Category Archives: whitehouse.com

Larry Sinclair vindicated, Robert Braddock Jr. Sinclair lie detector administrator indicted, Sinclair Obama 1999 sex encounter allegations, Parisi claims

Larry Sinclair vindicated, Robert Braddock Jr. Sinclair lie detector administrator indicted, Sinclair Obama 1999 sex encounter allegations, Parisi claims

“Why was Obama absent from the opening session of the IL Senate on November 4, 1999, the start date of Larry Sinclair’s visit to Chicago?”…Citizen Wells

“Why did Barack Obama attempt to bribe Jeremiah Wright with $ 150,000?”…Citizen Wells

“Why did Donald Young, Bill Gwatney, Christopher Kelly, Andrew Breitbart and others with information about Obama all die under mysterious circumstances?”…Citizen Wells

From WND June 5, 2012.

“ANOTHER BOOST FOR OBAMA’S ‘GAY’ ACCUSER

Democrat who conducted polygraph indicted for campaign fraud”

“Last week, Robert Braddock Jr. – the Democratic Party operative who taped the lie detector test administered to Sinclair in February 2008 – was indicted in an unrelated matter by federal authorities and charged with conspiring to conceal campaign donations.

Braddock’s polygraph concluded Sinclair was lying.

But Sinclair continues to insist the charges in his book against Obama are true and that he has been a victim of a White House-organized campaign to discredit him.

Amazon claims

As WND reported, U.S. District Court Judge Richard J. Leon dismissed a libel case against Sinclair for Sinclair’s claim that top Obama adviser David Axelrod paid $750,000 to rig the results of the polygraph test.

Leon ruled in his Feb. 28 opinion dismissing the case that the plaintiffs, Daniel Parisi and his Internet porn site Whitehouse.com Inc., failed to show Sinclair had published any knowingly false statements. The judge concluded Sinclair had taken appropriate steps to verify information before publishing it.

Parisi filed March 30 jointly with Sinclair a “Stipulation and Order of Voluntary Dismissal,” which effectively ended Parisi’s claims against Sinclair.

Parisi, however, decided to appeal Leon’s March 31 order dismissing the libel case against Amazon.com.

“The issue before this Court is narrow and straightforward: Must an online bookseller stop selling a book based on mere allegations that its content is defamatory?” the lawyers for Amazon.com wrote in a brief filed with the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia May 17. “The answer is no, particularly where, as here, a separate unchallenged ruling of the District Court determined the book was not defamatory.”

Noting that Leon’s opinion had established a standard of “actual malice” in the case, the Amazon.com lawyers argued that the case against the online bookseller could not be sustained because it could not be proved that Sinclair’s book was false or that Sinclair had written the book in reckless disregard of whether it was false or not – a definition of “actual malice” set in the famous 1964 Supreme Court case, New York Times Co. v. Sullivan.

“I believe Amazon attorneys prepared a very strong and correct brief,” Sinclair told WND. “And I agree with Amazon’s reference that the Parisi brief appears to be more for the purpose of further publishing vicious attacks against me personally than it is to challenge the legal findings of the District Court in their March 31, 2012, dismissal of Parisi claims as they relate to Appellee/Defendant Amazon.com Inc.”

The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has scheduled Parisi’s appeal against Amazon.com for oral argument on Sept. 20 at 9:30 a.m.

Sinclair told WND he plans to be present for the oral arguments.

Lie detector

Meanwhile, the campaign for U.S. House of Representatives conducted by Connecticut Speaker of the House Chris Donovan was rocked last week with the arrest of his campaign finance director, Robert Braddock Jr.

Braddock recorded the Sinclair lie detector test in his capacity as the director of business development for the website Whitehouse.com.

According to an affidavit FBI Special Agent William B. Aldenberg filed last week in federal court in Connecticut, Braddock arranged for Donovan’s campaign to accept “conduit contributions” from individuals, “the purpose of which was to conceal the fact that the individuals actually financing the payments had an interest in legislation which was expected to and did come before the Connecticut General Assembly during the 2012 legislative session.”

Specifically, Braddock solicited campaign contributions from “roll-your-own,” or RYO, smoke shop owners who sought to defeat a proposed Connecticut law that would have imposed on them a tobacco manufacturers’ designation requiring a substantial licensing fee and tax increase.

Aldenberg’s affidavit detailed a series of recorded calls and meetings with undercover FBI officers in which Braddock arranged at least two payments of $10,000 to Donovan’s campaign. The payments consisted of four $2,500 checks in one instance and three checks amounting to $10,000 in the second. The contributions were made in the names of “conduit contributors,” or payments made by one person in the name of another.

The scheme was designed to hide the fact that the RKO smoke shop owners were making the campaign contributions in exchange for Donovan’s agreement to kill the revenue measure.

The affidavit recommended Braddock be indicted for conspiring to unlawfully conceal campaign contributions in violation of federal statutes.

Braddock was fired by the Donovan campaign after his arrest.

According to Courant.com, Donovan temporarily relinquished some of his duties as speaker of the Connecticut House of Representatives in the wake of Braddock’s arrest but has not abandoned his congressional bid.

The tax measure effectively died May 9, when the Connecticut legislative session ended without either chamber calling for a vote.

In reporting the incident, the Connecticut Post described Braddock as “a hired gun from North Carolina who over a short career has raised millions for several campaigns” and “is known as a savvy, cool-under-pressure operative,” who once worked “for an adult entertainment website.”

The Connecticut Post further reported that Donovan’s campaign had been selected from a pool of prospective candidates recommended by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

Sinclair noted on his website that Braddock, since his indictment, has scrubbed from his social networking Web postings his prior links to Brook Colangelo, chief information officer at the executive office of President Obama and the CIO of the Democratic National Committee from 2007 to 2009.”

http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/another-boost-for-obamas-gay-accuser/

Computer readings revealed that Larry Sinclair passed the lie detector test.

Read more:

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/06/23/larry-sinclair-story-fact-versus-fiction-larry-sinclair-arrest-attempts-to-silence-sinclair-larry-sinclair-political-prisoner/

Obama executes prisoner of war enemy combatant criminal, John McCain criticizes waterboarding, Long term consequences

Obama executes prisoner of war enemy combatant criminal, John McCain criticizes waterboarding, Long term consequences

From John Hammer of the Rhinoceros Times, May 12, 2011, in print in NC.

“President Barack Hussein Obama has been out campaigning this week. The 2012 presidential election is well underway and the president has been out making campaign speeches and raising money, as he will be for the next 18 months.

Whenever a president gets out on the campaign trail there is criticism because people don’t think their president should be political. But that is how they got to be president, by being politicians. We are now in the stage of the political process where the campaign staff starts having more and more say about the president’s actions.

In light of that, consider the current situation that Obama finds himself in. His approval ratings continue to trend downward. The approval ratings are the difference between those who “strongly approve” and “strongly disapprove” of the president’s actions.

There are bumps, but right now it appears the longer he remains in office the less he is liked by the American people. In January of 2009 his approval ratings were as high as plus 30; by March of 2011 his approval ratings had fallen to a low of minus 22. In April Obama’s approval ratings hovered between minus 15 and minus 20. It makes sense for a candidate to try to do something to get those ratings up.

Two things have happened recently that should have improved his poor approval ratings and have had some effect, but it appears that it is temporary.

First was the release of his birth certificate. There is no doubt that this was an event completely orchestrated by his staff. Obama could have released his birth certificate at any point in the past three years. He could have produced it, like Sen. John McCain did early in the campaign in 2008. Instead, Obama spent as much as $2 million in legal fees to keep from releasing it. But then came a constant barrage of demands to release it from a celebrity who can wave his hand and be surrounded by a sea of cameras – Donald Trump.

The Donald, as seems to have already been forgotten, was leading the polls as the Republican presidential opponent and was beating Obama every day with the birth certificate stick. So it made political sense for Obama to take the stick away from Trump and force Trump to find something else to beat him with. As a political move it made a lot of sense, but it didn’t provide Obama with a sustainable improvement in his approval numbers.

If you look at it as a campaign move, going after Osama bin Laden also makes sense. The reports say that they knew where Bin Laden was hiding out since August 2010. The raid took time to plan, but it didn’t take nine months. They had certainly established that Bin Laden wasn’t going anywhere and, no doubt, for a pacifist like Obama, it was not easy to order a raid where the goal was to assassinate a terrorist.

It sounds harsh to imply that the death of Bin Laden was orchestrated in an attempt to get Obama’s approval ratings up, but it makes sense from a political point of view. And in the coming months the political point of view is going to become not just the dominant point of view in the White House but very nearly the only point of view. The main job that Obama has for the next 18 months is to get reelected. If he doesn’t, not only is he out of a job but all the people who work for him are out of jobs as well, and his wife loses her Air Force jet.

The military and intelligence community had no doubt been pushing for the attack, with the hold up being the president.

Looking at it from a political standpoint also explains some things like the staged photo of Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, Vice President Joe Biden and others on the national security team watching television in the White House situation room. According to the director of the Central Intelligence Agency, Leon Panetta, they could have been watching a lot of different things, but they weren’t watching live footage of the raid on the Bin Laden compound because it wasn’t available. It’s a great photo and would have remained great if Panetta hadn’t spilled the beans.

The most interesting question about that photo, aside from what they were really watching on the screen, concerns that woman who is trying to squeeze in between a couple of men in the back. It turns out she is the director for counterterrorism, Audrey Tomason. She happens to be the only woman in the room other than Clinton, and appears to be the youngest person in the room as well.”

Read more:

http://greensboro.rhinotimes.com/Articles-c-2011-05-11-208317.112113-Under-the-Hammer.html

John McCain, who was held prisoner and tortured by the Viet Cong, has referred to waterboarding as torture and stated that it played no part in finding Osama Bin Laden.

From the LA Times  May 12, 2011.

“Former Atty. Gen. Michael Mukasey is taking issue with Sen. John McCain’s characterization of his account of whether information from detainees who were subjected to harsh techniques helped lead to Osama bin Laden.

“Sen. McCain described as ‘false’ my statement that Khalid Shaikh Mohammed broke under harsh interrogation that included waterboarding and disclosed a torrent of information that included the nickname of Osama bin Laden’s courier” — Abu Ahmed al-Kuwaiti — Mukasey said in a statement. “He strongly implied … that this harsh interrogation was not only useless but also illegal. He is simply incorrect on all three counts.”

Mukasey added: “KSM disclosed the nickname — Al-Kuwaiti — along with a wealth of other information, some of which was used to stop terror plots then in progress. He did so after refusing to answer questions and, when asked if further plots were afoot, that his interrogators would eventually find out. Another detainee, captured in Iraq, disclosed that al-Kuwaiti was a trusted operative of KSM’s successor, Abu Faraj al-Libbi. When Al-Libbi went so far as to deny even knowing the man, his importance became obvious.

“Both former CIA Director Michael Hayden and former Director of National Intelligence Adm. Michael McConnell have acknowledged repeatedly that up to 2006, many of the valuable leads pursued by the intelligence community came from the three prisoners who were subjected to harsh techniques that included waterboarding in order to secure their cooperation.”

Read more:
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-mukasey-osama-bin-laden-torture-20110512,0,6988211.story?track=rss

John McCain, knows what real torture is and yet believes waterboarding is torture. Does McCain believe that executing a prisoner is legal?

War criminals responsible for the deaths of millions in World War II were captured and tried. Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma City bomber was captured and tried.

I believe, as John Hammer has stated, that the execution of Bin Laden was done for political expediency.

I have concerns that the excution of an unarmed captured prisoner will set a dangerous precedent. What will stop our enemies from executing our captured soldiers? Yes, I know that it has already happened. But now they can point to our actions as justification.

Perhaps Bin Laden, already suffering from health issues, set us up for this.

Larry Sinclair lawsuit, Dan Parisi, WhiteHouse.com, Law firm retainer, Sinclair request

Larry Sinclair lawsuit, Dan Parisi, WhiteHouse.com, Law firm retainer, Sinclair request

Larry Sinclair has requested that I post the following comment today, June 23, 2010.
“Larry Sinclair for Congress 2010 I have found a seasoned Law office which specializes in Defamation/slander cases. I need to raise $5000.00 to retain their services. Can we get 100 people who want the truth known to contribute $50.00 each towards the $5000.00 retainer needed to secure the services of this law firm? Each one can be made through http://www.paypal.com and sent to email address: minnman0926@aol.com. If you click the personal tab and make sure “gift” is marked paypal will not deduct any fees from the contribution. Lets show Dan Parisi and DC’s most powerful Law Firm that we will fight for the truth.”

Larry called at 10:25 AM ET and asked that I add the following:

“I am putting up the title to my home and to my car to secure the retainer.”

Read more:

http://larrysinclair.com/index.html

Larry Sinclair press release, Daniel Parisi complaint, Whitehouse.com, Complaint and Jury Demand, Sinclair Publishing

Larry Sinclair press release, Daniel Parisi complaint, Whitehouse.com, Complaint and Jury Demand

From Larry Sinclair June 8, 2010.

“FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
June 8, 2010
Lawrence W. Sinclair
Sinclair Publishing, Inc
866-966-6599
 
RE: Daniel Parisi, Whitehouse.com Inc., Whitehouse Network LLC, & Whitehouse Communications Inc.,
 
                -VS-
 
Lawrence W. Sinclair a/k/a “Larry Sinclair”, Jeffrey Rense, Barnes & Noble Inc., Barnesandnoble.com LLC, Amazon.com Inc., Books-A-Million Inc., and Sinclair Publishing Inc.
 
 
On June 7, 2010 at 7:55 PM Lawrence W. Sinclair was served with “Summons in a Civil Action” and “Complaint and Jury Demand” Case Number 1:10-cv-00897 filed on May 28, 2010 in The United States District Court for the District of Columbia by Patton Boggs, counsel for Daniel Parisi.
 
Lawrence W. Sinclair and Sinclair Publishing, Inc will vigorously defend against this frivolous law suit brought by Daniel Parisi, infamous Internet Pornographer and stand firmly on the truth.  “Truth” is an absolute defense against libel and slander.  It is the position of Lawrence W. Sinclair and Sinclair Publishing, Inc. that the statements in the book Barack Obama & Larry Sinclair: Cocaine, Sex, Lies & Murder? Published June 2009 is truthful and factual.
 
Lawrence W. Sinclair and Sinclair Publishing, Inc are confident we will prevail and in doing so will expose Daniel Parisi, members of the Obama administration and Barack Obama himself for the frauds they are.”

Larry Sinclair has requested that this information be forwarded to as many press and media outlets as possible.

Larry Sinclair book, Citizen Wells review, Status update, August 6, 2009, Barack Obama & Larry Sinclair, Cocaine, Sex, Lies & Murder?, Donald Young murder

I have spoken to Larry Sinclair several times over the past several days. His new book, “Barack Obama & Larry Sinclair, Cocaine, Sex, Lies & Murder?” is doing well. The book is available at Barnes & Noble, Amazon, Books a Million and other book stores nationwide and internationally. I have had the book review ready for several days, but thought it fitting to make it the first article on my .com. The review is up at

http://citizenwells.com

The Obama camp is still at it, broadcasting lies, creating diversions and still trying to discredit Larry Sinclair and his book. Notice that Obama has never filed a lawsuit against Larry Sinclair. The reasons are obvious. The evil, Orwellian weasels of the Obama camp are going online, en mass, to create lower ratings for Larry’s book as well as file false book reviews.

Larry is requesting that anyone that buys his book  go online and rate it. It is the least we can do. Larry has risked his life and spent what little money he had to keep this important story alive. We owe this to Larry and especially the American public, to know the truth about the real Barack Obama.

Very few people know this, but Larry Sinclair has never been in this for the money. I know this for a fact. I covered this story in detail, had hundreds of conversations with him, controlled his blog when he was illegally arrested and watched from a front row seat as thousands tried to stop him. What very few people really know is that I tried on numerous occassions to convince Larry to make money off of his enormous web traffic. His answer was always the same:

“I am not doing this for the money.”

Larry Sinclair news conference, arrest, NPC, Sylvia Smith, Jane Hamsher, petition, MSM, Sinclair political prisoner, Freedom of Speech, DC Warrant, The Press is failing us

When they tried to silence Larry Sinclair, they tried to silence all
of us.

First came the personal attacks, attempts at discrediting Larry Sinclair and those following his story.

Next came attacks on Sinclair’s family.

Next came multiple death threats made on Sinclair.

Next came a petition encouraged by Jane Hamsher, an Obama supporter,
with ties to David Axelrod and the Obama Campaign, to block
Larry Sinclair’s news conference.

Next came Larry Sinclair’s arrest after his news conference at
the National Press Club. A DC warrant was fabricated for the arrest.

Next came more lies, smears and discreditation attempts by Jane
Hamsher and others aligned with the Obama Campaign.

From the beginning, the press, the MSM, has failed to do their job.
There is enough information, facts, about Obama, to cause any
intelligent, inquisitive news organization to dig beneath the
surface and discern the truth about the Larry Sinclair Story.

Why has the MSM not researched and covered the Larry Sinclair story:

Obama is untouchable. He is the candidate of change.

Fear of being tagged as racist.

Too much emphasis on producing entertainment shows, not news.

Agenda. Many so called news organizations have a far left agenda.
CNN and MSNBC are prime examples of this.

The National Press Club, obviously has many members that are in the
news media. The NPC agreed to allow Larry Sinclair to rent a room
for a news conference. Once the news conference was announced,
a furor (notice the resemblance to fuhrer) developed. Many Obama
supporters on the far left were enraged and questioned the NPC
decision to allow Sinclair to speak. Aren’t these some of the same
people outraged by the detention of prisoners at Guantanimo?

The National Press Club, and Sylvia Smith stood their ground
and supported free speech. However, there are several aspects
of the NPC experience that are troubling:

According to Larry Sinclair, the steps and routes that were set
up to supposedly maximize security, seemed to facilitate his arrest.

I have it on authority that a member of a major news organization
was not allowed in.

I am told from a reliable source that the arrest was supposed
to occur before the news conference and that Mr. Sibley thwarted
that attempt.

My best sources tell me that Sylvia Smith was seen talking on the
phone as Larry Sinclair was being escorted by law enforcement.
This is what I believe she said:
“they are bringing  him down now”.

The petition to stop the Sinclair news conference was accepted by
the General Manager, Bill McCarren. Why did the NPC accept the
petition?

Why did the General Manager of the NPC make this statement?

“Hopefully this man will be exposed for what he really is,”

View the video of the petitions being delivered here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sg0CpUQf-VE

The above video is from Jane Hamsher’s website, firedoglake.com.

Here are some quotes from Sylvia Smith:
“After a week of relentless e-mails and phone calls from people who were outraged at the prospect of a guy scheduling a press conference to make allegations about Barack Obama, I’m not sure extreme CPR could resuscitate the idea of free speech in some Americans’ minds.”
“My point is that the very thing the people who advocated blocking Sinclair’s press conference said they feared – widespread media coverage – simply didn’t happen because no credible news outlet would publish those kinds of allegations without first verifying them.”

Read more here:
http://www.journalgazette.net/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080622/EDIT0501/806220372

 
Here are some remarks from Larry Sinclair:

“THE NPC WITHOUT A DOUBT HAD MADE ARRANGEMENTS WITH DC METRO POLICE TO TAKE ME INTO CUSTODY AFTER THE PC. THEY WERE EVEN PARKED IN OUR (MINE AND THE NPC’S) PLANNED EXIT ROUTE FROM THE BUILDING AFTER THE PC WAS OVER. IT IS CLEAR THE NPC HAD ARRANGED FOR THE PC TO TAKE PLACE AND I WAS EVEN ESCORTED TO THE RESTROOM AND BACK TO AN ENCLOSED ROOM PENDING THE START OF THE PC.”

Read more about Larry Sinclair here:

http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com

The MSM is not doing their job

The MSM is protecting Obama

David Axelrod and the Obama Campaign are part of a reign of terror.

National Press Club, Sylvia Smith. What is your response to this
mutilation of justice?

 

 

Larry Sinclair news conference, Larry Sinclair arrest, DC Police, Delaware warrant, Political Prisoner, FBI, death threats, DC Judge, What Really Happened

The events leading up to, during and after Larry Sinclair’s news conference seem Orwellian or scripted from Nazi Germany or the Soviet Gulags. You have heard the lies, smears and hypocrisy. You have heard the lies about taking credit for Sinclair’s arrest and about the Colorado warrant. Now for the truth, from Larry Sinclair. I can corroborate much of what Sinclair says. Sinclair is free and here is the experience in his own words:

 “What Really Happened At The National Press Club
Posted by Larry Sinclair on Tuesday, June 24, 2008

First allow me to explain that on Monday, June 16, 2008 I was contacted by Special Agent Brenda Born of the DC FBI informing me that the FBI had identified and located the individual who threatened to kill me, my lawyer and my mother at the NPC.  Agent Born confirmed the individual was a resident of the DC area and was an adult.  What was shocking to me is that Agent Born informed me that the US Attorney in DC had decided not to file charges against this individual and that the identity of the person could not b provided to me or my attorney without the approval of the US Attorney.

As for my arrest at the NPC on Wednesday June 18, 2008 after the conclusion of the PC, I see that no one has bothered to print the truth so allow me.  First, the PC was in fact packed with PRESS contrary to the bloggers who want others to believe otherwise.  Shortly before 1:00 PM a line had formed causing the NPC to ask us to begin sign in because the lobby was filling up.

At the conclusion of the PC, NPC Security head had brought three (3) plain clothed DC Police Detectives into the room and introduced them to me.  All three identified themselves as DC Police detectives and that they had a “Fugitive from Justice” warrant from Delaware.  These detectives did not escort me out in hand cuffs as reported by others.  All three were very professional, polite and respectful.  When asked for a copy of the warrant, they stated they had it in the car.

On Thursday June 19, 2008 I appeared before Judge Melendez in the DC Superior Court.  I asked that the court release me and allow me to immediately report to Delaware authorities which the US Attorney and the Judge refused to do.  Further, even though the Judge and the US Attorney was informed of my being denied access to my medication and medical treatment, the US Attorney demanded a bail of $75,000.00 which was completely inappropriate considering that Delaware did not have a “Fugitive from Justice” warrant against me, and the Judge and US Attorney both KNEW this was in fact the case.

I was ordered held for Delaware which I waived extradition, and I was held in the DC Jail [from 6-19-08 until approximately 10:30am Monday June 23, 2008] and deny access to phone, medication, and medical treatment.  When picked up on Monday June 23, 2008 by Delaware officials, I asked why there would be a “Fugitive from Justice” warrant for my arrest.  I was informed that there was no such warrant issued by Delaware, but that in fact DC had made that charge against me in order for them to arrest me on the “Rule 9″ warrant that was pending from a Delaware “SEALED” Grand Jury warrant.  I was told that what DC should have done was advise me to report to Delaware.  This rule 9 warrant was explained to me as being nothing that anyone could call me a “Fugitive from Justice” on because I had never been served the notice, taken into custody or formally charged on as yet.

Upon my return to Delaware, I appeared before a Superior Court Judge at 2:30 pm at which time I was released on PR bond and released.  I will say that the charge is questionable at best and after speaking with my Attorney I will allow him/her decide what can and cannot be posted here.

So to all those reporting I was taken out in hand cuffs, I assure you I walked out with no cuffs, carrying my bags from the NPC.  I also feel it important to state that the NPC staff conducted themselves with nothing short of kindness and professionalism from the moment I arrive to the moment I left.

Yes there are some questions for the US Attorney’s Office in the FBI investigation of the death threats, the arrest on the Delaware matter and the denying of phone access, medication and medical treatment while being held in custody in DC.  Just as there are some questions as to Judge Melendez’ refusal to allow me to report to Delaware and her holding me over on a DC produced warrant that did not reflect the Delaware issue appropriately, and her failure to order my being provided my prescribed medications and phone access even to my attorney.  There are some questions for the US Marshall’s Office and the way I was treated when I repeatedly requested access to my medication and/or medical treatment.”

Read more here:

http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/what-really-happened-at-the-national-press-club/#comment-53055

Larry Sinclair is free, Why was Sinclair arrested, Another failed attempt to smear Sinclair, Parties responsible should be held accountable

Larry Sinclair was transported to Delaware and appeared before a
judge. Sinclair was allowed to return home.

Why was Sinclair arrested?

I have it on authority that they tried to arrest Sinclair before
the news conference began.

Did the DC police fabricate a warrant in order to arrest Sinclair?
First Axelrod and the Obama Campaign attack and try to discredit
Sinclair.

Next multiple death threats were made.

Then Jane Hamsher, on her website, encouraged Obama supporters
to sign a petition to try to prevent Sinclair from speaking at
his news conference.

Then Sinclair is arrested before he can answer more questions.

Is this the kind of change you want? This is the kind of change
the German people got with the Adolf Hitler and the Nazis.

I intend to get to the bottom of this chicanery.

Larry Sinclair Story, Fact Versus Fiction, Larry Sinclair Arrest, Attempts to Silence Sinclair, Larry Sinclair Political Prisoner, Joe Biden, Attorney General, Delaware

I posted the following on Larry Sinclair’s blog this morning:

1. Story – Larry Sinclair alleges a drug and gay sex encounter with Barack Obama in November 1999. Larry Sinclair has provided records. Obama has supplied none.

2. Larry Sinclair contacted the Obama Campaign and David Axelrod in 2007. After multiple attempts, Sinclair got no response.

3. In January 2008, Larry Sinclair presented a YouTube video to tell
his story. The personal attacks began attempting to discredit Sinclair.

4. In February 2008, Internet pornographer Dan Parisi, who runs the website WhiteHouse.com, made a polygraph challenge to Sinclair.

Polygraph tests are inherently unreliable.

Larry Sinclair volunteered to take the polygraph test.

The computer readings showed that Larry Sinclair passed the test.

Edward I. Gelb, who has a phony PHD, claimed that Sinclair failed the
test.

Dan Parisi, in violation of the contract with Sinclair, set up a
news conference at the NPC, on June 18, 2008.

Dan Parisi canceled his news conference for alleged technical problems.

My reliable source indicates Parisi canceled his news conference
after notification of Sinclair’s arrest.

5. In February 2008, Larry Sinclair set up a blog to tell his story and to answer questions. The personal attacks escalated and led to multiple
death threats. * Note * The saying “follow the money” applies.
Larry Sinclair does not make money off of his blog. Many of the blogs attacking Sinclair (Let’s use the Obama word, smearing) make money off of their blogs. The Citizen Wells blog does not make money either.

6. Larry Sinclair announced a News Conference at the National Press
Club for June 18, 2008. The attacks escalated more. Jane Hamsher,
who I am told from reliable sources has ties to Axelrod, promoted
a petition on her website to block Larry from speaking at the NPC.
Jane Hamsher, by the way, makes money off of her website.

7. Larry Sinclair was arrested at the end of the news conference.
Here are some interesting facts associated with the arrest:

Larry Sinclair addressed the outstanding warrants in CO and FL
several months ago.

I have information from two reliable sources that Sinclair’s
record was thoroughly checked in January 2008 and there were no
other outstanding warrants.

The arrest warrant was from Delaware, not Colorado.

Internet sites known for lies and smears reported they were
responsible for the arrest and that the warrant was from Colorado.

Sylvia Smith of the NPC was seen talking on the phone as Sinclair
was escorted out of the building. I am not accusing Sylvia Smith,
the President of the NPC, of anything. However, it does smell a little.
This is what I believe she said:
“they are bringing  him down now”.

The arrest warrant is from Delaware. The Attorney General of
Delaware is Joe Biden’s son. Joe Biden has been mentioned as a
front runner for Vice President.

Questions:

What has happened to Larry Sinclair’s right of Habeas Corpus?

Why has Obama not provided records after repeated efforts by
people such as Tim Russert?

Why did a warrant suddenly appear from Delaware?

Why are so many trying to silence and discredit Larry Sinclair?