Obama motion to dismiss Georgia ballot challenge denied, David Farrar et al vs Barack Obama, Judge Michael M. Malihi

Obama motion to dismiss Georgia ballot challenge denied, David Farrar et al vs Barack Obama, Judge Michael M. Malihi

“Why did Obama, prior to occupying the White House, employ Robert Bauer of Perkins Coie, to assist him in avoiding the presentation of a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells

“Why has Obama, since taking the White House, used Justice Department Attorneys, at taxpayer expense,  to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells


“Why is Obama now employing private attorneys to keep his name on state ballots, despite compelling evidence that he is not a natural born citizen?…Citizen Wells

The Obama motion to dismiss the Georgia ballot challenge has been denied.

First some background.

From Citizen Wells December 20, 2011.

“Obama has engaged private attorney Michael Jablonski to respond to the Pre Trial order filed by David Farrar. The order requests that Barack Obama’s name be removed from the Georgia State ballot because Obama is not a natural born citizen and therefore not qualified for the office of the president.”

“From David Farrar V Barack Obama.
“(4) The issues for determination by the Court are as follows:
A. Is the candidate’s proffered birth certificates, authentic state-issued documents that verify his actual, physical birth in Hawaii?
B. Is the candidate an Article II natural born citizen of the United States as established in US. Supreme Court case: Minor vs Happersett 1875 Page 88 U. S. 163
C. O.C.G.A. § 21-2-560 Making of False Statements Generally. Is the candidate’s Social Security number, authentic?”

“The GA Democratic Party may put anyone they want on the ballot. However, that right does not trump the US Constitution dictate that the president must be a natural born citizen. GA election law clearly provides the Secretary of State and electors the power to challenge the qualifications of candidates. Also, to my knowledge, no court in this country has ruled that Obama is a natural born citizen.

I was born and raised in NC, have some experience reading legal documents and we also have some good dictionaries in NC. I have read the motion from Mr. Jablonski as well as the 2008 and 2011 versions of Georgia election laws. I will leave it for the reader to evaluate the accuracy of the following statements by Michael Jablonski in the hope that good dictionaries and logical thought capabilities exist in other parts of the country.”

https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2011/12/20/david-farrar-v-barack-obama-georgia-ballot-obama-not-natural-born-citizen-obama-attorney-michael-jablonski-motion-ga-election-laws/

From Orly Taitz January 3, 2012.

Order to deny Obama motion:

“ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS

On December 15, 2011, Defendant, President Barack Obama, moved for dismissal of Plaintiffs’ challenge to his qualifications for office. The Court has jurisdiction to hear this contested case pursuant to Chapter 13 of Title 50, the “Georgia Administrative Procedure Act.”

For the reasons indicated below, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED.

I. Discussion
1.

The Georgia Election Code (the “Code”) mandates that “[e]very candidate for federal and state office who is certified by the state executive committee of a political party or who files a notice of candidacy shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.” O.C.G.A. § 21-2-5(a).

2.

Both the Secretary of State and the electors of Georgia are granted the authority under the Code to challenge the qualifications of a candidate. The challenge procedures are defined in Code Section 21-2-5(b), which authorizes any elector who is eligible to vote for a candidate to challenge the qualifications of the candidate by filing a written complaint with the Secretary of State within two weeks after the deadline for qualifying. O.C.G.A. § 21-2-5(b).

3.

The Georgia law governing presidential preference primaries mandates that “[o]n a date set by the Secretary of State . . . the state executive committee of each party which is to conduct a presidential preference primary shall submit to the Secretary of State a list of the names of the candidates of such party to appear on the presidential preference primary ballot.” O.C.G.A. § 21-
2-193. On October 6, 2011, Secretary Kemp issued a notice to the chairman of each political party to notify them that the deadline for submitting the list of candidate names for the 2012 presidential preference primary was November 15, 2011. On November 1, 2011, the Executive Committee of the Democratic Party submitted President Barack Obama’s name as the sole candidate for the Democratic Party. To be timely, complaints challenging a presidential
candidate’s qualifications in the presidential preference primary had to be filed no later than November 29, 2011. Plaintiffs, as electors eligible to vote for Defendant, timely filed challenges with the Secretary of State before the deadline of November 29, 2011.

4.

In the instant motion, Defendant contends that Georgia law does not give Plaintiffs authority to challenge a political party’s nominee for president in a presidential preference primary because Code Section 21-2-5 does not apply to the presidential preference primary.

5.

Statutory provisions must be read as they are written, and this Court finds that the cases cited by Defendant are not controlling. When the Court construes a constitutional or statutory provision, the “first step . . . is to examine the plain statutory language.” Morrison v. Claborn, 294 Ga. App. 508, 512 (2008). “Where the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous, judicial construction is not only unnecessary but forbidden. In the absence of words of limitation, words in a statute should be given their ordinary and everyday meaning.” Six Flags Over Ga. v. Kull, 276 Ga. 210, 211 (2003) (citations and quotation marks omitted). Because there is no other “natural and reasonable construction” of the statutory language, this Court is “not authorized either to read into or to read out that which would add to or change its meaning.”
Blum v. Schrader, 281 Ga. 238, 240 (2006) (quotation marks omitted).

6.

Code Section 21-2-5(a) states that “every candidate for federal and state office” must meet the qualifications for holding that particular office, and this Court has seen no case law limiting this provision, nor found any language that contains an exception for the office of president or stating that the provision does not apply to the presidential preference primary. O.C.G.A. 21-2-5(a) (emphasis added). Although the word “candidate” is not explicitly defined in the Code, Section 21-2-193 states that the political party for the presidential preference primary “shall submit to the Secretary of State a list of the names of the candidates of such party to appear on the presidential preference primary ballot.” O.C.G.A. 21-2-193 (emphasis added). Accordingly, this Court finds that Defendant is a candidate for federal office.

7.

Code Sections 21-2-190 to 21-2-200 set out the procedures of the presidential preference primary and also provide no exception to the Section 21-2-5 qualification requirement. This Court finds no basis under Georgia law why the qualification requirements in Section 21-2-5 would not apply to a candidate for the office of the president in the presidential preference primary.

8.

Accordingly, this Court finds that Defendant is a candidate for federal office who has been certified by the state executive committee of a political party, and therefore must, under Code Section 21-2-5, meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.

II. Decision

Based on the foregoing, the motion to dismiss is DENIED.
SO ORDERED, this the 3 rd day of January, 2012.
MICHAEL M. MALIHI, Judge”

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Farrar-Motion-to-dismiss-by-Obama-is-denied.pdf

Thanks to commenter Pat 1789.

About these ads

71 responses to “Obama motion to dismiss Georgia ballot challenge denied, David Farrar et al vs Barack Obama, Judge Michael M. Malihi

  1. What some people have to realize is the Rand and Ron Paul are also Republicans. It does absolutely nobody any good to spread false accusations against the two of them with the short sighted goal of dropping them down a peg in the primaries. The Ron Paul supporters are energized and are going to go somewhere, so why not communicate with them as equals (rather than something else) so we can find common ground to fight the enemies in the Democrat party? Some people here are willing to slander any group of people that may even have a minor disagreement with their own myopic viewpoint. See this video of Rand Paul and think before you talk!!!!http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/01/03/rand_paul_on_a_ron_paul_third-party_run_dont_think_its_a_good_idea.html

  2. A welcome and sensible ruling from this Judge. What happens next will be most interesting.

  3. For Bob Strauss……….OT……..but important.
    Bob for your convenience I have l taken the liberty to look up the procedures and offices in Canada that would be utilised in a legally asdministered name change. In BC as elsewhere in Canada a BIRTH CERTIFICATE is a REQUIRED entity for a legal name change for either a RESIDENT,or non resident of Canada. By the way this has been in effect for many decades. A legally executed name change does become PUBLIC INFO just as it does in the US. Also a Petition IS required in Canada as well. If he refused to show a valid BC he would NOT have been able to legally change his name in Canada. Now check out the alleged PLACE where it is supposed to have been changed…….and have your eyes opened.

  4. Bob Strauss………..
    By the way here is the telephone number of the vital statistics office in BC. 250-952-2681. Have a good day.

  5. Is this……. “when OBAMA’s snow ball starts rolling down hill”?….

    Thank God there is still ONE honest and God-fearing judge in Georgia! If this case proceeds to court…and we have every right to assume it is ….then OBUMMER and MUCHELLE are finished. Neither will be able to withstand a discovery process, or show ANY valid records.

    Once the state of Georgia takes the lead in denying this fraud, then all other states will have to do the same….

    I will be so happy to see EGG all over the faces of the propaganda press in trying to defend not properly vetting the fraud. Ms. Pelosi should be the first to crack and “fess up” to her trickery. Dirty Harry will be a close second to her. Both should be sentenced to 99 years of hard labor for their part in the usurpation of the office of POTUS.

    Mr. Obama, you better start packing your bags for a hasty departure from the US before you are shown the inside of a 5 foot cell.(don’t forget to take your wife too)

  6. GA Judge allowed consolidated plaintiffs to be severed and scheduled three cases for January 26. With the denial he rejected key defense arguments that GA rules do not apply to Federal candidates and that Obama is not a ‘candidate’ for election but merely applicant for a primary. He also rejected the idea that the 2008 election results mean voters qualified Obama. This decision appears to be one of very few to date honoring the Constitution.

  7. RMINNC………………
    I second your comment brother!……..100%

  8. RMINNC…………….
    Lets not waste the EGGS……..they are getting expensive. Lets hope that she gets a little of her own sort of freshly passed BS all over her. Perhaps she could be guided into standing close to Joe Biden, then it is almost a sure thing that she would get splattered by his ORAL MANURE.

  9. Statuatory language as it is written is the all important factor. But watch out the language can be altered at the drop of a hat. If you don’t think so just go back a couple of months to what happened to the reference decision records of the US Supreme court. Yep the WORDSMITHS were burning the MIDNIGHT OIL.

  10. GO get em Judge Malihi. I would venture to guess that there are at least 150,000,000 people watching, listening, and reading what is going on in GA. Hopefully it will send a strong message to ALL of the SOS, and electors……….that DEEP DOO DOO could suddenly engulf them all.

  11. BYE BYE for today!

  12. I concur Old Salt…….

    Lots of fresh bulls*it (enough to drown them in it) would be better for the likes of all involved in this massive fraud against the people of the United States.

  13. One simple question…..If the fraud didn’t release his so-called Birth Certificate until AFTER the election….HOW did stretch Pelosi know he was eligible???? According to Hawaii, ONLY the fraud could obtain a copy of his BC to put out for public viewing.

  14. Good question Honor First…….
    Perhaps Ms Pelosi can answer that for the American people from within her cell.

  15. jbjd:

    “MEMORANDUM of COMPLAINT of ELECTION FRAUD against THE HONORABLE NANCY PELOSI, ACTING in a NON-GOVERNMENTAL ROLE as CHAIR, 2008 DNC SERVICES CORPORATION (“DNC”) CONVENTION; and ALICE TRAVIS GERMOND, SECRETARY, DNC; and REQUEST for INVESTIGATION by GEORGIA ATTORNEY GENERAL”

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/21675349/jbjd

  16. Keeping my fingers crossed. At least, they have been ruled safe at first base. We’ll see if the Ump continues to stand up for the rule of law.

    Got to go.

    Zach

  17. NBC_Vic_Hern

    If I recall correctly, this is but ONE of THREE cases before the Georgia
    court(s).
    Our lawyers agreed to separate into these THREE, with each filing and
    litigating their own.
    So this is part of Orly’s original case, but separate.
    Am I right?

  18. citizenwells

    NBC.
    I believe you are correct.

  19. http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/house-hold-hearing-obama-visa-fraud/288791

    House investigators will hold a hearing this week on President Obama’s immigrant visa application policy following an inspector general report that immigration enforcement bureaucrats pressure officers to approve potentially fraudulent immigrant visa applications.

    “It’s outrageous that administration officials would compromise national security for their own political agenda and gain,” said House Judiciary Committee chairman Lamar Smith, R-Texas. “The Immigration Subcommittee plans to hold a hearing in February on visa fraud and will investigate these alleged abuses by the administration,” he added.

  20. More:

    http://www.thedaily.com/page/2012/01/03/010312-news-immigration-strife-1-3/

    Higher-ups within U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services are pressuring rank-and-file officers to rubber-stamp immigrants’ visa applications, sometimes against the officers’ will, according to a Homeland Security report and internal documents exclusively obtained by The Daily.

    A 40-page report, drafted by the Office of Inspector General in September but not publicly released, details the immense pressure immigration service officers are under to approve visa applications quickly, sometimes while overlooking concerns about fraud, eligibility or security.

    One-quarter of the 254 officers surveyed said they have been pressured to approve questionable cases, sometimes “against their will.”

  21. Once again….”please, please, please like us…for giving you everything and trusting you”:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jan/03/taliban-leaders-guantanamo-bay-deal

    And who is reassuring us….why the ivory tower elitists of course!

  22. Philo-Publius

    The GA Ballot Legal defense fund is asking for donations.

    This site has never, in its four year history, asked for donations until now.
    The battle to keep Obama off the Georgia ballot comes at a price.., the price of representation.
    I have shouldered this till now but these legal expenses will require your help. Please be a part of this history making challenge.
    http://www.riseupforamerica.com/

  23. “NH lawmakers question Obama ballot status”

    “CONCORD, N.H.—A small group of New Hampshire lawmakers and others want the attorney general to investigate whether President Barack Obama deserves to be on the presidential primary ballot.


    The U.S. Constitution requires that a presidential candidate be a natural-born U.S. citizen or born abroad to parents who are both U.S. citizens; at least 35 years old; and a resident of the United States for at least 14 years.

    The state Ballot Law Commission rejected an effort to take Obama’s name off the ballot because of questions about his citizenship.”

    http://www.boston.com/news/politics/articles/2012/01/03/nh_lawmakers_question_obama_ballot_status/

  24. Santorum’s Nephew Endorses Ron Paul, Writes Excellent Op-Ed

    If you want another big-government politician who supports the status quo to run our country, you should vote for my uncle, Rick Santorum. America is based on a strong belief in individual liberty. My uncle’s interventionist policies, both domestic and foreign, stem from his irrational fear of freedom not working.

    Read more: http://thedc.com/yYAEqL

  25. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    GORDO | January 3, 2012 at 6:51 pm |
    “NH lawmakers question Obama ballot status”
    _______________________________________________

    From the article -

    “Democratic Party Chairman Ray Buckley said it’s another example of how “crazy town” has taken over the Statehouse.”

    Which brought forth this response -

    CaMaven wrote:
    Somebody please tell Mr. Buckley that “crazy town” is breaking your own election laws and enabling an ineligible candidate to usurp the office of President. Since he and ALL of his colleagues have been informed of this and failed to act, they are likely guilty of misprision of felony. We suggest that you and your colleagues study this: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html and seriously contemplate engaging an excellent attorney.

    Also keep in mind that your candidate has either hidden or forged all of his vital documents that could exonerate him.

  26. citizenwells

    “John Garver is a 19-year-old student at the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown.”

    Being the nephew of Rick Santorum does not make him a political genius.
    Being a college student doesn’t help either.

  27. Is Rick Santorum a Natural Born Citizen per the SCOTUS in Minor V Happersett?
    http://www.wnd.com/2011/12/376953/

  28. Official: Michael Scheuer (CIA Bin Laden Unit Chief) Endorses Ron Paul 1/3/12 [NEWS COVERAGE

    Michael Scheuer, the CIA’s former agent charged with tracking Osama bin Laden, endorsed Ron Paul in a Sunday column he published on his website.

    In the piece, Scheuer said: “Electing anyone but Ron Paul will further increase the already strong chances of widespread Islamist-conducted violence inside the United States.”

    “Michael Scheuer understands that only Dr. Paul will put our national security first and stop the foreign wars and nation building,” said Jesse Benton, national campaign chairman. “Our campaign is very proud to have his support.”

    Scheuer spent 22 years as a CIA intelligence officer, and is now a blogger and political analyst who serves as an adjunct professor at Georgetown University’s Center for Peace and Security Studies.

    He served as chief of the Osama bin Laden tracking unit at the Counterterrorist Center from 1996 to 1999. He also worked as a special adviser to the chief of the bin Laden unit from September 2001 to November 2004.

    Des Moines Register:
    http://caucuses.desmoinesregister.com/2012/01/03/former-cia-

    CNN:
    http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/01/03/the-spy-who-loves-r

    US News:
    http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/ballot-2012/2012/01/03/form

    NewsMax:
    http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/MichaelScheuer-binLaden-e

    PRWeb:
    http://www.prweb.com/releases/2012/1/prweb9073084.htm

    Scheuer’s Full Endorsement Here: http://tiny.cc/ry1b0

  29. Chuck Norris Endorses Ron Paul!
    Turns out, Clarkson’s not the only (semi) famous Paulista out there. According to a tally by The Hill, Paul also counts actor Vince Vaughn among his supporters. And action star Chuck Norris – who famously endorsed Mike Huckabee in the 2008 cycle, making for one of the season’s best political ads – is supporting Paul this time around. Paul also appears to count singer Michelle Branch and rapper Prodigy among his backers.

    Coming in a close second, Rick Perry touts the support of Kiss frontman Gene Simmons, actor Dean Cain, and actor Stephen Baldwin. Perry is also friends with actor Russell Crowe (though Crowe apparently hasn’t officially endorsed him).

    As for the rest of the field … well, see for yourselves: Mitt Romney’s got former supermodel Cindy Crawford’s approval, along with singer Pat Boone, and the Osmonds. Michele Bachmann’s got singer Wayne Newton. Actor Gary Busey endorsed Newt Gingrich – but then rescinded his endorsement.

    http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Elections/From-the-Wires/2012/0

  30. citizenwells | January 3, 2012 at 7:20 pm |
    ========================
    Amen!

    If Paul gets in and we’re attacked (because that will probably be the only reason he might permit fisty cuffs) they’ll have to bring back the draft….since his conscientious objector type of approach is probably the main reason he has such a large following of the young.

  31. I’m awaiting moderation (8:13)!!

  32. How Rick Santorum Helped Pass ObamaCare

    Reports NewsMax:

    Rick Santorum’s endorsement of Arlen Specter… the key Senate vote to pass Obamacare, is becoming a key issue as the Iowa caucuses near…

    Santorum’s support of Specter was cited as a key help to the liberal Specter… Santorum’s support for Specter proved crucial in the primary, in which Specter defeated (Pat) Toomey with just 50.8 percent of the vote.

    Conservative criticism of Specter appeared justified. Specter backed Obama’s healthcare program — giving him the swing vote to pass the legislation in the Senate.

    In 2009, Specter faced likely defeat in the GOP primary, once again challenged by Toomey. Specter decided to leave the Republican Party and ran for re-election as a Democrat. Obama backed him strongly.

    Specter was defeated in the Democratic primary by Rep. Joe Sestak, who then lost the general election to Toomey.

  33. Liberal Rick Santorum

    That Rick Santorum is a lifelong big government Republican is no secret to anyone who has actually looked at his record. Reports CNN:

    Ron Paul dinged rival Rick Santorum Monday for being a “very liberal” candidate, saying the former Pennsylvania senator and staunch social conservative voted for too much spending during his time in Congress.

    Speaking to CNN Senior Congressional Correspondent Dana Bash before a campaign event with his son, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, the White House hopeful said his rival had taken positions counter to true conservative ideas.

    “I mean, have you looked at his record? Go look at his record,” Paul said.

    He continued: “He spends too much money. He wasn’t leading the charge to slash the budgets and vote against big government.”

    Rand Paul added that Santorum’s vote history proved he wasn’t a true conservative.

    “He voted to double the size of the Department of Education,” Rand Paul said. “He voted to expand Medicare and add free drugs for senior citizens and he has voted for foreign aid. Those are not conservative principles. Seventy-seven percent of the American people are opposed to foreign aid and Rick Santorum has voted for it every time it’s come down.”

  34. Ron Paul and George Soros Connected?

    (comment from Free Republic)
    Posted on January 3, 2012 5:55:49 PM MST by ElIguana

    “It seems interesting then that an organization that appears quite hopeful to see Barack Obama re-elected in 2012, and is clearly linked to progressive anti-American globalist George Soros is simultaneously calling for Democrats to register as Republicans and support Ron Paul in the Republican primaries.”
    ******************
    ALSO,
    (From the famous Ulsterman Report)

    Ron Paul Endorsed by George Soros “Blue Republican” Organization

    http://theulstermanreport.com/2012/01/03/ron-paul-endorsed-by-progressive-blue-republican-organization/

  35. What About Ron Paul’s Leadership Skills?

    Glenn Beck says,

    “Let’s take him at face value. If you can’t run a newsletter, you shouldn’t be given the keys to the United States of America. I run a network, I run a radio show, run a publishing division, a newsletter. What others? Stage shows, we do all the things. Believe me, if one of those divisions is racist or putting racist things in for a decade, if I don’t catch it – I shouldn’t be allowed to run a shoe store.”

    Also, Glenn’s article says:

    “In the last hour of today’s radio show, Glenn played an audio clip of Ron Paul answering a question from a 9/11 truther.
“Why don’t you come out about the truth about 9/11? “
    Paul responded, “Because I can’t handle the controversy.” After hearing the clip, Pat asked a question every voter on the fence with Ron Paul should ask. “Now, if you don’t believe any of it, if you don’t believe the 9/11 truther stuff, is that how you answer that question: I can’t handle the controversy?”
    “If Ron Paul has been being honest about his opinions with the American people and his supporters, what could really be so controversial about saying “Al-Qaeda did it”? If he is being honest, do we really want a president who won’t stand boldly on an issue as important as the attack that killed over 3,000 innocent Americans on our own soil? ”

    Source:
    http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/01/03/what-do-the-ron-paul-newsletters-say-about-his-leadership-skills/

  36. Citizen WElls, hope you are enjoying the evening as much as I am.
    Santorum

  37. Emails from NAGR on Santorum:
    Instead of coming clean and answering his National Association for Gun Rights Presidential Survey . . .

    . . . Rick Santorum is attacking Ron Paul, who answered his survey 100% in favor of our Second Amendment rights and has a stellar pro-gun record in the House, unlike Mr. Santorum.

    Please call Rick Santorum and let him know that you expect him to apologize for his past votes in support of gun control and promise to never do it again by returning his National Association for Gun Rights Presidential Survey — at once.
    Gingrich is also non responsive to NAGR Survey after repeated attempts to get him to return their survey……

  38. “Sheriff Joe targeted for ouster”
    “Faces ‘resign now’ campaign as Cold Case Posse prepares Obama eligibility report”

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/sheriff-joe-targeted-for-ouster/

  39. It looks like it will be a great night in Iowa.

  40. Newt just gave a fantastic speech.

  41. Bachmann just gave a great speech too.

  42. While I interpret this as very good news in the battle to rid America of a notorious presidential imposter, I find it hard to understand why Citizen Wells apparently endorses a candidate with an anti-constitutional record concerning the Second Amendment (the right to keep and bear arms), to wit: “← Rick Santorum Iowa Caucus, January 3, 2012, Meet the Press interview, Santorum interview impressive, Citizen Wells endorsement”. Please explain why anyone would vehemently oppose an anti-gun fake president while supporting an anti-gun candidate. If the “natural born citizen” clause is to be supported, why is the Second Amendment also not to be supported? Please see http://www.NationalGunRights.org/.

  43. 96% REPORTING

    Rick 29,051
    Mitt 28,938

    113 Difference

  44. No recounts in the caucus system. Still waiting for a truck that is coming to the center for the final count. This is CLOSE.

  45. Perry may withdraw; hard to imagine Bachmann stays in. Gingrich will join the top three. But Paul has much less support in NH and SC and it may soon be a two person race, surprising as it may seem.

  46. Santorum’s speech was the best he ever delivered. It was Reaganesque.

  47. Lots of good comments today, and a bit of enthusiasm from the posters also helps.

    I love good news, especially when it takes into consideration the U.S. Constitution and Presidential eligibility.

    I am waiting for the accusations of racism to begin, following the decision in Georgia. You know that’s all they have left, Obama’s fraud appears to be unraveling. Chris Matthews, and Lawrence O’Donnell are going to go ballistic once this sinks into their treasonous brains.

  48. Santorum gave an amazing speech. I thought Romney gave a great speech too, and was very gracious. This should be an interesting week as we go forward. In all fairness, I thought Perry gave a great speech. I did not see Ron Paul’s speech.

  49. I just heard Ed Rollins on Fox News state that regardless of the final outcome between Santorum and Romney, Santorum is the winner. He came from practical obscurity, worked hard and has gotten to the top.

    CW, I somehow believe that your endorsement of Santorum a few days ago has had a big influence, simply because this blog is visited by so many, including Iowans. Folks have confidence in your opinions. Thank you! This has been a good night.

  50. oldsalt79 | January 3, 2012 at 12:59 pm |

    If he applied for and was granted a name change in Canada based upon the name being vacated, then it is probable that he lied about his existing name and if the court detected this then I seriously doubt that he holds a legally changed name. To prove all of this for sure it would be necessary to find the docket number and take a look at whether the name change petition was acted upon by a VALID Canadian Court,or their equivalent to our Superior Courts. It would seem to me that if a name change was granted via a legal petition it would have become PUBLIC INFORMATION in Canada just as it is in the US. There will also be permanent court records as well.
    *************************************
    OldSalt79, You may know the answer to this.

    If Obama was still technically a British Citizen, could he do his name change in Canada without raising a stink, since Canada is still part of the British empire?

  51. Bob Strauss………………….
    Irregardles he would still have to provide a ceritified BC. Which most of us know he DOESN’T have now, and has NEVER had except for the probability of Kenya. There is NO WAY that he could have filed for a name change in Canada without a BC. Earlier I forwarded some information to you on the blog as to the telephone number of the Office of Vital Statistics, in BC,and the email of that entity. Since a legally granted name change in Canada is treated exactly as it is in the US it would now be PUBLIC INFORMATION, and I would think obtainable for the asking.

  52. Bob Strauss……………..
    Perhaps he used a PHONEY BC there also. In which case the action taken by a court with regard to a hearing, and the subsequent granting of a name change based upon the phoney information would render the name change action legally invalid anyway. I would think that you would be able to obtain any part or all of the petition per se, and it would reflect what name he used and probably everything else as well.

  53. 99% REPORTING

    RICK 29,944
    MITT 29,926

    18 Difference

  54. Bob Strauss………………..
    You need to keep in mind that Canadian law requires a CERTIFIED BC, as part of the name change process. This is irregardless if he is a British subject or not. I personally do not buy any of that tripe. There are far too many LOOSE ends. All of which point to the fact that he cannot post a certified copy of something that he does not have to begin with.

  55. Wow. That was fast. Santorum sent out an email asking for some money.

  56. Bob Strauss……………
    Go to Wikipedia, and type in to your search engine an inquiry ” Legal name change> Canada”.

  57. The Caucas results are just that. It is not an election,and 29,000 people of one state does not necessarily reflect the voter sentiments of the people in 49 other states. Sadly far too many people see it as exactly how an election would turn out if the election was to occur tomorrow. This would mean that the People of Iowa was speaking for the entire US. I don’t know about anyone else, but I personally resent anybody (especially strangers) trying to speak FOR ME, or act in what they perceive as my best interests,particularly when I did NOT at any time ever delegate such authority to anyone in Iowa. The people of Iowa DO NOT speak for me,nor in any way or capacity do they represent me.

  58. citizenwells

    Cabby.
    Thank you.
    This blog is still WE.

  59. citizenwells

    I hear this AM that Romney edged Santorum by 8 votes.

  60. da verg=farleftliberal nutjob

    the word is regardless….there is no such word as irregardless, a lot of people in the midwest and east coast like to use this word, but it doesn’t exist. Regardless works just fine in it’s place.

  61. da verg=farleftliberal nutjob

    I heard ron paul’s speech, it was jibberish as usual and he touted his wife’s cooking book (which was about the only thing that made any sense, not common sense though). He talked about his usual BS. Too bad Iowa allows an almost “open” caucas” allowing people to change their affiliations a few moments ahead of the primary. The only people voting for him were democrats, liberals, those opposing the GOP, and naive students equivalent to the intelligence level of the occuppiers (thugs).
    I know, I was a student once and I voted for Jimmy Carter, how were we fooled back then.

  62. da verg=farleftliberal nutjob

    “he spends too much money” is a relative idea, and very subjective. You can spend money on the right things that government should spend money on, you can spend it when you have the budget to spend it, but you certainly should not spend it when you don’t have the budget. Santorum made wise decisions, he didn’t over spend or over tax the people. Santorum believes in conservative spending priniciples. He believes in a balance budgeted and he believes in cutting taxes. Ron Paul however believes in taking the USA back to the time before TDR was president, put a bag over our heads, ignore the rest of the world, and pray and hope they blow us off the face of the earth. Paul is naive and stupid.

  63. Pingback: Obama ballot challenge cases update, Obama eligibility, Natural Born Citizen Status, Georgia New Hampshire cases, Orly taitz | Citizen WElls

  64. Don’t get me wrong, I’m as OPPOSED to Obama as anyone! But, it seems to me Obama doesn’t have to prove he’s innocent (not guilty). It is the plaintiff that must prove ITS case. Innocence is ASSUMED — it does NOT have to be proven. It is guilt that must be proven. So this whole matter makes no sense, the way it is set up – as far as I can tell (but I’m no lawyer or judge).

  65. citizenwells

    TW-This is not a criminal case yet. A candidate on the ballot has been challenged for eligibility.
    The constitution is clear on eligibility. The burden of proof is on the candidate.

  66. Let’s all stop changing the issue and get back to the fraud obama and his coming demise . There are several states that have petitioned for obama removal from their state’s ballot to run for president . Get ready Patriots it is going to get messy but the US Constitution and the rule of law will be enforced .

  67. There appeared a Snoops confirmation of Obamas BC as real. Now that we know Soros is behind Snoops, it all ties in. Kegan, SCJustice has kicked out most eligibility suits, just plain denied them. Now that she was put on the SC by Obama, it may just be hes trying to stack the deck and will try anything to stay out of Jail.
    I must admit, hes slick as teflon, but in the end, he will be impeached, only this time, not like when Bill Clinton was impeached, he will get a new home, in prison, along with all the others, Nancy, H.Reed, etc, etc.
    Thank God for this Judge.
    Lets all email him to encourage him forward.
    Chuck K

    C

  68. All beware of “presidents” ploy seeking emergency executive authorities ahead of Georgia case and election. Organizing and controlling departments of government. A near lifetime of planning and philosophy in liberal cause does not change overnight. Chameleon tactics and announcement of Tea Party like intentions should be evidence enough after three years of degrading said movement. Seeking to control all branches and override the Georgia case ruling is one intent among many you should consider. Pray this court will seek justice and honor the Constitution and return our country to a Sovereign leader that Loves, Honors, and Respects America and the Constitution. This ruling give all our leaders courage to rebuke the media and seek justice for the people who have been most harmed by this foreign influence over governing our Nation. One nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all. Eugene

  69. Hello,

    As I saw the obama ballot challenge – could youplease tell those involved to

    Amend their complaints to add the real issue which is that Obama does not meet

    The US President qualifications required, which is not just to be a natural born citizen –

    But it is also that he MUST have BOTH parents be US citizens –

    He does not meet this requirement because his father was never a US citizen – only a Kenya citizen –

    However, Obama is a natural born citizen according to US law, so it will get dismissed unless

    You amend the complaint – you must put that he does not meet the US presidential qualifications

    Required to be president of having 2 US citizen parents.

    A person may have 1 parent who is a us citizen and not need to be born in the US & can still be considered

    A natural born citizen – Obama is a US citizen, this is not the issue –

    The issue is that he does not meet the requirements to be president- noone who is a dual citizen

    Can be president, by birth he does not qualify..

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s