Category Archives: Bill O'Reilly

Jana Winter and Fox intentionally misleading Americans?, Obama birth certificate analysis, OCR software, Data integrity vs character translation

Jana Winter and Fox intentionally misleading Americans?, Obama birth certificate analysis, OCR software, Data integrity vs character translation

“Why has Obama, after using private and taxpayer funded attorneys for years to keep his birth certificate and college records hidden, placed a computer generated birth certificate and not a certified original copy on WhiteHouse.gov?”…Citizen Wells

“And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed
–if all records told the same tale–then the lie passed into
history and became truth. “Who controls the past,” ran the
Party slogan, “controls the future: who controls the present
controls the past.”…George Orwell, “1984″

“Garbage in, Garbage out.”…Computer Science Axiom

I am a computer and business systems expert. Of the many aspects of computer systems and data I was involved in, I worked for a software company in the early 1980’s that dealt with OCR software and readers. I provided my analysis of the document placed on WhiteHouse.gov yesterday.

“When you view the document placed on WhiteHouse.gov remember it was computer generated. It is not an image file of a complete original birth certificate. It is a composite of data entered into a database(s) in the Hawaii computer systems. The data is as good as the source and the procedures and personnel who controlled the entry and maintained the integrity. From a legal standpoint it proves, if authenticated as having come from the state of Hawaii, that Obama is a US Citizen. It does not prove that he is a natural born citizen.”

Read more:

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/obama-birth-certificate-update-liar-scoreboard-jana-winter-fox-alvin-onaka-story-who-is-lying/

Jana Winter of Fox news presented this article on April 29, 2011.

“Expert: No Doubt Obama’s Birth Certificate Is Legit”

“The White House has released President Obama’s long-form birth certificate, saying the document is “proof positive” the president was born in Hawaii.

It didn’t take long for some of President Obama’s doubters to claim the long-awaited birth certificate posted online by the White House on Wednesday had been altered or might be a fake.

But a leading software expert says there’s no doubt about its authenticity, and he dismisses claims of fraud as flat-out wrong.

The doubters have latched onto the idea that Adobe Illustrator — the premier program for computer graphic artists — “reveals” evidence of document manipulation in the Obama birth certificate. They note Illustrator reveals nine separate layers of the document, and claim it’s “proof” the file has been altered.

But that’s not so, says Jean-Claude Tremblay, a leading software trainer and Adobe-certified expert, who has years of experience working with and teaching Adobe Illustrator.”

Read more:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/04/29/expert-says-obamas-birth-certificate-legit/

First of all, I have not questioned whether or not this document actually came from the State of Hawaii or not or whether or not the the document was “photoshopped.” It was not the core issue for me.

The article heading is at least misleading or an outright lie.

“Expert: No Doubt Obama’s Birth Certificate Is Legit”

  • Jean-Claude Tremblay ia a Adobe-certified expert. He only addressed the issue of document manipulation.
  • No mention was made of whether or not Tremblay was a birth certificate expert.
  • Tremblay has not been given access to an original birth certificate.
  • Tremblay did not say that the document was an authenticate presentation of Obama’s original birth certificate.

Why does the article contain these statements?

“Expert: No Doubt Obama’s Birth Certificate Is Legit”

“But a leading software expert says there’s no doubt about its authenticity, and he dismisses claims of fraud as flat-out wrong.”

A disturbing trend has developed at Fox. Bill O’Reilly misled the American people for several years by stating that he had done research and that Obama was born in Hawaii. We recently got confirmation that he relied on the birth announcements. Now Jana Winter misrepresents what the Adobe software expert has said.

Did Fox make a deal with the devil?

Jana Winter or Fox, contact me. I am not just a Adobe or OCR expert, I have expertise over a broad area in IT for over 30 years. I also am an expert on the Obama birth certificate and eligibility controversies as well as the Rezko and Chicago corruption ties.

Fox, can you handle the truth?

Bill O’Reilly lies and misinformation, Snopes lies and misinformation, Carol Bengle Gilbert Obama supporter or paid Orwellian editor

Bill O’Reilly lies and misinformation, Snopes lies and misinformation, Carol Bengle Gilbert Obama supporter or paid Orwellian editor

“And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed
–if all records told the same tale–then the lie passed into
history and became truth. “Who controls the past,” ran the
Party slogan, “controls the future: who controls the present
controls the past.”…George Orwell, “1984″

“The past, he reflected, had not merely been altered, it had
actually been destroyed. For how could you establish, even
the most obvious fact when there existed no record outside
your own memory?”…George Orwell, “1984″

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it“…Joseph Goebbels

Why did Snopes.com state that Barack Obama, Sr. lived in Connecticut when there is no evidence to support his living there and no other source, including Wikipedia, corroborates it.

“As noted above, Barack Obama’s parents divorced when he was only two years old, and his father then moved thousands of miles away, from Hawaii to Connecticut”

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/muslim.asp

Why did Carol Bengle Gilbert write the following and use Snopes.com as a source?

“A private investigator named Susan Daniels unleashed a firestorm when she and another unrelated private investigator made public allegations that President Obama appears to be using a fraudulent Social Security number.

 Daniels told World News Daily she’s “staking [her] reputation on a conclusion that Obama’s use of this Social Security number is fraudulent.” The Social Security number is question has an 042 prefix indicating issuance in Connecticut.”

“But the telling evidence that this latest Birther claim is unreliable is the scant research about any connection between Obama and the state of Connecticut underlying it. To obtain a Social Security card with a Connecticut prefix, Obama would have used a Connecticut mailing address on his application. Daniels uncovered no connection between Obama and the state of Connecticut, telling World News Daily, “There is no family connection that would appear to explain the anomaly.”

What about Obama’s father, also named Barack Hussain Obama, who lived in Connecticut after divorcing Obama’s mother? That doesn’t count as a family connection?”

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2999618/obama_social_security_number_fraud.html?cat=9

Is Carol Bengle Gilbert a rabid Obama supporter or one of the paid Orwellian Obama camp misinformation specialists?

From Oct 23, 2008 by Carol Bengle Gilbert.

“Kofi Annan’s philosophy seems to resonate with children who admire Barack Obama. My children, ages 9, 10 and 14, have always accompanied me to the polls as do the children of many other parents in my community. My 14-year-old, Andy, found out about the Leesburg rally and asked me to take him and a friend. This is the last presidential election before the boys will be old enough to vote, so it seemed especially fitting to make the trip. My daughters Cindy and Amy both admire Obama and wanted to come along.”

“I explained that I wasn’t sure how close we would get to Barack Obama because we would be in a huge crowd. In case we did get to talk to Obama, Jacob asked me to deliver a message:

“If you see Obama,” he said, “tell him two little boys really look up to him.”

Those two little boys are not alone. My daughters reported that several children at school were jealous that they were getting to go see Obama. On the way into the rally, a little girl no more than 3 smiled at me and
 
 waved her American flag, shouting, “Obama, Obama.” She was one of many children attending the rally. What amazed me most was that even when the children couldn’t see Obama from their distant perches atop parental shoulders or their positions peering between adult bodies, they retained their interest in getting a glimpse of him.”

“On seeing the McCain signs outside mansions, Cindy observed, “These are all the rich people who support McCain. Most people are poor.””

” In Northern Virginia, it seems like there is little doubt Obama can — and will — win. As someone who once lived in Northern Virginia and felt disconnected from the conservative state politics playing out in Richmond, I suspect that a rally elsewhere in Virginia would have drawn a very different crowd with a less decisive pro-Obama feel. “

http://aclnk.com/article/1137242/obama_advocates_change_at_leesburg.html?cat=7

It is clear what Carol Bengle Gilbert’s agenda is.

So, what is Bill O’Reilly’s motivation for lying to and misleading the American public?

The Citizen Wells blog has some astute and well informed commenters. From commenter  Pat 1789, 2011/04/13 at 9:33 pm.

“ok they caught it at hannity’s forum. It was BS
Dear Bill Oreally when you went to Harvard how many Foreign students commuted to class from North East Conn. LMAO
from bluecat
—————————————————
Bill O’Reilly lied in spades tonight. He lied and he mislead with an answer to a write at the end of the show.
Paraphrasing:
Email: ‘What about the Connecticut Social Security number?’
BOR response: Obama’s father lived and Connecticut and that explains it.
No, Mr. O’Reilly – now you are just making it up as you go along. You are as bad as CNN and NYT.
There is NO RECORD of Obama Senior EVER living in Connecticut. Except at – (cough, cough) Snopes – where the intellectuals on The View get their info….
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/muslim.asp
‘…his father moving to Connecticut to continue his education….’
Really Snopes? Where did you get that? It is a lie!
http://truebluenz.wordpress.com/2011…debate-110211/ http://truebluenz.wordpress.com/2011…debate-110211/
“Barack Obama Sr. lived in Hawaii from 1959 until June 1962, when he moved to Massachusetts to attend Harvard University; nothing can be found in the public record that indicates Barack Obama Sr. ever had a Connecticut address.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama,_Sr.
Obama Sr. traveled to Cambridge, Massachusetts where he began a graduate fellowship in economics at Harvard University and rented an apartment in a rooming house near Central Square in Cambridge.
Bill O’Reilly – just another talking another liar.”

From World Net Daily April 14, 2011.

“In an attempt to explain why Barack Obama, who lived in Hawaii as a teen, has a Social Security number that indicates he had a Connecticut address, Fox News host Bill O’Reilly asserted the president’s father lived in the state.

But there is no evidence that Barack Obama Sr., who left Hawaii in 1962 to study at Harvard in Massachusetts and then returned to his home country of Kenya, ever lived in Connecticut.

The controversy over Obama’s Social Security number traces back to a WND story May 11, 2010, reporting that two private investigators working independently were asking why Obama was using a number set aside for applicants in Connecticut while there is no record he ever had a mailing address in the state.”
“O’Reilly responded: “Obama’s father lived in Connecticut for several years, and sometimes the child gets the Social Security number based on the father’s address.”” 

“WND also reported on two separate articles published in June 1962, in the Honolulu Advertiser and the Honolulu Star-Bulletin, in which Obama Sr. stated he was leaving that month to travel to Cambridge, Mass., to begin graduate studies.”

“The story Obama told in his autobiography, “Dreams from My Father,” was that he saw his father only once after he left Hawaii to study at Harvard, during a return visit to Hawaii in 1971.”

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=287253

Donald Trump and intelligent Americans make sense, O’Reilly Beck Coulter make nonsense, Obama birth certificate natural born citizen controversy

Donald Trump and intelligent Americans make sense, O’Reilly Beck Coulter make nonsense, Obama birth certificate natural born citizen controversy

“Why has Obama, since taking the White House, used Justice Department Attorneys, at taxpayer expense,  to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

“Why do Bill O’Reilly and Glenn Beck continue to ridicule intelligent Americans who question Obama’s birth certificate and eligibility status?”…Citizen Wells

Donald Trump, who is intelligent, successful and educated in some of the finest schools, is asking the simple questions about Obama’s birth certificate and eligibility. Contrast Trump’s intelligent questions with the comments from uninformed people like Bill O’Reilly, Glenn Beck and Ann Coulter who are acting more like left wing kool aid drinkers whose strongest response is to ridicule Trump and other Americans.

From Canada Free Press April 12, 2011.

“On Hannity’s show, Coulter (who is often quite sensible) carried on about the question of Obama’s eligibility as if it were a subject that no sensible person would ever dare bring up for risk of looking like some clueless Neanderthal—as if the question of Obama’s eligibility to be POTUS had been ordained by the gods, and carved in granite long, long ago.

Coulter’s attitude is representative of the anti-birther “conservatives” who seem oblivious of the tsunami of public opinion headed their way.  Conservatives who are not prepared to surf the tsunami are going to be submerged, swept away, and sunk.

 Donald Trump’s attack-dog pursuit of the eligibility issue is going to flush out faux conservatives, controlled opposition, and brain-dead idiots like you would not believe. 

Before briefly discussing the birth certificate issue let me stress this point—Obama’s eligibility to be POTUS does not hinge on his birth certificate.  There are a whole slew of unanswered questions, nefarious relationships, and outright fabrications surrounding Obama’s past.  The question that should be front and center is “Who the h%#@l is this guy?”  

 http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2011/04/10/donald-trump-obama-investigation-passport-requirements-clarified-some-short-abstract-versions-of-birth-certificates-may-not-be-acceptable/

Read more:

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/35413

From the Right Side of Life April 12, 2011.

“First are a few key pull-quotes from arguably one of the first Tea Party organizers, Eric Odom, who recently weighed in on the eligibility issue in a short but well-written posting entitled, “Oh no… not a post about Obama’s birth certificate!“:”

“Put me in the group called “why would a sitting American President even allow the question to still exist?”
First, let me state that I think it’s a travesty to see so many in our movement insulted, mocked and discredited for asking questions about the birth certificate. I especially find it disturbing that beltway organizations (conservative) have in many cases cast out those who have questions on the subject. Even some tea party organizations tow the establishment line by refusing to allow members to openly ask the question in a calm and inquisitive manner.”

“My questions goes a bit deeper. As in, what kind of individual gets elected as President of the most powerful country in the world, then toys with Americans asking questions about his birth certificate? And worse, what kind of people sit in TV studios of “authentic media outlets,” mocking those who ask the real questions? What does it say about our Congress and Intelligence agencies that none are willing to end it all by providing an indisputable answer to the simple questions being asked?
Americans have every right to ask this question of our President. If our President doesn’t think it legitimate to be asked, and doesn’t go to every length possible to answer the question, my assertion is that he is not fit to be President of this great nation.
For me personally, it’s less about the document and more about the man behind it.”

Next, attorney Mario Apuzzo analytically responded to the now ex-Directory of Hawaii’s Health Department Dr. Chiyome Fukino’s recent interview on NBC. Once again, the posting is well worth the read; here are some key quotes:”

“Fukino no longer works for the Hawaii Department of Health. Why did Mr. Isikoff not contact the current health department director who overseas the birth certificates in Hawaii? Why do we have to hear from someone who no longer works for Hawaii and no longer has any control over or access to its vital records files? Why can we not hear from the current official who could tell us what is in the file today? …
“She found the original birth record, properly numbered, half typed and half handwritten, and signed by the doctor who delivered Obama, located in the files.”
Why does Fukino tell us that the real birth certificate showed the doctor on it but she fails to tell us that Obama’s birth occurred in a hospital which is what Obama told the public occurred? After all, she knows how much “birthers” have been demanding to see conclusive proof that Obama was born in Kapi’olani Hospital, the hospital in which Obama says he was born. There would be no violation of any privacy laws for her to simply say that he was born in a hospital, without giving the name of the hospital, just like she said that a doctor delivered Obama and signed the birth certificate. What is suspect is that there were numerous doctors at that time who could have delivered Obama but only two hospitals in which he could have been born, Kapi’olani Hospital or Queens Hospital. In other words, the doctors get lost in the shuffle but the hospitals do not. Just saying that a doctor signed the birth certificate does not open up channels of information that can be independently verified. On the other hand, knowing the birth hospital pins down the place of birth to only two specific locations in which there would be contained medical evidence of the alleged birth there. …”

Read more:

http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2011/04/12/tea-party-and-lawyer-reaction-to-recent-eligibility-news/

From Media ite April 12, 2011.

““We’re going to put this to bed tonight. He does have a legitimate birth certificate. The state of Hawaii says they have it. And we have no reason not to believe that.””

Read more:

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/bill-oreilly-tackles-myths-about-obama-and-separates-fact-from-fiction/

Watch the O’Reilly segment:

http://citizenwells.com/2011/04/13/bill-oreilly-from-citizen-wells-stop-lying-to-american-people-oreilly-wont-admit-mistake/

Obama birth announcements facts, O’Reilly Chris Matthews, Fools or propaganda ministers, Announcements prove nothing

Obama birth announcements facts, O’Reilly Chris Matthews, Fools or propaganda ministers, Announcements prove nothing

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

“Why did Bill O’Reilly use birth announcements as evidence of Obama’s birth in Hawaii and mislead the American public?”…Citizen Wells

Two documents have been touted as proof of Obama being born in Hawaii. Neither prove anything. The COLB, Certification of Live Birth, put on the internet and never proven to be authentic or having come from the State of Hawaii, could be obtained in 1961 for someone born outside of Hawaii. The birth announcements are just that. Announcement of a birth. Not proof of birth in Hawaii or the date of birth. Common sense should rule this matter.

Sadly, Chris Matthews, defacto Propaganda Minister for Obama, and Bill O’Reilly, pompous know it all on Fox, have used these documents to fool the American public.

As I stated above, common sense should dictate that a birth announcement is not equivalent to a legitimate long form birth certificate that most of us have been required to present. For those such as O’Reilly, Matthews and others without common sense or with an agenda, here is an excellent analysis of the birth announcements.

From the Daily Pen April 2, 2011.

“A new investigation of Obama’s birth announcements appearing in Hawaii’s two primary newspapers in August, 1961 shows, conclusively, they were the result of a registration record taken by the municipal health authority, not a medically verified “Live” birth documented as occurring at a Hawaiian hospital, per an officially defined “vital event” designated by the U.S. Department of Health, National Vital Statistics Division protocols.

In August, 1961, two announcements allegedly showing a “native” birth for Barack Obama were published in Hawaii’s two primary newspapers, the Sunday Advertiser and the Honolulu Star. For more than three years since Obama engaged his unvetted candidacy for the presidency, many of his supporters have mistakenly lauded these blurbish announcements as the “holy grail” of proof that he was born in the state of Hawaii.

However, a detailed investigation of the history and procedures used by Hawaii’s municipal health department, and its relationship with the newspapers, shows that not only was it a matter of official policy that Obama’s birth would have been announced in the paper regardless of where he was born, the information used to publish the announcements is not even confirmed through any eye-witness, medical authority or hospital representative in the state.

In 1961, the two newspapers shared the same address and facility which means they received only one copy of the same vital records information from the Department of Health. Therefore, the format and content of information used in “vital event” public announcements, including births, deaths, divorces and marriage applications, were published identically by both papers, including any mistakes, omissions, order or context. No investigation was carried out by the papers’ editors to determine if the information provided by the DOH was actually accurate or, in the case of birth announcements, if the address published and provided by the registrant had any association with the geographic location of the actual birth. More than 1200 birth announcements between 1960 and 1965 were shown to contain Hawaiian addresses for registrants of births outside of the state of Hawaii, including more than three hundred in which the child was born outside of the United States.”

“The Daily Pen’s, Dan Crosby, engaged a two month long research project on location in Hawaii, to, once and for all, close the door on questions about the facts and bring the long-due invalidation of the authority of these fallow Hawaiian birth announcements, in quaint, remote newspapers, to confirm Obama’s eligibility to be president.

Recall, for more than two years, major media personalities, such as Bill O’reilly, Chris Matthews and recently fired, Keith Olbermann have enjoyed a willful ignorance in support of Obama’s legitimacy while poking fun with these announcements essentially saying to their viewers that the very presence of these announcements means only one of two exclusive options: 1. They are a legitimate and accurate indication of Obama’s geographic birth in Hawaii, or 2. They are the result of some crazy 50-year-long conspiracy concocted by members of Obama’s family and newspaper editors at the time in order to enable Obama to use the announcements some time later as primary evidence that he was born in Hawaii in the event he might run for president some day.

In his investigation, Crosby found confirmed and easily accessible evidence that neither of these choices apply to Obama’s records. In fact, the explanation is far less sensational and simple that it reveals that Mr. Obama (Barry Soetoro) simply benefitted from a commonly used administrative practice in the state of Hawaii which was applied for literally thousands of births which were registered there, but which did not occur there. In doing so, Obama appears to have benefitted from a coincidental set of passive circumstances in which the choice to register his birth in Hawaii also allowed him to engage native U.S. citizenship status, not Natural Born status.

The announcements were a fringe benefit to his eligibility facade which merely occur as a consequence of the non-native birth registration process. However, the primary reason for his family registering his birth in Hawaii was to make sure he was eligible for something far less significant than the presidency.

His grandparents wanted to make sure Obama could receive state financial assistance and medical care as an infant of an unemployed, wayward teenage mother and a foreign dead-beat, alcoholic, bigamist.

“The birth announcements were printed from unconfirmed information provided to the Newspapers by the Department of Health who received the information from Obama’s grandparents, not a hospital,” says Crosby in a phone call from Oahu.

“This information was publish without the DOH or newspaper editors confirming the actual location of the birth in any hospital or location in Hawaii. I found thousands of birth registration records of children born outside of Hawaii who have their announcements published in these two newspapers.”

Crosby says this information can be determined by cross-referencing public records with birth announcements and associating the addresses with a residential directory and the natality data provided by Hawaii to the U.S. Department of Health’s U.S. Vital Records Report.

Recall that Hawaii Revised Statute 338-17.8 allows the state Health Department to register the foreign birth of any child as a native Hawaiian birth if the parents of that child can be proven to the satisfaction and criteria of the Director of the Department of Health only, they were residence of Hawaii within one year of the birth, regardless of the location of the birth. This law then mandates that the vital records registrar must register the birth with the vital records office in coordination with an official, original Hawaiian birth record. This law originated during Hawaii’s territorial era beginning with births in 1911 and was most recently revised in 1982 to allow the Health Department’s director to assume autonomous authority over the evaluation of applicants.”

Read more:

http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2011/04/final-report-obamas-birth-announcements.html

Leonard Pitts spokesman for Big Brother aka Obama attacks Trump and concerned Americans, 1984 thought police

Leonard Pitts spokesman for Big Brother aka Obama attacks Trump and concerned Americans, 1984 thought police

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

“As soon as all the corrections which happened to be necessary in any particular number of the Times had been assembled and collated, that number would be reprinted, the original copy destroyed, and the corrected copy placed on the files in it’s stead. This process of continuation alteration was applied not only to newspapers, but to books, periodicals, pamphlets, posters, leaflets, films, sound tracks, cartoons, photographs–to every kind of literature or documentation which might conceivably hold any political or ideological significance. Day by day and almost minute by minute the past was brought up to date. In this way every prediction made by the Party could be shown by documentary evidence to be correct; nor was any item of news, or expression of opinion, which conflicted with the needs of the moment, ever allowed to be on record.”…George Orwell, “1984″

Leonard Pitts actually quoted”1984″ by George Orwell in one of his articles. However, I wonder if Pitts has read “1984” or understands it’s message. The message of a totalitarian regime, complete conformity, information and mind control. Leonard Pitts, in a recent article, revealed the Obama camp’s thought police tactics when he attacked Donald Trump and concerned Americans for asking simple questions about Obama’s eligibility and birth certificate. These are the same simple questions that the NY Times asked of John McCain early in 2008 and should have asked of Obama.

From the Miami Herald March 30, 2011.

“Donald Trump doesn’t like “birthers.” He calls the word “unfair’’ to people who don’t believe President Obama was born in the USA.
Very well, then. If not birthers, how about if we call them “morons?’’ How about ‘‘jackasses,” “imbeciles,” “idiots’’ or “doofuses?” How about “pinheads’’— or would that require a royalty to Bill O’Reilly?
I’m sorry, dear reader. Forgive me. Generally speaking, I am not much for name calling.
It lowers the level of discourse, it forestalls thoughtful response and it does not suggest an excess of class. Where the birthers are concerned, however, the level of discourse is already lower than Neptune’s basement, a thoughtful response is about as likely as Miami snow on the Fourth of July, and I will just have to chance the loss of class.”

“But this ongoing birther garbage, like the ongoing controversy about his supposed secret Muslim identity — is not about criticism. It is not about what he has done but, rather, what he is.
Like “state’s rights,” these controversies are a code, a dog whistle for those with ears to hear. They provide euphemistic cover for those who want to express alarm over the raw newness of him, the sweeping demographic changes he represents (‘‘He’s black! Oh, my God, they’ve got the presidency now!’’) without appearing uncouth enough to do so.
Memo to the morons: It doesn’t work, folks. Nobody is fooled. You are about as subtle as Lady Gaga.
It is telling that the white candidate who was, in fact, not born in the USA (Sen. John McCain was born in the Panama Canal Zone, if anyone is interested) did not face these questions, while the black one who was born in Hawaii has been unable to escape them.

 
This, even though Obama provided his birth certificate and its authenticity has repeatedly been vouched for by Hawaiian officials.”

“This, even though his Aug. 4, 1961 birth was noted by contemporaneous (memo to the morons: that means it happened at the time) birth announcements in not one, but two Hawaii newspapers. What’d he do? Jump in a time machine, zip back to the ’60s and plant the notices? “

Read more:

http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/03/29/2140199/donald-trump-and-the-birthers.html

Speaking of Morons.

Put Leonard Pitts at the top of the list.

He has no command of the facts about Obama’s birth and birth certificate and his best response is to attack anyone questioning Obama, despite the fact that McCain had real documentation and presented it when challenged.

First of all Obama has presented no legitimate birth certificate as McCain did. The questionable Certification of Live Birth, which does not prove Hawaii birth, was never authenticated or proved to have come from the State of Hawaii.

Then Pitts pulls an O’Reilly and mentions the birth announcement being in two newspapers. First of all, they had a reciprocal agreement which means that an ad in one automatically went in the other. Secondly, they were the announcement of a birth, not a birth certificate, without documenting location, date and time.

The way that Donald Trump and many others have been attacked for asking simple questions about Obama reminds me of the Two Minute hate in “1984.”

“As usual, the face of Emmanuel Goldstein, the Enemy of the people, had flashed onto the screen. There were hisses here and there among the audience. The little sandyhaired woman gave a squeak of mingled fear and disgust. Goldstein was the renegade and backslider who once, long ago (how long ago, nobody quite remembered), had been one of the leading figures of the party, almost on a level with Big Brother himself, and then had engaged in counterrevolutionary activities , had been condemned to death, and had mysteriously escaped and disappeared. The program of the Two Minutes Hate varied from day to day, but there was none in which Goldstein was not the principal figure. He was the primal traitor, the earliest defiler of the Party’s purity. All subsequent crimes against the Party, all treacheries, acts of sabotage, heresies, deviations, sprang directly out of his teaching. Somewhere or other he was still alive and hatching his conspiracies: perhaps somewhere beyond the sea, under the protection of his foreign paymasters; perhaps even–so it was occasionally rumored–in some hiding place in Oceania itself.”
 

“Goldstein was delivering his usual venomous attack upon the doctrines of the Party–an attack so exaggerated and perverse that a child should have been able to see through it, and yet just plausible enough to fill one with an alarmed feeling that other people, less level-headed than oneself, might be taken in by it. He was abusing Big Brother, he was denouncing the dictatorship of the Party, he was demanding the immediate conclusion of peace with Eurasia, he was advocating freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, freedom of thought”
“Before the Hate had proceeded for thirty seconds, uncontrollable exclamations of rage were breaking out from half the people in the room.”
“In it’s second minute the Hate rose to a frenzy. People were leaping up and down in their places and shouting at the tops of their voices”

Trump questions Obama and gets attacked, Racist Orwellian attacks from Leonard Pitts and Whoopi Goldberg, Obama birth certificate eligibility

Trump questions Obama and gets attacked, Racist Orwellian attacks from Leonard Pitts and Whoopi Goldberg, Obama birth certificate eligibility

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

“Why did Bill O’Reilly use birth announcements as evidence of Obama’s birth in Hawaii and mislead the American public?”…Citizen Wells

Before I respond to the racist and Owellian rants of people like Leonard Pitts and Whoppi Goldberg, it is fitting that I reprint an article from December 1, 2009 on Citizen Wells.

“And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed
–if all records told the same tale–then the lie passed into
history and became truth. “Who controls the past,” ran the
Party slogan, “controls the future: who controls the present
controls the past.”…George Orwell, “1984″

This is a two part article. The first part deals with engineered and unintentinal brainwashing coming from the Orwellian Obama Camp. The second part is in response to an article produced by the London Mail Online, in the home of my ancestors. History does, indeed, repeat. I write this as a descendant of British citizens who left the tyranny of Europe, who as Americans saw through the BS of British tryanny. Now I am compelled, as my ancestors were, to sift through more BS coming from the British Isles. I quote their native son George Orwell in this endeavor.

Part 1: Obama Camp Orwellian mind control

George Orwell watched as the mind control schemes of Nazi Germany played out to insure the German people were compliant with their plans for world domination. Orwell used these techniques from Nazi Germany and other totalitarian regimes as a basis for “1984.” For example, from Joeseph Goebbels, the Nazi Propaganda Minister:

 “Not every item of news should be published: rather must
those who control news policies endeavor to make every item
of news serve a certain purpose.”

Next, from “1984.”

“The past, he reflected, had not merely been altered, it had
actually been destroyed. For how could you establish, even
the most obvious fact when there existed no record outside
your own memory?”

After watching the Obama camp early in 2008 control the Mainstream Media and attack people speaking out against Obama, including an orchestrated attack on this blog, it became apparent that we had entered the age of Big Brother written about by George Orwell. Many articles have been presented on this blog comparing the Obama camp and administration to the totalitarian regime of “1984.”

For the purpose of this article, I will concentrate on the eligibility issues surrounding Barack Obama. This one issue exemplifies how the Obama camp has expended enormous resources to shape public thought and masterfully divert attention away from the critical issue of Obama being a usurper, in direct conflict with the US Constitution.

One thing is crystal clear. The Obama camp has controlled the Mainstream Media from the beginning. There are many reason for this. It is a fact. This has been the principle means they have used to not cover important issues and to select the buzzwords and slogans to be used. Birther, fringe and other words have been selected to discredit and demean those speaking out against Obama. Also, another technique straight out of Nazi Germany and “1984″ was employed. In Nazi Germany, the focus of hate was the Jews. In “1984″ the “two minute hates” were directed at Goldstein (correction), the supposed antagonist of Big Brother and the nation.

So we have the Obama camp continually broadcasting that anyone challenging Obama’s eligibility is a fringe birther, right wing extremist and as many of the so called elitists would portray as a sub human low intellect. That Orly Taitz is the leader of the birthers and that all court cases challenging Obama’s eligibility have been thrown out as having no merits. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Most people questioning Obama’s eligibility are normal, hard working Americans who follow the US Constitution as their legal compass. They are people like me who are well educated, well read and non racially motivated. They are current or retired military and some high ranking officers. There are a few in the MSM, such as Lou Dobbs who asked the common sense question of why doesn’t Obama simply provide a legitimate birth certificate.

Now for the questions that transcends all of the psycho babble and mind control. I have placed it as number 1 on the Internet Billboard because it is so simple and self evident.

“1. Barack Obama has employed a legion of private and government attorneys to prevent revealing his country of birth. Innocent and eligible persons seeking the office of president do not do that.”

The answer is obvious.

Part 2: What motivated the Mail Online to create or repeat lies?

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”…Joseph Goebbels

First of all, I want to thank the British press for covering aspects of Barack Obama untouched by the American MSM. I am certain it did not harm your readership.

Next, what was your motivation for covering an important story about Obama’s eligibility issues and including so much misinformation and lies? Perhaps you are proving my point with the quotes from Orwell and Goebbels serving as a spotlight.

  • Is this the result of pressure or remuneration from the Obama Camp ot those controlling the puppet strings?
  • Are you repeating the lie that has become the “truth”?
  • Or is this simply crass commercialism?
  • Or possibly all three above?

I will next respond to selected exerpts from your article, “Did Barack Obama lie about his birth to become President?”.

“To most Americans, of course, the very idea that anyone could cheat their way into the world’s most powerful post by rewriting their personal history sounds preposterous.

They dismiss the Birthers as a bunch of crackpot conspiracy theorists and closet racists who still cannot accept a black leader, even though Obama won the election by some 10 million votes.
Yet the number of people who believe this apparently outlandish theory is extraordinarily high, particularly in the southern states, where old racial divisions endure.

According to one recent opinion poll, an astonishing 53 per cent of southerners are either convinced their President really is a covert foreigner, or at least feel unsure about the matter. In more integrated parts of the country, the doubters remain a small minority.”

Citizen Wells response:

Life is full of ironies. I write this, a child of the British Isles, as I suppose you are. My English ancestors left the tyranny of Europe and settled in NC. They embraced their new found freedoms and easily saw through the BS being imposed on them by the British Government. My ancestor, John Wells, was a signer of the Tryon Resolves.

“The unprecedented, barbarous and bloody actions committed by British troops on our American brethren near Boston, on 19th April and 20th of May last, together with the hostile operations and treacherous designs now carrying on, by the tools of ministerial vengeance, for the subjugation of all British America, suggest to us the painful necessity of having recourse to arms in defense of our National freedom and constitutional rights, against all invasions; and at the same time do solemnly engage to take up arms and risk our lives and our fortunes in maintaining the freedom of our country whenever the wisdom and counsel of the Continental Congress or our Provincial Convention shall declare it necessary;”

Here is my point. We have some large cities in the south. However, passed from generation to generation, we have retained the inclination and ability to see throgh modern day BS and tyranny. Those of you in Great Britain have had 250 years to learn this. Is this clear? Except for a small percentage of the population, this is not about skin color. It is about Tyranny. Clear?

“After reading about the Birthers, he met the fringe group’s self-anointed leader, Orly Taitz, 47, a one-woman phenomenon who emigrated to America from the former Soviet Union (via Israel), speaks five languages, and is a qualified dentist with two practices, as well as being an attorney.”

Citizen Wells response:

Here we go again, “fringe group.” Orly Taitz is one of many attorneys involved in lawsuits challenging Obama’s eligibility and she is not the leader. This is a grassroots, US Consitutional issue.

 ”Like every other such case, it was summarily dismissed on procedural grounds even before the evidence could be heard. However absurd such cases may be, Mr Sankey, who works for the group voluntarily and estimates having spent £40,000 of his own money following leads, is at pains to present himself as a level-headed former British bobby, motivated only by a determination to find the truth.”

Citizen Wells response:

Every case has not been dismissed.  “However absurd such cases may be,” leads one to believe that this article was influenced by the Obama camp.

“It is a sad irony, though, that so many Americans feel sufficiently dissatisfied by their first black President that they would rather put their trust in a British detective and his curious conspiracy theories.” 

Citizen Wells response:

The decline of the British Empire.

Times Online article:

http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/news/article-1231542/Barack-Obama-British-detective-Neil-Sankey-claims-lied-birth-President.html

I will leave you with the following quote which perhaps conveys the message best:

“When you pick up your morning or evening newspaper and think
you are reading the news of the world, what you are reading
is a propaganda which has been selected, revised, and doctored
by some power which has a financial interest in you.” …Upton Sinclair

Bill O’Reilly Trump interview reveals agenda or incompetence, O’Reilly mislead Americans, O’Reilly should be fired and Fox punished

 Bill O’Reilly Trump interview reveals agenda or incompetence, O’Reilly mislead Americans, O’Reilly should be fired and Fox punished

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

“Why did Bill O’Reilly use birth announcements as evidence of Obama’s birth in Hawaii and mislead the American public?”…Citizen Wells

On at least two occasions prior to age eighteen I was required to present an official, stamped, long form birth certificate obtained from the county of my birth in NC. Imagine someone on the Fox Network, which purports to be fair and balanced, someone who claims to do research and ask probing questions, using a birth announcement as proof of birth in a specific location on a specific date. Not just proof of birth for someone playing little league but someone who ran for and now occupies the White House. Well folks, we have such a person in Bill O’Reilly and he admitted it during the Donald Trump interview on Fox on March 30, 2011. Are you feeling really good about Fox?

Let’s pause for a moment and analyze what a birth announcement is…………….

It’s a birth announcement, not a birth certificate!

If you are new to this or have been fooled by people like O’Reilly on TV, remember this important fact. We have no legitimate documentation of the location or date of Obama’s birth. The date of August 4 could easily have been supplied by Obama’s parent or grandparent.

O’Reilly and Fox have not been fair and balanced and have not fully covered the tough issues surrounding Obama such as eligibility and deeper ties to Chicago corruption.

From Citizen Wells September 4, 2008.

“Bottom line. O’Reilly did a lousy job. He gave Obama the questions he has rehearsed time and time again. What right does O’Reilly have to state that Obama was right about his earlier position on Iraq. Obama is a pathological liar and therefore has no discernable position.”

Read more:

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/09/04/bill-oreilly-interviews-obama-fox-news-obama-met-with-fox-news-executives-washington-post-sept-2-2008/

In July 2009 Bill O’Reilly had the following to say about Lou Dobbs and the Obama birth certificate controversy.

“Impact segment tonight all has to do with the call for CNN commentator Lou Dobbs to be fired. It has to do with Mr. Dobbs allowing conversation on his program that alleges President Obama is not a U.S. citizen. Now this theory has been around for a while. The Factor investigated and found this theory bogus but Mr. Dobbs is still engaged…Again we found that President Obama was born in Hawaii. We were sent the documents, what do you got to do. I don’t know why it’s still around that was more than a year ago.”

From Citizen Wells October 9, 2009.

“Neither O’Reilly or his female fawners, who agreed the case was frivolous and that Orly Taitz deserved what she got, have done sufficient research to make an intelligent, informed comment on the subject.
I criticize Bill O’Reilly for pontificating on a subject that he knows little about.

I also criticize O’Reilly for shooting the messenger.”

Read more:

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2009/10/28/bill-oreilly-orly-taitz-fox-obama-judge-land-case-frivolous-taitz-fined-20000-lis-wiel-kimberly-guilfoil-oreilly-factor-no-spin-oreilly-shooting-messenger-oreilly-coward-obama/

From Citizen Wells February 15, 2010.

“Fox News, long thought to be the only network covering the news, especially regarding Obama, his agenda, his past and his associations, is increasingly becoming suspect as being controlled by the Saudis and Obama Administration.”

“In a move which openly and shamelessly manifests FOX’s anti-American agenda, the former conservative news agency has launched a propaganda campaign against U.S. Citizens who, having announced their candidacy for State Governor in their home states, also question the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to hold the office of U.S. President.
In an unsigned report published at their website, on Friday, Feb. 12, 2010, Fox News takes aim at Georgia Gubernatorial Candidate Nathan Deal and Texas Gubernatorial Candidate Debra Medina.”

“By this statement, FOX has made it absolutely clear to America that they will not tolerate anyone who will not work with Obama and be respectful to him.

This move by FOX comes less than a month after a member of the Saudi Royalty, Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, a nephew of the King of Saudi Arabia, announced his desire to forge closer ties with Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation, the parent of FOX.”

“So, why didn’t the pompous jackass O’Reilly ask Blagojevich about any of these charges?

So, Bill O’Reilly, why are you and Fox covering for Obama on his eligibilty issues and ties to Chicago corruption?

Bill O’Reilly, which of the following apply to you?

Incompetent

Biased

Bought out or controlled by Fox, Obama or the Saudis”

Read more:

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2010/02/15/fox-news-has-joined-big-brother-oreilly-rod-blagojevich-interview-obama-eligibility-obama-birth-certificate-obama-not-natural-born-citizen-fox-owned-by-saudis-fox-bought-or-threatened-by-obam/

Millions of viewers trusted Fox and Bill O’Reilly in 2008. When O’Reilly said that he investigated Obama’s birth and birth certificate, they believed him. It is my opinion that Glenn Beck also trusted O’Reilly on this. Bill O’Reilly should be fired, Fox punished and there must be a congressional investigation.

O’Reilly Donald Trump interview, March 30, 2011, Obama birth certificate, Trump birth certificate, O’Reilly response

O’Reilly Donald Trump interview, March 30, 2011, Obama birth certificate, Trump birth certificate, O’Reilly response

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

“It is a little bit odd there were hospitals named after Mr Obama in Ghana, but none in New York.”…Michael Cohen, Donald Trump attorney

Bill O’Reilly the pompous bloviator has consistently insulted anyone questioning Obama’s eligibility and the birth certificate controversy. O’Reilly claimed that he thoroughly investigated  and that Obama was born in Hawaii. Please share your so called proof with us.

O’Reilly will interview Donald Trump tonight, Wednesday, March 30, 2011. Will Trump continue to ask the simple probing questions about Obama’s birth certificate and eligibility? What will be O’Reilly’s response?

From Media Matters March 30, 2011.

“I’m sure it will be just a matter of time now before Bill O’Reilly and Glenn Beck take to the Fox News airwaves to ridicule Donald Trump, who’s been out making easy headlines peddling the debunked birther conspiracy theory.

I’m sure O’Reilly and Beck will take aim at Trump, even though the rest of Fox News is cheering the misguided billionaire on, because, as Media Matters has noted, both Fox hosts are on the record condemning the birth certificate talk.
During the summer of 2009 when Lou Dobbs was doing what Trump is doing now (albeit while anchoring a CNN news show), O’Reilly dismissed the birther talk [emphasis added]:

That theory has been around for a while. The Factor investigated, found out it’s bogus. But Mr. Dobbs is still engaged.

Again, we found out that President Obama was born in Hawaii. We were sent the documents. And what are you gonna do? I don’t know why it’s still around.”

Read more:

http://mediamatters.org/blog/201103300009

O’Reilly Obama narcissism match, Superbowl Sunday, February 6, 2011, Me me me

O’Reilly Obama narcissism match, Superbowl Sunday, February 6, 2011, Me me me

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

“Why did the Illinois Senate Health & Human Services Committee, with Obama as chairman, create and push Bill 1332, “Illinois Health Facilities Planning Act,” early in 2003, which reduced the number of members on the Board from 15 to 9, just prior to rigging by Tony Rezko and Rod Blagojevich?”…Citizen Wells

“If I had my choice I would kill every reporter in the world but I am sure we would be getting reports from hell before breakfast.”… William Tecumseh Sherman

Bill O’Reilly and Barack Obama will be holding their narcissim competition today, Superbowl Sunday, February 6, 2011. Some refer to this as an interview. I don’t understand why. O’Reilly hasn’t asked a decent question of Obama yet.

Consider the following articles from Citizen Wells.

September 4, 2008

“Bill O’Reilly has interviewed Barack Obama. The interview airs tonight, Thursday, Sept 4, 2008, the night of John McCain’s speech. Will O’Reilly ask Obama any substantive questions? The snippet I heard a short while ago was a cookie cutter fluff question.
The Washington Post came out with an article on Sept 2, 2008. The article states that the interview was the result of a meeting Obama had with Fox executives 3 months ago.”

““During the sit-down in a Waldorf-Astoria hotel suite in Manhattan that included Rupert Murdoch, the network’s owner, Obama expressed concern about the way Fox was covering him. “I just wanted to know if I’m going to get a fair shake from Fox News Channel,” Ailes recalled him saying.”

“Verdict:
O’Reilly and Fox sold out.
O’Reilly begins with Obama being right about Iraq and then asks for Obama to admit he was wrong about the surge.
O’Reilly and Fox are a joke.”

Read more:

 
http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/09/04/bill-oreilly-interviews-obama-fox-news-obama-met-with-fox-news-executives-washington-post-sept-2-2008/

October 28, 2009

“Bill O’Reilly, who has a sinecure, maligned Orly Taitz and anyone questioning the eligibility of Barack Obama last night, October 27, 2009, on his Fox TV show.
O’Reilly is well known for being a pompous ass.
Last night, Bill O’Reilly was a coward.
Neither O’Reilly or his female fawners, who agreed the case was frivolous and that Orly Taitz deserved what she got, have done sufficient research to make an intelligent, informed comment on the subject.
I criticize Bill O’Reilly for pontificating on a subject that he knows little about.
I also criticize O’Reilly for shooting the messenger.”

Read more:

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2009/10/28/bill-oreilly-orly-taitz-fox-obama-judge-land-case-frivolous-taitz-fined-20000-lis-wiel-kimberly-guilfoil-oreilly-factor-no-spin-oreilly-shooting-messenger-oreilly-coward-obama/

February 17, 2010

Has O’Reilly asked Obama any tough questions about any of the following?

“Why has the MSM and Fox News ignored the other counts of corruption against Rod Blagojevich, the same corruption tied to Obama, Rezko, Levine, Weinstein, et al? Why has the MSM and Fox only covered the alleged attempt to sell Obama’s old senate seat?
 
Bill O’Reilly and Glenn Beck continue to insult concerned Americans who question Obama’s eligibility. They refer to them as birthers and right wing nuts. However, even Lou Dobbs while still at CNN asked why Obama doesn’t present a legitimate birth certificate.
I have tried to make this simple enough even for the bloviating idiots O’Reilly and Beck. On February 14, 2010, the Citizen Wells blog presented this simple, uncomplicated information.”

Read more:

 
http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2010/02/17/fox-news-bill-oreilly-and-glenn-beck-protect-obama-saudi-pressure-obama-threats-obama-money-obama-eligibility-obama-corruption-ties-blagojevich-indictment-rezko-levine-weinstein-obama-a/

Not only has Bill O’Reilly not asked Obama any tough questions, he questioned Lou Dobbs when he asked the basic, simple journalistic question.

It’s all about Bill O’Reilly.

It’s all about Obama.

O’Reilly the narcissist interviews Obama the narcissist, Bill O’Reilly has protected Obama, Tell your friends

O’Reilly the narcissist interviews Obama the narcissist, Bill O’Reilly has protected Obama, Tell your friends

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

“Why has Bill O’Reilly continued to insult Americans who question Obama’s eligibility and not asked the simple journalistic questions about Obama?”

Why has Obama agreed to be interviewed by Bill O’Reilly on Superbowl Sunday? Because birds of a feather, narcissists, flock together, and he knows that it is all about O’Reilly and not getting at the truth.

It is obvious to even the casual observer that Obama is a narcissist. Here is a great article about O’Reilly from News Hounds.

“A “Narcissistic Personality” is one who has a “grandiose sense of self importance” and who “expects to be recognized as superior.” These characteristics would seem to describe Bill O’Reilly whose greatest fan is Bill O’Reilly. Bill’s ego (and one assumes other body parts) appears to have a pathological need to be “stroked.” (ewww) As such, his interview segment on August 10th, was yet another shameless display of America’s narcissistic Daddy’s self promotion while seeking the adulation of others. And like “culture warriors” and a new Factor segment, “Dumb and Dumber” (which features Juliette Huddy and another young woman whose first name is Faith) it was yet another “threesome” in which Bill got to play the alpha male – which could be part of the “authoritarian” aspect of narcissism.”

Read more:

http://www.newshounds.us/2009/08/14/bill_oreillys_narcissism_shines_through_once_again.php
 

We have made great strides in getting the truth out about Obama. Now is the time to take it to the next level. Once again I refer to the concept of “six degrees of separation.”

“Six degrees of separation is the theory that anyone on the planet can be connected to any other person on the planet through a chain of acquaintances that has no more than five intermediaries. ”

This is powerful. However, the message must be concise, easy to understand and not debatable. This is what I recommend.

  • Ask the question: “Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?
  • Inform them that Neil Abercrombie, the new Governor of Hawaii, could find no record of a birth certificate there.
  • Inform them that Tim Adams, an election official in Hawaii in 2008, has signed an affidavit stating that there was no birth certificate for Obama in Hawaii in 2008.
  • Ask them why Bill O’Reilly has not asked questions about any of the above and why he questioned Lou Dobbs for asking simple questions.
  • Tell them to contact their congressmen and demand an investigation.

Lou Dobbs, while still on CNN, asked the simple, obvious question about Obama’s birth certificate. Bill O’Reilly attempts to make him appear foolish for doing so.