 26, 2012. I issued subpoenas. Barack Obama through his attorney Michael Jablonski filed a motion to quash my subpoena and all the other subpoenas. I was attacked yet again in this motion. Judge Malihi just issued an order. Motion to quash my subpoena was denied. Barack Obama, President of the United States will have to appear in court on January 26 and comply with my subpoena and produce all the documents, that I demanded. Interesting, that two other attorneys are representing plaintiffs on similar matters: Van Irion and Mark Hatfield. They could have an opportunity to examine Obama with me, however either because I was maligned so badly or because they were scared to press the most explosive charges, these attorneys filed motions for their cases to be severed from my case. Their motions were granted. Irion’s case will be heard first. He stated on the record, that his case will take only 10 minutes and will be limited to ascertainment if Obama is legitimate based on the precedent of Minor v Happerset. Obama will not be answering any of his questions. Second will be a case presented by attorney Hatfield. He, also, severed his case and did not issue any subpoenas. In his motion to sever he stated that he did not want to be joined in the same complaint with me, because he did not want to be part of a case, where I brought forward allegations of elections fraud and social security fraud committed by Barack Obama. Hatfield was saying that he was afraid that his clients will be prejudiced by such explosive allegations. Yesterday, after I filed an opposition to motion to quash, attorney Hatfield tried to follow suit by filing a notice to appear, however notice does not have as much of a force as a subpoena and I do not believe Obama will be complying with a notice, particularly since Hatfield’s complaint does not entail the same charges as mine. My case will be heard third. My case will not be limited to definition of natural born based on a case Minor v Happersett. I will be also presenting a case, showing that elections fraud was committed by Barack Obama, that he is using a forged birth certificate, stolen or fraudulently obtained Social Security number and that there is no evidence to believe that the last name he is using is legally his, due to the fact, that in his mother’s passport he goes under the name Soebarkah and in his school registration in Indonesia he went by the last name Soetoro. There is no evidence of legal change of name.

    I wanted to thank people who helped me along the way with donations, who did not stick a knife in my back, like the ones mentioned before. I am asking my supporters to donate to this work, as I am paying for airfare and hotel of witnesses and a number of other expenses. Also, if you are a CA Republican please, download my nomination for the US Senate and sign and circulate it.

    nomination papers

    Make no mistake about it. This is the beginning of Watergate2 or ObamaForgeryGate. I believe this is the second time in the U.S. history a sitting President is ordered to comply with a subpoena, and produce documents, which might eventually bring criminal charges to the President and a number of high ranking individuals.

    I feel extremely proud to be a part of this historic moment. I guess an American dream is still alive, as this subpoena was issued by an immigrant, who was raised in a communist dictatorship of the Soviet Union and came here with one suitcase with a couple of dresses, who had to study English, to study law at night, while working as a dentist and raising a family with 3 children. Only in America is this possible.

    Humbly,

    Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

  74. hapnHal | January 20, 2012 at 7:52 pm |

    Just Thinking Again……

    What will happen if Obummer simply ignores Judge Malihi’s court order and does nothing or maybe, just maybe, issue an EO?

    The Worst is Yet to Come!
    ************************************
    hapnHal, If this judge sticks to his guns, he can keep the ineligible Obama off of the ballot in Georgia, that should snowball into many States, once people see he doesn’t qualify to be on the ballot in Georgia.

    I am going to stock up on popcorn, this is going to be good. I wonder how long it will be before this is brought up on the campaign trail among the Repubs.

  75. Please release my comment at 8:35pm from moderation so the people can read it.

    What does moderation have to do with free speech?

  76. One minute before the Court of Judge Malihi ended it’s business on Friday, 20 Jan 2012, Orley Taitz requested the judge sign a “letter of regatory” from the State of Georgia to the judge in the State of Hawaii demanding that Lorette Fuddy be issued a subpoena to attend the judicial hearing on Obama’s right to be on the State of Georgia’s presidential ballot. The hearing is scheduled for the 26th of Jan in Alanta Ga.

    The “letter of regatory” is a pretty strong tool and is only used when a regular subpoena is not honored. The “letter of regatory” also demands Fuddy bring with her Obama’s original birth certificate, and the microfische film from which it was taken.

    I don’t know about anyone else on here, but I sure wouldn’t want to get on the wrong side of Orley Tatiz………

    Taitz is like a pissed-off little bull dog…what she latches on to, she won’t let go, especially when she knows she’s right……you gotta give this little lady credit. She has been one big pain in Obama’s rear end for the past three years. She has maintained a steady course in spite of all the knock-downs she has encountered.

    I wonder how many of us would have had the courage to stay the course, stand and fight the good fight?.

    If anyone deserves to win, it’s Orly Taitz. The immigrant lady from Russia who knows the price of freedom from her first hand experience.

    Now the ball is back in the Hawaiian court.

    It will be very interesting to see if the Hawaiian judge continue to refuse this order in spite of the fact that Hawaiian laws state the State of Georgia has a right to demand this information. !!!

  77. rminnc | January 20, 2012 at 9:26 pm |

    If anyone deserves to win, it’s Orly Taitz. The immigrant lady from Russia who knows the price of freedom from her first hand experience.
    *************************
    I truly believe she wants to preserve our country for her children’s sake.

    This is part of my post from 8:35pm that is held in moderation.

    Orly Taitz says in an email I received.

    “I feel extremely proud to be a part of this historic moment. I guess an American dream is still alive, as this subpoena was issued by an immigrant, who was raised in a communist dictatorship of the Soviet Union and came here with one suitcase with a couple of dresses, who had to study English, to study law at night, while working as a dentist and raising a family with 3 children. Only in America is this possible.”

    Humbly,

    Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

  78. A Crazy Old Coot

    hapnHal | January 20, 2012 at 7:52 pm |
    Just Thinking Again……
    What will happen if Obummer simply ignores Judge Malihi’s court order and does nothing or maybe, just maybe, issue an EO?
    The Worst is Yet to Come!
    //////////////////////////////
    If he ignores the court order, the judge “can” prevent him from being on the ballot in GA. This is only one state, but other states have cases pending and would wonder why obama did not answer the court order. One state at a time.

    Just the opinion of a dumb ole (Natural Born Citizen) country boy.

  79. bob strauss | January 20, 2012 at 8:35 pm |

    Email I got from Orly Taitz, I thought may be of interest.

    I won!!! I won!!! I won!!! Judge Malihi ruled in my favor. Obama’s motion to quash my subpoena is denied! He has to appear at trial and present all the documents that I demanded to produce in my subpoena!

    I feel extremely proud to be a part of this historic moment. I guess an American dream is still alive, as this subpoena was issued by an immigrant, who was raised in a communist dictatorship of the Soviet Union and came here with one suitcase with a couple of dresses, who had to study English, to study law at night, while working as a dentist and raising a family with 3 children. Only in America is this possible.

    Humbly,

    Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
    ***********************************************************************************
    I set up my blog at the end of August 2008. One of the first posts instructed citizens, the only way to keep Obama’s name off the ballot if he takes the D nomination; was to challenge his eligibility in those states that require candidate eligibility to appear on the ballot.
    http://jbjd.org/2008/08/31/challenging-bo%E2%80%99s-eligibility-to-get-onto-the-general-election-ballot-as-the-democratic-candidate-for-potus/

    GA is one of those states. And, I know that Orly has known since back in 2008 that GA is one of those states because, at that time, I told her. That is, I published a memo in which I proposed there has been 2 ways to keep Obama out of the WH. First, of course, was the ballot challenge; and I specifically mentioned GA.

    For example, here is the requirement to get onto the general election ballot in the State of GA, under the Official Code of GA Annotated (O.C.G.A.), §21-2-5, Qualifications of candidates for federal and state office; determination of qualifications. “Every candidate for federal and state office who is certified by the state executive committee of a political party … shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.” (Note: President, U.S. Senator, or U.S. Representative are federal offices.) This means that, according to GA law, when the state Party chair submits the Party nominee to the Secretary of State (“S of S”) to be put onto the general election ballot, that nominee must be eligible for the office sought. But there is no corresponding GA law that says the S of S receiving this paperwork from the state Party chair must verify this eligibility. Under that same law, the State of GA set up a mechanism by which voters may file a challenge with the S of S questioning the eligibility of a candidate to appear on the ballot; and for the S of S to initiate such a challenge on her own. “The Secretary of State upon his or her own motion may challenge the qualifications of any candidate at any time prior to the election of such candidate.” But again, the operative word here is “may.” In other words, even in a state like GA, one of the few states with laws that provide for a mechanism for voters to challenge a candidate’s eligibility to get onto the general election ballot, no law requires the state to investigate the candidate based on that challenge. (Notice that technically, even GA law does not confer power on the S of S to determine whether any candidate is eligible for the office sought but only to determine this: whether he is eligible by virtue of satisfying the requirements of the office sought to get onto the general election ballot.)

    http://jbjd.org/2008/11/30/find-out-whether-barack-obama-is-a-natural-born-citizen-as-required-under-article-ii-of-the-us-constitution-and-stop-the-electoral-college-from-voting-for-him-if-he-is-not/

    It was this memo which first attracted Orly’s attention to my work, and triggered our short-lived collaboration, during which time I drafted the military complaint; and intervened at the request of a soldier who had been trying unsuccessfully to get her to withdraw the waiver he signed to join that complaint. .

    So, more than 3 wasted years and countless squandered dollars in contributions and who knows how many frequent flyer miles later; she decided to take my advice and challenge the qualifications of a candidate for office in a state that only allows to be printed on the ballot the names of those candidates qualified for the job. And, given this legal route of redress, the court has endorsed her methodology.

    And, based on this demonstrated pattern of out-of-control spending and failure to heed sound legal advice; evidently, she now feels worthy of soliciting your support for the U.S. Senate.

    “Humbly”? Yeah, right.

  80. (I meant to post this P.S. on my previous comment.)

    P.S. Of course, this in no way means, I agree with either the substantive case she has brought or, her ‘take’ on the (seeming) success of her case. In the end, she will fail in this effort as always. Please, keep in mind, in real life logic, failing to quash Plaintiff’s requested subpoena for Defendant to appear is not the same as Ordering Defendant to Appear, especially in this case, where the judge specifically wrote, Defendant had merely failed to cite to any sound legal reason the subpoena should not be allowed.

  81. Wonder why Sharon Rondeau’s post & email blog is down?

  82. jbjd | January 20, 2012 at 11:18 pm |

    (I meant to post this P.S. on my previous comment.)

    P.S. Of course, this in no way means, I agree with either the substantive case she has brought or, her ‘take’ on the (seeming) success of her case. In the end, she will fail in this effort as always. Please, keep in mind, in real life logic, failing to quash Plaintiff’s requested subpoena for Defendant to appear is not the same as Ordering Defendant to Appear, especially in this case, where the judge specifically wrote, Defendant had merely failed to cite to any sound legal reason the subpoena should not be allowed.
    *******************************
    jbjd, I sure hope something will come of this effort in GA, to keep Obama off of the ballot. I believe that if the truth were known, I doubt that Obama is even a Citizen of this country, and all the forgeries, lies, and obfuscation, does not make him one, and borrow a phrase from you. On what basis did the democrat national party determine Obama was eligible for the office of President?

  83. bob strauss | January 20, 2012 at 11:46 pm |

    jbjd | January 20, 2012 at 11:18 pm |

    (I meant to post this P.S. on my previous comment.)
    ************************************************************************
    Bob, I absolutely agree, a correctly framed ballot challenge can be successful. SC would have been the easiest state in which to launch such a challenge, because as I have been writing for a couple of years now, primary candidates in that state are submitted to the election commission by the state party, which also certifies explicitly, in writing, the candidates are qualified for the job. In other words, there, the question to the court would have been, the party has failed to provide a basis for such certification. (Recall that, in SC, the then party treasurer hand-delivered the primary names to the election commission, which refused to accept the list because it lacked that certification. So, she whipped out her pen and, on the spot, certified the candidates’ qualification!) http://jbjd.org/2009/10/10/if-it-looks-like-a-duck/

    P.S. It’s still not too late to question the submission of his name as the D party nominee, to the general election ballot in that state!

  84. “Mike Huckabee Challenge to Romney on Tax Returns: Tell Obama To Release His College Transcripts And Admissions Records To Prove No Foreign-Student Loans”

    [video at link]

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/mike-huckabee-challenge-to-romney-tell.html

  85. RMINNC…………………
    It sounds as though INCH BY INCH Orley is gaining ground. That by the way is often HOW WARS ARE WON. You can do it MILE by mile, FOOT BY FOOT, or inch by inch. Three cheers for Orly JUST FOR STAYING in the action! She has had my support for quite a while ,and I now believe that she will be getting much more support since there has been positive forward movement accomplished. I only hope that now she is going to need ALL the HELP she can MUSTER. She above all needs thoroughly trained staff. There you go JBJD here is your chance to accomplish a historic action.

  86. I am composing a special letter to all the VFW posts in our state, as well as other states making all of this known and the most recent progress of Orly. Hopefully some of them will see fit to make contributions. I have provided both her California postal address,and her website as well. Lets see what our vets think!

  87. The burden of PROVING must be shifted to the POTUS instead of the plaintiff having to prove the allegations. I think that the state by state ballot challenges are the correct way to bring such a shift.

  88. oldsalt79 | January 21, 2012 at 1:49 am |

    I am composing a special letter to all the VFW posts in our state, as well as other states making all of this known and the most recent progress of Orly. Hopefully some of them will see fit to make contributions. I have provided both her California postal address,and her website as well. Lets see what our vets think!
    ***************************************************************************************
    You just don’t get it.

    The vet who contacted me had been trying to get Orly to destroy the waiver he had signed, agreeing to join on to the military complaint. Having re-read the release, he realized, he did not agree with the extreme sentiments she had expressed and was quite concerned that he was exposing himself to serious legal liability. I had already objected to the wording in her release. Leo also urged her to recall that release on the grounds of this inflammatory language. Further, I had urged that only National Guard troops subject to recall, join the suit, because until called up, they were not subject to the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice) and could not be disciplined for questioning Obama’s Constitutional eligibility. She chose to use other Plaintiffs. (She and I seldom agreed on anything.) Anyway, he asked for my help getting through to her. I contacted her; and she quite flippantly and, with an air of disgust, replied, ‘What does he want now?’ I hit the roof. He was the Plaintiff, not her; and he was the member of the military in jeopardy. I got her to pull his release; and that’s the last time we collaborated on anything.

    That you would solicit money for this charlatan evidences a blind faith not sustained by the record.

  89. CabbyAZ……………..
    Thanks for the info regarding the audit of the voting base in SC. A friend of mine here in Ft Wayne was going to do this on his own. But coming from the people at state level,it will probably be looked upon as the truth. That audit does a lot of things with one shot. Most importantly it will block the LIBERAL CRIMINALS from using the votes of DEAD PEOPLE, and those who moved out of state. Really great news. Now all we have to do is ask the other states to do the same audit,if they havn’t yet already done so.

  90. Goodnight all……….I will indeed sleep a little better tonight!

  91. I am in moderation at 01:49 AM.

  92. jbjd……………………..
    Have you researched Georgia election law sufficiently enough to state specifically if Soetoro must be determined to be Constitutionally eligible by the Secretary of State, of Georgia. It would seem that if he is LEGALLY PROVEN to be ineligible in Georgia this would carry enough justification for other states to convene State level Grand Juries. Do you see such a possibility?

  93. As was apparently the case in Hawaii the Certification of eligibility was RE WRITTEN soas to exclude the wording “Constitutionally eligible”. I am betting that certified copies of this COE form are going to be part of the evidence offerred by Orly. It would seem that if this form is publically shown in every state it would soon get back to Hawaii and I am betting that the entire state government goes into full coverup mode. Schatt, and BOSS HOGG might even try to run to another state like the Wisconsin Democrats did when things got HAIRY. Gonna get interesting, maybe even HELLISH for the HAWAII DNC

  94. They can run but they CANNOT hide! I am praying very hard that discovery will happen. Remember what happened in Judge Carter’s Court? Like everyone I am NOT going to hold my breath. But one thing that Soetoro cannot change is WHAT HAS ALREADY OCCURRED. I am sure that his official WORDSMITHS will attempt to alter the meaning of everything, but he CANNOT change the facts. He MUST show a PHOTOSTATIC COPY of his ALLEGED long form made directly from the MICROFILM RECORD……..that is if there is a microfilm copy of his BC…..which I seriously doubt. The copy must show everything that the Nordyke twins copies showed. HEY SOETORO, TIME TO ANTE UP!

  95. BAD BOY, BAD BOY WATCHA GONNA DO WHEN THEY COME FOR YOU? WATCHA GONNA SAY…. WHO YA GONNA PAY?

  96. bye bye FOR NOW!

  97. Mornin folks!

    This is interesting:

    Ron Paul: A Prophet in His Own Time
    January 20th, 2012 by Pat Buchanan

    Ron Paul’s Portfolio…Planning For Disaster?‏

    http://catholicexchange.com/2012/01/20/141063/

  98. jbjd | January 21, 2012 at 2:18 am |

    “That you would solicit money for this charlatan evidences a blind faith not sustained by the record.”
    ————————————————————————————-
    jbjd is right

  99. oldsalt79 | January 21, 2012 at 9:16 am |

    As was apparently the case in Hawaii the Certification of eligibility was RE WRITTEN soas to exclude the wording “Constitutionally eligible”.
    *********************************************************************************
    This is a lie promulgated by someone who stole information from my blog without bothering even to read what he had stolen. Every Certification which contains the words “duly nominated” implicitly said, he was Constitutionally qualified for the job. Every Certification which explicitly contained wording of such eligibility, did so because of particular state laws requiring such language of eligibility, such as HI and SC. For example, see http://jbjd.org/2010/10/12/back-up-birthers/

  100. observer | January 21, 2012 at 9:42 am |

    I agree, good article.

  101. Cabby – AZ | January 20, 2012 at 10:37 pm |
    Third installment of Insider Report:
    —————————————————————————————-

    I think this guy just makes this stuff up.

  102. http://marathonpundit.blogspot.com/2012/01/exclusive-obama-crony-rezko-begins.html

    Good Morning All: Courtesy of “Bill Baars West Side”and “Marathon Pundit”, Tony Rezko is moving into his new home…

  103. It seems that the Judge is giving hints to just what info in the law is necessary to fight any further excuses for Obama either not appearing or not willing to answer subpoenas:

    Defendant’s motion suggests that no President should be compelled to attend a Court hearing. This may be correct. But Defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is “unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony…[is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party’s preparation or presentation in the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced…

  104. P.S. I hope Orly is ready with her own legal info to counter anything brought by O’s lawyer and that she does not just reply with emotional arguments at this point….esp. at this first possible opening with an apparently reasonable judge.

  105. “This may be correct. But Defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is “unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony…[is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party’s preparation or presentation in the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced…”
    —————————————————————————————————–

    The D-RAT lawyer must not be too sharp, 2 minutes and a internet search would have produced Jones V Clinton.

  106. Thanks all for continuing to fight for truth and Justice. Stay safe, God Bless America.

  107. The point about the war on religion and the Church that Gingrich was making:

    “In effect, the president is saying we have a year to figure out how to violate our consciences,” the cardinal-designate said in a separate statement. “To force American citizens to choose between violating their consciences and forgoing their health care is literally unconscionable. It is as much an attack on access to health care as on religious freedom. Historically this represents a challenge and a compromise of our religious liberty.”

    http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1200263.htm

  108. Ii wonder if Lamecherry morphed into ulsterman

  109. Hey, on those school records that are in the batch of records attempting to be gotten – supposedly for citizen vs foreign student admission info – would the SSN O was using at the time be there as well? As many records containing a SSN as possible might demonstrate even different SSNs having been used beyond the one being concentrated on that didn’t get a match from e-verify. You know that the reason for Occidental to immediately panic when such records were requested and go immediately to their attys who were affiliated with O’s had to be that there was something they knew would send off public alarms there. And…all those “scholarships”….based on what exactly when the guy admitted to his bad grades and drug use in high school.

  110. Pat 1789 | January 21, 2012 at 10:53 am |

    http://www.cbsatlanta.com/story/16567672/ga-judge-orders-president-to-appear
    **************************************************************************************
    Yes; a so-called news site posted this incorrect ‘news.’ Perhaps the writer, reading the court’s decision not to grant Defendant Obama’s Motion to Quash Plaintiff’s subpoena to appear; merely misinterpreted the court’s decision. Or, maybe, he was relying on Orly’s misinterpretation of that same decision. Either way, the interpretation and, therefore, the news, is wrong.

  111. Cabby – AZ,
    Thanks for posting the third installment from the Insider.

    It seems that since BO can’t run on his record to date, that the D-rats have resurrected ACORN, and are planning massive voter fraud, again:
    http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-release/new-records-by-judicial-watch-show-obama-white-house-coordination-with-department-of-justice

    RW

  112. Fox NEWS vs. Obama????

    VERY IMPORTANT–SUNDAY NIGHT

    This Coming Sunday– Set Your DVR for the Fox News channel at 9:00 PM
    eastern. Maybe this is why the White House has been discounting FOX.
    Sounds like this could be history in the making – someone may go down
    – either Obama or Fox News. It may be that Fox has been withholding
    this information back due to the sensitivity of it and out of
    courtesy. But, Obama has taken on Fox and it appears they are ready to
    spill the ugly beans of truth about the background of this individual
    who has had an extremely radical past. This Sunday, Fox News is going
    to air a very important documentary about Barack Obama, Sunday night
    at 9P.M. Eastern. The report will go back to Obama’s earlier days,
    showing even then his close ties to radical Marxist professors,
    friends, spiritual advisers, etc. It will also reveal details about
    his ties to Rev. Wright for 20+ years, i.e., how he was participating
    with this man, and not for the reasons he stated. The report has
    uncovered more of Obama’s radical past and we will see things that no
    one in the media is willing to put out there. It will be a segment to
    remember. Mark your calendar and pass this on to everyone you know:
    Sunday night, 8 PM CT; 9 PM ET. Democrat or Republican, this report
    will open your eyes to how YOUR country is being sold down the road to
    Totalitarian Socialism. If you care about the direction of our
    country, pass this notice on to everyone you know

  113. I wonder if this is a new Fox special or the same one they have shown several times over the last 2 years.

  114. RW | January 21, 2012 at 12:22 pm |

    When I clicked on link it says OUT OF ORDER….page cannot be found.

  115. jbjd………………
    To each his own!

  116. “A thing about BLIND FAITH”…………..
    While a whole lot of Americans (millions) didn’t know much about the mechanics of WAR,or perhaps even the the WHY of war, but one thing is certain they knew exactly after December 7,1941 what it was, and from that point on America proceeded to beat the HELL OUT OF two enemies ………on BLIND FAITH. PURE,unadulterated, and DOCUMENTED FACT. I DO GET IT. It is our childish overeducated people who DON’T GET IT.

  117. Like millions of other vets, we do get it. But even with vets, active military, or reserve military, there are always a very small percentage who CHANGE THEIR MINDS, and for a HOST of reasons as well. While I congratulate ORLY for doing what she BELIEVES in, she might have been a trifle inexperienced as a LAWYER. But so were all of our soldiers who fought in past wars. She is fighting a war against a well financed, entrenched,and highly trained enemy who could easily take the US down the DRAIN. That is why I am asking all of the VFW organisations to contribute to Orly. A person who would actively try to make others believe that Orly will fail are in my opinion those who themselves might be questionable. Wordsmiths try very hard to make people think that LEFT is really RIGHT

  118. Patriot4Usa………………
    My,my how quickly people FORGET……..perhaps CONVENIENTLY? I seem to remember a SLIMEY BASTARD who said GOD DAMN AMERICA, and I also remember a FEMALE VIP qwho said “FOR THE FIRST TIME I am PROUD” …….what the hell was all of that? Then I remember sombody who stated that he had been in 57 states…..Came from a HARVARD GRAD…….Must have been playing with himself instead of paying attention to his classes. Many children in the 1st grade know how many states there are in the union. But who am I to judge this person who was elected by people who SUPPOSEDLY knew that there was only 50 states. Yet these people voted for the usurper. Really doesn’t say much for their level of intelligence either

  119. jbjd……………
    Then perhaps you should take a look at the Certification that MMMSSSS. Pelosi signed. It along with the standard form (which includes the Constitutional wording) have both been posted on the internet. Your are TOO LATE to stop that one, millions have already examined the two documents, and NOW KNOW that the Hawaii DNC, specifically Mr.Schatt who is now Lt. Governor. Further I believe that this was the real reason why Soetoro suddenly flew to Hawaii…..because they were not going to certify him as eligible under the Constitution…….so they certified his as eligible by the standards of the Hawaii DNC instead………and Speaker Pelosi signed it. You need to closely examine both documents. I did, and as a former TYPSETTER do know what I read.

  120. Pingback: Obama GA ballot challenge, Natural born citizen status, Judge Michael Malihi, Why did Obama refuse matching funds in 2008?, Part 3, Citizen Wells FEC FOIA, FEC bias? | Citizen WElls

  121. Pingback: Obama GA ballot challenge, Natural born citizen status, Judge Michael Malihi, Why did Obama refuse matching funds in 2008?, Part 3, Citizen Wells FEC FOIA, FEC bias? | Citizen WElls

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s