Obama Romney third debate, Obama Benghazi lies, Obama takes credit for Osama Bin Laden but worked against efforts, Navy Seals did job Obama delayed

Obama Romney third debate, Obama Benghazi lies, Obama takes credit for Osama Bin Laden but worked against efforts, Navy Seals did job Obama delayed

“With some trying to turn bin Laden’s death into a campaign talking point for Obama’s reelection, it is useful to remember that the trail to bin Laden started in a CIA black site — all of which Obama ordered closed, forever, on the second full day of his administration — and stemmed from information obtained from hardened terrorists who agreed to tell us some (but not all) of what they knew after undergoing harsh but legal interrogation methods. Obama banned those methods on Jan. 22, 2009.”…Jose A. Rodriguez Jr. 31 year CIA veteran 

“But Crowley and Obama had it wrong. the Post’s Glenn Kessler explained:

What did Obama say in the Rose Garden a day after the attack in Libya? ”No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this nation,” he said.
But he did not say “terrorism”—and it took the administration days to concede that that it an “act of terrorism” that appears unrelated to initial reports of anger at a video that defamed the prophet Muhammad.”…Washington Post Oct. 17, 2012

“And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed
–if all records told the same tale–then the lie passed into
history and became truth. “Who controls the past,” ran the
Party slogan, “controls the future: who controls the present
controls the past.”…George Orwell, “1984″

The third debate between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney takes place tonight, October 22, 2012 at 9:00 PM. The focus will be foreign policy.

Obama has a problem. The lies he and his administration told about the terrorist attack at Benghazi. He will predictably respond with Orwellian damage control.

There is a consensus that Obama will continue to brag about killing Osama Bin Laden. However, the only thing that Obama can take credit for is not delaying the operation further by giving the order.

Let’s be clear. The Navy Seals risked all and deserve most of the credit.

A new book claims that

“Obama ‘cancelled missions to kill bin Laden THREE TIMES after getting cold feet – until Hillary Clinton stepped in’”

“Barack Obama cancelled three operations to kill Osama bin Laden before finally going ahead with the mission at the insistence of Hillary Clinton, according to a new book.

The explosive allegation is contained in an expose by journalist Rich Miniter, who argues that the White House’s carefully-crafted narrative of Obama as a decisive leader who dispatched the al-Qaeda leader despite the doubts of advisers is a myth.

Leading from Behind: The Reluctant President and the Advisors Who Decide for Him will be published on Tuesday. Excerpts have been viewed by Mail Online.

Miniter, a former ‘Wall Street Journal’, ‘Washington Times’ and ‘Sunday Times’ of London journalist, cites an unnamed source within Joint Special Operations Command as revealing that three ‘kill’ missions were cancelled by Obama in January, February and March 2011.

Bin Laden was eventually killed by US Navy SEALs inside his compound in Abbotobad, Pakistan in May 2011.”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2191021/EXCLUSIVE-Obama-cancelled-missions-kill-bin-Laden-THREE-TIMES-getting-cold-feet–Hillary-Clinton-stepped-claims-explosive-new-book.html

The search for Bin Laden began years before Obama took office.

“The CIA was able to find him by tracking a courier.  This was a process that took years.  It actually began during the Bush Administration — in 2007.  How did the Intelligence Community find the courier who eventually took them to bin Laden?  They found him through information gained from interrogating terrorist prisoners.

Let’s repeat that point because it needs to be emphasized.  Ultimately, bin Laden was found and killed as a result of information gained from the interrogation of a captured terrorist.  Actually, given all of the ink and pixels that have been spilled over this subject, it bears repeating one more time: bin Laden’s death is a direct result of information gained from the interrogation of detainees, reportedly at the famed Guantanamo Bay prison camp.”

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/05/bin_ladens_death_and_the_vindi.html

From the Washington Post April 30, 2012.

“The path to bin Laden’s death didn’t start with Obama”

“As we mark the anniversary of Osama bin Laden’s death, President Obama deserves creditfor making the right choice on taking out Public Enemy No. 1.But his administration never would have had the opportunity to do the right thing had it not been for some extraordinary work during the George W. Bush administration. Much of that work has been denigrated by Obama as unproductive and contrary to American principles.

He is wrong on both counts.

Shortly after bin Laden met his maker last spring, courtesy of U.S. Special Forces and intelligence, the administration proudly announced that when Obama took office, getting bin Laden was made a top priority. Many of us who served in senior counterterrorism positions in the Bush administration were left muttering: “Gee, why didn’t we think of that?”The truth is that getting bin Laden was the top counterterrorism objective for U.S. intelligence since well before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. This administration built on work pain­stakingly pursued for many years before Obama was elected — and without this work, Obama administration officials never would have been in a position to authorize the strike on Abbottabad, Pakistan, that resulted in bin Laden’s overdue death.In 2004, an al-Qaeda terrorist was captured trying to communicate with Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the leader of the terror organization’s operations in Iraq. That captured terrorist was taken to a secret CIA prison — or “black site” — where, initially, he was uncooperative. After being subjected to some “enhanced interrogation techniques” — techniques authorized by officials at the most senior levels of the U.S. government and that the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel confirmed were consistent with U.S. law — the detainee became compliant. He was not one of the three al-Qaeda operatives who underwent waterboarding, the harshest of the hard measures.

Once this terrorist decided that non-cooperation was a non-starter, he told us many things — including that bin Laden had given up communicating via telephone, radio or Internet, and depended solely on a single courier who went by “Abu Ahmed al-Kuwaiti.” At the time, I was chief of the CIA’s Counterterrorism Center. The fact that bin Laden was relying on a lone courier was a revelation that told me bin Laden had given up day-to-day control of his organization. You can’t run an operation as large, complex and ambitious as al-Qaeda by communicating only every few months. It also told me that capturing him would be even harder than we had thought.

Armed with the pseudonym of bin Laden’s courier, we pressed on. We asked other detainees in our custody if they had ever heard of “al-Kuwaiti.” Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the mastermind of 9/11, reacted in horror when he heard the name. He backed into his cell and vigorously denied ever hearing of the man. We later intercepted communications KSM sent to fellow detainees at the black site, in which he instructed them: “Tell them nothing about the courier!”

In 2005 another senior detainee, Abu Faraj al-Libi, told us that this courier had informed him that Libi had been selected to be al-Qaeda’s No. 3 official. Surely that kind of information is delivered only by highly placed individuals.

A couple of years later, after I became head of the National Clandestine Service, the CIA was able to discover the true name of the courier. Armed with that information, the agency worked relentlessly to locate that man. Finding him eventually led to tracking down and killing bin Laden.

With some trying to turn bin Laden’s death into a campaign talking point for Obama’s reelection, it is useful to remember that the trail to bin Laden started in a CIA black site — all of which Obama ordered closed, forever, on the second full day of his administration — and stemmed from information obtained from hardened terrorists who agreed to tell us some (but not all) of what they knew after undergoing harsh but legal interrogation methods. Obama banned those methods on Jan. 22, 2009.”

This past weekend, Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Carl Levin attacked statements made in May 2011 by me, former CIA director Michael Hayden and former attorney general Michael Mukasey regarding what led to bin Laden’s death. They misunderstood and mischaracterized our positions.

No single tactic, technique or approach led to the successful operation against bin Laden. But those who suggest it was all a result of a fresh approach taken after Jan. 20, 2009, are mistaken.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-path-to-osama-bin-ladens-death-didnt-start-with-obama/2012/04/30/gIQAfFmdsT_story.html

About these ads

72 responses to “Obama Romney third debate, Obama Benghazi lies, Obama takes credit for Osama Bin Laden but worked against efforts, Navy Seals did job Obama delayed

  1. I’ll be very disappointed if no one (moderator or Romney) puts the question to Zero about what he meant when he sent the message to Putin about his willingness to be “more flexible” to the desires of Russia….and how that message was applauded with the reply from the Russians that “we are with you”. Specifically, is this about the complete destruction of our military which is the MAIN goal of that strong enemy of ours? How could they forget about that? THAT’S foreign policy that could carry over to fulfillment if this dangerous man gets another 4 years.

  2. Every time barky opened his mouth, a lie spewed out; amazing! I was yelling at the TV.

    Mitt needed to really nail him on Benghazi and didn’t take that opportunity, but I feel his message was a lot better than barky’s; he was out of gas, like he was just throwing in the towel. A beaten fighter.

    I also noticed barky’s eyelids blinking like a strobe light; wonder what he was on tonight. He looked like the walking dead. Mitt looked like the incumbent rather than the challenger, and barky looked like an amateur community organizer running for the city council for the first time.

    Tonight, we saw President Mitt Romney.

  3. Observer,
    I did catch Romney referring to Zero’s statement (open mike re. being
    “more flexible” after he was reelected), but he did not make as much of it as desirable, imho. However, in retrospect my thoughts are that Romney is a very smart person, and I trust his judgment as to exactly the tone he wanted to set. His goal seemed clear: To be under complete control, measure his rebuttals, and maintain a steady, level approach that could not be misconstrued.

    Strategically Romney did exactly what he had to do – look capable of being able lead the country and convey that he is well-informed in all aspects of foreign affairs. He also got a number of excellent points thrown in on the economy. As Charles Krauthammer said, Obama looked very petty at times. I think that he acted rudely and at times gazed at the moderator as though waiting for some sort of previously agreed-upon help.

  4. …….and now,Soetoro once again torpedoed himself…….”US no longer uses horses,and bayonets”……….a marine tweeted in and said”somebody doesn’t know much about the military”……..”we do STILL USE BAYONETS”. Nothing like a Biden sort of brain fart. Do you suppose Soetoro is really “BEHIND” Biden so much that some of Biden is actually “RUBBING OFF”?

  5. SueK | October 22, 2012 at 10:52 pm |
    Hi, SueK!
    Tonight, we saw President Mitt Romney.
    ************************
    Yeah, I agree 100% ! (more than 100%)

  6. I believe that Romney came away the winner of the debate. But then you still must make the OBOTS understand fact from FANCY. In their little FANTASY WORLDS only Soetoro exists. Boy are they going to get a shock on November 6.

  7. Suek,and CabbyAZ
    I second the 100%. Time for me to go home! G’NITE ALL, Godbless.

  8. Oldsailor,
    Good to hear your thoughts! I wouldn’t be surprised if horses aren’t sometimes used, also, in certain situations. What a jerk we heard tonight!
    (I’m referring to Soetoro, not the President, which office seems to have been usurped.) Soetoro came off as a petty, small man, while Romney maintained his stature, making S appear all the smaller and insignificant.

    I am wondering what The Donald is going to reveal on Wed. He said it could change the election dramatically. He has been sort of a “flash in a pan” at times in the past, but maybe not now.

  9. Fact checkers have already called soetero out for mispeaking! Romney did well! I would have preferred more on Libya and Israel positions but understand it was Romney’s plan to stay above the fray.

  10. Romney was solid as usual. Obama held his own. Nothing will change in the polls, at least not in Obama’s favor. It looks like the margin is pretty set until election day, with Romney holding the edge. It will be interesting to see what Donald Trump has to say on Wednesday.

  11. Before I go home there is one other little fact that is really a big problem for Soetoro, since he never legally changed his name back to Obama, he is not even legally the POTUS. He is legally Barry Soetoro. But the DNC put somebody named Barack H Obama on the ballots. Legally Barack H Obama doesn’t even exist. All the people who voted for him in 2008 were SUCKERED. There is NO PUBLIC RECORD DATABASE in the US that contains any evidence of a legal name change having ever been adjucated in ANY courtroom anywhere in the US, including AK,and Hawaii. Nor is there any record in any Superior Court anywhere in the US showing that a Petition for Name change was legally filed, and was adjucated. So folks Romney has been talking to a person who ISN’T REALLY even the legally elected POTUS. The US does NOT HAVE a legally valid POTUS.

  12. ………..THAT IS ALL because a CERTIFIED copy of a legally valid BC is required to change your SURNAME. Soetoro does not HAVE a LEGALLY VALID BC,as we all now know. BYE BYE ALL!

  13. Obama did look….still….as Krauthammer characterized him….like an amateur at the point of only running for councilman with his “littleness”.

    I think Romney was still targeting women and independents, knowing the Zero campaign’s main goal tonight was to press him into looking like a warmonger. And Romney did not take the bait. I think that is why Obama looked still extremely frustrated and mean at the end. I also think Romney was conscious of how he appeared to world leaders who had to see him as not being as “flexible” as they KNOW Zero is. And he wasn’t going to advertise what his larger plans would be by arguing with Obama on rather singular and smaller positions. And, btw, Mr. O, our military DOES still use bayonets!!

  14. Donald Trump has the goods on Obama that he claims could change the election. Per Trump the information will be released on Wednesday.

  15. IS OBAMA BEGINNING TO CRACK?
    Forensic profiler Andrew Hodges: ‘I know when a guilty person starts to break’

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/is-obama-beginning-to-crack/

    This was written before this last debate, but is worth reading. It will be interesting to know what the author’s appraisal is now.

  16. “Michelle Obama planned on divorcing her husband and even prepared divorce papers while Obama was in the Illinois State Legislature according to best selling author and Investigative Journalist Dr. Jerome Corsi.

    “This has been an arranged life and marriage from almost the beginning from what I can figure for Barack Obama” Corsi stated on Ears to Hear Radio.”

    http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/2012/10/michelle-obama-planned-on-divorcing-her.html
    =====
    “Ears To Hear Radio Guest Jerome Corsi Monday Oct 15, 2012″

    http://www.blogtalkradio.com/markandlauren-/2012/10/15/ears-to-hear-radio-guest-jerome-corsi-monday-oct-15-2012

  17. Mr. Romney is getting my vote easily.

    I am tired of Obama lying through his teeth on everything. Oh, yes, Mr. (Lawyer) Obama…thanks for the hike in gas prices and lousy rising food prices while you have been in office pushing your agenda.

    King Obamamama. ..I don’t need a mama of any type any more .. I need a real President that has dignity and class. (Yes, that does matter.)

    Hello America – when will we stop electing Lawyers to political office?

  18. “IS OBAMA BEGINNING TO CRACK?”

    “FORENSIC PROFILER ANDREW HODGES:
    “‘I KNOW WHEN A GUILTY PERSON STARTS TO BREAK’”

    By Andrew G. Hodges

    “From my experience as a forensic profiler, I know when a guilty person starts to break. Law enforcement describes how guilty suspects show signs of cracking during an interrogation – and they push on those weaknesses. We can view Obama’s poor performance during the first presidential debate with Romney on Oct. 3 in a similar way. The debate – a symbolic interrogation – was the first time Obama had faced tough questions since 2008.

    And he showed signs of cracking.

    [...]

    Additionally, I showed how in recent communications Obama’s unconscious guilt is off the charts. Running for reelection has especially triggered his misdeeds in a fresh way. Again he is trying to pull the wool over America’s eyes with plans for more disguised fury directed at our nation.

    This I believe is how we can ultimately understand his poor presidential debate – deep-seated, powerful guilt. Obama was a “no show,” he kept looking down. He could not look America in the eye. Frequently he never answered Romney, allowing him to dominate.

    All in all we have a behavioral confession: “I do not belong in this office.” A non-verbal confession of his illegal presidency.

    All along Obama has told us a major key to understanding him is reading his behavior (as commentator and former psychiatrist Charles Krauthammer has also observed). Remember, Obama stressed in his 2008 Fathers’ Day speech as a candidate how absent fathers produced sons who attacked community foundations. He talked about how sons of absent fathers repeated the destructive behavior of the father. Clearly he made plain his father was absent in his scathing criticism of absent fathers.

    The day following the debate, Obama insisted in a speech that Romney “ought to tell the people the truth” and that he wasn’t during the debate. Unconsciously, Obama points to his own enormous guilt and tremendous deception of the people.

    This also harkens back to his hidden confession in his inaugural address with numerous images suggesting an ineligible president: taking shortcuts, back-room deals that violate trust, and clinging to power through corruption and deceit and the silencing of dissent. Obama repeatedly shows us how his brilliant unconscious – the honest super intelligence we all possess – eventually confesses in words that match his behavior.

    Regarding the first debate, several key commentators including WND’s Joseph Farah theorized that some powerful integrity issue among Obama donors was greatly distracting him. But Farah suggests he intuitively picked up on the deepest integrity reason as his column showed. He observed Obama falling apart beyond belief, and noted that Obama “grew increasingly uneasy, nervous … an inability to think clearly on his feet.” He underscored an extreme deficit in Obama’s “executive capabilities” (all these are signs of cracking) and raises the key question, “Why are we seeing this now?”

    Farah emphasizes that Obama was never challenged as a candidate and, most importantly, was “never screened for constitutional eligibility.” Farah recognizes that such a major offense would mean enormous guilt deep down.

    ===> See this as another sign of Obama’s guilt – to blatantly attack America’s energy policies and economy and then deny it.

    Disguised in accusations directed at Romney and the Republicans, unconsciously he presented America with several striking comments secretly describing himself.

    He accused Romney, the businessman, of shipping jobs overseas, bankrupting companies and laying off workers which would fit precisely with Obama shipping oil-drilling jobs to foreign countries, causing layoffs and heading America toward bankruptcy with his out-of-control spending.

    One shining example occurred when he belittled Romney’s economic plan.

    “Governor Romney doesn’t have a five-point plan. He has a one-point plan. And that plan is to make sure that folks at the top play by a different set of rules. That’s been his philosophy in the private sector … that’s been his philosophy as a presidential candidate.”

    Once more Obama confesses unconsciously that all along, even as a private citizen (and college student), he planned on playing by a different set of rules, which he has carried out as president.

    ===> We could have predicted that he would get in yet another striking unconscious confession that he had violated the rule of law and by extension the Constitution as an illegal foreign-born president. In both his inauguration speech and his recent U.N. speech he repeatedly insisted how we must live by the Constitution as his deeper moral compass pointed to his guilt.

    Go back to his Fathers’ Day speech as a candidate in 2008 when he warned America who he was: “When I was a young man, I thought life was all about me – how do I make my way in the world, and how do I become successful and how do I get the things that I want.” Obama was telling us then and now that he had a one-point plan.

    It was and is all about him to do whatever he wanted with the United States Constitution. But deep down [in his unconscious] he insists he must be stopped.”

    Continue Reading The Entire Article Here:

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/is-obama-beginning-to-crack/

  19. My niece posted, on Facebook, a pro Obama piece about how Obama won the debate. Out of curiosity I started reading the comments to see what was said about the debate, and Obama. Much to my pleasure I found that 75% of the comments were pro Romney, and negative for Obama.

  20. Press release-Evidence of forgery in Obama’s birth certificate was admitted into evidence at trial, decision by the court is expected shortly

    Posted on | October 22, 2012 | 16 Comments

    Press release

    Law office of Orly Taitz

    Today a trial was conducted in Indianapolis Indiana on the issue of Daclaratory relief and injunctive relief due to Obama’s use of forged Birth Certificate, Selective Service Certificate and a fraudulently obtained Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425.

    Presiding Judge is a superior court Judge Sherry K. Reid. For the Plaintiffs appeared attorneys Orly Taitz and local Indiana counsel Greg Black. For the defense appeared Deputy Attorney General Kenneth Joel and Deputy attorney general Jefferson Garn.

    Over an extremely rigorous objection by the defense, Judge Reid admitted into evidence exhibits and testimony of witnesses Paul Irey and Felicito Papa.

    Mr. Papa testified that he graduated from the Indiana Institute of Technology had some 20 years of experience with Adobe Illustrator program. He testified that Obama”s birth certificate opened in Adobe illustrator in 9 layers, which means that this is a document, which underwent computer manipulation. Mr. Papa testified that it cannot be a genuine document, as in 1961 there was no Adobe Illustrator. Birth certificates in 1961 were created not on the computer, but with a typewriter. He stated his opinion that this is a forgery. His exhibits, showing layers within the document, were admitted into evidence.

    Mr. Paul Irey testified that he has 57 years of experience working for NSA and later advertising, typesetting and computer graphics programs.

    Mr. Irey testified that Obama’s alleged birth certificate is a computer generated forgery.

    Mr. Irey had a large board with exhibits, where he showed enlargements of all the letters in Obama’s birth certificate. He vividly demonstrated that letters came from different typesetting, which in itself is a proof of forgery.

    Additionally Mr. Irey testified that when a document is printed with a typewriter, the spaces between the letters are the same, however in Obama’s birth certificate the spacing varies, which is a sign of forgery.

    Mr. Irey also testified that there is a white halo around letters in Obama’s birth certificate, which can exist oly as a result of computer manipulation. Mr. Irey testified that Obama’s birth certificate is a computer generated forgery.

    Decision by the court is expected within a week.

    More information on this and other cases will be posted on Orly TaitzESQ.com

    End of Press release

  21. Thank you for posting the information from the Indiana trial. I don’t go to Orly’s site anymore because I always seem to be the victim of a computer virus right afterward. I cannot get my hopes up though I do think it is relevant that the information was accepted as evidence. I am looking forward to Trump’s revelation but doubt that it is information we haven’t known for a long time. With so many people doing early voting every day counts and I don’t agree with the delay. If it is relevant and catastrophic than the public should be informed immediately.

  22. Dow falls 250 as earnings, Europe put Street on edge

    http://www.marketwatch.com/

  23. Seriously, how many times can he lie and get away with it????!!! All NoBumma did was attack Romney….ridiculous display of fear and immaturity! He didn’t apologize?? Really?? WTH?? I had to drink heavily last night just so I didn’t break my tv!!! America stronger?? Who does he think he’s kidding?? Doesn’t he know the burn him in ephigy all over the middle east?? I need another drink!

  24. “A SOLID ROMNEY WIN WHERE IT MATTERS”

    Carol Platt Liebau
    Blogger, Townhall.com

    Oct 22, 2012 10:59 PM EST

    “When analyzing who won a debate, you can look at a number of factors: Who achieved their overarching objective, who had the most memorable lines, who might have left behind ticking time bombs in terms of statements that will return to haunt them. Looking at any of the three, Romney was the clear winner, and Obama the loser.

    Obviously, Romney’s overarching objective wasn’t to score debate points on Benghazi or Syria. It was to prove that he is competent, calm, knowledgeable and — most emphatically — not a warmonger. It was to make sure he seemed presidential. He achieved it. By contrast, the President needed to highlight some perceived Romney mistake or lack of knowledge, or unsuitability of temperament or other disqualifying characteristic. He failed — and worse, he made himself dislikable in his efforts to goad Romney into a fight . . . especially when Romney serenely declined to take the bait.

    On memorable lines that provide the moments viewers remember, Romney obviously had it all over the President. From “attacking me is not an agenda” to “Mr. [pR]esident, America Has Not Dictated to Other Nations; We Have Freed Other Nations From Dictators” to “Nowhere in the world is America’s influence stronger than it was 4 years ago” (an echo of “are you better off than you were four years ago?”) he had the memorable take-away phrases.

    [...]

    [...] At the same time, [the urgent and highest level national security crisis disaster, foreign-born domestic terrorist Communist Muslim totalitarian dictator, madman serial criminal domestic terrorist war criminal, Soebarkah-Barry Soetoro aka "Obama," who is waging a foreign financed, foreign and domestic terrorist globalist Communist Muslim Brotherhood civilization-jihad coup d'etat war on the USA - from inside of the USA - against the USA, as the constantly daily law-breaking, out-of-control completely lawless, delusional, power-mad megalomaniac, narcissist, foreign serial criminal usurper madman, and the foreign imposter "Obama"] seemed nervous, on the attack, again condescending and did nothing to raise his flagging likability numbers (he even seemed to me to be lecturing voters in his closing statement!).

    What struck me the most was that for Romney, it is clear about America and its future. For Obama, it is all about him — whether he was right, what he has done — and not about a policy or a vision for this country . . . yet again, he failed to lay one out. And that, in the end, reveals how apt Governor Romney’s invocation was when, in his closing statement, he highlighted the two very different paths for this country that each man represents.”

    Read The Entire Article Here:

    http://townhall.com/tipsheet/carolplattliebau/2012/10/22/a_solid_romney_win

  25. GLOBAL JIHAD

    “THE CONSEQUENCES OF OBAMA’S LOVE OF ISLAM”

    “EXCLUSIVE: NONIE DARWISH ON WHY BHO DIDN’T PROVIDE SECURITY NEEDED IN BENGHAZI”

    By Nonie Darwish

    “I have never entertained the idea that Obama was a Muslim and always believed he was a socialist. But Obama’s behavior over the last four years regarding Islam have convinced me that Obama has a Socialist/Islamic-centered worldview – a combination that is not uncommon in many parts of the Muslim world.

    Having been a journalist in Egypt for six years in the ’70s, I have witnessed socialism with an Islamic twist to be a popular political ideology, especially amongst Arab journalists and intellectuals. Socialism and even communism have managed to survive in the ruthless Islamic political system as an alternative to full-fledged Shariah. The two ideologies blended together in the Baath Party in Syria, Iraq and socialist regimes in Egypt and Yemen. One major difference between the two ideologies is that Islam uses Allah, while socialism uses atheism, to fight the God of Christianity. Free democracies such as the United States are alien to Islam and socialists because they regard government as a servant to the people and believe that human rights are from God and not from government or Shariah.

    Having said that, both Shariah and socialism united in their envy of Western society and needed to change it. That is when Obama became the savior of both Islam and socialism. He embodied both ideologies, socialism and Islam, and was groomed for years to help the socialist and Islamic causes inside America. The claim that Obama is a Christian was a silly joke, but a necessary lie for the greater cause of changing America to fit the goals of socialists and Islamists.

    Obama became the one, the savior of both Islam and socialists. [...].”

    The only explanation for Obama’s little exciting ring secret is that he is a closet Muslim and feels that he can serve Islam best if he denies his being a Muslim for the purpose of a higher aspiration: to serve the Muslim world from the White House, in Islamic terms the higher jihad. Obama has no problem whatsoever in lying for the sake of “hope and change” since lying about being a Muslim in a majority non-Muslim country is allowed under Islam. Lying for the purpose of jihad in Islam is not only allowed, but an obligation to be proud of and a means to blame the enemies of Islam for one’s lies. Shariah law states: “Lying is obligatory if the purpose is obligatory.” Muslim clerics have no problem lying not just to the non-Muslim world but even to the Muslim masses, since Islam also allows Muslims to lie in order to bring Muslims together in harmony and friendship.

    [...] Nothing in Obama’s world is the fault of Islam, and that is why he ordered the Fort Hood massacre to be classified as workplace violence and not Islamic terrorism.

    Obama believes that he uniquely understands the Muslim world and will bring a new era of peace with Islam, at least during his administration. There are also strong rumors in Egypt that when Obama met with the Egyptian foreign minister, he confided in him that he was a Muslim and that he would help the Islamic cause in America after he passed his health-care bill.

    But as [a foreign and domestic Communist Muslim serial criminal terrorist madman usurper in] the United States, Obama was in a quagmire between protecting American lives and being loyal to Islam and appeasing his Islamic friends. [...] Also, if Obama were to confront militarily Muslim jihadists in Islamic countries, his whole theory that he has brought a new page in American/Islamic relations would fall apart and he would be no different from his predecessors, Bush or Reagan.

    [...] Obama did not want to deal with the possibility that American Marines would shoot at Muslim attackers to save American lives.

    [...] Obama gambled with the lives of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others and left them as sacrificial lambs rather than violate Muslim attackers.

    [...]

    With the terrorist attack in Benghazi, Islamists and jihadists made it clear to us that they couldn’t care less about Obama, his appeasement, his apology and even his Islam. They could not put on hold their jihad or restrain themselves for an American president who wanted to help build a better image of Islam to the world.

    They could not play the game with Obama and refrain from jihad even during the Obama presidency. Jihadists declared that Obama, Muslim or not, is just another American president who should not be trusted. No leader, Muslim or not, can get away from the wrath of Islamic jihad, and that is why an Islamic angry mob was recently torching Obama’s effigy in anger.

    It is unfortunate that it took a tragedy in Libya and the lives of decent Americans to prove that Obama is unfit to be president. Obama has fooled many Americans for four years, and that is why when he sees the face of Romney he is reminded of a reality he could not fully eliminate. Obama knows the game is over and his presidency is over.”

    Read The Entire Article Here:
    http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/the-consequences-of-obamas-love-of-islam/

  26. “Did Obama have a Nose Job to Hide Davis Resemblance ?”

    “It appears Obama had some aesthetic refinement. The upper and middle nasal vault are both narrowed. The tip and infra-tip are softer and the tip has been rotated up. Alar height appears to have been reduced so the lower part of the nose that makes up the nostrils appears softer. These changes are not characteristic of the natural aging process, where the tip tends to settle and rotate downward causing the appearance of a longer nose and where the tip also often widens noticeably.”

    J David Holcomb, MD
    Holcomb Facial Plastic Surgery, PLLC
    Sarasota FL”

    “In the 3 younger photographs, Obama appears to have a bulbous nasal tip with wide alar bases, not uncommon with males and with skin of color. The more current photos show a thinner nasal tip which suggests some finessing of his nose over the years, but it is a very natural-looking effect.”

    Wendy Lewis, The Knife Coach

    Wendy Lewis is a cosmetic surgery consultant and author of 11 consumer health and beauty books, including America’s Cosmetic Doctors & Dentists and Plastic Makes Perfect. Wendy has appeared on CNN, Good Morning America, and MSNBC.”

    http://www.obamasrealfather.com/breaking_news007/

  27. Gordon’ it is so funny you posted this, I was looking at old photos of Obama not too long ago and was thinking the same thing….and our noses don’t shrink with age….our noses and ears keep growing even after everything else stops.

  28. “BOMBSHELL: OBAMA’S HOMOSEXUAL AFFAIRS ARE MENTIONED IN MICHELLE OBAMA’S DIVORCE PAPERS”

    “CORSI: OBAMA’S SEXUALITY PLAYED ROLE IN MICHELLE PREPARED DIVORCE PAPERS”

    Thursday, October 18, 2012

    “Michelle Obama planned on divorcing her husband and even prepared divorce papers while Obama was in the Illinois State Legislature according to best selling author and Investigative Journalist Dr. Jerome Corsi.

    Saying, “Obama has also a homosexual history”, Corsi spoke of this and much more on a live internet radio program that was broadcast earlier this week.

    “I have another article prepared that we ought to publish pretty soon” Corsi said Monday. “People don’t realize it but Michelle was preparing, and I actually found divorce papers, to divorce Obama at one point in their marriage”. he said.

    He goes on to say, “When he was in the State Legislature before he became a U.S. Senator, Obama was smoking all the time, gone, having homosexual relationships, no money…Michelle was tired of it.”

    Here is the entire radio interview:

    During the radio interview with the Senior Staff Writer at World Net Daily, Corsi discusses Obama’s Senior White House adviser and Assistant to the President for Intergovernmental Relations and Public Liaison, Valerie Jarrett, and ties together Jesse Jackson, and Reverend Wright as three people that would help groom Obama for the Presidency and say that the eventual marriage between Barack Obama and Michelle Robinson was not a happenstance romance.

    “This has been an arranged life and marriage from almost the beginning from what I can figure for Barack Obama” Corsi stated on Ears to Hear Radio.

    Also noted in the interview that Valerie Jarrett’s Father-In-Law, Tom Jarrett was a Communist that worked with Obama’s “mentor” Frank Marshall Davis.

    Corsi has found collaboration with members at the Trinity United church Obama attended for some twenty years. According to an article Dr. Corsi published at WND on Oct. 2nd:

    “That’s the terminology. At Trinity, you’re urged to ‘get with the program,’” explained a male beneficiary of the Down Low Club. “What that means is it’s OK to go ahead and have sex with men, just as long as you ‘get with the program’ and marry a woman, somebody no straight guy would want to marry.”

    The wife, the Down Low Club member explained, is “your ‘beard,’ your cover – so you can look like you’re living a straight life, even though you’re not.”

    See The Entire Article Here:

    http://www.infiltratednation.com/2012/10/corsi-obamas-sexuality-play-role-in.html

  29. observer | October 23, 2012 at 1:09 pm |

    Man Claims That Obama Sold Cocaine In College

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    Here is a comment under the article you cited:

    teacake • an hour ago

    THIS is old news really. There’s a fellow who wrote a book about it, he was one of the guys who hung out with Barry… not just a coke dealer but a gay hustler too.

  30. “MILITARY FORCES CHAPLAINS TO PERFORM ‘GAY’ MARRIAGE”

    “LAWMAKER: RELIGIOUS OBJECTION MEANS END OF THEIR CAREERS”

    “Despite the fact that homosexual “marriage” is not recognized by the federal government, America’s military chaplains are being forced to put aside their religious beliefs and perform same-sex ceremonies on U.S. bases.

    Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., is demanding an end to such coercion and blames President Obama for the attack on chaplains’ religious beliefs.

    Inhofe is the second highest ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee. He admits that some chaplains have opted out, but only with the understanding that their refusal to follow orders will mean the end of their careers. The senator considers the Navy the most hostile to the religious freedom of chaplains.

    Inhofe told WND’s Greg Corombos further frustration flows from the inability of active duty military to publicly disagree with their orders.

    “You won’t find many active chaplains who will tell you the truth about this because you know what will happen to them if we do,” Inhofe said. “But you get the retired chaplains, I don’t know of one exception that isn’t outraged by this and saying that government can’t come along and dictate the moral principles that they have always had – both before their current career and up to the present time.”

    So who is demanding that chaplains check their scriptural bearings at the chapel door? Inhofe said top military brass and civilian leaders at the Pentagon may be enforcing these policies, but he said responsibility lies in just one place.

    ===> “It’s the president,” said Inhofe. “I keep hearing Democrats say, ‘Well, this isn’t what the Pentagon wants.’ The Pentagon answers to the commander in chief. The commander in chief if the president of the United States. So he’s the one responsible.”

    In response to this pressure on the chaplains, Inhofe and Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., are introducing the Military Religious Freedom Protection Act.

    “It stipulates and states specifically that chaplains shall not be ordered or required to perform any ceremony that is contrary to the moral principles or religious beliefs of the chaplain’s faith group,” Inhofe explained. “It further says that property under the jurisdiction of (the Defense Department) shall not be used to perform a marriage or involving anything other than the union of one man and one woman.”

    Inhofe said he knows for a fact that military brass don’t like the way the military culture is trending, but they don’t speak out publicly because of the chain of command. Inhofe concedes that following orders is a vital part of what makes our armed forces work effectively, but he also advocates protection of their speech rights.

    “What I’d prefer is for these generals and high ranking officials to say publicly what they really feel and have the courage to do that,” Inhofe said. “Then go ahead and do what they’re commanded to do.”

    Inhofe said the best way to change the orders from the top is to change the commanders in chief.

    Article & Radio Interview Here: http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/military-forces-chaplains-to-perform-gay-marriage/

  31. Tuesday Humor: Two Coffees Please:

    Having arrived at the Gates of Heaven, Barrack Obama meets a man with a beard.
    ‘Are you Mohamed?’ he asks.
    ‘No my son, I am St. Peter; Mohamed is higher up.
    Peter then points to a ladder that rises into the clouds.
    Delighted that Mohamed should be higher than St. Peter, Obama climbs
    the ladder in great strides,
    Climbs up through the clouds and comes into a room Where he meets another
    bearded man. He asks again, ‘Are you Mohamed?
    ‘Why no,’ he answers, ‘I am Moses;
    Mohamed is higher still.
    Exhausted, but with a heart full of joy
    He climbs the ladder yet again.
    He discovers a larger room where he meets an Angelic looking man with a
    beard. Full of hope, he asks again, Are you Mohamed?
    No, I am Jesus, the Christ;
    You will find Mohamed higher up.
    Mohamed higher than Jesus!
    Man, oh man! Obama can hardly contain his Delight and climbs and climbs
    ever higher. Once again, he reaches an even larger room Where he meets this truly
    magnificent looking man With a silver white beard and once again repeats
    his question: ‘Are you Mohamed?’ he gasps as he is by now, Totally out of breath from all
    his climbing. ‘No, my son, I am Almighty God, the Alpha and the Omega, But you look
    exhausted. Would you like a cup of coffee?
    Obama says, ‘Yes please!
    As God looks behind him, he claps his hands And yells out: “Yo, Mohamed,
    two coffees!
    Keep your trust in God; Your president is an idiot
    M-P

  32. PRESIDENT SLAMMED FOR VICIOUS ‘OBAMASTARE’
    ‘The media can’t sell the Obama they saw last night’

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obama-slammed-for-vicious-stare-in-debate/

  33. Alex Pappas:

    “Trump adviser knocks down speculation that Obama revelation is about cocaine”

    “An adviser to Donald Trump told The Daily Caller on Tuesday that speculation that the real estate mogul’s “very big” revelation about President Barack Obama expected this week has to do with college-era allegations involving cocaine is not true.

    “Mr. Trump’s announcement is substantially more important to the American people than these allegations made against the president,” Michael Cohen, special counsel to Trump, told TheDC by phone on Tuesday.”

    http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/23/trump-adviser-knocks-down-speculation-that-obama-revelation-is-about-cocaine

  34. DURING THE CONFERENCE IN JUDGE’S CHAMBERS DEFENSE STATED TO JUDGE REID THAT THEY DO NOT HAVE ANY WITNESSES. THEY DID NOT BRING ONE SINGLE WITNESS TO COUNTER PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE BY PAUL IREY AND FELICITO PAPA THAT OBAMA’S BC IS A FORGERY. THAT IS THE REASON WHY NO WITNESSES FOR DEFENSE WERE CALLED. I WOULD BE ABSOLUTELY SHOCKED IF AFTER THIS JUDGE REID WOULD RULE OBAMA TO BE LEGITIMATE

    http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/

  35. Bain Capital Owns Clear Channel (Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, Michael Savage, Etc.)
    By Michael, on January 12th, 2012

    Wouldn’t it be great if a Republican presidential candidate could just buy the support of just about every major conservative talk show host in America? Well, it may not be as far-fetched as you may think.

    http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/bain-capital-owns-clear-channel-rush-limbaugh-sean-hannity-glenn-beck-michael-savage-etc
    .

  36. Where is Miitt the twit on Carnival Barker O Barky. Why doesn’t he just call him a usurper on Clear Channel and be done with it..

  37. DANIEL BATES:

    “Donald Trump to reveal ‘divorce papers of Michelle and Barack Obama’, claims respected financial pundit”

    “Donald Trump is to claim that he has unearthed divorce papers of Michelle Obama and the President, according to a respected financial pundit with links to the tycoon.

    It is alleged that the eccentric real estate mogul will claim that the documents show the First Lady and the President were at one point in their two decades of marriage seriously considering splitting up.

    The claims about divorce papers have previously been made in a book released earlier this year by author Ed Klein. The White House rubbished the allegations then and claimed Klein had a history of making things up.”

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2222070/Donald-Trump-reveal-divorce-papers-Michelle-Barack-Obama–claims-respected-financial-pundit.html

  38. Grand Illusion: The Myth of Voter Choice in a Two-Party Tyranny

    Debate Live Stream Tonight – 9pm C-span

  39. C-SPAN to Cover Free & Equal Third Party Debate

    Election 2012

    C-SPAN just announced that they will cover the third party presidential debate, hosted by Larry King. 9 pm Eastern, Tuesday October 23rd. Link to schedule:

    http://www.c-spanvideo.org/videoLibrary/gridSchedule.php?zoo

  40. GORDO | October 23, 2012 at 5:51 pm —

    “Donald Trump to reveal ‘divorce papers of Michelle and Barack Obama’, claims respected financial pundit”
    ==========
    Ann Coulter:

    “Obama’s Signature Move: Unsealing Private Records”

    “Let’s take a romp down memory lane and review the typical Obama campaign strategy. Obama became a U.S. senator only by virtue of David Axelrod’s former employer, the Chicago Tribune, ripping open the sealed divorce records of Obama’s two principal opponents.”

    http://townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/2012/08/01/obamas_signature_move_unsealing_private_records/page/full/

  41. Since when is a divorce PRIVILEGED information? Divorce like NAME CHANGE becomes PUBLIC INFORMATION after ADJUDICATION. So for somebody to seal divorce documents is tatamount to SHOVELING MANURE AGAINST THE TIDE. But then what do you expect from HORSES’ A$$ES.

  42. Anybody wanting divorce records need only visit one of the MANY public records databases. There are a number of them. Most, you must pay a fee to get what you are looking for, but to people in certain law enforcement positions,and/or members of a Superior Court clerk’s office,etc the information is FREE. These databases are scattered across the US, and are present in nearly EVERY STATE. Public Libraries are also public records archives. To mention one the Church of the LDS comes to mind. They have one of, if not the largest database in the US. That is why I was pursuing certain Soetoro records which I believe are being held by our PUBLIC LIBRARY, in the Genealogical Records section of our Public Library. Our records depository is second only to that of the LDS archives. I still believe that microfilm records of the Soetoro BS is on file here. I was stopped cold in my search by a severe case of shingles. My health has not returned to what it was before the shingles struck. But any diligent researcher could easily determine the presence of the microfilms by simply looking through the cardex files. Much of the information is now ONLINE. Our public records are also now accessible via the Allen County website. They also publish a list of tax distressed properties,which can be purchased from the county for the taxes due. It is ALL PUBLIC INFORMATION.

  43. BYE BYE ALL ….Time to shut down, and get out of here! Godbless

  44. God bless oldsailor.

  45. cabbyaz | October 23, 2012 at 3:47 pm |

    PRESIDENT SLAMMED FOR VICIOUS ‘OBAMASTARE’
    ‘The media can’t sell the Obama they saw last night’

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obama-slammed-for-vicious-stare-in-debate/
    ____________________________________

    “VICIOUS OBAMSTARE” describes it exactly Cabby! I watched that look on his face for a good part of the debate, and it was SO STRANGE… SURREAL! More than anything that was SAID by either candidate was the look on Obama’s face that sticks out in my mind… it lasts in my memory unfortunately. It was pure evil. I had to turn it off about 3/4 of the way through.

    One good thing… he CAN’T be the antichrist. He’s too obviously evil. The REAL one will fool even the elect (if possible).

  46. I think Corsi stole some of Trump’s thunder….wonder if Trump will refer people to Corsi’s interview which also brings in Obama’s gay life style as being part of the reason for Mooch’s filing for divorce:

    CORSI: OBAMA’S SEXUALITY PLAYED ROLE IN MICHELLE PREPARED DIVORCE PAPERS

    “I have another article prepared that we ought to publish pretty soon” Corsi said Monday. “People don’t realize it but Michelle was preparing, and I actually found divorce papers, to divorce Obama at one point in their marriage”. he said.
    He goes on to say, “When he was in the State Legislature before he became a U.S. Senator, Obama was smoking all the time, gone, having homosexual relationships, no money…Michelle was tired of it.”

    http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/2012/10/michelle-obama-planned-on-divorcing-her.html

  47. I think when Gov. Romney said in the debate that Barry told the Russin guy that after his reelection he could be “more flexible” to the desires of Putin that Gov. Romney was letting Barry the kenyan fraud know that he was going to start running that video! I sure hope so because I have been begging them to start running that and the one about the “shovel” ready jobs that Barry and his GE buddy thought was so funny.

  48. btw……. has anyone noticed that the Obamas daughters are never at the debates and in plubic any more? I love seeing Gov. Romneys grand children with him at the debates.

  49. 0:24
    Barack Obama in open microphone gaffe with Dmitry Medvedev

  50. The usurper has been on the campaign trail for four years, it will be a relief, to many, to not have to look at the bastard lying every day.

  51. I’m enjoying telling people that I was right all along, that Larry Sinclair was telling the truth. HA ha! This is great! Michelle Obama files divorce papers in 2000, and part of the explanation for the divorce filing was Barack’s down low activities. Yep, Sinclair was telling the truth. His encounter with Barack Obama back in Chicago in 1999 actually happened. Deal with it. But I am gloating a little.

  52. donald young larry bland need their dead voices heard in court soon they died in vain for the one

  53. ““VICIOUS OBAMSTARE” describes it exactly Cabby! I watched that look on his face for a good part of the debate, and it was SO STRANGE… SURREAL! More than anything that was SAID by either candidate was the look on Obama’s face that sticks out in my mind… it lasts in my memory unfortunately. It was pure evil. I had to turn it off about 3/4 of the way through.

    One good thing… he CAN’T be the antichrist. He’s too obviously evil. The REAL one will fool even the elect (if possible).”

    Sue Q: could it be that he has fooled even you? I still stand on my assertion that he is just that. Time will tell…………….

  54. Mitt Romney Style

  55. protectourcivilrightsfreedoms

    “THE TRUTH ABOUT LIBYA COMES OUT . . .”

    Carol Platt Liebau
    Blogger, Townhall.com
    October 23, 2012

    “New information from Reuters makes it absolutely clear how much deliberate prevarication and dishonesty there was emanating from The White House and the State Department in the wake of the Benghazi attacks.

    The whole story is here.*

    Granted, as the story is careful to note, not all intelligence accounts can be immediately credited as automatically accurate in these situations.

    But what is so shocking about the email Reuters has obtained is that it means that the administration’s repeated characterizations of the attack as “spontaneous”demonstrations in response to a YouTube video — for two full weeks thereafter — were knowingly, hideously false, misleading and incomplete.

    What a scandal.”

    http://townhall.com/tipsheet/carolplattliebau/2012/10/23/the_truth_about_libya_comes_out

    =======================

    * “WHITE HOUSE TOLD OF MILITANT CLAIM TWO HOURS AFTER LIBYA ATTACK: EMAILS”

    “U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were killed in the Benghazi assault, which President Barack Obama and other U.S. officials ultimately acknowledged was a “terrorist” attack carried out by militants with suspected links to al Qaeda affiliates or sympathizers.

    Administration spokesmen, including White House spokesman Jay Carney, citing an unclassified assessment prepared by the CIA, maintained for days that the attacks likely were a spontaneous protest against an anti-Muslim film.

    While officials did mention the possible involvement of “extremists,” they did not lay blame on any specific militant groups or possible links to al Qaeda or its affiliates until intelligence officials publicly alleged that on September 28.”

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/24/us-usa-benghazi-emails-idUSBRE89N02C20121024

  56. Call congress with info on divorce papers and article Oct 20th on Bengazi,,
    morrsi was involved to release blind sheet http://www.commieblaster.com
    f
    FOX news needs this report. This is the real truth

  57. Planned Bengezi attack set up Morrsi involved to get blind sleek released
    http://Www.commieblaster.com Oct ,20th article Pass on

  58. seaque,

    Calling Mr. Romney ‘Mitt the twit’ and posting a parody video of him that throws the F Bomb just shows how little respect you have for the posters here and particularly, yourself.

    If you don’t like Mitt Romney (and it’s obvious that you don’t) why don’t you just sit in your mom’s basement and watch Kiss videos on election night and skip the whole thing or, you could go and write in your lord and master, Ron Paul.

    People like you are one of the reasons America is in the mess she’s in.

    What are you trying to prove here with your vitriol? You’re not amusing; not amusing at all.

  59. CA Warrior | October 23, 2012 at 10:56 pm |

    You could be right that Obama is the antichrist. He certianly is evil, but not very clever. I believe he is playing a large part in moving this world towards the final chapter, but (just my feeling) the antichrist will be far more inteligent as his knowledge will be super natural. This guy is an idiot.

  60. Seaque,
    Regardless of what your opinion is of Romney, that video you posted is vulgar and disrespectful to the hilt. To say it is offensive would be putting it mildly. I don’t care if it is a parody, posting it here says something about your character and discernment. You don’t commend yourself at all, and, frankly, you should be ashamed.

  61. Well, Obama’s inept handling of these backdoor meetings with Iran is going to backfire big time and could put us all in increasingly more peril. This is very serious business.

    IRAN SECRET-DEAL REPORT UPSETS AYATOLLAH, OBAMA
    Khamenei ‘incensed’ meeting was revealed

    The revelation on WND of the secret meetings between the Obama administration and Iran has caused confusion and anger for those who were taking part – and has derailed the previously agreed-to plans of an announcement for a breakthrough on the nuclear-weapons crisis prior to the U.S. elections.
    In Monday night’s presidential debate, President Obama again denied reports in “newspapers” but later contradicted himself and admitted to the possibility of bilateral meetings with Iran.
    Read more:
    http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/iran-secret-deal-report-upsets-ayatollah-obama/

  62. Philo-Publius

    Good morning CW and all

    Just found this on Drudge.

    NC voters say ballot cast for Romney came up Obama on machine…

    On Monday, several voters complained that their electronic ballot machine cast the wrong vote. All the complaints were made by people who voted at the Bur-Mil Park polling location.

    One of the voters, Sher Coromalis, says she cast her ballot for Governor Mitt Romney, but every time she entered her vote it defaulted to President Obama.
    http://myfox8.com/2012/10/23/guilford-county-voters-say-they-voted-for-the-wrong-candidate/

  63. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    This story has disturbed me this whole weekend.Where are we heading?

    “Autumn Pasquale”

    https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&q=%22Autumn+Pasquale%22&oq=%22Autumn+Pasquale%22&gs_l=news-cc.12..43j43i400.5540.13900.0.16871.2.2.0.0.0.0.163.229.1j1.2.0…0.0…1ac.1.lq1drCtu9kQ#q=%22Autumn+Pasquale%22&hl=en&gl=us&prmd=imvnsuo&ei=pdaHUMSCPajW2QXeoIBI&start=10&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.&fp=bb2e79c6c9080287&bpcl=35466521&biw=1120&bih=616

  64. Good morning Philo, et al.
    Thanks

  65. Good Morning. If Donald Trumps big secret is divorce papers, I hope the allegations include support for Larry Sinclair’s allegations about himself and Donald Young.

  66. Philo-Publius

    From HotAir:

    Emily Smith Page Six @GossipAssassin
    Much speculation in the @PageSix office about
    @realDonaldTrump’s big Obama announcement.
    We’re hearing its not about divorce…
    http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/23/whos-up-from-some-wednesday-october-surprises-from-trump-and-gloria-allred/

  67. “OBAMA’S SECRET KILL LIST”

    By Judge Andrew P. Napolitano
    Published May 31, 2012

    “We have known for some time that President Obama is waging a private war. By that I mean he is using the CIA on his own — and not the military after congressional authorization — to fire drones at thousands of persons in foreign lands, usually while they are riding in a car or a truck.

    He has done this both with the consent and over the objection of the governments of the countries in which he has killed. He doesn’t want to talk about this, but he doesn’t deny it. How chilling is it that David Axelrod — the president’s campaign manager — has periodically seen the secret kill list? Might this be to keep the killings politically correct?

    Can the president legally do this? In a word: No.”

    Continue Reading:

    http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/05/31/president-obama-secret-kill-list/#ixzz2AEEAHLbi

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    Obama Rally Turns Ugly in Delray Beach, FL 10/23/12

  68. The Foreign Serial Criminal Madman Usurper Soebarkah’s Rally Turns Ugly in Delray Beach, FL 10/23/12

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s