Obama GA ballot challenge, FEC Hassan opinion quotes Natural born citizen requirement, Judge Michael Malihi, Why did Obama refuse matching funds in 2008?, Part 5, Fec US Constitution presidential eligibility

Obama GA ballot challenge, FEC Hassan opinion quotes Natural born citizen requirement, Judge Michael Malihi, Why did Obama refuse matching funds in 2008?, Part 5, Fec US Constitution presidential eligibility

“I am certain that the devil is watching Barack Obama and taking notes.”…Citizen Wells

“Why did Obama employ Robert Bauer of Perkins Coie, to request an advisory opinion on FEC matching funds that he was not eligible for?”…Citizen Wells

“Why is Obama now employing private attorneys to keep his name on state ballots, despite compelling evidence that he is not a natural born citizen?…Citizen Wells

WHY DID OBAMA REFUSE MATCHING FUNDS IN 2008?

PART 5

FEC Hassan opinion quotes Natural born citizen requirement

On July 5, 2011, Abdul Hassan, an attorney from NY, submitted a request for an advisory opinion from the FEC. Hassan acknowledged that he was a naturalized citizen and not a natural born citizen. Abdul Hassan posed the following questions:

“1. Whether, as a naturalized American citizen, I am included in the meaning of
“candidate” or “person” or “individual” running for President as used in the Federal Election Campaign Act (“FECA”)?

2. Whether, as a naturalized American citizen, I am prohibited from receiving matching funds under the FECA?

3. Whether, as a naturalized American citizen, I would be in violation of 2 USC §
441h(b) ifi solicit and/or receive presidential campaign contributions?

4. Whether, in light of the steps I have taken in my presidential run as outlined above, I am subject to the expenditure, contribution and record-keeping requirements of FECA and the regulations thereunder? (Note: I have not yet crossed the $5,000 threshold that triggers the registration and reporting requirements – it is therefore important that I receive an answer before
these requirements are triggered.).”

http://www.scribd.com/document_downloads/63383043?extension=pdf

The FEC responded with an Advisory Opinion on September 2, 2011.

Here are some interesting exerpts:
“We are responding to your advisory opinion request concerning the application of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (the “Act”), the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act, as amended, and Commission regulations to your campaign for President of the United States, given your status as a naturalized citizen.

The Commission concludes that the Act does not prohibit Mr. Hassan, a
naturalized citizen, from becoming a “candidate” as that term is defined under the Act. However, Mr. Hassan will not be eligible to receive Federal matching funds under the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act.”
“Mr. Hassan indicates that he satisfies all of the constitutional requirements for
serving as President, except the natural born citizen requirement in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution. 1″
“2. As a naturalized American citizen, is Mr. Hassan eligible to receive
presidential matching funds under the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act?”
“No, as a naturalized American citizen, Mr. Hassan is not eligible to receive
presidential matching funds under the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act (“Matching Payment Act”).

The United States Constitution provides that “[n]o Person except a natural born
Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President . . . .” U.S. Const. art. II, sec. 1, cl. 5.”
“2 The Act does not contain separate definitions for candidates for different Federal offices. The Constitution’s “natural born Citizen” provision only pertains to “the Office of President.” U.S. Const., art. II, sec. 1, cl. 5.
3 Mr. Hassan’s status as a “candidate” under the Act does not in any way affect whether Mr. Hassan will be eligible to appear on State ballots or to be a candidate under various State laws. In fact, it is the Commission’s understanding that some State ballot access laws provide that a person cannot appear on the
ballot or be considered a candidate unless the person will be qualified for the office he or she purports to seek.”
“Although the Matching Payment Act does not specifically address the citizenship requirement for serving as President, it sets forth the eligibility requirements to receive matching funds. See 26 U.S.C. 9033; 11 CFR 9033.2. See also, e.g., Advisory Opinion 1996-07 (Browne for President) (describing the steps a candidate must take to become eligible for matching funds). These provisions collectively reflect Congressional intent to ensure that U.S. Treasury funds in the form of matching funds are only paid to eligible candidates. 5″
“The Commission is charged under the Matching Payment Act with administering the Federal matching funds program and has some discretion when certifying eligibility for matching funds. While the Commission may not “appraise candidates’ good faith, honesty, probity or general reliability when reviewing the agreements and other forwardlooking commitments required” by the Matching Payment Act, see LaRouche v. FEC, 996 F.2d 1263, 1269 (D.C. Cir. 1993), situations may exist in which, “without assessment of subjective candidate intent, the Commission might conceivably withhold funds despite
formal compliance with the statutorily expressed criteria.” Id. Clear and self-avowed constitutional ineligibility for office is one of the few instances where the Commission’s exercise of its discretion to withhold funds is appropriate.”

http://saos.nictusa.com/aodocs/AO%202011-15.pdf

Observations

The FEC refers to the US Constitition requirement for the presidency, natural born citizen.

The FEC notes the distinction between a natural born citizen and naturalized citizen.

The Fec states that a naturalized citizen is not eligible for the presidency.

The FEC states that only a natural born citizen may receive presidential matching funds.

The FEC acknowledges that although they do not have the authority to keep ineligible candidates off of ballots, some of the states do.

“3 Mr. Hassan’s status as a “candidate” under the Act does not in any way affect whether Mr. Hassan will be  eligible to appear on State ballots or to be a candidate under various State laws. In fact, it is the Commission’s understanding that some State ballot access laws provide that a person cannot appear on the
ballot or be considered a candidate unless the person will be qualified for the office he or she purports to seek.”

Hence the GA and other state ballot challenges to Obama.

Conclusions

The FEC still acknowledges the US Constitution.

However, in 2007 when Robert Bauer of Perkins Coie submitted an advisory opinion request on behalf of Barack Obama to keep open the option for presidential matching funds, Bauer knew that Obama was not a natural born citizen. Ellen Weintraub, on the FEC committee that responded with an advisory opinion in the affirmative for Obama, was a former Perkins Coie staff member. Fraud was committed by Obama and Bauer and one has to question the ethics of Weintraub’s involvement.

The FEC acknowledges with these statements:

“Although the Matching Payment Act does not specifically address the citizenship requirement for serving as President, it sets forth the eligibility requirements to receive matching funds. See 26 U.S.C. 9033; 11 CFR 9033.2. See also, e.g., Advisory Opinion 1996-07 (Browne for President) (describing the steps a candidate must take to become eligible for matching funds). These provisions collectively reflect Congressional intent to ensure that U.S. Treasury funds in the form of matching funds are only paid to eligible candidates. 5″

“The Commission is charged under the Matching Payment Act with administering the Federal matching funds program and has some discretion when certifying eligibility for matching funds. While the Commission may not “appraise candidates’ good faith, honesty, probity or general reliability when reviewing the agreements and other forwardlooking commitments required” by the Matching Payment Act, see LaRouche v. FEC, 996 F.2d 1263, 1269 (D.C. Cir. 1993), situations may exist in which, “without assessment of subjective candidate intent, the Commission might conceivably withhold funds despite
formal compliance with the statutorily expressed criteria.” Id. Clear and self-avowed constitutional ineligibility for office is one of the few instances where the Commission’s exercise of its discretion to withhold funds is appropriate.”

that there are eligibility requirements for receiving presidential matching funds and that the FEC is charged with administering these funds. It is clear
that the FEC should always require proof of eligibility. It should have done so in 2007. We know there was inherent bias in 2007 (see part 4 of this series).

Court cases also clarify the powers given to the FEC. The FEC has more power than they have alluded to.

See Doug Teper, et al V. Zell Miller, et al, April 24, 1996.

http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/82/82.F3d.989.96-8147.html

 

About these ads

183 responses to “Obama GA ballot challenge, FEC Hassan opinion quotes Natural born citizen requirement, Judge Michael Malihi, Why did Obama refuse matching funds in 2008?, Part 5, Fec US Constitution presidential eligibility

  1. This is way off topic…but interesting and frightening developments are happening as we speak and not much hype with the MSM…Hmmmm.

    The hint at Davos that capitalism has reached its usefullness and needs to go…..the head of the IMF shouting warnings across Europe…world economy in danger zone..

    Now we have US embasy closings in Syria, a build up of warships at the Strait of Hormuz and now reports today of a US commando team operating near Iran.

    Didn’t we just pull our troops from Iraq and are slowing leaving Afghanistan. Why would we leave that area defenseless

    from Iranian operatives? Could it be that our next deployment will be Iran?

    Call me cynical, but are we not “wagging the dog” in a very contentious presidential election year?

    Under ordinary circumstances, Obama cannot win re-election, unless of course, the Eurozone collapses

    and we find ouselves in another war. I think historically, the electorate has always reelected

    an incumbent president when we are at war.

    I think we must remain vigilant and keep an eye on what the “other” hand is doing right now.

    Things might be about to explode, while the Media covers primaries, big sports and the Oscars!

  2. I share your fears. Nothing would surprise me with Mr. Soetero.

  3. Honor First……

    The Winds of War are blowing……I have seen this before. So have you

  4. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    As I said last week – We will be at war with Iran on the 25th of January – The day before the Ga case.

  5. “Roger Hedgecock Tackles Obama’s Eligibility And Georgia Court Hearing”

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/roger-hedgecock-tackles-obamas.html

    ———-
    Part of a comment about above:

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/roger-hedgecock-tackles-obamas.html?showComment=1327424173585#c4135984852942446529

    “This exchange is quite revealing. I admit I don’t know much about Hedgecock but he’s not unlike many mainline talk show hosts. Still, after all this time, they don’t even know the right questions to be asking. They’re like parrots. Gibbering away repeating the same talking points now for 4+ years. For instance, the whole newspaper announcement thing “proving” Obama was born in Hawaii. Is it any wonder that inquiries into Barry’s past have gone nowhere? This guy, Hedgecock, represents that “faction” of the “media” most likely to investigate and demand answers and frankly he sounds just as aloof and just as clueless as the rest of them. …”

  6. Mr. Bill(ms. helga) | January 24, 2012 at 3:24 pm |

    As I said last week – We will be at war with Iran on the 25th of January – The day before the Ga case.

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    I disagree and for many reasons. However, I understand your point of view. Clinton pull off the same whopper with the invasion of Kosovo, Bosnia/ Yugoslavia Peninsula. But the lesson learned, was that his attorneys still could not escape the enviable.

    Trust me when I say that the Liberal/Socialist have paid strict attention to this matter and learned from it. They will not make the same mistake twice in such a similar situation.

    Rather what we will see in the Media and from his Administration is that Obama “Avoided” a war by his Heroic actions of intelligence, quick thinking, wits and ability to negotiate foreign policy under pressure from U.S. threats, thus saving the world from a massive crises.

    This “Savior propaganda” is more powerful than war itself….

  7. should read:

    Inevitable, not enviable.

  8. From Sam Sewell of The Steady Drip:

    “Georgia Update from Carl Swensson
    Now they want to play musical courtrooms. This has to be a tactic initiated by Jablonski whether he takes credit for it or not. Regardless, Thursday’s hearing WILL occur. Fulton County is a DEM stronghold. Make sure everybody sees this ASAP.
    In my humble opinion, it would appear that this kind of tactic is all they have in their arsenal. Hoping that people won’t or can’t show up because they don’t know where to go.”

    http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2012/01/georgia-update-from-carl-swensson.html

  9. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    CW – Can you find that site that will cover LIVE the hearing on the 26th in Ga?

  10. Mr. Bill.
    Will try to stay on top of it.

  11. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    Remember – It’s Ratings,Ratings,Ratings!!!

  12. Mr. Bill…….

    The site is : Art2Superpac.com

    Go to Giveusliberty.com

  13. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    Thank you rminc.

  14. This long protracted debate in which no one can claim front runner, in MHO is a blessing. It is a teachable moment for all those who have (in the past), not paid much attention to conservatism. It also keeps the spotlight off Der fuhrer.
    Conservatives have their differences. In the end I will vote ABO (for the sake of my grandchildren). Don’t trust Gingrich, Romney or Santorum. But any one of them would be better than what we have.
    I never thought I’d ever say this but Paul is looking more reasonable to me.

  15. Georgia Democrat Party Says Republicans Carrying Out “Political Tricks” Against Obama »

    BUT TWO DEMOCRATS ARE PLAINTIFFS!

    http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/24/georgia-democrat-party-says-republicans-carrying-out-political-tricks-against-obama/

  16. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    SueQ – My theory. We need Ron Paul to run on a third party Independent. The OWS(Occupy Wall St) crowd seem to like Paul. If notPaul they would vote for the USURPER. Most Republicans will vote for any candidate put up. The hope is that with the Obama voters-especially the young- going for Paul – and the Republican voters will CAUSE an insufficient number (271) of Electoral College votes to DECLARE a winner. THIS WILL CAUSE THE REPUBLICAN HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TO PICK A PRESIDENT!!

    PS – There is a movement afoot to get rid of the Electoral College and resort to a pure Democracy. ONE COUNT ONE VOTE(Mob Rule). Only the big states would win.New York & California would gain all the power.

    If we didn’t have the Electoral College system, Al Gore would have been the President instead of George Bush.

  17. Please, please, please help me out of moderation….5:49

    It was about :”Georgia Democrat Party Says Republicans Carrying Out ‘Political Tricks’ Against Obama”….this time I’ll leave out the link.

  18. See it worked. I swear it has something to do with linking to opposition to Obama links.

  19. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    Hold on – I just came up with a thought. What if the Republicans said that if you let George Bush be this President, we will let you have the next election??? Anything is possible in today’s elections and POLITICIANS!!

  20. Mr. Bill(ms. helga) | January 24, 2012 at 5:51 pm |

    SueQ – My theory. We need Ron Paul to run on a third party Independent.

    ———————————

    He said he won’t. I admire him for that.

  21. I know it is mean, but I hope Mitch Daniels flubs his lines tonight so the elite stop trying to push him as a late entry GOP candidate. Remember when Jindal gave a terrible response to the SOTU speech? He was dropped like a lead balloon after that from consideration.

    Also, Obama dwarfs Daniels. Mitch is just too short, when tall men often win, and since he is of Syrian descent, he isn’t that pro-Israel. For a variety of reasons, Daniels is all wrong for this election coming up.

  22. I know it is mean, but I hope Mitch Daniels flubs his lines tonight so the elite stop trying to push him as a late entry GOP candidate. Remember when Jindal gave a terrible response to the SOTU speech? He was dropped like a lead balloon after that from consideration.

  23. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    “Politicians are the lowest form of life, except for liberal Democrats. They are the lowest form of politician.” – General George Patton

  24. Also, Obama dwarfs Daniels. Mitch is just too short, when tall men often win, and since he is of Arab descent, he isn’t that pro-Israel. For a variety of reasons, Daniels is all wrong for this election coming up.

  25. Cellini refused a new trial, Zagel will go to sentencing next.

  26. Interested Bystander

    SueQ,

    In my opinion, Paul was the ONLY “adult” on stage last night.

    I was disappointed that the first half hour of the debate was focused on Newt and Romney arguing about how much money each one made, and with whom the money was made.

    It’s no wonder the National Enquirer sells so well.

    Blah, blah and more blah.

    Why worry about the REAL problems facing this Country?

    And when Newt was answering the question about Cuba, I sat here shaking my head back and forth. Newt wants to INVADE Cuba. And Santorum saying that Iran was getting a foothold in this hemisphere and about how “dangerous” they are, and that we should be bombing their nuclear facilities, it really is disgusting.

    I thought one of the best parts of the debate was when Paul looked at Newt and told him that he still had to work on Newt’s foreign policy stance.

    But Paul continually (at least when he was given an opportunity to speak) tried to get the debate back on the REAL issue, our collapse at the hands of the Fed and our fiscal spending.

    Paul sees what’s on the horizon, and I believe that the candidates and the media are playing “smoke and mirrors” with the Iran issue.

    Paul is right, we already committed an “act of war” against Iran, and it is not unreasonable to think that there will be retaliation of one form or another for assassinating scientists and blockading their ports.

    It’s sad to see the American people falling for this “smoke and mirrors” tactic.

    The same tactic WE used against the Soviets is being used against us. For Newt to stand up there and say that he had a hand in the policy that brought down the Soviet Union, and then NOT to open his eyes to see that the same tactic is being used AGAINST us is somewhat puzzling to me. Or maybe he does, and he thinks that we are “too big to fail” which is absurd.

    Santorum stood up there and said that he wouldn’t have been for TARP or the stimulus, but he didn’t have a VOTE, and it’s easy to say things after the fact. It would have been interesting to see what he ACTUALLY would have done, because Paul voted against BOTH bills (Paul also voted AGAINST the NDAA).

    Paul sounded pretty good last night, and was straightforward and honest with the people.

    Until we get our fiscal spending AND monetary stability under control, we are a doomed nation.

  27. typical socialist mentality…redistribute YOUR wealth, but not MINE

  28. Interested Bystander | January 24, 2012 at 6:08 pm |
    “Paul is right, we already committed an “act of war” against Iran, and it is not unreasonable to think that there will be retaliation of one form or another for assassinating scientists and blockading their ports.”
    ___________________
    Can you show me where this quote is from Paul(“act of war”)?, and is it proven that WE(?) assassinated their scientists?

    I am warming somewhat to Paul, but I don’t concur with these statements.

  29. Thanks Bessie.

  30. The sickness and the thug tactics only seems to grow:

    Occupy Protestors Disrupt Washington Pro-Life Prayer Vigil

    http://www.lifenews.com/2012/01/23/occupy-protestors-disrupt-washington-pro-life-prayer-vigil/

    Gensemer said that, as those leading the prayer vigil began to invite pro-life advocates to join in worship, those with the pro-abortion opposition positioned themselves inches away from the musicians, chanting, screaming, and dragging a ten-foot banner between the team and those trying to pray and worship.

    One member of the pro-abortion force actually spent an extended amount of time screaming into the face of an adopted child whose sign read: “I’m glad I was adopted and not murdered.”

    Despite the obnoxious and aggressive activity of these abortion advocates, members of CEC For Life continued to pray aloud and worship in unity. Many of the pro-life youth attempted to engage the opponents in productive dialogue, but few would stop yelling long enough to speak with these courageous young people.

  31. Drudge headline:

    PELOSI THREAT: NEWT WON’T BE PRESIDENT
    ‘THERE IS SOMETHING I KNOW’

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/01/24/pelosi_on_a_gingrich_presidency_that_will_never_happen.html

    Rep. Nancy Pelosi: “Let me just say this. That will never happen.”

    King: “Why?”

    Pelosi: “He’s not going to be President of the United States. That’s not going to happen. Let me just make my prediction and stand by it, it isn’t going to happen.”

    King: “Why are you so sure?”

    Pelosi: “There is something I know. The Republicans, if they choose to nominate him that’s their prerogative. I don’t even think that’s going to happen.”

  32. Sue Q

    short video, pay attention to 7:50 on act of war
    Video: Ron Paul Highlights in Florida GOP Debate – 1/23/12

    http://www.dailypaul.com/

  33. That Nancy Pelosi has been saber-rattling about Newt for sometime. She claims to know things she was privy to during the House investigation in the 90’s..

    If she were to release anything that is not already in the public domain, she would be in violation of the rules, and perhaps commit a crime.

    Methinks she believes that her threats are sufficient to sway people, but just how many would believe HER, except those Dems who are already Newt’s enemies?

  34. With all due respect to Rep. Ron Paul, he is not going to be the party’s nominee. He has openly expressed that he knows it, and most of us know it.

    His intention appears to be an influence in shaping the debate and the party’s platform, with a speaking opportunity at the Republican National Convention.

    Also, I believe that he will NOT run on a third party ticket for the sake of his son, Senator Rand Paul, who is a rising star in the party. His running as a third party candidate would put Rand in an awkward position. Just thoughts.

  35. Tea Party Express Press Release

    http://www.teapartyexpress.org/herman-cain-to-deliver-tea-party-state-of-the-union-response#more-2972

    Herman Cain will be joining the Tea Party Express in D.C. to give a Tea Party response to the State of the Union.

    What: Tea Party response to the State of the Union
    When: Tuesday January 24th at 10:30 PM EST/7:30 PM PST (Following the Republican response)
    Where: Watch online at TeaPartyExpress.org

  36. Hey Nancy….there’s a LOT of things we STILL know about Billy Clinton….if THAT doesn’t bother you people then stop the phony grandstanding of some kind of moral superiority. Like the country, you’re bankrupt! And, guess what…there’s a lot of stuff we know about your personal hero….and it ain’t pretty either.

  37. Here is a live link to hear Herman Cain’s speech:

    http://www.teapartyexpress.org/

    10:30 PM EST/7:30 PM PST (following the Republican response)

  38. (carried over from prior thread)
    Great article by whistleblower, J. Christian Adams:
    (former DOJ attorney)

    Why Romney Lost: Part III: The Mood of the Country

    (quote)
    “Our president has divided the nation and engaged in class warfare,” said Romney Saturday night.

    Most Republicans realized this years ago. Now they seek a general to lead them into a titanic political battle against a president who, they believe, seeks to convert this country into something that was unimaginable a generation ago.

    They want a general who uses language to inspire them for the fight. And so far, Mitt Romney hasn’t found it.

    They want a leader in the fight that does not lag behind them. They want a leader who says the things they believe.

    Read more:

    http://pjmedia.com/jchristianadams/2012/01/23/why-romney-lost-part-iii/

  39. If Nancy Pelosi knows something Newt has done in the past that is CRIMINAL in nature, and does not NOW disclose it to the proper authorities, since she has publicly stated such on national television, then Nancy Pelosi has just become an accessory to a CRIMINAL COVERUP and will be as guilty as Newt, if her dirty little secret is ever discovered.

    However,if Nancy is trying to use something she may, or may not know, that happened long ago to prevent Newt from becoming the Republican candidate for President, then she is openly committing BLACKMAIL, which is a FELONY, punishable by a very long JAIL sentence.

    Nothing would do my heart more good than to see Nancy Pelosi, along with Barack Obama serving time in jail.

    Either way, I think Newt now has dear ole Nancy in a “damn if she does, damn if she don’t situation”….this may prove to be MSSSSSSSSSSS Nancy’s final fall from grace.

    I sure hope so !

  40. Rminnc, I heard Newt address the Pelosi threat sometime ago, so he is well aware of her tactics. I don’t think he will be caught off guard, and, as you say, “this may prove to be MSSSSSSSSSSS Nancy’s final fall from grace.”

  41. watching SOTU…ugh….Did anyone notice Hillary’s very glum expression?

  42. The Usurper is still speaking….on and on. I just can’t watch it steadily. His words mean nothing to me. Even though I knew he was Marxist/Muslim back before he was elected, I see this SOTU tonight in an eery light, especially after learning all that we now know about him and the treasonous behavior of many in attendance.

    Eric Holder is there, of course. What a traitor!! He ought to be impeached, but there is no one in that august body that will step forward. A bunch of cowards – Makes me sick at heart. How long will this charade continue?

  43. The English Common Law Definition of Natural Law Is Not Part Of The Law Of Nations.
    Posted in Uncategorized on January 24, 2012 by naturalborncitizen

    Some have written to ask me whether the Law of Nations is based on natural law, and whether this creates a contradiction to my argument in the Amicus Brief I have submitted in the Georgia POTUS eligibility cases. The answer is no, it is not a contradiction in any way, shape or form. And here’s why:

    http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/

  44. kwajcat | January 24, 2012 at 10:10 pm |
    watching SOTU…ugh….Did anyone notice Hillary’s very glum expression?
    **********************
    Yes, but when O referred to her as having run against him, she got a sweet, sickening little smile on her face. It’s just too much!

  45. Cabby – AZ | January 24, 2012 at 10:16 pm |

    The Usurper is still speaking….on and on.
    ***************************
    Couldn’t take it, had to turn the liar off.

    Watching Planet Earth instead.

  46. Who in their right mind picked MITCH DANIELS to give the Republican response…..that was the most mild toast response I have ever heard……

    Also he looked so ashen, pale, and no color (no pun intended)…looked like someone had freshly dug him up.

  47. A Crazy Old Coot

    Cabby – AZ | January 24, 2012 at 8:26 pm |
    That Nancy Pelosi has been saber-rattling about Newt for sometime. She claims to know things she was privy to during the House investigation in the 90′s..
    /////////////////////////////////////
    Isn’t this the same person as speaker of the house lied through her teeth the entire time? Gonna train the swamp in DC…. didn’t happen, just got worse.

  48. A Crazy Old Coot

    train should be drain.

  49. Then there was Mr. Obama….
    FULL OF SOUND AND FURY, SIGNIFYING NOTHING.

  50. I had to turn off the Golfer in Chief as well. He does nothing but divide us.

    And Mitch Daniels raced through his speech, which the elites thought was great; I didn’t; and he looked puny on the TV screen, even when they did close ups to make him look bigger. He doesn’t have the gravitas of Newt, Mitt or Rick. The elites need to get over him.

  51. John KIng helping Newt AGAIN! Opening up a can of worms with Pelosi…

    Rep. Nancy Pelosi: “Let me just say this. That will never happen.”

    King: “Why?”

    Pelosi: “He’s not going to be President of the United States. That’s not going to happen. Let me just make my prediction and stand by it, it isn’t going to happen.”

    King: “Why are you so sure?”

    Pelosi: “There is something I know. The Republicans, if they choose to nominate him that’s their prerogative. I don’t even think that’s going to happen.”

    Nancy, there is something that we know. We know you criminally certified Obama was NBC in 2008. Obama will never win re-election, That’s not going to happen. Let me just make my prediction and stand by it, it isn’t going to happen.

    Oh, and yes, you are going to be charged with crimes in 2013. Have a wonderful day!

  52. You are on a roll tonight, Bill G!

  53. Did anyone notice that Justice Alito snubbed Obama when he passed by? Had to watch it twice to make sure, but he did.

  54. Tina | January 24, 2012 at 10:53 pm |
    I had to turn off the Golfer in Chief as well. He does nothing but divide us.

    And Mitch Daniels raced through his speech, which the elites thought was great; I didn’t; and he looked puny on the TV screen, even when they did close ups to make him look bigger. He doesn’t have the gravitas of Newt, Mitt or Rick. The elites need to get over him.
    *********************************
    Exactly, Tina. I only listened off and on. I wasn’t impressed with Mitch Daniels either and can’t understand why “they” are wishing he would enter the race. I doubt that it will happen. He was too adamant about his prior decision and would be a poor candidate, imho. Old Salt has his opinions about him, too.

  55. Bill G | January 24, 2012 at 11:09 pm |

    Nancy, there is something that we know. We know you criminally certified Obama was NBC in 2008.
    **************************
    Kudos, Bill G.! If she gets too strident, a bunch of us should remind her.

  56. Wow, I just heard Tucker Carlson interviewed by Hannity. Tucker says if Newt wins in FL, the Repubs in Washington are going to have a fit. They will really have to scramble. I yelled out, “Good”!!! Let’s see the elitists get upset for a change. I certainly am not for their choosing our nominee.

  57. Cabby – AZ | January 25, 2012 at 12:03 am |
    Wow, I just heard Tucker Carlson interviewed by Hannity. Tucker says if Newt wins in FL, the Repubs in Washington are going to have a fit. They will really have to scramble. I yelled out, “Good”!!! Let’s see the elitists get upset for a change. I certainly am not for their choosing our nominee.

    ————–

    Totally agree.

  58. Go to WND to read Pam Geller on Newt, the SOB we need.

    “And several weeks ago, Gingrich far exceeded all expectations when he spoke the truth about the fact that the “Palestinians” are an invented people, a fake nationality created by Yasser Arafat as a weapon to destroy Israel. The ensuing reaction from the Jew-hating left was visceral, but not unexpected. I was enormously disappointed, however, as the entire Republican field dumped on Gingrich for telling the truth about the Muslims in Gaza and the Jewish territories of Judea and Samaria.

    “Gingrich said what everyone knew: that the emperor has no clothes. But Romney, Santorum and conservative Washington insiders used Israel as their excuse for their failure to stand up for the truth when it was finally spoken. Instead of spontaneous, enthusiastic support for Gingrich’s exposing of the dirty lie, they sought to force the cat back into the bag. Shameful.

    “Yes, Gingrich has much to answer for. Yet while Newt has an inconsistent history, he seems a man of the time. He knows what America needs: He sees the threats from within and without, and he is pulling no punches. Romney is not strong enough for the coming battle. Newt may be an SOB, but he’s our SOB. And we need an SOB to defeat the snake in the White House.

    “Despite the influence of independents and Democrats who vote in these primaries, the Republican base does not want a RINO. Get out the vote. Volunteer, donate, knock on doors. If Hamas satellite organizations in the U.S. like CAIR are sweating bullets over a Newt candidacy, he would be best for freedom and country.”

  59. Observer……………..
    I got some news for you……in the video where allegedly Pelosi was being interviewed about her alleged position regarding Gingrich……..the female is NOT MMMMSSSS.Important. Thie is a paid actor who has a resemblence to MMMMSSSS.IMPORTANT. This appears to be another LIBERAL attempt to make people think UP is down. Again that is NOT Pelosi. First phoney BCs, now we got PHONEY PELOSIs. The person in the video has a completely different personality than Pelosi. Nor does the impersonator use the same words the Pelosi uses. Lastly she did not have the usual Pelosi facial GRIMACES,that Pelosi emanates unconsiously. I SEE THROUGH that little CHERADE.

  60. Whoever hired the Pelosi impersonator chose a PISS POOR actor. The actress was 180degrees opposite of Pelosi. Hell they failed at the BCs so you can be sure they will fail at trying to use impersonaters. This was another LIBERAL play right out of the LIBERAL play book. Anything to try to make people think that MMMMSSSSS. Pelosi WILL reveal something that will sink Newt. If this IS something that the REAL Pelosi is thinking about doing she had better think a VERY THOROUGH second time ,if it is anything from the ETHICS INVESTIGATION. Most of that CANNOT BE REVEALED BY AGREEMENT. Newt would have a FIELD DAY if that was to happen,and it would be PELOSI who would GO DOWN IN FLAMES. I can’t imagine Pelosi being that IGNORANT.

  61. Phoney Pelosi’s??? God isnt one enough??? Ughmph!!!… There goes my dinner!

  62. BillG…………..Ref 1:03AM….
    I couldn’t have said it better myself. There is going to be a lot of weeping Republicans after the election if they try to send Romney to do what needs to be done by a FULLY experienced POLITICAL FIGHTER, who is MAN enough to call a spade a spade which so far has been Newt’s style. Yeah the SNOT NOSED REPUBLICAN CHILD PRODIGIES all think just like the LIBERALS, they talk about defeating. If they send Romney HE WILL LOSE,and America will have another 4 years of Soetoro. Then like LIBERALS the CHILD PRODIGIES will try to blame everybody else for their own stupidity. I am praying that the PEOPLE OF FLORIDA will realise what needs to be done…..and DO IT.

  63. Yesterday a commenter pointed out that we all thought McCain was a fighter. Well the commenter tried to speak for me when he said “WE ALL”. While I looked upon McCain as the better choice of the TWO, I didn’t really feel comfortable with him. I voted a straight Republican ticket then,and again in November of 2010. What happened in 2010 was exactly why I voted the straight Republican ticket. For many years I voted a SPLIT ticket. That is because I customarily voted for the person who I felt was best qualified. Now we are faced with a choice of candidates who range from BAD to POOR, but if they will be potentially unseating a LIBERAL. Yeah there is RISK in anything we do, but not near the risk to America if we DON’T. That is primarily why I am standing in Gingriche’s corner. He is the LESSER of the MANY EVILS. Just my personal view point. No offense intended to anyone.

  64. Jerome ………………….
    Agree with you 100%. But TELLING IS TELLING. The impersonator is PISS POOR, as are MOST OF the ELVIS IMPERSONATORS as well. The first CLUE is the LACK of the Pelosi FACIAL GRIMACES, which have always CRACKED ME UP BIG TIME. Then you need to listen to her choice of words. They are NOT the PELOSI style at all. As I said, PHONEY BCs, NOW PHONY PELOSIs. Sorry about causing you to regurgitate your dinner.FACT IS FACT.

  65. Good Morning,

    Does anyone have news pertaining to the 3 state of Illinois.ballot challenges from yesterdays hearings?

    I haven’t heard anything as of yet.

  66. bc | January 24, 2012 at 8:02 pm |

    Sue Q

    short video, pay attention to 7:50 on act of war
    Video: Ron Paul Highlights in Florida GOP Debate – 1/23/12
    ——————————————
    Thanks bc,
    Notice what he said at 6:14… “I have a little bit of work to do on foreign policy”. That said, I think he is spot on in other areas. I don’t think he should be underestimated.

  67. I was just checking in on Larry Sinclair’s site and it is looking very good. It looks like a news site and the content is good as well.

    http://www.larrysinclair.org/

  68. Pat 1789 | January 25, 2012 at 7:57 am |

    This guy even filed one of Obamo’s JPEG BC’s as evidence. If I am not mistaken this is the first time that has happened.

  69. Looks like the establishment is circling the wagons for Newt and trying to re write history. Newt was kicked out of Congress because he sold Republicans down the river when we were in the majority. What a loser.

    He will still do well in the south though, he has the redneck vote locked.

  70. I now know who I will vote for:

    IF NANCY PELOSI IS AGAINST NEWT…. THEN i’M FOR HIM. To date, she has said nothing about Willard.

    If needed, I would vote for a mangy dog before I would vote for anyone Nancy Pelopsi supports.

    Did everyone notice last night, she is still the old “‘spring-butt” she has always been. Every time Obama opened his lying mouth, she was always the first on her feet….

    Atta girl Nancy, San Francisco trained you well.

  71. Mornin folks!

    I think it’d be a great thing if we got as many people down on their knees today to pray for tomorrow’s proceedings….for courage for the judge and for all the attys involved to do well in making their points, supplying the right reasoning in a convincing manner. Whatever angels are supplied for courtrooms…may they be increased!
    ==========================================

    Suppose they will follow IL here:

    http://obamaballotchallenge.com/obama-enters-motion-to-strike-and-dismiss-illinois-ballot-challenge

  72. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    Less than 24 hours for the hearing. You can see/hear live tomorrow at

    http://art2superpac.com/

    Here are some interesting comments –

    http://www.sacbee.com/2012/01/20/4203280/ga-judge-orders-president-to-appear.html?storylink=lingospot#disqus_thread

  73. Fearing Gingrich, Both Sides Say He’s Unelectable
    Wednesday, January 25, 2012 9:01:57 AM · by jimluke01 · 1 replies
    NewsMax ^ | Matt Barber
    What do establishment Republicans and liberal Democrats have in common? They’ve long labored under a shared misconception: conservative candidates are unelectable. In 1980, conventional wisdom held that Ronald Reagan didn’t stand a chance against Jimmy Carter. The GOP leadership, the mainstream media and liberal politicos alike lined up against the Gipper in an attempt to derail his presidential campaign. Rush Limbaugh recently addressed this phenomenon on his radio program: “Gerald Ford said that Ronald Reagan was unelectable. George H.W. Bush said that Ronald Reagan was unelectable. The entire Republican establishment thought Ronald Reagan was unelectable because they were governed and…

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2837540/posts

  74. Anyone interested in knowing what really happened in 1996, 96, and 97 concerning the Newt Gingrich Ethics violation in Congress should go to website: THESTEADYDRIP.COM

    When CNN admits the charges were FALSE and the IRS says they are NON-SUPPORTIVE….then thats good enough for me….

    The real villans, (democrats) Carl Lewis (of Ga,) and Dave Bonier (of Mi) who were behind the hatchet job on Newt, should have gone to jail. But, that’s politics, and one must remember, “all’s fair in love, war, and politics”.

    Like Newt said this morning on Fox, if Nancy Pelosi has something….BRING IT ON !…otherwise keep your mouth shut, your doing nothing but catching flys… and showing your ignorance.

    Very interesting reading, sheds light on who Newt really is. Highly recommended.

  75. zachjonesishome | January 25, 2012 at 9:13 am |

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2837545/posts

    “Mr. Beck, if I may?”
    ***************************************************
    Hooray for Newt!

    Newt doesn’t take any crap from anybody.

  76. OUCH!!!!

    Very harsh article about Newt from the Personal Liberty Conservative Politics. Link to full story at bottom. Some snippets…

    “Lying Newt

    January 25, 2012 by Bob Livingston

    Apparently, Newt Gingrich never learned the Mark Twain adage: “If you tell the truth, you don’t have to remember anything.”

    …”Gingrich is trying hard to “prove” he’s a conservative. It would be a difficult slog if people paid attention to reality and substance rather than fluff and propaganda. Unfortunately, most Republican voters are treating the nomination process like another episode of “American Idol” or “Dancing With the Stars.”

    …”Gingrich has supported cap and trade, individual mandates, bailouts, TARP and gun control. He believes the USA Patriot Act is good legislation. He said he would have voted for the recently passed, Constitution-killing National Defense Authorization Act, which allows the government to arrest and detain Americans on U.S. soil and hold them indefinitely without charges or trial.”

    ….”On numerous occasions, Gingrich has called Franklin Delano Roosevelt his favorite President of the 20th Century, and has said FDR was the greatest President. This is the same FDR whose New Deal policies both deepened and prolonged the Great Depression, who confiscated private property (including individually owned gold), redistributed wealth, raised taxes on businesses to more than 90 percent, conducted illegal wiretaps, tried to shut down opposition newspapers, used government make-work programs to finance and work for his campaigns, illegally interned 110,000 Japanese Americans, gave special benefits to labor unions, destroyed food while Americans starved, let Communists infiltrate his Administration and made a deal with Joseph Stalin that left millions of Eastern Europeans to suffer and die under Communism.”

    Full story with supportive additional links.

    http://www.personalliberty.com/conservative-politics/lying-newt/?eiid=

  77. William | January 25, 2012 at 10:05 am |

    OUCH!!!!

    Very harsh article about Newt from the Personal Liberty Conservative Politics. Link to full story at bottom. Some snippets…

    “Lying Newt
    ————————————————————————————————————
    Reads just like a Romney attack ad.

  78. Citizenship: Easy Come, Easy Go?
    By Cindy Simpson

    Rather than engage in the politically incorrect practice of “profiling,” our government, under the guise of national security, has chosen to subject everyone who holds an airline ticket, from small children to grannies, to uncomfortable and unreasonable searches by the TSA.

    Likewise, rather than restrict dual citizenship or reform the controversial practice of granting U.S. citizenship to every baby born on our soil, our government leaders have chosen instead to pass legislation that endangers the rights of citizenship of all of us.

    “Being an American is not a matter of blood or birth,” Obama explained in a 2010 speech on immigration reform. “It’s a matter of faith. It’s a matter of fidelity to the shared values that we all hold so dear.”

    Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/01/citizenship_easy_come_easy_goes.html#ixzz1kU2CczPW

  79. Jerome,

    I would agree. The real question is how much of it truth regardless whether or not it is an attack?

    Personally, I do not like either Mitt nor Newt as I am familiar with both their pasts. Its best to determine a politician by what they supported as a matter of record in the past, rather than what they are saying – today…..

    But that’s just me.

  80. Dear Observer,
    Prayers are definitely in order for tomorrow’s hearing! I have been praying to St. Michael the Archangel. He will defend us against evil. Judge Malahi is also named Michael. It can’t hurt!

  81. Georgia Democrat Party Says Republicans Carrying Out “Political Tricks” Against Obama

    BUT TWO DEMOCRATS ARE PLAINTIFFS!

    by Sharon Rondeau

    The State of Georgia has 13 congressional districts. Population is concentrated in the greater Atlanta area.

    (Jan. 24, 2012) — The Georgia Democrat Party is asking for donations to mount an offensive against the challenges to Obama’s constitutional eligibility which are scheduled to be heard on Thursday in Atlanta. The Chairman of the party calls the challenges “frivolous lawsuits.”

    However, two plaintiffs represented by Atty. Orly Taitz, Cody Robert Judy and Leah Lax, are contenders for the Democrat Party’s nomination for President.

    http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/24/georgia-democrat-party-says-republicans-carrying-out-political-tricks-against-obama/

  82. Obama is Born Again? Two Kenyan Hospitals Provide BC’s! Updated
    Posted on January 23, 2012 by Bridgette
    © Bridgette WTPOTUS 2012

    Two Kenyan Hospitals Now Claim Obama’s Birth!
    Another Kenyan Birth Certificate Surfaces!!

    http://wtpotus.wordpress.com/

  83. GORDO | January 24, 2012 at 3:39 pm |

    “Roger Hedgecock Tackles Obama’s Eligibility And Georgia Court Hearing”

    Part of a comment about above:

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/roger-hedgecock-tackles-obamas.html?showComment=1327424173585#c4135984852942446529

    “This exchange is quite revealing. I admit I don’t know much about Hedgecock but he’s not unlike many mainline talk show hosts. Still, after all this time, they don’t even know the right questions to be asking. They’re like parrots. Gibbering away repeating the same talking points now for 4+ years. For instance, the whole newspaper announcement thing “proving” Obama was born in Hawaii. Is it any wonder that inquiries into Barry’s past have gone nowhere? This guy, Hedgecock, represents that “faction” of the “media” most likely to investigate and demand answers and frankly he sounds just as aloof and just as clueless as the rest of them. …”
    **************************************************************************************
    GORDO, look at how the AP->WAPO->etc. have run with this absurd ‘news’ story, President Obama was ordered to appear at an Administrative Law Hearing! I am not a paid reporter or professional journalist; but even I researched my articles on this subject BEFORE posting them. Certainly, at the outset, I READ the supposed Order in question and saw, it wasn’t an Order at all but a denial of a Motion to Quash! My further reading taught me, an ALJ cannot even issue an Order to Appear. (Maybe I am just accustomed to double checking anything Orly says.) WITNESS FOR ORLY’S PERSECUTION or MUCH ADO ABOUT ABSOLUTELY NOTHING

  84. zachjonesishome | January 25, 2012 at 8:20 am |

    http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/article/what-really-happened-gingrich-ethics-case/336051

    ================================
    This is what Msssssss. Pelosi is holding over Newt’s head????

    Cole developed a theory of the case in which Gingrich, looking for a way to spread his political views, came up with the idea of creating a college course and then devised a way to use a tax-exempt foundation to pay the bills. “The idea to develop the message and disseminate it for partisan political use came first,” Cole told the Ethics Committee. “The use of the [the Progress and Freedom Foundation] came second as a source of funding.” Thus, Cole concluded, the course was “motivated, at least in part, by political goals.” Cole argued that even a hint of a political motive, was enough to taint the tax-exempt project, “regardless of the number or importance of truly exempt purposes that are present.”
    #####

    Obama’s GM closings, Fast and Furious, Solyndra, Obamacare, overstepping Constitution authority and this is all the dems have against Newt?

    Looky here…….
    Monica Crowley: “Alinsky Dedicated His Book to Lucifer… And Obama Taught Alinsky” (Video)

    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/01/monica-crowley-alinsky-dedicated-his-book-to-lucifer-and-obama-taught-alinsky-video/

  85. bob,
    concerning the article on American Thinker you posted….I wonder if the author is a “birther”. The author certainly makes an excellent case as to why a dual citizen CANNOT be POTUS by this statement:

    “Foreign-born applicants for U.S. citizenship must formally reject other citizenships in their Oath of Naturalization. However, children born here as dual citizens are never formally required to make such a renouncement.”

  86. FYI………………
    About 20 minutes ago I was watching the Giffords resignation in the Senate chamber. The cameraman briefly focused on Pelosi. Guess what! She now, and once again has the old straight hairdo,and once again has the usual expression on her face. This all CONFIRMS that the woman in the interview video posted last night is a Pelosi PHONEY. I saw through it then and now am even more convinced. Now we have Pelosi phoneys on top of phoney BCs. BTW this is all pretty much in evidence resulting from the general upper body build of the phoney. The phoney is a tad heavier across her upper body than Pelosi. Pelosi is also narrower across the shoulders. If anybody still has the video, take some reallyu close looks at how the phoney moves, how she expresses herself espacially with regard to her eyes,and mouth. Together it tells the truth. PHONEY,PHONEY,PHONEY. Today even Fox thinks that it was PELOSI! This tells me something that I already knew. They are also dumber than boxes of rocks. I now know that this is a cherade designed as an attempt to intimidate Newt Gingrich. I also sent a letter to the Gingrich campaign regarding my suspicions.

  87. I seriously doubt that the Pelosi BULLSH#t is going to intimidate Gingrich. If it does then he deserves what will indeed follow. Also something else to watch is how the phoney orally articulates her words. Nothing like Pelosi. All telling! I think this cherade was done with Pelosi’s full knowledge and consent. This way if push comes to shove she can evade any consequences by saying that that was NOT her,and that the phoney said all of that without her knowledge or consent. Voila…. she is squeaky clean. HAR DE HAR HAR

  88. Jonah……………….
    First of all I look upon the Pelosi CRAP as totally fabricated…including the video. But if pelosi does think that she can use anything from the records of the ETHICS INVESTIGATION she had better think a second time ….long and hard. Newt as well as everyone who was involved with the investigation that this ALL is CONFIDENTIAL BY agreement,and if she divulges any of it then it will be MMMMSSSS.PELOSI who GOES DOWN IN FLAMES. I doubt very seriously if Gingrich will mess around or mince any words he will simply say what needs to be said, and what he says will in turn be so damaging to her that she will not be able to find a hole in the ground deep enough to stick her head into. If he doesn’t fight back then he will lose from that point on.

  89. PLEASE WATCH THESE MUST SEE VIDEOS!!!

    Obama May Cancel 2012 Elections! (1 of 2)
    Dr. Jerome Corsi

    * * * *

    Obama May Cancel 2012 Elections! (2 of 2)
    Dr. Jerome Corsi

    Excerpt:

    “Dr. Jerome Corsi discusses who Barack H Obama II is and whether he will cancel the 2012 elections under the cover of economic collapse!

    A private investigation reveals that the Social Security Number being used by Barack Obama does not pass a check with E-Verify, the electronic system the U.S. Citizenship and Immigrations Services of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has created to verify whether or not prospective employees have the required authorization to work legally in the United States.

    Dr. Jerome Corsi’s Outstanding Article Is At This Link:
    http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=344461#ixzz1XsL18aBY

    Over the past few years, the E-Verify system has received national attention because of its ability to determine if prospective employees are illegal immigrants who have entered the United States without the legal authority to work.”

    http://www.infowars.com

    http://www.prisonplanet.tv

    http://www.infowars.net

    http://www.prisonplanet.com

    http://twitter.com/#!/realalexjones

    * * * *

    ~ BETWEEN THE LINES ~

    “CHRISTIANS: BE PREPARED FOR BAD TIMES AHEAD”

    “EXCLUSIVE: JOSEPH FARAH EXHORTS BELIEVERS TO TAKE JESUS’ WARNINGS SERIOUSLY”

    Joseph Farah
    Between The Lines
    WND.com
    January 23, 2012

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/christians-be-prepared-for-bad-times-ahead/

  90. typoinvestigation “KNOW” insert after “investigation”.

  91. The Current INS Officially Recognizes A Delineation Between Natural-Born and Native-Born.

    http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2012/01/25/the-current-ins-officiall

    y-recognizes-a-delineation-between-natural-born-and-native-born/

  92. Jerome……………..
    You are right again. Even the SNOT NOSED child PEPUBLICAN PRODIGIES are afraid of NEWT. He knows stuff that if he ever told about would probably sink the entire Republican LIBERAL FLEET. Perhaps he will see fit to repeat something that HE KNOWS about the LIBERALS that was discussed in the ETHICS INVESTIGATION,and if revealed would send the person or persons involved to the bottom as well……..POLITICALLY,and PERSONALLY. As long as NEWT remains TOUGH nobody will be able to circumvent it, NOT EVEN the MANURE SPREADER himself who BTW has some serious issues himself as a DIRECTOR of Bain Capital.

  93. Does anybody remember the GROWLS and SNARLS of McCain, at the outset of his campaign. Then suddenly all the GROWLS,and SNARLS turned into very MEEK little MMEEOOWWS! The reason was the SNOT NOSED LITTLE KNOW IT ALLS within the Republican party. They KNOW SO MUCH that they keep right on LOSING ELECTIONS,by sanctioning their buddies instead of the correct people. As long as they do this HELL WILL FREEZE over before they win anything. Even the Democratic LIBERALS are laughing at them, and they are too damn stupid to know why. If Romney is nominated by the KNOW IT ALLS they will lose once again. Like the OLD time Democratic party they are split down the middle. just like the Strauss Democrats were in the old days. It was primarily why the Dems LOST one election after another. Samwe thing going to happen to the Repubs now.

  94. Typo Samwe= SAME sorry fat fingers sometimes hit wrong keys

  95. oldsalt79 | January 25, 2012 at 12:06 pm |
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++

    I remember it well. Karl Rove is the Liberal Socialists best buddy as well as the Liberal – reach in the middle RINO’s. And you are correct. So long as they keep this up, none will fully take control of either houses and the Presidency.

    Karl Rove and the RINO’s need to go…

    Just my opinion though.

  96. Starla……………..
    I would say that Farah might be right. If Soetoro is NOT defeated in 2012, you can look for gasoline to get to $10.00 or more a gallon, and a loaf of bread to cost nearly $10.00. I sure hope all the DO GOODERS who support Soetoro like these really GREAT prices. I guess until Americans stop seeing LEFT as RIGHT, and stop believing the KNOW IT ALLS, everything will continue to get more and more expensive. At what point are Americans going to say enough is enough, and together do something meaningful about it instead of complain about it. You can be a SCHOOL TEACHER, a DOCTOR, A LAWYER, A MERCHANT, OR A CHIEF………..YOU CAN BE A RICHMAN ,A POORMAN, A BEGGARMAN OR A THIEF. BUT BEFORE YOU CAN BE ANY OF THEM SUCCESSFULLY YOU NEED TO KNOW LEFT FROM RIGHT.

  97. JUST IN….

    Two Court Victories for Standing for Ordinary Voters in Election Law Lawsuits.

    http://www.ballot-access.org/2012/01/25/two-court-victories-for-citizen-stan

    ding-in-election-law-lawsuits/

  98. Just got this email from Helen Tansey.
    I hope by now you have learned the hearing was moved yesterday, Tuesday, to 230 Peachtree Street, NW. Go to http://www.riseupforamerica.com to get location details. Court starts at 9:00 am w/first to bat being Van Irion, then Hatfield and then Orly.

    Helen Tansey
    Director
    Article II Super PAC
    director@Art2SuperPAC
    804.840.1449

    http://www.art2superpac.com/donate.html

  99. Thanks LD,

    I was aware of the location change, but unaware the rotation of the cases were changed.

    The website to view the hearing live is still the same, correct?

  100. It sure looks as though the NWO has elready taken control of the Republican party. At least enough so.that they can control who becomes a potus candidate. Rove is one of the enemy’s talking heads,and the little boys,and girls who are prevailing in the Republican party,are Rove’s followers. Might as well be AXELROD. God what a name. If it was my surname I would change it very soon.

  101. oldsalt79 | January 25, 2012 at 12:41 pm |

    +++++++++++++++

    Correct, well put, and quite funny about Alexrod…

  102. should read:

    Axelrod.

  103. I wonder if his family had a Mechanic in their history? Axelrod…..

    too funny

  104. We can look for all sorts of twists and turns, WH expletives, lies, and anything that the DOJ thinks will delay the hearing. Look for repeated changes of venue,postponments etc. It will get so “watered down” that the judge will DISMISS it as a MOOT action.

  105. oldsalt79 | January 25, 2012 at 12:50 pm |

    We can look for all sorts of twists and turns, WH expletives, lies, and anything that the DOJ thinks will delay the hearing. Look for repeated changes of venue,postponments etc. It will get so “watered down” that the judge will DISMISS it as a MOOT action.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    OldSalt,

    Are you referring to the Ballot challenges?

  106. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    oldsalt – The only thing that comes to mind when I hear that name Axelrod is getting the SHAFT!!

    Another story that seems to have been buried by the MSM is the $1.2 BILLIOM disappearance from MF Global that was run by Corzine(N.J. Senator & Governor). 2 weeks before the collapse, his wife and he were trying to purchase an estate in France.

    https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&btnmeta_news_search=1&q=mf+global+news&oq=mf+global+news&aq=f&aqi=d1g2d-o1&aql=&gs_sm=s&gs_upl=3113l3113l0l4821l1l1l0l0l0l0l146l146l0.1l1l0#pq=mf+global+news&hl=en&sugexp=pfwl&tok=ehEPBXLJLyQul0-a_HW51w&ds=n&cp=24&gs_id=18&xhr=t&q=mf+global+news+%2B+Corzine&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&gl=us&tbm=nws&source=hp&pbx=1&oq=mf+global+news+%2B+Corzine&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=&gs_upl=&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.,cf.osb&fp=683280b395c6423e&biw=1333&bih=663

  107. William……………
    I seem to remember a Hollywood film producer whose surname was also Axelrod. I think that Axelrod was involved with the old Jim Arness Gunsmoke series. Because the political Axelrod seems to think in terms of LA LA LAND it might be that he is some sort of a relative to the film producer. Of course we all KNOW that HOLLYWOOD IS LA LA LAND. Perhaps even where all the FRUITS AND NUTS originate.

  108. Mr.Bill………………..
    Wouldn’t getting the shaft be something having a CERTAIN special meaning with regard to Soetoro. ….perhaps something like coming from the REAR. I think Sinclair mentioned it in his book. Of course Rahm knows what I am talking about.

  109. Mr. Bill(ms. helga) | January 25, 2012 at 12:53 pm |

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Corzine should get the Bernie Madoff treatment, then some.

  110. OH pardon me, I forgot to include Ram’s title……Please forgive me for not saying MISS Emmanual.

  111. I recently heard that Miss Emmanual holds the Shower Stall DROP THE SOAP CHAMPIONSHIP. She has BENT OVER more times than anyone else to retrieve the bar of soap, while showering with Soetoro.

  112. OldSalt,

    You are on a hilarious roll today of comparative analysis mixed with politics and history. You certainly have me laughing. What you are saying is the truth, but the comical way you are stating it has me rolling.

  113. OldSalt,

    You need to write a skit for SNL (Saturday Night Live) pertaining to this. It would be a huge hit….

  114. New Word

    Could not find it in my old Webster’s. Googled it and discovered it is a recently “coined” new word found in the Urban Dictionary and on T shirts being sold on eBay. Getting really close to the bone! Read this one over slowly and absorb the facts that totally are within this sentence!

    I love this word and believe that it will become a recognized English word. Or not………….

    Ineptocracy (in-ep-toc’-ra-cy) – a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.

    (Also see Thugocracy)

  115. Tommorow is: V O O Day !

    That’s right Victory Over Obama Day…… hopefully Judge Malaki will not sale out our Constitution.as those other weasel FEDERAL judges did.

    REMINDER…. be sure to tune in at 9am for gavel to gavel coverage brought to you by Art2Superpac. com….don’t forget”voo day” is your day !

    If the citizens win tomorrow, I hope some politician will consider making the 26th of Jan a National Holiday. Maybe we could call it “Constitution Day”…….after all, we have a MLK day.

    It should be a very informative day…perhaps the most important day America has had in over three years.

  116. RUBA DUB DUB TO MEN IN A TUB………………

  117. another typo SORRY TO SHOULD BE ” TWO”

  118. RMinNC,

    Thanks for the weblink.

  119. oldsalt79 | January 25, 2012 at 11:10 am |
    FYI………………
    About 20 minutes ago I was watching the Giffords resignation in the Senate chamber. The cameraman briefly focused on Pelosi. Guess what! She now, and once again has the old straight hairdo,and once again has the usual expression on her face. This all CONFIRMS that the woman in the interview video posted last night is a Pelosi PHONEY.
    ***********************
    Old Salt, when you mentioned Pelosi’s interview earlier, I went back and looked at the video with John King. I see exactly what you mean but thought it might be the “latest” of her face redos. However, I agree with you, that this has to either be an impostor, OR, perhaps, she fixed herself up so that she could claim it was an impostor. That would enable her to disclaim association with her comments. She is one crooked gal in any event!

  120. OldSalt,

    A joke for you.

    Dear Abby,

    I have always wanted to have my family history traced, but I can’t afford to spend a lot of money to do it. Any suggestions?”

    Sam in California….

    Dear Sam,

    Yes, register as a Republican, and run for public office.

    Abby…

  121. oldsalt79 | January 25, 2012 at 12:41 pm |
    Might as well be AXELROD. God what a name. If it was my surname I would change it very soon.
    ***************************
    Just can’t help laughing, Old Salt, because thinking about a name-change for AXELROD, reminds me of an old joke. It seems that there was a person by the name of John Stinko, whose friends convinced him to get a name change. So after much persuasion, John Stinko went before the judge, who said he could certainly understand the need for a change. “What would you like it changed to?” “James Stinko”, said he.
    I wonder if AXELROD would be of the same limited mental capacity?

  122. A Crazy Old Coot

    http://​thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/​2012/01/​georgia-update-from-carl-swenss​on.html

    Now they want to play musical courtrooms. This has to be a tactic initiated by Jablonski whether he takes credit for it or not. Regardless, Thursday’s hearing WILL occur. Fulton County is a DEM stronghold. Make sure everybody sees this ASAP.

    In my humble opinion, it would appear that this kind of tactic is all they have in their arsenal. Hoping that people won’t or can’t show up because they don’t know where to go.

  123. William……………..
    Getting a exacting SNL skit would be pretty tough to do. It would be considered as PORN. Of course we could show the two of them showering with one of them bending over,and the other standing up with his groin against the other person’s rear. Could that be seen as pornographic? Maybe not porno but certainly WOULD PORTRAY SOME very QUEER activity in a shower………but you must understand that “Drop the Soap” is a very QUEER game to begin with.

  124. Last joke, then back to the important issues.

    Its an Obama joke, and a little Johnny one. But there is truth in it, which makes it funnier, least to me. it goes:

    The kids filed into class Monday morning. They were very excited.
    Their weekend assignment was to sell something, then give a talk on productive salesmanship.

    Little Sally led off: “I sold girl scout cookies and I made $30″ she said proudly, “My sales approach was to appeal to the customer’s civil
    spirit and I credit that approach for my obvious success.” “Very good” said the teacher.

    Little Jenny was next: “I sold magazines” she said, “I made $45 and I
    explained to everyone that magazines would keep them up on current events. Very good, Jenny said the teacher..

    Eventually, it was Little Johnny’s turn. The teacher held her breath ..
    Little Johnny walked to the front of the classroom and dumped a box
    full of cash on the teacher’s desk. “$2,467″ he said.

    $2,467! cried the teacher, “What in the world were you selling?

    Toothbrushes” said Little Johnny.

    Toothbrushes echoed the teacher, How could you possibly sell enough tooth brushes to make that much money?

    I found the busiest corner in town” said Little Johnny, “I set up a Dip & Chip stand, I gave everybody who walked by a free sample.

    They all said the same thing, “Hey, this tastes like dog crap!” Then I would say, “It is dog crap. Wanna buy a toothbrush?

    I used the President Obama method of giving you something shitty, dressing it up so it looks good, telling you it’s free, and then making you pay to get the bad taste out of your mouth.

    Little Johnny got five stars for his efforts, bless his heart…

  125. BYE BYE time for me to get constructive.

  126. OldSalt,

    I understand. But still, that’s funny and the truth hurts. SNL would have a field day with it.

    Just my humor side of the thought though…

  127. THE KENYAN PARLIAMENT ADMITS OBAMA IS NOT A NATIVE-BORN IN THE USA AMERICAN CITIZEN. THE KENYAN PARLIAMENT PUBLICLY ACKNOWLEDGES & RECOGNIZES DURING KENYAN PARLIAMENT LEGAL GOVERNMENT PROCEEDINGS THAT OBAMA WAS BORN IN KENYA AND IS A SON OF THE SOIL OF KENYA

    * * * *

    The Current INS Officially Recognizes A Delineation Between Natural-Born and Native-Born.

    Excerpt:

    “Adding these official Interpretations of the INS, published at the official “.gov” site, to the Supreme Court’s opinion from Minor v. Happersett, the true Constitutional definition of a natural-born citizen, as one born in the country to citizen parents, is further reinforced.”

    See The Entire Article Here:

    http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2012/01/25/the-current-ins-officially-recognizes-a-delineation-between-natural-born-and-native-born/

    * * * *

    BARACK OBAMA’S CRIMINAL TIES TO KENYA?

  128. A Crazy Old Coot | January 25, 2012 at 2:07 pm |

    ++++++++++++++++++++++

    I agree,

    I still do not understand “who” initiated the change of location nor the “reasoning” behind the logic of it. Hopefully, that is explained to the public in the near future.

  129. MUST SEE OUTSTANDING VIDEOS!!

    KENYAN PARLIAMENT ADMITS OBAMA IS NOT A NATIVE AMERICAN AND IS A SON OF THE SOIL OF KENYA

    * * * *

    The Current INS Officially Recognizes A Delineation Between Natural-Born and Native-Born.

    Excerpt:

    “Adding these official Interpretations of the INS, published at the official “.gov” site, to the Supreme Court’s opinion from Minor v. Happersett, the true Constitutional definition of a natural-born citizen, as one born in the country to citizen parents, is further reinforced.”

    See The Entire Article Here:

    http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2012/01/25/the-current-ins-officially-recognizes-a-delineation-between-natural-born-and-native-born/

    * * * *

    BARACK OBAMA’S CRIMINAL TIES TO KENYA?

  130. CabbyAZ………………..
    Before I clearout I would like to add that even the eye set and certain facial features are not the same as Pelosi’s. In addition to this no matter what Pelosi says she always has her “weird” grimaces upon her face. Far too much difference to be MMMSSS. IMPORTANT herself.

  131. Speaking of faces…..I couldn’t stomach watching much of the speech lasst night, but I did catch one shot of (?)? sure looked like Barbara Boxer, but the surgical work done on whoever it was….was soooo bad, almost ghoulish. She never looked directly into the camera for too long so it was hard to tell. If it was MS Boxer, I would sue the plastic surgeon.

    On a side note, I thought the speech was an insult to any informed citizen.
    The man is a hypocrite to the bone. Did he think we are all that stupid?

    disgraceful……when will the pinochhios come out.

  132. Starla,

    I posted that link above from Leo’s site. It is an excellent read and discovery.

    My current thoughts are that its going to be extremely difficult for those such as Dr. Conspiracy and other Obots to claim that Native born equals Natural born and are identical legally and historically, which as always been their case of discussion.

    I also have a feeling in my gut that tells me Dr. Conspiracy and a few other leading Obots are burning up the phone lines with the INS dept. and a few others to quickly get this language changes ASAP….

  133. good satirical video explaining the federal debt.

  134. Should read:

    language changed ASAP.

  135. HonorFirst | January 25, 2012 at 2:39 pm |

    On a side note, I thought the speech was an insult to any informed citizen.The man is a hypocrite to the bone. Did he think we are all that stupid?

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    The answer is YES, and YES.

    What I did notice during the speech, is Boehner sitting in the background, rubbing his face, looking off in a distance, putting his head down, swiping his eyebrow, as if he wanted to jump up and scream….LIAR….

  136. Starla,

    My comment pertaining to Leo’s site is in moderation, Natural born citizen v. Native Citizen.

    I corrected “changes” to “changed” language, pertaining to the report.

  137. Everytime I mention starla or leo donofrio website my comment goes to moderation? that’s strange

  138. moderation test

  139. William, yes I noticed that about Boehner as well. Also, even some of the dems seemed to look down with almost a guilty look on their face. Especially when he spoke about the green energy bs and when he mentioned Holder…..They know what’s fixing to hit the fan!

    Hate to say it, but I got some sweet satisfaction by their collective demeanor.

  140. Leo Donfrio, test, test

  141. Leo Donofrio is an attorney at law… test..

  142. William @2:18pm
    Great joke. Hubby loved it too!

  143. A Crazy Old Coot

    Did anyone notice that with the “date night” program … Repubs sitting with dems so that when he got a standing ovation, it looked like everyone was standing. I thought it was funny that they didn’t want the repubs sitting down where everyone could see.

  144. SueQ | January 25, 2012 at 3:12 pm |
    William @2:18pm
    Great joke. Hubby loved it too!
    ************************
    It was so good that I e-mailed it to a friend! I knew William wouldn’t mind.

  145. A Crazy Old Coot | January 25, 2012 at 3:14 pm |
    Did anyone notice that with the “date night” program … Repubs sitting with dems so that when he got a standing ovation, it looked like everyone was standing. I thought it was funny that they didn’t want the repubs sitting down where everyone could see.
    ****************************
    Good observation, Coot! Truthfully this is the first time that I could barely bring myself to look at those assembled. We all have learned so much more about O and his minions than we did before.

    What really got to me last evening is the fact that they ALL KNOW……..and are too cowardly and spineless to do anything to stop the Usurper from driving us off of a cliff.
    I felt as though we were looking at a bunch of traitors……Just could not help it.

  146. A Crazy Old Coot | January 25, 2012 at 3:14 pm |

    +++++++++++++++++++++++

    Yes, I did, and I find it quite out of the normality during a SOTU speech. In fact, its near unprecedented. So what does that tell you? You can look at the reasoning below. But the real question, is why the Republican Controlled Congress even agreed to it in the first place?

    They were fully aware it would make Obama’s presentation enhanced. In other words, the Republican Party is fully supportive of Obama. Nothing is by accident – nor does one intentionally diminish opportunities against opponents.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/12/mark-udall-state-of-the-union_n_808204.html

    http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/01/12/senator-wants-changed-seating-for-state-of-the-union/

    http://www.fresnobee.com/2012/01/24/2694840/congress-opts-for-bipartisan-seating.html

    Just saying what needs to be said….

  147. Cabby,

    My dear friend,

    You never need my permission for anything. I would entrust you with my life decisions.

  148. A Crazy Old Coot

    It seems like we now have 2 parties….. Dems and Dems lite!

  149. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    And then there was this – At the end there is Boehner crying as usual.

    http://www.businessinsider.com/watch-congress-members-show-genuine-emotion-as-gabrielle-giffords-resigns-2012-1

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    GOD LOVE GABBY though!!

  150. MUST READ OUTSTANDING ARTICLES!!

    “KENYAN PARLIAMENT CLAIMS OBAMA BORN IN KENYA”

    “SO WHERE IS THE UNITED STATES MILITARY?”

    By Sharon Rondeau
    ThePostEmail.com
    April 11, 2010

    Excerpt:

    “(Apr. 11, 2010) — A member of the Kenyan Parliament has stated in a meeting of that body on March 25, 2010 that Barack Obama was born in Kenya.

    The statement, which discussed the concept of “devolution,” or ethnic inclusion, reads: “If America was living in a situation where they feared ethnicity and did not see itself as a multiparty state or nation, how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the President of America?” A screenshot of page 31 of the Minutes where the statement appears is below.”

    See The Entire Article & Links Here: http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/04/11/kenyan-parliament-claims-obama-born-in-kenya/

    * * * *

    “KENYAN PARLIAMENT PROCLAIMED OBAMA’S BIRTH THERE IN NOVEMBER 2008″

    “REPEATED REFERENCES TO OBAMA’S PURPORTED ORIGINS IN “OFFICIAL” DOCUMENTS, AS WELL AS KNOWLEDGE OF “ILLEGAL” ACTIVITY”

    Submitted by Terry R. Wiley
    ThePostEmail.com
    April 14, 2010

    “Kenya gained its independence from Great Britain in 1963 but was a de facto one-party nation from 1969 to 1982″

    Excerpt:

    “(Apr. 14, 2010) — While the March 25, 2010 Kenyan Parliament meeting Minutes, or Hansard, stated unequivocally that Barack Hussein Obama was born in that country, the topic had also been mentioned repeatedly at the Parliament session held one day after the U.S. presidential election.

    The following excerpts are from the Minutes of November 5, 2008, all containing references to Obama’s relationship to Kenya as expressed by members of the Parliament and entered into the official record. Items in bold were added by The Post & Email for emphasis.”

    See The Entire Article & Links Here:

    http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/04/14/kenyan-parliament-proclaimed-obamas-birth-there-in-november-2008/

  151. A Crazy Old Coot | January 25, 2012 at 3:56 pm |

    It seems like we now have 2 parties….. Dems and Dems lite!

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Makes you want to grab an Ale, sit back, and watch Dancing with the Stars in the WH doesn’t it…..

  152. BREAKING NEWS:

    Orley Taitz is reporting on her website (orleytaitzesquire.com) that OBAMA’s attorney Mr. JABLONSKI in a letter to BRAIN KEMP, secretary of State for the state of Georgia to take the case due to be heard tomorrow morning away from Judge Maliki’s authority.

    Jablonski also says in this rubbish letter that he is awaiting the SOS’s action and that HE WILL NOT BE ATTENDING THE HEARING TOMORROW PENDING THE SOS’s ACTION.

    Go to :ORLEYTAITZESQUIRE.COM FOR THE COMNPLETE LETTER.

    The chickens are getting restless……the big chicken has a 5 state campaign tour in the midwest.

  153. Can the judge have a hearing without both parties being represented?

  154. A Crazy Old Coot

    http://​obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspo​t.com/2012/01/​current-ins-officially-recogniz​es.html

    Then, Interpretation 324.2(a)(7) provides:

    “(7) Restoration of citizenship is prospective . Restoration to citizenship under any one of the three statutes is not regarded as having erased the period of alienage that immediately preceded it.

    The words “shall be deemed to be a citizen of the United States to the same extent as though her marriage to said alien had taken place on or after September 22, 1922″, as they appeared in the 1936 and 1940 statutes, are prospective and restore the status of native-born or natural-born citizen (whichever existed prior to the loss) as of the date citizenship was reacquired.” (Emphasis added.)

  155. And what about the VALID Judge’s signed orders addressed to Mr. Obama and his attorney, Mr. Jablonski…..

    Can Mr. Jablonski just ignore them too…..

    I hope Judge Maliki will throw Mr. Jablonski’s ass under the jail if he fails to show tomorrow morning…. then throws the key away!

    Not only is this “Above the Law” attitude shown with everything Obama is connected with, but apparently this same attitude has rubbed off on all who are associated with him.

    LAW…what LAW? Anyone who opposes Obama has no recourse to law and as far as anyone who approves of Obama’s actions …… the law does not apply.

  156. Bollyn, The Zionist Plot to Stop Ron Paul , INCREDIBLE !

    The Zionist Plot to Stop Ron Paul

    http://www.bollyn.com/index.php#article_13410

  157. Absolutely, we Christians and other Zionists want to stop Ron Paul! And we’re proud of it. He’s an anti-semite. How many times do we have to tell you!

  158. A Crazy Old Coot | January 25, 2012 at 3:56 pm |

    It seems like we now have 2 parties….. Dems and Dems lite!
    —————–
    We have for many many years had “Dems and Dems lite”. Charles Francis who used to write for the Washington Times called Republicans the “stupid party”. They move left only slightly slower than the Dems.
    People are catching on (I hope).

  159. Lest people forget what Zionism is, it rose in Europe because Jews were burned alive in temples in France. Jews were raped, murdered and tortured in Eastern Europe. They were made to live in their own ghettos. As a result, there was a longing by Jews to return to their homeland in Israel as Europeans would not protect them. Since Jews have re-established Israel, their historic homeland which they had for over 3,000 years before the Romans destroyed their country, they have been attacked over and over in wars and in horrible terrorism. Everyone should stand with Israel and should be a Zionist.

  160. “WILL OBAMA SHOW UP AT ELIGIBILITY HEARING?”

    “JUDGE WANTS PRESIDENT IN ATLANTA COURTROOM”

    By Bob Unruh
    WND.com
    January 25, 2012

    Excerpt:

    “It is STATES, usually through the OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF STATE, THAT RUN ELECTIONS, NOT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. The national election is simply a compilation of the results of the INDIVIDUAL ELECTIONS WITHIN STATES.

    The schedule for the hearings was set by Malihi of the Georgia state Office of State Administrative Hearings. In Georgia, STATE LAW REQUIRES “every candidate for federal” office who is certified by the state executive committees of a political party or who files a notice of candidacy “shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.”

    STATE LAW also grants the secretary of state and any “elector who is eligible to vote for a candidate” in the state the authority to raise a challenge to a candidate’s qualifications, the judge determined.” (emphasis is mine.)

    Read The Entire Article Here:

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/obama-to-miss-eligibility-hearing/

    * * * *

    A Comment Under This Article:
    amanda said:

    “More important than where he was born,,,, his school enrollment in Indonesia stating him to be an Indonesia citizen,,, so, since he was made Indonesian so he could be enrolled in school, he is an Indonesia citizen,,, i’ve seen nothing about him being naturalized on returning to Hawaii, but even if he were, he’s still not eligible to hold office. We DO need him to be forced from office so we don’t have to pay him $400,000.00 a year for the rest of his life……..”

    * * * *

  161. Moderation Test, 1, 2, 3….

  162. Old Coot,

    I responded to you, but its hung up in moderation.

  163. Sorry,

    I meant RMinNC,

    I responded to you, but its hung up in moderation.

  164. rminnc | January 25, 2012 at 4:16 pm |

    Can the judge have a hearing without both parties being represented?
    *********************************************************************************
    President Obama is not a party to the administrative hearing. Obviously, if he was a party to these proceedings, he would risk an adverse ruling by failing to appear (although the burden remains on Mr. Farrar to establish, SoS Kemp erred in refusing to remove Obama’s name from the GA ballot). And that points to the Respondent in this case: the Office of the SoS.

    Mr. Obama is Mr. Farrar’s witness. He issued a subpoena for Mr. Obama to appear, with documents, hoping this would help to establish he – Farrar – was right; Obama’s name should not be on the ballot.

    I explained all of this on my blog.

    http://jbjd.org/2012/01/24/witness-for-orlys-persecution/

  165. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    rminnc | January 25, 2012 at 4:15 pm |
    BREAKING NEWS:

    Orley Taitz is reporting on her website (orleytaitzesquire.com) that OBAMA’s attorney Mr. JABLONSKI in a letter to BRAIN KEMP, secretary of State for the state of Georgia to take the case due to be heard tomorrow morning away from Judge Maliki’s authority.

    Jablonski also says in this rubbish letter that he is awaiting the SOS’s action and that HE WILL NOT BE ATTENDING THE HEARING TOMORROW PENDING THE SOS’s ACTION.
    ______________________________________________

    This will only cause more people to get more curious. The more they stall, the MORE suspicious the people will become. The TRUTH shall win out.

  166. Tina,
    I stand with Israel. Always will. But I am a Christian. Not a Zionist. The restoration of the state of Israel is nothing short of a miracle.
    These last days will bring many Jews and Gentiles to a saving knowledge of our Lord Jesus.
    But let’s not forget, when the temple is restored and the sacrifices resume, it will in essence be a finger in God’s eye (or worse). The statement is… “Jesus was not enough… it is not truly finished… we want our animal sacrifices back.” Get my drift?

    Choose your identity Tina.

    Are you a child of God?

    Are you a Jew?

    Are you a Zionist?

  167. jbjd,

    I also think many, including myself, would like to know if the State of GA Executive Branch – SoS, has the Authority requested by Obama’s Attorney, to over-ride the Judicial Branch have all dismissed. This appears to me as completely unconstitutional on its face. One branch with Superior authority over another that is.

  168. RMinNC,

    I’ll try to repost my response to you that is still hung up in moderation.

    RMinNC,

    Well…….

    That is something I didn’t see coming.
    I am not an Attorney, but my understanding is that since this is a civil proceeding and not a criminal one, by not showing simply means a default in the Plaintiffs favor.

    But there are several more parts to this story. There are 3 hearings tomorrow, not just Orly’s. Yet Mr. Jablonski representing Obama Only discusses Orly’s case and Ignores the other 2 with the SOS letter?

    Additional, Mr. Jablonski flat out lied to the GA SOS by claiming past cases dismissed on reasons of proven facts, to summarize his emphasis.

    Can the SOS, under the State laws and U.S. Constitutional law – step in and dismiss a civil suit pending in front of a Judge all by himself? I don’t know the answer to that, but seems to me to be highly improbable. For one thing, they are 2 very different branches of Government. The SOS belongs to the Executive Branch and the Court belongs to the Judicial Branch. Since when is the Executive Branch allowed to override the Judicial branch, Constitutionally speaking? Is this Attorney that desperate and a Moron at the same time to request such a demand?

    The Attorney for Obama had all the right to issue a non-appearance on Obama’s behalf with a simple request. It would not have been turned down. Instead, he took the road of requesting the SOS personally override the GA Judicial system?

    You have got to be kidding me! Someone poke me.

    Look, it’s not difficult for Obama to issue his Attorney permission to represent him on his behalf in this hearing. Obama could have given his Attorney the paperwork requested by the Court. Most of it is needed to file for a Passport or a Job working with the U.S. Government.

    Its not difficult to produce these records, unless they don’t exist. And that is not a conspiracy theory. Ask any Criminal Attorney. If the records exist, produce them in court for examination, if you cannot produce them, then not in your favor. Not rocket science.

  169. RMinNC.

    I’ll try to repost my response to you that is still hung up in moderation.

  170. Sorry RMinNC,

    it didn’t post and hung up again.

    I don’t know why, but today I have been hung up in moderation more in a single day that all my postings over a couple of months.

    Strange.

  171. should be, than all my postings…..

    Discouraged from any more postings, hanging it up tonight. Hopeful a better tomorrow of not being in and out of moderation to have a simple discussion and postings.

  172. I don’t want to argue with you, Sue Q, but I stand with Israel. Period. That’s non-negotiable for me. While I am a social conservative and a Christian, I recognize that Jesus was a Jew who preached from the Torah. Some of my family came from parts of Eastern Europe and witnessed some of the worst of the pogroms in the 1800’s. Later, during the Holocaust, Hitler did not just go after the Jews. He also went after Catholics. I had relatives, who were not Jews, but were in forced Nazi labor camps. One died there. My own father fought with the US Navy against the German subs during D day during WWII. He saw the American men going down all around him in combat drowning in the water. That’s why we said never again and marched with MLK, Jr. during the civil rights era. I want a candidate running for POTUS who is unafraid and proud of their support for Israel. It’s a matter of principle and who we are. With Obama, the tide of anti-semitism is rising and the winds of war are blowing again against Israel, in my opinion. That was one reason why I crossed over from being a Democrat to the GOP. But I will not support a candidate, even Mitch Daniels, whom the elites love, who is very cool to Israel. That is my humble opinion.

  173. Tina @ 6:38
    Well said. God bless you.

  174. Thanks, SueQ. God bless you too.

  175. Pat 1789 | January 25, 2012 at 7:57 am | http://obamaballotchallenge.com/obama-enters-motion-to-strike-and-dismiss-illinois-ballot-challenge
    —————————————————————————–
    I find it quite strange that few comment on the fact that Obama’s attorney’s enetered his BC-JPEG into evidence in an illinois ballot case but refuse to show up in court in GA.

    Also no comments on this blog concerning this case.

    Maybe the Illinois case is a set up to get the JPEG on record and the Plantiff will fade away, like the Akeny Indiana case.

  176. On the eve of Obama’s eligibility hearing Leo Donofrio reveals a new nail in Obama’s coffin
    Existing US Law on INS .gov Website Says Obama is Ineligible

    http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2012/01/25/the-current-ins-officially-recognizes-a-delineation-between-natural-born-and-native-born/

  177. Pingback: Obama FL ballot challenge, Florida advisory opinion, Abdul Hassan and Obama not natural born citizens, Litigation or contested election | Citizen WElls

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s