Obama subpoena revisited, PDF files revealing, Subpoena and WhiteHouse.gov birth certificate, Fraud and corruption revelations

Obama subpoena revisited, PDF files revealing, Subpoena and WhiteHouse.gov birth certificate, Fraud and corruption revelations

“Why were portions of the motion to subpoena Obama by the Blagojevich defense team, damning to Obama, redacted?”…Citizen Wells

“Why did the Illinois Senate Health & Human Services Committee, with Obama as chairman, create and push Bill 1332, “Illinois Health Facilities Planning Act,” early in 2003, which reduced the number of members on the Board from 15 to 9, just prior to rigging by Tony Rezko and Rod Blagojevich?”…Citizen Wells

“I believe I’m more pristine on Rezko than him.”…Rod Blagojevich

Two PDF documents have appeared over the past several years that reveal fraud and corruption involving Barack Obama. In both cases, characteristics of the Adobe PDF files allowed for deceptions to come to light.

On April 22, 2010 a motion was filed by the Rod Blagojevich team to subpoena Barack Obama. The motion was presented to the public in PDF format with portions redacted (blacked out). However, someone failed to tag the document to not allow copying of the text. The complete unredacted motion was soon presented.

On April 27, 2011 an image was placed on WhiteHouse.gov purported to be Barack Obama’s long form birth certificate. Simple analysis using readily available software tools soon revealed the document as a fraud. A concocted image. It has always been the position of Citizen Wells that the wording “or abstract” at the bottom of the image automatically disqualified it as proof of being a copy of an original birth certificate.

In depth analysis of the WhiteHouse.gov image was performed by the cold case posse of Sheriff Joe Arpaio. Read more about that here.
http://www.westernjournalism.com/highlights-of-sheriff-joes-most-recent-press-conference/
Motion to subpoena Barack Obama.

From MSNBC April 22, 2010.

“Former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich asked a federal judge on Thursday to issue a subpoena for President Barack Obama to testify as a witness at his corruption trial.”

“The motion seeking Obama’s testimony contained several paragraphs that had been blacked out. This action is usually taken when the court has put information under seal.
The defense attorney said there was a conflict between comments made by Obama at a news conference and statements to federal prosecutors made by a labor union president and a candidate for the seat.
The specifics of the statements from the union president and the candidate were blacked out in the version of the motion that was filed publicly on the court docket.
“There are two conflicting stories and the defense has the right to admit evidence that contradicts the government’s claims,” the motion said.”

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36716915/ns/politics/t/blagojevich-lawyers-want-obama-subpoena/#.T5AT_KsV33c

Motion to subpoena Obama redacted portions.

From Fox News April 23, 2010.

“The blacked-out portions of a subpoena request filed by lawyers for former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich — which were revealed through a simple computer trick — suggest President Obama may have played a role in finding his own Senate replacement.
On Thursday, Blagojevich’s lawyers asked a federal judge to subpoena the president to testify about questions surrounding the government’s allegation that Blagojevich was selling or trading Obama’s Senate seat after his election to the White House in November 2008.
“President Barack Obama has direct knowledge of the Senate seat allegation,” reads Blagojevich’s 11-page motion, filed with U.S. District Judge James B. Zagel.
The court erred when it posted the motion in a pdf file with redactions that could be revealed simply by copying and pasting the blacked-out portions to a plain text file.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/04/23/uncovered-portions-blacked-subpoena-suggest-obama-advised-blagojevich-senate/

Motion to subpoena Obama redacted portions revealed.

Here is one of the more interesting revelations in the redacted portions.
“22. However, the defense has a good faith belief that Mr. Rezko, President Obama’s former friend, fund-raiser, and neighbor told the FBI and the United States Attorneys a different story about President Obama. In a recent in camera proceeding, the government tendered a three paragraph letter indicating that Rezko “has stated in interviews with the government that he engaged in election law violations by personally contributing a large sum of cash to the campaign of a public official who is not Rod Blagojevich. … Further, the public official denies being aware of cash contributions to his campaign by Rezko or others and denies having conversations with Rezko related to cash contributions. … Rezko has also stated in interviews with the government that he believed he transmitted a quid pro quo offer from a lobbyist to the public official, whereby the lobbyist would hold a fundraiser for the official in exchange for favorable official action, but that the public official rejected the offer. The public official denies any such
conversation. In addition, Rezko has stated to the government that he and the
public official had certain conversations about gaming legislation and
administration, which the public official denies having had.”10″

“10 The defense has a good faith belief that this public official is Barack Obama. See, “Obama on Rezko deal: It was a mistake”, Dave McKinney, Chris Fusco, and Mark Brown, Chicago Sun Times, November 5, 2006. Senator Barack Obama was asked: “Did Rezko or his companies ever solicit your support on any matter involving state or federal government? Did Al Johnson, who was trying to get a casino license along with Tony Rezko, or Rezko himself ever discuss casino matters with you?” Senator Obama answered: “No, I have never been asked to do anything to advance his business interest. In 1999, when I was a State Senator, I opposed legislation to bring a casino to Rosemont and allow casino gambling at docked riverboats which news reports said Al Johnson and Tony
Rezko were interested in being part of. I never discussed a casino license with either of them. I was a vocal opponent of the legislation.” Obama’s involvement with Tony Rezko and this legislation coincides with the three paragraph summary the government has provided to the defense referenced above.”
There’s that messy “quid pro quo” phrase again. It seems to be popping up with regularity in the same sentence with Obama.

This subpoena begs further scrutiny.

About these ads

125 responses to “Obama subpoena revisited, PDF files revealing, Subpoena and WhiteHouse.gov birth certificate, Fraud and corruption revelations

  1. Spiritual Angel Of God

    Bypass Mainstream Media

    http://obamaballotchallenge.com/bypass-mainstream-media-to-expose-obama-for-the-fraud-he-is

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    “The End Of America Movie”

    “The End Of America Movie” details the ten steps a country takes when it slides toward fascism. It’s not a “lefty” tome, rather a historical look at trends in once-functioning democracies from modern history that are being repeated in our country today. It gives any reader (or viewer of the lecture) a much-needed history lesson and constitutional refresher. Most importantly, it puts the recent gradual loss of civil liberties in the U.S. in a historical context.

    The average American might not be alarmed at AT&T selling our private information to the Bush administration, but when this action is seen as part of a larger series of erosions and events, a pattern emerges with unfortunate consequences that become disturbingly clear.

    Naomi Wolf: [Ten key steps to close down an open society: a dictator's blueprint]

    1. Invoke an internal and external threat
    2. Secret prisons where torture takes place
    3. Develop a paramilitary force
    4. Surveillance of ordinary citizens
    5. Infiltrate citizens’ groups
    6. Detain and release ordinary citizens
    7. Target key individuals
    8. Restrict the press
    9. Recast criticism as espionage and dissent as treason
    10. Subvert the rule of law

    Yesterday Congress was quick voting in partial secret on a law much worse than SOPA and it wasn’t televised anywhere except perhaps c-span if at all.

    End Of America – A Movie You Must See To Believe

  2. citizenwells

    Thanks James.

  3. ‘Why Ron Paul Should Not Be President’ (paperback edition)

    * Ron Paul 2012

    I recently found this book, ‘Why Ron Paul Should Not Be President’ on Amazon and thought I’d share it with you guys. It was actually published last year, so I’m not sure if everyone has seen it or not. For those who haven’t, I thought you’d get a kick out of it:

    http://www.amazon.com/Why-Ron-Paul-Should-President/dp/14662

  4. Spiritual Angel Of God

    Bypass Mainstream Media to Expose Obama for the Fraud He Is

    Posted by By GeorgeM at 17 April, at 07 : 25 AM Print

    “What do CNN, NBC, CBS, FOX, ABC, and PBS have in common?

    All are not telling you about the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office Cold-Case Posse investigation preliminary findings about President Obama’s identification papers. On March 31, 2012 the Surprise Arizona Tea Party along with the Sun City West Arizona Tea Party invited Sheriff Joe Arpaio and Cold Case Posse Commander, Mike Zullo to present their preliminary findings of the Selective Service System Registration Form, and the Long Form Certificate of Live Birth.

    They came as a public service to inform over 1,100 citizens about the largest Constitutional crisis that faces America since the Civil War.

    You don’t know that it is happening because you aren’t being told by the media because of alleged threats of FCC and FTC sanctions if they report the news to the public.

    So, in an attempt to break the news ”blackout,” A DVD of the event is being offered by “Waking Up America.” This is, in our opinion, the best video presentation of the March 31, 2012 event. Four, high-tech cameras were used with state of the art equipment to put you in the middle of the presentation.

    We are encouraging you to order a DVD, invite your family, friends, neighbors, church groups, clubs, public service organizations, to come together to view the ”news” that the establishment doesn’t want you to see. Play the DVD at a local theater, at home or at church.

    Watch the event. Discuss the event.

    Contact your legislature and let them know what is happening in Arizona. Talk among yourselves and get the word out to others. The survival of our country depends on the public seeing the truth and spreading the word.

    With God’s help, ONLY WE THE PEOPLE are going to inform the nation about the unprecedented dangers we currently face.

    I would encourage you to order this amazing DVD. The cost is $12 plus $1 for shipping for a total cost of $13.00. Please include your return mailing address and phone number. Orders may be placed by mailing a check for $13.00 to:

    “Waking Up America”
    P.O. Box 2312
    Sun City, Arizona 85372

    Thank you for reading this and ordering the “news” that will infuriate Americans who love their country. Thanks to “Waking Up America” for making this offer available.

    Sincerely,
    Brian Reilly

    Surprise Tea Party & Sun City West Tea Party

    (We receive no compensation from this offer. We are simply spreading the word.)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Please Support the Florida and Other Ballot Challenges!!

    http://obamaballotchallenge.com/bypass-mainstream-media-to-expose-obama-for-the-fraud-he-is

  5. CONFIRMED OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS A FAKE!!! MAKE VIRAL!!!

    Published on Mar 2, 2012

    Follow this link to sign a form for a full investigation into OBAMA!!!

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    Reality Check: Obama Impeached???

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

  6. jacqlynsmith

    Dylan Ratigan’s “Fed Doc’s and The Revolving Door”… A Lot of Nothing that Really Says A Lot…

    Video and other info found here…….

    http://kauilapele.wordpress.com/2012/04/16/dylan-ratigans-fed-docs-and-the-revolving-door-a-lot-of-nothing-that-really-says-a-lot/

  7. “Yahoo is censoring TheObamaFile.com”

    http://theobamafile.websitetoolbox.com/post/Yahoo-is-censoring-TheObamaFile.com-5805060

    Beckwith:
    ========
    Today at 10:18 AM:

    “One of the members sent me an email this AM, informing me that Yahoo was censoring comments that referenced The Obama File.

    I figured there must have been some kind of a glitch — after all why would giant Yahoo be censoring the website of a 72-year old news aggregator?

    There’s nothing in The Obama File that shouldn’t be available via their own search engine.

    So, I thought I’d check it out.”
    —–
    Today at 10:55 AM:

    “I posted a comment on this Yahoo page, “Obama: ‘I wasn’t born with a silver spoon in my mouth’,” from a website that should be very threatening to Yahoo and Team Obama — the TEA Party Patriots.

    It’s still there — check it out.

    It is clear that I can post to Yahoo. Yahoo is not censoring my personal comments as suggested. They are censoring comments that reference The Obama File.

    Go to Yahoo and post a comment referencing TheObamaFile.com yourself — see what happens!

    This is completely different than being banned for violating the terms of service.”

  8. cw

    Has there been any leaks as to how Blagojevich is dealing with being locked up in prison? I guess I feel sorry for him but mostly for his children. He was a little guy caught up in the “I wanna be part of the corruption” but he ended up being the little worm that the big fish swallowed up!

    My motto that I have taught my children and grand children is….”Life does not owe you a thing…it is what you make of it”

  9. http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/66894/secret-service-blackmail/

    Can’t wait to see how the Colombian prostitution “scandal” plays out. Why? Secret Service holds lots of secrets about the sexual misbehavior of Presidents and their senior staffs. If you take away these guys livelihoods and leave them no option for continuing their careers I would not be surprised to see some, in a bid to save themselves, divulging long kept secrets.

    If there is any dirt on Obama, this could be the opening. I doubt that anyone would be shocked to learn that prominent politicians could be so sexually reckless.

  10. The only problem with this is what keeps the Dems/Acorn types from dummying up phony IDs?? I mean they’re pretty good at forging stuff, obviously!

    http://dailycaller.com/2012/04/18/kirsten-powers-democrats-are-sort-of-trapped-in-the-past-on-voter-id-opposition-video/

  11. Frawley got 1 year and 1 day.

  12. Obama’s Next Big Power Grab to Destroy US Industry & Recreation – Zoning the Oceans
    Posted by Jim Hoft on Thursday, April 19, 2012, 1:46 PM

    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/04/obamas-next-big-power-grab-to-destroy-us-industry-recreation-zoning-the-oceans/

    It is common knowledge these days that Barack Obama cannot be happy unless he is taking away your freedom and prosperity. The latest power grab by the Radical in Chief is the “Zone the Ocean” law.
    Human Events reported:

    President Barack Obama has an ambitious plan for Washington bureaucrats to take command of the oceans—and with it control over much of the nation’s energy, fisheries, even recreation in a move described by lawmakers as the ultimate power grab to zone the seas.

    The massive undertaking also includes control over key inland waterways and rivers that reach hundreds of miles upstream, and began with little fanfare when Obama signed an executive order in 2010 to protect the aquatic environment.

    “This one to me could be the sleeping power grab that Americans will wake up to one day and wonder what the heck hit them,” said Rep. Bill Flores (R –Texas).

    “This is pure administrative fiat,” said Sen. David Vitter (R –La.). “It’s very troubling.”

    “This is purely a unilateral administrative action with no real congressional input or oversight,” Vitter said. “I think it clearly threatens to have a big impact on a lot of industry, starting with energy, oil and gas, and fishing.”

    But in his zeal to curb sea sprawl, lawmakers say the president’s executive order also gives Washington officialdom unprecedented reach to control land use as well.

    “The order says they shall develop a scheme for oversight of oceans and all the sources thereof,” Flores said. “So you could have a snowflake land on Pikes Peak and ultimately it’s going to wind up in the water, so as a result they could regulate on every square inch of U.S. soil.”

    The Draft National Ocean Policy Implementation Plan was released earlier this year. It is an an attempt to provide actionable guidance on implementation of the policy. The group behind the effort says the new laws will protect millions of Americans.

  13. Seriously? Frawley only got 1 year and 1 day? What a travesty.

  14. citizenwells

    Thanks Bessie.

  15. citizenwells

    Ginger, Blago told his wife he is doing well.

  16. A Crazy Old Coot

    OT

    http://www.examiner.com/​article/​obama-officially-ineligible

    Obama officially ineligible
    snip…………..

    Lawyers representing the current sitting President of the United States of America have been forced, under penalty of perjury, to admit that the long-form birth certificate presented by the White House in April of 2011 is a total forgery.

    snip…..
    In what may turn out to be one of the biggest scandals in the history of the United States, the Obama administration itself has now virtually admitted to High Crimes and Misdemeanors and to deceiving the public into believing a lie that was ironically intended to distract awareness from the actual issue that truly determines his eligibility, or lack thereof.

  17. Coot…
    Link no good…may have been scrubbed?

  18. crazy old coot….

    the website you listed above does not work……have any more where this story may be?

  19. Philo-Publius

    The forgery claim is incorrect and noted by CNAV in this article:

    “…Ms. Hill then said that the PDF document was irrelevant to the case at hand, and conceded that Obama never once gave his birth certificate, or any good copy of it, hard or soft, to the New Jersey Secretary of State or the Division of Elections. Hill then claimed that New Jersey law did not force Obama to give anything to qualify himself for a primary ballot, and that New Jersey residents could nominate Mickey Mouse if they could get enough signatures to nominate him.

    The Tea Party Tribune, and other media organs quoting them, construed this as saying that Alexandra Hill “admitted that the Obama birth certificate is a forgery.” That is not correct…”
    http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2012/04/18/firstamendment/obama-eligibility-media-pressure/

  20. Philo Publius
    I believe that this is more than likely the case here. If it indeed is the case, jbjd warned that this was so some time ago. Had the BO campaign actually submitted the fraudulent BC as some, or any, kind of proof concerning elegibility, not only would they have been commiting fraud, but they would have exposed themselves to estoppel. Estoppel in this case, would mean that, if your proof was relied upon for any reason, then that proof could not be withdrawn or changed in any way.

  21. FS
    If I were to send agents against BO, they would look just like them…

  22. snip…..
    In what may turn out to be one of the biggest scandals in the history of the United States, the Obama administration itself has now virtually admitted to High Crimes and Misdemeanors and to deceiving the public into believing a lie that was ironically intended to distract awareness from the actual issue that truly determines his eligibility, or lack thereof.

    ————

    Can we get anyone to do anything about this? Congress isn’t doing anything or the courts, and of course the press does nothing too.

  23. UPDATE:

    http://theobamafile.websitetoolbox.com/post/show_single_post?pid=1273164613&postcount=5

    Today at 04:43 PM:

    Beckwith:

    “False alarm!

    Yahoo just doesn’t like links, and deletes every comment with a link.

    It took a while to figure it out.”

  24. http://washington.cbslocal.com/2012/04/19/cbs-news-ousted-secret-service-agent-planning-lawsuit/

    This comes as CBS News also learned that one of the Secret Service agents removed from duty is planning to file a lawsuit.

  25. Philo-Publius

    coldwarvet2 as much as we all would like to believe Obama’s team admitted to forgery, we can’t help promote deception or we would be no better than the enemy. In fact, our integrity and the seeking of the truth as CW promotes here on a daily basis would be called into question with just cause if we perpetuate any lies. The truth is revealing itself with facts at a snail’s pace but those facts are what we can cite to advance our debate. It is the other side which denies facts, promotes lies and distortion and that is why they will fail in the end.

    “Truth will ultimately prevail where there is pains to bring it to light.”
    – George Washington

  26. Through the Mirror w/Larry Sinclair

    Show & Guest Schedule

    April 16, 2012 thru April 2o, 2012

    Monday April 16, 2012

    Veterans for Ron Paul 2012

    Colonel Doug Macgregor (ret)

    Colonel Macgregor is a decorated combat veteran, the author of four books, a PhD, and a spokesman of the Veterans for Ron Paul 2012. Visit Veterans for Ron Paul on FACEBOOK Veterans for Ron Paul to march on the Republican National Convention Ron Paul is the choice of the troops – Veterans march in Washington DC 20 feb 2012

    Colonel Macgregor’s Books Warrior’s Rage , Breaking the Phalanx, Transformation Under Fire: Revolutionizing How America Fights and The Soviet-East German Military Alliance.

    http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/ttm-guest-list/

  27. Through the Mirror w/Larry Sinclair

    Show & Guest Schedule

    April 17th
    Gary Marbut

    Gun Owners For Ron Paul 2012

    Gary Marbut is the President of the Montana Shooting Sports Association and is also the spokesman of Gun Owners For Ron Paul 2012. Gary has been featured on the Glenn Beck Show and other nationwide media for his work protecting the 2nd Amendment. Marbut is the author of Montana Firearms Freedom Act
    http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/ttm-guest-list/

  28. Through the Mirror w/Larry Sinclair

    Wednesday April 18, 2012

    Jun Dam, Founder

    Jun Dam is the founder of Grassroots for Liberty SuperPAC, is also behind has set up a phone for Ron Paul from home program, has hosted contests, and helped get supporters to Iowa.

    http://www.youtube.com/user/rp2012org

  29. Through the Mirror w/Larry Sinclair

    Thursday April 19, 2012

    Minister Derrick Grayson,

    TMOT aka The Minister of Truth of Georgia spokesman for Christians for Ron Paul. Minister Grayson has been making hard hitting and entertaining videos in support of Texas Congressman Dr. Ron Paul.

    http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/ttm-guest-list/

  30. Through the Mirror w/Larry Sinclair

    Friday April 20, 2012

    “Blue Republican” movement of Democrats and Independents supporting Ron Paul

    Robin Koerner

    Robin Koerner is a 30-something British permanent resident of the USA. He is the founder and publisher of http://www.WatchingAmerica.com , an organization of 400 volunteers that is dedicated to translating and posting in English news and views about the USA from all over the world. He holds degrees in physics and philosophy from Cambridge University (UK), has lived on three continents, and has experience in the fields of the media, real estate and teaching.

    He is now best know in the USA as the person who coined the term “Blue Republican” to refer to Independents and Democrats who are registering Republican specifically to secure a Ron Paul victory in 2012 – something he strongly urges they should do! Go to http://www.BlueRepublican.org or the Facebook page. Most of his important writings, including the article that inspired the Blue Republican movement for Ron Paul can be found at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robin-koerner/

  31. Through the Mirror w/Larry Sinclair

    Show & Guest Schedule

    April 23, 2012 thru April 27, 2012

    Monday April 23, 2012

    Michael Scheuer, Endorsed Ron Paul 2012

    Michael Scheuer, former head of the CIA’s Bin Laden unit and author of Imperial Hubris has endorsed Ron Paul. Michael F. Scheuer (born 1952) is a former CIA intelligence officer, American blogger, historian, foreign policy critic, and political analyst. He is currently an adjunct professor at Georgetown University’s Center for Peace and Security Studies and an Expert at Wikistrat. In his 22-year career, he served as the Chief of the Bin Laden Issue Station (aka “Alec Station”), from 1996 to 1999, the Osama bin Laden tracking unit at the Counterterrorist Center. He then worked again as Special Advisor to the Chief of the bin Laden unit from September 2001 to November 2004.

  32. Tuesday April 24, 2012

    Brian Jacobs, Christians For Ron Paul

    Brian Jacobs, Senior Pastor of the Metroplex Family Church who used to work with Rev. Billy Graham, is a spokesman of Christians for Ron Paul, and has been sending 1,000’s of DVD’s to fellow Christian leaders. It was Pastor Jacobs that introduced Rev. Graham to President George W. Bush during the 2000 election.

    http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/ttm-guest-list/

  33. Through the Mirror w/Larry Sinclair

    Wednesday April 25, 2012

    Dr. Walter Block, Ph.D. Founding Member Jews for Ron Paul

    Walter E. Block, Ph.D.

    Dr. Walter Block is a founding member of Jews for Ron Paul.

    Harold E. Wirth Eminent Scholar Endowed Chair and Professor of Economics;

    Joseph A. Butt, S.J. College of Business;

    Loyola University New Orleans

    http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/ttm-guest-list/

  34. Larry Sinclair is on fire w Ron Paul interviews

    Thursday April 26, 2012

    TBA

    Friday April 27, 2012

    TBA
    http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/ttm-guest-list/

  35. Philo-Publius | April 19, 2012 at 5:43 pm ,
    Wouldn’t Mario Apuzzo be the one to ask, exactly, what did Obama’s lawyers stipulate to in that NJ eligibility hearing?

    Why are death threats being tossed around, pertaining to this hearing? What are they so upset about?

  36. Whistleblower

    Another Mission Accomplished: Frawley joins Blago and Rezko in the Silence Chamber of Federal Prison

    http://illinoispaytoplay.com/2012/04/19/another-mission-accomplished-frawley-joins-blago-and-rezko-in-the-silence-chamber-of-federal-prison/

  37. Philo Publius
    The reason facts are being revealed so slowly is because they were buried so deeply. You’re correct in that the truth and facts will ultimately prevail, I would hope, in time to affect the election. If not, then I hope we keep the spurs into this guy, because a lot of people are missing the fact that , if he doesn’t get re-elected, he’s still elegible for another term…apart from the huge Constitutional crisis we are left with. I still shudder to think of what these statists have done to us in this short time span, and what it is going to take to straighten things out. There is a very good post over at DR. Kate’s concerning the term “legend”, as it pertains to BO, and very much in keeping with what we are discussing here.

  38. Part of a comment at ORYR:

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/04/far-left-huffington-post-crashes-ann.html?showComment=1334874755168#c872533705772236167

    “Bob M. from Ohio said…

    Dear Robert,

    Thank you for contacting me to express your views on the citizenship of President Obama. It is good to hear from you. To be eligible to run for office, the Constitution requires the President to be a natural-born citizen of the United States. As you may know, the White House has released President Obama’s birth certificate.
    I will continue to take the President at his word that he is a natural born citizen of the United States. I have chosen to focus on the policies the administration pursues, and whether those policies are in the best interest of our nation. Ohio and our nation face many critical challenges, as our economy continues to falter and deficits and our national debt are at record levels. On each issue, I will continue to fight for what is best for Ohio, with a focus on how it will impact jobs in Ohio.
    Thank you again for taking the time to write. For more information, I encourage you to visit my website at http://www.portman.senate.gov. ; Please keep in touch.

    Sincerely,
    Rob Portman
    U.S. Senator”
    ==============
    “Robert Jones “Rob” Portman (born December 19, 1955) is a lawyer and the junior United States Senator from Ohio. He is a member of the Republican Party.”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rob_Portman

  39. Philo-Publius,@5:43pm
    From Mario Apuzzo’s site, here is the stipulation by Obama’s attorneys from the NJ eligibility hearing.

    After calling to the witness stand Mr. Moran and Mr. Purpura, who gave testimony as to why they brought the ballot challenge, and introducing documents showing there is a question as to Mr. Obama’s identity, I called Brian Wilcox to testify as an internet image expert. Mr. Wilcox was going to testify on how the Obama April 27, 2011, long-form birth certificate has been altered and manipulated either by computer software or by a human or both, producing a forged documents, and that since the image is not reliable, we need to see the original paper version. Obama’s lawyer objected to my proffered testimony. I then offered that I would not need to have Mr. Wilcox testify, provided that Obama stipulated that the internet image of his birth certificate could not be used as evidence by either Judge Masin or the New Jersey Secretary of States and that he presented to the court or the Secretary of State no other evidence of his identity or place of birth. Judge Masin also asked Obama’s attorney whether she would so stipulate. She did so stipulate, agreeing that both the court and the Secretary of State cannot rely on the internet birth certificate as evidence of Obama’s place of birth and that Obama has produced no other evidence to the court regarding his place of birth. She also argued that Obama has no legal obligation to produce any such evidence to get on the primary ballot. Judge Masin then took the issue under advisement. Having produced absolutely no evidence of his eligibility for the Office of President, Judge Masin will decide whether as a matter of law Obama has a legal duty to produce such evidence before he may be placed on the New Jersey ballot in light of the pending objection filed against him. If he decides that he does, then the Objection will be successful. If he decides that Obama has no such legal obligation, the Objection would fail on the first issue.

  40. Bob Strauss,
    I think that it was BO’s attorney that may have received the death threat. I believe she stated that there indeed was no proof that BO is eligible. What they are saying now is that, because there is no requirement to provide proof of eligibility in the state of Georgia, that there was never a need for any type of documentation, therefore it (documentation) is a moot point, and the image submitted into evidence by Apuzzo should be stricken.

  41. Whistleblower; not only that but Frawley has been given carte blanche to commit any crime he chooses…the Judge that signed off on Frawley vs. Weaver is Frawleys cousins brother-in-law Judge Madduxx…..you just can’t make this $h!t up…

  42. On air, it’s Obama vs. Paul

    Even some of Paul’s most die-hard supporters have begun to come around to the reality that this is probably the year he’ll win the Republican presidential nomination,

    By ALEXANDER BURNS |
    4/19/12 2:57 PM EDT

    As the political world girds for a general election match-up between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney, the airwaves are telling a different story: going by TV ads alone, you might think the campaign was between the president and Ron Paul.

    That’s because Mitt Romney pulled down his commercials after Rick Santorum dropped out of the Republican primary and Newt Gingrich can’t afford to spend money on paid media. That leaves only Paul shelling out cash on the Republican side, as Obama airs TV ads targeting Hispanic voters in several states.

    Paul is spending about $110,000 on commercials right now: $40,000 in Rhode Island, which holds its primary on Tuesday, and just under $71,000 on ads in Texas running April 23-29. He has already been up in Texas for days.

    Even some of Paul’s most die-hard supporters have begun to come around to the reality that this is probably the year he’ll win the Republican presidential nomination, but as long as some of those activists keep donating to the campaign, Paul may be able to maintain a baseline-level presence on TV.
    http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/04/on-air-its-obama-vs-paul-121062.html

  43. Okay BC,
    So… how great is that? Veterans, Jews, Christians, CIA, homosexuals, pastors, gun owners, etc. etc… all for Ron Paul! I guess he’s covered all the bases, right?
    How about regular citizens who just work their asses off to take care of their families and just want Obama to just go away… peacefully of course… maybe in handcuffs… but just leave us alone.
    These folks just identify themselves as Americans. Their tired of the division! They’re “neither male nor female, Jew nor Greek” to borrow a term from St. Paul , they are merely Americans. Something to be proud of. Something Reagan understood.
    Stop dividing us! Whether you’re BO or RP or MR. We’ve had enough! We’re Americans.
    That’s my rant, and I’m sticking by it!

  44. coldwarvet2 | April 19, 2012 at 7:37 pm ,
    They are upset about something that is for sure, good!

    They may be upset because they had planned on using the internet image for more fraud. Mario may have thrown a wrench into the gears, of their strategy to fool at least the Citizens of NJ with their BS.

  45. Philo-Publius

    Bob Strauss,
    Obama’s attorney did stipulate and agree that both the court and the Secretary of State could not rely on the internet birth certificate as evidence of Obama’s place of birth. She also stipulated that Obama has produced no other evidence to the court regarding his place of birth.

    All I am saying is that is not the same as admitting the BC is a forgery as some on our side have tried to portray her comments.

  46. Thanks to James for the Fox Chicago vid, Bessie for the Frawley news. hmmmm. and CW for your relentless spotlight and cross checking.

  47. Sue q
    FREEDOM IS POPULAR
    RON PAUL 2012

  48. Philo-Publius,
    Agreed, and you are right, they never stipulated the document was a forgery, just that they couldn’t use it as the campaign had designed.

    Sometimes the BS information is planted, to take away from the seriousness of the matter, paint birthers as rabid dogs, and for more obfuscation, their specialty.

  49. A Crazy Old Coot

    I have a small concern about the NJ case. Does it really matter if obama’s bc was admitted to be a fake or not? Normal citizens will never hear about it one way or another. The “so called” news media (to include Fox) will not report on it.

    Most of us on here know without a doubt that the bc is fake. But, that does not get it out to the general public.

    Just the opinion of a dumb ole (Natural Born Citizen) country boy.

  50. Diana West:

    “Is Obama disowning online birth certificate?”

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/04/is-obama-disowning-online-birth-certificate/

  51. Coot,
    I wish there was a way to flush out the phony media and their crooked ways.

    I feel like I am living in Nazi Germany when it comes to our propagandists in the cover, for the cover up media.

  52. bc | April 19, 2012 at 9:03 pm |

    Sue q
    FREEDOM IS POPULAR
    RON PAUL 2012
    —————————
    I must have failed to express myself adequately. Will have to take a different tack. Gee, I thought I was pretty straight forward though. Oh well.

  53. Philo
    What BO’s attorney could NOT stipulate to was that the BC was genuine. That would be fraud, and she knew it. Caught in a rhetorical dilemma, she chose ( her only viable choice) rather, to stipulate to the fact that BO had offered no evidentiary information to verify his eligibility and that the only evidence that had been offered was not reliable.
    There is still a use for the forgery in that, as jb has said, it is part of a political campaign and has never been certified as genuine by the Whitehouse, as “whitehouse.gov” is NOT an official government website (a red herring). You are correct in that what was said was not an admission of a forgery.

  54. bob strauss | April 19, 2012 at 9:21 pm |

    Coot,
    I wish there was a way to flush out the phony media and their crooked ways.

    I feel like I am living in Nazi Germany when it comes to our propagandists in the cover, for the cover up media.
    ****************************************************
    I wish Orly Taitz would include the media in her RICO suit, and subpoena all the liars in the media, and their phony proof of Obama’s eligibility.

  55. “Far-Left Huffington Post Crashes Ann Romney’s Birthday Party with Obama Eligibility Questions”

    “Huffington Post personality Adam Goldberg has learned that Americans still have numerous questions about Barack Obama, even after more than three years in the Oval Office, including doubts about his eligibility, his ability, and his faith.

    A video was posted today on the organization’s website where Goldberg questioned a number of people who were attending a fundraiser for possible GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney at New York’s Trump Tower.”

    [video at link]

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/04/far-left-huffington-post-crashes-ann.html

  56. Whistleblower

    MUST READ

    Sun Times’ report on Frawley sentencing in error

    http://illinoispaytoplay.com/2012/04/19/sun-times-report-on-frawley-sentencing-in-error/

  57. bob strauss
    Interesting you would bring that up as I have, as of late, spent a good deal of time thinking about that very thing (the media) and their complicity in the agenda of this administration. The key word is “agenda”. Is it illegal on it’s face, or is it merely unethical? Did it start out that way or has it rather morphed, so to speak, as they have progressively fabricated it?
    If there was a way to prove that there indeed was something illegal going on, and the media was complicit in it, there would appear to be a cause of action implicating at least the principals within the media sources involved. I personally could care less if the MSM is destroyed completely, as long as they can be made an example of by way of incurring serious sanctions for their involvement in a conspiracy of this magnitude.

  58. SueQ | April 19, 2012 at 9:22 pm |
    bc | April 19, 2012 at 9:03 pm |

    Sue q
    FREEDOM IS POPULAR
    RON PAUL 2012
    —————————
    I must have failed to express myself adequately. Will have to take a different tack. Gee, I thought I was pretty straight forward though. Oh well.
    *******************************
    SueQ, you expressed yourself VERY adequately the first time, and I have to agree with every word you said. I, too, am getting so tired of this constant drumbeat dividing Americans. That is exactly the modus operandi of the Usurper, and somehow it has become popular for conservatives to carry it forward regardless of the agenda.

  59. truthbetold11

    nothing is done because their all in the inner club. its like the firm you cant leave or else bad press or be killed

  60. While I had no idea someone was posting these interviews over here, I must respond to SueQ. The interviews are not meant to divide but are instead to counter the MSM portrayal that Ron Paul supporters are some how on the fringe rather than being from every walk of life; every ethnic origin; hard working family people just like you. If you think pointing out that the MSM has tried to dismiss Paul and his supporters as being fringe nut cases is somehow trying to divide Americans then I ask with the utmost respect what does that say about the way the MSM and GOP establishment treating “birthers” and those who challenged Obama’s eligibility as being far right wing nutcases?? If you had listened to any of the interviews you would have realized that each and every guest has pointed out that Paul and his supporters are more together than the so called GOP or Dems.

    Anyone here who somehow thinks the establishment and the medias efforts to marginalize and dismiss Paul, Pauls supporters or the Americans Elect.org group is going to help defeat Barack Obama in Nov is sadly mistaken.
    SueQ “These folks just identify themselves as Americans”

  61. Jerome Corsi:

    “Obama attorney: ‘Mickey Mouse’ could be on ballot”

    “Mickey Mouse could be placed as a candidate on the New Jersey Democratic Party presidential primary ballot, an attorney representing Barack Obama argued in court to support her claim that state law does not require Obama to prove he is eligible.

    At the hearing before New Jersey Administrative Law Judge Jeff S. Masin April 10, Hill maneuvered to avoid having to enter into evidence Obama’s long-form birth certificate the White House released nearly a year ago as proof Obama was born in Hawaii.

    Controversy over Hill’s arguments at the April 10 hearing began after various Internet posts erroneously reported that Hill stipulated during the hearing that the Obama long-form birth certificate was a forgery.

    What precisely Hill had stipulated was that the birth certificate had never been presented by Obama’s presidential campaign to the New Jersey secretary of state or to Judge Masin as evidence Obama was eligible to be president.

    What was clear viewing the three-hour hearing was that Hill waged a battle throughout to prevent being forced to submit the Obama birth certificate into evidence.”

    [videos at link]

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/04/obama-attorney-mickey-mouse-could-be-on-ballot/

  62. Gordo
    Good post…Corsi still doesn’t get it. The “Whitehouse” has never released the BC to te public as any kind of evidence. Whitehouse.gov is NOT a government website. Arpaio is the only person who may know who put the BC together, but has not informed the public. Because the law in NJ doesn’t require proof, the BC is moot. It was entered into evidence by the plaintiff.
    The fact that the Whitehouse lawyers want it quashed might be a red herring in itself. We can only speculate.

  63. coldwarvet2 | April 19, 2012 at 11:03 pm |
    Gordo
    Good post…Corsi still doesn’t get it. The “Whitehouse” has never released the BC to te public as any kind of evidence. Whitehouse.gov is NOT a government website.
    *******************************************
    No, but any reputable president would have repudiated the release of a fraudulent BC, regardless. His silence is deafening. I don’t think that informed Americans are going to give him a pass on that inconsistency.

  64. “GOOD THING the REPUBLICAN PARTY of TEXAS READS the “jbjd” BLOG”

    http://jbjd.org/2012/04/19/rpt-reads-jbjd-blog/

  65. jacqlynsmith

    cabbyaz | April 19, 2012 at 9:54 pm |

    SueQ | April 19, 2012 at 9:22 pm |
    bc | April 19, 2012 at 9:03 pm |

    Sue q
    FREEDOM IS POPULAR
    RON PAUL 2012
    —————————
    I must have failed to express myself adequately. Will have to take a different tack. Gee, I thought I was pretty straight forward though. Oh well.
    *******************************
    SueQ, you expressed yourself VERY adequately the first time, and I have to agree with every word you said. I, too, am getting so tired of this constant drumbeat dividing Americans. That is exactly the modus operandi of the Usurper, and somehow it has become popular for conservatives to carry it forward regardless of the agenda.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    LOL…you are the two dividing folks……most people are for PEACE and FREEDOM….there’s only one man running on that it’s NOT MITTENS….also….Dr. Paul is the most CONSERVATIVE candidate running…..how anyone can support a LIEberal like MITTENS or BO is beyond me but it seems that is what you two plan on doing!!

    bc is right FREEDOM is popular….that is why Dr. Paul is winning across the political spectrum…the only ones NOT supporting him are those of you who want to carry on the atrocities of WARMONGERING or WELFAREMONGERING….that needs to STOP….NEO CONS going down!

  66. BC – FREEDOM IS POPULAR
    RON PAUL 2012

    **********************************************************************************
    That is it in a nutshell.
    That is why I support Ron Paul. I am just an average person working my tail off to support my family & I just want to be left alone. That is also the reason why he appeals to such a diverse group of people from every spectrum.

    He would NEVER allow these freedoms to be taken away from us.

    By the way, have you heard how they took DNA from middle school students in Sacramento without parental consent & merely called it an “interview”? Things are ramping up & getting completely out of control.

  67. Cabby-
    With all due respect, by supporting Ron Paul I do not feel I am carrying on division. You need to understand that the reason Dr. Paul’s supporters are so passionate is because we cannot understand why others do not see that he is the only one advocating freedom & speaking out about the loss of it.
    We truly believe he is the best hope for restoring this nation.

    On the other hand, I feel the way some refer to Ron Paul supporters as “Paulites” is unacceptable. It seems like an Alinsky tactic. Why is okay for people to supprt other candidates without being given a nickname, i.e. Romneyites, Santorumites, or Gingrichites?

  68. MUST HEAR OUTSTANDING VIDEO!!!

    Daniel Jenky, Peoria Catholic Bishop: President Obama Following ‘A Similar Path’ As Hitler, Stalin (VIDEO)

    “A downstate Illinois Catholic bishop has come under fire after he said in a message at St. Mary’s Cathedral in Peoria that President Barack Obama is on “a similar path” as Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin.

    Roman Catholic Bishop Daniel Jenky of Peoria, according to the Right Wing Watch blog, likened Obama’s “radical, pro-abortion and extreme secularist agenda” as violating the First Amendment and proving the president’s “intent on following a similar path” as Hitler and Stalin in a Saturday address.

    Jenky went on to claim that American Catholics are currently in a “war” due to the Obama administration’s ruling on birth control and other issues:

    “May God have mercy especially on the souls of those politicians who pretend to be Catholic in church, but in their public lives, rather like Judas Iscariot, betray Jesus Christ by how they vote and how they willingly cooperate with intrinsic evil.”

    Article & Video Here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/19/daniel-jenky-peoria-catho_n_1438393.html

  69. I look at the main stream media today like a hamster in a cage……..

    “The wheel still turns but the hamster is dead”.

  70. From Orly Taitz’s site. She is trying to get Arpaio and Zullo involved in her case.

    Update:51 days since sheriff Arpaio’s press conference, still no report from Arpaio to the District Attorney for prosecution, still no consent from Arpaio or Zullo to testify in court. My case is the only one, where an answer was filed and discovery can be conducted. No discovery in any other Obama Forgery case around the nation. Don’t go by the hype, go by the truth and the factswww.orlytaitzesq.com

  71. “Alexandra M. Hill is not working on the case of Purpura and Moran v. Obama any longer. Angelo Genova has taken that case over and is handling it personally.”

    http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2012/04/18/firstamendment/obama-eligibility-media-pressure/
    =========
    Alexandra M. Hill:
    “Ms. Hill received her Juris Doctor from Georgetown University Law Center in 2011 … Ms. Hill served as an intern for the Camden County Democrat Committee.
    Practice areas:
    - Commercial Real Estate, Redevelopment & Environmental Law
    - Corporate Political Activity Law”

    http://obamaballotchallenge.com/new-jersey-hearing-obama-lawyer-says-obama-does-not-have-to-prove-eligibility-4102012

  72. legalinsurrection.com/2012/04/taking-over-the-institutions-just-like-saul-alinsky-wanted/

  73. cabbyaz | April 20, 2012 at 12:03 am |
    coldwarvet2 | April 19, 2012 at 11:03 pm |
    Gordo
    Good post…Corsi still doesn’t get it. The “Whitehouse” has never released the BC to te public as any kind of evidence. Whitehouse.gov is NOT a government website.
    *******************************************
    No, but any reputable president would have repudiated the release of a fraudulent BC, regardless. His silence is deafening. I don’t think that informed Americans are going to give him a pass on that inconsistency.
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Yes Cabby.

    Once again…..IF you folks can find a competent judge….tell it to the judge!

    Whenever the question of eligibility comes up the Obama representatives, including his official public relations representative, point to the posted form as evidence in order to stay any further inquiries. Even the pResident (as well as the HI officials) has directed the public to that form when they specifically discuss the man’s eligibility. All of those official speaks would be considered by any rational jury. Stop becoming the defense atty for zero…he has enough of them!

  74. coldwarvet2 | April 19, 2012 at 11:03 pm |

    Gordo
    Good post…Corsi still doesn’t get it. The “Whitehouse” has never released the BC to te public as any kind of evidence. Whitehouse.gov is NOT a government website. Arpaio is the only person who may know who put the BC together, but has not informed the public.
    ********************************************************************
    Neither Corsi nor Arpaio is doing you a favor by prolonging this charade.

    The images of President Obama’s birth certificate, whatever iteration, are only advertising copy, part of a paid political campaign. (Ask yourselves this question: given the controversy over his place of birth; why did it take until April 27, 2011, for the campaign to release the long form image indicating he was born in HI? Answer: Because the campaign for his 2012 re-election only began on April 4, 2011, and they couldn’t justify a campaign expenditure under the U.S. Code, without a campaign!)

    Please make sure you read this and the preceding few posts. (This is the last in the series but links to the other 3 articles are in there.) This explains everything, including the (cleverly misleading) statements about that launch, attributed to HI DoH officials.
    RECOGNIZING when the PEOPLE INVOLVED with the PRESS ROLLOUT of PRESIDENT OBAMA’S 2011 LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE AD CAMPAIGN WORE a PUBLIC v. PRIVATE HAT

  75. Attorney Kuligowski: Selective Service Forgery Alone is Enough to End Obama’s Presidency

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/04/atty-monte-kuligowski-selective-service.html

    April 19, 2012
    The Sea Change: Obama’s Confirmed Forgeries Are Not Going Away

    Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/04/the_sea_change_obamas_confirmed_forgeries_are_not_going_away.html#ixzz1sb2t5b2o

  76. How can someone born with Dual Citizenship be a natural born U.S citizen? One must be born with Sole Allegiance to the USA to be come President of my Father’s Country. That is the question needed to be asked of a Judge.

  77. bob strauss | April 20, 2012 at 10:12 am |

    From Orly Taitz’s site. She is trying to get Arpaio and Zullo involved in her case.

    Update:51 days since sheriff Arpaio’s press conference, still no report from Arpaio to the District Attorney for prosecution, still no consent from Arpaio or Zullo to testify in court. My case is the only one, where an answer was filed and discovery can be conducted. No discovery in any other Obama Forgery case around the nation. Don’t go by the hype, go by the truth and the facts orlytaitzesq.com
    ********************************************************************
    Nothing is illegal with respect to the so-called birth certificate: this is all a political advertising campaign.

    That’s why Boyd Richie, Chair of the TDP in TX, would rather admit, he only used Barack Obama’s application to get on the ballot, in TX, as the basis of his certification to the SoS, the candidate met the “federal” “qualifications” of office; than to submit a fake birth certificate and claim, this was the basis of his eligibility certification, Obviously, either way, there was no real basis on which to establish federal eligibility; but if that birth certificate image meant anything, surely, Richie would have used that to get himself off the hook!

  78. observer
    No one is defending BO…especially me. I do not defend communists. The confusion of the two sites is deliberate and a smoke screen. I was merely pointing that out. All I present here are facts…because some get the facts confused. It takes work and comprehension to get to the facts. Some people don’t like the facts.That is too bad, because it interferes with their objectivity and makes them frustrated.
    Once again to enlighten you, the major party election filing rules (which are on file) determine what is going to be required of a candidate to be on a ballot. Do the work and look it up, read it, and comprehend it. Presently, that is the law. Judges will follow the law. People here, and elsewhere, are continuing to try to fit the square peg in the round hole…over and over. Then they get frustrated and attack the messenger.
    The REAL problem, that has become more than evident, is that election laws, in all states, need to be standardized and changed.

  79. I’m not going to come here much anymore, to many political rants for politicians I don’t care for!!

  80. What happens when a company’s ‘advertising’ is shown to be false or misleading? Does it have an effect on the public’s opinion of the company? Have companies been severely damaged by deceiving the public – even if no laws were broken?

  81. GORDO | April 20, 2012 at 12:20 pm |

    What happens when a company’s ‘advertising’ is shown to be false or misleading? Does it have an effect on the public’s opinion of the company? Have companies been severely damaged by deceiving the public – even if no laws were broken?

    ****************************************************
    If no laws are broken then, file a civil suit for damages, if you think you have been harmed. (You will have a hard time crossing the threshold of establishing anyone would have taken campaign advertising seriously.) Or, you could look to a jurisdiction in which false advertising during a campaign is illegal.

    But unless you attack the ballot laws in the states; nothing else will prevent the President’s name from being printed on the ballot.

  82. Obama fears ‘The Court of Public Opinion’. It does not have to be about ‘THE LAW’.

  83. Just a word…

    I have been posting on CW’s blog for 4 years now. Usually, when I post an article on my blog which impacts eligibility, I make sure it is posted here. (Most often, I begin getting hits from this blog and see that someone has posted a link to my article; if not, I post here directly.) But other blogs, like FreeRepublic, do not allow me to post there. Now, what do you suppose would have been the results to the eligibility dilemma by this time, if the thousands, perhaps millions of readers there had access to this information that the on-line images of the President’s birth certificate, or the copies made of the mock-ups of those images, were all legal campaign advertising? Or that, when the press or pundits repeat the line, ‘The HI DoH posted the President’s birth certificate on their web the web site’; what really happened is, they linked to the whitehouse.gov blog image; and only listed that link, indented, under the line announcing HE HAD RELEASED THAT DOCUMENT (which, of course, he had!).

    I am asking all of you here to pass on the word, please. We can be as powerul as the MSM – at least on the internet.

    P.S. ‘Linda,’ a woman associated with that web site, ObamaBallotChallenge, had submitted a challenge in TX with the help of OBC. It went nowhere. She sent a copy of her documents to kjc, who was working with me to perfect the TX ballot challenge I had envisioned. (Unfortunately, we had to work under the radar, because experience had taught me, if I didn’t want my good work stolen and, thereby, rendered useless; I had to keep it a secret.) Well, Linda’s arguments to the SoS said, ‘Since Boyd Richie, Chair of the TDP, is not a public official, I cannot get whatever documents he used to ascertain Barack Obama’s ballot eligibility, from him.’ Of course, as I have been saying for years, under TX law, Mr. Richie is acting as a public official when he certifies names to the ballot. Thus, he is subject to TX Public Information laws. As the recent submission by the TDP to kjc proves, I was right. (Sadly, even though this first past of our project has gone public, people are still trying to make money off that work. kjc thought she would publicize the efforts in TX by posting on OBC. They took out all references to her or me, in their mass emailing advertising the comment. Then, they posted it under someone else’s by-line, putting their money link right below, so that people would think I – “jbjd” – was working with them, and by contributing to OBC and Article II Superpac, they were contributing to me! We – kjc and I – vigorously complained and they took down the comment. But think of how many people would have been informed of the FACTS if only OBC hadn’t tried to capitalize on our work!

  84. coldwarvet2 | April 20, 2012 at 12:10 pm |
    observer

    Once again to enlighten you, the major party election filing rules (which are on file) determine what is going to be required of a candidate to be on a ballot.
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Well, to “enlighten” you, you’re not very “enlightening”. We’ve heard that losing battle cry but we’re also enlightened by history itself that other means around a bought and paid for judiciary have had a more definite and sweeping effect to accomplish what your politically charged impossible process will never accomplish this late in the game. Right now there’s one other state approved to force voters to show IDs, but….they don’t have to prove they’re citizens! Ha! Yep those ballot laws will be really effective and without the ability to wrap some other fraud conveniently around the so called law!

    The REAL problem, that has become more than evident, is that election laws, in all states, need to be standardized and changed.

    Good luck with that when conservatives want states to settle their own questions…not the feds forcing things. When the states can’t even protect themsevles against terrorizing illegals on their borders I doubt if such political questions within the populace of differing states will be so easily managed.

    FORGERYGATE: DEMAND A SPECIAL COUNSEL APPOINTMENT

    http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd531.htm

  85. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    Spiritual Angel Of God | April 19, 2012 at 10:09 am |

    Naomi Wolf: [Ten key steps to close down an open society: a dictator's blueprint]

    1. Invoke an internal and external threat
    2. Secret prisons where torture takes place
    3. Develop a paramilitary force
    4. Surveillance of ordinary citizens
    5. Infiltrate citizens’ groups
    6. Detain and release ordinary citizens
    7. Target key individuals
    8. Restrict the press
    9. Recast criticism as espionage and dissent as treason
    10. Subvert the rule of law

    __________________________________________

    YOU LEFT OUT # 11

    “The last official act of any government is the looting of the treasury.” – George Washington

  86. Why are the mainstream media so absolutely giddy when they discover something like the oldest known portrait of a transvestite? What is driving this agenda? It is truly bizarre. MSNBC seems really proud to be covering this story. Why? This is so strange.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/47117012/ns/technology_and_science-science/

  87. coldwarvet2 | April 19, 2012 at 11:03 pm |
    The “Whitehouse” has never released the BC to the public as any kind of evidence. Whitehouse.gov is NOT a government website.

    From dotgov.gov:

    Currently Domain WHITEHOUSE.GOV is not available for Registration.
    Agency : Executive Office of the President
    Organization : White House
    Domain Name : WHITEHOUSE.GOV
    Status : ACTIVE

    From data.gov:

    https://explore.data.gov/Federal-Government-Finances-and-Employment/Federal-Executive-Branch-Internet-Domains/k9h8-e98h

    Agency: Executive Office of the President

  88. Jeff,

    Photocopies of both Obama’s COLB and LFBC were given to the press at the White House. These hard copies were presented in the White House at the request and in the presence of Barrack Obama. This did not occur on the campaign trail at some liberal university. I’m no legal expert but wouldn’t campaigning in the White House be a violation of federal election laws?…..

    Obama Birth Certificate Released By White House
    “Many members of the press confessed to being “stunned” as it became clear what was about to be discussed. White House press assistants handed out a six-page stapled packet of photocopies showing the new and old birth certificates as well as the White House’s legal correspondence with Hawaii’s Department of Health”.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/27/obama-birth-certificate-r_n_854248.html

  89. Is Obama disowning online birth certificate?

    “Judith Corley, the president’s personal attorney, flew to Hawaii. She went there to pick up two certified copies of the president’s long-form birth certificate from the Hawaii Department of Health.
    At least, that’s what then-White House Counsel Robert Bauer told us last April 27 at a White House press briefing called to unveil the new, certified document. Multiple copies were passed out to the press, ”

    “The curious fact is, President Obama’s attorney, Alexandra Hill, couldn’t have been more adamant about not citing the online birth certificate as a means of proving the president’s identity in this recent challenge – and after everyone went to so much trouble to get it! Indeed, she called the Internet image “legally irrelevant,” arguing that New Jersey law doesn’t specifically call for a birth certificate to qualify a presidential candidate for the ballot”.

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/04/is-obama-disowning-online-birth-certificate/

  90. Jeff and Jonah,

    Great posts! These are my sentiments exactly.

    Way too much emphasis is being placed on splitting hairs, IF there are truly hairs to be split.

    Obama may have tried to keep his hands clean re. the BC’s, but the truth remains, he set that presentation forth as a bona fide document.

    Dance all over it, if someone wishes, but he is guilty of fraud, either directly or indirectly.

    Why are some trying so hard to so-called “set the record straight”?

  91. jacqlynsmith

    Nancy Drew……EXCELLENT comments!

  92. To JBJD;

    RE your posting:

    <>

    That is an outright lie, as I wrote you and your cohort….

    1. The initiator’s name kcjcanon) was placed at the bottom, showing authorship.
    2, The message was published intact, as received, with all your web links.
    3. My name was only the poster’s, as all Worpress blog postings are
    4. We place an ad for the Article II Superpac Legal Fund and Constitution Action Fund at the bottom of nearly every posting we do. That is similar to what many other bloggers do. In any case, not a penny of funds collected goes to anyone at Obamaballotchallenge.com. In fact, we have contributed thousands of dollars of our OWN money to eligibility causes and many, many hours of our time, with no compensation.
    5. Both Article II and Constitution Action Fund are non-profits, with stringent accounting. Pamela and I were involved in the start-up of Article II, but are no longer connected with it, as we now focus on ballot challenges. We are both on the board of Constitution Action Fund, which is fairly new. So far, funds have only been disbursed to one attorney, one press conference and an advertisement.

    Your apology is in order.

    I was pleased to hear that a court challenge was filed, since both Pamela and I submitted separate TX SOS administrative complaints, to no avail.

  93. Jeff M
    Thanks for the update…Allow me to reference (and you’re going to hate this) jbjd’s blog topic dated March 29, 2012..There is so much at that site it just boggles the mind but, additionally, it is far too much to print here and jbjd should get the credit. She did all the digging, I just remembered where it was.
    Whitehouse.gov is merely a blog. All the clarification is there.

  94. Blog or no blog, whitehouse.GOV is owned by the federal government, paid for by the federal government, and is a representation of the federal government.

    They may try to distance the site from the federal government, but the fact remains. All content on the site is the legal, financial, political, and historical responsibility of the Executive Office of the President. If items are not factual or legal they should be removed from the site. Otherwise they are libel for its content and are held fully accountable.

  95. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    Meanwhile back at the Raunch – This will flap your doodle!

    “FIRED SECRET SERVICE AGENT REMAINS ELIGIBLE FOR UP TO $2.1 MILLION IN TAXPAYER-FUNDED PENSION PAYOUT”

    Now get this :

    His father was a Secret Service Agent.
    The Gubmint will now go and hire another agent which means we will be paying the fired agents retirement and funding and paying for the new agent, who when he retires we have to etc.,etc,etc.

    REMEMBER -

    “The last official act of any government is the looting of the treasury.” – George Washington

    http://freebeacon.com/pley-money-2/

  96. Jeff M.
    Did you actually read the content at jbjd?

  97. You’re right JEFF M. Of course JBJD is misguided (or maybe lying again). As usual she is whining that she “had the idea first”, and people are “stealing her ideas”. The fact is that http://www.whitehouse.gov is an official site of the US government, and is listed as such at http://www.usa.gov

    http://search.usa.gov/search?affiliate=usagov&query=white+house&USA.gov+Search.x=32&USA.gov+Search.y=25

    “Official Site
    The White House

    http://www.whitehouse.gov

    Official White House site presents issue positions, news, Cabinet, appointments, offices and major speeches. Includes biography, video tour and photo essays.”

    http://www.usa.gov/About.shtml
    About USA.gov

    “As the U.S. government’s official web portal, USA.gov makes it easy for the public to get U.S. government information and services on the web. ”

    “USA.gov is an interagency initiative administered by the Federal Citizen Information Center, a division of the U.S. General Services Administration’s Office of Citizen Services and Innovative Technologies. It got its start when Internet entrepreneur Eric Brewer, whose early research was funded by the Department of Defense, offered to donate a powerful search engine to government. That gift helped accelerate the government’s earlier work to create a government-wide portal.”

    So the US government’s official web portal, established by the GSA, says that http://www.whitehouse.gov is the official government White House site. That makes it more than an “advertisment”, and JBJD is FOS. Maybe that’s why Obama;s lawyers are trying to get film of the NJ ballot hearing w/ Mario Appuzo censored!!! Their lawyer just admitted that the BC they have posted there has no evidentiary value!

  98. coldwarvet2 | April 20, 2012 at 4:22 pm |
    Jeff M.
    Did you actually read the content at jbjd?
    *******************************
    You did not direct your question to me, but I have to say I did read it when first available and scanned it again. It was not convincing to me on the CRUCIAL issues. Just because an attorney comes up with an interpretation that fits a certain framework doesn’t mean it is completely credible. Just my two cents’ worth, but what do I know? (I’ve only been around a few years more than most)

  99. George Miller, Obamaballotchallenge.com | April 20, 2012 at 2:53 pm |

    To JBJD (sic);
    **************************************************
    You did what you did.

    In respose to kjc’s submission, you generated your mass mailing summarizing its contents. Naturally, you included a link to your blog for the ‘whole’ story. However, you also edited out both her moniker and mine. The actual posting on your blog, appeared under your byline, at the top, with a link to you. Yes, at tne end of kjc’s blurb about our work; indented, with a hyphen, in regular typeface, you had retained, “- kjcanon.” I missed that indented type the first time I looked at the posted comment, I figured, that was the point of putting it there.

    Incidentally, around the same time, you posted an excerpt from Orly. Only, at the bottom of that summary was a line directing readers to read more on her blog, complete with her blog address.

    That said, thank you for removing the offensive post.

  100. coldwarvet2 | April 20, 2012 at 4:22 pm |

    Jeff M.
    Did you actually read the content at jbjd?

    Yes I did. And I couldn’t disagree more with the argument. Whitehouse.gov is a GOVernment site running on a domain housed on GOVernment servers in the GOVernment capital of Washington D.C. serving the Executive Office of the President of the United States. Domain name servers are sending users to the blog, which means the use of that site is governed by the Office of Integrated Technology Services. Additionally, the whitehouse.GOV blog is moderated by White House staff, who are Executive Branch employees hired to manage the content approved by the Office of the President. It is an extension of communication the Office is conveying to everyone in the nation. Akamai or no Akamai, government employees have linked the blog to the registered domain for the sole intent of using it as a communications vehicle to the world. Now, it would be quite different if it was whitehouse.gov.blogspot.com or something completely separated. When they do this, they are required to place a disclaimer and a springboard page indicating they are leaving the domain, aka the governing realm of the Federally-governed site. GSA is very specific about fair use and compliance with proper name registrations for this very reason.

    Obama had to have approved the forgery, through direct allowance or indirect inaction. The forgery was reported to them by another government agency, yet they took no action. Any court dumb enough to believe the argument that a blog makes it any less relevant that a digital piece of toilet paper is not legitimate because it is on Akamai instead of government servers should be shut down and the doors boarded up.

    Semantics aside, I’ll stick with the technical and legal registrar compliance requirements, and not water down things with a lot of “theoretical” mumbo jumbo. Then again it wouldn’t surprise me all the courts will accept this waste of digital space as legitimate, yet not legitimate at the same time.

  101. coldwarvet2 | April 20, 2012 at 2:56 pm |

    Jeff M
    Thanks for the update…Allow me to reference (and you’re going to hate this) jbjd’s blog topic dated March 29, 2012..There is so much at that site it just boggles the mind but, additionally, it is far too much to print here and jbjd should get the credit. She did all the digging, I just remembered where it was.
    Whitehouse.gov is merely a blog. All the clarification is there.
    ***********************************************************************
    coldwarvet2,

    I am so glad you ‘get’ it. ‘Agreeing’ with me, “jbjd,” is irrelevant, even though, as your disclaimer acknowledges, people too often ignore the work because of some animus toward the person who produced it and not based on any factors directly related to the quality of that work.

    No; what matters is understanding the way our government was designed to function, and not the way you wish it worked. First, look at the Constitution. If the conduct is not there; it’s not ‘official.’

    Clearly, the President is not required under the Constitution to regularly update the people directly as to what the Executive branch is up to, whether through an internet web site, except insofar as “HE SHALL FROM TIME TO TIME GIVE TO THE CONGRESS>/i> INFORMATION OF THE STATE OF THE UNION…
    http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articleii

  102. citizenwells

    *** To all ***

    Passion for what you believe in is good.
    I am beside you on that.
    Strong disagreement is ok.
    Back off on the character attacks, etc.
    Unless of course it is BO who has none.

  103. dualer | April 20, 2012 at 5:00 pm |

    You’re right JEFF M.

    Thanks dualar. I’m not insinuating jbjd is lying. I’m merely referencing that the point that was made would not apply to subdomains or virtual domains of a federal GOVernment web site.

    It may apply in other references, but certainly not here. One prime example is the IRS.gov’s reference to external filing companies who offer free filing services but are clearly not a part nor managed under the regulation of the federal government. They place disclaimers everywhere to keep the two distinct and separate.

    In this case of a blog, employees are posting information of an Executive and government nature to those outside of the office. It is an extension of the Press Secretary activities within the Office of the President of United States. The office does not need an address to the union to communicate to the public with regards to official business. And the office is certainly complicit in releasing any information to the public from any of their domains they control.

  104. Everyone,

    You keep missing the fine points about what is ‘official’ conduct. Rest assured, the people intentionally misleading you, do not.

    Any postings with respect to the release of the President’s long form birth certificate appear on the ‘official’ “White House.Blog,” address WhiteHouse.gov/blog.

    If you don’t understand this; it is not the fault of the people taking advantage of your knowledge deficit.

  105. JeffM
    Thanks for the response…and you too jbjd..I am beginning to feel the limits of my expertise in this argument, as I am sure you are already aware, so I will defer to you experts. Glad I could at least be somewhat of a catalyst. I feel the points in this area will be significant as time moves these technical arguments to the forefront.

  106. There is a point I would like make in the wake of this most recent exchange.
    The point jbjd is making with regard to those of us engaged in this spirited argument on the fine points of what constitutes fraud is valid (especially her 6:21 post). There are indeed those actively engaged in deception regarding the authenticity of BO’s credentials. The more refined point would be whether or not that deception constitutes an actionable fraud…and how to prove it.
    What is happening in all the lawsuits reflects the ancient axiom that “the burden of proof lies with the accuser”…regardless of the complexity of the case. The court of public opinion will ultimately end up at the polls where it should, but it will never prevail in a court of law. It is the distinction between the two points that needs to be spelled out here for the benefit of all who frequent this site.
    jbjd is correct in that it is not those involved in the manipulation who are at fault as, in an onerous sort of way, it is their job. To be forewarned is to be forearmed, and a public which is at least educated in a basic way, as to avoid distortion of the facts, can indeed be a formidable weapon in the court of public opinion.

  107. If we are to measure conduct …not only has the original conduct been acknowledged as representative of the truth of fact…as has been done by official representatives of the pRes as well as himself as well as appointed HI officials, and this pointedly to the info on the assumed official site, but we have related new conduct re: the “advertisement” which has been to acknowledge probative use of the original “proof” of eligibility and its examination to the point of replacing the original with a now scanned product that cannot be separated into layers. This is conduct denying the rationale of the original conduct as being only campaign “advertising”. If there was no risk involved in that conduct/simple “advertisment”, why the acknowledgement that it was nothing of the sort of such innocent activity by altering the information originally posted and without the explanation to the public or apology for false “advertising”?????

    One of the main foundations for removing a domain name from use by the owners of record is when it is used in order to confuse the public….esp. while using the official name that is already established in the mind of the public as something to be representative of the truth to the public of what is placed upon it. There is also a question of copyright abuse.

  108. Thank you dear Cabby, for coming to my defence. I am just so sick of those that devide us. Whether it is Obama or Romney or Paul.

    We are Americans.

  109. coldwarvet2 | April 20, 2012 at 6:57 pm |

    There is a point I would like make in the wake of this most recent exchange.
    The point jbjd is making with regard to those of us engaged in this spirited argument on the fine points of what constitutes fraud is valid (especially her 6:21 post). There are indeed those actively engaged in deception regarding the authenticity of BO’s credentials. The more refined point would be whether or not that deception constitutes an actionable fraud…and how to prove it.
    What is happening in all the lawsuits reflects the ancient axiom that “the burden of proof lies with the accuser”…regardless of the complexity of the case. The court of public opinion will ultimately end up at the polls where it should, but it will never prevail in a court of law. It is the distinction between the two points that needs to be spelled out here for the benefit of all who frequent this site.
    jbjd is correct in that it is not those involved in the manipulation who are at fault as, in an onerous sort of way, it is their job. To be forewarned is to be forearmed, and a public which is at least educated in a basic way, as to avoid distortion of the facts, can indeed be a formidable weapon in the court of public opinion.
    *********************************************************************************
    Ditto. And thank you.

    The only fraud which I have always maintained is actionable; is the fraud that consists of swearing to a candidate’s (federal) eligibility in a ballot eligibility state with no documentary evidence to support such certification, when the candidate’s eligibility has already been publicly called in question. That’s why I have been saying for years, ‘if you were unable to find any documentary evidence available in the public domain that Barack Obama is Constitutionally qualified for the job; then on what basis did those D party officials, who swore to state election officials he was eligible; determine that was the truth?

  110. observer | April 20, 2012 at 6:59 pm |

    If we are to measure conduct …not only has the original conduct been acknowledged as representative of the truth of fact…as has been done by official representatives of the pRes as well as himself as well as appointed HI officials,
    ************************************************************
    The HI officials actually did not say what you think they said, if you look carefully at their official web site. Instead, they said, ‘This is what the President said (we said), and here are links to everything he said (we said), and to the long form birth certificate. All of those documents linked, except one, takes you to the document STORED ON THE HI DoH SERVER. But one document linked takes you to the WH.gov.blog, stored on the WH server. Guess which document is not stored on the HI DoH server? Yep; that long form birth certificate. Know why? Because if it was stored on the HI DoH server, it would be subject to mandatory disclosure under a public records request! A public records request of those other documents would get you those documents, which, as the DoH stated, are what Obama released! This does not mean, either the President or the DoH has explicitly claimed, the DoH actually wrote them!

    RECOGNIZING when the PEOPLE INVOLVED with the PRESS ROLLOUT of PRESIDENT OBAMA’S 2011 LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE AD CAMPAIGN WORE a PUBLIC v. PRIVATE HAT

  111. A Crazy Old Coot

    So, to get my thoughts stright, if Mr. obama writes a letter to the editor of a newspaper, it would not be an official communiction. Is that correct? Because the WH site would be the same as a letter to the editor of a newspaper. In other words, the only official communication from the WH would be at a state of the union address or a joint session of congress.

    Therefore anything can be placed on a blog and it would not be official. Would that include threats? On a blog they would not be official, so how can anyone be held responsible for a threat on a blog?

  112. jbjd
    At the end of the day, it is exceedingly simple, but perhaps not all that pallatable. I believe you have found the Achilles Heel of this particular political machine.
    It is a very scary thing to suddenly realize your very way of life has become threatened by those entrusted with your security. The drowning person will latch on to anything that floats.

  113. coldwarvet2 | April 20, 2012 at 8:53 pm |

    jbjd
    At the end of the day, it is exceedingly simple, but perhaps not all that pallatable. I believe you have found the Achilles Heel of this particular political machine.
    It is a very scary thing to suddenly realize your very way of life has become threatened by those entrusted with your security. The drowning person will latch on to anything that floats.
    *********************************************************
    I also think, on any site, are paid ‘disinformers.’ Add to that, many people have made a lot of money exploiting the gullibility of those who are less informed, and have a financial stake in prolonging such ignorance.

    I have my trusty PayPal button; and even Politijab (now fogbow) made fun of how few times it gets pushed. (I still cannot figure out how they get that information!) (Then again, that site spent page after page ridiculing me for saying, Boyd Richie was a public official. Because in the law, the definition of “public official” does not include state political party chairs. Of course, they forgot to look at the section on ‘state party chairs.’ That’s where they would have seen what I saw, namely, when the party chair performs a traditionally public act, like submitting names to the ballot; s/he is a public official for the purpose of obtaining public records, subject to mandamus! And, by obtaining from Mr. Richie, President Obama’s application to the 2012 TX primary ballot; I guess I established, my interpretation of the law, was right.)

  114. The more refined point would be whether or not that deception constitutes an actionable fraud…and how to prove it.
    What is happening in all the lawsuits reflects the ancient axiom that “the burden of proof lies with the accuser”…regardless of the complexity of the case.

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    But that evidence has been argued and the court itself ordered a defense against such only to be shown contempt for its own warning and then followed up by actually becoming the defense against the already legitimately recognized accusers instead of following lawful procedures. And this has happened more than once. The burden upon the accuser has been and is being answered. It has been illicit responses by judges that has caused the never ending attempts for justice….not some reorganizing of the facts in order to place an over the top burden upon the accusers here that is and has been the problem. To not recognize that fact is to cowardly become assets to the corruption. You’ve fallen victim to their traps and swallowed their kool aid after inadvertently joining their cult. Blame the accusers rather than the blatant immoral and unethical actions of the appointees of justice. tsk tsk!

  115. Regardless of what is stored on the HI DoH server the excuse for not answering requests for records has always been that the individual must give permission and yet said officials have expressed a rather explicit description of such form, not to any private formal request, but to the public at large and without any legitimate reason for doing so which information itself denies
    that which all parties prefer by their actions to let stand as is presented to
    the public. All of these actions and expressed wording could certainly be presented as contradicting evidence before a court or a jury once the main problem of illicit judicial blocking is solved via an accountable and competent jurist.

  116. JBJD said,

    “Everyone,

    You keep missing the fine points about what is ‘official’ conduct. Rest assured, the people intentionally misleading you, do not.

    Any postings with respect to the release of the President’s long form birth certificate appear on the ‘official’ “White House.Blog,” address WhiteHouse.gov/blog.

    If you don’t understand this; it is not the fault of the people taking advantage of your knowledge deficit.”
    ————————————————————————————–

    More circular firing squad nonsense. http://www.whitehouse.gov is the OFFICIAL WH portal, as said so by USA.gov, which is administered by the GSA. Therefore everything , all content uploaded to that site, including the “blog” is official US government content.

  117. Philo-Publius

    LIBERTY LEGAL FOUNDATION,)JOHN DUMMETT,)LEONARD VOLODARSKY, and)CREG MARONEY
    ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND

    …it is clear that the stated federal issue of President Obama’s qualifications for the office are “actually disputed and substantial.” There is a sharp dispute in this case over Plaintiff’s main contention that President Obama is not a natural born citizen and is otherwise disqualified from the office under the United States Constitution. It is also clear that there will be a legal dispute over the Constitution’s definition of “natural born citizen” and the Supreme Court’s decision in Minor.

    …The Court finds it self-evident that an individual’s ability to meet the constitutional qualifications to serve as President of the United States, particularly where the individual already holds the office, ranks as a “significant federal issue.” Second, the Court finds that resolution of this federal issue will resolve the case. As previously discussed, Plaintiffs have “staked their claim” on the issue of whether President Obama can satisfy the constitutional requirements for the office. Finally, the outcome of the federal question in this case will certainly have an effect on other cases presenting the same issue about whether President Obama meets the constitutional qualifications for the Presidency. This specific question has been raised in numerous lawsuits filed since President Obama took office. Under the circumstances, there is a risk of inconsistent adjudications on the federal issue presented. Taken together, these factors establish that the federal issue in this case is substantial.
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/89282762/TN-2012-04-13-LLF-ORDER-Denying-Motion-to-Remand

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s