Lin Wood responds to ad hominem attacks in legal docs Liberte v Reid Jan – Feb 2021, Wood: “credible evidence” GA officials Pence Rosenstein Roberts, No retraction demands

Lin Wood responds to ad hominem attacks in legal docs Liberte v Reid Jan – Feb 2021, Wood: “credible evidence” GA officials Pence Rosenstein Roberts, No retraction demands

“Ad Hominem: This fallacy occurs when, instead of addressing someone’s argument or position, you irrelevantly attack the person or some aspect of the person who is making the argument. The fallacious attack can also be direct to membership in a group or institution.”…Dept. of Philosophy, Texas State

“in phone conversation in 8/19, Justice John Roberts stated that he would make sure “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.” Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out.”...Attorney Lin Wood

“And why is Fox News working so hard to kill this story? I wish I could say more “about Fox’s behind-the-scenes treachery — and someday hopefully I will — but rest assured that Malia Zimmerman’s May 17, 2017 story about Mr. Rich was fully vetted by senior Fox management. I repeatedly encouraged Fox’s attorneys to postpone settlement discussions with Seth Rich’s parents until I obtained the FBI records (my client, Ed Butowsky, was a co-defendant with Fox), but Fox was hellbent on settling the case in October / November. That’s around the time Rupert Murdoch publicly joined forces with Joe Biden. Fox had a very strong defense, yet it rolled over and played dead, settling the lawsuit and then firing Ms. Zimmerman. Sooner or later, the full story will come out, and it will be very ugly for Fox News and the Murdoch family.”...Attorney Ty Clevenger

 

Highly irregular.

Used often in Perry Mason episodes and if ever appropriate in a real court case, I would think in the following.

From

ROSLYN LA LIBERTE,
Plaintiff,
v JOY REID

US District Court Eastern District NY

And in particular, the ad hominem attacks against Attorney Lin Wood in an attempt to remove his Pro Hac Vice admission in the case.

From the transcript of teleconference proceedings January 11, 2021.

Attorney Reichman for the defense:

MR. REICHMAN: Your Honor — I’m sorry.
There is another matter that we’d like to bring to the
Court’s attention, and it involves Mr. Wood,
plaintiff’s lead counsel. Over the weekend, we have
come across some very disturbing information about the
conduct of Mr. Wood. I’m sure you’re aware that since
the election, Mr. Wood has been actively engaged in attempting to overturn the election results. All of
those cases have been dismissed. There have also been
sanctions and disqualification motions filed.
MR. WOOD: I have not been sanctioned.
MR. REICHMAN: Now Mr. Wood —
THE COURT: One at a time.
MR. REICHMAN: — has taken an even far
darker turn. He is actively and has actively supported
the insurrection against our government and called for
the execution of the Vice President.
MR. WOOD: Oh, nonsense.
MR. REICHMAN: He’s been permanently barred
from Twitter and his recent attempt to submit a post on
Parler calling for the Vice President’s execution was
not permitted. In fact, the posting of his tweet on
Parler was one of the reasons cited by Apple and Google
to ban Parler from their platforms. The right to
appear pro hac vice in this District is a privilege and
not a right, and we believe there are at least three
reasons why that privilege should be revoked by the
Court.”

Read more:

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nyed.422819/gov.uscourts.nyed.422819.64.13.pdf

Attorney Reichman’s accusations are extensive.

From Attorney Lin Wood’s response February 9, 2021.

“I have also received credible evidence of serious wrongdoing by high-ranking
government officials which I have brought to the attention of the public and to federal law enforcement officials. The evidence of wrongdoing includes evidence of potentially serious crimes perpetrated by the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court.”

“I exercised my right of free speech and did urge attendees to consider engaging in acts of non-violent freedom of assembly and the right to publicly protest acts and inactions by the Georgia Governor and Secretary of State. I am in
possession of credible evidence supporting criminal acts by these Georgia officials.”

“I am in possession of credible evidence to support my statements about Pence and Rod Rosenstein, as well as information about the death of Seth Rich.”

“I have credible evidence to support the truth of my description of Former Vice President Pence as a traitor.”

“I have turned over whistleblower evidence to the United States Secret Service related to Former Vice-President Mike Pence and other high-ranking government officials. If desired by this Court, I am prepared to file that evidence along with a considerable amount of evidence of election fraud. I am not doing so at this time as I do not believe those issues are relevant to the
present motion which I believe is nothing more than an effort to smear my reputation and interfere with Plaintiff’s Constitutional right to counsel of her choice.”

“I have not received a retraction demand from Justice Roberts or his counsel and he has not made any claim to date that my posts are false and defamatory. Former Vice President Mike Pence or Rod Rosenstein have not sent retraction demands or claims that my posts of and concerning them are false and defamatory.”

Read more:

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nyed.422819/gov.uscourts.nyed.422819.66.3.pdf

What is significant about the above aside from the extensive efforts to discredit Wood?

1. Attorney Lin Wood stated in court documents that he has proof and will furnish it upon request.
2. Attorney Wood stated he has received no retraction demands.

Truth is often stranger than fiction.

Stay tuned.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

 

 

Pennsylvania members of US House of Representatives Dan Meuser et al statement regarding certification of electors December 31, 2020, PA unlawful actions

Pennsylvania members of US House of Representatives Dan Meuser et al statement regarding certification of electors December 31, 2020, PA unlawful actions

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

“The matrix below indicates that significant irregularities occurred across all six battleground states and across all six dimensions of election irregularities. This finding lends credence to the claim that the election may well have been stolen from President Donald J. Trump.”…Peter Navarro report

“Urges the United States Congress to declare the selection of presidential electors in this Commonwealth to be in dispute.” PA House Resolution 1094

 

From US Representative Dan Meuser of Pennsylvania December 31, 2020.

“PENNSYLVANIA MEMBERS OF CONGRESS RELEASE STATEMENT REGARDING CERTIFICATION OF ELECTORS

December 31, 2020

Press Release

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Pennsylvania members of the U.S. House of Representatives including Congressman Dan Meuser (PA-9), Congressman Glenn ‘GT’ Thompson (PA-15), Congressman Mike Kelly (PA-16), Congressman Scott Perry (PA-10), Congressman Lloyd Smucker (PA-11), Congressman Guy Reschenthaler (PA-14), Congressman John Joyce (PA-13), and Congressman Fred Keller (PA-12) released the following joint statement:

“The United States Constitution is unambiguous in declaring that state legislatures are the entity with authority to set election procedure – 

“Article 1, Section 4, Clause 1: The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof…

“Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2: Each state shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors…

“Unfortunately, the many unlawful actions undertaken by the Pennsylvania Governor’s office, the Secretary of State, and what has been described as a rogue Pennsylvania Supreme Court exceeded and circumvented the state legislature’s clear constitutional authority.

“The unlawful actions include, but are not limited to:

• Accepting ballots past 8:00 pm on Election Day
• Not properly requiring signatures to match those on mail-in ballots or requiring dates
  • Meanwhile, the matching of signatures was required at a polling site
• Authorizing the curing of mail-in ballots with less than a 24-hour’s notice
  • Only some counties were informed and adhered to this order leaving voters treated unequally from county to county
• Authorizing the use of unsecure drop boxes, which is not permitted in statute
• Prohibiting certified poll watchers overseeing the canvassing of ballots in Philadelphia

“These unlawful actions were taken without the authority or consent of the Pennsylvania state legislature. These are facts, and they are indisputable.

“Additionally, the Pennsylvania Attorney General did nothing with regard to these unlawful activities. Not one inquiry, no questioning, and certainly no investigations. Not to mention that hundreds, if not thousands, of affidavits outlining election complaints and potential fraud were documented, submitted, and ignored. The Pennsylvania election could be summed up as a free-for-all with no oversight and different standards applied throughout the Commonwealth. It is also very apparent that the unlawful actions described were concentrated in heavily populated, Democrat-led counties.

“By definition, such unlawful, unregulated, and inconsistent activities resulted in a highly questionable and inaccurate vote total. The scope of these inaccuracies cannot be known until the legal ballots are identified and counted, and the illegal ballots are disqualified. This has not been done.

“Therefore, the state’s official certification of electors was based upon a flawed system and an inaccurate vote count. Thus, very possibly resulting in an erroneous certification.

“Until these unlawful practices are acknowledged and corrected, we cannot agree to support electors chosen based upon an inaccurate total vote count. The voters of Pennsylvania deserve integrity in the election process and equal protection under the law.

“This very unfortunate, volatile, and distressing situation is due to the lack of respect and regard for the law and the U.S. Constitution as well as the Pennsylvania State Constitution. Additionally, the failure of Pennsylvania’s justice system to seek the truth, rather than stay silent, allowed these irregular, unlawful actions to create a high level of mistrust in the process as well as a potentially flawed outcome.

“If there is an American ideal that all citizens, regardless of party affiliation, can agree upon is that we must have election integrity. Election integrity is the only way to ensure trust in our elections and it is accomplished by adhering to our Constitution and the law.””

https://meuser.house.gov/media/press-releases/pennsylvania-members-congress-release-statement-regarding-certification

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

PA judge McCullough: “Petitioners….likelihood to succeed on the merits”, Memorandum of Opinion Nov 27, “likelihood of success on the merits of its Pennsylvania Constitutional claim”

PA judge McCullough: “Petitioners….likelihood to succeed on the merits”, Memorandum of Opinion Nov 27, “likelihood of success on the merits of its Pennsylvania Constitutional claim”

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

 

From the

Memorandum of Opinion by Judge McCullough

Filed November 27, 2020

Petitioners appear to have established alikelihood to succeed on the merits because Petitioners have asserted the Constitution does not provide a mechanism for the legislature to allow for expansion of absentee voting without a constitutional amendment. Petitioners appear to have a viable claim that the mail-in ballot procedures set forth in Act 77 contravene Pa. Const. Article VII Section 14 as the plain language of that constitutional provision is at odds with the mail-in provisions of Act 77. Since this presents an issue of law
which has already been thoroughly briefed by the parties, this Court can state that Petitioners have a likelihood of success on the merits of its Pennsylvania
Constitutional claim.

Without the emergency relief ordered by this Court, there would be the
likelihood of irreparable harm to Petitioners. As to Petitioner Kelly, although it
appears that he gained the most votes in the election for the office he seeks, that
result has yet to be certified. Further, he may suffer irreparable harm prospectively should he seek election to public office in the future. If what may be an unconstitutional mail-in voting process remains extant, such mail-in ballots may make the difference as to whether he is successful or not.

As to Petitioners Parnell and Logan, mail-in ballots may have made the
difference as to whether they have won or lost their respective elections. Hence, their fates may well turn upon the constitutionality of Act 77. The other voters in this case assert their constitutional voting rights as citizens of Pennsylvania would be irreparably harmed.

Conversely, since the relief ordered by the Court is on an emergency
basis, Respondents face no irreparable harm. In any event, the matter of irreparable harm would have been assessed at the evidentiary hearing.

The relief ordered by this Court is also in the public interest. Any
claim that the voters of this Commonwealth are disenfranchised by this Court’s order are spurious. The Order at issue does nothing more than preserve the status quo pending further and immediate review. That being said, this Court is mindful that one of the alternative reliefs noted by Petitioners would cause the
disenfranchisement of the nearly seven million Pennsylvanians who voted in the
2020 General Election. Specifically, Respondents claim that a temporary stay would disenfranchise voters as the legislature would appoint the electors to the Election College. However, as noted, the legislature is not authorized to appoint the electors to the Electoral College until December 8, the “Federal Safe Harbor” date for certifying results for presidential electors. The Court agrees it would be untenable for the legislature to appoint the electors where an election has already occurred, if the majority of voters who did not vote by mail entered their votes in accord with a constitutionally recognized method, as such action would result in the disenfranchisement of every voter in the Commonwealth who voted in this election – not only those whose ballots are being challenged due to the constitutionality of Act 77. However, this is not the only equitable remedy available in a matter which hinges upon upholding a most basic constitutional right of the people to a fair and free election. Hence, Respondents have not established that greater harm will result in providing emergency relief, than the harm suffered by the public due to the results of a purportedly unconstitutional election.5

For all of the above reasons, the Court respectfully submits that the
emergency preliminary injunction was properly issued and should be upheld pending an expedited emergency evidentiary hearing.”

Read more:

https://www.scribd.com/document/486132522/Memorandum-Opinion-Filed-in-Pennsylvania-by-Judge-McCullough-Election-Likely-Unconstitutional#from_embed

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

MI election fraud: Zachary Larsen 8 yr assistant AG exposes fraud while AG Dana Nessel threatens whistleblowers, Sidney Powell lawsuit v Trump Derangement Syndrome

MI election fraud: Zachary Larsen 8 yr assistant AG exposes fraud while AG Dana Nessel threatens whistleblowers, Sidney Powell lawsuit v Trump Derangement Syndrome

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“The comments made accusations of racism and threatened me and members of my family,”   “The Wayne County election had serious process flaws which deserve investigation. I continue to ask for information to assure Wayne County voters that these elections were conducted fairly and accurately. Despite repeated requests I have not received the requisite information and believe an additional 10 days of canvas by the State Board of canvassers will help provide the information necessary.”...Monica Palmer affidavit

 

The duty of Michigan Attorney Dana Nessel and indeed that of any state AG is to uphold the law.

Apparently Nessel, infected with Trump Derangement Syndrome, is unable to do her duty and instead threatens whistleblowers who are doing her job of exposing election fraud and corruption.

From Citizen Wells November 27, 2020.

“Not only did Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel not do her duties, but she attempted to cover up election fraud by trying to silence a journalist.

From One America News November 10, 2020.

“Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has reportedly threatened a journalist for exposing voter-fraud in her state.

On Tuesday, reports found Nessel sent a ‘cease and desist‘ order to Shane Trejo of Big League Politics over his reports called ‘Detroit Leaks.‘””

“Compare the revelations in the video to the recently filed Sidney Powell lawsuit with numerous witness allegations.

The first is from Zachary Larsen, Michigan Assistant Attorney General from 2012 through 2020:

87. The GLJC Complaint alleges the Detroit Election Commission “systematically
processed and counted ballots from voters whose name failed to appear in either the Qualified Voter File (QVF) or in the supplemental sheets.” Exh. 3, GLJC Complaintat 3. The GLJC Complaint provides additional witness affidavits detailing the fraudulent conduct of election workers, in particular, that of Zachary Larsen, who served as a Michigan Assistant Attorney General from 2012 through 2020 and was a certified poll challenger at the TCF Center. “Mr.
Larsen reviewed the running list of scanned in ballots in the computer system, where it appeared that the voter had already been counted as having voted. An official operating the computer then appeared to assign this ballot to a different voter as he observed a completely different name that was added to the list of voters at the bottom of a running tab of processed ballots on the right side
of the screen.” Id. at ¶ 16. Mr. Larsen observed this “practice of assigning names and numbers” to non-eligible voters who did not appear in either the poll book or the supplement poll book. Id. at ¶ 17. Moreover, this appeared to be the case for the majority of the voters whose ballots he personally observed being scanned. Id.”

https://citizenwells.com/2020/11/27/michigan-ag-dana-nessel-complicit-in-election-fraud-and-coverup-sidney-powell-lawsuit-numerous-witnesses-confirm-threatened-journalist-detroitleaks-video-authentic/

From The Hill.

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel (D) warned on Monday that a false claim of criminal activity, including election fraud, is itself a crime.

Through a tweet, Nessel responded to former state Sen. Patrick Colbeck’s (R) comments during a Michigan Board of State Canvassers meeting that ended with the state’s election results being certified.

Colbeck faced questions during the meeting about whether he had brought his allegations of voter fraud to the state attorney general.

Nessel confirmed in her Twitter thread that Colbeck “has never made a complaint of election fraud” to the Michigan attorney general’s office.

“If he had, we would have fully investigated said claim,” she said. ”

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/527265-michigan-ag-warns-on-election-fraud-claims-a-false-claim-of-criminal

Why would anyone take Nessel at her word?

Nessel is an avid anti-Trumper, routinely offering deranged comparisons of the President to Nazis and Adolf Hitler:

Jordyn Hermani

@JordynHermani

·

Aug 29

AG Dana Nessel kicking off her Democratic Nominating Convention by comparing President Trump to Adolf Hitler, before joking: “Hitler, by all accounts, could read and write … and he also was brave enough to serve in his nation’s military.”

https://summit.news/2020/11/13/michigan-ag-trumps-voter-fraud-lawsuits-are-racist/

From constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley November 23, 2020.

“Democratic leaders like Michigan’s Attorney General  Dana Nessel have threatened criminal prosecution against those who have posted videos alleging voting fraud and even threatened possible prosecution of legislators who meet with President Trump or raise challenges to the election results.  The media is virtually silent on these threats to coerce lawyers and legislators into silence. That is not viewed as a threat to the rule of law.  The threats against lawyers follows a pattern where Democratic members are calling for blacklists and others denounce any questioning of the Biden victory as akin to “Holocaust denial.” I spoke last week to Republican lawyers who described death threats, doxxing, and continual harassment for their representation in these lawsuits. The message is that if you represent the wrong side you will be denounced, doxxed, and disbarred.”

https://jonathanturley.org/2020/11/23/democratic-member-files-bar-actions-against-two-dozen-lawyers-challenging-election-results/

Clearly Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel  must be removed from office and prosecuted.

She is part of the problem and not solution.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Georgia & Pennsylvania absentee ballot fraud exposed in lawsuits & hearings, Illegal ballots revealed, Tens of thousands found, Watermark authenticity?

Georgia & Pennsylvania absentee ballot fraud exposed in lawsuits & hearings, Illegal ballots revealed, Tens of thousands found, Watermark authenticity?

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden.
Many batches went 100% for Biden. I also observed that the
watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of
transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit.”…Sidney Powell Georgia lawsuit

 

Pennsylvania.

From the PA Senate Majority Policy Committee.

Public Hearing on Election Issues

November 25, 2020.

Rudy Giuliani: “You sent out in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 1,823,148 absentee or mail-in ballots. You received back 1.4 million approximately. However, in the count for president, you counted 2.5 million. I don’t know what accounts for the 700,000 difference between the ballots you sent out and the number of ballots that ended up in the count,”

Are the excess ballots fake and if so will the watermark be used to authenticate?

Georgia.

From the Sidney Powell lawsuit filed November 25, 2020.

“A large number of ballots were identical and likely fraudulent. An
Affiant explains that she observed a batch of utterly pristine ballots:

14. Most of the ballots had already been handled; they had been
written on by people, and the edges were worn. They showed obvious
use. However, one batch stood out. It was pristine. There was a
difference in the texture of the paper – it was if they were intended
for absentee use but had not been used for that purposes. There was
a difference in the feel.

15. These different ballots included a slight depressed pre-fold so
they could be easily folded and unfolded for use in the scanning
machines. There were no markings on the ballots to show where they
had com~ from, or where they had been processed. These stood out.

16. In my 20 years of experience of handling ballots, I observed that
the markings for the candidates on these ballots were unusually
uniform, perhaps even with a ballot-marking device. By my estimate
in observing these ballots, approximately 98% constituted votes for
Joe Biden. I only observed two of these ballots as votes for President
Donald J. Trump.” (See Exh. 15 Attached hereto).”

“Another Affiant testified about the use of different paper for ballots,
that would constitute fraud stating:

I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden.
Many batches went 100% for Biden. I also observed that the
watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of
transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit. I
challenged this and the Elections Director said it was a legitimate
ballot and was due to the use of different printers. Many ballots had
markings for Biden only, and no markings on the rest of the ballot.”

Are some of these ballots fake and if so will the watermark be used to authenticate?

https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

Amistad Project Trump Georgia lawsuit John Wood v Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger et al Nov 25, 2020, Over 204k illegal votes & outside money

Amistad Project Trump Georgia lawsuit John Wood v Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger et al Nov 25, 2020, Over 204k illegal votes & outside money

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“F-E-L-O-N-Y. — Lin Wood Drops Late-Night Bombshell: “Would someone ask my never-to-be friend Brad Raffensperger @GaSecofState if he has seen this tape of election fraud at State Farm Arena in Fulton Co., GA?”…Attorney Lin Wood

 

From the Amistad Project Trump Georgia lawsuit.

John Wood v Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger et al

Filed November 25, 2020.

“The Contestant John Wood, as an aggrieved elector, brings this lawsuit against
the Defendants because state and local election administration officials have ignored statutes, interposed their own solutions for ballot security, accepted private money that casts doubt on election integrity and so mismanaged
the election process that no one can have faith that one of their most sacred rights under the United States and Georgia Constitutions, voting,
is being protected. Within the State of Georgia, private non—
profits, state officials and local elected officials acted to systematically eviscerate Georgia’s Election Law contrary to Title 21 of the Official Code of Georgia—failing to protect election integrity. Investigations have uncovered more than $350 million distributed nationwide —$6.3 million of which went to Fulton County, Georgia—and funneled through collection of non—profit organizations dictating to election officials how to manage the election.

In particular, the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) granted $6.3 million USD to Fulton County, Georgia. These unregulated private funds were predominantly used to:

(1) pay “ballot harvesters”;
(2) provide mobile ballot pick up units;
(3) deputize and pay political activists to manage ballots;
(4) pay election judges and poll workers;
(5) establish drop—boxes and satellite offices;
(6) pay local election officials and agents to recruit cities recognized as democratic strongholds to recruit other cities to apply for grants
from non—profits;
(7) consolidate counting centers in the urban core to facilitate the movement of hundreds of thousands of questionable ballots in secrecy without
legally required bi-partisan observation;
(8) initiate and implement two—tier ballot “curing” plan that illegally
counted ballots in Democrat strongholds and spoil similarly
situated ballots in Republican strongholds; and
(9) pay for and help design the plan to remove the poll watchers from one political party so that the critical responsibility of determining
the validity of the ballot and the validity of the count could be conducted without oversight.”

Read more:

https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/2020CV342959-PETITION.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Sidney Powell Michigan lawsuit Timothy King et al v Gretchen Whitmer et al Nov 25, 2020, “systemic adaptation of old-fashioned “ballotstuffing.” “

Sidney Powell Michigan lawsuit Timothy King et al v Gretchen Whitmer et al Nov 25, 2020, “systemic adaptation of old-fashioned “ballotstuffing.” ”

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“The comments made accusations of racism and threatened me and members of my family,”   “The Wayne County election had serious process flaws which deserve investigation. I continue to ask for information to assure Wayne County voters that these elections were conducted fairly and accurately. Despite repeated requests I have not received the requisite information and believe an additional 10 days of canvas by the State Board of canvassers will help provide the information necessary.”...Monica Palmer affidavit

 

From the Sidney Powell Michigan lawsuit.

1. This civil action brings to light a massive election fraud, multiple violations of the Michigan Election Code, see, e.g., MCL §§ 168.730-738, in addition to the Election and Electors Clauses and Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution violations that occurred during the 2020 General Election throughout the State of Michigan,1as set forth in the affidavits of dozens
of eye witnesses and the statistical anomalies and mathematical impossibilities detailed in the affidavits of expert witnesses.

2. The scheme and artifice to defraud was for the purpose of illegally and
fraudulently manipulating the vote count to manufacture an election of Joe Biden as President of the United States. The fraud was executed by many means,2 but the most fundamentally troubling, insidious, and egregious ploy was the systemic adaptation of old-fashioned “ballotstuffing.” It has now been amplified and rendered virtually invisible by computer software
created and run by domestic and foreign actors for that very purpose. This Complaint details an especially egregious range of conduct in Wayne County and the City of Detroit, though this conduct occurred throughout the State at the direction of Michigan state election officials.

3. The multifaceted schemes and artifices implemented by Defendants and their
collaborators to defraud resulted in the unlawful counting, or manufacturing, of hundreds of thousands of illegal, ineligible, duplicate or purely fictitious ballots in the State of Michigan, that constitute a multiple of Biden’s purported lead in the State. While this Complaint, and the eyewitness and expert testimony incorporated herein, identify with specificity sufficient ballots
required to overturn and reverse the election results, the entire process is so riddled with fraud, illegality, and statistical impossibility that this Court, and Michigan’s voters, courts, and legislators, cannot rely on, or certify, any numbers resulting from this election.

Dominion Voting Systems Fraud and Manipulation

4. The fraud begins with the election software and hardware from Dominion Voting Systems Corporation (“Dominion”) used by the Michigan Board of State Canvassers. The Dominion systems derive from the software designed by Smartmatic Corporation, which became Sequoia in the United States.”

Read more:

https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Michigan-Complaint.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

Sidney Powell Georgia lawsuit Pearson et al v Brian Kemp et al, Nov 25, 2020, 96600 absentee requested counted but never recorded as returned

Sidney Powell Georgia lawsuit Pearson et al v Brian Kemp et al, Nov 25, 2020, 96600 absentee requested counted but never recorded as returned

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“F-E-L-O-N-Y. — Lin Wood Drops Late-Night Bombshell: “Would someone ask my never-to-be friend Brad Raffensperger @GaSecofState if he has seen this tape of election fraud at State Farm Arena in Fulton Co., GA?”…Attorney Lin Wood

 

From the Sidney Powell lawsuit filed November 25, 2020.

“Defendants Kemp and Raffensperger rushed through the purchase of
Dominion voting machines and software in 2019 for the 2020 Presidential
Election4. A certificate from the Secretary of State was awarded to Dominion Voting Systems but is undated. (See attached hereto Exh. 5, copy
Certification for Dominion Voting Systems from Secretary of State).
Similarly a test report is signed by Michael Walker as Project Manager but is
also undated. (See Exh. 6, Test Report for Dominion Voting Systems,
Democracy Suite 5-4-A)

Defendants Kemp and Raffensperger disregarded all the concerns that
caused Dominion software to be rejected by the Texas Board of Elections in
2018, namely that it was vulnerable to undetected and non-auditable
manipulation. An industry expert, Dr. Andrew Appel, Princeton Professor of
Computer Science and Election Security Expert has recently observed, with
reference to Dominion Voting machines: “I figured out how to make a slightly
different computer program that just before the polls were closed, it switches
some votes around from one candidate to another. I wrote that computer
program into a memory chip and now to hack a voting machine you just need
7 minutes alone with it and a screwdriver.” (Attached hereto Exh. 7, Study,
Ballot-Marking Devices (BMDs) Cannot Assure the Will of the Voters by
Andrew W. Appel Princeton University, Richard A. DeMillo, Georgia Tech
Philip B. Stark, for the Univ. of California, Berkeley, December 27, 2019).5

As explained and demonstrated in the accompanying redacted
declaration of a former electronic intelligence analyst under 305th Military
Intelligence with experience gathering SAM missile system electronic
intelligence, the Dominion software was accessed by agents acting on behalf
of China and Iran in order to monitor and manipulate elections, including the
most recent US general election in 2020. This Declaration further includes a
copy of the patent records for Dominion Systems in which Eric Coomer is
listed as the first of the inventors of Dominion Voting Systems. (See
Attached hereto as Exh. 8, copy of redacted witness affidavit, 17 pages,
November 23, 2020).

Expert Navid Keshavarez-Nia explains that US intelligence services
had developed tools to infiltrate foreign voting systems including Dominion.
He states that Dominion’s software is vulnerable to data manipulation by
unauthorized means and permitted election data to be altered in all
battleground states. He concludes that hundreds of thousands of votes that
were cast for President Trump in the 2020 general election were transferred
to former Vice-President Biden. (Exh. 26).

Additionally, incontrovertible evidence Board of Elections records
demonstrates that at least 96,600 absentee ballots were requested and
counted but were never recorded as being returned to county election boards
by the voter. Thus, at a minimum, 96,600 votes must be disregarded. (See
Attached hereto, Exh. 9, R. Ramsland Aff.).

The Dominion system used in Georgia erodes and undermines the
reconciliation of the number of voters and the number of ballots cast, such
that these figures are permitted to be unreconciled, opening the door to ballot
stuffing and fraud. The collapse of reconciliation was seen in Georgia’s
primary and runoff elections this year, and in the November election, where
it was discovered during the hand audit that 3,300 votes were found on
memory sticks that were not uploaded on election night, plus in Floyd county,
another 2,600 absentee ballots had not been scanned. These “found votes”
reduced Biden’s lead over Donald Trump6.”

“Georgia’s election officials and poll workers exacerbated and helped,
whether knowingly or unknowingly, the Dominion system carry out massive
voter manipulation by refusing to observe statutory safeguards for absentee
ballots. Election officials failed to verify signatures and check security
envelopes. They barred challengers from observing the count, which also
facilitated the fraud.”

Read more:

https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

Eric Coomer Dominion executive explains how votes can be changed, 2016 Dominion Voting Systems Chicago demonstration, “Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”

Eric Coomer Dominion executive explains how votes can be changed, 2016 Dominion Voting Systems Chicago demonstration, “Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“It’s Massive, Criminal Voter Fraud! – It’s Going to Blow the Mind of Everyone In This Country!”...Attorney Sidney Powell on Dominion Voting Systems 

 

From The Post & Email September 1, 2016.

“On Friday, August 26^th, during a meeting at the Illinois State Board of Elections, the Vice President of Engineering for Dominion Voting, Dr. Eric Coomer*, was asked if it was possible to bypass election systems software and go directly to the data tables that manage systems running elections in Illinois. His response was, “Yes, if they have access.”

Bypassing the election systems software means whoever has access can potentially manipulate the vote without many risks of detection. So the question needs to be asked, who has access to these data tables?

We asked Dr. Coomer that question. Dr. Coomer replied, ‘Vendors, election officials, and others who need to be granted access.’

This is explosive information. Dr. Coomer’s statement is an admission that various vendors, election officials, and others have access to the back end data tables that permit bypassing the operating system’s configuration. It is notable that when someone accesses these systems from a data table, their actions are not logged by the system; thereby making detection much more problematic. This contradicts Dr. Coomer’s assurances that the system is secure.”

Read more:

https://www.thepostemail.com/2016/09/01/critical-flaws-in-election-security-confirmed-by-dominion-voting-executive/

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

Arizona lawsuit update Nov 12, Donald Trump v Katie Hobbs AZ Secretary of State, Unlawful procedures, Judge refuses to seal names of witnesses

Arizona lawsuit update Nov 12, Donald Trump v Katie Hobbs AZ Secretary of State, Unlawful procedures, Judge refuses to seal names of witnesses

“Poll workers struggled to operate the new voting machines in Maricopa County, and improperly pressed and told voters to press a green button to override significant errors,”  “The result is that the voting machines disregarded votes cast by voters in person on Election Day in Maricopa County.”…Matt Morgan, Trump 2020 campaign’s general counsel

“Attorney Sidney Powell 42k ballots in Arizona with only Joe Biden selected on ballots”…Maria Bartiroma show

“Arizona’s voter participation rate is 78.6%. Wisconsin’s is over 89%. Somebody is lying.”…Citizen Wells

 

From Donald Trump v Katie Hobbs AZ Secretary of State.

 

1. “Qualified electors casting ballots in person on Election Day in Maricopa County submitted their completed ballot to an electronic tabulation machine. Numerous voters were alerted by these devices to a facial irregularity in their ballot—frequently an ostensible ‘overvote’ — but were induced by poll workers to override the tabulator’s rejection of the ballot in the good faith belief that their vote would be duly registered and tabulated. In actuality, overriding the electronic tabulator’s alert automatically disqualifies the putative ‘overvotes’ without additional review or adjudication.​”

2. Arizona law requires that putative overvotes be subjected to further review in
an effort to discern the actual intent of the voter. While this safeguard was afforded to putative overvotes cast on early ballots and on Election Day ballots that poll workers properly segregated in a separate repository, potentially thousands of voters across Maricopa County have been disenfranchised by systematic improper tabulator overrides.

3. Upon information and belief, the adjudication and tabulation of these ballots
will prove determinative of the outcome of the election for President of the United States in Arizona and/or other contested offices in Maricopa County.

4. Declaratory, injunctive and mandamus remedies are necessary to prevent
irreparable injury to the Plaintiffs, vindicate the clear directives of the Arizona Legislature, ensure the fair and equal treatment of all Maricopa County electors, and secure the integrity of the results of the November 3, 2020 general election.”

Read more:

https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-files/press_assets/verified-complaint-with-attachments.pdf

From NewsMax November 11, 2020.

“An Arizona state court judge refused to seal evidence, including video taken within a polling place and declaration of witnesses with their name and other identifying information, in a case brought by the Trump campaign and Arizona Republican Party claiming voter fraud.

Judge Daniel Kiley refused the request, Phoenix NBC network affiliate KPNX reported, apparently agreeing with attorneys for Maricopa County officials.

The Trump campaign and Arizona GOP filed the lawsuit on Saturday claiming that thousands of votes in Maricopa County were unlawfully disqualified or considered ”overvotes” — voided because they were marked for more than one candidate in the same race. They asked for the sealing of the evidence in a subsequent motion.”

Read more:

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/arizona-fraud-evidence-seal/2020/11/11/id/996632/

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/