Tag Archives: Kerchner v Obama

Kerchner v Obama, Supreme Court fails, Duty as checks and balances, Duty to interpret Constitution, Duty to uphold Constitution, Marbury v Madison

Kerchner v Obama, Supreme Court fails, Duty as checks and balances, Duty to interpret Constitution, Duty to uphold Constitution, Marbury v Madison

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

“It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial
department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to
particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that
rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must
decide on the operation of each.”

“If then the courts are to regard the constitution; and the
constitution is superior to any ordinary act of the legislature;
the constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the
case to which they both apply.”
“The judicial power of the United States is extended to all
cases arising under the constitution. Could it be the intention
of those who gave this power, to say that, in using it, the
constitution should not be looked into? That a case arising
under the constitution should be decided without examining the
instrument under which it arises?  This is too extravagant to
be maintained.”

“Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the
constitution of the United States, if that constitution forms no
rule for his government? if it is closed upon him, and cannot be
inspected by him?”… Marbury versus Madison

The US Supreme Court has denied the petition for writ of certiorari in Kerchner v Obama.

“(ORDER LIST: 562 U.S.)
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 2010
CERTIORARI”
“CERTIORARI DENIED”
“10-446
KERCHNER, CHARLES, ET AL. V. OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF U.S., ET AL.
The motion of Western Center for Journalism for leave to
file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a
writ of certiorari is denied.”

http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/112910zor.pdf

The two main reasons for the existence of the US Supreme Court are as follows:

1. Serve as checks and balances for the other two branches of government . Executive and Legislative.

2. Interpret the US Constitution.

Once again they have failed to do their duty and they should be impeached.

Irrespective of any birth certificate issues surrounding Obama, and those are enough to warrant involvement from the Supreme Court, Obama is clearly not a Natural Born Citizen and the justices know it. They are avoiding the Obama eligibility issues for some reason and should be removed from the court.

For those on the far left, those still in denial, or those incapable of rational thought, the decision to deny the petition is not a ruling on the Kerchner v Obama or any other eligibility case. The justices do not have to give a reason and have not done so. They have simply chosen the coward’s way out. I quoted Marbury v Madison again for a reason.

The swearing in of Obama by Chief Justice Roberts and the difficulty in  stating the oath and the subsequent reswearing in are unprecedented in my lifetime.

The oath: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

CNN has covered the Supreme Court denial.
“The Supreme Court has again cast aside an appeal that raised doubts about President Barack Obama’s U.S. citizenship, a grass-roots legal issue that has gained little legal or political footing, but continues to persist in the courts.

The justices without comment Monday rejected a challenge from Charles Kerchner Jr., a Pennsylvania man who sought a trial in federal court forcing the president to produce documents regarding his birth and citizenship.

Kerchner’s attorney, Mario Apuzzo, had argued in a petition with the Supreme Court that Obama did not fit the definition of a “natural-born citizen” required for the nation’s highest office, as defined by Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution.

That clause states, “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.””

“State birth certificate records show he was born August 4, 1961, in Honolulu, Hawaii. His mother is a native of Kansas; his father was born in Kenya, which at the time was a British colony.”
“Obama and his staff produced copies of his birth certificate when he was running for president in 2008″

Read more:

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/11/29/scotus.birther.appeal/

There is no corroboration of the following:

“State birth certificate records show he was born August 4, 1961, in Honolulu, Hawaii.”

The following is an outright lie and CNN knows it.

“Obama and his staff produced copies of his birth certificate when he was running for president in 2008″

From an honest journalist who once worked at CNN.

US Supreme Court conference, Kerchner v Obama, SCOTUS blog, Supreme Court of the United States blog, Akin Gump

 US Supreme Court conference, Kerchner v Obama, SCOTUS blog, Supreme Court of the United States blog, Akin Gump

As reported here this morning, Kerchner v Obama, filed by attorney Mario Apuzzo,  is to be distributed for Conference by the US Supreme Court Justices, today, November 23, 2010.

From the Supreme Court Docket:

Nov 8 2010 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 23, 2010.

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-446.htm

A historic case, with ramifications that could shake the foundations of this country,  let’s see, why would the SCOTUS blog not be interested?

From the SCOTUS Blog.

“SCOTUSblog is devoted to comprehensively covering the U.S. Supreme Court—without bias and according to the highest journalistic and legal ethical standards.  The blog is provided as a public service and is sponsored by Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP.”

http://www.scotusblog.com/2010/11/tuesday-round-up-49/

Well, you know, sometimes us pesky folks over at Citizen Wells get a little curious. And, well, I just had to know why such an important case such as this wasn’t worth mentioning. So I did a search on Akin Gump Obama contributions and discovered that these folks are real generous with their money. Akin Gump. You know, “Life is like a box of chocolates.”

“OBAMA FOR AMERICA
      PO Box 8102
      Chicago, Illinois   60680

FEC Committee ID #: C00431445
This report contains activity for a Primary Election
Report type: October Quarterly
This Report is an Amendment”

“AKIN GUMP    3,220.00 
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD    4,250.00 
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP    2,000.00 
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER AND FELD    2,300.00 
AKIN GUMP, LLP    75.65 ”

http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q3/C00431445/A_EMPLOYER_C00431445.html

“OBAMA FOR AMERICA
      PO Box 8102
      Chicago, Illinois   60680

FEC Committee ID #: C00431445
This report contains activity for a Primary Election
Report type: July Quarterly
This Report is an Amendment”

“AKIN GUMP    2,350.00 
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD    1,500.00 
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP    7,600.00 
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER AND FELD    2,300.00 
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER FELD    1,000.00 
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAVER & FELD LLP    1,000.00 
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HEW & FIELD    500.00 
AKIN GUMP, ET AL    2,300.00 
AKIN GUMP, LLP    1,775.00 
AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER & FELD, LLP    1,000.00″

From CampaignMoney.com.

“Eliot Cutler Contribution List in 2008
Name & Location Employer/Occupation Dollar
Amount Date Primary/
General Contibuted To”

“Cutler, Eliot
CAPE ELIZABETH, ME
04107 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP/ $500 06/13/2008 P OBAMA FOR AMERICA – Democrat

Cutler, Eliot
CAPE ELIZABETH, ME
04107 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP/ $-500 06/13/2008 P OBAMA FOR AMERICA – Democrat

Cutler, Eliot
CAPE ELIZABETH, ME
04107 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP/ $500 06/13/2008 G OBAMA FOR AMERICA – Democrat

Cutler, Eliot
CAPE ELIZABETH, ME
04107 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP/ $2,000 06/12/2008 P OBAMA FOR AMERICA – Democrat

Cutler, Eliot
CAPE ELIZABETH, ME
04107 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP/ $-1,700 06/12/2008 P OBAMA FOR AMERICA – Democrat

Cutler, Eliot
CAPE ELIZABETH, ME
04107 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP/ $1,700 06/12/2008 G OBAMA FOR AMERICA – Democrat

Cutler, Eliot
CAPE ELIZABETH, ME
04107 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP/ $2,000 03/18/2008 P OBAMA FOR AMERICA – Democrat

Cutler, Eliot
CAPE ELIZABETH, ME
04107 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP/ $2,000 01/31/2008 P OBAMA FOR AMERICA – Democrat”

I did not do an extensive search. This information was obtained quickly. If any of the above is inaccurate, please let me know.

Obama eligibility, Natural born citizen status, Obama birth certificate, Truth emerges, Kerchner v Obama, History being made

Obama eligibility, Natural born citizen status, Obama birth certificate, Truth emerges, Kerchner v Obama, History being made

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

From Citizen Wells yesterday.
“We are poised at historical moments in this country. Tomorrow, November 23, 2010, CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) and his attorney Mario Apuzzo, have a  Petition for Writ of Certiorari scheduled for Conference before the US Supreme Court. In mid December 2010, the court martial of LTC Terry Lakin will begin. LTC Lakin refused to deploy to Afghanistan because he believes that Obama is ineligible to be president and Commander in Chief.”

Today, the US Supreme is scheduled for conference regarding the Kerchner v Obama Petition for Writ of Certiorari. We are watching. With or without the US Supreme Court, the truth about Obama and his eligibility will emerge.

A great American Patriot and at the same time, average American, who has been providing information to me and this blog for over two years, one of the many concerned Americans who put the WE in CitizenWElls, sent me the following report. One person can make a difference.

From NewsFlavor November 22, 2010.

“The Ulsterman Report: Reflections on the White House Insider”

“Finally we have the portrait of a looming scandal Insider has so successfully woven throughout a number of these interviews.  Is this scandal legitimate, or simply a device to send the Obama White House scurrying for cover – some form of political distraction intended to allow Insider and others within the party to ultimately develop a platform in which to launch successful opposition?  “The DOJ, Washington DC, and then back to Chicago.”  According to Insider, there lies the path to this president’s downfall.  President Obama’s murky ties with some of Chicago’s most notorious politicos is known, though Insider might indicate not so nearly known as they should be.  What of Broadway Bank?  Shorebank?  Tony Rezko?  Rod Blagojevich? And so many other names that darken the murky past that is Barack Obama.  The Obama Department of Justice is now facing far more scrutiny than when Insider initially stated that this developing scandal would begin there – with the DOJ.  Is something to be found among the Black Panther voter intimidation case?  Has Attorney General Eric Holder been engaged in a protective cover up of Obama’s complicity in the Rod Blagojevich pay to play scandal?  And what of the “certification file” allegedly mentioned by Nancy Pelosi?  Does such a file actually exist?  Was it Pelosi’s knowledge of the certification process that has allowed her to ultimately remain in power despite overseeing historical losses against Democrats during the midterm elections?  Or does Pelosi have knowledge of something else?   While Insider has repeatedly described any mention of Barack Obama’s eligibility status as “birther” nonsense, they have also initiated that subject themselves on occasion.  Why?  If the issue is so silly, so beyond the realm of possibility, why bring it up at all?  Perhaps as Insider has also hinted at, there does appear to be something there, but that something might prove so debilitating to the nation’s political process that it leaves Insider not wanting to play any part in such a damaging outcome?.  Of this I am certain – Insider knows far more on this subject than they have yet indicated.

As for myself regarding the subject of the “birther” issue, I now openly admit to having “found religion” as it were.  There indeed does appear to be something amiss.  President Obama has spent millionshiding what most would indicate as rather basic information.  Education records.  Writings.  Travel records.  And yes, clear and comprehensive proof of birth and/or citizenship.  Until recently, I was among those who discounted claims of a cover-up surrounding Barack Obama’s birth story as the silly rants of those with far too much time and resulting paranoia on their hands.

No more.

Throughout the Insider interview series, good people have come forward to offer an abundance of information that at the very least, raises the distinct possibility that a determined and ongoing cover up has in fact been underway surrounding this nation’s current president – and any time there is a cover up, there exists the resulting and required question of WHY?  And so I am now left asking that very question, more often, and more loudly.  I hope to be able to ask it of Insider soon.

Insider – please respond.

More work remains undone – far too many questions remain unanswered…

_________

REFERENCES:

The Ulsterman Report: Banking Scandal Lurking for Obama in 2011?

http://newsflavor.com/politics/us-politics/the-ulsterman-report-banking-scandal-lurking-for-obama-in-2011/

White House Insider: Clintons, Scandals, and the Birth Certificate

http://newsflavor.com/politics/world-politics/white-house-insider-clintons-scandals-and-the-birth-certificate/

The Ulsterman Report: Obama White House -vs- Rahm Emanuel

 http://newsflavor.com/politics/us-politics/the-ulsterman-report-obama-white-house-vs-rahm-emanuel/

SUPPORTIVE RESOURCES: 

-The invaluable help and guidance of the Ulsterman Facebook Followers.
-Habledash.com

-Hillbuzz.org
-Anthony G. Martin’s Liberty Sphere Report

-Citizenwells.com

-Godlikeproductions.com

-Freerepublic.com”

Read more:

http://newsflavor.com/politics/us-politics/the-ulsterman-report-reflections-on-the-white-house-insider/#ixzz164HAiVDh

“Never, never, never give up.”…Winston Churchill 

Kerchner v Obama, Charles Kerchner Mario Apuzzo interview, Dr. Kate Revolution Radio Show, Citizen Wells open thread, October 7, 2010

Kerchner v Obama, Charles Kerchner Mario Apuzzo interview, Dr. Kate Revolution Radio Show

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

From Charles Kerchner lead plaintiff in Kerchner v Obama.

“Atty Mario Apuzzo and CDR Kerchner were guests on the Revolution Radio Show hosted by Dr. Kate on Wednesday, 6 Oct 2010, at 9:00 p.m. EST. They discussed the recent filing of a Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court for the Kerchner et al v Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al lawsuit. Direct link to a PODCAST of the show at BlogTalkRadio.com:

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/drkate/2010/10/07/revolution-radio-welcomes-cdr-kerchner-and-attorne


Also stop by and read Dr. Kate’s blog at:
http://drkatesview.wordpress.com/

Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Commander USNR (Retired)
Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner v Obama & Congress
Please if you can, see this site and help the cause:
http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
####”

Kerchner v Obama, Update, September 15, 2010, Charles Kerchner lead plaintiff, Mario Apuzzo attorney

Kerchner v Obama, Update, September 15, 2010, Charles Kerchner lead plaintiff, Mario Apuzzo attorney

Just in from Charles Kerchner, lead plaintiff in Kerchner v Obama.

For Immediate Release – 15 September 2010

Atty Mario Apuzzo & CDR Charles Kerchner will be on the Conservative Monster Radio Show, hosted by Steve Cooper, Blog Talk Radio, Wed 15 Sep 2010 9 PM EST.  They will be discussing the latest status of the Kerchner et al vs Obama & Congress et al lawsuit challenging the constitutional eligibility of Obama to serve as President and Commander in Chief of the military and the election fraud orchestrated by Nancy Pelosi and others in the 2008 presidential election. The case is currently being prepared for filing a Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court.

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/09/atty-mario-apuzzo-cdr-charles-kerchner.html

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Lead Plaintiff
Kerchner et al vs Obama & Congress et al
http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
####

Obama lied ad, Washington Times, September 13, 2010, Obama ineligible, Kerchner v Obama, Mario Apuzzo

Obama lied ad, Washington Times, September 13, 2010, Obama ineligible, Kerchner v Obama, Mario Apuzzo

From Charles Kerchner, lead plaintiff in Kerchner v Obama, September 13, 2010.

“New Ad – Obama Ineligible! I Tried and Lied But It Won’t Go Away! Washington Times National Weekly – 13 Sep 2010 Issue – Pg 15.

Obama: I was born a British Subject – Not a “natural born Citizen” to constitutional standards. I have never conclusively proved I was born in Hawaii. My paternal family in Kenya, Kenyan government officials, and newspapers in Kenya say I was born in Kenya. My maternal grandmother likely falsely and illegally registered me as born in Hawaii to get me, her new foreign-born grandson, U.S. Citizenship.

Link to read and download new ad:
http://www.scribd.com/Ineligible-I-tried-and-lied-but-it-won-t-go-away-Wash-Times-Natl-Wkly-2010-09-13-pg-15/d/37349407

————————————————————————————–

A request from CDR Kerchner:

Also, please cast your votes to Help the Cause to get the word out:
1st: Vote for Mario to be a guest on Judge Andrew Napolitano’s Freedom Watch TV show: Please add your vote here (in addition to making a comment if desired) to get Attorney Mario Apuzzo on the air with the Judge Andrew Napolitano to discuss this issue. Go to this link and click on the VOTE button and cast 3 of your 10 votes for Mario Apuzzo. Don’t just make a comment only. That does not count as a vote. Be sure to VOTE too: http://freedomwatch.uservoice.com/forums/16626-freedom-watch-guest-suggestions/suggestions/268573-mario-apuzzo-esq-

2nd: Vote for the show topic to be “natural born Citizenship”. Please add your vote (in addition to making a comment if desired) for this new TV Show topic suggested by JTX at the Judge Andrew Napolitano “Freedom Watch” TV show suggestion forum. Go to this link and click on the VOTE button and cast 3 of your 10 votes for the show topic to be “natural born Citizenship”. Don’t just make a comment only. That does not count as a vote. Be sure to VOTE too: http://freedomwatch.uservoice.com/forums/16625-freedom-watch-show-ideas/suggestions/969299-natural-born-citizen-meaning-in-natural-law-s?ref=title

Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Commander USNR (Retired)
Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner v Obama & Congress
Please if you can, visit this site and help the cause:
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
####

Posted by cfkerchner at 9:00 AM”

Kerchner v Obama, Update May 24, 2010, Obama 3 enablers, Congress, Courts, Media, Washington Times National Weekly ad

Kerchner v Obama, Update May 24, 2010, Obama 3 enablers

From Charles Kerchner, lead plaintiff in Kerchner v Obama and congress, May 24, 2010.

“New Ad – Obama’s Lack of Eligibility – The Three Enablers of the Cone of Silence in Washington DC – 24 May 2010 issue Washington Times National Weekly – Page 5″

“This “The 3 Enablers of the Cone of Silence in Washington DC” ad shows us who are the three enablers in our American system of government who are permitting Obama’s usurpation of the Office of the Presidency in violation of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution. Obama was born a British Subject under British Nationality Laws since his father was a British Subject in 1961 and was only visiting the USA.

Obama’s father was never a U.S. Citizen, nor even an immigrant to the USA. Just like McCain is a U.S. Citizen because when he was born in Panama his father was a U.S. Citizen, Obama was a British Subject when born since his father was a British Subject.  How can a person who is born a British Subject ever be considered a “natural born Citizen” of the USA?  The answer is simple, he cannot. The founders of our Republic and the framers of our Constitution intended that a “natural born” Citizen is without any doubt a person born in the country to parents who are both Citizens of the country when their child is born. That was also confirmed in a U.S. Supreme Court decision in 1874 named Minor vs Happersett. Most American citizens are natural born Citizens. Obama’s father was never a Citizen of the USA. Thus, Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen” of the USA.

The ancient Asian proverb depicted by the caricatures of the institutions who are enabling Obama in by their See, Hear, and Speak no Evil do nothing mode on the issue is classically known in the USA to depict situations where people are turning a blind eye to the obvious. The ad depicts the situation we are in where the Congress is turning a blind eye and will not “look” at or investigate the merits of the charges. The Courts will not “hear” in a trial the merits of the charges. And the Main Stream Media will not “talk” about the merits of the charges and discuss the Constitutional issues involved with the American people nor will they dig into Obama’s sealed and hidden early life records. Their ignoring the questions and concerns of the People in this matter endangers our liberty by demonstrating that those in power, once in power feel they do not have to obey the Constitution and/or listen to the People.

Charles Kerchner, Commander USNR (Retired)
Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner v Obama & Congress
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
http://www.protectourliberty.org/

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/new-ad-obamas-lack-of-eligibility-three.html