Obama NC ballot challenge, GA ruling Judge Michael Malihi, North Carolina Secretary of State and Election Board warned in 2008, Governor Easley conviction

Obama NC ballot challenge, GA ruling Judge Michael Malihi, North Carolina Secretary of State and Election Board warned in 2008, Governor Easley conviction

“Why has Obama, since taking the White House, used Justice Department Attorneys, at taxpayer expense,  to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells

“Why did Obama employ Robert Bauer of Perkins Coie, to request an advisory opinion on FEC matching funds that he was not eligible for?”…Citizen Wells

“Why is Obama now employing private attorneys to keep his name on state ballots, despite compelling evidence that he is not a natural born citizen?…Citizen Wells

It is timely and appropriate to reprint an article from 2008 on NC election law. In 2008 I contacted the NC Secretary of State’s office as well as the Board of elections multiple times. I provided information about the Philip J. Berg lawsuit as well as Obama eligibility concerns. The gentleman from the Board of Elections office was aware of the lawsuit. One of the state officers listed in the article, former Governor Mike Easley, has since been indicted and convicted of other crimes. His successor, Beverly Perdue, an Obama Democrat, was recently cited for receiving government employment reports prematurely. She has just indicated she will not run for office again.

I just perused the NC Election statutes looking for any significant changes and found none. NC still has a reference to replacing an ineligible candidate but no clear protocol for challenges. The state of Georgia is to be commended for provisions allowing ballot challenges in accordance with the US Constitution. We await a ruling from Judge Michael Malihi in GA on such challenges to Obama’s eligibility.

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2012/01/26/judge-michael-malihi-ruling-obama-ga-ballot-challenges-january-26-2012-summary-judgement-entered-brian-p-kemp-georgia-secretary-of-state/

Of course, the Democrat National Convention will be held in Charlotte, NC this year. You can bet that the State of NC will prioritize that event over upholding the US Constitution.

Politics as usual.

There are some challenges underway in NC and I will keep you apprised of their progress. More information can be found here:

http://obamaballotchallenge.com/complaint-in-nc-underway

http://obamaballotchallenge.com/election-complaint-filed-in-north-carolina-nc-page-updated-with-law

The State of NC was warned in 2008, ignorance is no excuse.

From Citizen Wells November 17, 2008.

NC State Officers and Election Officials are in Violation of the Law
2008 Presidential Election

Eligibility for presidency

US Constitution
Article II
Section 1

“No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.”

How President is elected

UNITED STATES ELECTION LAW

“The following provisions of law governing Presidential Elections are contained in Chapter 1 of Title 3, United States Code (62 Stat. 672, as amended):

§ 8.   The electors shall vote for President and Vice President, respectively, in the manner directed by the Constitution.”

The states are responsible for the primaries, general election and events leading up to the Electoral College vote

US Constitution
Article II
Section 1

“Each state shall appoint, in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a number of electors, equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or person holding an office of trust or profit under the United States, shall be appointed an elector.”

NC Officials responsible for upholding the US Constitution and Federal and State Election Laws

Governor Mike Easley has overall responsibilities as well as Electoral College certification.

Attorney General Roy Cooper is charged with compliance with all Federal and State laws.

Secretary Elaine Marshall is responsible for the NC Election process.

NC Board of Elections is responsible for the NC Election process.

NC Electoral College Electors are responsible for complying with Federal and State laws.

NC Judges ruling on election matters are bound to uphold the US Constitution and Federal and State laws.

Laws that apply to NC State Officials

US Constitution, Article II, Section 1. Presidential eligibility.

US Constitution, Article II, Section 1. States are responsible for Presidential Elections up to Electoral College vote.

Federal Election Law dictates that Electors must vote in a “manner directed by the Constitution.”

Article VI of the US Constitution states:

“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislators, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by
Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution;”

NC Statute § 163-114.  Filling vacancies among party nominees occurring after nomination and before election.

“If any person nominated as a candidate of a political party for one of the offices listed below (either in a primary or convention or by virtue of having no opposition in a primary) dies, resigns, or for any reason becomes ineligible or disqualified before the date of the ensuing general election, the vacancy shall be filled by appointment according to the following instructions:
Position

President 

Vacancy is to be filled by appointment of national executive
committee of political party in which vacancy occurs”

NC Statute § 163‑19.  State Board of Elections; appointment; term of office; vacancies; oath of office.

“At the first meeting held after new appointments are made, the members of the State Board of Elections shall take the following oath:

I, __________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States; that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to the State of North Carolina, and to the constitutional powers and authorities which are or may be established for the government thereof; that I will endeavor to support, maintain and defend the Constitution of said State, and that I will well and truly execute the duties of the office of member of the State Board of Elections according to the best of my knowledge and ability, according to law, so help me, God.”
NC Statute § 163‑23.  Powers of chairman in execution of Board duties.

“In the performance of the duties enumerated in this Chapter, the chairman of the State Board of Elections shall have power to administer oaths, issue subpoenas, summon witnesses, and compel the production of papers, books, records and other evidence. Upon the written request or requests of two or more members of the State Board of Elections, he shall issue subpoenas for designated witnesses or identified papers, books, records and other evidence. In the absence of the chairman or upon his refusal to act, any two members of the State Board of Elections may issue subpoenas, summon witnesses, and compel the production of papers, books, records and other evidence. In the absence of the chairman or upon his refusal to act, any member of the Board may administer oaths. (1901, c. 89, s. 7; Rev., s. 4302; C.S., s. 5923; 1933, c. 165, s. 1; 1945, c. 982; 1967, c. 775, s. 1; 1973, c. 793, s. 4.)”

The following facts and conclusions are self evident:

  • The State of NC, State Officials and Election Officials are responsible for the Presidential Election in NC up to and including the vote by the Electoral College Electors of NC.
  • The Electoral College Electors of NC are bound by the US Constitution and Federal and State Election law to vote for an eligible presidential candidate.
  • The Governor’s office, the Secretary of State’s office, the NC State Board of Elections and the Electoral College of NC has been notified in public and private of major issues surrounding the eligibility of
    Barack Obama.
  • The office of the Secretary of State and Board of Elections was notified multiple times, prior to the general election, of the Philip J Berg lawsuit and facts regarding Barack Obama’s ineligibility. The
    notification was via telephone conversation and emails as well as notification on the internet. The Board of Elections stated they had been aware of these issues for several months.
  • There are pending lawsuits in NC courts, other state courts, as well as US Supreme Court, challenging the eligibilty of Barack Obama.
  • Barack Obama has refused to supply legal proof of eligibility.
  • Pending or dismissed lawsuits have no bearing on the obligation of NC officials to uphold the rule of law.
  • Failure of NC officials to uphold the law and their election duties may result in the disenfranchisement of millions of voters.
  • The state of NC has complete control of the presidential election process in NC up to and including the Electoral College vote.
  • Placing a candidate on the ballot at the direction of a major political party does not relieve NC election officials of their duty to ensure eligibility of candidates.
  • The state of NC in NC Statute § 163-114 provides for replacing a candidate that “for any reason becomes ineligible or disqualified”.
  • The Tenth Amendment to the US Constitution gives power to the people not reserved for the federal government or the states.
  • The laws on the books not only allow, but require that NC officers and Elections Officials demand proof from any presidential candidate of eligibility.

If the officers and Election Officials do not perform their legal obligation to demand proof of eligibility from Barack Obama or any other presidential candidate, they will be subject to one or more of the following:

  • Prosecution
  • Lawsuit
  • Impeachment
  • Recall
  • Expulsion
  • Dismissal

Citizen Wells will be providing this information to the officers and Election officials of NC. If a satisfactory answer is not received soon, petitions will be initiated to remove non compliant officials from office. Judges are not immune.

What is the alternative?

The answer is in the Declaration of Independence.
 
 
 
About these ads

264 responses to “Obama NC ballot challenge, GA ruling Judge Michael Malihi, North Carolina Secretary of State and Election Board warned in 2008, Governor Easley conviction

  1. I have a strange feeling, this site will once again become a bash fest.

    Sigh, and to think I was going to make a post the other day on how the exchanges here finally returned to the great discussions we knew. …no animosity, no childish bantering!

    Now we are being visited by ghosts from the past. Sounds of desperation
    and a clear sign of Alinsky…Be prepared to be overwhelmed with
    unnecessary and un civil retorts.

    Frankly Im too busy right now to have to weed through the nonsense.

  2. WOW! The patriots who supported our military in St Louis yesterday surpassed those who attended the St Louis 2011 Veterans Day parade. I marched in the parade last November and it was disappointing to see the sparse turn-out. But the support for our troops yesterday was heartwarming.

    First in the Nation… THOUSANDS Turn Out For St. Louis Iraq War Heroes Parade (Video)

    St. Louis held the first “Welcome Home the Heroes” parade in St. Louis, Missouri.

    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/01/thousands-in-st-louis-turn-out-for-iraq-war-vets-parade/

  3. Whomever our nominee is, most likely either be Mitt or Newt, they are going to be slammed by Obama who will play the race card every chance he gets. The GOP is going to have to be willing to attack back and that includes on personal issues too. Obama’s supporters have already said they are going to kill Mitt. Obama’s calls for civility only seem to apply to other people. If the GOP runs the same type of gentleman campaign that John McCain ran, we will be in big trouble.

  4. HELP!!
    I’m in moderation and I can’t get out!
    Jonah | January 29, 2012 at 11:19 am |

  5. WOW ! CW
    Powerfull stuff.
    They had better pay attention this time.
    Congrats in advance.

  6. jbjd.
    I have looked multiple times.
    There is no rhyme or reason as to why some of your comments are going into moderation.

  7. HonorFirst,

    I was waiting for the major R.A.P. lunacy to begin again. Still holding my breath.

  8. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    CW – “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President”

    What gets my goat is that most people who read this think that “OR A CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES” is the PROOF he is legit. Someone is not teaching the people to understand their own English! They only see what they want to see.

  9. I was unaware of the MA ballot challenge by LTC Reade. Here is his complaint to SoS Bill Galvin. This is an excellent summary:

    http://obamaballotchallenge.com/taxachussets-ballot-challenge-by-retired-army-officer

    Will be watching this one in addition to all other ballot challenges. Unfortunately, I don’t think this one will have legs in Liberal moonbat MA.

  10. THANK you SO much for keeping track of this. I am following it closely and urging everyone to do a little self-eucation on the issue. Purposeful ignorance is a crime.

    Do you think that Judge Malihi will fold? I can only imagine the pressure he is under.

  11. HonorFirst
    All one can really do is to maintain composure, be objective, and continue to use the site as a platform for exchange of information and spirited debate. I agree that the debate does get a bit too spirited but sometimes, within the heated dialoge, there are indeed useful and perhaps unintended pearls. I would submit that you continue to contribute anyway as the offenders, by way of their own dialogue, have exposed themselves. Diatribe is easily spotted and evaluated accordingly. Posting facts is far more informative than trying to convince someone who’s mind is made up…..IMHO

  12. coldwarvet | January 29, 2012 at 12:09 pm |

    Well stated! I will not be intimidated by those that choose to incite hatefulness here. I don’t know how long you have been an observer here, but there were times when any discourse became impossible.
    I enjoy reading all the open minded opinions of most everyone that frequents this site. But there are some that make deliberate visits just to
    confuse the issues. They may have well intended points, but their manner of debating the issues becomes nasty, vile and unnecessary. It soon becomes unrelenting and very childish. I hope all that post here will maintain a sense of decency, say what they have to say and be done with it. We are all too busy to tolerate nasty comments.

  13. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    PS
    I think it has become an ego thing with the voters. No one wants to be thought of as a fool or having been taken advantage of. This has to be the cause of their animosity shown toward the Birthers. They don’t realize that when this document was signed almost everyone’s parents came from overseas.

  14. “I think it has become an ego thing with the voters. No one wants to be thought of as a fool or having been taken advantage of.”
    Mr. Bill,
    I used to think that it was an ego thing but I can remember a time, recently, when you literally couldn’t find anyone that voted for (or would admit to voting for) “the one”…Now it appears that there are those that are rabid in their support for an obviously flawed presidency.
    I would submit to you then, as I have in a previous post, that there are just a lot of folks out there so involved with the process of survival that they just don’t have the time to see the forest for the trees. I also believe that this state of affairs was/is intentional from the outset, of at least this administration but, more likely, has been coming about for a very long time. Additionally, I believe that this is the handiwork of both the parties who have, by virtue of manipulation of the system, built a sponsored bastion of power in D.C., as well as the states, and are now prepared to use that power.

  15. Allen West: Obama, Pelosi, Reid… “Get the Hell Out of the United States of America” (Video)
    Posted by Jim Hoft on Sunday, January 29, 2012, 10:33 AM

    West tells Democrats where to go…
    Rep. Allen West (R-FL) spoke at the annual Lincoln Day Dinner in Palm Beach last night. He told Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and Debbie Wasserman Schultz to “Get the Hell Out of America!”

    The Huffington Post reported:
    Speaking to a Lincoln Day Dinner in West Palm Beach for the Palm Beach County GOP, Rep. Allen West (R-Fla) fired off a humdinger of a line that within minutes drew recriminations from Democrats on Twitter.

    “We need to let President Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, (audience boos) and my dear friend the chairman of the Democrat National Committee, we need to let them know that Florida ain’t on the table,” West said. “Take your message of equality of achievement, take your message of economic dependency, take your message of enslaving the entrepreneurial will and spirit of the American people somewhere else. You can take it to Europe, you can take it to the bottom of the sea, you can take it to the North Pole, but get the hell out of the United States of America.”

    Following cheers, West added, “Yeah I said ‘hell.’“

    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/01/allen-west-obama-pelosi-reid-get-the-hell-out-of-the-united-states-of-america-video/

  16. An embedded Allen West video has me in moderation again……
    Ya gotta see this one. Allen West is my choice for VP.

    Jonah | January 29, 2012 at 12:52 pm |

  17. citizenwells | January 29, 2012 at 11:46 am |

    jbjd.
    I have looked multiple times.
    There is no rhyme or reason as to why some of your comments are going into moderation.
    **********************************************************************************
    Thank you; and I agree.

  18. HonorFirst
    Another P.S. if you will..
    I empathize with your feelings about being set upon by the zealots here…
    When all this hoopla began, back pre-Obama….I began, for the first time, to blog at another site and was so set upon that I quit due to the fact that I felt I wasn’t informed enough to participate. As a result, I took a hiatus in the hope of discovering the things I would need to survive out here in the blogosphere. My conclusion, in retrospect, was that I was right all along but allowed myself to become intimidated. The problem, as I see it now, was that I knew I was right but I wasn’t quite sure why I was right . It was about that time I discovered the CW site and I must admit, it has helped immensely with this problem…..being informed.
    Being informed, in this day and age, takes a lot of time and effort. More than the average person is willing or able to commit to. The result…. the uninformed…and when propagandized, they will be almost impossible to reach. When they finally SEE the err to their ways, it will be too late. The most unfortunate thing is ….they vote! Again I submit….that this is by design.

  19. Pete | January 29, 2012 at 12:08 am |

    When asked by Crazy old Coot about how many US citizen parents it takes to be Natural born citizen JBJD responds, and I quote:
    >>>>JBJD
    I don’t have to think about it. The Constitution confirms in the 14th Amendment, for everyone who thought citizenship only applied to the relationship between the individual states and their residents; U.S. citizenship, native natural born, applies to everyone born here (except foreign embassy staffers, etc.)..<<<<<

    JBJD,
    For the record, right now on this blog, are you officially stating that you believe that Native Born is identical to Natural Born because of the 14th Amendment? You appear to be refuting Leo Donofrio's Amicus Brief (Now accepted into court record) here, but not on his blog where his challenge stands for all lawyers. I don't want to 'assume' and I would like you to state this all in simple language for all here to see.

    Pete
    ******************************************************************************
    I absolutely am stating unequivocally: nowhere in law is there any requirement that natural born as this term appears in Art. 2 sec. 1 means, born here of 2 citizen parents. I am not opining as to the original intent of the drafters of that document. What they thought would likely be considered by a federal appellate court asked to rule on this issue in a case on point; but until that happens, no definition exists.

    And, I am stating unequivocally, Minor did use the terms "native" and "natural born" side by side to describe people with her same birth circumstances.

    Finally, let me clarify something. When I give an opinion as to the law, on this blog, I tend not to repeat the article I write on my blog. Because over there, I not only link to the appropriate law but, more and more lately, actually post a picture of the law, because there is so much misinformation being heaped on everyone and, not everyone takes the time and trouble to investigate.

    This GA ballot challenge is being conducted in an administrative hearing, and not in a court of law. The statute that created the GA Office of State Administrative Hearings less than 15 years ago explicitly describes, this is part of the Executive branch of government. The law is also quite clear: the Administrative Law Judge has no authority to rule on issues that fall outside of its mandate, specifically mentioning as one of those areas of law, the Constitutionality of an issue.

    The only reason I explain things the way I do is that I hope at least at some point, people stop sitting on the sidelines, and, armed with this information, petition their own government to act accordingly, instead of cheering on others who claim to fighting on their behalf.

  20. In moderation at 1:28.

  21. citizenwells | January 29, 2012 at 11:46 am |

    jbjd.
    I have looked multiple times.
    There is no rhyme or reason as to why some of your comments are going into moderation.
    **********************************************
    Have you considered, sabotage by the obots/Google?

  22. bob strauss | January 29, 2012 at 1:30 pm |

    citizenwells | January 29, 2012 at 11:46 am |

    jbjd.
    I have looked multiple times.
    There is no rhyme or reason as to why some of your comments are going into moderation.
    **********************************************
    Have you considered, sabotage by the obots/Google?
    *******************************************************************
    No, but know what’s interesting? Previously, I would check the site alexa, occasionally, to see who is viewing my blog. They used to mention that while my overall numbers are modest; my readership in Washington, D.C. is quite high. I mentioned this on my blog; and they stopped providing this information, right after that. I am not saying, this illustrates cause and effect; I just found it interesting. Also, until recently, when I Googled “jbjd,” I seldom came up with more than 200,000 hits. But recently, this produces anywhere from 34,000 to more than 1,000,000 hits!

    It’s just frustrating that when I am responding to a question on this blog, which is directed to me, specifically; my answers are so often in moderation (lately).

  23. Mifouf | January 29, 2012 at 12:06 pm |

    THANK you SO much for keeping track of this. I am following it closely and urging everyone to do a little self-eucation on the issue. Purposeful ignorance is a crime.

    Do you think that Judge Malihi will fold? I can only imagine the pressure he is under.
    *************************************************************
    Self-education means, understanding who bears the burden of proof in this administrative hearing; and knowing whether the ALJ must accept as true Petitioners’ claims, just because Respondent did not show up.

    Personally, I don’t think ALJ Malihi feels pressure insofar as making his decision, according to the administrative rules. However, given the internet campaign to get people outside of GA to contact his office; I can imagine, he feels pressure at not giving the mob what it demands.

  24. Another “confrontation”. It’s a good thing he didn’t point his finger to make a point or else the media would have used it to twist the meaning….again. Since he didn’t the truth contained here will never see the light of day of the MSM:

    http://www.breitbart.tv/brown-to-obama-insider-trading-bill-sitting-on-reids-desk-right-now/

    Brown To Obama: Insider Trading Bill Sitting On Reid’s Desk Right NowJanuary 29, 2012 at 9:44 am – Fox News
    Dateline: Washington DC
    Sen. Scott Brown (R-MA) walked right up to President Obama after this week’s State of the Union address and let him know that Democrat Leader Harry Reid was standing in the way of the STOCK Act from reaching the floor for a vote. This was right after Obama had called for such legislation in his address.

  25. The Flame, Allen West

  26. jbjd, I read your work that puts the burden on Obama, to prove he’s worthy of being on the ballot, and it sounds like a great idea.

    Is it too late to file an amicus brief to Malihi for his consideration, along with the others, due Feb 1?

  27. CW…is there a reason why comments with youtube videos attached keep going into moderation??? Just wondering??? Thank you!

  28. Just for the record William…I did answer you comments on the last thread…

    William | January 29, 2012 at 10:25 am |

    Just to note,

    Ron Paul will not win the Nomination. Ron Paul will soon drop out. Ron Paul will not run on a third party ticket. For not doing so, the established GOP will promise Ron Paul a “Speakers Position” at the 2012 GOP Convention.

    No matter how many Ron Paul fans are upset and still trying to push to gain more supporters for him, it simply is not there, never was there, and never will be.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Ron Paul is NOT dropping out…..he said so again this morning and his support is growing by the day….people who REALLY love this country want someone they can trust….the only one who is consistent, unwavering and uncorruptable is Dr. Paul…..he is and will be our “MR. SMITH GOES TO WASHINGTON”! IMO and the opinion of many…..It will be Dr. Paul or BO…..time to buck up and make the choice GOP or go into extinction!

  29. jacqlynsmith | January 29, 2012 at 2:42 pm |

    CW…is there a reason why comments with youtube videos attached keep going into moderation??? Just wondering??? Thank you!
    *************************************
    JS, that issue is being discussed right now.

  30. Of course, here is THE man calling for action:
    Ron Paul calls for criminal charges against Eric Holder.

    http://www.examiner.com/charleston-conservative-in-charleston-sc/ron-paul-calls-for-criminal-charges-against-eric-holder

  31. Okay….thank you bob! :)

  32. bob strauss | January 29, 2012 at 2:41 pm |

    jbjd, I read your work that puts the burden on Obama, to prove he’s worthy of being on the ballot, and it sounds like a great idea.

    Is it too late to file an amicus brief to Malihi for his consideration, along with the others, due Feb 1?
    ******************************************************************************
    Just to clarify, I recommend that, whatever action a citizen initiates to address Obama’s Constitutional eligibility for POTUS, that action should never require the Petitioner/Plaintiff to establish, he is not a NBC. What Plaintiff/Petitioner can establish is, no one who swore he is a NBC can establish, that oath was based on documentary evidence available in the public record AT THE TIME THE OATH WAS MADE.

    The legal burden of proof is established, by law, in whatever proceeding, whether judicial or administrative. So, you have to see who has the burden of proof and then, tailor your complaint and supporting argument so that you retain the burden to prove what you charge.

    In other words, charging Obama is not a NBC is a losing case.

    In ballot challenges, depending on the laws of the state, the burden might be on you; or on the SoS. Find out who bears the burden; and tailor your case accordingly. In GA, Petitioners could have made the winning case I proposed all along; except, they turned this into a referendum as to whether he was eligible to be on the ballot, instead of whether given the rules that exist; the SoS should have kept him off.

    I spell this out the latest article on my blog.

    As for amicus briefs, this is a waste of time. No one will read them. This is why, in a court of law, BEFORE the court will accept an amicus brief, the petitioning party needs permission from the court for such submission. (Use your head; do you think a brief from an unknown person claiming to be an attorney merits the court’s consideration?)

    Besides, as I have said, under the law, ALJ’s cannot consider Constitutional issues. Ha; they don’t even have to have law degrees, but (presumably) some expertise in administrative rules and regulations and agency function!

  33. Moderation at 2:41.

  34. One of the BEST quotes ever…..and more proof the doc is on the side of WE THE PEOPLE….

    Dr. Ron Paul Quote

    “The moral and constitutional obligations of our representatives in Washington are to protect our liberty, not coddle the world, precipitating no-win wars, while bringing bankruptcy and economic turmoil to our people.”

  35. For those of you who are awake and familiar with David Wilcock….this will come as NO surprise…..

    NEW UPDATE! David Wilcock “Financial Tyranny” Section 5 is Here!!… “THE MASS ARRESTS HAVE ALREADY STARTED”
    Posted on January 28, 2012

    This is a most important update (well, which one of David’s articles is not important). Full of information, new photos, etc. Wow, is all I can say.

    David writes this update statement.

    “[UPDATE SATURDAY 1/28: Section Five has now been released. It is massive — and highly fascinating, with a great deal of extremely sensitive information that may be very surprising to a lot of people.

    “I hope that Section Six will follow very soon afterwards, but I wanted to get this out now — because we’ve had so many people eagerly awaiting it, and the mass arrests have already started.

    Continues here…..

    http://kauilapele.wordpress.com/

  36. “Personally, I don’t think ALJ Malihi feels pressure insofar as making his decision, according to the administrative rules. However, given the internet campaign to get people outside of GA to contact his office; I can imagine, he feels pressure at not giving the mob what it demands.”
    ——————————————————————————————-

    JB is right once in awhile,

    All those Taitz zombies will snatch defeat out of the jaws of victory, going full nutter on the judge.

  37. A little info about moderation. Google; WordPress moderation for more info. I know Google has gone out of it’s way to help Obama. I wonder if they are messing with CW’s site too.
    *************************

    Codex

    Codex tools: Log in
    Awaiting Moderation SubPanel
    This article may be outdated and contain information pertaining to an older version of WordPress. Please take caution when following the procedure, as many things may have changed.
    Comments → Awaiting Moderation

    This Awaiting Moderation SubPanel handles comments which have been marked for Comment Moderation. These are those which WordPress has decided might be spam (to define how WordPress decides this, see the Discussion SubPanel). Such comments are not displayed on your site until you approve them (or until another user with the authority does so)

    http://codex.wordpress.org/Awaiting_Moderation_SubPanel

  38. Doesn’t WordPress have it’s own rules on video links? CW is using WordPress as the blogging platform. I think that is the issue. It doesn’t allow copywrited materials and I think there is a charge to put up certain videos, but I don’t know about links to videos.

  39. JBJD,
    Majority opinion from Minor vs Happensett by Justice Waite 1874.
    ……..They are persons, and by the fourteenth amendment “all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” are expressly declared to be “citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” ……………
    ……The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners…..

    The words of the SCOTUS are hard to ignore, feel free to read the opinion yourself. The 14th Amendment granted Citizenship, not Natural Born Citizenship. Chief Justice goes further, in the second paragraph to define, without doubt, who is Natural Born…..”never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners”.

    The remaining examples are in question. Those that are Natural Born Citizens are never doubted “children born in country of parents who were its citizens”. Obama has claimed to be a foreign citizenship into adulthood, even IF born on US soil (and not ‘registered’) he has a disputed birth. The claim made by those in Georgia is sound, his father was British and Obama claimed British birth, he does not qualify as ‘never doubted NBC’.

    The 14th Amendment NEVER gave Natural Born Citizenship to anyone, but it did allow slaves CHILDREN born after it’s enactment to be Natural Born Citizens. This is similar to the POTUS born before 1790, whom needed a provision to accept the office.

    Pete

  40. It is time for violations of public servants’ oath of office be prosecuted. What is the criminal penalty for perjury?

  41. More info on moderation.
    **************************

    Comment Moderation
    Comment moderation is a feature in WordPress that allows you to prevent comments from appearing on your site without your express approval. Moderation can be very useful in addressing Comment Spam, but it has more general applications as well. If you would like to learn more about comment spam, see Fighting Comment Spam.

    http://codex.wordpress.org/Comment_Moderation

  42. Pat 1789 | January 29, 2012 at 3:32 pm |

    Anyone even considering writing a judge who is in the process of considering a ruling is, well, a complete imbecile. And that is putting it mildly.

  43. jonah —– allen west is just another coward in congress . he talks a big , bad game but he does not have the courage to bring obama’s constitutional eligibility to the floor as he said he would do before elected . and please don;t tell me nobody else has or he will do it later . that is no excuse for him not to stand up and do it and get things to moving . he is just another phony politician . i know he will scream about policies of obama but i’m not impressed , it is common place for anybody to do that . limbaugh and hannity and all their crowd also do that daily but , they will not bring up obama’s eligibility or take any phone calls on it . some of them scream socialist about obama but no mention that he is not eligible to be in the wh .

  44. CFR globalist Newt Gingrich is the ideal candidate for the ruling elite. He has served the elite faithfully and helped it trade away our national sovereignty. He worked with Bill Clinton to foist NAFTA on the American people and move millions of jobs into the China slave labor system of totalitarian globalism.

  45. Still trying my best to wake up some of you sheeple…..truth coming….get ready…..

    Here’s someone else with something to say…..

    The Rumor Mill News Reading Room

    Bill Wood Update: Be Ready to Have Your Minds Blown WIDE Open in the Next Interview!!

    Posted By: Jordon [Send E-Mail]
    Date: Sunday, 29-Jan-2012 14:04:21

    .

    Update from Kerry Cassidy

    January 29, 2012

    INTERVIEW ANNOUNCEMENT – 2ND INTERVIEW WITH BILL WOOD AKA BILL BROCKBRADER

    I will be doing another interview with Bill on Saturday February 4th at 5pm PST on Livestream

    Here is a communique from Bill Wood/Brockbrader that he has asked me to post in this regard:

    “Shortly after his last interview, Bill was forced into leaving for a secret location for his own safety. He is now being directly protected by White Hat sources at this secret location. He will be speaking about some of his experiences in his new life. Also, because Bill’s true identity was exposed by government agents, he will be revealing his conclusions into his investigations about the single largest criminal organization in Las Vegas and how an ex Navy SEAL and his wife’s ‘swinger’ parties are involved. He will be joined by a new mystery guest for his interview. You will hear a unique newly developed perspective based on Holodynamic principles that calls for the transformation of America and other military personal similar fears as a uniting factor that will be the foundation for change NOW in the face of the NDAA.

    Other key concepts highlight the similarities between Bill’s experience and Kay Griggs 1998 interview exposing how her husband Colonel Griggs similar use of sexual coercion, mind control, and extensive abuses of U.S. army personal that have led to inspiring support for Bill. Bill is now working actively to construct a plan that brings about the changes in the world that everyone has been long anticipating. Please join us as he will be revealing much, much more about how we all can work together to incorperate these changes throughout the planet. This interview will be the game changer for the changes coming at the end of 2012. He has asked me to include the following announcement:

    Thank you all for your emails and comments. I apologize for not responding but life has gotten pretty interesting here in ‘the land where freedom began’. I would like to ask a favor from all supporters for changing the world. There is some debate here. Realize that there are still some battle hardened veterans of light here that don’t seem to agree that the new army of light is standing up and asking to be counted on for support. So I am asking this as a unique means of showing just how many people are ready to work for some change in the world. I have included a donation button below.

    I would like to ask that everyone that is ready to see the world change, donate one dollar. You can donate more but that is all I need from any one person. The idea is to show just how many of us are out there so the boys that can put down some zeros on the checks will see that the support is here and the time to move is now. Realize this – one donation of $100,000 doesn’t help…as the universe responds to action, individual donations are the keys. I need to identify the number of supporters that are out there currently.

    Thanks all for the support in advance. Just be ready to have your minds blown WIDE open in the next interview.”

    Bill

    http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=228755

  46. During his stint in the House, Gingrich also supported GATT and the WTO, two big cornerstones of the one-world government agenda. “Gingrich’s Benedict Arnold act helped to hand over the power to regulate foreign commerce, a power reserved in the Constitution to Congress alone, to an internationally controlled body, making America’s economic interests entirely at the mercy of the WTO,” explains Rebecca Terrell, writing for Campaign for Liberty.

  47. Now that he is masquerading as a “conservative” in order to fool Americans next November, Gingrich has backed away from the climate change mantra he so enthusiastically supported before he was groomed once again for GOP nominee.
    In 2007, however, Mr. Speaker was talking out the other side. At that time, Gingrich praised Democrat John Kerry’s book about environmentalism and said global warming is real. He offered what amounted to an unexpected apology for his party’s inaction on curtailing greenhouse gas emissions, according to the Boston Globe. Gingrich, of course, is fully behind the plan to implement carbon taxes under the ruse of climate change, but will turn in an Oscar performance in order to trick the voting public. If elected, he will turn on a dime, pull an Obama, and go back on his disavowal of the climate change agenda.

  48. SueK | January 29, 2012 at 11:58 am | I was unaware of the MA ballot challenge by LTC Reade. Here is his complaint to SoS Bill Galvin. This is an excellent summary:

    http://obamaballotchallenge.com/taxachussets-ballot-challenge-by-retired-army-officer

    Will be watching this one in addition to all other ballot challenges. Unfortunately, I don’t think this one will have legs in Liberal moonbat MA.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Sue K
    I like this post under the article.

    Unabated Obama claims by fraudulent documents he is uniquely qualified to be our president but the U.S. Constitution denies him that right. Making him one anti American S.O.B., fathered by a previously married British subject, he undeniably admits in books, for once president he signed an Executive Order denying any release of his past history. Obama still claims transparency to this name when he is legally forbidden to use the tribal name of Obama as he usurps America, lie by lie in his Catch 22.
    Have you ever wondered, why would or how Mrs. Lolo Ann Soetoro born 11.29.1942, white mother of Barack H. Obama aka Barry Soetoro, never changed her name and her two children’s names (Maya and Barry) once born and schooled as citizens of Indonesia, to a divorced-penniless, polygamist and a bigamist’s name of a deceased b l a c k pedophile African called Barack H. Obama Sr. name, because she was insane?
    When no record or claim of it exists!
    When it is assumed she as a teenager unwittingly at 17-18 years of age fornicated, married and illegally used a bi-racial African Muslum multiple marriage tribal groups’ name from Kenya a British colony, and bear Obama born 08.04.1961, out of wedlock, but where was it?
    They legally making Obama‘s name and any use of it null and void and illegal to use by law in America, just ask any Mormon or divorce lawyer. But possibly legal in one of Obama’s later mis-stated imaginary 57 plus Muslum states of mind. Accepted as one of Obama’s many idiotic Harvard educated transparent statements made campaigning as president, like he claimed to be a Constitutional Professor, with no pedigree or history to verify or prove it, in his long list lies.
    If Barack. H. Obama can prove as some claim he was born in Kenya, where it is legal to have many wives; he can be legally called Barack Hussian Obama, a British-Kenyan subject. But Obama had to assume his mother’s maiden name of Dunham, embarrassed and in her honorific situation, Ms. Dunham not Mrs. Obama as recorded after their fast track divorce, Obama had to keep the surname of Dunham, until his adopted name of Barry Soetoro of Indonesia became legal. Now ask yourself this, when he used the name of Barry Soetoro in his Indonesian schooling and citizenship and gain a free Fulbright Scholarship to U. S. Occidental College, where he flunked out. Was he lying and fooling who, The Wee People or the liberal demonic academic Lemming community?
    Unless Obama was adopted later in life and has a second verified (unaltered) copy of an Indonesian official Adoption Record by a deceased Kenyan, he remains Barry Soetoro of Indonesia. Whereby canceling his first U.S. and Indonesian adoption, a switcheroo from Barry Soetoro to a deceased Barack H. Obama, sr. surname; which is ridiculous, even to say or offer up for his U. S. repatriation, which is an unbelievable scenario; only id io ts’ and demonic-rats would believe and swallow what Obama throws up. Because, no U.S. State Department record or document exists that he is Barack H. Obama, from his U.S. and Indonesian legal adoption by Lolo Soetoro, he, Obama remains Barry Soetoro citizen of Indonesia, period, end of story to the fictionalized fractured fairy tale of Obama.

    poetopoet, 2 weeks ago

  49. You cannot read into the law what is not there, and be taken seriously.

    Here is a link to the syllabus of Minor, from Cornell Law School.
    http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0088_0162_ZS.html
    Here is a link to the actual case.
    http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0088_0162_ZO.html
    The Minor case had to decide under the new 14th Amendment whether women were citizens and then, whether voting was a privilege and immunity. Once the court ruled Minor was a citizen, the court expressly said, it didn’t need to consider what kind of citizen she was; the case here was about equal protection provided to all U.S. citizens.

    The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their [p168] parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens.>/b> The words “all children” are certainly as comprehensive, when used in this connection, as “all persons,” and if females are included in the last they must be in the first. That they are included in the last is not denied. In fact the whole argument of the plaintiffs proceeds upon that idea.

  50. Moderation at 5:12.

    (And the bold should have ended after the word “citizen.”)

  51. Isn’t Disney World just a people trap operated by a mouse?

  52. “..truth coming….get ready…..”
    Any references to Rumor Mill News I take with a grain of salt. “Rumor” aptly describes the content, and there are too many really reliable sources on the internet than to take valuable time reading stuff that is not dependably sourced.

  53. Another summation of hearing….a portion:

    http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/ (they also reference CW’s excellent work in a later thread)

    Many people who are unfamiliar with the Legal System do not know that the hearing or trial level is known as the “trier of the facts”. Only matters of Law can be appealed, not the facts that are developed, presented or testified to in any hearing or trial. Only when there is overwhelming evidence of malfeasance, gross perjury or the denial of the admissibility of probative evidence is a new trial or hearing ordered when a mistake of law has been found on appeal. As a practical matter appellate courts rarely order such remedy, when ordered it is believed that the defendant did not have his constitutional right to face his accusers at the trier of the facts level!
    Since Obama and his attorney chose not to be present a defense and dispute the evidence that was presented, this can be taken as an admission that all of the evidence admitted were indeed facts and may not be disputed at a later time on appeal! The irony of this course is that Obama is declaring that the court has no Jurisdiction in this matter and will appeal as a matter of law though these damning facts may very well stand! It also gives the impression that he considers himself above the law — Georgia’s. We have a plethora of data points on the sequestering of all of Obama’s records and bona fides which he has spent millions of dollars to keep out the public’s hands for the last four years. After this hearing we may eventually know why.

  54. NBC_Vic_Hern | January 29, 2012 at 5:11 pm |

    I didn’t see that comment, Vic-it’s a goodie! Thank you for the heads-up.

    Still more questions and not enough answers.


  55. Rumor is, ALJ Malihi asked whether Petitioners wanted him to enter such Default; but, reportedly, they said, ‘No.’

    Supposedly, although they have entered this same ‘evidence’ into dozens of other records, they did not want to waste this opportunity to submit testimonial evidence into this record, providing ALJ Malihi with a first-hand opportunity to gauge the credibility of their witnesses, under some mistaken belief, submitting this evidence into the record of this administrative hearing without objection from Respondent, automatically validated their submissions. Then, if they won, they could file yet another suit in a real judicial court based on ‘evidence’ certified by the OSAH (but which was outside of the scope of that forum’s expertise or authority) President Obama is Constitutionally ineligible for the job.

    616-1-2-.22 Hearing Procedure. Amended.
    (1) The Administrative Law Judge shall conduct a fair and impartial hearing, take action to
    avoid unnecessary delay in the disposition of the proceedings, and maintain order. The
    Administrative Law Judge may, among other things:


    (3) Whenever any party raises issues under either the Georgia or United States Constitution,
    the sections of any laws or rules constitutionally challenged and any constitutional provisions
    such laws or rules are alleged to violate must be stated with specificity. In addition, an allegation of unconstitutionality must be supported by a statement either of the basis for the claim of unconstitutionality as a matter of law or of the facts under which the party alleges that the law or
    rule is unconstitutional as applied to the party. Although the Administrative Law Judge is not authorized to resolve constitutional challenges to statutes or rules, the Administrative Law Judge
    may, in the Administrative Law Judge’s discretion, take evidence and make findings of fact relating to such challenges.

    Or, if they lost; they could use this record as the basis for an appeal filed in a subsequent judicial proceedings.

    616-1-2-.39 Judicial Review. Amended.
    Pursuant to the APA, a copy of any petition for judicial review of a Final Decision shall be filed with the Office of State Administrative Hearings by the party seeking judicial review simultaneously with the service of the petition upon the Referring Agency. The Referring Agency shall submit the hearing record as compiled and certified by the Clerk to the reviewing court.

    Of course, they would be very very wrong.

    Assume the ALJ allowed all of Petitioners’ materials into the record AND, believing their witnesses genuinely believed everything they said AND reviewing the record, took all evidence as true, and issued findings of fact based on this record. And assume Petitioners subsequently used this administrative record in a real judicial proceeding. Any judge would toss this tripe based on a finding, by crediting this ‘evidence’ the previous tribunal had acted in a manner that was both “capricious and arbitrary” and “contrary to law.”

    In other words, decisions from a prior tribunal are regularly overturned when they contain errors in fact or law. Decisions based on sound facts and law are not overturned, even if the appellate body would have reached a different conclusion.

    Here, as the law I cited clearly explains, the law court does not accept any interpretation from an administrative hearing on Constitutional interpretation.
    http://jbjd.org/2012/01/28/was-good-time-best-time-party/

  56. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    In reference to the “Taxachussets Ballot Challenge by Retired Army Officer”

    http://obamaballotchallenge.com/taxachussets-ballot-challenge-by-retired-army-officer

    I find this comment too important not to REPEAT -

    “Unabated Obama claims by fraudulent documents he is uniquely qualified to be our president but the U.S. Constitution denies him that right. Making him one anti American S.O.B., fathered by a previously married British subject, he undeniably admits in books, for once president he signed an Executive Order denying any release of his past history. Obama still claims transparency to this name when he is legally forbidden to use the tribal name of Obama as he usurps America, lie by lie in his Catch 22.
    Have you ever wondered, why would or how Mrs. Lolo Ann Soetoro born 11.29.1942, white mother of Barack H. Obama aka Barry Soetoro, never changed her name and her two children’s names (Maya and Barry) once born and schooled as citizens of Indonesia, to a divorced-penniless, polygamist and a bigamist’s name of a deceased b l a c k pedophile African called Barack H. Obama Sr. name, because she was insane?
    When no record or claim of it exists!
    When it is assumed she as a teenager unwittingly at 17-18 years of age fornicated, married and illegally used a bi-racial African Muslum multiple marriage tribal groups’ name from Kenya a British colony, and bear Obama born 08.04.1961, out of wedlock, but where was it?
    They legally making Obama‘s name and any use of it null and void and illegal to use by law in America, just ask any Mormon or divorce lawyer. But possibly legal in one of Obama’s later mis-stated imaginary 57 plus Muslum states of mind. Accepted as one of Obama’s many idiotic Harvard educated transparent statements made campaigning as president, like he claimed to be a Constitutional Professor, with no pedigree or history to verify or prove it, in his long list lies.
    If Barack. H. Obama can prove as some claim he was born in Kenya, where it is legal to have many wives; he can be legally called Barack Hussian Obama, a British-Kenyan subject. But Obama had to assume his mother’s maiden name of Dunham, embarrassed and in her honorific situation, Ms. Dunham not Mrs. Obama as recorded after their fast track divorce, Obama had to keep the surname of Dunham, until his adopted name of Barry Soetoro of Indonesia became legal. Now ask yourself this, when he used the name of Barry Soetoro in his Indonesian schooling and citizenship and gain a free Fulbright Scholarship to U. S. Occidental College, where he flunked out. Was he lying and fooling who, The Wee People or the liberal demonic academic Lemming community?
    Unless Obama was adopted later in life and has a second verified (unaltered) copy of an Indonesian official Adoption Record by a deceased Kenyan, he remains Barry Soetoro of Indonesia. Whereby canceling his first U.S. and Indonesian adoption, a switcheroo from Barry Soetoro to a deceased Barack H. Obama, sr. surname; which is ridiculous, even to say or offer up for his U. S. repatriation, which is an unbelievable scenario; only id io ts’ and demonic-rats would believe and swallow what Obama throws up. Because, no U.S. State Department record or document exists that he is Barack H. Obama, from his U.S. and Indonesian legal adoption by Lolo Soetoro, he, Obama remains Barry Soetoro citizen of Indonesia, period, end of story to the fictionalized fractured fairy tale of Obama.”

    Thank you “poetopoet”

    PS – This must be the first Blue State to start such an action. Remember it’s the Electoral College and not the “mob”!!

  57. Gordon Duff starts down the Exposing the real Osama Road – Veterans Today

    A must read for ALL NAVY SEALS who think Seal Team 6 took him out… get ready for true history lesson 1:

    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/01/26/tidbits-what-is-being-held-back-from-you/

  58. From one who has inside knowledge of the dark cabal……The CRAPOLLA is ABOUT TO HIT THE FAN FOLKS…..

    Poofness – 1-29-12 – MOPPING UP

    Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 2:01 PM
    To: 2goforth@Safe-mail.net
    Subject: Mopping Up

    Superstition – Stevie Wonder

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37-yFGJngPs&feature=related

    Very superstitious, writing’s on the wall.
    Very superstitious, ladder’s ’bout to fall.
    Thirteen-month-old baby broke the looking glass.
    Seven years of bad luck, the good things in your past.
    When you believe in things that you don’t understand, then you suffer.
    Superstition ain’t the way.
    Hey, hey, hey.

    Ooh, very superstitious, wash your face and hands.
    Rid me of the problem, do all that you can.
    Keep me in a daydream, keep me goin’ strong.
    You don’t wanna save me, sad is my song.
    When you believe in things that you don’t understand, then you suffer.
    Superstition ain’t the way.
    Hey, hey, hey.

    Very superstitious, nothing more to say.
    Very superstitious, the devil’s on his way.
    Thirteen-month-old baby broke the looking glass.
    Seven years of bad luck, the good things in your past.
    When you believe in things that you don’t understand, then you suffer.
    Superstition ain’t the way.
    Hey, hey, hey.
    Very superstitious.

    Greetings and Salutations;

    Well what began last sunday, finally got out. Yes, massive arrests happened, mostly in europe of bankers who wanted to call the dragon’s bluff, then the begging for forgiveness began. Never call a dragon’s bluff. Last week’s news letter gave everyone a head’s up about what time it is, some just chose not to believe it and paid the cost.

    http://the2012scenario.com/2012/01/taibbi-good-foreclosure-deal-could-open-the-door-to-ending-up-with-half-of-wall-street-in-jail/?utm_source=rss

    The political arrests soon come. Only THAT will finally get the american people’s attention. No one is getting away with anything, what and start this crap all over again? When change comes old beliefs go to the wayside, truth replaces it and some you may be uncomfortable with. Who says there’s no cure for cancer, only they who have a vested interested in keeping the money game running, as there is more money in ‘treating’ than curing. The folks in the rafters have been watching all along and accepted the council, to activate at this time, what they were told to put in place now. There is no power on earth that CAN stop what’s coming down right now. And it’s not like the bad guys didn’t know their day of justice was coming. They thought they could use their technology to avoid it. When the bush admin was in place, they found out the chinese were in places, more advanced than they thought. Stealth subs, taking down with a missile a satellite they had sent up instead of trying to match the us with conventional weapons, they took lasers to another level.

    Some folks wrote me and let me know, they were ‘feeling’ the shift going on. The tingles were hitting them, mental growth, as their lids were being blown off. This is what the bad guys were trying to prevent and they’ve used everything to do it….low frequency resonance, drugs to dumb people down, a constant bombardment of fear from the media, all used to prevent what they themselves knew was coming. Everything runs in cycles and tech will not stop that, yet they tried. There’s no such thing as the ‘liberal media’, they all work for the same group, playing out the polarization thru your earholes. Truth itself is neutral and your reaction to it is where the polarization happens. Your opinion is what they work on. Guiding it as they see fit. Now what if you are presented with a new truth, that explains everything you’ve held onto as ‘facts’, could you handle it? There are some basics that do not change and one needs to go into the zone of acceptance, as the ‘rules’ are changing to fit the real facts. The natives americans said that in the ‘end times’ the white man would come to them to find out what they may have missed.

    http://wakingtimes.com/2012/01/20/the-ten-commandments-of-the-native-american-indians-video/

    The door to the future has opened and the pressure has shifted, you’re about to see and feel the new as opposed to the past. Only you can determine, how you handle that. As the master said, ‘hold all things in common’, the words ‘good and bad’ will lose their meaning, things are just what they are. Then you will realize, that philosophies were created by man to control things around them. Perhaps the star trek orders make more sense now, ‘do not interfere with un advanced worlds’. Here’s an encapsulation;

    Check this out: this will give a clue as to how long and what things were assembled to put this together,

    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/01/28/heres-the-deal-fixing-america/

    This man is now safe. I feel sorry for the folks who did what they did to him. Dragons don’t forget. Things along this line have been going a lot longer than this tho. This is just the culmination of it all. The legalities have been handled, done, and 2+ yrs ago the world ct issued orders for the us military to keep the peace in this county after the announcements are given, expecting the less than nice folks to try to get the populace stirred up, for cover…false flags, etc. To the dragons these guys are naked, they have no secrets. So the mop up operation continues in the us, no way were they going to release funds to the people with the cockroaches still loose, to steal what folks have waited so long for. Release to the masses is all that’s left. Please have a wonderful life, fun filled, and keep your mouth shut about your blessings.

    Love and Kisses,

    Poofness

  59. More awakening for those NOT in denial….

    Taibbi: Good Foreclosure Deal Could Open the Door to Ending Up With Half of Wall Street in Jail
    2012 January 29
    Posted by Pat Donworth
    Taibbi: Good Foreclosure Deal Could Open the Door to Ending Up With Half of Wall Street in Jail

    Sarah Seltzer, Alternet, 01-28-2012, http://bit.ly/ycBFLe

    Last night on Countdown, Rolling Stone reporter Matt Taibbi talked about the recent foreclosure settlement deal being negotiated between the state Attorney Generals, including California’s bold Kamala D. Harris, and the banks.

    “If they do this for real, if they do this like an Enron-style investigation, you could have half the luminaries on Wall Street doing prison time…. they all made enormous profits from selling mismarked and over-evaluated mortgages to unsuspecting investors,” Taibbi said.

    The question in terms of broader national policy, says Taibbi, is whether the Obama Administration has really gotten the Occupy Wall Street message, or “will it be a cosmetic investigation” only?

    Continues here…..

    http://the2012scenario.com/2012/01/taibbi-good-foreclosure-deal-could-open-the-door-to-ending-up-with-half-of-wall-street-in-jail/?utm_source=rss

  60. jbjd,

    It doesn’t appear that the GA ballot challenge would have to go to a law court. We have some real negative attitude, justifiably, by both the current judge involved and he to whom this judge’s suggestions will go for decision. This is of course due to the arrogant dissing of their persons and positions within the State. It would appear then that any “appeal” involving “tripe” would have to come from he who would have to convince any future court with some type of excuse for not previously being involved and took no part in as well as having to present some kind of discovery in rebuttle which he has already paid dearly in filthy lucre to prevent doing for all this time. I don’t think that (involvement of actual breathing and bleeding human beings with egos) scenario quite matches your removed and objective outline from the ivory tower lecturers!

  61. Finger-Wag Flashback: NBC’s Brian Williams Goes ‘Jan Brewer’ On President Bush

    http://www.breitbart.tv/finger-wag-flashback-nbcs-brian-williams-goes-jan-brewer-on-president-bush/

    NBC anchor Brian Williams had an interview with President Bush in 2007 to discuss his “eclectic” reading habits. The conversation changed to leadership and his decisions being constantly analyzed by pundits and commentators. During the exchange Brian Williams pointed his finger at President Bush’s chest asking, “even if you’re frustrated that we’re getting something wrong?” in response to President Bush saying that a leader cannot allow the constant exposer to cause him to lose focus on fulfilling his job as a decision maker.

    Much has been made about the recent photo of AZ Governor Jan Brewer pointing her finger at President Obama. Many in the media have considered it racist, disrespectful and “unprecedented.” It will be interesting to see if those same media commentators will have the same reaction to this gesture made by Brian Williams.

  62. >>>>JBJD,
    The Minor case had to decide under the new 14th Amendment whether women were citizens and then, whether voting was a privilege and immunity. Once the court ruled Minor was a citizen, the court expressly said, it didn’t need to consider what kind of citizen she was; the case here was about equal protection provided to all U.S. citizens.<<<<

    Wrong!!! The Majority opinion given wasn't about crazy off topic ramblings. They could have just said she was a citizen and got the constitutional rights thereof. They spent time, and words, configuring the opinion. They used the language to express the terms "Naturalized"–as in 14th Amendment and "Natural Born"–as it is mentioned within the Constitution(Which is under requirements for POTUS only to my knowledge). They spent time defining what each was, and the meaning under the 14th Amendment. These were NOT RAMBLINGS, but definitions to provide clarity in the future. The basically acknowledged that the 14th Amendment "Naturalized" individuals and provided the same Constitutional rights as Natural Born citizens regardless of sex, save one example which they discussed. The unique example was offices of Vice President and President–which require Natural Born Citizenship as mentioned within the Constitution.

    I will not accept that majority SCOTUS opinion in Minor vs Happenstaff, as you claim was an accident in regards to defining Natural Born Citizenship. Every word was intended to be there for a purpose, every definition was important. The opinion of citizenship could have been answered in a single paragraph, as you did above. The impetus for the multi-paragraph SCOTUS majority decision, with historical notations, was to enlighten those upon the meaning of citizenship following the 14th Amendment, it's distinct difference from Natural Born Citizenship, and the Constitutional implications of citizenship. In the eyes of the SCOTUS, the only difference was the ability to hold office of POTUS or VPOTUS.

    Don't accuse others of 'reading into' the law, when the SCOTUS spent the time to explain the law and it's implications. The majority opinion was crafted for a purpose, not just to say a particular individual was a citizen.

    JBJD, you have a right to your opinion (at least until Holder and Obama destroyed rule of law and mocked the Constitution). If believing that "Natural Born Citizen" is a term used by John Jay and George Washington after reading Vattel's "Laws of Nations" equates to Two Citizen Parents and born on Native Soil makes me a Constitution follower and thus a "BIRTHER", then I am proud to accept the term. I have a term for those whom believe the Constitution needs to be 'changed' and/or ignored—–I call them TREASONOUS ENEMIES. I agree that it doesn't have quite the ring of BIRTHER.

    Pete

  63. Pete, well done. Obfuscators have little support at this blog. Thanks, Bill G

  64. jbjd
    you are so full of it
    It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens
    ..it says CITIZENS , not NATURAL BORN citizens. Learn how to read. The INS federal code establishes TWO classes of citizen: naturalized and natural born. You keep confusing natural, naturalized, and natural born citizen. Learn how to freaking read for God’s sake.

  65. Ah, the canard of ‘we all have a right to an opinion’; unless, of course, that opinion isn’t yours. And this exchange makes my point.

    As long as no legally binding definition exists of NBC; then everyone who has an opinion gets to say what it is and what it is not. And that’s why we need a legally binding definition. I proposed a mechanism to obtain a legally binding definition, through ballot laws that define NBC insofar as they define, which candidates may have their names printed on the ballot. That was years ago, after I first proposed ballot challenges.

    Yep; keep up the nasty remarks. But always remember, even though Petitioners raised as the basis for the GA ballot challenge, the argument I advised will not work, that is, President Obama is not a NBC; this administrative hearing you are so hyped about, was my idea MORE THAN THREE YEARS AGO, .If I am as ignorant of our legal and political system as your inane comments would indicate then, I would ask: what took you so long to find the appropriate forum for redress? And why have you been so willing to support charlatans who have wasted so much money from well-meaning albeit misguided citizens on getting there, when you and your fellow citizens could have mounted these challenges for all of these years, for free?

    Or, are you being paid to keep people ignorant AND waste their money and time?

  66. Air Force Brat

    Have you, or have you not, EVER litigated a case?

  67. What gives with ORYR? Quiet for the last two days. Lame Cherry is gone. Post & Email is down. Thankfully CW is still running…

  68. jbjd:
    But always remember, even though Petitioners raised as the basis for the GA ballot challenge, the argument I advised will not work, that is, President Obama is not a NBC; this administrative hearing you are so hyped about, was my idea MORE THAN THREE YEARS AGO,
    ========================
    What would be your basis for ballot challenge? What evidence for your proposed error by the SoSs or anyone else in charge of certification would you be able to present to discredit them? If they had no such evidence (much of which has been more recently discovered AFTER assumptions and suspicions were investigated) at the time themselves and as you say the accepted definition for NBC is still to be decided for all time, then they would simply say they had nothing to treat this particular candidate any differently from any other where nothing solid had been brought to their attention.

    So, while you seem to have missed that portion of the hearing that included the more threatening and dramatic offerings of current fraud, the only expected follow-up to the present case of alleged non-citizenship of any kind, there is another approach included that was not in need of a final definition of that one type of special citizenship. And we pray that the judge’s suggestions will be to look further into those accusations brought by the experienced investigators which just may cause an outcome by the lowly branch which could not be accomplished by the law courts due to fear of losing place due to ridicule.

  69. Rob | January 29, 2012 at 10:29 pm | Obama attorney knows eligibility hearing was disaster for the president

    http://www.coachisright.com/obama-attorney-knows-eligibility-hearing-was-disaster-for-the-president/

    ===========================
    Excellent summary of how the mighty may be held by their big toes by the little ones they walk over and dismiss so easily.

  70. After the 2008 election, I was part of a committee involving all 50 states; I’m a resident of Kentucky….
    Our jobs were to use certified mail to inform all our state electors the fraud was ineligible.
    It was humiliating the way we were treated; like they had been threatened by the ‘powers’ to ignore us.
    I did contact my SOS and received an email from his secretary; his duties were only ‘ministerial’.
    Ministerial: an act done after ascertaining the existence of facts in obedience to a legal order without personal judgment or discretion.
    Now, folks, ain’t that a sad sack of taters!!!

    (moderation???My new name wasn’t recognized??)

  71. A Crazy Old Coot

    Pete,
    “Constitution follower and thus a “BIRTHER”, then I am proud to accept the term.”

    Amen Brother!!

  72. What part of ineligible does Tina not understand??
    Alabama and Georgia have blocked the fraud from being on the ballot; New Hampshire has demanded the long form BC, not the fake from the WH website.
    The following are working on blocking or challenging the fraud on 2012–Mass, Ill, California, Florida, Indiana, Arizona, Montana, Penn, Texas, Missoouri, Oklahoma. Many of these shouldn’t surprise us.

  73. was my idea MORE THAN THREE YEARS AGO, .If I am……

    WRONG. I was one the one who initiated email with you and told you about it. You are definitely NOT a constitutional expert in the matter. You have a short memory, as well as lack of understanding on how to read the INS codes, historical precedence in recorded law, references to law. I point you to Leo Donofrios site where you can become further educated on matter of natural born citizen, minor case precedence, and other historical facts that completely decimate your posts on this blog.

  74. was my idea MORE THAN THREE YEARS AGO, .sorry ….dude. WRONG. It was my idea, I was the one who posted it first and sent out emails. Also, your positions on NBC are completely contradictory.

  75. Pete
    Right on. Also, INS FEDERAL position on citizenship presents both naturalized (a) and natural born citizen (b). And they say (a) is not the same as (b). This in of itself allows the natural born citizen clause in constitution to stand. See Leo’s latest connect the dots post. It blows jd’s logic out of the water. I posted the same thing, but CW has me moderated for some reason.

  76. Pete
    Right on. Also, INS position on citizenship presents both naturalized A and natural born citizen B. And they say A is not the same as B. This in of itself allows the natural born citizen clause in constitution to stand. See Leo’s latest connect the dots post. It blows jd’s logic out of the water. I posted the same thing, but CW has me moderated for some reason.

  77. By now it should be obvious to anyone who is watching the unfolding scene that the elitists in the Republican establishment and the criminals of the Obama machine have decided that Romney is to be the Republican candidate. Hence,in their minds anyone threatening their chosen one must be politically destroyed. Similar maneuvers occurred in the 1964 Goldwater era.

    Right now that imminent threat is Gingrich. If Santorum or Paul were anywhere close, they, too, would receive the venomous attacks of the smear machines. The way I see it, we have both forces – elitist Repubs and the Obama-ites coming together for their own individual, nefarious purposes. The MSM is complicit, of course.

    I believe from what has been reported about the Obama machine that they want Romney to go up against Obama in the general election, because the Chicago-way people already have their line of attack prepared for Romney.

    Sarah Palin’s advice to Floridians is spot on, imho. Let this warfare continue on beyond FL, so that We the People in the rest of the country have a chance to let our voices be heard. Vote Gingrich, she says. No, he is not perfect, but he is the closest to stopping Romney, the chosen shoo-in.

  78. JBJD, the Howard Zinn admirer, is showing her true colors her as an Obama protector. She is a Lefty feminazi posing as a “constitutionalist”— obviously. CW should not allow her to polute this site.

  79. Truth coming to LIGHT……

    US Consulate whistleblower: 9/11 hijackers passports were issued by the CIA

    Friday, January 13, 2012
    US Consulate whistleblower: 9/11 hijackers passports were issued by the CIA

    Mike Springman- The former head of the American visa bureau in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia blows the whistle on the 9/11 hijackers.

    Springman went public (after internal efforts failed) to expose the State Dept/CIA conduiting terrorists into the US

    Continues here……

    http://mybigfatanti-zionistlife.blogspot.com/2012/01/us-consulate-whistleblower-911.html

  80. Soros: Obama, Romney ‘Not Much Difference’

    Soros offered the reassuring news to liberals across Europe during an interview this week in Davos, Switzerland.

    As policymakers from Hong Kong to Canada pressed Greece and its creditors to strike a deal to cut the nation’s debt, Soros pressed in on GOP presidential candidate Romney:

    “Well, look, either you’ll have an extremist conservative, be it Gingrich or Santorum, in which case I think it will make a big difference which of the two comes in,” Soros told Reuters in a videotaped interview.

    “If it’s between Obama and Romney, there isn’t all that much difference except for the crowd that they bring with them.”

    Read more on Newsmax.com: Soros: Obama, Romney ‘Not Much Difference’
    http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/SorosObama-RomneyNotMuchDifference/2012/01/28/id/425830?s=al&promo_code=E100-1

  81. Here’s the reality of things……Dr. Paul is NOT dropping out…..others will be dropping out but…..

    Ron Paul: In it to win it

    WASHINGTON, January 29, 2012—During this primary season, many political pundits have assumed that Ron Paul is not actively trying to win the Presidency. To them, he is simply a message candidate who has some interesting ideas but no path to the nomination. Dr. Paul is seen as too much of a fringe candidate by the mainstream media and therefore considered unelectable. The facts, however, say otherwise. This time around, the Ron Paul campaign is more organized, has better advisors, and is actually campaigning to win.

    Along with establishment candidate Mitt Romney, Ron Paul is the only candidate who was able to get on the ballot in all fifty states. Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum will not get enough delegates from the states they have qualified for to receive the Republican nomination. Rick Santorum still has very poor name recognition, and Newt Gingrich is one of the most polarizing political figures of our generation , and he could not even get on the ballot in his home state. In other words, Mitt Romney and Ron Paul are the only electable candidates to choose from.

    One of the biggest reasons to believe that Congressman Paul intends to win is his age. Running a national campaign is the most stressful, physically draining, and emotionally taxing activity that a politician can undertake, and 76 year old Ron Paul would not be doing it unless he thought there were a chance he could win. With all the work that the Paul campaign put into Iowa and New Hampshire, it would be foolish to think that there wasn’t any campaign strategy to pick up delegates.

    The clearest indicator to Dr. Paul’s supporters that his intent is to win is the number of attack adds that the campaign has run against his opponents. Until very recently, Paul has been extremely hesitant to attack his opponents. What he enjoys most is presenting his ideas in a clear precise fashion. During this election cycle, he has been much more willing to attack his opponents about their records, and also willing to brag about his own credentials, a topic that he was very humble about back in 2008.

    Some say that Congressman Paul is only trying to deliver his message to the country on a national platform and actually has no interest in being elected. There might have been a case for that argument four years ago, but not today. Paul’s campaign strategy is not just to stay in the race until the very end, but to accumulate delegates. If Paul were simply trying to deliver a message, he would not have skipped campaigning in Florida in order to campaign in states like Minnesota, Nevada and Maine. He knows that he will not be competitive in the sunshine state. Because the delegates are winner-take-all, there is no point in wasting money, time, and resources in Florida.

    There has been a general consensus in the media that Paul has a “ceiling” of support and cannot get past a certain point. The argument goes that because he knows this, he cannot possibly be trying to win a national election. Once again, this argument might have been true in 2008, but not today. Anyone who has paid attention to the election over the past eight months would see that the ceiling for Ron Paul has gotten higher over time. When he first announced that he was forming an exploratory campaign, pundits said that he would get his 5% of the vote and then drop out. Soon it was 10%, but that was all he would ever get. Within months, the “ceiling” was at 20% and Ron Paul had a shot at winning the Iowa Caucus. At that point Chris Wallace made the comment that Iowa would no longer matter if Ron Paul pulled out a victory there. Ron Paul and his campaign have realized that the “ceiling” that the media talks about does not exist and has simply been created to discourage potential supporters.

    There is no question that Dr. Paul’s path to the nomination will be uphill, but the uninspiring Mitt Romney, the unstable Newt Gingrich, and the obscure Rick Santorum make anything possible. He will have many bumps in the road, but he is the only candidate in the race who will cut anything from the budget, who has been consistent, and who is a true conservative. Santorum, Gingrich, and Romney should take notice: Ron Paul isn’t going anywhere.

    http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/political-pro-con/2012/jan/29/ron-paul-it-win-it/

  82. http://politicalvelcraft.org/ron-paul/ Ron Paul
    Leader Of The 2012 Presidential Candidates Ron Paul: Most Consistent Unrelenting Champion of Liberty.

    He has never voted to raise taxes.
    He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
    He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
    He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
    He has never taken a government-paid junket.
    He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.

    He voted against the Patriot Act.
    He voted against regulating the Internet.
    He voted against the Iraq war.

    He does not participate in the lucrative congressional pension program.
    He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to the U.S. treasury every year.

    Congressman Paul introduces numerous pieces of substantive legislation each year, probably more than any single member of Congress.

    Ron Paul: Government is too big. The role of government ought to be for the protection of liberty, not for the intrusion in economic affairs. We’ve spent too much, we taxed too much, we borrowed too much. It’s bankrupting this country! I’ve been talking about these problems for a long, long time. Now we’re bankrupt and we have to decide which way we’re going to go.

    Ron Paul Campaign Responds to Rick Perry Attack Jesse Benton Ron Paul’s campaign continues to challenge Rick Perry in the lead up to…
    Poll: Ron Paul tops Rick Perry as presidential frontrunner in Texas It’s a good thing Rick Perry says he’s not running for president: Only 4 percent…
    Full GOP Debate at the Reagan Library – Politico/NBCSeptember 7, 2011, 8:00pm ET – Simi Valley, CA NBC / Politico Debate, Ronald Reagan…

    Ron Paul’s Bold Plan to Restore America, Save $1 Trillion & Balance the Budget 6058 view(s) per day
    Poll: Who Won the CNN & Western Republican Leadership Conference Debate? 3552 view(s) per day
    Watch the Full CNN & Western Republican Leadership Conference Debate with Ron Paul 2593 view(s) per day
    Black THIS Out 1903 view(s) per day
    “Black THIS Out!” Ron Paul Money Bomb – End the Media Blackout! 1475 view(s) per day
    Ron Paul 2012 Polls 1012 view(s) per day
    Ron Paul: Government Is NOT a Business 1000 view(s) per day
    Ron Paul Attacks Radical Money Printers and War Propagandists954 view(s) per day
    Ron Paul Highlights – CNN & Western Republican Leadership Conference Debate 888 view(s) per day
    Abortion 747 view(s) per day

    Honest Money 6812 comment(s)
    Abortion 4100 comment(s)
    Ron Paul to TSA: Stop Irradiating Our Bodies and Fondling Our Children! 3309 comment(s)
    New Ron Paul TV Ad – “The One Who Can Beat Obama” 3298 comment(s)
    Ron Paul: Conviction, Not Compromise! 2219 comment(s)
    Ron Paul 2012 2123 comment(s)
    Global Warming 2041 comment(s)
    Illegal Immigration 1857 comment(s)
    Audit the Federal Reserve 1778 comment(s)
    Health Care 1741 comment(s)

    Ron Paul
    Breaking: Department Of Defense Report ~ Validates Ron Paul’s Foreign Policy.
    Congressman Ron Paul is the leading advocate for freedom in our nation’s capital. As a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, Dr. Paul tirelessly works for limited constitutional government, low taxes, free markets, and a return to sound monetary policies. He is known among his congressional colleagues and his constituents for his consistent voting record. Dr. Paul never votes for legislation unless the proposed measure is expressly authorized by the Constitution. In the words of former Treasury Secretary William Simon, Dr. Paul is the “one exception to the Gang of 535” on Capitol Hill.Ron Paul was born and raised in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He graduated from Gettysburg College and the Duke University School of Medicine, before proudly serving as a flight surgeon in the U.S. Air Force during the 1960s. He and his wife Carol moved to Texas in 1968, where he began his medical practice in Brazoria County. As a specialist in obstetrics/gynecology, Dr. Paul has delivered more than 4,000 babies. He and Carol, who reside in Lake Jackson, Texas, are the proud parents of five children and have 17 grandchildren.While serving in Congress during the late 1970s and early 1980s, Dr. Paul’s limited-government ideals were not popular in Washington. In 1976, he was one of only four Republican congressmen to endorse Ronald Reagan for president.During that time, Congressman Paul served on the House Banking committee, where he was a strong advocate for sound monetary policy and an outspoken critic of the Federal Reserve’s inflationary measures. He was an unwavering advocate of pro-life and pro-family values. Dr. Paul consistently voted to lower or abolish federal taxes, spending and regulation, and used his House seat to actively promote the return of government to its proper constitutional levels. In 1984, he voluntarily relinquished his House seat and returned to his medical practice.Dr. Paul returned to Congress in 1997 to represent the 14th congressional district of Texas. He presently serves on the House Committee on Financial Services and the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. He continues to advocate a dramatic reduction in the size of the federal government and a return to constitutional principles.Congressman Paul’s consistent voting record prompted one of his congressional colleagues to say, “Ron Paul personifies the Founding Fathers’ ideal of the citizen-statesman. He makes it clear that his principles will never be compromised, and they never are.” Another colleague observed, “There are few people in public life who, through thick and thin, rain or shine, stick to their principles. Ron Paul is one of those few.”
    Congressman Ron Paul

    ANALYSIS | Republican Representative Ron Paul, R-Texas, is far more libertarian in his economic views than most of his opponents. His views on fiscal responsibility have been well-documented during his many years in the U.S. House of Representatives.

    Here is a look at Ron Paul’s economic policies.

    On Taxes: Drastic Cutting Is Key

    Paul has said he wouldn’t raise the debt ceiling, would veto unbalanced budgets, and opposesunfunded mandates and regulations on small businesses. He’s against income, capital gains, and “death taxes,” pledging to eliminate them all. He’s also for eliminating the Internal Revenue Service(IRS).

    He feels a flat tax or fair tax would be better than the current income tax system, but still thinks the 16th Amendment, which allows Congress to impose an income tax, needs to be repealed.

    On ‘Class Warfare’: In Favor of a Little Against ‘The Ones Who Rip Us Off’

    Paul doesn’t agree with his more vocal opponents, Herman Cain and Mitt Romney, in saying that demonstrations are a form of class warfare: “I do agree that there’s a mal-distribution in wealth in this country.”

    “Entitlements end up going to the rich anyway,” he told reporters at an event sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor. “Some of them should be attacked. The ones who rip us off, the ones who get bailed out.”

    On Economic Recovery: Blame Spending

    According to Paul’s campaign site, he believes that “excessive spending, artificial credit, and market manipulation crashed our economy, and no one should be surprised that these same policies continue to prolong the suffering for millions of Americans.”

    He thinks we’re sending jobs overseas due to a program of “deliberately weakening our currency.”

    On the Federal Reserve: End It

    This is a topic Paul enjoys discussing. He’d like to see the Federal Reserve abolished. One of his books is titled ”End the Fed.”

    During a June 13 debate in Manchester, N.H., he explained that the financial crisis could be linked to the fed.

    “We got in the trouble because we had a financial bubble, and it’s caused by the Federal Reserve,” he said. “If you don’t look at monetary policy, we will continue the trend of the last decade. We haven’t even – we haven’t developed any new jobs in the last decade. Matter of fact, we’ve had 30 million new people and no new jobs, and it’s because they don’t – the people don’t understand monetary policy and central economic planning things.”

    He sponsored H.R. 459, the Federal Reserve Transparency Act of 2011, which directs the Comptroller General to audit the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the federal reserve banks, then provide a report to Congress.

    On Unemployment: Failed Policy Cause of Problems

    Paul commented on the Labor Department’s jobs report for September 2011:

    “The national unemployment rate of 9.1 percent for the month of September says nothing new about our failed experiment with Keynesian economics. Simply put, all these years of Washington deficit spending and money printing did not move the labor market.”

    Yahoo

    Ron Paul: Consistent, Unrelenting Champion of Liberty
    Posted by Charles Burris on September 11, 2011 10:03 AM

    To Ron Paul, it has always been about integrity and first principles. For decades, Congressman Paul has been a consistent, unrelenting champion of international peace, the rule of law, and an opponent of all coercive threats to personal liberty, both foreign and domestic. Today, his GOP presidential opponents and their neocon agitprop flacks in the media desperately try to portray him as an anachronistic isolationist, a hopeless appeaser, a dangerous pacifist who ignores the “existential threat” of Radical Islam, especially the prospect of a nuclear-armed Iran. Their shallow reading and distortions of Ron Paul and his congressional record belie their ignorance.
    Latest LRC Articles

    The 21-Day Primal Transformation
    Ron Paul on Cainesian Economics
    Be Thankful You’re Not a Government Gasoline Yokel
    Buyback Blowback
    Protect Yourself from Your Government
    I Deny Global Warming
    It’s a Grand Old Flag, It’s a High-Flying Flag
    Peanut Butter Panic-Time?
    They’re Us
    The Fed Is Not Private
    A Plush Survival Bunker
    Want To Know the Real Ron Paul?

    Lew Rockwell
    Illegal Immigration

    A nation without borders is no nation at all. After decades of misguided policies America has now become a free-for-all. Our leaders betrayed the middle class which is forced to compete with welfare-receiving illegal immigrants who will work for almost anything, just because the standards in their home countries are even lower.

    If these policies are not reversed, the future is grim. A poor, dependent and divided population is much easier to rule than a nation of self-confident individuals who can make a living on their own and who share the traditions and values that this country was founded upon.

    Ron Paul’s six point plan puts a stop to illegal immigration:

    Physically secure our borders and coastlines. We must do whatever it takes to control entry into our country before we undertake complicated immigration reform proposals.
    Enforce visa rules. Immigration officials must track visa holders and deport anyone who overstays their visa or otherwise violates U.S. law. This is especially important when we recall that a number of 9/11 terrorists had expired visas.
    No amnesty. Estimates suggest that 10 to 20 million people are in our country illegally. That’s a lot of people to reward for breaking our laws.
    No welfare for illegal aliens. Americans have welcomed immigrants who seek opportunity, work hard, and play by the rules. But taxpayers should not pay for illegal immigrants who use hospitals, clinics, schools, roads, and social services.
    End birthright citizenship. As long as illegal immigrants know their children born here will be citizens, the incentive to enter the U.S. illegally will remain strong.
    Pass true immigration reform. The current system is incoherent and unfair. But current reform proposals would allow up to 60 million more immigrants into our country, according to the Heritage Foundation. This is insanity. Legal immigrants from all countries should face the same rules and waiting periods.

    The facts on the ground are being created right now. Every day that passes makes it more difficult to reverse the damage that has already been done.

    Illegal Immigration – Ron Paul
    Related articles

    7 DELEGATES EACH EARNED BY RON PAUL, Mitt & Santorum ! (2012patriot.wordpress.com)
    Ron Paul: Newt ‘Chickened Out’ (huffingtonpost.com)
    Ron Paul Raised $13 Million In 4th Quarter (outsidethebeltway.com)
    New Hampshire Press Endorses Ron Paul For President (mountainrepublic.net)

    Share this:

    Share on Tumblr
    Digg
    Print
    inShare3
    Email

    Presidential Candidate Leader Ron Paul
    Max Keiser In England!
    Max Keiser & Goldman Sachs

    Political Vel Craft.

    Blog at WordPress.com. Theme: Headlines by WooThemes. Fonts on this blog.
    Follow

  83. CW – and folks, Good morning.

    I received this last night. Don’t know if you’ve seen it yet.

    “Obama Motion to Dismiss Illinois Ballot Challenge”

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/79292578/Obama-Motion-to-Dismiss-Illinois-Ballot-Challenge

    And 3 separate ballot access challenges filed/pending..

    http://www.politicalhotwire.com/scandals-controversies/63992-3-separate-ballot-access-challenges-against-obama-filed-pending-illinois.html

  84. Cabby – AZ | January 30, 2012 at 12:29 am |

    “By now it should be obvious to anyone who is watching the unfolding scene…..”
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    You are absolutely correct in your assessment Cabby. I sense Santorum will most like drop out sooner simply due to lack of funds. Ron Paul will hold on until after the March or possibly April in order to continue to receive funds before he declares dropping out. This will then leave Mitt and Newt to battle it out for the remaining couple of months.

    It is true that Karl Rove and the GOP elite is behind Mitt and he will most likely become the Primary Candidate. However, if the winds should change and Newt becomes the Primary Candidate thus forcing the GOP elite to get on board, all will still not be well. One of the primary concerns with Newt is his leaning towards picking Marco Rubio as possible VP, non qualified as his NBC status would certainly create voting issues.

  85. Good Morning CW, et. al.

  86. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2839958/posts
    No Room for Allen West- or You- in Romney’s GOP
    Townhall ^ | January 29, 2012 | John Ransom

    Posted on Monday, January 30, 2012 8:44:29 AM by w4women

    Get ready for the all new GOP, under the lead of Mitt Romney.

    It’s a GOP where the Tea Party won’t be welcome, where the federal government will continue to bailout out banks and unions and everyone who’s anyone will continue to make money- except of course you and me.

    We’ll just continue to get stuck with the 100 year mortgage payment, as the GOP continues to be the “tax collector for the welfare state,” in the WSJ’s apt phrase.

    That’s the takeaway from Florida where Florida Representative Will Weatherford, a Romney proxy, helped redistrict Tea Party favorite Congressman and retired Col. Allen West into a much more liberal district than he previously represented.

    I guess Tea Party ideas of limited government and fiscal responsibility aren’t wanted in the GOP under Mitt.

  87. Good morning Zach, et al.

  88. All,
    This video identifies the eight Congressional attempts to change the NBC requirement for President…Worth listening and forwarding to networks..//M-P

  89. CW – Zach,

    Did you see this news?

    “Rachel Maddow Takes On Georgia Court’s ‘Birther’ Case Against Obama: It’s Like ‘Dividing By Zero”

    (snippet).

    ..On Thursday, MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow took on the “birther” movement, warning viewers not to Google “Obama born” lest they find themselves plummeting down an online rabbit hole of “crazy.”

    http://www.mediaite.com/tv/rachel-maddow-takes-on-georgia-courts-birther-case-against-obama-its-like-dividing-by-zero/

  90. All,
    This writer advances his perspective on the true definition of NBC…relative to the father being the control with regard to NBC. Linked below…//M-P
    http://beforeitsnews.com/story/1691/410/Natural_Law_And_Natural_Born_Facts.html

  91. “LIBERTY LEGAL SUES THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY”

    October 27, 2011

    Excerpt:

    “For several years now we have watched the controversy mount around Obama’s eligibility to hold the Oval Office. More and more questions are raised with no substantive answers. When Obama released his clearly forged “birth certificate” last Spring, it only added fuel to the fire.

    For several years now we have also watched numerous legal challenges fail and most media turn a blind eye. Meanwhile, Americans that understand that this is truly a Constitutional issue grow more and more frustrated. And this is truly a Constitutional question.

    The framers of the Constitution were careful to set separate and specific requirements that any candidate for the Presidency be a “natural born citizen”. All other Federal offices require the candidates to be citizens, but the Constitutional requirements for the Presidency are higher. The Founders did not want to risk that the leader of our nation have divided loyalties.”

    See The Entire Article Here: http://libertylegalfoundation.org/1214/liberty-legal-sues-the-democratic-party/

    * * * *

    “OBAMA DENIED AGAIN!”

    http://libertylegalfoundation.org/1640/obama-denied-again/

    * * * *
    “IS THE JUDICIAL BRANCH DEAD?”

    January 27, 2012

    “One of my earliest childhood memories is of my parents talking about Nixon and the Watergate scandal. I remember the newspaper headline: “Nixon Resigns!” President Nixon’s fight against court subpoenas made international news. Yesterday President Obama completely ignored a court subpoena, and the world shrugged.

    Obama’s behavior yesterday is even more disturbing than Nixon’s. Nixon at least respected the judicial branch enough to have his attorney’s show up in court and follow procedure. Nixon’s fight in the courts followed existing law. Nixon acknowledged the authority of the judicial branch even while he fought it. Obama, on the other hand, essentially said yesterday that the judicial branch has no power over him. He ordered his attorneys to stay away from the hearing. He didn’t petition a higher court in a legitimate attempt to stay the hearing. Instead he showed complete contempt for the entire judicial branch and for the rule of law. Rather than respecting the legal process, Obama went around the courts and tried to put political pressure directly on the Georgia Secretary of State. When that failed, he simply ignored the judicial branch completely.

    The rule of law, and our three-branch system of government, now hang in the balance. If the Georgia court issues a ruling on the merits and an order finding Obama in contempt of court, and if that contempt order actually results in real punishment of some kind, then we will still have a Constitutional Republic. If this doesn’t happen, then Obama will have been rewarded for showing complete contempt for the judicial branch.

    Understand that the goal of the Georgia ballot challenge was to have a court rule on the merits of the Constitutional question: Does the term “natural born citizen” in Article II of the Constitution require a Presidential candidate to have two parents that were U.S. citizens at the time the candidate was born? Obama wants to avoid having a court rule on this question. That is why he didn’t show up and ordered his attorneys to not show up. Obama was hoping that the Georgia court would enter a default judgment rather than rule on the merits. If the court enters a default judgment, Obama will have succeeded in avoiding the Constitutional eligibility question. He will then appeal the default judgment, get the appellate court to suspend the default judgment pending appeal, and then delay the appeal until after the primary. This is undoubtedly Obama’s plan.

    If the Georgia Court rules that Supreme Court precedent must be followed and therefore Obama simply does not meet the minimum Constitutional requirements to hold the office of President, then we will at least have succeeded in finding one court in the nation willing to do its job. If that court finds Obama in contempt of court, then we still have three viable branches of government. The Georgia court has the authority to do both of these things. The world should be holding its breath.

    Unfortunately the world is apparently unaware that our great Republic is on life support. The Roman Empire died a slow death. It’s death was so gradual that few people living at that time probably noticed the individual events that marked the death throes of that great empire. Apparently the same is true of America. Yesterday marked a stunning turn of events in the constant power struggle between the three branches of our government. Our President openly showed that he believes he is completely above the law. I wonder if the court even noticed its own death certificate. We will see in a few days.

    I will certainly try to explain this to the court in our proposed findings of fact and law that the court requested we file before February 5th. Please pray with me that Judge Malihi rules on the merits of our case.

    All of your encouragement and prayers have been greatly appreciated. They are needed even more over the next few weeks. This battle is FAR from over. And it has taken on importance beyond what we predicted (which is truly astounding). Please tell everyone you know about Obama’s contempt of the judicial branch. Please explain to them what it really means. Even those that agree with Obama politically and disagree with our ballot challenge should be shocked, appalled, and scared of Obama’s contempt for the judicial system.”

    Read More Here:
    http://libertylegalfoundation.org/1665/is-the-judicial-branch-dead/

    * * * *

  92. Thanks William.
    Yes, I did & I saved the idiot Maddow’s transcript.

  93. links not working

  94. “OBAMA ATTORNEY KNOWS ELIGIBILITY HEARING WAS DISASTER FOR THE PRESIDENT”

    By Coach Collins, on January 29th, 2012
    By Doug Book, Staff Writer

    http://www.coachisright.com/obama-attorney-knows-eligibility-hearing-was-disaster-for-the-president/

    * * * *

    MA BALLOT CHALLENGE LEGALLY CHARGES ON BY LTC READE

    Here is his complaint to SoS Bill Galvin. This is an excellent summary:

    http://obamaballotchallenge.com/taxachussets-ballot-challenge-by-retired-army-officer

    * * * *

  95. 8:57 am —

  96. “JUDGE RULES OBAMA MUST – PROVE – PRESIDENTIAL ELIGIBILITY IN GEORGIA COURTROOM ON THURSDAY”

    By Coach Collins, on January 23rd, 2012
    By Doug Book, Staff Writer

    Excerpt:

    “For those who have waited 3 years for a judge to finally rule that Barack Hussein Obama must prove that he is legally and Constitutionally qualified to run for or serve as President of the United States, the day may have come at last.

    For on Friday, Georgia State Office of Administrative Hearings Judge Michael Malihi ruled that subpoenas demanding the presence of Barack Obama in his Georgia courtroom on January 26th along with the original form of his Hawaii birth certificate and information on his myriad Social Security numbers will remain in force.
    Obama ‘s attorney Michael Jablonski had filed a motion to quash those subpoenas, arguing if Obama were made to answer questions before the court it would “…[require] him to interrupt duties as President of the United States…”

    [...]

    Though Obama has managed to ooze his way out of legal responsibilities and requirements in the past, this time it really might be a bit thick for the acting president. Even the radically leftist Southern Poverty Law Center has decided to weigh in, giving vent to a typically childish attack of spleen in its “Hatewatch” column no less, where it snivels “…Malihi’s decision has been heralded far and wide as a defining moment for those who have hounded Obama about his lineage.” (4)

    Apparently demands that Barack Hussein Obama actually abide by the laws of the land and the Constitution of the United States make for a clear case of “hounding” to an organization known to file suit at the drop of a conservative hat.

    Here’s hoping Judge Malihi’s courtroom turns liberal petulance to leftist rage on January 26th. For Malihi’s ruling that day will determine whether or not Barack Hussein Obama may be certified by the Democrat Party to appear on the Georgia ballot in November. And as the Liberty Legal Foundation explains it, “without such a certification from the Party, Obama will not appear on any ballot in the 2012 general election.” (5)”

    Use this site to contact your Congressional Representative:
    https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml

    1933—The 20th Amendment to the Constitution is ratified, designating the beginning and ending dates of terms for elected officials

    In this world you may have knowledge or you may have repose, but you may not have both. What have you done today to deserve to live in America?

    http://www.coachisright.com/judge-rules-obama-must-be-present-in-court-with-birth-certificate-and-social-security-info-on-january-26

  97. DEBT LIMIT – A GUIDE TO AMERICAN FEDERAL DEBT MADE EASY.

  98. Ron Paul’s way of seeing the US budget.

    * U.S. Tax revenue: $2,170,000,000,000
    * Fed budget: $3,820,000,000,000
    * New debt: $ 1,650,000,000,000
    * National debt: $14,271,000,000,000
    * Recent budget cuts: $ 38,500,000,000

    Let’s now remove 8 zeros and pretend it’s a household budget:

    * Annual family income: $21,700
    * Money the family spent: $38,200
    * New debt on the credit card: $16,500
    * Outstanding balance on the credit card: $142,710
    * Total budget cuts: $385

    WE HAVE A PROBLEM….

  99. Mornin folks!

    http://gulagbound.com/25619/why-did-obama-not-attend-thursdays-hearing-in-atlanta/

    Why Did Obama Not Attend Thursday’s Hearing in Atlanta?
    January 29, 2012, 4:10 pm

    White House Schedule Shows No Entries Until 1:00 PM

    (Jan. 29, 2012) – Barack Hussein Obama’s Georgia counsel, Michael Jablonski, had stated that it was “unreasonable1” to expect Obama to attend the ballot challenge hearing in Atlanta on January 26 at 9:00 a.m. ET.

    The White House has been posting Obama’s activities day by day this week2, and the schedule now reflects that his schedule was open on Thursday morning. However, The Post & Email has been told by a source that Obama watched the entire hearing remotely. Is that why his morning schedule was open?

    More:

  100. And Rick Santelli version

  101. William | January 30, 2012 at 6:11 am |

    Cabby – AZ | January 30, 2012 at 12:29 am |

    “By now it should be obvious to anyone who is watching the unfolding scene…..”
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    You are absolutely correct in your assessment Cabby. I sense Santorum will most like drop out sooner simply due to lack of funds. Ron Paul will hold on until after the March or possibly April in order to continue to receive funds before he declares dropping out. This will then leave Mitt and Newt to battle it out for the remaining couple of months.

    It is true that Karl Rove and the GOP elite is behind Mitt and he will most likely become the Primary Candidate. However, if the winds should change and Newt becomes the Primary Candidate thus forcing the GOP elite to get on board, all will still not be well. One of the primary concerns with Newt is his leaning towards picking Marco Rubio as possible VP, non qualified as his NBC status would certainly create voting issues.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    As an insider on the Paul campaign you would be WRONG…..Dr. Paul is going to stay in this to WIN IT……we are all behind him…..more and more coming on board everyday……Newter and Santorum aren’t even on all the ballots in all the states…..it really amazes me that some of you here are still sooo–o-o blind to what is going on…..you all complain everyday about the status quo and what they have done to the country yet you are willing to vote for two of the biggest status quo hero’s in our time……both O’romney and NEWTer are big time BIG GOVERNMENT hero’s propped up by the ESTABLISHMENT…..one a CFR member the other courted by the Biderbergs…….yet you all continue to push them and the MEDIA WHORE talking points!! Don’t you get it that electing them is just like putting BO back in office….come on….wake up folks!

  102. Thank you bc and Patriot4usa for your posts…..glad a few here know what is going on! God bless! :)

  103. http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/01/media_blackout_in_obama_georgia_ballot_eligibility_case.html

    Media Blackout in Obama Georgia Ballot Eligibility Case
    By Cindy Simpson

    Last week, I noted that Obama turned his back not just on Arizona’s Governor Jan Brewer, but also on the laws of the State of Georgia. I closed my column, “Georgia Ballot Challenge: Obama Walks on By,” with the observation: “And most of the media has followed along right behind him.”

    At the time, I had just witnessed an historic hearing that actually discussed the eligibility of the sitting president of the United States to run for a second term. The president had been subpoenaed to appear, and instead of his attorney respectfully following protocol to have that subpoena recalled, both Obama and his attorney, Michael Jablonski, simply failed to show up at all or offer any defense whatsoever.

    Isn’t there a headline in there somewhere?

    Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/01/media_blackout_in_obama_georgia_ballot_eligibility_case.html#ixzz1kxJhwwH4

  104. Straw poll: Santorum nomination would generate most tea party enthusiasm – TheDC

    Tea Party Patriots straw poll shows 35 percent of respondents said they would be most enthusiastic about Santorum

    Read more: http://dailycaller.com/#ixzz1kxL5ILZ1

  105. da verg | January 30, 2012 at 12:10 am |

    was my idea MORE THAN THREE YEARS AGO, .If I am……

    WRONG. I was one the one who initiated email with you and told you about it. You are definitely NOT a constitutional expert in the matter. You have a short memory, as well as lack of understanding on how to read the INS codes, historical precedence in recorded law, references to law. I point you to Leo Donofrios site where you can become further educated on matter of natural born citizen, minor case precedence, and other historical facts that completely decimate your posts on this blog.
    *******************************************************************
    Ah, good thing you are not in charge of the internet.

    Long before I set up my blog, I posted comments on other people’s blogs concerning ballot challenges. In fact, I first posted on NoQuarter, at around 3:00 AM and 5 hours later, at around 8:00 AM, the blogger who went by the moniker Judah Benjamin had posted the same idea on Texas Darlin’.

    (How did you get my email address BEFORE I set up my blog; and why were you emailing me before that time, anyway?)

  106. Moderation at 10:46.

  107. I’ve seen it somewhere so I apologize for not knowing, but what is the status of the eligibility challenge in other states? Are they having hearing?

  108. bc,

    Actually the removing of zero’s from the Budget did not derive from Ron Paul. I’m confident that Ron Paul and every politician agrees with viewing the simplicity of removing the zero’s for discussion points.

  109. For Santorum
    Share
    By Michelle Malkin • January 30, 2012 08:24 AM

    Rick Santorum opposed TARP.

    He didn’t cave when Chicken Littles in Washington invoked a manufactured crisis in 2008. He didn’t follow the pro-bailout GOP crowd — including Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich — and he didn’t have to obfuscate or rationalize his position then or now, like Rick Perry and Herman Cain did. He also opposed the auto bailout, Freddie and Fannie bailout, and porkulus bills.

    Santorum opposed individual health care mandates — clearly and forcefully — as far back as his 1994 U.S. Senate run. He has launched the most cogent, forceful fusillade against both Romney and Gingrich for their muddied, pro-individual health care mandate waters.

    He voted against cap and trade in 2003, voted yes to drilling in ANWR, and unlike Romney and Gingrich, Santorum has never dabbled with eco-radicals like John Holdren, Al Gore and Nancy Pelosi. He hasn’t written any “Contracts with the Earth.”

    Santorum is strong on border security, national security, and defense. Mitt the Flip-Flopper and Open Borders-Pandering Newt have been far less trustworthy on immigration enforcement.
    READ MORE……………

    http://michellemalkin.com/2012/01/30/for-santorum/

  110. jacqlynsmith,

    No politician enters into a Presidential race with the intent not to win or not stick it out for the long haul – however long that may be. Eventually, only one will be selected, and it will not be Ron Paul.

    It will only be a matter of time – a short one at that – before you come to the realization that Paul simply doesn’t have the numbers to win. It will be an I told you so from many.

    I do fear at that time, you will most likely rant and blame everyone in this blog for not supporting Paul, rather than understand the dynamics from the outset. If you believe that flooding the blog with continuous Ron Paul support will change a single person to vote for Ron Paul in the Primary, I believe you are setting yourself up for a temper-tantrum similar to that of your RAP days.

    Its unfortunate, but braced for it.

  111. Jonah | January 30, 2012 at 11:07 am |

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    I truly hope Santorum finds a way to stay in this race.

  112. MUST READ ARTICLE!!

    “FED GOV COLLECTING NAMES OF PREPPERS”

    December 15, 2011

    “For several years now I’ve been advising people to invest in emergency supplies, including long-term food storage. While others are buying gold and silver, I’ve told people to start with buying food and other supplies. It just makes sense. You can’t eat gold, but you can re-sell food.

    Now, because of some very disturbing news I received this week, I have to add some very important caveats to this advice. Apparently the Federal government is collecting names of people suspected of storing food. You can read the details at the following LINK to the Oathkeepers site.

    Understand that I am very skeptical of anything I read on the Internet, unless and until I can verify the information. In this case I know the person who wrote this story. He is a trustworthy source. I have also personally visited the food distribution facility referred to in the story, and know the person in charge of the facility. As far as I can tell, this story is true.”

    See The Entire Article Here:
    http://libertylegalfoundation.org/1445/fed-gov-collecting-names-of-preppers/

    * * * *

    MUST READ ARTICLE!!

    “FOOD STORAGE MANAGER CHANGED HIS STORY”

    December 15, 2011

    Excerpt:

    “[...] Why would the LDS facility manager tell one story to one person, then change the story later? Two answers are likely. First, he almost certainly didn’t anticipate the amount of attention this story would get. Second, he almost certainly didn’t know that he could be charged as a criminal for telling the truth about an event of public interest. That’s right, under the Patriot Act the LDS facility manager could have been criminally charged for telling ANYONE that Federal agents asked him about his customer list.

    Now, I don’t know that the LDS manager was threatened with criminal charges. But it seems to fit the facts. I have little doubt that Rand Cardwell was telling the truth, that the LDS manager initially reported that Federal agents asked for a customer list, and that the Federal agents became threatening in order to obtain the information. I believe that the LDS manager later changed his story. I know that the Patriot Act gives Federal agents the right to press criminal charges against a person that tells any third party about the Federal agents’ attempts to collect information. So, it seems likely that Federal agents asked for the list, the LDS manager told the Oath Keepers, the story exploded on the Internet, the Federal agents threatened the LDS manager in order to get him to change his story, and he did exactly that.

    Whether I’m right or not, we should all be appalled that the Federal government has granted its agents clearly unconstitutional authority to write secret warrants and threaten private citizens for doing nothing more than reporting what the Federal government is doing to its own citizens. These aspects of the Patriot Act are undeniably unconstitutional, regardless of whether they were used against the LDS manager in this particular case.”

    Must Read The Entire Article Here: http://libertylegalfoundation.org/1447/food-storage-manager-changed-his-story/

    * * * *

  113. “GOING TO ARIZONA”

    December 6, 2011

    “Today Liberty Legal Foundation filed a motion for a preliminary injunction with the Arizona Federal Court asking that the Democratic Party be prohibited from sending any document to any state asserting that Barack Obama is Constitutionally qualified to hold the office of President or certifying that Obama is the Democratic Presidential nominee or requesting that Obama’s name be placed on any ballot. Our motion and proposed order can be viewed on our web site.

    Our motion is as simple as a motion can be. It asserts one uncontested fact and one legal definition, which is quoted directly from the Supreme Court. Our only argument for this motion is this: Obama’s father was never a U.S. citizen and the Supreme Court has defined “natural-born citizen” to be a person with two U.S. citizen-parents. This leaves the Democratic party only two options: Argue that Obama’s father was a U.S. citizen, or argue that the Supreme Court definition of natural-born citizen isn’t what it clearly is. They will NOT argue the former. They will argue the latter. This means that we will be exactly where we want to be: arguing what the definition of natural-born citizen is under the U.S. Constitution. This is the argument we want to have.

    Some may ask why we aren’t addressing the birth certificate or the social security number or the various other inconsistencies in Obama’s history and documentation. The reason is that confusion is the primary tool of legal defendants. If the defense can bring up a myriad of facts and legal jargon to confuse the issue, they win. If we raise every issue that is out there, the defendants will focus on our weakest argument and move the debate to their advantage. We want to control the argument and focus the Court to the major and most clear issue – the fact that Obama is not a “natural born citizen” by his own admission.

    Today we are in Phoenix Arizona meeting with Sheriff Joe Arpaio regarding our mutual efforts to bring Obama’s ineligibility to light. Tonight I will be appearing with our lead Plaintiff in the Certification Class Action lawsuit, Presidential candidate John Dummett, before area Tea Party leaders and members. Liberty Legal Foundation is grateful to have members in all 50 States and around the world. However, if you happen to be in Phoenix, Arizona tonight, please come join us at this event.”

    See The Entire Article & Much More Information Here: http://libertylegalfoundation.org/1422/going-to-arizona/

    * * * *

  114. William | January 30, 2012 at 6:11 am |
    One of the primary concerns with Newt is his leaning towards picking Marco Rubio as possible VP, non qualified as his NBC status would certainly create voting issues.
    ******************************
    Yes, that is my great concern, too, William. Then we “birthers” will have another job on our hands. I agree with you about Paul. Of course, he intends to stay in the race until the end, but he can get what he wants without finishing a race he cannot win. He wants desperately to have an influence on the Party, secure a speaking slot at the convention, and pave the way for senator son, Rand.

  115. Starla | January 30, 2012 at 11:30 am |
    “GOING TO ARIZONA”
    ****************
    Thank you, Starla, for bringing this to our attention.

  116. “TOO MANY BATTLES TO FIGHT”

    December 20, 2011

    Excerpt:

    “Just yesterday we agreed to step in to help a Georgia citizen convince the State of Georgia that our Constitution requires Presidential candidates to have TWO U.S. citizen parents. This challenge would have the Georgia Secretary of State keep Obama off the Democratic primary ballot because Obama isn’t a natural-born citizen. You can see our filing in that case on our web site. [LINK] If you read the motion, you will see the stunning argument by our sitting President that a popular vote of the people overrides Constitutional limitations. You will see our response to that argument on pages 7 & 8 of our filing.

    This latest state action means that LLF has active legal challenges to keep Obama off the ballot in four different states. We’ve filed in Tennessee, Arizona, New Hampshire, and Georgia. We agreed to this latest action for several reasons. First, and most importantly, the judge hearing this matter appears to be impartial. Meaning we may actually get a fair hearing. Second, Georgia has clear election codes that require their Secretary of State to strike any candidate who isn’t qualified to hold the office sought. Third, Georgia code also explicitly grants Georgia citizens standing to challenge any candidate’s qualifications to hold office. Most states don’t have such codes.

    ***** Now for the frustrating news: we turn away requests for help every day. This is why we need your support. We’ve had several requests to file challenges to Obama’s Constitutional qualifications in Texas, Alabama, North Carolina, Florida, California, New Jersey, Michigan, and Virginia. I’m sure I’m forgetting some. This month alone we’ve gotten three requests for Liberty Legal to file amicus briefs in various cases. Just today we got another request in a case challenging the Constitutional basis for zoning laws which allows for the unconstitutional infringements of Agenda 21. *****

    We want to take on these battles. We simply don’t have the resources to fight them all.

    We are doing as much as possible with your donations. In addition to the certification lawsuits mentioned above, we are filing Supreme Court amicus brief on Obamacare in our attempt to get Wickard v. Filburn overturned. We’re still pressing the Federal Court in Texas to rule on our preliminary injunction in the OCA. On the immigration front, we’re also filing a Supreme Court amicus brief in U.S. v. Arizona. We will be the only group in that case to point out that the Obama administration’s policy violates existing Federal law. We are working towards helping groups in Alabama and Texas with their Obama ballot challenges.

    Liberty Legal Foundation is very grateful for all the support we’ve received. But there are so many important battles that are not being fought simply because we don’t have the resources to fight them all. We want to do more. Please give what you can to help us continue our work to restore our Constitutional Republic. Thank you.

    Still looking for gift ideas? Check out our online stores for Liberty Legal Class Action gear.”

    Certification Class Action
    Immigration Class Action
    Obamacare Class Action

    MUST READ MORE HERE:
    http://libertylegalfoundation.org/1455/too-many-battles-to-fight/

    * * * *

  117. Cabby,

    I will certainly be paying attention to Rand Paul’s voting record for the years to come.

    It will be interesting to see who is going to battle Head-to-Head with Hillary Clinton is 2016.

  118. The establishment is fighting back!! Allen West is under attack!!

    Allen West being redistricted out of existence in effort led by Romney Florida spokesman
    (quote)
    One of the rising stars of the Tea Party is about to be sacrificed by the Republican establishment in Florida, led by someone spinning for Mitt Romney.
    Don’t say you weren’t warned.

    Read more:
    http://patriotsforamerica.ning.com/forum/topic/show?id=2734278%3ATopic%3A325813&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_topic

  119. “BUSY DECEMBER, BUSY YEAR COMING”

    December 30, 2011

    “This year has been increasingly busy and next year looks to continue the trend. Here’s the latest:

    Certification News

    This week the Georgia Court of Administrative Hearings granted our motion for a separate hearing and set a hearing date of January 26th in our bid to prevent Obama from appearing on the Georgia ballot. The Court’s order and our motion can be viewed on our web site HERE. Other cases will be presented after ours, but we will be going first. This is important because our arguments are very short, simple, and different from the arguments being made by others.

    The hearing will be held at 9 AM in Room G-40 of the Fulton County Justice Center Building, 161 Prior Street, Atlanta, Georgia. We don’t yet know whether the public can attend. We will find out soon and let you all know. We would like to pack the courtroom to let the judge know that the public supports our efforts.

    ***** Also in January the National Democratic Party and DNC Chairman Debbie Wasserman Schultz have a deadline to respond to Liberty Legal Foundation’s Certification Class Action federal lawsuit and preliminary injunction. They will almost certainly file a motion to dismiss and attempt to avoid the substantive Constitutional issue raised by our lawsuit. We’ll update you as soon as any response is filed by the Defendants. *****

    We will be setting a hearing date in mid-February for our preliminary injunction motion filed in the Tennessee state CCA lawsuit. That hearing will be held in Memphis, Tennessee. We will let you all know as soon as a time and date is set.

    Obamacare News

    We are currently working on our Supreme Court amicus brief in support of the State of Florida against Obamacare. As you know we will be the only group arguing for the complete overturn of Wickard v. Filburn.

    Illegal Immigration News

    As soon as our Obamacare amicus brief is filed we will be preparing another Supreme Court amicus brief in support of the State of Arizona in U.S. v. Arizona. Again, we will be the only group making the argument we’re presenting. In that case we’re the only group pointing to existing Federal Law that is being violated by the Department of Justice and the Obama administration.

    State’s Rights News

    Earlier this month I met with the Board of Directors for the Tennessee Sheriff’s Association to gain their support for a Liberty Legal Foundation re-drafted Tennessee bill that will set the groundwork for nullification with teeth in Tennessee. This bill allows for arrest of any federal agents that attempt to enforce any unconstitutional law within the state of Tennessee. (TN SB1108/HB959 Campfield/Dunn). This bill gives teeth to its companion bill, which was also supported by Liberty Legal Foundation and introduced in the Tennessee legislature last year. (TN SB620/HB 1212 Campfield/Ragan). The companion bill establishes a committee within the Tennessee legislature to review all existing federal laws for Constitutionality, and to submit a list of all unconstitutional laws to the Tennessee legislature for nullification.

    After it was introduced earlier this year national radio talk show host Neal Bortz discussed this bill and said that he thought it was a great idea. Since then a Utah organization has begun forwarding an identical bill to conservative state legislators across the country. Liberty Legal representatives will be meeting with at least a dozen Tennessee legislators over the next several weeks to shepherd the passage of these bills.

    As you can see, December has been a busy month, and next year is already looking to be even busier.

    Must Read More Here:
    http://libertylegalfoundation.org/1465/busy-december-busy-year-coming/

  120. William | January 30, 2012 at 11:54 am |
    Cabby,

    I will certainly be paying attention to Rand Paul’s voting record for the years to come.
    *************************
    Yes, I am impressed with Rand so far. He is in the Senate now because of the strong Tea Party support. After seeing what appears to be happening in FL re. Rep. Allen West, we can expect attacks to be made against Rand eventually. There is nothing like a national election to separate the wheat from the chaff when it comes to the Republican Party elitists.

  121. Cabby,

    Something else I am grappling with at this time for a strategic move by the Democrat Parties future, and that is Hillary Clinton. I believe if the Presidential race is even remotely jeopardized with Obama, Hillary will replace Biden. This will accomplish two major issues.

    First, this would bring in the voters from the Dem party that are still sore at the treatment the Obama machine did to Hillary. This would also bring in those from the Independent party (and a few dems) that have buyers remorse.

    Second, this would help immensely with setting up Hillary for 2016 to succession as being in the V.P. seat, rather that the SoS position. The days of any SoS running for the Presidency are far gone. James Buchanan being the last. It’s simply a difficult transition today. I belied at one time Gen. Powell could have pulled it off, until his U.N. speech on Iraq and a few more thereafter.

    I don’t put anything past the Dems to pull a wacko (wabbit) out of the hat (arse). Strategy, Strategy, Strategy…

  122. William | January 30, 2012 at 12:14 pm |
    Cabby,
    Something else I am grappling with at this time for a strategic move by the Democrat Parties future, and that is Hillary Clinton. I believe if the Presidential race is even remotely jeopardized with Obama, Hillary will replace Biden. This will accomplish two major issues.
    =============================
    William,
    I fear you are right about this.

  123. jbjd tell me if i’m wrong but did you say that anyone born in the US no matter the status of the parents are Natural Born Citizens? if that is correct why did the framers use the term NBC and not just citizen and why didnt congress word the 14th amendement to say anyone born here are NBC instead of just citizen? by your logic that would mean if Hugo, Dinnerjacket,and maybe even OBL could have sent anyone over the border, bread them in the finest schools, fool the people and elect them as President? to me that is a scary thought.

  124. William | January 30, 2012 at 12:14 pm |
    Something else I am grappling with at this time for a strategic move by the Democrat Parties future, and that is Hillary Clinton. I believe if the Presidential race is even remotely jeopardized with Obama, Hillary will replace Biden. This will accomplish two major issues………..
    I don’t put anything past the Dems to pull a wacko (wabbit) out of the hat (arse). Strategy, Strategy, Strategy…
    *********************************
    Agree again, William. The Dems (those who are not fully in sync with the Obama machine and also those who care about their “Party”) could well come to a point where they will do the musical chairs trick with Hillary.
    We all have heard that she says she will NOT run, but talk is cheap; anyway, the Clintons are not known for their truthfulness.

    Have you all noticed the makeover of Mssss Hillary (thanks, Old Salt for the Msssss title :) ) ? What a facial transformation. Yes sirree, she is probably getting ready for something BIG. I’ll tell you who is behind this:
    Pat Caddell and Doug Shoen, Dem party operatives – much nicer and more moderate than most. At least, she is moving in the right? direction? I should have said “left”.

    Hmmmm…..now how do they get rid of Biden? An appeal to save the Party? Let’s watch this one unfold. Huh? Any ideas? It doesn’t hurt to do some intelligent forecasting!

  125. A Crazy Old Coot

    Cabby – AZ | January 30, 2012 at 1:25 pm |
    ///////////////
    I believe biden is here to stay. He makes Mr. obama look good and takes the heat off Mr. obama (or whatever his name is).

  126. William………………
    I realise that what you are saying with regard to Hillary could easily happen. That would happen primarily because the same UNINFORMED public would support her who supported numbnuts. In reality she is NO different than Soetoro,nor is she any brighter. The only thing she has any experience at is being a President’s wife. Further I point to her lack of accomplishment in statesmanship as well. So far as SOS she has accomplished NOTHING meaningful. If she was to run for POTUS and by some crux of fate win we would be right back where we started in 2008. Then there is the still the matter of her unresolved activities regarding Whitewater. The public hasn’t yet forgotten it. No offense against you,just a little of what I think. We can’t afford to be set back to 2008 again, and to in any way attempt to resurrect Hillary would certainly take us there. With our country already dangling by a very thin thread to have Hillary gain the presidency would take us into the abyss.

  127. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    Starla | January 30, 2012 at 11:30 am |
    “GOING TO ARIZONA”

    ____________________________________________

    Here is a real gem of a statement. This is the predicament we are in.

    “Some may ask why we aren’t addressing the birth certificate or the social security number or the various other inconsistencies in Obama’s history and documentation. THE REASON IS THAT CONFUSION IS THE PRIMARY
    TOOL OF LEGAL DEFENDANTS.!!!”

  128. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    PS – This is all that is necessary to solve the problem -

    “The Dirty Little Secret of the Natural Born Citizen clause”

    http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2012/01/27/the-dirty-little-secret-of-the-natural-born-citizen-clause-revealed/#comment-20850

  129. I had a discussion with a friend over the definition of NBC. This time instead of talking about the definition of NBC I decided to try to appeal to logic. I first got him to agree that the qualifications to be POTUS should be stricter in regards to citizenship in comparison to all other positions. In other words, just being a citizen is fine for a senator but not a president. So he agreed that NBC is more restrictive than a citizen. I then showed him the US governments view on dual citizenship which basically says it’s accepted but frowned upon due to issues it may cause. I then stated that if dual citizenship is frowned upon by our government how in the world could it possibly be acceptable for the POTUS to be born with dual citizenship!? I know it made him think…but he’ll never admit to it. He couldn’t really argue so he changed the subject

  130. Thanks for the info, everyone.

  131. A Crazy Old Coot

    I had a thought, “IF” billery got elected, would the male staff be in as much danger as the female staff were with the “teflon kid”??

  132. Old Coot………………
    Oh yeah, Biden the CLOWN. To me he is the ICING ON the MORON cake.(If there is such a thing). He is always getting his tongue wrapped around his EYE TOOTH, and then can’t see what he is saying. I think that most of the LEFTIES even know this which is one reason why you rarely see anybody speaking to him, or for that matter even STANDING IN CLOSE PROXIMITY to him. I tend to think that they are really afraid that some of the BS coming from Biden’s oral cavity might inadvertantly splash on their shoes or trouser legs.

  133. The divide in the country is so large, that we will have to rally around whoever gets the repub nomination. The more i hear of Romney, the more I dislike him. Fred Thompson, who I believe is a straight shooter, said on the weekend that Romney ran such an ugly campaign that all who ran against him hated his guts when it was all over. Makes no sense that McCain (mr irrelevant) came out and endorsed him. I just don’t trust him. Nevertheless, like ive said before, we need to work at keeping the house and winning the Senate with true conservatives. That would certainly keep whoever wins in check.

    From what Ive seen of Romney, he tries to stay the Mr Nice guy and lets his super pacs do all the lying dirty campaigning. Newt is fighting a tough battle. He still remains ahead in the national polls, just hope a defeat in Fla doesnt kill that. Looks like the tea partiers are rallying behind Newt and the establishment doesnt want their good times shaken up. All I can say is good grief.

  134. BYE BYE FROM my dirty little trailer in slime city.

  135. A Crazy Old Coot

    My opinion is this: Anyone Mr. Rino (McCain) endorses is not the one for me.
    If the left is wanting to run against someone (Romney) then that is not the one for me.
    Anyone that does not want to repeal obamacare is not the one for me.

    Just the opinion of a dumb ole (Natural Born Citizen) country boy.

  136. Cabby and others,

    The goal of the DNC is no longer to pinch hit Hillary Clinton. I believe, strategically, it makes more sense to do the following. This is provided that Obama has no chance:

    1. Obama will resign after multiple pardons.
    2. Biden will pardon Obama.
    3. Bill Clinton will be gifted the DNC nomination.

    Off we go to the election.

    I will still believe that the Constitution has been violated, we no longer have rule of law, and Bill Clinton will provide yet another China-gate.

    Pete

  137. As far as I see it, Paul, Romney and Gingrich are all running nasty campaigns. Ron Paul was as nasty against Newt in Iowa as Romney was. None of these guys is afraid to go at it and Santorum can hold his own too; although, he’s been more positive because he doesn’t have as much money as the others. The mud is slinging all over and this year we need a nasty person to go up against the ultimate mud slinger on the other side. So just let them go at it. They have to learn to defend themselves because Obama will be even nastier.

  138. This could really cinch things up, if this were to be allowed. And it is not beyond reason, since Jablonski entered a copy of the birth certificate into the record.

    This is another brilliant move by Orly Taitz. She never gives up.

    http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Farrar-v-Obama-Emergency-Request-for-Leave-of-Court-to-petition-Supreme-Court-for-Letter-Rogatory.pdf

  139. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    Why isn’t this all the proof we need to put this USURPER on ice?

    “US Senate Resolution 511 puts the ice on it Obama has never been a Natural Born Citizen case closed”

    http://dancingczars.wordpress.com/2011/04/26/us-senate-resolution-511-puts-the-ice-on-it-obama-has-never-been-a-natural-born-citizen-case-closed-2/

  140. Pete | January 30, 2012 at 2:32 pm |

    I understand your reasoning behind your comment, however it lacks logic and balls. What you are saying depends on variables that conclusively at this time are not possible, mainly getting the GOP to admit they were part of the most massive violation of the Constitution in the placement of Obama as a candidate. Until they “grow some” and rectify their participation (or find a way to weasel out of it) they are stuck in denial mode. And for that, they will lose, and so will we.

  141. OldSalt,

    The Problem (as you know) is public awareness and forgetfulness. The Clinton’s had both “Hillarygate” and “Clintongate” baggage. Very serious Baggage at that, to put it mildly. I was recently on a website that listed both “gates” during their 8 years in the WH and it was an astonishing. Many I had even forgotten about and well over 100 “gates” investigations.

    But the Media will never announce that, nor will they remind or educate the public. The U.S. media today would make Joseph Goebbels and the NSDAP blush!

    Just saying what is obvious and the truth.

  142. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    As far as the Clintons – Just google up “The Clinton Chronicles”

    That is when I decided our nation was in trouble!!

    Here – I’ll do it for you

    https://www.google.com/#hl=en&sugexp=pfwl&tok=NY-VoiKIhun_pz7wyQMwNw&cp=13&gs_id=1l&xhr=t&q=The+Clinton+Chronicles&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&source=hp&pbx=1&oq=The+Clinton+C&aq=0&aqi=g4&aql=&gs_sm=&gs_upl=&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.,cf.osb&fp=b760c267e252527&biw=1333&bih=663

  143. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    PS – Plus The Clinton Legacy

    http://prorev.com/legacy.htm

  144. I bought David Barton’s book Impeachment. It’s really cheap at amazon.com. For those that don’t know who David Barton is, he has been on Glenn Beck several times and has the largest private collection of original documents from before 1800, so he is VERY smart with history.

    In the book, it says that Impeachment can’t be pardoned. Very interesting since we have been worried about Holder being pardoned by Obama.

    I highly recommend the book since it also talks a lot about judges being impeached for not doing a good job. In an interview I saw, David Barton said that in the early days, judges got impeached if they swore (even during personal time) as it wasn’t “proper behavior”. We really need to get the judicial branch under better control, they have WAY too much power now..

  145. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    PPS – And he was a LAWYER TOO!!!

  146. A Crazy Old Coot | January 30, 2012 at 2:12 pm |

    ++++++++++++++++++

    Old Coot,

    You are correct. That is also called “Correlation by Association”.

    When you said, “Just the opinion of a dumb ole (Natural Born Citizen) country boy”, I had to smile.

    Because you see, the last time I checked my history, it was a bunch of dumb Ole country boys that kicked the hell out of the British Empire during the organization of 13 colonies in what is now known as the United States.

    What also amazes me is that a Dumb Ole Country Girl kicked the hell out of the same English Empire in 300 years prior and her name was Joan of Arc!

    What is it with Dumb Ole Country people that can organize, fight for freedom and liberties, and kick the shite out of the most powerful armies known in history, and win?

    Sounds like a proud time to be a dumb Ole Country boy/girl to me. History always repeats itself when history lessons are ignored. Maybe that’s why Janet Reno issued strict warnings against dumb ole country people? She read her history…

  147. Correct:

    Not Reno. I meant Janet Napliano. Not Reno.

  148. Old Coot,

    Main comment hung up in moderation. Sorry

  149. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    For you older ones like myself, do you remember a movie with Doris Day with either James Garner or Rock Hudson in which they are going to get a divorce and they are sitting in the lawyer’s office both yelling at each other. Meanwhile, the two lawyers are discussing about themselves and what country clubs they are members of and finally agreeing on getting together at one of their clubs for lunch!!!

    THINK ABOUT THIS – Most of our illustrious politicians FROM BOTH PARTIES are lawyers. Some of you might have heard of Stengaleeze, well here is a samle of leagaleeze – “I know you believe you think you know what I said, but I don’t think you realize that what you heard is NOT what I meant.”

  150. Courtesy of Katie who posted this on a sister blog:

    There WERE MSM reporters at the GA hearing, and they refused to report their findings!

    Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/01/media_blackout_in_obama_georgia_ballot_eligibility_case.html

    Thanks, Katie!

  151. A Crazy Old Coot

    William | January 30, 2012 at 3:40 pm |
    I appreciate your kind words, but I really am a dumb ole country boy. Born in KY and raised in KY and TN. I never made it through college and have to rely on my own knowledge and experiences. I always believed that if I smelled a skunk then there was a skunk around somewhere. And with this election I smell a skunk.

  152. Mr. Bill(ms. helga) | January 30, 2012 at 3:55 pm |

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Well,

    Historically, I can conclude, today’s attorneys do not hold the interest of this Country, rather they are now self serving and manipulative.

    Kind of like a Hacker blaming the weakness in a Banking program is the reason he steels, and justifies it.

  153. Lets Play WHAT IF:

    All the elgibility controversy today is based on Barack Hussain Obama’s white mommy, Stanley Ann Dunham, being MARRIED to that drunken African Barack Obama I.

    WHAT IF when little 18 YEAR OLD Stanley Ann had baby Barack (wherever), she WASN’T married to anyone?

    Now, a senerio like that would make little baby Barack legally a bastard, but would it not also make him a “natural-born” citizen because legally he had no daddy?

    Could this be what the mlitiary judge was alluding to when she said that to disclose this information “would have been an “embarrassment” to the president?”

    Could this be why little Barry doesn’t want to release any records about his personal life at all…….

    Maybe poor little Barry didn’t have a daddy he could claim when he was born, or one that would claim him…

    Will that be his defense for destroying America, if the truth of the matter is ever known?

    Of course none of this accounts for his adoption to the Indonesian, Lola Sorteoro….which still makes him a Naturalized citizen, an not elgible to hold the office.

    “Oh what wicked webs we weave, when first we start to deceive”.

  154. Ray | January 30, 2012 at 2:34 pm |

    This could really cinch things up, if this were to be allowed. And it is not beyond reason, since Jablonski entered a copy of the birth certificate into the record.

    This is another brilliant move by Orly Taitz. She never gives up.

    http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Farrar-v-Obama-Emergency-Request-for-Leave-of-Court-to-petition-Supreme-Court-for-Letter-Rogatory.pdf
    —————————————————————————————–

    Yet dead silence from Certificater’s and internet lawyers that B-HO has now filed his JPEG/BC in 2 state administrative courts.

    That is why I have always said he was probably born in Hawaii.

    A British Subject at Birth.

    I can’t wait to say I told ya’ll ( you all in redneck) so…………

  155. Hay Pat…..Looks like Orley has Mr. Jabolenski by the short hairs AGAIN…..

    Damn, he must be one stupid lawyer.

  156. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    CW – As you state on this post -

    “Of course, the Democrat National Convention will be held in Charlotte, NC this year. You can bet that the State of NC will prioritize that event over upholding the US Constitution.”

    As Rush always states – “Follow the money trail!”

    Isn’t Bank Of America’s corporate headquarters in Charlotte?

    TOO BIG TO FAIL!!!

  157. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    PS – I am glad you said “Democrat” and Not “Democratic”. That drives me nuts.

  158. Mr. Bill……..

    With a “lame duck” Governor, both houses of government in NC controlled by the Republicans…and looking like they will also take the Governorship in the next election..

    That doesn’t leave O’bummer and his Mafia much wiggle room , except in Charlotte.Where I’m sure he will be received as King, but not by all.

    I’m willing to bet, if O’bummer makes it to a general election that he will LOSE big time the state of NC.

  159. Bill…..yes the BOA headquarters is in Charlotte…also the Bank of America football field which will hold 74,000 people.

    Mr. O’Bummer plans to give his acceptance speech to a packed house here….

    The democrats think they will fill the place to overflowing. Anyone want to bet on that?

  160. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    rminnc – What worries me are those 15 Electoral College votes. The Dems are pulling out all the stops to keep them(ECV). Conventions have always been Big Bribes. Did anyone here that a group were going to fly a banner over the Super Bowl that Obama was Not Legit?

    I’ll try to find it and post it.

  161. How’s This Hopey and Change Stuff Working Out For You ?

    Here’s recap of Hope and Change since President Obama took office in Jan 2009. Comparing economic indicators starting in Jan 2009 to present day:
    1. Federal debt has increased by 43% from $10.6 trillion to $15 trillion.
    2. Americans living in poverty have increased by 16% from 39.8 million to 46.2 million.
    3. Total unemployment (U6) has increased by 68% from 13.7 million to 23 million.
    4. Price of gasoline has increased by 80% from $1.86/gal to $3.35/gal.
    5. Americans on food stamps have increased 42% from 31.8 million to 45.2 million.
    6. Home foreclosures per year have increased by 34% from 850,000 to 1,140,000.
    7. Total bankruptcy filings per year have increased by 42% from 1,117,641 to 1,593,081.
    8. Median Household incomes have declined by 4%.
    9. Average selling price of new homes has declined by 10%.
    10. US dollar compared to foreign currencies has declined by 8.7%. [US dollar index of 85.9 in Jan 2009 to 78.5 in Dec 2011.]
    11. US dollar compared to gold has declined 105%. [ $855/ounce to $1750/ounce

    NOW ANYONE WHO SAYS HE NEED FOUR MORE YEARS OF THIS CRAP, NEED TO SEE A DOCTOR, A SHRINK DOCTOR

  162. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    rminnc | January 30, 2012 at 4:56 pm |
    How’s This Hopey and Change Stuff Working Out For You ?

    $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

    AND THAT’S THE GOOD NEWS!

  163. BILL…..

    I don’t know how much good that will do…remember

    Minneapolis dome has a ROOF……game to be played indoor.

  164. bankroller | January 30, 2012 at 4:45 pm |
    Snoop Dogg endorses Ron Paul. . .
    ****************
    I didn’t take the time to read the link, but that endorsement is no surprise to me. He is right in line with a number of others who gravitate toward the “free spirit” of libertarianism, meaning less restraint upon drug use, etc., and some other activities most decent people would call immoral. THAT IS NOT A CRITICISM OF DR. PAUL.

  165. sorry…should have been Indy dome…..

  166. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    rminc – Change the game till August.

  167. Take heart and be at peace, at least until election day, for……….

    Any Republican we nominate will beat Obama this fall if the
    elections are fair. According to Rasmussen on radio today
    of the roughly 13% of undecided voters, most don’t like Obama.
    He did NOT state what the split between the (R) and (D) 87% is but
    I predict high numbers in the (R) columm.
    As (R) voters we have the unprecedented luxury of having our fall-back
    choice of Romney running close to the top.
    A more conservative choice by us methinks would lead to a massive
    destruction of the demonrat party which we would all relish. YUM !! I can
    taste it from here in Fly-Over Wisconsin. Want cheese and a beer with that?

    When the adults are back in charge we will see true change, BACK to the
    principles, ideals and ideas that made us great. Most important and prudent
    is seeking and developing energy, leaving behind the environmental and
    man-made global warming freaks/misfits. If you take offence to that then obviously you are one and I correctly labeled you as such.

    Other items of interest I reviewed today……….

    The Pretender-In-Cheats deserves a criminal warrent.

  168. Yes, Bank of America HQ in Charlotte.

  169. Warrant, of course.
    Posting a chore today. Slow and jerky on my end.
    Anyone else?

  170. It’s been a while and I must be brief.

    In 1787, Barry couldn’t have been a Natural Born Citizen because his parent’s citizenship situation never existed. Repeat, no “wife” kept their citizenship back then, so this scenario never applied. No law in the colonies or the United States at the time granted citizenship to be passed from mother to child. Amendment XIV fixed the citizenship part, but not the sovereign transfer of citizenship solely by a woman. So, based on this situation and the fact Article II has never been amended, this definition still stands today. No case has set any kind of representative precedence, not even Perkins-v-Elg.

    SCOTUS may decide otherwise, but every case being cited or serving as precedence, including Kim, occurred before women could transfer citizenship to their children. So, no case prior to 1930 can be used because there’s nothing to match Barry’s birth scenario. They considered the mother’s citizenship to be irrelevant! We can argue until we’re blue in the face. Only SCOTUS can define what it means today. Everyone else, including the lower courts can certainly try, but they better not base it solely on prior decisions where inequality was at play.

    That being said, those who understand history understand the allegience aspect of this. However, courts have difficulty getting their arms around this concept, so don’t hold your breath on a thorough and accurate interpretation any time soon.

    OK, back to my hole. Take care.

  171. Since i am afraid to visit orly’s site, can’t deal with ANOTHER virus….what is the news from there in a nutshell

  172. I think Joseph Farrah from WND will be on Hannity tonight.

  173. rminnc | January 30, 2012 at 4:33 pm |

    Hay Pat…..Looks like Orley has Mr. Jabolenski by the short hairs AGAIN…..

    Damn, he must be one stupid lawyer
    —————————————————————————————
    One could say he’s boxed in. If the BC he submitted is true and correct ( which I think it is) B-HO has offered evidence that he is 14a citizen.
    Not NBC as dfined by SCOTUS in MvH.

    If I were to venture down the BC rabbitt hole , I would guess that he was adopted somehow. But it doesn’t matter, they will never disclose that unless B-HO consents. He never will, he would be personally destroyed.
    Son of a Kenyan and all of that……..

  174. OK… This is my point of view from my home state VA….

    I have gone through the gammit of candidates from Bachman to Cain to Perry to Santorum to Gingrich to Romney… always resisting Paul… largely because of his foreign policy stance.

    At one point I was extremely PO’d because I learned that my only choice in the primary in VA is Romney and Paul. But now I am sort of glad.

    For what it’s worth, from a state that probably doesn’t count that much, I will vote for Paul, in large part because of IB. I took a second look at him, and despite his abnoxious followers (not you, IB), I believe he is the candidate that will do the least harm to our country.

    Hey, didn’t he, as a doctor, take the Hippocratic oath… “First of all, do no harm”? Our country is sick.

    I am SO sick of this back and forth between Gingrich and Romney. They are ripping each other apart and pretty much destroying the conservative movement in the process. AND ALL FOR THEIR OWN AGGRANDIZEMENT!

    Never thought I’d do it but I WILL vote for Paul.

  175. L.L. Bean Heiress Linda Bean Endorses Ron Paul

    Reports CNN:

    Linda Bean, an heiress to famed Maine outfitter L.L. Bean, came out in support of Ron Paul on Saturday as the candidate made a campaign swing through the state.

    Bean, who is a part owner of her family’s company and sits on its board, said she is a longtime supporter of the Texas congressman. She backed his 2008 presidential bid, but hasn’t made a public endorsement in the current race until now.

    “I’ve been for Ron Paul for years,” Bean said. “I watched his House races in Texas, and he’s just true blue. He doesn’t waver from the Constitution and I like that very much.”

    Bean made her endorsement at the lobster restaurant she owns in Freeport, situated across the road from L.L. Bean’s large flagship store. She singled out Paul’s appeal across the political spectrum as a reason for her support.

    “He’s very electable, he crosses all ideological lines because of his strong message,” Bean said. “He’s for the gold standard. I think people want stability in this country. He’s for helping America domestically, and staying out of aggressive wars. We’re just spending ourselves down the drain in these countries year after year with occupation.”

    When asked why she wasn’t supporting fellow New Englander Mitt Romney, Bean said, “I’ve always been for Ron Paul.”

  176. OK Jeff…then you are saying, in a nutshell :

    Barry could have been born a little bastard and he still wouldn’t be a “natural-born” citizen….

    Gottcha….thanks

  177. Will Ron Paul win more delegates this week than Gingrich, Santorum?

    Ron Paul is likely to win more delegates to the 2012 GOP convention than either Newt Gingrich or Rick Santorum this week. Wait. What? That’s why he campaigned in Maine this weekend.
    http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/The-Vote/2012/0130/Will-Ron-Paul-win-more-delegates-this-week-than-Gingrich-Santorum

  178. Posted by: Dean C. Haskins (birthersummit.org)

    “Before the day of the hearings, jbjd came to the same conclusion.”

    “I also commend jbjd.org as trustworthy commentary that cuts through the deceptive hype many in our movement have blindly accepted at face value.”

    http://www.birthersummit.org/news/80-georgia-hearings-two-out-of-three-aint-bad.html

  179. There for awhile, they were trying to float the fact that Obama’s mama was single at the time. (per Moochelle herself)….that spurred a bunch of speculation on both sides. Never got any traction. They float trial balloons all the time…..not sure what to believe anymore

  180. I am sure we will start getting the Kenyan bc stuff soon. Anything to get you on another false lead…..or somewhere else to divert the attention.

  181. Newt knows it’s over so he wants to take Romney out.

    Attacks on Mitt’s religion are coming next. Newt has no class.

    http://harndenblog.dailymail.co.uk/2012/01/gingrichs-closing-argument-romney-is-a-liberal-who-is-no-different-from-obama.html

  182. one thing i am certain (i think, lol)…..If Stanley was single and if he was NOT born in the US, then she was not old enough to convey her citizenship.

  183. A Crazy Old Coot

    rminnc | January 30, 2012 at 5:08 pm |
    /////////////////////
    It may have a dome over it, but the roads leading up to it and the parking lot do not. People will see the banner!!

  184. From “US Department of State” site:

    “Birth Abroad Out-of-Wedlock to a U.S. Citizen Mother”

    “A person born abroad out-of-wedlock to a U.S. citizen mother may acquire U.S. citizenship under Section 309(c) of the INA if the mother was a U.S. citizen at the time of the person’s birth and if the mother was physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the person’s birth. The mother must be genetically related to the person in order to transmit U.S. citizenship.”

    http://travel.state.gov/law/citizenship/citizenship_5199.html

  185. Michelle Obama:

    “Obama used the roundtable audience, as she did yesterday, to describe her husband’s understanding of women’s issues through the prism of the strong — but sometimes struggling — women in his life.

    His own mother, she said at the beginning of her remarks, was “very young and very single when she had him.” ”

    http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/07/10/1193601.aspx

  186. InsiderAdvantage Poll: Gingrich Surging, Race ‘Tighter Than Expected’

    http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/gingrich-romney-insideradvantage-poll/2012/01/29/id/425901

  187. OK Gordo….

    If Muchellllle said he was a llittle bastard…that’s good enough for me.

  188. A Crazy Old Coot

    I always thought that of him. Oh! you mean single mother. My mistake!

  189. Coot, very cute!!

  190. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens.

    yes but it DOES NOT SAY NATURAL BORN CITIZENS….get a clue for once jbjd

  191. Long before I set up my blog, I posted comments on other people’s blogs concerning ballot challenges. In fact, I first posted on NoQuarter, at around 3:00 AM and 5 hours later, at around 8:00 AM, the blogger who went by the moniker Judah Benjamin had posted the same idea on Texas Darlin’.

    (How did you get my email address BEFORE I set up my blog; and why were you emailing me before that time, anyway?)

    >>>you sent me your e mail address, and then took my ideas and posted them.

  192. will ron pauler’s please take your message to w w w . m o o n b a t . c om

    website, please ?

  193. I spent many vacation years in Maine. They have lots of trouble with jobs there. They love to hunt. In fact, all the schools have to close during hunting season as most everyone takes their kids hunting; they value that over education. Hunting can be great sport so I am not knocking it. They are very self-reliant in Maine. They often drink gallons and gallons of beer. They are very independent, and are often openly anti-Semitic. I use to hear openly in stores, restaurants and elsewhere people say how cheap the Jews are. It is a big thing there. In fact, while people in the North often say they are less racist than people in the South, it is in Boston and in Maine that I have heard some of the most racist and anti-Semitic statements in my experience. Not surprised at all that some people in Maine might be for Paul, and that is not a compliment.

  194. Observer & Rob
    ~~~~~~~~
    observer | January 29, 2012 at 10:49 pm | Rob | January 29, 2012 at 10:29 pm | Obama attorney knows eligibility hearing was disaster for the president
    http://www.coachisright.com/obama-attorney-knows-eligibility-hearing-was-disaster-for-the-president/

    ===========================
    Excellent summary of how the mighty may be held by their big toes by the little ones they walk over and dismiss so easily
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~
    I found these comments posted at coaches site

    Max Maximus · 10 hours ago
    Just heard on the news this morning that of all states, guess which state has now risen to the top of consideration for not one, but two new nuclear power plant facilities to be built? You guessed it, Georgia…

    Should be interesting to watch how this plays out over the next month or so. LOTS of backroom negotiations on the line here now with BILLIONS of dollars in construction jobs, federal revenue, state tax revenues and more at stake.

    My guess is, this entire thing quietly goes away and Brian Williams will report “Nothing to see here yet again folks…just move along…just keep moving…” Reply
    2 replies · active 8 hours ago 0 Vote up Vote down Gayle · 9 hours ago
    Thanks for the info Max. Let’s see if we’re sold out again. Reply 0 Vote up Vote down Oldpuppymax · 8 hours ago
    Max,

    The KEY WORD being CONSIDERATION. The Regime might wave this like a carrot, but I don’t believe Ga. officials would be stupid enough to fall for the obvious bait. And even if the Regime were to GRANT Ga the right to build, lawsuits from whack-job environmental groups would delay the thing for years, or decades! Nope. If this is the Regime’s ploy, they are wasting their time

  195. Contact Alan West, ask him to join as a plaintiff, bring eligibility before Congress. Talk is cheap, actions matter

    http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=30904

  196. bc | January 30, 2012 at 5:59 pm |

    Will Ron Paul win more delegates this week than Gingrich, Santorum?

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    I don’t know whether to “sigh or yawn” at this ill informed comment BC?

    Geezz.. Ok, lets look at it for your sake and 2 other posters on this site that support Ron Paul as if he has some miracle by the hands of God to win this…..primary.. (to begin with)..

    First and foremost, if anyone was paying attention to the Florida Ballots, (just for starters) Ron Paul is in is 3rd place. No surprise there. Secondly, Ron Paul is barely pushing above a single digit, ie.. 11 percent, plus or minus 3 percent – as if that margin is a big deal.. Furthermore, who ever told you that Ron Paul will win more delegates this week than Newt, has lied to you!

    No other way to explain it. The LOWER part is Ron Paul and Santorum. Both barely above a single digit.

    But lets not stop there… I am also confident that you are aware of the complete GOP candidate schedule, by State in each month for votes, correct? In otherwords, when Newt in February rises above Mitt, its because it mostly due to the States in the South East. And in March, Mitt will rise above Newt mostly due to the States in the West. And in May…. Well you get the point.. Nowhere is Ron Paul a figure in this.

    Ron Paul, once ran off his on ticket, a libertarian, he garnished a whooping.43% (yes that is less than 1 percent) of American votes. He learned from that. Same as the Communist learn not to run on their own ticket and instead run off the Democrat ticket.

    You and Ron Paul Impress me how? Convince me..with something I don’t know…..

  197. Pat 1789 | January 30, 2012 at 5:54 pm |

    If I were to venture down the BC rabbitt hole , I would guess that he was adopted somehow. But it doesn’t matter, they will never disclose that unless B-HO consents. He never will, he would be personally destroyed.
    =========================
    That’s probably what the Occidental College records will confirm….entrance as foreign student; lived in foreign students dorm; freshman roommate a Pakistani! Why they went into a panic when records were “subpoenaed” by Kreep which they stated was a legitimate request. They then went to their attys who contacted Obama affiliated attys who threatened with highest possible monetary penalty if didn’t stop the filing. Those are some of the discovery requested in GA hearing.

  198. Request: what are all the states who are challenging ballot eligibility and where are they and the latest in their activity listed? Thanks.

  199. Romney will have Michael Chertoff as co-chair of his counterterrorism and intelligence advisory committee.
    Chertoff, as you might know, is heavily invested in the naked body scanners that are at odds with our 4th amendment rights.
    The more things “change” the more they will stay the same…

  200. The polls are being used to shape the election, just as the diebold machines are being used to select the new puppet…of the elites, by the elites, for the elites.

  201. http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/

    January 30, 2012
    OBOTS AT WORK…
    Arpaio’s Phoenix offices temporarily evacuated

    PHOENIX (AP) — The downtown Phoenix offices of Sheriff Joe Arpaio were temporarily evacuated Monday morning because of a suspicious envelope addressed to the sheriff containing a white, powdery substance.
    A spokesman refused to release details to the The Associated Press until an afternoon news conference.
    The Arizona Republic (http://bit.ly/yp8VBf ) reports the envelope was opened on the 19th floor of the Wells Fargo building where the sheriff’s office has its headquarters. The unknown substance was found inside the envelope.
    A Phoenix Fire Department hazardous materials crew responded.
    The crew removed the envelope, and people working in the area were allowed to return.
    Officials were still investigating. No injuries were reported.

  202. As Rush always emphasizes, The Democrat Party is not really a Political
    Party per se.
    It is a loose coalition of groups designed/destined to support each others
    agendas, similar to coalitions that form governments in the libs beloved
    Socialist Europe.

    Surely now we collectively can come up with some ideas as to how to
    splinter this coalition.

    Help me identify the groups first, then label their main agenda.
    From there we perhaps can figure out ways to unglue that horrendous
    coaltion and smash the demonrats forever, or maybe just 100 years.

    Environmentalists………..slow down development using all means

    Blacks………………maintain the big government plantation

    Feminists……. . trash all things male, saving gay rights, preserve
    ……………………..abortion.

  203. NBC_Vic_Hern | January 30, 2012 at 8:41 pm |

    +++++++++++++++++++++

    NBC,

    You are certainly on the right track.

  204. Catholic Church Rejects Surrender Terms from Obama

    read more: http://gulagbound.com/25673/catholic-church-rejects-surrender-terms-from-obama/

    My Catholic priest, Father Larry Swink, delivered a homily on Sunday that I told him would make headlines. In the toughest sermon I have ever heard from a pulpit, he attacked the Obama Administration as evil, even demonic, and warned of religious persecution ahead. What was also newsworthy about the sermon was that he cited The Washington Post in agreement—not on the subject of the Obama Administration being evil, but on the matter of its abridgment of the constitutional right to freedom of religion.

    What is happening is extraordinary and unprecedented. The Catholic Church is in open revolt against the Obama Administration, with Fr. Swink noting from the pulpit that priests across the archdiocese were joining the call on Sunday to rally Catholics to resistance against the U.S. Government. He said we are entering a time of religious persecution and that Catholics and others will have to make a final decision about which side they are on.

    The issue is what the Catholic Bishops have called a “literally unconscionable” edict by the Obama Administration demanding that sterilization, abortifacients and contraception be included in virtually all health plans.

    At a time when the media are full of reports about who is ahead and behind in the polls, and who will win the next Republican presidential primary, this incredible uprising in the Catholic Church is something that could not only overshadow the political campaign season, but also may have a major impact on the ultimate outcome—if Republicans know how to handle it. This matter goes beyond partisan politics to the growing perception of an unconstitutional Obama Administration assault on religious freedom. To hear the Catholic Bishops and Priests describe it, our constitutional republic and our freedoms hang in the balance.

  205. Interested Bystander

    SueQ commented:

    “I will vote for Paul, in large part because of IB.”

    Thank you SueQ.

    I beleive Dr Paul is what the Country NEEDS right now.

    Tina commented:

    “In fact, while people in the North often say they are less racist than people in the South, it is in Boston and in Maine that I have heard some of the most racist and anti-Semitic statements in my experience. Not surprised at all that some people in Maine might be for Paul, and that is not a compliment.”

    But Tina you CONTINUALLY claim Paul is “anti-Semitic” without showing PROOF of such a comment.

    I have on more than one occasion pointed you in directions that would prove your statement false, but you continue to comment it.

    It kind of makes your comments moot Tina, maybe if you would quit trying to indoctrinate people with FALSE accusations, your comments coud be taken seriously, until then, they go in the trash can where they belong.

    da verg,

    We are NOT going anywhere.

    Dr Paul’s message is getting out, and the more people that actually LISTEN to his message, instead of listening to the media’s indoctrination of what they “think” Paul’s message is, the more they like it.

    And maybe Rand can continue the growth and turn it in to a REAL movement come 2016.

    I have stated on many occasions that I will look for the BEST person to do the job come election day 2012, and if that is someone other than the “big two”, then so be it, they will get one vote in the Hoosier State.

    But during THIS process, Dr Paul is the BEST person for the job, at least in this voter’s opinion.

  206. Gingrich likes to parade as a constitutionalist. In fact, he is a sworn enemy of the Constitution. His Contract With America was one of the most unconstitutional pieces of legislation to ever come down the congressional pike. It proposed amending the Constitution with a “balanced budget amendment,” a completely unnecessary proposal if Congress would only act on constitutional programs.

    Gingrich’s Contract also allocated a ton of money to unconstitutional “federal crime-fighting measures, despite the Constitution’s prohibition on federal involvement in police matters outside of piracy and treason. Countries that do not have such strict constitutional safeguards on federal police end up with Gestapos, KGBs, and Departments of Homeland Security,”

  207. Why would someone buy preps and not use cash?? DUH!
    I have _____ years stored, and NEVER used anything but!!!

  208. Hi JJ, everyone is still around!

  209. Grassley says Obama is behaving dictatorially, ‘usurping legislative powers’

    Iowa Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley accused President Obama of dictatorial behavior in a floor statement Thursday, saying that his recess appointments were not the first acts he has taken to circumvent the constitutional system of checks and balances.

    “President Obama’s decision to bypass the constitutional advice and consent of the Senate is not an isolated incident,” Grassley said, according to prepared remarks. “It is merely the latest escalation in a pattern of contempt for the elected representatives of the American people and the constitutional separation of powers.”

    Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/01/30/grassley-says-obama-is-behaving-dictatorially-usurping-legislative-powers/#ixzz1l08Y3iiJ

  210. IB, I have constantly posted links and statements on Dr. Paul on his anti-semitism from numerous authors and groups. The Republican Jewish convention had a whole article on why they refused to allow him to speak to their group that I posted. You’ve either missed them or refused to believe them. Not my fault. You are a Paulbot and an admitted pro-porno libertarian, but you will never convince me to vote for Paul.

  211. Hey, you mean they aren’t gonna sue them too?

    http://www.breitbart.tv/white-house-wont-condemn-occupyoakland-riots/

    White House Won’t Condemn Violent #OccupyOakland Riots
    January 30, 2012 at 3:27 pm – WH.gov
    Dateline: Washington, D. C.
    “Well, with regards to Oakland that’s obviously a local law enforcement matter. Here in Washington I would refer you for specifics to the U.S. National Park Services and U.S. Park Police and our position has been and continues to be that we need to balance first Amendment concerns, the right to demonstrate, the right to speak freely with public safety concerns and public health concerns and we understand that local law enforcement as well as National Park Service and U.S. Park Police are weighing these considerations when making these decisions and that’s appropriate.”

  212. IB: Dr Paul’s message is getting out, and the more people that actually LISTEN to his message, instead of listening to the media’s indoctrination of what they “think” Paul’s message is, the more they like it.

    ———–

    I think the more they listen, the less they like it especially when they learn Dr. Paul went on Iranian TV, is a truther, and won’t build a border fence because it will keep Americans in. He is running for the GOP nomination, but is trying to win that nomination by getting support from folks on the radical left.

    Also, if he is so strong on the Constitution, why won’t he stand up in Congress and boldly challenge Obama’s eligibility? He is a hypocrite just like the rest of them. Just mho.

  213. Ron Paul has been standing up for our rights for a very long time. He’s the only one that has, but has been labeled a kook etc. by foolish people who do not do any research and accept what the mudstream media tells them. The fault lies with the synchophats. You can’t blame Ron Paul for the state of this country!

  214. da verg,

    We are NOT going anywhere.

    paul votes in iowa, florida, new hampshire and south carolina
    ZERO

    you are going NO WHERE FAST

  215. Mispelled word: should have been sychophants

  216. Pat 1789..you are so wrong….

    Okay—stay with me here and try to follow.
    1) why did Pelosi reword the nomination document to Hawaii and remove the constitution clause in the second mailing?? well, because the Hawaii democrat commitee returned/rejected/whatever the document and Pelosi knew why; hence, the new document with wording (cause she was pushed for time)to remove/delete the clause and Hawaii acepted the new one with the constitution clause removed.
    2) why did Hawaii reject the wording of the nomination document identical to the other 49 documents mailed?? Could it be because they had knowledge the other states didn’t have????—THAT THERE WAS NO BIRTH CERTIFICATE IN THEIR HEALTH DEPT. FILES??? bingo!
    3) Tim Adams worked in Hawaii then for the election commission and has an affidavit stating it was well known in Hawaii the BC didn’t exist—he even has begged to be called to testify to this
    4) the more serious the lies and deception became apparent and obvious, the deeper in doo doo Hawaii Dept. of Health became culpible in all the crimes

    ANY QUESTIONS??

  217. It is the Washington Post, which I hate, but what the heck, Ron Paul’s secretary, a supporter, said he read every word of his newsletters.

    This is a fun article:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ron-paul-signed-off-on-racist-newsletters-sources-say/2012/01/20/gIQAvblFVQ_print.html

  218. David Limbaugh: ‘I’d Vote for Santorum’

    “It’s no mystery. I’d vote for Rick Santorum,” David Limbaugh tweeted to his brother Rush Limbaugh on Friday. The night before, during the Republican debate, an audience member asked the GOP candidates, “…how would your religious beliefs, if you’re elected, impact the decisions that you make in the office of the presidency?” Santorum answered:

    “Faith is a very, very important part of my life, but it’s a very, very important part of this country… the Constitution is the “how” of America. It’s the operator’s manual.

    Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/01/david_limbaugh_id_vote_for_santorum.html#ixzz1l0bpE73P

  219. By the way, I want to say, Maine itself is a beautiful state. If you have never been to Bar Harbor or Acadia, you should go, in the summer, of course.

  220. Jonah | January 31, 2012 at 12:04 am |
    ======================
    I n M o d e r a t i o n a g a i n

  221. William | January 30, 2012 at 11:08 am |

    jacqlynsmith,

    No politician enters into a Presidential race with the intent not to win or not stick it out for the long haul – however long that may be. Eventually, only one will be selected, and it will not be Ron Paul.

    It will only be a matter of time – a short one at that – before you come to the realization that Paul simply doesn’t have the numbers to win. It will be an I told you so from many.

    I do fear at that time, you will most likely rant and blame everyone in this blog for not supporting Paul, rather than understand the dynamics from the outset. If you believe that flooding the blog with continuous Ron Paul support will change a single person to vote for Ron Paul in the Primary, I believe you are setting yourself up for a temper-tantrum similar to that of your RAP days.

    Its unfortunate, but braced for it.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Time will tell but my prediction is if Dr. Paul isn’t nominated we will be stuck with BO another 4 years….millions are awake and KNOW that the status quo establishment RINO’s will just be more of the same so we will be either writing in Dr. Paul’s name or voting for a third party candidate….either way the GOP can not win without the Ron Paul supporters …pure and simple!

  222. Cabby – AZ | January 30, 2012 at 11:37 am |

    William | January 30, 2012 at 6:11 am |
    One of the primary concerns with Newt is his leaning towards picking Marco Rubio as possible VP, non qualified as his NBC status would certainly create voting issues.
    ******************************
    Yes, that is my great concern, too, William. Then we “birthers” will have another job on our hands. I agree with you about Paul. Of course, he intends to stay in the race until the end, but he can get what he wants without finishing a race he cannot win. He wants desperately to have an influence on the Party, secure a speaking slot at the convention, and pave the way for senator son, Rand.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Dr. Paul is in it to win it and he isn’t going anywhere……you all think it is about voting….it’s NOT it’s about delegates……we are getting bunches of delegates as we go…the media whores don’t tell the truth so if you are going by what they say you are sadly mistaken……I am part of the grassroots pushing the doc to the head of the class……I would question how many here are even involved with a campaign other than typing here on a blog!

  223. Ron Paul: The Last One

  224. kim | January 30, 2012 at 8:37 pm |

    The polls are being used to shape the election, just as the diebold machines are being used to select the new puppet…of the elites, by the elites, for the elites.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Kim….are you on facebook??? Many Paul supporters hang out there and know what is going on if you want to join us???

  225. Interested Bystander | January 30, 2012 at 9:13 pm |

    SueQ commented:

    “I will vote for Paul, in large part because of IB.”

    Thank you SueQ.

    I beleive Dr Paul is what the Country NEEDS right now.

    Tina commented:

    “In fact, while people in the North often say they are less racist than people in the South, it is in Boston and in Maine that I have heard some of the most racist and anti-Semitic statements in my experience. Not surprised at all that some people in Maine might be for Paul, and that is not a compliment.”

    But Tina you CONTINUALLY claim Paul is “anti-Semitic” without showing PROOF of such a comment.

    I have on more than one occasion pointed you in directions that would prove your statement false, but you continue to comment it.

    It kind of makes your comments moot Tina, maybe if you would quit trying to indoctrinate people with FALSE accusations, your comments coud be taken seriously, until then, they go in the trash can where they belong.

    da verg,

    We are NOT going anywhere.

    Dr Paul’s message is getting out, and the more people that actually LISTEN to his message, instead of listening to the media’s indoctrination of what they “think” Paul’s message is, the more they like it.

    And maybe Rand can continue the growth and turn it in to a REAL movement come 2016.

    I have stated on many occasions that I will look for the BEST person to do the job come election day 2012, and if that is someone other than the “big two”, then so be it, they will get one vote in the Hoosier State.

    But during THIS process, Dr Paul is the BEST person for the job, at least in this voter’s opinion.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    IB….great post……I came to the same conclusion in 2008….I will NEVER vote for the lesser of two evils again…..just look at the division here with NEWTER and OROMNEY……Dr. Paul is a UNITER…..he is leading with INDEPENDENTS and the young people ……that’s who elected BO….this time they are awake and going to elect the only ONE standing for WE the people! Thanks for your great insight…..wish more folks here were waking up! Don’t give up though…..I see you converted SueK…..I have been trying to do the same for months! Great work! :)

  226. da verg | January 30, 2012 at 11:24 pm |

    da verg,

    We are NOT going anywhere.

    paul votes in iowa, florida, new hampshire and south carolina
    ZERO

    you are going NO WHERE FAST

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    BOY are you misinformed…..which MEDIA WHORE told you that??

  227. Tina | January 31, 2012 at 12:04 am |

    It is the Washington Post, which I hate, but what the heck, Ron Paul’s secretary, a supporter, said he read every word of his newsletters.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    We should believe here WHY???? OH….someone paid her off to say that….I SEE! DUHHH!!!

  228. This is for you people who like polls…

    press release

    Jan. 30, 2012, 7:15 p.m. EST
    Ron Paul in Close Competition With Obama in Latest Poll
    New poll shows Texas Congressman within margin of error to unseat incumbent President

    Santorum and Gingrich are losing ground to Obama

    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/ron-paul-in-close-competition-with-obama-in-latest-poll-2012-01-30

  229. Ron Paul’s Shovel Ready Foreign Policy

    Ron Paul’s non-intervention foreign policy will kick-start Main-Street Economies across the country.Moving military bases home will revive local economies and provide better protection to the American People
    http://www.nolanchart.com/article9192-ron-pauls-shovel-ready-foreign-policy.html

  230. GORDO, as always, thank you.

  231. MORE truth to listen to and pass on…….

    Bill Wood AKA Bill Brockbrader Original Interview Transcript now posted

    click here for the transcript

    http://projectcamelotproductions.com/interviews/bill_wood/bill_wood.html

    A CALL-OUT TO ALL NAVY SEALS AND CURRENT AND EX-MILITARY PERSONNEL

    If you are outraged by my interview with Bill Brockbrader and you don’t believe he was a Navy SEAL, I invite you to turn your analysis in the direction of the military authorities that you hold in such high esteem and entertain the notion that there is a parallel organization that is way above TOP SECRET that is working counter to your organizations.

    This is your big opportunity to come face to face with the real military industrial complexity that Eisenhower warned us about… and you will realize that there is a rogue highly extensive SECRET GOVERNMENT operating above top secret handling things that you know nothing about…

    This is the story that we have been exposing from the beginning of Camelot back in 2006.

    I would also encourage you to read RICHARD DOLAN’S BOOKS: UFOs and the NATIONAL SECURITY STATE Volumes I & II… click here for those books…. as your primer to understanding how this black project community has been operating since the days of Truman and likely before that… Then watch every Project Camelot interview and read all the material from whistleblowers on our site. And then we can talk!

    A lot of you are suggesting I haven’t done my research… actually I have and its documented all over Project Camelot. The trouble is… you guys are so busy taking orders you forgot to do your OWN research and free your minds from the Machine!!! This is your wake up call. Make of it what you will.

    Kerry Cassidy
    Project Camelot

    http://projectcamelotproductions.com/blog-hp.html

  232. Americans for Dr. Ron Paul
    The Florida Primary is tomorrow!
    Revolution PAC will be broadcasting the results live over the the web. So, if you’re tired of the garbage coverage that we’ll get from CNN and Fox, please check this out! Sign up on the website to be reminded of when the broadcast starts (6:00 – 7:00 PM Eastern Time, tomorrow, Tuesday, January 31st)!
    http://revolutionpac.com/Florida-Primary-Broadcast/
    RevolutionPAC – FL Primary Broadcast
    http://www.revolutionpac.com

  233. Anonymous Judge Blows the Whistle: America is nothing more than a large Plantation and ‘We the People’ are the Slaves
    The Vatican-Led Illuminati Matrix and U.S. Constitution

    The hidden truth behind the formation of America

    http://www.in5d.com/anonymous-judge-blows-the-whistle.html

  234. Interested Bystander

    Tina,

    You never cease to amaze me.

    First you comment that you don’t like the WAPO, but then you link an article.

    You think the article may be a little “biased”??

    HMMMM???

    But from the artcile you linked there are TWO lines that claim Paul read the newsletters before they went out

    One a secretary:

    “It was his newsletter, and it was under his name, so he always got to see the final product. . . . He would proof it,’’ said Renae Hathway, a former secretary in Paul’s company and a supporter of the Texas congressman’s.”

    You notice that … after product? That means that more was said, and I wonder what it is, but you probably don’t Tina, you simply take the words as they are written, which is a BIG problem Tina.

    The other was this from a former assistant:

    “Dondero Rittberg said he witnessed Paul proofing, editing and signing off on his newsletters in the mid-1990s.”

    Well, well, someone who was fired from Paul’s staff says something Tina agrees with and links the article as if it were the truth. I’m wondering just how many times did Mr Rittenberg actually “witnessed” Paul proof reading the newsletters?

    And if he “witnessed” them being proof read by Paul, why didn’t he bring this up during his campaign to regain a seat in Congress?

    Interesting stuff though Tina, because the SAME article also states this:

    “Mark Elam, a longtime Paul associate whose company printed the newsletters, said Paul “was a busy man” at the time. “He was in demand as a speaker; he was traveling around the country,’’ Elam said in an interview coordinated by Paul’s campaign. “I just do not believe he was either writing or regularly editing this stuff.’’

    And this:

    “Jesse Benton, a presidential campaign spokesman, said that the accounts of Paul’s involvement were untrue and that Paul was practicing medicine full time when “the offensive material appeared under his name.” Paul “abhors it, rejects it and has taken responsibility for it as he should have better policed the work being done under his masthead,” Benton said.”

    But Tina, the FACT is that this is really a NONissue. Paul has taken responsibility, he has rejected the content, and it’s time to move on.

    You REALLY annoy me with your rhetoric.

    I won’t even give your “anti-Semitic” blah blah blah a response.

    It gets old after a while.

  235. Interested Bystander

    Tina,

    I know you won’t, but PLEASE watch the video in this article.

    http://www.worldofjudaica.com/jewish-news/jewish-community/ron-paul-banned-from-republican-jewish-coalition-debate-this-month/5687/52

    I am still trying to find the article on why he was banned from the debate.

    This was the first article I came accross.

    I’ll find it, because I want to know.

  236. Interested Bystander

    Tina,

    Is this the article Tina?

    http://www.rjchq.org/Newsroom/newsdetail.aspx?id=fb9991c6-514f-4836-8e42-4822d84df7ea&type=inthenews

    It seems to me that this author believes that Israel NEEDS our “aid”.

    I couldn’t disagree with this author more.

    I agree with Dr Paul, and what he states in the video in the comment above.

    Look, I’m TRYING to have a civil debate with you, and YOU continue to pick and poke at me about my views on many different issues.

    I haven’t even looked to see how “tall” Dr Paul is.

    Maybe he’s the tallest candidate Tina, and THAT would pursuade you.

  237. Interested Bystander

    Tina,

    The author even states in the article that the “aid” we give Israel is spent on AMERICAN weapons.

    What a joke, we give them money so they can give it back to us.

    Now THAT makes all the sense in the World.

  238. Interested Bystander

    Tina,

    By the way,

    Have you noticed how our National Debt keeps going up and up and up?

    It will be over 16 TRILLION dollars before the year is over.

    Heck Tina, during an OFF year the Government received 6% MORE in tax revenue this year than the previous year, and we STILL added 1.2 or 1.3 TRILLION dollars to the National Debt.

    Don’t you think getting THAT under control is MUCH more important than ANYTHING else?

    But NOOOO, we have to listent to hour upon hour of Newt is claiming Romney this, or Romney blasts Newt over this or that.

    But the ONE man who is ADDRESSING the ISSUE is deemed to be a “kook”.

    Our priorities are misplaced.

  239. BOY are you misinformed…..which MEDIA WHORE told you that??

    >>>>the PEOPLE of iowa, Florida, South Carolina and New Hampshire. Four states, Paul got ZERO delegates, ZERO NONE NADA, fourth and fifth place finishes. Ron Paul has no chance, even if he goes third party, obama beats him hands down.

  240. From the administrator at HermanCain forums…….more people waking up…..

    I am extremely disappointed in Herman’s endorsement of Newt Gingrich
    « on: Today at 07:02:49 AM »

    This is very hard for me to write for I was an staunch Herman Cain supporter. Most of the members of our forum supported Herman because we believed he was an outsider in the presidential race for the republican party. We viewed him as a common sense businessman that could bring great traditions and ideas back to this country to fix this huge mess we are in today.

    Our forum hosted 2 fundraising events for Herman Cain, we supported him with all our heart and soul, we believed in him.

    Shortly after Herman dropped out of the race our forum voted to endorse congressman Ron Paul for president for he was the only outsider left in the presidential race for the republican party. We were asked to endorse Newt Gingrich, in short we declined because we here knew that Gingrich is not a conservative, he is a progressive, big spending, big government guy and his past record showed this. Gingrich made millions off the tax payers and just under 2 million alone from Freddie Mack the housing lender that took billions of dollars in tax payer bailout money while millions of people lost their homes. Newt claimed in an earlier debate he was paid $30,000 a month as a historian, we knew this answer was bullshit just like most of what comes out of Newts mouth. Then last week he claimed he was paid as a consultant, yes this sounds more like it, so again Newt lied just like he usually does, By The Way : Consultant is the alias for lobbiest.

    Most of us here knew Gingrich was not a conservative and this is why we refused to endorse Gingrich, but now Herman Cain has endorsed the one person in the race that is the furthest from conservative as you can get compared to the other candidates. Why did Herman do this? I can only believe that Herman has sold out and sold out his supporters by his endorsement. The Herman Cain we all knew and supported would have never endorsed Gingrich.

    After our endorsement of Ron Paul we here still supported Herman Cain and said if he were to jump back in the race he would have our full support and we meant it.

    I am now left to believe that Herman was not the man we thought he was, he wasn’t the outsider at all, if he really was he never would have endorsed the biggest insider in the race. There was some other motive here and it has left me to withdraw my support for Herman Cain should he decide to run again. I will not be supporting Gingrich even if he becomes the nominee, I could never vote for him, I will either stay home or possibly vote 3rd party.

    Some will say to me now that voting 3rd party will only be throwing my vote away and be a win for Obama, well I have two things to say about that statement.

    # 1 : I only throw my vote away when I vote for someone I could never support, I will no longer vote for the lesser of two evils any longer, that is exactly why this country is in trouble today, we must stop voting this way and make a stand. Also, when you vote for the lesser of two evils what you get in the end is still EVIL! I will no longer vote for evil EVER!

    # 2 : Gingrich will be worse than Obama, keep in mind that everything Obama is doing now Gingrich supported all the way up until he decided to run for President, so yes, he will be worse than Obama.

    This is a very sad day for me and many others on this forum. I would appreciate any comments all of you have on my opinion here.

    Vote Ron Paul 2012

    Mike Frank
    Senior Admin
    http://www.hermancainforums.com

  241. da verg | January 31, 2012 at 9:03 am |

    BOY are you misinformed…..which MEDIA WHORE told you that??

    >>>>the PEOPLE of iowa, Florida, South Carolina and New Hampshire. Four states, Paul got ZERO delegates, ZERO NONE NADA, fourth and fifth place finishes. Ron Paul has no chance, even if he goes third party, obama beats him hands down.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    As I said before…..you are VERY misinformed…….Dr. Paul will have at least as many delegates as the next guy…..most likely more…..and it is funny that you think you know the delegate situation when they haven’t even been divided up yet…..like I said…..which MEDIA whore are you listening to???

  242. Judge Nap-Sarah Palin Stays On The Titanic(Video)

    Is anyone surprised? Listen to her new speak. Leave it to the Judge to try and squeeze some logic out of her.

    http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/1424174736001/

  243. which MEDIA whore are you listening to???

    >>>>the PEOPLE who voted told me and you are misinformed. Per law , as it stands today PAUL has ZERO delegates from IOWA (Santorem has them all as of today), New Hampshire (ROMNEY has them, PAUL GOT ZERO), South Carolina (Gringrich has them all), Florida – Paul is not even campaigning there (either Gringrich or Romney get them). To date PAUL has ZERO Republican delegates. He finishied 4th or fifth in every state to date, across a wide selection of America. The truth hurts doesn’t it ?
    Paul has no chance, none at all. Even if romney or Gringrich drops out, he still has to leap frog over Santorem. Your best bet is to jump on Santorem bad wagon, at least he won a state. Paul is a loser .

  244. DaVerg | January 31, 2012 at 11:54 am |

    which MEDIA whore are you listening to???

    >>>>the PEOPLE who voted told me and you are misinformed. Per law , as it stands today PAUL has ZERO delegates from IOWA (Santorem has them all as of today), New Hampshire (ROMNEY has them, PAUL GOT ZERO), South Carolina (Gringrich has them all), Florida – Paul is not even campaigning there (either Gringrich or Romney get them). To date PAUL has ZERO Republican delegates. He finishied 4th or fifth in every state to date, across a wide selection of America. The truth hurts doesn’t it ?
    Paul has no chance, none at all. Even if romney or Gringrich drops out, he still has to leap frog over Santorem. Your best bet is to jump on Santorem bad wagon, at least he won a state. Paul is a loser .

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    The people that told you this are very misinformed then and you would do well to STOP spreading the LIES…….He was 3rd in Iowa…….2nd in NH and 4rh in SC…..only states so far that I know of…..He has more delegates than you know and that just eats you up…….YOU had better stop attacking the ONLY person who has a snowball’s chance in HECK to beat BO…..reality is sometimes hard for you PARTY people to see!!! We are NOT putting electing the LESSER of TWO evils again!

  245. January 31, 2012
    summary of delegates voting for Ron Paul

    ZERO

    deal with it

  246. Interested Bystander

    da verg,

    ZERO is an awfully low number when every site I find states Paul has between 3 and 8 delegates.

    I’ll link a site that states Paul has 4 delegates:

    http://conservativebyte.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/image.png

    So you are MISinformed.

  247. There seems to be a lot of confusion about Minor. The NBC definition was given for two reasons: A) to satisfy the meaning of the term in Article II of the Constition and B) because this definition rejected Virginia Minor’s claim of being a citizen due to the 14th amendment. The Court’s opinion (which was not a majority opinion, but a unanimous opinion) was that women who were born in the country to citizen parents did not need the 14th amendment to confer citizenship upon them:

    “There is no doubt that women may be citizens. They are persons, and by the fourteenth amendment “all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” are expressly declared to be “citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” But, in our opinion, it did not need this amendment to give them that position. Before its adoption the Constitution of the United States did not in terms prescribe who should be citizens of the United States or of the several States, yet there were necessarily such citizens without such provision. ”

    The court went on to define NBC with exclusive, self-limiting criteria. The court’s argument has no weight if the children of citizen parents are not exclusively characterized as natural-born. The court was very specific that the 14th amendment did not confer citizenship on Minor:

    ‘The fourteenth amendment did not affect the citizenship of women any more than it did of men. In this particular, therefore, the rights of Mrs. Minor do not depend upon the amendment. She has always been a citizen from her birth, and entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizenship. The amendment prohibited the State, of which she is a citizen, from abridging any of her privileges and immunities as a citizen of the United States; but it did not confer citizenship on her. ”

    The syllabus in Minor confirms that citizen parents distinguish citizenship for women, BOTH prior to and SINCE the adoption of the 14th amendment:

    “In that sense, women, of born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction of the United States, have always been considered citizens of the United States, as much so before the adoption of the fourteenth amendment to the Constitution as since.”

    The Minor holding and its definition of NBC were quoted and affirmed in U.S. v Wong Kim Ark which said:

    “In Minor v. Happersett, Chief Justice Waite, when construing, in behalf of the court, the very provision of the Fourteenth Amendment now in question, said: “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens.””

    The 14th amendment is part of the constitution, so the court is saying that upon reviewing the 14th amendment, it does NOT define natural-born citizenship. It says resort must be had elsewhere and that elsewhere is a verbatim match of the law of nations.

    Justice Gray reiterates the holding in Minor further down, saying the Supreme Court was:

    “committed to the view that all children born in the United States of citizens or subjects of foreign States were excluded from the operation of the first sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment ”

    Gray said this was “manifest” or made clear by the unanimous Minor decision. He then quotes the NBC definition verbatim and follows with the holding:

    “Minor v. Happersett (1874), 21 Wall. 162, 166-168. The decision in that case was that a woman born of citizen parents within the United States was a citizen of the United States, …”

    This is the last point in the decision where Gray uses the term natural-born citizens. He continues another 25 pages building a case for saying the 14th amendment was declaratory of English common law, predicated upon a criteria of permanent residence and domicil to satisfy the subject clause. In effect, he has set up two definitions that both excluded Obama from U.S. citizenship … but that’s IF and only IF he can legally prove he was born in the United States. If Obama is a U.S. citizen, it’s by virture of statutory law in the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 … generally through collective naturalization.

    Now, if you don’t follow the point, ask yourself why TWO courts would rely on a definition that is dependent on having citizen parents if there was a general concensus that persons can be considered natural-born citiznes by virtue of jus soli alone. Why emphasize citizen parents??

  248. Well, Orly Taitz got the OK from Judge Malihi to go to superior court and ask them to ask the Hawaii court to play along. Let’s see how that goes. I will have my fingers and toes crossed. And or course, I will be praying.

    Up in Washington DC we have Montgomery Blair Sibley working through the courts with charges of wire fraud, no less. Here is his case.

    http://montgomeryblairsibley.com/library/ComplaintFirstAmendedfiled.pdf

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s