Tag Archives: gay sex

Larry Sinclair story, Obama drugs, Gay sex, November 1999, Down low, Larry Sinclair interview, Midnight Marauder Show, Sinclair tells story, Obama drug encounter

Larry Sinclair was interviewed on August 20, 2008, by the Midnight Marauder Podcast Show. Sinclair told his story from start to finish, the same story he has consistently told of his drug and gay sex encounter with Barack Obama in November 1999. Whether you are aware of this encounter or not, this interview is compelling and worth listening to. The first part of the show spoofs the recent bigfoot fake story but uses the press coverage of the bigfoot story to highlight the priorities of the MSM. Here is the interview of Larry Sinclair:

http://eipnetworks.com/2008/08/20/midnight-marauder-show-8-21-08/

Read more from Larry Sinclair here:

http://larrysinclairbarackobama.com

http://larrysinclair0926.com

Voice your concerns about Barack Obama here:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Larry Sinclair news conference, press release, Sinclair names limo driver, limousine driver, Obama cocaine use, gay sex, Paramjit Multani, Five Star Limousine, Dan Parisi, Obama cell phone, Sinclair answers questions, polygraph lies, whitehouse.com, Reverend Manning

Larry Sinclair held a news conference at the National Press Club today, Wednesday, June 18, 2008. Sinclair divulged the limo drivers name, Paramjit  Multani. Multani was driving the Five Star Limousine that Sinclair rented. Sinclair also provided a document that reveals that a  Rashpal Multani was an agent for the corporation operating the limo service in 1999. Reverend Manning, I am told, was in attendance.

Here is the Larry Sinclair news conference press release:

PRESS STATEMENT OF LARRY SINCLAIR

JUNE 18, 2008

 

 

 

Good afternoon, my name is Larry Sinclair and I am a former recreational drug user and trafficker, a convicted felon for crimes of forgery, bad checks and theft by check. I am also an American who loves this country and I cannot stay silent regarding Barack Obama knowing what I know.

Today I will discharge my obligation as a citizen to witness this knowledge to you and raise questions for others to investigate and consider. I am going to briefly describe my background, my experience with Senator Obama in 1999, what appears to me to be a coordinated effort to discredit me and finally a list of questions. After this brief statement, I will take and try to answer any reasonable questions.

Background
 
I am 46 years old and I currently reside in Duluth, MN. I am a US Citizen, and I have made mistakes in my lifetime. I have been convicted and served prison sentences for writing bad checks, forging checks, using stolen credit card numbers in Arizona, Florida and Colorado. These event’s occurred over twenty (20) years ago between 1980 thru 1986. After going public on the internet with these claims against Senator Obama earlier this year, I became aware of a warrant out of Florida from 1986 which I have resolved and it has now been dismissed. I also have an active “Colorado Only” warrant for alleged “Theft and Forgery”. I am not ignoring this warrant but am addressing it with the Court in Colorado as well as with the DA’s office. I have a pending motion to dismiss this warrant which I am waiting to have calendared by the Colorado Court.

I have lived and worked under three different names. My birth name is Lawrence W. Sinclair. Later on, I had my name legally changed first to La-Rye A. Silvas, and then La-Rye Vizcarra Avila. The last two were legal name changes granted by the court in Penal County Superior Court, Florence Arizona. I legally returned to my birth name in the Fremont County District court, Canon City, Colorado in 1997.

Obama Incident
 
 

 

I flew out of Colorado Springs, Colorado to Chicago on November 2, 1999, arriving in O’Hare early in the morning of November 3, 1999. I went to the Chicago area to attend the graduation of my god son (my best friend’s son) from basic training from the Great Lakes Navy Training Center. I made reservations at the Comfort Inn and Suites in Gurnee, IL based on location to the Navy Training center. On November 5, 1999, I hired the services of Five Star Limo. I had hired them for both November 5 and November 6. On November 6, 1999, I asked the limo driver – whose name I now reveal for the first time – Paramjit Multani, if he knew anyone who would like to socialize and show me Chicago. Paramjit Multani understood that I was not looking for someone who knew Chicago and would enjoy socializing. Paramjit Multani said he knew someone who was a friend of his.

On November 6, 1999 after picking me up at the Hotel in Gurnee– and this is significant – Paramjit Multani used his cellphone to make a call. That call was made to then-Illinois State Senator Barack Obama to set up an introduction between me and Senator Obama. Upon arriving at the bar and exiting the Limo, Senator Obama was standing next to Paramjit Multani and I was introduced to Senator Obama. Later that evening at a bar which I believe was called Alibis, I mention I could use a line or two to wake up. Senator Obama asked me if I was referring to “coke” and after stating I was, Obama stated he could purchase cocaine for me and then made a telephone call – and this too is significant — from his cellphone to a presently unknown individual during which Senator Obama arranged the cocaine purchase.

Senator Obama and I then departed the bar in my limousine and proceeded to an unknown location where Senator Obama exited the limousine with two hundred fifty dollars ($250) I had given him and returned a short while later with an “eightball” of cocaine which he gave to me. I did ingest a couple of lines of cocaine, and shortly thereafter Senator Obama produced a glass cylinder pipe and packet of crack cocaine from his pants pocket and Obama smoked the crack cocaine. I performed fellatio on Senator Obama in the limousine during the time Senator Obama was smoking crack cocaine, after which I had the driver take me to the my hotel, The Comfort Suits, Gurnee, Illinois.

The following day, November 7, 1999, Senator Obama appeared at my hotel room where we again ingested cocaine and I again performed fellatio on Senator Obama. Significantly, both the driver’s telephone call to Senator Obama and his call to the drug dealer should appear on the driver’s and Senator Obama’s cellphone billing statements.

Fall 2007
 
 

 

In September 2007 I contacted the Presidential Campaign of Barack H. Obama, to request solely that Senator Obama publicly correct his stated drug use record to reflect his use of crack cocaine with me in November 1999. When I made that first contact I left with the Presidential Campaign of Senator Barack H. Obama a telephone number for the campaign to return my call. The first number I provided was a Texas cell phone number. From the period of Labor day weekend 2007 through November 18, 2007 I did rovide a total of four (4) different call back numbers to the Obama campaign, as I had moved and had changed the numbers to reflect locally my place of residence at the time. In late September to early October 2007, I received a call from a male who identified himself as a “Mr. Young” stating he was calling in regards to calls I had made to the Obama campaign. This first call was in fact an attempt by “Mr. Young” to obtained from me the identities of anyone I had contacted concerning my 1999 allegations against Senator Obama. This first called shocked me in that this “Mr. Young” asked me why I had not asked Senator Obama to disclose the sexual encounters I had with Mr. Obama in 1999. I was shocked as I had never mentioned to the campaign or anyone working for the campaign any sexual encounters as my call was prompted by drug allegations only. The call ended with “Mr. Young” stating I would hear from someone in a few days.

In mid to late October 2007, I received a second call from this “Mr. Young” at which time I clearly became aware that this individual was personally involved with Senator Obama rather than just an employee of his campaign. The tone of the conversation had a sexual nature. “Mr. Young” did not once advise me how he obtained my phone number which by this time had now changed to a Delaware number.

In late October 2007, I received a text message from the gentleman identified as “Mr. Young” in which he stated he was intimately involved with Senator Obama and that Obama was discussing with him and his pastor how to publicly acknowledge Senator Obama’s drug use in 1999 and that Obama wanted to be sure I had not discussed the sexual encounters or drug incidents with any media at that time.

In mid to late November 2007, in another text message from “Mr. Young” , he advised me that Senator Obama will publicly correct his statement as to he last time he used drugs and I did not need to concern myself with publicly disclosing it myself. The last contact I had with “Mr. Young” was in early December 2007 when he made it clear to me that Senator Obama had no intentions of publicly acknowledging his 1999 use of crack cocaine and that “Mr. Young” was in fact doing nothing more than milking information from me for Senator Obama’s use.

I later learned that a Donald Young was the choir director of Reverend Wright’s Trinity United Church of Christ – Obama’s now-former church — and was openly a homosexual. I also learned that he was murdered on December 23, 2007. I have cooperated with the Chicago Police Department in this matter by providing them the telephone numbers I was using during the fall of 2007 and I release them now publically in the hope that someone may be able to connect the dots between these telephone numbers and Mr. Young. Those numbers are: 954-758-1105; 956-758-1885; 956-758-8002; 302-685-7175; 612-466-1043.

2008
 
 

 

In what I now realize was a naive and un-counseled decision, I posted in January 2008 a video on YouTube.com where I related the above information regarding my liaisons with Senator Obama in 1999. The response was overwhelming and I quickly became the recipient of what in hindsight appears to have been a coordinated attack on my character with ever increasing falsehoods circulating on the internet.

In response I agreed to take a polygraph test from Whitehouse.com. The results of that test have been partially revealed to the end of labeling me a liar and taken as gospel by all. I would like to make the following comments about that polygraph test. First, I have been subsequently advised that Whitehouse.com was a website dedicated to anti-Clinton pornography until earlier this year. Second, I have now come to understand that lie detectors are junk science at best which is why courts of law refuse to use them. Third, a review of the results by George W. Maschke, Ph.D. of AntiPolygraph.org raises serious questions about the legitimacy of the examination. Indeed, overlooked by almost everyone is that hitehouse.com’s own examiner, Dr. Gordon Barland, observed that on the drug question regarding Senator Obama that the computerized score found that there was less than a 1% probability of deception by me. That’s about as high a passing score as one can possibly attain.

Finally, in February 2008 I was told anonymously that Dan Parisi of Whitehouse.com received $750,000 from the Obama campaign through AKR Media to organize an effort to publically discredit me. When I confronted Dan Parisi with this allegation, he did not deny it but instead withdrew the second exonerating polygraph report of Dr. Gordon Barland, failed to post the video of my polygraph as he and Whitehouse.com promised they would do, and even removed posts from their web site altogether, claiming that they had “had enough of the attacks by Sinclair’s supporters and Sinclair himself.”

The polygraph results – as misrepresented – were immediately seized upon by the blogger community and I became the subject of vicious lies about me. I was forced to file a lawsuit in an attempt to stop those lies about me that have been circulating. That lawsuit sought to obtain the proof of what I was saying about my contact with Senator Obama through subpoenas for the identities of the anonymous bloggers so they could be linked to the Obama campaign and relevant records of the cellphone companies to prove the truth of my allegations. To date, though the lawsuit is now over ninety days old, Judge Kennedy has refused to permit the suit to move forward so this evidence may be obtained.

Conclusion
 
 

 

In sum, you can discredit my story and then make your decision on who should be the next President of the United States. The burden is now off me as I have told my story without the distortions that have been intentionally heaped on me in what my lawyer tells me is an ad hominem attack – shoot the messenger so you don’t have to hear the message he is bringing. I am now done. It is for others to find the corroborating evidence of my story by locating the limousine driver – Paramjit Multani – and the telephone numbers related to Donald Young and/or Senator Obama. I leave you with these questions that I have asked of Senator Obama but which he – who wants to be the next President of the United States – has refused to answer:

1. Why won’t Senator Obama provide his cellphone numbers and telephone records for all his personal and official cell phones held by him for the time period of November 3, 1999 thru November 8, 1999, when we met?

2. Why won’t Senator Obama provide his cellphone numbers and telephone records for all his personal and official cell phones held by Senator Obama or September 2007 – December 23, 2008, the murder of Donald Young?

3. Why won’t Senator Obama provide all email communication both personal and campaign related to and/or from AKP Message & Media from January 18, 2008 through February 29, 2008 for Senator Obama, David Axelrod and David Plouffe?

4. Why won’t Senator Obama provide proof of all payments made from AKP Message & Media, Obama for America, David Axelrod, David Plouffe, and Senator Obama’s accounts for the period of January 18, 2008 through February 29, 2008?

On my website – larrysinclair.org – you will find the documents that I have referred to in this statement. A copy of the home page for that website is attached. Thank you for your time and attention this afternoon and I will now take any questions.

- E n d -

http://larrysinclair.org

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 18, 2008 Press Statement of Larry Sinclair

Supporting Documents

1.
 
 
 

 

Hotel receipt

2.

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

Barack Obama in Chicago early-November 1999.

3.

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

Five-Star Limo corporate information

4.

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

Larry’s Affidavit to Chicago Police

5.

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

Larry’s First Letter to Obama after the polygraph

6.

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

Larry’s Second Letter to Obama after the polygraph

The Polygraph Test of Larry

1.
 
 
 

 

Whitehouse.com former anti-Clinton, pornography site

2.

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

Whitehouse.com Polygraph Agreeement

– Whitehouse.com promises a copy of thevideo of Larry’s polygraph but never releases a copy to Larry or publically.

3.
 
 
 

 

 

Polygraph Results

4.

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

Polygraph Critique

5.

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

Polygraph examiner’s Edward Gelb’s fake credentials

The Coordinated Attack Against Larry

1.
 
 
 

 

Obama’s four hundred (400) hired bloggers

2.

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

Relationship between Bloggers and Obama campaign

3. Paid Obama Blogger –

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

Sam Graham-Felsen

– Anti-American?Lawsuit: Lawrence Sinclair vs.TubeSockTedD, mzmolly and OWNINGLIARSU.S. District Court Case No.: 1:08-cv-00434-HHK (District of Columbia)

1.
 
 
 

 

 

 

Judge Kennedy

2.

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

Complaint

3.

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

Motion for Hearing

on the curiously-timed suspension of Larry’s Attorney -Montgomery Blair Sibley

4.
 
 
 

 

 

Docket Sheet

Obama Background Information

1. Obama Fund-raising in 1999 in Chicago for
 
 
 

 

Deheisha Palestinian Camp

2.

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

Obama Worked with Terrorist

 

RESS STATEMENT OF LARRY SINCLAIR

 

 

Larry Sinclair, Press release, Obama drug use, November 1999, gay sex, National Press Club, Wednesday, June 18, 2008, NPC press release

Larry Sinclair will be presenting a news conference at the National Press Club, Wednesday, June 18, 2008. The location has been moved from the Lisagor room, which held 40 people to the Holeman Lounge, a larger venue. Mr. Sinclair and his attorney, Montgomery Sibley, have offered a press release. Here is the the Larry Sinclair on Obama press release:

  

 

 

Larry Sinclair press conference, National Press Club, confirmed, Obama allegations, Obama cocaine use, gay sex, NPC Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Larry Sinclair has confirmed reservations for a press conference at the National Press Club on Wednesday, June 18, 2008. The press conference will be from 2:30 PM to 5:00 PM in the Lisagor Room. 

I have been following the Larry Sinclair story for months and I have been in regular contact with Sinclair and a former Chicago restaurant owner/chef that heard persistent rumors from the gay community that Obama was on the down low. Sinclair’s story has gained in credibility each day as Obama’s credibility has plummeted.

Larry Sinclair has alleged that he and Obama used drugs on two occasions between November 3 and November 8, 1999. Sinclair has also alleged a gay sex encounter with Obama. Obama and Sinclair are both documented to be in Chicago during that time. Obama was absent from the Illinois Senate on November 4, 1999 and the senate did not reconvene until November 16, 1999. Obama was in Chicago at least by November 8, 1999 for a speaking engagement.

Larry Sinclair further alleges that Donald Young, the gay choir director at TUCC, Obama’s former church and the church of Jeremiah Wright, contacted him prior to Young’s murder. Sinclair has provided the Chicago Police with an affadavit.

Here is the announcement by Larry Sinclair:

National Press Club
529 14th St. NW, 13th Floor – Washington, DC 20045
202-662-7500

 

 
Wednesday, June 18, 2008

3:00 PM

Lisagor Room   

I am pleased to announce that the National Press Club has been confirmed for Wednesday, June 18, 2008 from 2:30 PM to 5:00 PM in the Lisagor Room.  I will be somewhat occupied for the rest of the day and part of tomorrow preparing the press release that will go out via a news-wire service as well as being distributed by the NPC .

To read more visit here:

http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/2008/06/10/national-press-club-confirmed-its-official/#comment-32806

Larry Sinclair, National Press Club, Washington DC, June 18, 2008, allegations, Obama, November 1999, Obama cocaine use, gay sex

Larry Sinclair has announced that he will appear at the National Press Club in Washington DC on June 18, 2008. Larry Sinclair has alleged that he and Obama used drugs and engaged in gay sex in November 1999.

I have been researching Obama and following the Larry Sinclair story. Just last week Sinclair was in Washington, where he visited the DNC, spoke to many Democrats, was interviewed several times and told his story to many in the press as well as Hillary supporters. Sinclair even met Greata Von Sustern. Sinclair’s story is not an isolated event and did not occur in a vacuum. The Reverend James Manning has alleged that Obama and Jeremiah Wright are closet homosexuals and that he has solid proof. I am in regular contact with a former Chicago restaurant owner/chef that heard persistent rumors that Obama was on the down low. Obama has many documented ties to crime and corruption in Chicago and Illinois, including Tony Rezko, who was convicted on 16 of 24 counts of corruption. Obama has multiple ties to drug users and male friends that are part of the down low scene. Don’t forget, Obama is an admitted cocaine user.

Donald Young, the gay choir director at TUCC, Obama’s former church, and the church of Jeremiah Wright, was murdered in December 2007. Larry Sinclair alleges that Young contacted him shortly before he was murdered. Sinclair has presented phone numbers from his Donald Young encounter and has provided this information to the Chicago Police in the form of a signed, notorized affadavit, a legal document.

Here are exerpts from Larry Sinclair’s blog:

“We will be going back to DC  for a formal press conf  on June 18, 2008 at the National Press Club.  The arrangements are being made with the National Press Club for that date. (THE NECESSARY PAPERWORK AND FEE’S WITH THE NPC ARE BEING TAKEN CARE OF AND ONCE ALL IS PROCESSED AND APPROVED WE WILL BE LISTED ON THE NPC SCHEDULE.)

Until tomorrow let me say that I sincerely appreciate all of your support and that I AM NOT BACKING DOWN NOR MAKING ANY DEALS WITH THE OBAMA CAMP OR THE DNC.

The truth will prevail, and the DNC heads and many of the Democratic members of the House and Senate will have to decide if they are truly willing to risk their seats this November on forcing a fraud and a liar on the American Voter.”

Read more here:

http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/2008/06/07/the-fight-goes-on/#comment-30217

Larry Sinclair press conference, Friday, May 30, 2008, Washington DC, Attorney Sibley, Obama cocaine, gay sex

Larry Sinclair is in Washington DC to call the bluff of the many that are trying to discredit him. Sinclair and his attorney, Montgomery Sibley will be available for a press conference, Friday, May 30, 2008. The organized efforts to discredit Larry are so desperate that they are making threatening posts that appear to be from Sinclair. This further lends credence to Sinclair’s allegations. Here is an exerpt from Larry Sinclair’s blog:

“May 30, 2008 I will be available to Media along with my Attorney Montgomery Blair Sibley in Washington, DC.  This press conference will be Friday afternoon and the location is being sent to media by Mr. Sibley.

Now, I am being threatened yet again with arrest by the Obama supporters.  It appears the Obama supporters are claiming I have threatened someone in a comment on their blog.  Well allow me to make it perfectly clear, I have not commented on any blog other than my own and the posting of an article accusing me of threatening Mr. Levy has been saved and is being sent to Law Enforcement and the Court to show what these people are willing to say and post to try and stop me from appearing before the PC and the DNC Meeting Saturday.  It is not going to work. “

To read more about this visit:

http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/2008/05/29/friday-5-30-08-press-conference-obama-supporters-make-threatening-comments-and-falsely-attributes-them-to-me/

Larry Sinclair, Obama, cocaine, gay sex, November 1999, Chicago, Washington DC, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, MSM wake up, Sinclair’s story

I have been following and reporting on the Larry Sinclair allegations of drug use and gay sex with Obama in November 1999. My initial skepticism led to my indepth investigation of not just Sinclair’s allegations but also Obama’s past actions and associations. The more I examined Obama, the more credible Larry Sinclair’s allegations have become.

So, you are still a skeptic? Well, Sinclair is in Washington DC for interviews, to find out why the DNC has ignored him and some associated with the DNC have attacked him, and to visit the FBI in regard to death threats he has received. Sinclair is persistent and sincere in his crusade to reveal the truth about Obama.

When I first began evaluating Sinclair’s claims, I went to the Official Illinois Senate records for November 1999. Sinclair was in Chicago from November 3 to November 8, 1999. Obama was absent from the Senate on November 4, 1999. The Senate did not reconvene until November 16, 1999. It turns out that Obama was at least in Chicago by November 8, 1999. Obama was at Northwestern Law School for a speech on November 8. That puts Obama and Sinclair in Chicago at the same time.

Still not convinced? Several months ago I discovered that a former Chicago restaurant owner and chef heard persistent rumors from the gay community that Obama was on the down low. I am in regular contact with this person, who happens to be very intelligent and articulate.

Still not convinced? Reverend James Manning  stated in a video and 2 interviews that Obama and Jeremiah Wright are closet homosexuals. He claims to have solid proof. Reverend Manning has stated that his further announcement and proof will be forthcoming soon.

Larry Sinclair has contacted many major players in the MSM and has offered to answer any questions. Sinclair will be interviewed tonight by Jeff Rense and there is reason to believe he will be interviewed by a network soon.

Many in the public have only made a cursory examination of the claim by Sinclair and have dismissed the allegations after reading the many attempts at discrediting him. There has been a mass effort to discredit Larry Sinclair. If you are in the MSM, you had better wake up.

Obama, cocaine, Larry Sinclair, November 1999, gay sex, Obama down low?, more evidence

I reported many weeks ago, after reading the allegations by Larry Sinclair that he and Obama used drugs and engaged in gay sex in November 1999, that Obama was absent from the Illinois Senate on November 4, 1999. We have proof that Larry Sinclair was in Chicago from November 3 to November 8, 1999. We now know that Obama was in Chicago on November 8, 1999. We also know that the Illinois Senate was not in session again until November 16, 1999.

Obama was in Chicago at least by November 8, 1999 to speak at Public Interest Law Week at Northwestern University School of Law. Obama was a speaker at the 12:00 Noon Keynote Address on Monday, November 8, 1999.

So now we know that both Larry Sinclair and Obama were in Chicago at the same time.

We have allegations from a former chef in Chicago of persistent rumors from the gay community in Chicago that Obama was on the down low.

We also have allegations from Reverend Manning that Obama and Jeremiah Wright are closet homosexuals. Reverend Manning states that he has solid proof.

Here is a link to the Public Interest Law Week at Northwestern University School of Law:

http://www.law.northwestern.edu/news/Fall99/PubIntLWeek/Schedule2.htm

Here is a link to Larry Sinclair’s blog:

http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/

Here is a link to an interview of Reverend Manning:

http://rense.gsradio.net:8080/rense/special/rense_Pastor_J_Manning_051208.mp3

Do you still believe Larry Sinclair’s allegations are far fetched? Remember. We know that Obama has used cocaine before.

Larry Sinclair Obama allegations, timeline, drugs, gay sex, November 3 1999, November 4 1999, November 8 1999

Larry Sinclair has alleged he had drug and gay sex encounters with Barack Obama in Chicago between November 3 and November 8 1999. Victor posted this comment on my blog today with the timeline and events of the alleged encounter as he has read and understands it. This is not directly from Larry Sinclair’s mouth but I know that Victor has been following the story closely:

“When Larry Sinclair arrive d in Chicago on 3rd November 1999 he intended to stay until 6th.
He then extended his stay to 8th.

Confirmation of his arrival, departure and request for an extension has been provided by the legal department of Choice International the company that owned the Comfort Inn, Gurney, Illinois where he stayed. The documents have been posted on LS blog.

He met Barack Obama on 6th in a lounge in downtown Chicago and went with him for a drive in the limousine Larry Sinclair had hired for the duration of his stay.

The limousine dropped off LS at his hotel on the night of 6th before taking BO back to wherever his car was parked.

BO returned to the hotel uninvited and unexpected on 7th.

If my memory serves, BO was missing from the senate for personal business on 4th and also on another day about that time.

On 6th he had his own glass pipe which he used to smoke crack. I understand crack is very addictive. Speculatively, if he were in a drug-taking mode at that time it could have begun on 4th and continued for several days. And there may have been a hangover effect after his last meeting with LS on 7th.”

If you would like more information on this story click here:

http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com

Obama, Larry Sinclair, limousine, P Multani, cocaine, gay sex, illegal aliens

To read the limo driver story questions and answers between
Citizen Wells and Larry Sinclair, click here:

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/07/21/limo-driver-multani-larry-sinclair-five-star-limousine-service-chicago-drugs-sex-obama-down-low-citizen-wells-blog-sinclair-news-conference/

 

 

Larry Sinclair has made allegations that he had multiple encounters with Barack Obama from November 3 through November 8 1999. One of the encounters was alleged to be in a limousine from 5 Star Limousine Service in Chicago. Sinclair states that the limousine driver’s name is P Multani. Sinclair has also stated that in the past he has helped illegal aliens. There was a Paramjit Singh Multani, from India, in this country illegally and he was in Chicago around the time of the alleged limousine encounter. Is Larry Sinclair using information he had about an illegal alien and Barack Obama’s schedule to fabricate this story or is this story real.

Below is a petition involving a P Multani. Is this the man Larry Sinclair is referring to and did he drive a limousine?

United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Argued January 25, 2006

Decided July 28, 2006

Before

Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

No. 05-1732

PARAMJIT SINGH MULTANI,

Petitioner,

v.

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney

General of the United States,

Respondent.

Petition for Review of an order of

the Board of Immigration Appeals

No. A29 396 661

O R D E R

This petition for review requires us to untangle a snarl of procedural steps that

the petitioner, Paramjit Singh Multani, has created for us and the immigration

authorities. Multani would like his removal proceedings stayed or administratively

closed while his wife appeals from the revocation of the approval of her I-130 petition,

which entitled Multani to a visa based on his marriage to a U.S. citizen. Relying on

Multani’s record of “flouting” the immigration laws in various ways, the IJ denied this

request; indeed, he went further and ordered that Multani be deported to India.

Multani petitioned for review. We conclude that we have jurisdiction over this petition.

Notwithstanding the fact that the Board of Immigration Appeals has, since argument

in this case, vacated the revocation of the I-130 petition and remanded for further

UNPUBLISHED ORDER

Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53

No. 05-1732 Page 2

proceedings on the bona fides of the marriage, we see nothing in the decision of the IJ

or the BIA before us that would justify granting the petition for review. Multani must

therefore seek whatever further relief may be available to him from the BIA or the

appropriate agency within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

I

Multani, a citizen of India, first entered the United States illegally in 1987. He

was arrested by immigration officials in Florida in 1991, at which time the former

Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) issued an Order to Show Cause (OSC)

charging him with deportability for illegally entering the United States. Multani failed

to appear at his hearing and was ordered deported in absentia. In 1996, he turned up

in California, where he applied for asylum. In that application (in which Multani used

a shortened version of his name, Paramjit Singh), he claimed that he was tortured and

beaten in India in 1993, and that he first entered the United States in 1994. He made

no mention of his prior immigration proceedings. The application was denied and

Multani received another OSC, based on illegal entry. Once again, Multani failed to

attend his deportation hearing, and once again, he was ordered deported in absentia.

Then in 1998, Multani was again found in the United States and charged with

deportability for entering the country illegally. This time, a warrant for his deportation

was issued, but in February 1999 he sent a letter to the INS, notifying it that he had

“self-deported” to Canada and that the INS was “not to bother” him at his new address.

Apparently Canada was not to his liking, because he illegally reentered the

United States eight months later. The INS caught up with him quickly and charged

him with removability for the illegal reentry. Multani denied that he was removable

and requested an opportunity to apply for adjustment of status. His case was

transferred to Chicago, and in October 2000, the IJ ordered him deported to India.

Multani then filed a motion to reopen his case, arguing that he was denied an

opportunity to apply to have his status adjusted to that of a lawful permanent resident,

based on an approved I-130 petition filed by his wife, who was a U.S. citizen. Multani

concurrently applied to adjust his status, but his application falsely claimed that he

had never previously been deported. At the same time, Multani appealed the IJ’s

October 2000 decision to the BIA, which remanded his case so that the IJ could

consider his application for adjustment of status.

At the hearing on Multani’s application to adjust his status, the IJ informed him

that because of his “self-deportation” in 1999, he was ineligible to adjust status and

become a permanent resident. Multani’s attorney, however, then informed the IJ that

four days earlier, he had filed an I-212 application on Multani’s behalf, requesting

permission for Multani to reapply for admission to the United States after deportation.

The IJ decided to continue the hearing. Before it resumed, the United States

Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) (a bureau of DHS) revoked the I-130 visa

petition that Multani’s wife had filed. When the status adjustment hearing resumed,

No. 05-1732 Page 3

Multani requested that the IJ continue his case, pending resolution of an appeal of the

visa revocation. As we noted above, on April 7, 2006, the BIA ruled favorably on

Multani’s appeal, ordering “the District Director to provide the petitioner an additional

opportunity to submit evidence in support of the bona fides of the marriage.” The BIA’s

order does not comment on any other aspect of the case, although it includes a footnote

detailing the various names that DHS asserts Multani has used. Interestingly, the

BIA’s order of April 7 identifies him as “Paramjit Singh,” not as Multani. We think it

is fair to conclude, from counsel’s submission of the Board’s April 7 order, that he

concedes that he has used both names.

Back in 2003, however, the IJ refused Multani’s request to continue the case or

to adjust his status; instead, he issued an order dated June 18, 2004, that concluded

with the following language: “IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s request for acontinuance be denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the respondent be deported from

the United States to India on the charge contained in the Notice to Appear.” The IJ

explained in the order that Multani’s record was “replete with misrepresentations,

deceptions, and utter disregard for the laws of the United States.” The IJ recognized

that he had discretion whether to grant Multani’s request for a continuance, but that

given Multani’s history, this relief was not warranted, nor was any further delay in

resolving the case as a whole.

Multani appealed to the BIA, arguing that the IJ had violated his due process

rights by not acting impartially, and that the IJ abused his discretion by denying a

continuance knowing that Multani’s visa had been “revoked in violation of the law.”

Unmoved, the BIA affirmed the IJ’s decision. Foreshadowing its later ruling in the visa

appeal, it expressed concern about the revocation of Multani’s marriage visa, noting

that the only apparent basis for that action was that Multani was “the kind of person

who would enter into a sham marriage.” This, it concluded, would be an improper

reason for such an action. Nevertheless, the BIA found that Multani did not merit

discretionary relief, because he “flout[ed] immigration laws” by making

misrepresentations in his application, failing to appear for prior hearings, and twice

ignoring deportation orders. The BIA’s order concludes with the statement

“[a]ccordingly, the appeal is dismissed.”

II

The government argues that this court lacks jurisdiction to consider Multani’s

challenge to the IJ’s denial of his request for a continuance pending his appeal of the

revocation of the marriage visa. It argues further that we lack jurisdiction to review

the IJ’s decision to deny Multani’s application for adjustment of status. It is true that

the governing statute, 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii), which is entitled “denials of

discretionary relief” says that “[n]otwithstanding any other provision of law … and

except as provided in subparagraph (D), … no court shall have jurisdiction to review…

(ii) any other decision or action of the Attorney General or the Secretary of Homeland

No. 05-1732 Page 4

Security the authority for which is specified under this subchapter to be in the

discretion of the Attorney General or the Secretary of Homeland Security….” See

Subhan v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 591, 595 (7th Cir. 2004) (stating in dicta that ordinary

denials of continuances are covered by the statutory ban on judicial review); Yerkovich

v. Ashcroft, 381 F.3d 990, 995 (10th Cir. 2004); but see Zafar v. U.S. Attorney General,

426 F.3d 1330, 1334-35 (11th Cir. 2005) (holding that the authority for an IJ to grant

a continuance is derived solely from regulations promulgated by the INS, and thus the

ban on judicial review does not extend to rulings on motions for continuances). In some

situations, however, the denial of a continuance is functionally the final substantive

order in the case. See Subhan, 383 F.3d at 595-96; see also Benslimane v. Gonzales,

430 F.3d 828, 832 (7th Cir. 2005). In those situations, we have held that substance

should prevail over form, and that we have the power to review the ultimate decision

in the case.

In its zeal to protect the Attorney General’s discretion, however, the government

has overlooked the fact that, in the final analysis, this is not a petition for review of the

denial of a continuance. It is a petition from the final order commanding that Multani

be deported to India. As is often the case, Multani is complaining that various

procedural steps along the way to that outcome require reversal. But that does not

mean that this court lacks jurisdiction to review the deportation order, as we normally

do under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a). See Hamdan v. Gonzales, 425 F.3d 1051, 1057 (7th Cir.

2005) (noting that scope of appellate review now includes review of constitutional

claims and questions of law). Our jurisdiction over this petition is secure, even though

there may be particular rulings that receive special deference.

Unfortunately for Multani, however, this procedural victory is of little avail. His

protestations about his inability to gather together all of his prior records ring hollow,

especially since he has now conceded the fact that “Paramjit Singh Multani” (whose

case was docketed as A29 396 661 by DHS) and “Paramjit Singh (whose case was

docketed as A75 019 376 by DHS) are one and the same person. The IJ did not abuse

his discretion when he found that Multani did not merit either a continuance or any

other kind of discretionary relief. We have no reason to second-guess the IJ’s finding

that Multani’s “record is replete with misrepresentations, deceptions, and utter

disregard for the laws of the United States.” Finally, we reject Multani’s claim that the

proceedings before the IJ infringed his due process rights. Among other problems with

this argument is the fact that an alien’s right to due process does not extend to

proceedings that provide only discretionary relief. See Cevilla v. Gonzales, 446 F.3d658, 662 (7th Cir. 2006); Hamdan, 425 F.3d at 1060-61. In addition, Multani has given

us no reason to think that the IJ and the BIA were anything but impartial and

conscientious.

The petition for review is DENIED.