Judge Michael Malihi ruling, Indiana Appeals court lies, US Constitution Vs English common law, Supreme court opinions, More Indiana corruption?

Judge Michael Malihi ruling, Indiana Appeals court lies, US Constitution Vs English common law, Supreme court opinions, More Indiana corruption?

“If in the opinion of the People, the distribution or modification of the Constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation, for through this in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed.”…George Washington

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

Indiana has been in the news recently for political corruption.

From Fox News October 18, 2011.

“Shocking election fraud allegations have stained a state’s 2008
presidential primary – and it took a college student to uncover them.

“This fraud was obvious, far-reaching and appeared to be systemic,”
22-year-old Ryan Nees told Fox News, referring to evidence he
uncovered while researching electoral petitions from the 2008
Democratic Party primary in Indiana.

Nees’ investigation centered on the petitions that put then-senators
Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton on the ballot. As many as 150 of the
names and signatures, it is alleged, were faked. So many, in fact,
that the numbers raise questions about whether Obama’s campaign had
enough legitimate signatures to qualify for a spot on the ballot.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/10/18/college-student-credited-with-uncovering-possible-election-fraud-in-indianas
Who wrote the Indiana Appeals Court decision that Judge Michael Malihi of Georgia quoted? The Obama camp? Mainstream media?

Did a judge actually write this?
STEVE ANKENY AND BILL KRUSE, Appellants-Plaintiffs,

vs.

GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, Appellee-Respondent.

November 12, 2009
OPINION – FOR PUBLICATION
BROWN, Judge

CRONE, J., and MAY, J., concur.
“B. Natural Born Citizen

Second, the Plaintiffs argue that both President Barack Obama and Senator John McCain are not “natural born Citizens” as required for qualification to be
President under Article II, Section 1, Clause 49 of the U.S. Constitution”

“As to President Obama‟s status, the most common argument has been waged by members of the so-called “birther” movement who suggest that the President was not born in the United States”

Did a judge actually write the above? If so it is at best unprofessional and inaccurate and at worst biased.

“Specifically, the crux of the Plaintiffs‟ argument is that “[c]ontrary to the thinking of most People on the subject, there‟s a very clear distinction
between a „citizen of the United States‟ and a „natural born Citizen,‟ and the difference involves having [two] parents of U.S. citizenship, owing no foreign
allegiance. Appellants‟ Brief at 23. With regard to President Barack Obama, the Plaintiffs posit that because his father was a citizen of the United Kingdom,
President Obama is constitutionally ineligible to assume the Office of the President.”

Once again, did a judge write the above? First, there is a clear distinction between citizen and natural born citizen. Secondly, the judge cannot possibly know what most people think. Thirdly, the law is not based on what a group of people think.

“It thus clearly appears that by the law of England for the last three centuries, beginning before the settlement of this country, and continuing to the
present day, aliens, while residing in the dominions possessed by the crown of England, were within the allegiance, the obedience, the faith or loyalty, the
protection, the power, and the jurisdiction of the English sovereign; and therefore every child born in England of alien parents was a natural-born subject, unless the child of an ambassador or other diplomatic agent of a foreign state, or of an alien enemy in hostile occupation of the place where the child was
born.

III. The same rule was in force in all the English colonies upon this continent down to the time of the Declaration of Independence, and in the United States
afterwards, and continued to prevail under the constitution as originally established.”

The following

“and in the United States afterwards, and continued to prevail under the constitution as originally established.”

is a damn lie!

Anyone who has studied law and or history, anyone who has followed the natural born citizen debate, knows that although American Law was influenced by British Common Law, once we broke from the British Empire, we developed our own set of laws that are not identical to those of our ancestral lands.

For example:

US Constitution

Article I Section 2

“No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

Third Congress,  1795 .

“…children of citizens  of the United States…shall be considered citizens of the United States; Provided That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons, whose fathers have never been resident in the United States…”

Further evidence can be found here:

Citizen Wells January 6, 2011.

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2011/01/06/112th-congress-ron-paul-et-al-do-your-damn-job-us-constitution-natural-born-citizen-obama-eligibility/

From Sam Sewell of The Steady Drip.

“The Venus, 12 U.S. 8 Cranch 253 253 (1814)

The first was decided in A.D. 1814, at the beginning of the republic, by men who were intimately associated with the American Revolution.”

Being witnesses and heirs of the Revolution, they understood what the Framers of the Constitution had intended.

The Venus case regarded the question whether the cargo of a merchantman, named the Venus, belonging to an American citizen, and being shipped from British territory to America during the War of 1812, could be seized and taken as a prize by an American privateer.  But what the case said about citizenship, is what matters here.

WHAT THE VENUS CASE SAYS ON CITIZENSHIP

In the Venus Case, Justice Livingston, who wrote the unanimous decision, quoted the entire §212nd paragraph from the French edition, using his own English, on p. 12 of the ruling:

Vattel, who, though not very full to this point, is more explicit and more satisfactory on it than any other whose work has fallen into my hands, says:

“The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives or indigenes are those born in the country of parents who are citizens. Society not being able to subsist and to perpetuate itself but by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.

“The inhabitants, as distinguished from citizens, are strangers who are permitted to settle and stay in the country. Bound by their residence to the society, they are subject to the laws of the state while they reside there, and they are obliged to defend it…”

From attorneys and legal scholars:

From Attorney Mario Apuzzo February 3, 2012.

“Georgia State Administrative Law Judge, Michael M. Malihi, issued his decision on Friday, February 3, 2012, finding that putative President, Barack Obama, is eligible as a candidate for the presidential primary election under O.C.G.A. Sec. 21-2-5(b). The decision can be read here, http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/02/judge-malihi-rules-against-plaintiffs.html

I must enter my objection to this decision which is not supported by either fact or law.

The Court held: “For purposes of this analysis, this Court considered that President Barack Obama was born in the United States. Therefore, as discussed in Arkeny [sic meant Ankeny], he became a citizen at birth and is a natural born citizen.”

But there is no evidence before the Court that Obama was born in the United States. The court can only rest its finding of fact on evidence that is part of the court record. The judge tells us that he decided the merits of the plaintiffs’ claims. But he does not tell us in his decision what evidence he relied upon to “consider[]” that Obama was born in the United States. The judge “considered” that Obama was born in the United States. What does “considered” mean? Clearly, it is not enough for a court to consider evidence or law. It must make a finding after having considered facts and law. The judge simply does not commit to any finding as to where Obama was born. Using the word “considered” is a cop out from actually addressing the issue. Additionally, we know from his decision that neither Obama nor his attorney appeared at the hearing let alone introduced any evidence of Obama’s place of birth. We also know from the decision that the judge ruled that plaintiffs’ documents introduced into evidence were “of little, if any, probative value, and thus wholly insufficient to support Plaintiff’s allegations.” Surely, the court did not use those “insufficient” documents as evidence of Obama’s place of birth. Nor does the judge tell us that he used those documents for any such purpose. The judge also does not tell us that the court took any judicial notice of any evidence (not to imply that it could). The judge did find that Obama has been certified by the state executive committee of a political party. But with the rules of evidence of superior court applying, this finding does not establish anyone’s place of birth. Hence, what evidence did the judge have to rule that Obama is born in the United States? The answer is none.

The court did not engage in its own thoughtful and reasoned analysis of the meaning of an Article II “natural born Citizen,” but rather relied only upon Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana, 916 N.E.2d 678 (Ind. Ct.App. 2009), transfer denied, 929 N.E.2d 789 (2010), a state-court decision which erred in how it defined a “natural born Citizen.””

Read more:

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/02/all-that-is-wrong-with-georgia-state.html

From Attorney Leo Donofrio February 4, 2012.

“There is no “clearly expressed intention” to deem 14th Amendment citizens “natural born”. Those words were intentionally left out of the 14th Amendment. And Judge Malihi has simply overruled the U.S. Supreme Court by suggesting that the general citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment governs the specific requirement to be President in Article 2, Section 1.

Both clauses are not given separate effect by Malihi. His opinion holds that the 14th has the exact same effect as the natural-born citizen clause, while the 14th Amendment does not include the words “natural born Citizen”. Persons claiming citizenship under the 14th Amendment are deemed to be “citizens”. Malihi has added the words “natural born” into the Amendment. This is absolutely forbidden, according to Malihi’s own opinion in the Motion to dismiss, wherein he held:

“In the absence of words of limitation, words in a statute should be given their ordinary and everyday meaning.’ Six Flags Over Ga. v. Kull, 276 Ga. 210, 211 (2003) (citations and quotation marks omitted). Because there is no other ‘natural and reasonable construction’ of the statutory language, this Court is ‘not authorized either to read into or to read out that which would add to or change its meaning.’ ””

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2012/02/04/a-rat-called-tandem/

I recommend to the Georgia Secretary of State to have the Attorney General of GA read the Malihi ruling and that Judge Malihi be drug tested.

About these ads

91 responses to “Judge Michael Malihi ruling, Indiana Appeals court lies, US Constitution Vs English common law, Supreme court opinions, More Indiana corruption?

  1. What America should know

    The so called GA Judge Michael M. Malihi is an IRANIAN MUSLIM brother
    and when a blogger tried to find out exactly who this fraud judge really is – guess what – just like usurper obama – no records..birds of a feather do flock TOGETHER.

    just type in: Is Judge Michael M. Malihi an Iranian Muslim? he is connected to 5 muslim family members too – how interesting….so now we know exactly why this FRAUD judge just helped usurper FRAUD boy..

    Michael’s real name is Molihi & he has lived in approx. 5 different areas in the USA….Americans noticed something with muslims – they use several different names with several different spellings & they make these changes to HIDE the TRUTH so nobody can BUST their stinky asses….

    Molihi – Malihi just screwed up big time

    http://intangiblesoul.wordpress.com/2012/02/04/who-is-judge-michael-malihi/

  2. Everyone should review this private,mostly anti-American,Marxist,private army of Obama. I wonder how much they get paid for their incompetence. None of them were approved by Congress.

    OBAMA’S CZARS

    There are very few of us who know just what all of Obama’s Czars do, as they quietly go about their “work” in the nation’s capital. This listing of their names and job descriptions should be educational to all Americans, no matter what your political leaning. See who they are and realize what they want to do:

    Richard Holbrooke – Afghanistan Czar Ultra liberal anti-gun former Governor Of New Mexico. Pro-Abortion and pro- drug legalization. Wants to dissolve the 2nd Amendment

    Ed Montgomery – Auto recovery Czar Radical anti-business black activist. Affirmative Action and Job Preference for blacks. University of Maryland Business School Dean; teaches that US business has caused world poverty. ACORN board member. Communist DuBois Club member.

    Jeffrey Crowley – AIDS Czar Radical Homosexual. Gay Rights activist. Believes in Gay Marriage and a Special Status for homosexuals only, including complete free health care for gays.

    Alan Bersin – Border Czar The former failed superintendent of San Diego. Ultra-Liberal friend of Hillary Clinton. Served as Border Czar under Janet Reno – to keep borders open to illegals without interference from the Federal government.

    David J. Hayes – California Water Czar Senior Fellow of radical environmentalist group “Progress Policy”. No training or experience in water management whatsoever.

    Ron Bloom – Car Czar Auto Union worker. Anti- business & anti- nuclear. Has worked hard to force US auto makers out of business. Sits on the Board of Chrysler which is now Union-owned. How did this happen?

    Dennis Ross – Central Region Czar Believes US policy is the cause of war in the Middle East. Obama apologist to the world. Anti-gun and completely Pro-Abortion.

    Lynn Rosenthal – Domestic Violence Czar Director of the National Network to End Domestic Violence. Vicious anti-male feminist. Supports male castration – imagine?

    Gil Kerlikowske – Drug Czar Devoted lobbyist for every restrictive gun law proposal, former Chief of Police in liberal Seattle WA. Believes no American should own a firearm. Supports legalization of all drugs.

    Paul Volcker – Economic Czar Former head of the Federal Reserve under Jimmy Carter when US economy nearly failed. Obama-appointed head of the Economic Recovery Advisory Board which engineered the Obama economic disaster to US economy. Member of anti-business “Progressive Policy” organization,

    Carol Browner – Energy and Environment Czar Political Radical. Former head of the EPA – known for anti-business activism. Strong anti-gun ownership.

    Joshua DuBois – Faith-Based Czar Political Black activist. Degree in Black Nationalism. Anti-gun ownership lobbyist.WHAT THE HELL DOES A FAITH BASED CZAR DO ? ? ?

    Cameron Davis – Great Lakes Czar Chicago radical anti-business environmentalist. Blames George Bush for “Poisoning the water that minorities have to drink.” No experience or training in water management whatsoever. Former ACORN Board member (what does that tell us?)

    Van Jones – Green Jobs Czar (since resigned). Black activist with strong anti-white views. Member of American Communist Party and San Francisco Communist Party. Said George Bush caused the 9-11 attacks and wanted Bush investigated by the World Court for war crimes.

    Daniel Fried – Guantanamo Closure Czar Human Rights activist for Foreign Terrorists. Believes America has caused the Global War on Terrorism. Believes terrorists have rights above and beyond Americans.

    Nancy-Ann DeParle – Health Czar Former head of Medicare / Medicaid. Strong proponent of Healthcare Rationing (i.e. “Death Panels”). She is married to a reporter for The New York Times.

    Vivek Kundra – Information Czar Born in New Delhi, India. Controls all public information, including labels and news releases. Monitors all private Internet emails. (HELLO?)

    Todd Stern – International Climate Czar Anti-business former White House Chief of Staff. Strong supporter of the Kyoto Accord; pushing hard for Cap and Trade. Blames US business for Global warming. Anti- US business prosperity.

    Dennis Blair – Intelligence Czar Retired US Navy. Stopped US guided missile program he described as “provocative”. Chair of ultra-Liberal “Council on Foreign Relations” which blames American organizations for regional wars.

    George Mitchell – Mideast Peace Czar Fmr. Sen from Maine Left wing radical. Has said Israel should be split up into “2 or 3 ” smaller more manageable plots”. (God forbid) A true Anti-nuclear anti-gun & pro homosexual “special rights” advocate

    Kenneth Feinberg – Pay Czar Chief of Staff to Ted Kennedy. Lawyer who got rich off the 9-11 victims payoffs (horribly true).

    Cass Sunstein – Regulatory Czar Liberal activist judge who believes free speech needs to be limited for the “common good”; essentially against the 1st Amendment. Has ruled against personal freedoms many times on private gun ownership and right to free speech cases. This guy has to be run out of Washington ! ! !

    John Holdren – Science Czar Fierce ideological environmentalist, Sierra Club anti-business activist. Claims US business has caused world poverty. No Science training.

    Earl Devaney – Stimulus Accountability Czar Spent career trying to take guns away from American citizens. Believes in Open Borders to Mexico. Author of statement blaming US gun stores for drug war in Mexico .

    J. Scott Gration – Sudan Czar Native of Democratic Republic of Congo . Believes US does little to help Third World countries. Council of foreign relations, asking for higher US taxes to support United Nations

    Herb Allison – TARP Czar Fannie Mae CEO responsible for the US recession by using real estate mortgages to back up the US stock market. Caused millions of people to lose their life savings.

    John Brennan – Terrorism Czar Anti CIA activist. No training in diplomatic or gov. affairs. Believes Open Borders to Mexico and a dialog with terrorists and has suggested Obama disband US military A TOTAL MORON!!!!!

    Aneesh Chopra – Technology Czar No Technology training. Worked for the Advisory Board Company, a health care think tank for hospitals. Anti-doctor activist. Supports Obama Healthcare Rationing (i.e. Death Panels) and salaried doctors working exclusively for the Government Healthcare plan.

    Adolfo Carrion Jr. – Urban Affairs Czar Puerto Rico-born Anti-American activist and leftist group member in Latin America. Millionaire “slum lord” of Bronx, NY. Owns many lavish homes and condos which he got from “sweetheart” deals with labor unions. Wants higher taxes on middle class to pay for minority housing and healthcare.

    Ashton Carter – Weapons Czar Leftist. Wants all private weapons in US destroyed. Supports UN ban on firearms ownership in America. No Other “policy”.

    Gary Samore – WMD Policy Czar Former US Communist. Wants US to destroy all WMD unilaterally as a show of good faith. Has no other “policy”

    These are the people who are helping President Obama run our country.

  3. Bessie,
    I was hoping to have your information moved forward? Boehner let’s Holder slide? Filth at every level from both parties! And Boehner’s email doesn’t seem to work at this moment.

  4. What is obviously needed here is a petition for an Ex-Parte Declatory Judgement on what constitutes a “natural born” citizen leaving obama out of the equation AT THIS TIME. When a ruling issues, THEN apply it to obama. Since he is not a party to the action, it is HE that has “no standing” to interfere.

    14th Amendment created citizens are government created “subjects”, the “agent” in relation to government. The OEM model citizen, as the country’s founders, are government’s “principal”. There is nothing “American” about the 14th Amendment.

    Under the Law of Agency, only the “principal” has the authority to correct unlawful acts and usurpations of authority by the “agent”. The “subject” can only grovel at the feet of their king and ask for his permission to redress injuries caused by the king or his minions.

  5. frank | February 5, 2012 at 1:22 pm |
    *********************************
    frank, check out Senate Resolution 511, the US Senate nailed it and Obama signed it, saying it was so.

  6. Katie; My hope is that everyone takes notice and drowns Boehner with emails, fax’s, letters, and phone calls…pass it on.

  7. “The common law of England is not the common law of these States.” –George Mason

    It simply becomes beyond ridiculous when I continue to hear attorneys supporting Obama as well as his paid trolling minions intertwining the English Common law with that of the U.S. common law pertaining to natural born citizen. Lets consider history briefly.

    Under the old English common law doctrine of natural-born subject, birth itself was an act of naturalization that required no prior consent or demand of expressed allegiance to the nation in advance. Furthermore, birth was viewed as enjoining a “perpetual allegiance” upon all that could never be severed or altered by any change of time or act of anyone. England’s “perpetual allegiance” due from birth was extremely unpopular in this country; often referred to as absurd barbarism, or simply perpetual nonsense. America went to war with England over the doctrine behind “natural-born subject” in June of 1812.

    Because Britain considered all who were born within the dominions of the crown to be its natural-born subjects even after becoming naturalized citizens of the United States, led to British vessels blockading American ports. Under the British blockade, every American ship entering or leaving was boarded by soldiers in search of British born subjects. At least 6,000 American citizens who were found to be British natural-born subjects were pressed into military service on behalf of the British Empire, and thus, the reason we went to war…

    Does one honestly think that after the war of 1812 over the English Doctrine of “natural-born-subject”, the United States in turn adopted the same common law English doctrine they just fought against? That’s just asinine.

  8. Every U.S. Representative is up for election this year. Tell your Rep that you are withholding contributions to their campaigns if Holder walks. Your money will be better spent on new candidates who better represent your views. This also applies to Senators who are running this year.

    http://www.contactingthecongress.org/

    http://www.congress.org/congressorg/directory/search_results.tt?action=alphasearch&show=chamber&alpha=W

  9. Senate Resolution 511

  10. lmuha | February 5, 2012 at 11:44 am |
    ==========================
    Interesting, thanks! I thought, after all that occurred in GA on the part of Obama and his atty; the insults to the court and SoS….there must be some kind of possible connection to excusing them without even a mention of contempt of court in this judgement. Well, they say there is a long term Muslim plan, beginning in various power bases on the state level before ascendency to POTUS eventually. Already we see our Christian faith’s rights being abused….special arrangements for “other religions” re: prayer at our institutions of edu. but forbidding any kind of group or otherwise prayer by Christians/groups. And now the freedom of religion being blatantly attacked in this Obamacare rip off to subsidize the culture of death. Meanwhile the lemmings happily follow the pied piper to their own demise.

  11. Bob,

    You are correct with the SR 511.

  12. observer | February 5, 2012 at 2:31 pm |

    lmuha | February 5, 2012 at 11:44 am |
    ==========================
    Interesting, thanks! I thought, after all that occurred in GA on the part of Obama and his atty; the insults to the court and SoS….there must be some kind of possible connection to excusing them without even a mention of contempt of court in this judgement. Well, they say there is a long term Muslim plan, beginning in various power bases on the state level before ascendency to POTUS eventually. Already we see our Christian faith’s rights being abused….special arrangements for “other religions” re: prayer at our institutions of edu. but forbidding any kind of group or otherwise prayer by Christians/groups. And now the freedom of religion being blatantly attacked in this Obamacare rip off to subsidize the culture of death. Meanwhile the lemmings happily follow the pied piper to their own demise.
    *********************************
    Muslim Brotherhood?

  13. 110th CONGRESS
    2d Session
    S. RES. 511

    Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.

    IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
    April 10, 2008

    Mrs. MCCASKILL (for herself, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. OBAMA, Mr. COBURN, Mrs. CLINTON, and Mr. WEBB) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

    April 24, 2008

    Reported by Mr. LEAHY, without amendment

    April 30, 2008

    Considered and agreed to

    RESOLUTION

    Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.

    Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a `natural born Citizen’ of the United States;

    Whereas the term `natural born Citizen’, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;

    Whereas there is no evidence of the intention of the Framers or any Congress to limit the constitutional rights of children born to Americans serving in the military nor to prevent those children from serving as their country’s President;

    Whereas such limitations would be inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the `natural born Citizen’ clause of the Constitution of the United States, as evidenced by the First Congress’s own statute defining the term `natural born Citizen’;

    Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and enhanced by the men and women who are assigned to serve our country outside of our national borders;

    Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President; and,

    Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen’ under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States

    Please note who sponsored this bill. Mr. Obama, Ms. Clinton, Mr.Leahy, Mr. Webb and Mr. Coburn.

    Also note that EVERY mention in this resolution refers to PARENTS…not the single.

    The final whereas stated that “Mr. John Sidney McCain III was born to PARENTS who were Americans…………”

    A third grade drop-out can recognize Mr. Obama, one of the sponsors of Mr. McCain’s Resolution 511, supposedly was born to a 18 year old girl , with a drunken AFRICAN father, is not, and can never be a “natural-born” citizen.

    Why wasn’t this entered into evidence on the 26th of Jan at that Iranian judge’s trial?

    I suppose this would have been irrelevant too.

  14. “pRESIDENT OBAMA AND THE BIBLE”

    By Michael Youssef
    February 5, 2012

    Excerpt:

    “Many of us who are biblical scholars have watched Mr. Obama’s use, or should I say abuse, of the Bible with dismay.”

    [...]

    “Understanding this, one has to wonder if Mr. Obama has replaced God with his administration. He must believe that when he says “much is given,” he refers to what is given by the government, and “much is demanded,” as that which is demanded by the government. This is 180° opposite to the truth.

    This is a very dangerous precedent. We have had egotistical presidents before, from both political spectrums, but never to my knowledge have we had one who saw himself as replacing God, or one who views his administration as acting on God’s behalf or instead of God.

    Misquoting the Scripture is a common practice by some politicians to advance their cause, but this abuse of the Scripture and viewing one’s administration as the judge and executioner, not for crimes, but for personal stewardship, has reached a new low in egotism.

    Mr. Obama needs to issue an immediate and urgent apology for his misuse and mangling of the Scripture.”

    See The Entire Article Here:

    http://townhall.com/columnists/michaelyoussef/2012/02/05/president_obama_and_the_bible

    * * * *

    “GOT RELIGION? OBAMA JUSTIFIES POLICIES BY MISAPPLYING CHRISTIANITY”

    By Kate Hicks
    February 2, 2012

    http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katehicks/2012/02/02/got_religion_obama_justifies_policies_using_jesus

    * * * *

    “GOP CONSIDERING CONTEMPT CHARGES AGAINST WHITE HOUSE OVER SOLYNDRA SUBPOENA”

    By Erika Johnsen
    January 31, 2012

    http://townhall.com/tipsheet/erikajohnsen/2012/01/31/gop_considering_contempt_charges_against_white_house_over_solyndra_subpoena

  15. “CLASS ACT IS DEAD, BUT OBAMA WON’T APPEAL IT”

    By Debra J. Saunders
    February 5, 2012

    Excerpt:

    “It says something about the brazen attitude of American politicians that Congress enacted a measure to create a program that was impossible to implement — and named it the CLASS Act. CLASS stands for Community Living Assistance Services and Support, a program that was supposed to offer voluntary long-term care insurance to workers who are 18 or older; its initials are about the only classy angle to the scheme.
    Last February, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius told the Senate that the CLASS Act, as written, was “totally unsustainable.” In October, Sebelius announced that she could not implement the act and suspended the program. Even with the help of the best experts, her department could not design an actuarially sound and financially solvent plan.

    Problem: Even though Sebelius said that the plan is unworkable, President Barack Obama doesn’t support repealing the law.

    On Wednesday, the House voted 267-159 — 28 Democrats joined all 239 Republicans — to pull the plug on the program. But the White House and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid do not want to repeal the CLASS Act. They apparently think they can score political points by hanging on to a comatose program.”

    See The Entire Article Here:

    http://townhall.com/columnists/debrajsaunders/2012/02/05/class_act_is_dead_but_obama_wont_repeal_it/page/full/

  16. Michael “Maliq” Malihi
    and his family
    Mehdi Malihi
    Masoud M Malihi
    Malie S Malihi
    Mahzad Malihi
    Lia E Malihi

  17. Rob | February 5, 2012 at 4:13 pm |

    Who is Judge Michael #Malihi?

    http://intangiblesoul.wordpress.com/2012/02/04/who-is-judge-michael-malihi/
    **************************************
    Jihad?

  18. “FAST AND FURIOUS: HOLDER SAYS NO ATTEMPT OF A COVERUP AT DOJ”

    Katie Pavlich
    News Editor, Townhall
    February 2, 2012

    Excerpt:

    “Capitol Hill — After thirteen months of investigation into the Obama Justice Department’s lethal Operation Fast and Furious and Attorney General Eric Holder’s sixth time answering questions from Congress on the topic, we are stuck with stonewalling, non-answers and more calls for gun control.

    “This committee has lost its patience to wait longer,” Chairman of the House Oversight Committee Darrell Issa said.”

    http://townhall.com/columnists/katiepavlich/2012/02/02/fast_and_furious_holder_says_no_attempt_of_a_coverup_at_doj/page/full/

    * * * *

    “DEMS TO OBAMA: YEAH, YOU SHOULD PROBABLY JUST QUIT”

    Katie Pavlich
    November 21, 2011

    http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2011/11/21/dems_to_obama_yeah,_you_should_probably_just_quit

    * * * *

    “OBAMA, THREE YEARS AGO THIS WEEK: “IF I DON’T HAVE THIS TURNED AROUND IN THREE YEARS…”

    By Timothy H. Lee
    Thursday, February 2, 2012

    Excerpt:

    “Third, and most important, Obama’s policies have had the effect of exacerbating our economic malaise rather than curing it. As stated by Mike Solon and former Senator Phil Gramm this week, “Never before in postwar America has either real per capita GDP or employment still been lower four years after a recession began.” That fact speaks for itself.

    In the face of these realities, Obama will rationalize his failure by scapegoating everyone but himself, despite the fact that a Congress controlled by his own party enacted his agenda from day one of his tenure. He can’t marshal the facts in his defense, so he will instead marshal speculation and excuse.

    Three years on, he has spent a lot of other people’s money and made big government even bigger. But by his own performance metric, Obama has failed.”

    See The Entire Article Here:

    http://cfif.org/v/index.php/commentary/43-taxes-and-economy/1295-obama-three-years-ago-this-week-if-i-dont-have-this-turned-around-in-three-years

  19. If you want to know a little more about Indiana CORRUPTION her is a LITTLE MORSEL for you to chew on………Our Republican SOS was taken to court for not living in the proper district. The last I knew regarding Indiana Law he has the right to LIVE anywhere in the state he chooses to live. Yet he was found guilty by a LIBERAL KANGAROO court,and ejected from the office. The SLIME LIBERALS LOST NO TIME IN INSTALLING THEIR OWN DIRTY LITTLE PUPPET. His surname is “Osili”. Great fodder for a little verbal fun……Right away I thought of the expression “OH silly.” If he is half as SILLY as his surname seems to imply then his parents must have been totally ……..WHACKY! Just what our state needs is a SILLY SOS.

  20. For an Indiana SOS to have a surname like Osili is about the same thing as Fort Wayne once having a mayor whose surname was BAALS. His given name was Harry. His full name was Harry W. Baals. (pronounced)BALLS. OHHHH WEEELL.

  21. http://conservativedailynews.com/2012/02/freedom-of-religion-not-according-to-the-obama-administration/

    Excommunication seems appropriate for any Catholic, such as Secretary Sebelius, who refuses to renounce this edict regarding mandatory contracepton and abortion.

  22. oldsalt79 | February 5, 2012 at 5:12 pm |

    If you want to know a little more about Indiana CORRUPTION her is a LITTLE MORSEL for you to chew on………Our Republican SOS was taken to court for not living in the proper district. The last I knew regarding Indiana Law he has the right to LIVE anywhere in the state he chooses to live. Yet he was found guilty by a LIBERAL KANGAROO court,and ejected from the office. The SLIME LIBERALS LOST NO TIME IN INSTALLING THEIR OWN DIRTY LITTLE PUPPET. His surname is “Osili”. Great fodder for a little verbal fun……Right away I thought of the expression “OH silly.” If he is half as SILLY as his surname seems to imply then his parents must have been totally ……..WHACKY! Just what our state needs is a SILLY SOS.
    ************************************
    Putting their Soros puppets in place, getting ready to steal the 2012 election.

    Gotta have the right SOS in place to ignore all of the illegal voting.

  23. ‘Why Start a War? You Know?’
    Paul on a nuclear Iran: ‘You don’t go to war over these kinds of things’ [VIDEO]

    Read more: http://dailycaller.com/#ixzz1lY8JZQra

    Ho hum! How those nasty little realities of promised annihilation of a nation just keep butting in to our little paradise here on earth!

  24. “ANNOUNCEMENT: Commander Kerchner Leads Pennsylvania Ballot Challenge”

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/02/commander-charles-kerchner-leads.html

  25. Just for the heck of it, here is an article on the type of people Iran wants to wipe out. What have the Arabs or Iranians or Turks invented lately that is used all over the world?

    http://pjmedia.com/blog/apple-branches-out-to-high-tech-israel/2/

  26. Newt makes the points again…without pulling any punches. Don’t be nice to the MSM Obama talking points:

    Newt Hammers NBC News’ Gregory For Parroting Obama Talking Points

    http://www.breitbart.tv/newt-hammers-nbc-news-gregory-for-parroting-obama-talking-points/

  27. Iran wants to start World War III. Why doesn’t that bother some people?

  28. observer | February 5, 2012 at 5:41 pm |

    ‘Why Start a War? You Know?’
    Paul on a nuclear Iran: ‘You don’t go to war over these kinds of things

    Read more: http://dailycaller.com/#ixzz1lY8JZQra

    Ho hum! How those nasty little realities of promised annihilation of a nation just keep butting in to our little paradise here on earth!
    _______________________

    Discouraging Israel from attacking Iran is nothing. Israel, no doubt will act in their own best interest. They have yet to give in to PC thank God!

  29. Imuha…………………..
    Do you believe that there is a Valery Jarrett connection here? After all she was born in IRAN,and in all probability SYMPATHASIZES with the IRANIANS. There seems to be a Chicago STENCH coming from Georgia.

  30. OPEN LETTER TO
    GEORGIA SECRETARY OF STATE

    http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/

    THE HONORABLE MR. BRIAN KEMP

    To: Secretary of State, Mr. Brian Kemp
    Date: February 5, 2012
    Re: Eligibility Ruling of Feb/4/2012 (Judge Malihi)

    Dear Brian Kemp,
    I am writing this letter to you not as an attorney, a Democrat or Republican, but as a citizen that has become very concerned with the direction this country has taken over the span of my lifetime.

    As of this date you have no doubt been contacted by many people from both sides of this issue, many with the law degrees or years of political activism, all of whom can better address the legal issues and social consequences, much better than this retired contractor. So I want to address this issue with you on the field of personal foreboding that I just can’t shake.

    It has been and remains to this day, my belief, that what has made this country the greatest place to live, in all of recorded history, is that wonderful and brilliant document, authored by intellectual and God loving geniuses, the United States Constitution. It is true that our country is made up of many cultures and many religions whose people left their homes in far away lands to come here and have contributed mightily to what we are.

    As the US Constitution allowed for every citizen to pursue success, happiness and fortune, to the best of each one’s ability and desire, because of the promise that the rule of law, as opposed to the rule of man, would protect their rights and their property, so too did it draw to this country, the best the world had to offer. This is what America is and America is the US Constitution.

    Clearly the Constitution has been under attack from the left and from the right for many years now. This past week, as Judge Malihi’s obviously political ruling settled over this nation like a dark onerous cloud, one could not help but think the enemies of our democratic republic are winning in their struggle to destroy the freedoms we have for so long enjoyed.

    Whether it be in sports, business or legal contracts, if any rule is allowed to be ignored or misused, for any purpose, the system will break down. Mr. Kemp, so many of us out here, fear for our children and theirs as we see, time after time, this system breaking down.

    Just a few words on the ruling this past week. Not being an attorney, but having developed a sense of what is fair and what is not, when we watched as the defendant in the case, not only refused to provide evidence, in accordance with the court order and the election laws of Georgia, but also refused to even participate, that sense of “rule of man” descended on us like hammer and, shall I suggest, sickle? There appears to have been no “peril”, except to our freedom.

    As you review this ruling there are a few things I know you are aware of and hopefully you will consider.

    1. Why did the Judge make a ruling on “credibility” of the witnesses without either cross examination or appointing an expert to review the charges and testimony?

    2. Why did the Judge reach out to a lower court ruling, where clearly the few people involved in that case had no clue about Article II, and ignore case after case from our own United States Supreme Court? Could it be because he was operating on an agenda as opposed to the law?

    3. If the Judge was going to allow the defendant not attend or testify under oath and thereby made his ruling based upon the “defense” he provided for the defendant, why were the plaintiffs not given the opportunity to cross examine the Judge before he made his ruling?

    4. Since Judge Malihi was performing as the defendant’s advocate, should he not have been put under oath and questioned as to why he refused to have other experts verify that the birth certificate is a forgery and that Obama’s SSN failed E-Verify instead of simply dismissing the testimony?

    5. If Judge Malihi was going to allow the defendant not to participate, should he have cross examined the plaintiff’s witnesses as to why he thought they were not credible? Or is it possible, that line of questioning would serve no purpose to the preconceived outcome?

    6. Could it really be possible that the brilliance of our founding fathers faltered when they wrote the special qualifications for the President and Vice-President in regards to the “Natural Born Citizen” clause? Or would anyone with a modicum of sense believe they thought the foreign affiliation protection they sought would be accomplished by only one parent being a citizen? If we were to take that as possible we would have to believe, that in their time, Thomas Jefferson and John Jay would have no problem with the King of England being the father of the next President.

    If any Judge or any politician, can pick and chose, for ideological reasons or convenience, which part of the Constitution they will adhere to, there will be no future for this country. The founding fathers gave us a way to alter the Constitution for parts that may have become obsolete or not practicable. That of course is the Amendment process, which, by the way, does not include ruling from the bench by some idealistic jurist.

    Mr. Kemp, I know it would take a great act of courage for you to not just accept this very unfortunate ruling by one of your judges. This case will be destined to go down in history as the most one sided ruling in the favor of a defendant that didn’t even provide a defense.

    While it would be much easier on you personally, as well as the short time comfort of your department, to just agree with Judge Malihi and allow an ineligible candidate on your ballot, the long term effect on the slow degradation of the rule of law will be moved forward in a new giant step.

    What is it that I and millions of Americans across this country would like the Honorable Brian Kemp do? Simple. Before you accept or reject the ruling of the Judge in this case, we would like you to perform a review of the following points.

    1. Why Judge Malihi did not ask for verification on the forged birth certificate and mal-use of Social Security numbers.
    2. Why did he select a lower court’s clearly mis-evaluated ruling in stead of being guided by decisions form the United States Supreme Court?
    3. Why were the plaintiffs not given the opportunity to cross examine the Judge on the defense he donated to the defendant?
    4. Has there been any contact between the defendant and Judge Malihi that has not been made part of the court record?

    If these issues are addressed and reasonable answers obtained, consistent with the concept of law, then any decision you make will at least be done after a full accounting. No one can ask for more than that.

    Sincerely,
    Dwight Kehoe
    Little Silver, NJ
    http://www.tpath.org

    February 5, 2012 TPATH

  31. I’m in moderation at 6:31. Help, CW, please. Thanks.

  32. One thing is certain ….if or when Israel decides to attack IRAN,they will have first identified ALL of their enemy’s weak spots and they will have spent a great deal of time and money practicing how to inflict the greatest level of pain upon the Iranian MADMAN,via the weak spots. Such was the case when Moshe Dayan beat the hell out of THREE enemies at once. The Israelis don’t FORGET………..they LEARN. Being the size of a country they are makes it imperative that they act swiftly and DECISIVELY in any action against an enemy. I personally believe that if they no longer have any options they WILL attack IRAN, and ….WIN. It will be the same sort of rout that Stormin Norman carried out against the IRAQI BADASS in DESERT STORM. When you let the air out of a balloon it shrinks to about 1% of it’s inflated size, and becomes limp and useless. Similarly you can GOOSESTEP, and you can hurl INVECTIVES. But can you really sustain a PROLONGED outright war, with an enemy who has ALREADY taken out 2/3 rds of your best trained troops. The answer is NO. IRANIAN’S BLUSTER will NOT win wars, nor does GOOSESTEPPING win wars. The Iranians have yet to learn this …..the HARD WAY.

  33. If Obama has no Natural Born Citizenship problem why did Congress try to fix it? Coach Collins, on February 5th, 2012

    Suzanne Eovaldi, staff writer
    Congress made eight different attempts to alter our U.S. Constitution concerning the Natural Born Citizenship Clause according to the apocalyptic video documentary done with research by Senior Pastor Carl Gallups proving they knew Barack Obama lacked presidential eligibility prior to the 2008 election! If there was no problem for Obama why would these people do this? There had never been a question of Natural Born Citizenship in our lifetimes! Why fix what wasn’t broken?

    read more:
    http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/

  34. Observer…………….
    Once again you have “HIT THE NAIL SQUARELY ON THE HEAD”. My sympathies as well. Thanks for saying it so well.

  35. OBSERVER……………
    BTW, KEEP your powder DRY, and your weapons in top fighting condition. Nothing works better when you are COMPELLED to fight.

  36. oldsalt79 | February 5, 2012 at 6:11 pm | Imuha…………………..
    Do you believe that there is a Valery Jarrett connection here? After all she was born in IRAN,and in all probability SYMPATHASIZES with the IRANIANS. There seems to be a Chicago STENCH coming from Georgia.

    ==============================
    Now that’s an angle!

  37. Great thoughts, Old Salt.

  38. A Crazy Old Coot

    OldSalt, I always keep my guns and ammo oiled with bacon grease and make sure they shoot true!

  39. Bacon grease-old school.

  40. GORDO | February 5, 2012 at 5:54 pm |

    “ANNOUNCEMENT: Commander Kerchner Leads Pennsylvania Ballot Challenge”
    ***********************************************************************
    No law in PA requires the (party) candidate on the ballot to be qualified for the job.

  41. In comments at ORYR:

    “A quick look at Pennsylvania Election laws looks like all he can challenge are the signatures of the people who signed the nominating petition.

    http://co.armstrong.pa.us/departments/public-services/elections-votersregistration/running-for-public-office

    Doesn’t look like a candidate for President even has to say he is eligible.”

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/02/commander-charles-kerchner-leads.html?showComment=1328481818846#c4052641890989652106

  42. O’s Dad X’s 1961 Speech at Brown Univ to be released soon.
    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0212/72467_Page2.html

  43. This is pretty darn cool…..who says the elderly don’t support Dr. Paul…..awesome…..

    Maine: Paul supporters dominate Westbrook’s GOP caucus

    WESTBROOK – Eighty-six-year-old Fred Collins got to his feet Sunday afternoon and urged about 30 of his neighbors to support Rep. Ron Paul of Texas for president.

    “He’s the only one I’m hearing in Washington standing up for the Constitution,” Collins said…

    http://www.pressherald.com/news/paul-supporters-dominate-westbrooks-gop-caucus_2012-02-06.html

  44. Ron Paul is attracting crowds like Justin Bieber came to town and he is getting shafted on all the vote tallies. Iowa vote, null and void, so let’s give it to insane Santorum who has a really honest nephew that thinks his uncle Rick is a control freak and Islamophobe. Santorum came out of nowhere and was suddenly the “frontrunner.”

  45. In Massachusetts the State consolidated control and ownership of all counties in the state by merger of all counties into the State. This happened over a decade ago in Massachusetts. In addition to merger of the counties the “State” changed their government status from the “State” government of Massachusetts to the “Commonwealth” of Massachusetts. This transition was implemented by the “State” prior to 1995.

    The big point here is that: “Private Associations” were used over the last 75-years to transition local governments from what we use to know government as into “Corporate” for profit enterprises and did so by direct consult over the years.
    The structure of the “Commonwealth” of Massachusetts over the “State” government of Massachusetts, at the stroke of the pen overseen and checked off on by key player “Attorneys”, implemented the transition from a “government” entity into what could be more closely considered a “Private Association”.
    The implications here are grave specifically as would apply to the transfer and masking of public wealth. The People own government, they do not own private associations. Leave the liabilities under the “State” government shell and transfer the wealth holdings to and under the “Commonwealth” association.
    This was done right under the noses of the Massachusetts residents and done without a clue given that it was being done to the Peoples of Massachusetts. The same is covertly taking place in NJ, PA, CT, and many other states.
    The shell structure of government is being left in place as the wealth and stewardship responsibilities are transferred to the Private Association, or as in Massachusetts case when transitioned from the “State” government of Massachusetts into the “Commonwealth” of Massachusetts.
    When this transition took place about two decades ago, Massachusetts no longer produced a “State” government CAFR (Comprehensive Annual Financial Report). The CAFR was now produced under the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The State Court System and Financial operations were also transitioned into and under the same “Commonwealth” structure.

    Mitt Romney is the Presidential pick to be promoted by the syndicate being the prior governor of Massachusetts. He is versed on operating procedure to implement the same nationally. That will be his primary mission if elected President and thus the Syndicate is moving forward full steam utilizing all of their contacts and tactics to force Mitt Romney’s win as President.
    I note Barack Obama as an attorney and as current President is attempting to consolidate through restructuring federal government into the same transition.

  46. kim | February 6, 2012 at 1:25 am |
    In Massachusetts the State consolidated control and ownership of all counties in the state by merger of all counties into the State. This happened over a decade ago in Massachusetts. In addition to merger of the counties the “State” changed their government status from the “State” government of Massachusetts to the “Commonwealth” of Massachusetts. This transition was implemented by the “State” prior to 1995.
    ***************************
    Where are you getting all of this information from? What is your source?
    Do you have a link? Sounds like a little truth mixed with a lot of error and conspiracy stuff. Sorry, I’m not buying it.

  47. Constitutional Sheriff convention report:

    CRITICAL* – PLEASE FORWARD TO ALL AMERICANS

    Trip Report: Historic Constitutional Sheriffs Convention, Las Vegas, Jan. 30-31

    Something big and game-changing happened in Las Vegas last Monday and Tuesday and it was far too good to just let it ‘stay in Vegas’. A first-time ever gathering of over 115 Constitutional County Sheriffs (representing over 3% of America’s sheriffs) from 35 states came together to reaffirm their oaths of office and to learn how to better defend the Constitution of the United States from all enemies, especially domestic. There were also several good deputy sheriffs and police chiefs in attendance. Of note, five California sheriffs attended, all from Northern California, who have been fighting the Federal Government over land, water, and forest rights.

    Myself and a couple dozen Patriots from Oath Keepers and other American patriot groups also attended to lend our support to this historic gathering and to let these brave sheriffs know that We the People stand with them in their ever-increasing battles against over-reaching federal, state, and local government politicians and agencies. We all met and stayed at the Tuscany Hotel for 2 ½ days of strategizing, networking, and classes from top national Constitutional experts and several sheriffs who have been engaged in the struggle to protect their citizens and uphold the 10th Amendment (state’s rights) against the Federal Government.

    The convention was the brain child of retired Arizona Sheriff Richard Mack who has written several great books about how America’s sheriffs can and should honor and uphold their oaths of office and exercise their authority to protect the citizens of their counties and their rights. The convention was organized by Mack and his fellow leaders at Free America Now. Presentations included the The Bill of Rights, 2nd Amendment Rights, 10th Amendment – Nullification and State Sovereignty, Property Rights, Agenda 21, NDAA U.S. Citizen Detention, The Southern Poverty Law Center’s dangerous anti-American Agenda and ties to the Obama Administration, and many other briefs by expert speakers and elected sheriffs. The sheriffs said afterwards they really enjoyed and appreciatd the great information and getting to meet dozens of other like-minded good law enforcers from across the nation. Many of the sheriffs pledged to go back and spread this vital information to their fellow sheriffs in their states about these important issues that all citizens are facing.

    The conference was topped off Tuesday night with a 4 hour program that was open to the public and featured Sheriff Joe Arpaio as the keynote speaker. Joe and Mack are old friends from working together in Arizona. Joe was his usual witty and defiant self, recounting numerous stories of standing up for the rule of law and against corrupt politicians who have been trying to stop him from enforcing the law equally for the past 20 years. Joe also proudly announced that he is now running for reelection for Sheriff ‘just to spite his enemies’, namely the La Raza radicals who try to terrorize Arizona with their constant threats, attacks, and malicious lawsuits.

    Sheriff Joe also gave an update on his Cold Case Posse and their investigation into the eligibility of Barack Obama to be on the Arizona ballot in 2012. They are investigating possible criminal fraud by Obama. Joe promised he would give the final results of the investigation at a press conference near the end of February. He said he hopes the ‘court of public opinion’ will decide if Obama has committed criminal offenses and/or is eligible for the office of president, since the DOJ and Congress certainly will never take any action against him.

    Summary: The 1st Constitutional Sheriffs Convention was a huge success, but it’s just the beginning of this movement of Americans reclaiming their Constitutional Rights. We know hundreds of other county sheriffs and senior law enforcement officers nationwide also want and need this training and the organizers plan to have at least one more convention this year with more conferences in 2013, as well as constant networking and support between meetings. Please forward this email to your country sheriff and encourage him or her to sign up and get involved at http://www.CountySheriffProject.org.

    Sadly, but tellingly was the almost complete blackout of this historic event by the mainstream media. Corporate media and their government handlers obviously do not want this information to get out to the general public, so it’s up to us to make this exciting new movement go viral nationwide. As was said many times during the convention, this truly is “America’s Last Hope” to remain a Constitutional Republic and to retain our unalienable rights to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.

    Good Articles with more details about the Convention:

    http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/02/02/140-u-s-sheriffs-meet-to-take-back-america/

    http://www.constitutionpreservation.org/articles/february-6-2012/sheriff-mack-its-miracle

  48. Kim………………
    The last I heard regarding the Commonwealth of Massa -chussetts, was in name only. I find myself quite troubled in reading what you have said about this matter. Perhaps it is time for real property owners to take a in depth look into the legal validity of their (ALLEGED) ownership. I tend to think that such a situation does effect the legal validity of property ownership. This also means that there is NO county level of law enforcement, nor is their any county level of fire protection, then lastly there are no county school systems. In conclusion then I assume that the state actually OWNS the areas that would be counties in all other states.

  49. This gives me cause to question who actually owns the PRIVATE property in Massachusetts, because if the (alleged) Commonwealth owns it then the property owner who holds the deed, is no longer the owner of his property,yet he is paying taxes on it. If the property has been legally confiscated by the Commonwealth, then the property owner DOESN’T owe any taxes on it. Further it would seem that we now see the beginning of property confiscation in our respective states. If this is accurate then people had better act to correct the problem. Otherwise you could discover the hard way that you NO LONGER own your home.

  50. BYEBYE time to load and lock.

  51. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    bob strauss | February 5, 2012 at 5:31 pm |

    Putting their Soros puppets in place, getting ready to steal the 2012 election.
    _________________________________________

    REMEMBER RULE #30 of “The Democrat Party’s Manifesto”

    30 – Remember what our Uncle Joe Stalin said-”It’s not who votes that counts, it’s who counts the votes”

  52. Mr. Bill(ms. helga) | February 6, 2012 at 8:50 am |

    bob strauss | February 5, 2012 at 5:31 pm |

    Putting their Soros puppets in place, getting ready to steal the 2012 election.
    _________________________________________

    REMEMBER RULE #30 of “The Democrat Party’s Manifesto”

    30 – Remember what our Uncle Joe Stalin said-”It’s not who votes that counts, it’s who counts the votes”
    **********************************
    They installed Al Franken as Senator in MN, using a Soros SOS.

  53. Isn’t it interesting that a speech of Malcolm X from 1961 was recently discovered at Brown University. 1961, the alleged year of birth of President Barack Obama? With all this stuff in the air about the possible connection between Obama and Malcolm X, this little tidbit becomes more meaningful. I imagine Martha Trowbridge will have a field day with this.

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/02/05/MN0F1N3EKQ.DTL

  54. Continuing from my post above, in that sfgate article on the discovery of the Malcolm X speech from 1961, there is a connection between him and Obama by way of Richard Holbrooke. At the time, in 1961, Holbrooke was the editor of the Brown University student newspaper, and he helped arranged the visit of Malcolm X to Brown. Years later, Holbrooke would become Obama’s special advisor on Pakistan and Afghanistan before his death in 2010. These are interesting connections which deserve to be looked at in more detail.

  55. America after Obama
    By Jeff Lukens

    Barack Obama has gone from the “one we’ve been waiting for” to the one we can’t wait to kick out. No one ever thought one man could bring the nation to its knees, but here he is living in the White House. And on our knees we have been, praying for the day when he leaves.

    Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/02/america_after_obama.html#ixzz1lc8M15zj

  56. The Intangible Soul link that has the info/question about Malihi/Iranian muslim connection has been attacked. When leaving there I got a notice of a blocked attack.

  57. So Now You Know The Rest Of The Story:

    This clears up a huge question,,,

    The year was 1947.
    Some of you will recall that on July 8, 1947,
    a little more than 64 years ago,
    numerous witnesses claim that
    an Unidentified Flying Object, (UFO),
    with five aliens aboard,
    crashed onto a sheep and mule ranch
    just outside Roswell , New Mexico .

    This is a well known incident
    that many say has long been covered-up
    by the U.S. Air Force,
    as well as other Federal Agencies
    and Organizations.

    However,
    what you may NOT know is that
    in the month of April, year 1948,
    nine months after the historic day,
    the following people were born:

    Barrack Obama Sr.
    Albert A. Gore, Jr.
    Hillary Rodham
    William J. Clinton
    John F. Kerry
    Howard Dean
    Nancy Pelosi
    Dianne Feinstein
    Charles E. Schumer
    Barbara Boxer
    Joe Biden

    This is the consequence
    of aliens breeding
    with sheep and jack-asses.

    I truly hope this bit of information
    clears up a lot of things for you.
    It certainly did for me.

    And now you can stop wondering why
    they support the bill
    to help all Illegal Aliens

  58. On “Fox & Friends” Monday morning, The Daily Caller’s senior editor, Jamie Weinstein, discussed TheDC’s Sunday night dinner with former Weather Underground leaders and friends of President Obama Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn.

    WATCH:

    Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/02/06/the-daily-caller-dines-with-former-terrorist-leaders-video/#ixzz1lcDUy5Ns

  59. RMINNC………………
    Maybe even a lot closer to the truth than any of us suspect.

  60. Document Dump
    Justice Ginsburg causes storm dissing the Constitution while abroad

    Read more: http://dailycaller.com/#ixzz1lcGQWtIJ

    http://dailycaller.com/2012/02/06/justice-ginsburg-causes-storm-dissing-the-constitution-while-abroad/

    Yes, form your constitution based on the progressive and PC era of judgement!

  61. RMINNC…………………
    A young man who was in Desert Storm once told a friend of mine that when there are no male goats around in the Islamic back country the goat herders substitute their own parts. This freshens a female goat. That is why I originally made the joke about Saddam being upset because the US embargo had cut off his supply of INFLATABLE LOVE GOATS.

  62. Observer……………….
    Boy,talk about the wicked witch of the East…….who’d have even thought her BROOM would fly that far.

  63. I would bet that she has multiple brooms hovering 24/7 about 3′ above the floor all WARMED UP and ready to be SAT ON for as long as the ride takes. Just open a window and whoosh up,up and away with MMMMSSSS. G

  64. Doesn’t the predominant number of UFO reports seem to fit into the MMMSSS.G life period. Maybe she is what everybody has been seeing in various parts of the world. Just put a pointed black hat on her and VOILA you have the Wicked witch of the East. I would bet that privately she even CACKLES too.

  65. Yea Old Salt….I think that alien breeding stuff spread to the middle east….

    Seems like America is saturated with it now. We can’t seem to get enough Ailens here to satisfy us.

  66. BYE BYE all. Got other things to attend to!

  67. Hi, Jackie,
    Long time no see. I’m so glad that you posted that about Sheriff Joe. That’s what I came on here to find out, is if anyone had heard when he’s coming out with the investigation.

  68. “MISSING the FINE PRINT in GEORGIA”
    ©2012 jbjd


    “At the risk of exposing myself as the only birther in the room able to view the recent events in GA from the ‘glass half full perspective’; I want to point out, in fact, a lot of good news came out of this fiasco. For example, counting down in no particular order of import:”

    http://jbjd.org/2012/02/06/missing-the-fine-print-in-ga/

  69. JS

    main stream media are in the anti american crowd and have been for a long time

    WE THE PEOPLE must take back our nation
    with our voting power
    and
    not letting up with our representatives in CONGRESS

  70. Judge Malihi has a tradition of being overturned by the Georgia Secretary of State. It happened in 2000, when Cathy Cox took him to task over a very bad ruling on a ballot issue. She said, “accepting the view of the ALJ would mean that a candidate can determine his or her own qualifications …” She also criticized his interpretations of law.

    http://sos.georgia.gov/pressrel/pr000607.htm

    Technically, history could repeat since Malihi failed to cite actual “Findings of Fact” (as in no legal evidence Obama was born in Hawaii) and “Conclusions of Law” (rejecting Supreme Court precedent on defining NBC in favor of a second-rate, self-contradicting appeals court fabrication based on a creative reading of Wong Kim Ark).

  71. Thanks ksdb.

  72. GORDO | February 6, 2012 at 12:54 pm | “MISSING the FINE PRINT in GEORGIA”
    ©2012 jbjd
    …=====================================

    Now, stop leaving your democracy in the hands of this crazy cast of characters; and write the damn laws. HOW to WRITE SMART CANDIDATE ELIGIBILITY LAWS in your STATE (and make applying to get on the ballot harder than applying to get into Harvard) Then, make sure the rules are in place to carry out these laws. (I still can’t believe while these people went to all that trouble to file a ballot challenge on the basis of eligibility; they didn’t bother to ask the SoS to promulgate rules to carry out the GA ballot law.)

    If your state already has a candidate ballot eligibility law; petition the SoS to promulgate emergency rules to carry out the intention of the legislation. There is no legitimate reason these cannot be in place by the time these same state officials receive the DNC Service Corporation’s Certification of Barack Obama’s 2012 nomination.

    Ah, yes…..the utopia of bureaucratic positions beyond political influence. Gosh, darn, if the current system isn’t workable….so just rewrite the system and, why, of course you can easily do that overnight without any opposition from the well, opposition. It’s the same with our old, drag feet Constitution. It’s just too darn inconvenient and time consuming to go through the right procedures so forget the whole thing and adopt some more convenient example that hasn’t even gotten its feet wet as far as testing goes. And what I always love about these darts tossed from the balcony upon the actors on stage below is that those stupeeed people who continue to risk their time, money and trouble, putting their gems of truth before the ignorant swine occupying positions of assumed “trustworthy” authorities are always the brunt of these repetitive criticisms. And yet, without their trials and expertise and discovery being placed before a public who would be prevented otherwise from seeing or hearing these truths such ivory tower critics would have nothing to use to build up their own artificial reputations. Shoulda, woulda doesn’t get the message out there. It takes real people…..fools for truth…..who become the real tools for refounding our American identity.

  73. February 6, 2012
    Santorum revives Pawlenty’s ‘Obamneycare’ attack

    After former Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty bashed Rick Santorum’s record Monday, speaking in his capacity as a surrogate for Mitt Romney, the Santorum campaign revived Pawlenty’s “Obamneycare” attack on Romney from July to go after both of them.

    Pawlenty held a conference call Monday to attack Santorum, saying he supported pork-barrel legislation and earmarking during his time in Congress. The Romney campaign is going after Santorum, following a poll that shows him edging Romney in Minnesota, which holds its contest Tuesday. Santorum is also expected to be a contender in the non-binding Missouri primary on Tuesday.

    A Santorum press release following the call labeled Romney “Proud defender and author of ‘Obamneycare,’” a term coined by Pawlenty himself when he was a presidential contender, meant to suggest that Romneycare and Obamacare were one and the same.

    “As Governor Tim Pawlenty so aptly said, RomneyCare should be called ObamneyCare,” said Hogan Gidley, National Communications Director for the Santorum campaign in the press release. “Everyone knows that Governor Romney’s top down government run mandated health insurance plan was the basis of ObamaCare.”

    “Oddly enough, the only accomplishment that Gov. Romney points to and actually defends during his tenure as Governor – is the most liberal, the most intrusive and unconstitutional. In fact, the only area conservatives would appreciate Romney flip-flopping on would be RomneyCare. So why he doubles down on this liberal accomplishment instead of just flip-flopping as usual is beyond me. We’re all looking for Gov. Romney to finally have firm conviction on something, but it’s pretty telling that he picks RomneyCare,” Gidley added.

    Earlier Monday, the Romney campaign sent out a press release attacking Santorum for his “false attacks on Massachusetts health care.”

    Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/02/06/santorum-revives-pawlentys-obamneycare-attack/#ixzz1ld3mrrEN

  74. Conservatives can test their metal when having the real choice between what they’ve said they wanted now for years and what they may probably once again accept in another establishment backed flip flopper on the most important issues (moral, ethical, and where your tax dollars will still likely end up via another moderate). Remember this is not only a guy who set up a model for Obamacare but said that if a young girl’s parents disagree with her choice of an abortion she can go before some judge for that permission.

    Heading to Minnesota and Missouri, Romney campaign swings at Santorum

    Coming off weeks of alternately attacking Newt Gingrich and President
    Barack Obama, the Romney campaign switched gears on Monday and came out swinging against former Sen. Rick Santorum, who looks to be Romney’s toughest competition in the three primary contests on Tuesday.

    Minnesota and Colorado hold their caucuses on Tuesday, and Missouri holds a non-binding primary that day. Polls suggest that Santorum could perform strongly, especially in Missouri and Minnesota.

    Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/02/06/heading-to-minnesota-and-missouri-romney-campaign-swings-at-santorum/#ixzz1ld6Co6De

  75. Now tell us what you really think:

    more……..http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/

    It is impossible to believe, that Judge Michael Malihi, himself, believed, he was following the constitution and legal precedent. He knows he’s a crook. He knows he’s a liar. He knows, that in his ancestral home country, that unlike America, he would have his head chopped off for what he did.

    snip…..The most telling sign that he was either bribed or threatened shows up in his own actions, of violating his own rulings, just four weeks apart, on the same case.
    As attorney Leo Donofrio points out on his website: http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com
    “His opinion holds that the 14th has the exact same effect as the natural-born citizen clause, while the 14th Amendment does not include the words “natural born Citizen”. Persons claiming citizenship under the 14th Amendment are deemed to be “citizens”. Malihi has added the words “natural born” into the Amendment. This is absolutely forbidden, according to Malihi’s own opinion in the Motion to dismiss, wherein he held: “In the absence of words of limitation, words in a statute should be given their ordinary and everyday meaning.’ Because there is no other ‘natural and reasonable construction’ of the statutory language, this Court is ‘not authorized either to read into or to read out that which would add to or change its meaning.’ ”
    In other words, he claimed one thing on January 3, 2012 and on February 3, 2012 he wrote the exact opposite. Why would any sane man do such a thing?

  76. sigh….I’m caught again in moderation at 2:25…help CW please, thanks.

  77. santorum is going to win wisconsin, minnesota, missouri, OK, and pennsylvania, west virginia,and ohio

    romney will win Michigan, CA OR WAsh UTAH and Arizona, and most of new england

    Gingrich will win georgia, Texas, alabama, mississippi ,louisiana,

    this isn’t over by a long shot

  78. A Must Read OUT OF MORMANISM BY ROBERTSON
    REAL LIFE STORY CK INFO http://WWW.AMAZON.COM

    AMERICA NEEDS TO KNOW NOW!!!!!!!!! PASS ON

  79. observer | February 6, 2012 at 2:25 pm |
    Now tell us what you really think:
    …….In other words, he claimed one thing on January 3, 2012 and on February 3, 2012 he wrote the exact opposite. Why would any sane man do such a thing?
    ========================

    Coercion, by definition – the use of force or threats to make somebody do something against his or her will.

  80. Obama Ballot Challenge is erroneously reporting that the deadline for a Florida challenge of election is Feb. 10. This is not true. The window is 10 days AFTER the final CERTIFICATION of the elction, which is 2/14. The window is 2/14-2/24.

  81. Thanks Mick.
    BTW, I never stated it was 10 days after the primary.

  82. if i am not mistaken , church of latter days saints
    teaching says somewhere (someone find it) that satan
    was jesus’s brother before becoming a fallen angel ?!
    :O
    (and this was NOT covered in the South Park Episode)

  83. Da Verg
    Google: Mormon, Jesus, brother….lots on this…

  84. DUAL VOTES WITH LOYALTY TO WHOM?
    Israel is a good example of this issue. In their 1999 elections, the two parties stood for very divergent policies with regard to the security of that country. Yet every American Jew who voted in that election, whether left or right in their political views, would not be in Israel for the consequences.
    In the US, Israeli’s get to vote for US candidates that promise to funnel US money to Israel and send US soldiers to fight to the last America.
    HOLDING OFFICE IN OR SERVING A FOREIGN COUNTRY
    Next to voting, holding office is among the most important public privileges of citizenship and membership in a community. Individuals have many reasons for wishing to gain public office. They may wish to serve out of a sense of wishing to repay in some way the benefits that come with being a member of this community, they may do so out of a sense of civic responsibility or their desire to help improve and protect their country, their own ambitions, or some mixture.
    There are dual citizen Israeli’s (such as Carl Levin who wants the US military to arrest people on his say-so )serving themselves in the US Congress and Senate. There are many others.
    SERVING IN A FOREIGN ARMY
    The willingness to serve and protect your country is one of the most solemn responsibilities of citizenship. The Oath of Allegiance taken by new American citizens says in part, “that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law.” That oath, an outgrowth of a long history of citizen-solders, reflects the critical importance of being willing, even in an age of a volunteer army, to serve if necessary. There is no more important stake that a citizen has than the protection or preservation of his or her country.
    A prominent example of this is Rahm Emanuel – the current Mayor of Chicago. He served in the ISRAELI Army. He was born in the US – but chose to serve in the Israeli Army.
    His actions certainly demonstrate where his loyalty was and is.

  85. MASSIVELY OVER-REPRESENTED IN KEY POLICY MAKING POSITIONS
    So who are these people? It is instructive to note who controls, for example, the U.S. Treasury Department.
    Timothy F. Geithner (Jew) – Secretary of the Treasury
    Neal S. Wolin (Jew) – Deputy Secretary of the Treasury
    Stuart A. Levey (Jew) – Under Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence
    Alan Krueger (Jew) – Assistant Secretary for Economic Policy
    Michael S. Barr (Jew) – Assistant Secretary for Financial Institutions
    David S. Cohen (Jew) – Assistant Secretary for Terrorist Financing
    Herbert M. Allison, Jr. (White European) – Assistant Secretary for Financial Stability and Counselor to the Secretary
    Of the seven (7) top officials in the U.S. Treasury Department, six (6) are Jews. How many of these Jews are citizens of the Jewish Nation (Israel)?
    This is a numerical representation of 86%.
    Jews are approximately 2% of the United States population.
    This means that Jews are over-represented among the top officials of the U.S. Treasury Department by a factor of 43 times, or 4,300 percent.
    This extreme numerical over-representation of Jews among the top officials of the U.S. Treasury Department cannot be explained away as a coincidence or as the result of mere random chance.
    You must ask yourself how such an incredibly small and extremely unrepresentative minority ethnic group that only represents 2% of the American population could so completely dominate the U.S. Treasury Department.
    GEORGE SOROS?
    Someone mentioned that Soros might be responsible for aiding in the Obama Deception.
    The birth-name of George Soros is György Schwartz. SOROS aka Schwartz is a Jew. SOROS aka Schwartz is a citizen of the Jewish Nation. SOROS aka Schwartz is a good example of the problem we face.
    NOT AN ISOLATED CASE
    You may want to take a look at other key policy making positions within the government as well – and note who the people are who are holding those positions.
    Prepare to vomit if you decide to look into the ownership of the various media outlets in the US – or management positions in ALL of the US Federal Reserve system member banks. They’re “kosher”.
    POLICIES OF THE JEWISH NATION
    Our perpetual wars against Israel’s enemies – where Israel fights using American soldiers are starting to make more sense now…aren’t they?
    So is it “anti-Semitic” to state facts?
    If you want to know who’s “running things” – just follow the money.

  86. I’m wondering if we will ever find out the truth. Not in our lifetime at least.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s